92-166 RESOLUTION NO. 92R-166
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA~ SETTING
PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS
REGARDING CITY MEASURES AND DIRECTING
THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE IMPARTIAL
ANALYSES.
WHEREAS, a General Municipal Election is to be held in the City of
Anaheim, California, on November 3, 1992, at which there will be submitted to
the voters the following measures:
MEASURE NO. 1
CITY COUNCIL TERM LIMITS. Shall Section 503.5 be added
to the City Charter generally limiting consecutive years
of service by members of the City Council, including the
Mayor, to a combined total of two four-year terms?
MEASURE NO. 2
UTILITY REVENUE TRANSFER LIMITS. Shall Section 1221 of
the city Charter which provides restrictions upon the
City Council in establishing water and electric utility
rates be amended to provide that not more than 8 percent
of the gross revenues earned by each utility during the
preceding fiscal year may be paid into the general fund
of the city during any fiscal year?
MEASURE NO. 3
CLOSED SESSION MEETINGS. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT. Shall
Sections 510 and 904 of the City Charter be amended
to conform to the requirements of state law
concerning the permissible grounds for holding closed
session meetings by the City council and its boards
and commissions?
MEASURE NO. 4
MAXIMUM FINES. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT. Shall Sections
515 and 1501 of the City Charter be amended to
increase the maximum fine for Charter or ordinance
violations from $500 to $1000 to conform to state
law and to allow future fine increases in conformance
with state law change?
MEASURE NO. 5
PUBLIC CONTRACT BIDDING. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT. Shall
Section 1211 of the City Charter be amended to conform
certain language £n said section to the provisions of
state law relating to the requirement to award certain
public works contracts to the lowest responsible bidder?
MEASURE NO. 6
CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT. Shall
Section 1217 of the City Charter be amended to conform
the time limits within which the City is required to
act on claims against the City to the provisions of
state law?
MEASURE NO. 7
READING OF ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.
Shall Section 511 of the City Charter be amended to authorize
the City Council to adopt a single motion at any City Council
meeting waiving the oral reading of the complete text of all
ordinances and resolutions adopted at such meeting in lieu of
the current procedure which requires a separate waiver for
each ordinance or resolution?
MEASURE NO. 8
ADVISORY VOTE ONLY
CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION LIMITS.
Should the City Council adopt an ordinance limiting the amount
of campaign contributions a city candidate may receive from
any single source to $1,000 per election?
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA,
DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the City Council authorizes
MEASURE 1 Favor: Hunter/Daly/Ehrle A§ainst: Pickler
MEASURE 2
MEASURE 3 None
MEASURE 4 None
MEASURE 5 None
MEASURE 6
MEASURE 7 None
MEASURE 8 Favor: Hunter/Daly/Ehrle A~ainst: Pickler
-2-
members of that body, to file written argument(s) regarding the City measures
as specified above in accordance with Article 4, Chapter 3, Division 5 of the
Elections Code of the State of California and to change the argument until and
including the date fixed by the City Clerk after which no arguments for or
against the City measure may be submitted to the city Clerk.
SECTION 2. That the City Council directs the City Clerk to transmit a
copy of the measure to the City Attorney, unless the organization or salaries
of the office of the City Attorney are affected. The City Attorney shall
prepare impartial analyses of the measures showing the effect of the measures
on the existing law and the operation of the measure. If the measure affects
the organization or salaries of the office of the City Attorney, the City
Clerk shall prepare the impartial analysis. The impartial analysis shall be
filed by the date set by the City Clerk for the filing of primary arguments.
SECTION 3. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and
adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original
resolutions.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED ON JULY 28, 1992.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK OF T~{E C~-TY OF ANAHEIM
(Seal)
-3-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 92R-166
was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the Anaheim City Council held on the 28th
day of July, 1992, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Simpson, Ehrle, Plclder, Daly and Hunter
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said Resolution No. 92R-166 on the 29th
day of July, 1992.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this 29th
day of July, 1992. '
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, LEONORA N, SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Is the original of
Resolution No. 92R-166 duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim on July 28, 1992.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM