1985-071RESOLUTION NO. 85R-71
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 3448.
WHEREAS, after a request for variance by BEN HATHAWAY
and MARY LOU HATHAWAY, owners, and GREGORY PYROS, agent was
received, a public hearing before the Planning Commission of the
City of Anaheim was held upon due and proper notice, a result of
which Variance No. 3448 was denied covering the following
described property:
THE WEST 190 FEET OF
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST,
DE SANTA ANA, IN THE
RECORDED IN BOOK 51,
IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY; and
THE NORTH 210 FEET OF THE
THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SECTION 27, IN TOWNSHIP 4
IN THE RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJON
CITY OF ANAHEIM AS PER MAP
PAGE 10, MISCELLANEOUS MAPS,
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
WHEREAS, the City Council does further find, after
careful consideration of the action of the Planning Commission and
all evidence and reports offered at said public hearing before the
City Council regarding said requested waiver(s), that all of the
conditions set forth in Section 18.06.080 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code are not present, and that said waiver(s) of off-street parking
requirements should be denied, for the following reasons:
1. That the variance(s) will cause an increase in traffic
congestion in the immediate vicinity and adversely affect adjoining
land uses due to the lack of sufficient off-street parking
facilities to accommodate the proposed restaurant expansion; and
2. That the granting of the variance(s) will be detrimental
to the peace, health, safety or general welfare of the citizens of
the City of Anaheim because only 35 off-street parking spaces are
available on the premises and the restaurant (together with the
proposed expansion) would require a minimum of 143 off-street
parking spaces to comply with minimum Anaheim Municipal Code
requirements.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Anaheim that said Variance be, and the same is hereby,
denied.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the time within which a
rehearing must be sought is governed by the provisions of Section
1.12.100 of the Anaheim Municipal Code and, the time within which
judicial review of a final decision must be sought is governed by
Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Anaheim this 5th day of February, 1985.
I~~
MA R OF THE CITY O ANAH IM
ATTEST:
R ~.J~-~
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHE
JLW:pm
2496U
-2-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 85R-71 was introduced and adopted at a regular .'"*+~.
meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on
the 5th day of February, 1985, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Pickier and Roth
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AND I FURTHER certify that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said
Resolution No. 85R-71 on the 5th day of February, 1985.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed tYie seal of the
City of Anaheim this 5th day of February, 1985.
Q ~~~
CITY CLERK OF T E CITX OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 85R-71 duly passed and adopted
by the Anaheim City Council on February 5, 1985.
~~
Q
CITY CLERK