Loading...
91-119 RESOLUTION NO. 91R-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO CERTAIN AGREEMENTS FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY WHEN THE AMOUNTS DO NOT EXCEED $25,000.00. WHEREAS, Section 518 of the Charter of the city of Anaheim provides that, by ordinance or resolution, the city Council may authorize the City Manager to bind the city, with or without a written contract, for the acquisition of equipment, materials, supplies, labor, services or other items included within the budget approved by the City Council, and may impose a monetary limit upon such authority; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Charter Section 518, the city Council desires to grant authority to the City Manager to enter into agreements so long as the amount of each contract does not exceed $25,000.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city Council of the City of Anaheim that it does hereby authorize the City Manager to bind the City for the acquisition of equipment, materials, supplies, labor, services or other items included within the budget approved by the City Council, provided said agreements do not exceed the sum of $25,000.00 each. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the authority granted herein shall not apply to Public Works agreements entered into pursuant to City of Anaheim Charter Section 1211. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Resolution No. 85R-42 be, and it is hereby, rescinded. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the City Council of the city of Anaheim this 23rd day of April, 1991. ATTEST: ~ CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM LAM/~: dw ORDRES/R32 CMAUTH. 116 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 91R-119 was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the Anaheim City Council held on the 23rd day of April, 1991, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Simpson, Daly, Pickler, Ehrle and Hunter NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None AND I FURTHER certify that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said Resolution No. 91R-119 on the 24th day of April, 1991. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 24th day of April, 1991. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (SEAL) I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 91R-119, duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim on April 23, 1991. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CITY OF ANAHEIM - CALIFORNIA COUNCIL POLICY Subject: Policy Effective Number Date Page SELECTION OF PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANTS 401 8-28-79 1 of 3 It is the policy of the city Council that the following procedures shall be used in the selection of technical consulting services. This policy shall include, but not be limited to, services in the following fields: (Legal services are not included.) Engineering (civil, mechanical, electrical, structural, traffic, etc.) Architecture Landscape Architecture city and Regional Planning Economic Analysis Property Appraisals Financial Services Data Processing Services Purpose of Policy Technical consultant services are of a professional nature, and due to the ethical codes of the professions involved as well as the nature of the services to be provided, do not readily fall within the competitive bidding process. Technical consultants should be individually selected for a specific project or problem with the objective of selecting the most qualified consultant at a fair and reasonable cost. Selection Procedures A. Major Projects - Anticipated fee of over $25,000 1. Affected department(s) shall prepare a Request For Proposals (RFP) and invite a minimum of five (5) qualified firms to submit proposals. 2. When five (5) potential firms are unavailable, or if it is in the best interest of the City to limit the number of firms solicited, the basis for such action should be included in the report to the City Council. Revised: 4-23-91 CITY OF ANAHEIM - CALIFORNIA COUNCIL POLICY Subject: Policy Effective Number Date Page SELECTION OF PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANTS 401 8-28-79 2 of 3 3. A Review Board, selected by the appropriate department head and composed of appropriate staff representatives and/or qualified outside representatives, will review the proposals received and select the most qualified firms for interviews. The Review Board shall rank the consultants based upon the following criteria: a. Ability of the consultants to perform the specific tasks outlined in the RFP. b. Qualifications of the specific individuals who will work on the project. c. Amount and quality of time key personnel will be involved in their respective portions of the project. d. Reasonableness of the fee requested to do the work. e. Demonstrated record of success by the consultant on work previously performed for the City, and for other municipalities or ~ enterprises. f. The specific method and techniques to be employed by the consultant on the project or problem. 4. The Review Board's recommended selection will be forwarded to the City Manager. If the fee does not exceed $25,000, the City Manager may execute the agreement. If the fee exceeds $25,000, the recommended selection will be placed on the Council agenda. The recommendation should include the fees quoted by each consultant and a summary of the basis used to select the recommended consultant. Revised: 4-23-91 CITY OF ANAHEIM - CALIFORNIA COUNCIL POLICY Subject: Policy Effective Number Date Page SELECTION OF PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANTS 401 8-28-79 3 of 3 5. When the anticipated fee exceeds $25,000, the recommendation of the Review Board should also be reviewed and acted upon by the appropriate public board/commission, or Council Liaison Committee prior to submittal to the city Council. B. Intermediate Projects - Anticipated fee between $5,000 - $25,000 1. Affected department(s) should utilize procedures noted above and solicit proposals from a minimum of three (3) qualified consultants. C. Minor Projects - Anticipated fee under $5,000 1. The department heads shall maintain current files on qualified consultants in appropriate categories. The department shall, by telephone or letter, contact at least three (3) qualified consultants and request them to submit a proposal. 2. The department head shall make a selection based upon the criteria noted in Section A and forward a recommendation to the City Manager. Renewal of Contracts with Professional Consultants Requests to the City Manager/City Council to renew an existing contract with a professional consultant should include an evaluation of the work performed by the consultant as well as determination that the fees being charged are comparable to similar services offered by other consultants. If the fee of the renewed contract does not exceed $25,000, the city Manager may execute the agreement. If the fee exceeds $25,000, the request will be placed on the Council agenda. Revised: 4-23-91 CONTRACTS EXECUTED BY CITYMANAGER SINCE 7/01/91 DATE DESCRIPTION 7/27/90 Heimberger/Hirsch & Associates (for design of Twila Reid play area) - $7,200 9/13/90 Ralph Allen & Partners (for daycare structure at Ben Franklin Elementary School) - $8,000 9/18/90 BSI Consultants (for Heritage Trail project) - $4,500 10/04/90 Robert Bein, William Frost (for lot line adjustment for Arena) - $3,000 11/19/90 Anaheim Interfaith Shelter (for homeless shelter) - $10,000 grant 11/19/90 Volunteer Center of North Orange County (for "Helping Hands" outreach program) - $10,000 grant 11/19/90 Stop Gap, Inc. (for drama therapy services) - $4,500 11/19/90 Anaheim Independencia Community Center (for community center services) - $4,000 11/19/90 Women's Transitional Living Center (for bilingual client advocate services) - $3,000 grant 11/19/90 Covering Wings (for blanket distribution to the homeless) - $2,000 grant 11/19/90 Anaheim Family YMCA (for program operating services) - $10,000 grant 11/19/90 YWCA of Orange County (for Anaheim youth employment services) - $4,500 grant 11/19/90 Boys & Girls Club of Anaheim (for youth social services) - $10,000 grant 11/19/90 Volunteer Center of North Orange County (for "Helping Hands" homemaker outreach program) - $6,000 grant -2- 11/19/90 Tomkinson & Associates, Inc. (for employment interview training) - $6,000 11/28/90 Todd O'Neill (for production of video for Project S.A.Y. Kids in Action) - $4,000 01/15/91 Josephson Institute of Ethics (for seminar on ethics) - $5,000 01/24/91 R.W. Beck & Associates (for management audit services) - $18,000 02/20/91 RJA Management Services, Inc. (for recruitment and screening of candidates for conservation coordinator) - $10,000 02/20/91 City of Placentia (for restriping agreement for Melrose Ave./Blue Gum Street) - $1,500 02/21/91 RMWPaleo Associates (for archaeological monitoring per EIR for Arena) - $9,900 02/21/91 Donald H. Maynor (for legal services) - hourly rate for services 03/07/91 Weight Watchers of Orange County & San Diego County (for "At Work" city employees' program) - $119 per participant