Loading...
1981-563RESOLUTION NO. 81R -563 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2268 WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive an application for a conditional use permit from ARMAND A. STEPHANIAN, et al., owners, and DANIEL J. BARRETT, agent, to permit an automobile impound yard on certain real prop- erty situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, legally described as: PARCEL 1: That portion of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 18 Township 4 South, Range 10 West, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in book 51 page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps in the office of the County Recorder of said County, de- scribed as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of said Section 18 North 88° 57' 34" East 511.00 feet from the Northwest corner of said Section; thence South 0 13' 10" East 190.00 feet parallel with the West line of said Section; thence North 88° 57' 34" East 142.80 feet parallel with said North line to the East line of the West 20 acres of the North half_ of the Northwest quarter of Section 18, thence North 190.00 feet along said East line of said North line; thence South 88 57' 34" West 142.72 feet to the point of beginning. EXCEPT the north 66.00 feet thereof. PARCEL 2: The North 5 acres of the West 20 acres of the North half of the Northwest quarter of Section 18, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in book 51, page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. EXCEPT the North 190.00 feet thereof. ALSO EXCEPT the West 418.97 feet thereof; and ATTY -58 (Page 1 of 2 Pages) WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission dicl hold a public hearing upon said application at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim, notices of which public hearing were duly given as re- quired by law and the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18.03 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and WIIEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investi- gation and studies made by itself and in its behalf and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, did adopt its Resolution No. PC81 -211 dpny;., Conditional Use Permit No. 2268 and WHEREAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law, an interested party or the City Council, on its own motion, caused the review of said Planning Commission action at a duly noticed public hearing; and WHEREAS, at the time and place fixed for said public hearing, the City Council did hold and conduct such public hearing and did give all persons interested therein an opportunity to be heard and did receive evidence and reports, and did consider the same; and WHEREAS, the City Council does find, after careful con- sideration of the action of the Planning Commission and all evidence and testimony received at said public hearing before the City Council, that all of the conditions and criteria set forth in Section 18.03.030.030 of the Anaheim Municipal Code are not present for the following reasons: 1. That the proposed use will adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; and 2. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is not adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare; and 3. That the granting of the conditional use permit would be detrimental to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning Commission denying Conditional Use Permit No. 2268 be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, and that the request of ARMAND A. STEPHANIAN, owner and DANIEL J. BARRETT, agent, to permit an automobile impound yard on the hereinabove described property be, and the same is hereby, denied BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that notice is hereby given to the applicant that the time within which judicial review of the afore- said decision must be sought is governed by the provisions of Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim this 8th day of December, 1981. ATTEST: CITY LERK OF TH CI OF ANAHEIM JLW:fm MA y OF THE C OF ANAH IM (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM I, LINDA D. ROBERTS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 81R -563 was introduced and adopted, at a regular meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on the 8th day of December, 1981, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said Resolution No. 81R -563 on the 8th day of December, 1981. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 8th day of December, 1981. eC% CITY CLE OF THE TY OF ANAHEIM I, LINDA D. ROBERTS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 81R -563 duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City Council on December 8, 1981.