92-075 RESOLUTION NO. 92R-75
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR A
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FOR FISCAL
~EAR 1992-1993 PURSUANT TO THE HOUSING AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1980, AS
AMENDED, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE AND FILE THE APPLICATION THEREFOR
WHEREAS, Activities and Programs under Title I of the
Housing and Community Development.Act of 1980, as amended (the
"Housing and Community Development Act"), have been duly
considered and appropriate public hearings have been conducted;
and
WHEREAS, such solicitation of public opinion has resulted in
a "Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and
Projected Use of Funds"~ and
WHEREAS, the city Council hereby gives assurance that the
City of Anaheim will comply with all laws, regulations, and
executive orders as more particularly set forth in that certain
Department of Housing and Urban Development document entitled
"Certifications," a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit
"A" and made a"part hereof as though fully set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City Anaheim as follows:
1. The City Council of the City of Anaheim hereby approves
the "Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and
Projected Use of Funds" as the application for a Community
Development Block Grant for fiscal year 1992-1993 (the
"Application") for the Eighteenth Year funding under Title I of
the Housing and Community Development Act.
2. The City Manager of the City of Anaheim be, and hereby
is, authorized to execute and file the Application pursuant to
the Housing and Community Development Act.
CDBGRES92 3503-10618
02/24/92:4:331eg:bem -- 1 --
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the City
Council of the City of Anaheim this 21st day of
April , 1992.
- ~v~YOK R~F THE C~~IT _OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
CDBGRES92 3503-10618
02/24/92:4:33leg:hem --2--
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, LEONORA N. SOML, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. 92R-75 was introduced and adopted at a regular
meeting provided by law, of the Anaheim City Council held on the 21st day of
April, 1992, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Simpson, Ehrle, Pickler and Daly
NOES; COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Hunter
AND I FURTHER certify that the Mayor Pro Tem of 'the City of Anaheim signed said
Resolution No. 92R-75 on the 22nd day of April, 1992.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the
City of Anaheim this 22nd day of April, 1992.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that
the foregoing is the original of Besolution No. 92R-75 duly passed and adopted
by the City Council of the City of Anaheim on April 21, 1992.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHE~-
Attachment II
PROPOSED STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND
PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS
OVERALL GOALS
The proposed 1992-1993 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for
the City of Anaheim will undertake activities from the perspective of meeting the
primary objective of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1980,
as amended, which is the development of viable urban communities by providing
decent housing, a suitable environment and expanding economic opportunities
principally for persons of low and moderate income. Community Development Block
Grant funded activities will meet the standard of one of three national objectives.
These objectives are that the activities (1) benefit low and moderate income persons,
(2) aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight and (3) are designed to
meet the community development needs having a particular urgency which pose a
serious immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community.
The major need in the revitalization of neighborhoods in Anaheim is to improve the
housing stock and upgrade the other physical conditions. The housing and
neighborhood improvements which will be funded through the 1992-1993 CDBG
entitlement grant will be concentrated in the CDBG Target Areas.
OBJECTIVES
1. Housing and Neighborhood Improvements in Target Areas
The centermost part of Anaheim has been designated as the location of the
four CDBG Target Areas which are: Central City, Citron, South Anaheim,
Patrick Henry. The long term objective for the four areas is to preserve
neighborhoods, rehabilitate housing, remove substandard housing, preserve
historic housing structures, remove physical barriers to the handicapped in
housing units, provide for public improvements, park developments,
neighborhood facilities and related public service programs necessary to
stabilize or revitalize neighborhoods. The short term objectives and goals are
to concentrate on rehabilitation of existing housing, complete or initiate needed
park improvements, recreational and neighborhood facilities and public
works(ie. construction of storm drains, street reconstruction, etc.) market
rehabilitation loans for rental units tied to Section 8 (Housing Assistance
Program) participation, and to continue Code Enforcement activities in the
CDBG Target Areas. The City of Anaheim 1992-1993 CDBG Program will
reflect a continued concentrated effort of manpower and resources to meet the
needs of persons residing in these areas to renovate deteriorating
neighborhoods.
Multi-family housing rehabilitation will be carried out with a "targeted" approach.
Resources will be focused in such a manner as to revitalize the targeted area with
improvements to streets, street lighting, providing for open green spaces where
1
possible, and including the development of a collective property management
program, Currently there are two areas identified for purposes of this focused
revitalization: (1) the South of Romneya Apartment Area located in the Patrick Henry
Neighborhood Target Area; and (2) the Jeffrey-Lynne Apartment Area located in the
South Anaheim Neighborhood Target Area.
The following housing improvement programs will be continued in the four Target
Areas:
® CDBG funded rehabilitation loans for eligible owner-occupant households in the
target areas (#1 Hsg. Rehab, page 5).
· Owner investor rehabilitation loans to benefit low and moderate income renters
(#1 Hsg. Rehab, page 5).
· Deferred loans (#1 Hsg. rehab, page 5).
· Housing improvement incentives which include rebates and tool rental
assistance.
The following activities will be implemented or continued in each respective Target
Area for neighborhood enhancement:
Central City Neighborhood Target Area
· Beautification Project: Treatment to parkways (planting trees, ground cover,
etc.), improvements to curbs, sidewalks, underground utilities in area bordered
by Lincoln Avenue to the south, Claudina Street to the west, Adele Street to
the north and Philadelphia Street to the east (#1 Neigh/Pub Fac. page 5).
· Street light installation (#2 Neigh/Pub Fac. page 5). Residents have requested
that "old style" standards be installed that will harmonize with character of
neighborhood housing. Area where lights will be installed is bordered by La
Palma on the north, Harbor Blvd. on the west, Lemon Street on the east, and
North Street on the south.
Citron Neighborhood Target Area
® Street light installation: Residents have requested continuance of installation
of "old style" street lights for enhancement and increased neighborhood
security (#3 Neigh/Pub. Fac., page 5).
· Ben Franklin School Improvements: Residents have expressed need for a
covered sheltered area at the school for outdoor lunching. (#8 Neigh/Pub. Fac.,
pg. 5).
2
Patrick Henry Neighborhood Target Area
· Manzanita Park Sound Wall Construction: Funds have been set aside to begin
to design the sound wall which will reduce noise generated by the 91 Freeway
which abuts the park to the north and will enhance security (#7 Neigh/Pub.
Fac., page 5).
South Anaheim Neighborhood Target Area
· Funds have been allocated for the costs of operating a community center in the
Jeffrey-Lynne apartment neighborhood (#7 Pub. Svc, page 5).
· Funds set aside to upgrade existing street lights on Leatrice Lane, Wakefield
Street, between Haster Street and Mountainview (//5 Neigh/Pub. Fac., page 5).
2. Citywide Activities
Although the majority of substandard housing is located in the four CDBG
Target Areas, substandard housing does exist in neighborhoods throughout the
City on a spot basis. Low interest rehabilitation loans will be made available to
low and moderate income persons on a citywide basis. First priority in
processing loan applications will be given to those persons residing in the
Target Areas.
3. Public Service, Interim, and Special Activities
Clean-up campaigns will continue to be carried out as an interim activity in the
four CDBG Target Areas. This activity consists of placing large trash bins
strategically to encourage general clean-up and beautification efforts by
Anaheim residents. A small allocation of $10,000 is earmarked for the Orange
County Council on Aging to provide federally mandated ombudsman services
to elderly residents of long-term residential care facilities.
· Feedback Foundation, Inc. received an allocation of $10,410 to feed
elderly "shut-ins" in Anaheim.
· The Boys & Girls Club of Anaheim is performing a role in the Save-A-
Youth effort and has been allocated 925,000. The Boys & Girls Club
of Anaheim focuses its efforts on the elementary school age youth,
providing recreational and educational opportunities to younger high-risk
youth of Anaheim.
The Orange County Center for Health was allocated 930,428 for development of
design plans for a new facility in Anaheim.
3
The Library Bookmobile has been earmarked to receive $25,000 to continue outreach
library services to low and moderate income neighborhoods.
Graffiti Removal Services will continue to provide its service in the CDBG Target
Areas, as will Code Enforcement inspections.
Activities to affirmatively further fair housing will continue to be provided by the
Orange County Fair Housing Council. An allocation of $55,000 is earmarked for this
purpose.
A police department program called Gang Enforcement that enhances enforcement
diversion, and prevention of gang involvement will be continued in the Target Areas
with a grant of $206,476. Also, a city-run program to assist seniors find and match
up with compatible roommates called Shared Housing received a $16,000 grant to
help defray staff costs.
1992-1993 FUNDING ALLOCATION:
The CDBG entitlement grant for the program year beginning July 1, 1992 that the City
of Anaheim will receive is $2,629,000. Each year approximately $200,000 is
generated in program income. These are funds that result from rehabilitation loan
paybacks. All such funds are made available to eligible residents as rehabilitation
loans. This practice will continue per City Council approval. Proposed activities were
recommended during public hearings and meetings held by the Communitywide CDBG
Citizen Participation Committee. Funding commitments were made by the Anaheim
City Council at a public hearing held on March 17, 1992.
ASSESSMENT OF RELATIONSHIP
Attached is an assessment of the relationship of the use of funds to the community
development objectives identified in the Final Statement for 1991-1992 as well as to
the broad national objectives. Activities proposed for funding from the 1992-1993
grant are described in the following section.
Prstmt92.ap
4
PROPOSED PROGRAM ACTIVITY:
Below is a summary of the housing and neighborhood improvement and public service activities which
will be funded by the 1992-1993 Community Development Block Grant Entitlement:
HOUSING, REHABILITATION & PRESERVATION ACTIVITIES: $1,170,363
1. Loan subsidies, deferred loans, housing incentives including
rehabilitation ................................ 540,000
2. Code Enforcement including attorney costs ........... 630,363
PUBLIC SERVICE ACTIVITIES & SUB RECIPIENT GRANTS: 393,314
1. Library Bookmobile ........................... 25,000
? O.C. Council on Aging ......................... 10,000
~,,,-- Boys & Girls Club ............................ 25,000
4. Feedback Foundation .......................... 10,410
5. Shared Housing .............................. 16,000
6. Gang Enforcement Project ...................... 206,476
7. Jeffrey-Lynne Comm. Ctr. Operating Costs ........... 70,000
8. Orange County Center for Health - Design Costs ....... 30,428
NEIGHBORHOOD/PARKS/PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPROV.: ...... 750,250
1. Neighborhood Beautification Project - 3(CCNC) ........ 150,000
2. Street Light Installation (CCNC) ................... 80,000
3. Street light Installation - 2 (CNC) .................. 175,000
4. Street Light Upgrades - 2 (SANC) ................. 40,000
5. Clean-up Campaigns (4TA) ...................... 60,500
Graffiti Removal (4TA) ......................... 50,000
7. Manzanita Park Sound Wall Const (PHNC) ............ 166,250
8. Ben Franklin School Project (CNC) ................. 28,500
ADMINISTRATION: ................................ 215,000
1. General Management & Overhead ................. 160,000
2. Fair Housing Activities ......................... 55,000
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: ........................... 100,000
CONTINGENCY: .................................. 73
TOTAL ALLOCATIONS: ............................. $2,629,000
PRSTMT92.AP
5
ASSESSMENT: RELATIONSHIP OF USE OF FUNDS TO COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES IN THE FINAL STATEMENT
The City of Anaheim's Community Development Block Grant Program for 1990-1991
and 1991-1992 were undertaken with the intent of meeting the following national
objectives: prevention or elimination of slums and blight; and principally benefiting low
and moderate income households through the activities undertaken. The target areas,
as described in the Final Statement of 1992-1993, are retained in an effort to
concentrate manpower and resources to revitalize deteriorating neighborhoods and to
meet the needs of residents in those target areas.
PROJECT STATUS AND OBJECTIVES
The following housing improvement programs were implemented or continued in the
four CDBG Target Areas:
CDBG funded rehabilitation loans for eligible households in the target areas (also
Citywide on a spot basis)
Owner-investor rehabilitation loans to benefit low and moderate income renters
(also Citywide)
Deferred loans (also Citywide)
Rebates for housing improvements (Target areas only)
The housing improvements programs are intended to conserve the housing stock and
meet the objective principally benefiting low and moderate income residents in the
Target Areas and Citywide through spot rehabilitation of housing. The City of
Anaheim recognizes that although the majority of substandard housing is located in
the Target Areas, substandard housing units are found throughout the City on a spot
basis.
These projects listed below met two objectives: benefit to areas in which the majority
of households were of low or moderate income, and contributed to the prevention or
elimination of blight. Neighborhood improvement activities were as follows:
CENTRAL CITY NEIGHBORHOOD TARGET AREA
Intend to Accomplish in 1991-1992:
eExpansion of Little Peoples Park
elnstallation of security lights at Julianna Park
eDevelopment of a community garden at Washington Community Center
eReconstruction of restrooms on west end of Pearson Park
®Senior Citizen Center - Westside - Feasibility Study
· Neighborhood Beautification Project to instal. I "old style" light standards, treatment
to sidewalks, parkway improvement, on Philadelphia Street, Adele Street, Cypress
Street, Emily Street.
®Alley revitalization to eliminate debris, large items, graffiti, inoperative vehicles in
alleyways.
CITRON NEIGHBORHOOD TARGET AREA
Accomplished in 1990-1991:
eRevitalization of 10 miles of alleys in Citron Area
Intend to accomplish in 1991-1992:
elnstallation of "old style" street lights on Citron, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois St., West
Street, from Lincoln Avenue to Santa Ana Streets.
eDevelopment of child-care/recreational center at Ben Franklin school
SOUTH ANAHEIM NEIGHBORHOOD TARGET AREA'
Accomplished in 1990-1991:
eAcquisition of apartment building for use as a community center in the Jeffrey-Lynne
neighborhood.
eDevelopment of Audre Park in the Jeffrye-Lynne area
eConstructon of storm drain on Ninth/Audre
Intend to accomplish in 1991-1992:
®Upgrade of street lights on Leatrice, Wakefield, Mountainview
PATRICK HENRY NEIGHBORHOOD TARGET AREA
Intend to Accomplish 1991-1992:
®Upgrade Street lights throughout Patrick Henry Area
Code Enforcement activities and graffiti removal services continued in 1991-1992.
Other services funded in 1991-1992 and targeted to benefit low and moderate income
persons included: the Library Bookmobile provides outreach library services to
residents in low and moderate income neighborhoods. Clean-up campaigns and Bulky-
Item-Pick-up programs continued as interim activities in the four Target Areas.
The O. Co Council on Aging provides ombudsman services to elderly in long-term care
facilities. The Anaheim Interfaith Shelter received a grant of $20,000 to help defray
operational costs. Hope House, a drug and alcohol residential rehabilitation facility for
low income young adults received $ 8,125 to cover operational costs. The Boys &
Girls Club received $25,000 to continue their anti-gang efforts with youth of
low/moderate income neighborhoods through Project Save-A-Youth. A set-aside of
7
$60,000 is earmarked to cover the costs of operating a social service/recreational
center in the Jeffrey-Lynne apartment area.
The Fair Housing Council of Orange County was allocated $57,576 for 1991-1992
to provide services which affirmatively further fair housing for Anaheim residents.
No new objectives were developed during the program year. Once all projects and
activities are completed, the objectives for 1990-1991 and 1991-1992 program years
will have been met.
a~efnlst92,93.ep
"EXHIBIT A"
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
GRANTEE CERTIFICATIONS
The Grantee certifies that:
(a) It possesses legal authority to make a grant submission and to execute a
community development and housing program;
(b) Its governing body has duly adopted or passed as an official act a resolution,
motion or similar action authorizing the person identified as the official
representative of the grantee to submit the final statement and amendments
thereto and all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing
and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the grantee
to act in connection with the submission of the final statement and to provide such
additional information as may be required;
(c)Prior to submission of its final statement to HUD, the grantee has:
1. Met the citizen participation requirements of 570.301 (b);
2. Prepared its final statement of community development objectives and
projected use of funds in accordance with 570.301 (c) and made the final
statement available to the public;
(d) It is following a detailed citizen participation plan which:
1. Provides for and encourages citizen participation, with particular emphasis
on participation by persons of low and moderate income who are residents
of slum and blighted areas and of areas in which funds are proposed to be
used, and provides for participation of residents in low and moderate
income neighborhoods as defined by the local jurisdiction;
2. Provides citizens with reasonable and timely access to local meetings,
information, and records relating to the grantee's proposed use of funds,
as required by the regulations of the Secretary, and relating to 'the actual
use of funds under the Act;
3. Provides for technical assistance to groups representatives of persons of
low and moderate income that request such assistance in developing
proposals with the level and type of assistance to be determined by the
grantee;
4. Provide~ for public hearings to obtain citizen views and to respond to
proposals and questions at all stages of the community development
IA
program, including at least the development of needs, the review of
proposed activities, and review of program performance, which hearings
shall be held after adequate notice, at times and locations convenient to
potential or actual beneficiaries, and with accommodation for the
handicapped;
5. Provides for a timely written answer to written complaints and grievances,
within 15 working days where practicable; and
6. Identifies how the needs of non-English speaking residents will be met in
the case of public hearings where a significant number of non-English
speaking residents can be reasonably expected to participate;
(e) The grant will be conducted and administered in compliance with:
1. Title Vl of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88.352; 42 U.S.C. 2000d
~ et sea.): and
2. The Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.(:;. 3601.20)
It will affirmatively further fair housing;
(g) It has developed its final statement of projected use of funds so as to give
maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low and moderate income
families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; (the final
statement of projected use of funds may also include activities which the grantee
certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having a
particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate
threat to the health or welfare of the community, and other financial resources are
not available); except that the aggregate use of CDBG funds received under
~,. section 106 of the ACt, and if applicable, under section 108 of the ACt, during the
1992-1993 program year(s) (a period specified by the grantee consisting of one,
two or three consecutive years), shall principally benefit persons of low and
moderate income in a manner that ensures that not less than 70 percent of such
funds are used for activities that benefit such persons during such period;
(h) It has developed a community development plan, for the period specified in
paragraph (g) above, that identifies community development and housing needs
and specifies community development and housing needs and specifies both short
and long-term community development objectives that have been developed in
accordance with the primary objective and requirements of the Act;
(i) It is following:
1. A current housing affordability strategy which has been approved by HUD
in accordance with section 105 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National
Affordable Housing Act; or
.?,A
2. A housing assistance plan which has been approved by HUD during the
180 day period beginning November 28, 1990, or during such longer period
as may be prescribed by the Secretary in any case for good cause.
It will not attempt to recover any capital costs of public improvements assisted in
whole or part with funds provided under section 106 of the Act or with amounts
resulting from a guarantee under section 108 of the Act by assessing any amount
against properties owned and occupied by persons of low and moderate income,
including any fee charged or assessment made as a condition of obtaining access
to such public improvements, unless;
1. Funds received under section 106 of the Act are used to pay the proportion
of such fee or assessment that relates to the capital costs of such public
improvements that are financed from revenue sources other than under Title
I of the Act; or
2. For purposes of assessing any amount against properties owned and
occupied by persons of moderate income, the grantee certifies to the
Secretary that it lacks sufficient funds received under section 106 of the Act
to comply with the requirements of subparagraph (1) above;
(k) Its notification, inspection, testing and abatement procedures concerning lead-
based paint will comply with 570.$08;
(I) It will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as
required under 570.606(a) and Federal implementing regulations; the requirements
in 570.606(b) governing and the residential anti-displacement and relocation
assistance plan under section 104(d) of the Act (including a certification that the
~' grantee is following such a plan); the relocation requirements of 570.606(c)
governing displacement subject to section 104(k) of the Act; and the relocation
requirements of 570.606(c) governing optional relocation assistance under section
105(a) (11)of the Act; and
(m) It has adopted and is enforcing:
1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies
within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil
rights demonstrations; and
2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically
barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of
such non-violent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction;
(n) To the best of its knowledge and belief:
1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on
behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an
officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or
employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in
connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any
Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any
cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal,
amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or
cooperative agreement;
2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will
be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer
or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee
of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with
~ this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, it will complete
and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in
accordance with its instructions; and
3. It will require that the language of paragraph (n) of this certification be
included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including
subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and
cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose
accordingly;
(o) It will continue to provide a drug-free workplace by:
1. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture,
distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is
~, prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be
taken against employees for violation of such prohibition;
2. Establishing an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform its
employees about:
(a) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
(b) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
(c) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee
assistance programs; and
(d) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse
violations occurring in the workplace;
4 A
3. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the
performance of the grant to be given a copy of the statement required by
paragraph 1;
4. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (1) that, as
a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will:
(a) Abide by the terms of the statement; and
(b) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation
of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than
five calendar days after such conviction;
5. Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving
notice under subparagraph 4(b) from an employee or otherwise receiving
actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must
provide notice, including position title, to every grant officer or other
designee on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working,
unless the Federal agency has designated a central point for the receipt of
such notices. Notice shall include the identification number (s) of each
affected grant;
6. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving
notice under subparagraph 4(b), with respect to any employee who is so
convicted -
(a) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up
to and including termination; or consistent with the requirements of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or
,~v (b) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse
assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by
a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other
appropriate agency;
7. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace
through implementation of paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6).
8. The grantee shall insert in the space provided on the attached "Place of
Performance" form the site(s) for the performance of work to be carried out
with the grant funds (including street address, city, county, state, and zip
code). The grantee further certifies that, if it is subsequently determined
that additional sites will be used for the performance of work under the
grant, it shall notify the U. S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
immediately upon the decision to use such additional sites by submitting a
revised "Place of Performance" form.
5A
PLACE OF PERFORMANCE
FOR CERTIFICATION REGARDING DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS
Name of Grantee: City of Anaheim
Grant Program Name: Community Development Block Grant
Grant Number: B-92-MC-06-0501
Date: 3-26-92
The grantee shall insert in the space provided below the site(s) expected to be used for
the performance of work under the grant covered by the certification:
Place of Performance (include street address, city, county, state, zip code for each site):
Address: 300 S. Harbor Blvd.. Suite 600. Anaheim
Orange County. California 92805
GRANTCERT.4.92