Loading...
93-183 RESOLUTION NO. 93R- 183 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A CERTIFICATION APPLICATION TO THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, ADOPTING REGULATIONS THAT ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION'S BASIC SERVICE RATE RULES AND REGULATIONS, AND ESTABLISHING CERTAIN PROCEDURAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS WHICH PROVIDE A REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE VIEWS OF INTERESTED PARTIES IN RATE REGULATION PROCEEDINGS TAKEN HEREUNDER WHEREAS, the Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 (the "1992 Cable Act") provides, in relevant part, that franchising authorities can regulate the rates for Basic Cable Service, as defined in the 1992 Cable Act, in accordance with Basic Service Rate regulations prescribed by the Federal Communications Commission (the "Commission") upon certification by the Commission; and WHEREAS, the Commission has adopted final rules and regulations implementing Section 623 of the 1992 Cable Act in the Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, MM Docket 92-2266, Released May 3, 1993, effective September 1, 1993; and WHEREAS, a franchising authority seeking jurisdiction to regulate Basic Service Rates, as defined in the 1992 Cable Act, must obtain authorization from the Commission to so regulate; and WHEREAS, to receive such approval, the franchising authority must file a written certification with the Commission certifying that: 1. The franchising authority will adopt and administer regulations with respect to the rates subject to regulation under Section 623 of the 1992 Cable Act that are consistent with the regulations prescribed by the Commission thereunder; and 2. The franchising authority has the legal authority to adopt, and the personnel to administer, such regulations; and 3. Procedural laws and regulations applicable to rate regulation proceedings have been adopted, or will be adopted, by such franchising authorities which provide a reasonable opportunity for consideration of the views of interested parties; and 3859.1\EEGAN\Septembel- 9, 1993 WHEREAS, the City of Anaheim, as the governing body, hereby desires to authorize the city Manager, or his (her) designee, to file on its behalf all necessary forms, documents, and otherwise with the Commission which are necessary and proper to allow it to regulate Basic Service Rates, as defined in the 1992 Cable Act to initiate federal regulation of Cable Programming Services rates; and WHEREAS, the city of Anaheim now desires to adopt regulations with respect to the regulation of Basic Service Rates which are consistent with the regulations prescribed by the Commission and to adopt procedural laws and regulations applicable to rate regulation proceedings which provide a reasonable opportunity for consideration of the views of interested parties; and WHEREAS, NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Anaheim does hereby resolve as follows: SECTION 1. Under the law of the United States, the Constitution and Statutes of the State of California, and the ordinances, agreements, and procedures of the City of Anaheim, the City of Anaheim possesses the legal authority to adopt the regulations contained herein. SECTION 2. The City of Anaheim possesses sufficient personnel to administer the regulations adopted herein. SECTION 3. The City of Anaheim has no actual knowledge that the cable system, or cable systems, operating in its jurisdiction are subject to Effective Competition and thus, based upon the presumption established in Section 76.609 of the Code of Federal Regulations, ("CFR"), the cable operator, or cable operators, operating within its jurisdiction are not subject to Effective Competition. SECTION 4. The City Manager, or his or her designee, are hereby authorized, empowered, and instructed to file necessary and proper forms, certifications, documents, and otherwise as prescribed in CFR Section 76.610 with the Commission by (1) registered or certified mail, return receipt requested; or (2) hand delivery to the Commission and a date stamp copy obtained. A copy of the certification form described herein shall be served on the cable operator, or cable operators, on or before the date 3859.1\EEGAN\September 9, 19~ said certification form is filed with the commission. In addition, the City Manager is authorized to execute and file any forms or submissions necessary to initiate federal regulation of Cable Programming Service rates. SECTION 5. Upon certification by the Commission, the City Manager shall give, by registered mail, return receipt requested, or hand delivery, written notification to the cable operator or cable operators that the city of Anaheim has been so certified to so regulate Basic Service Rates, and the cable operator or cable operators shall thereby be directed, pursuant to CFR Section 76.930, to file a schedule of rates for the Basic Service Tier and associated equipment with the City of Anaheim within thirty (30) days, as provided in CFR Section 76.930, or such other period as provided by law. SECTION 6. Upon receipt of the schedule of rates for the Basic Service Tier and associated equipment as provided in Section 5 above from the cable operator or cable operators, such schedule of rates and charges shall be referred to the City Manager for review and evaluation pursuant to the substantive and procedural standards set forth in CFR Subsection 76.900-76.985 and the Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in MM Docket 92-266. SECTION 7. After a cable operator or cable operators have submitted for review their existing rates for the Basic Service Tier and associated equipment costs, or proposed changes in these rates (including increases in the base line channel charge that results from reductions in the number of channels in a tier), the existing rates will remain in effect or the proposed rates will become effective after thirty (30) days from the date of submission; provided, however, that the city may hold this thirty (30) day deadline for an additional time by issuing a brief written order as provided in CFR Section 76.933(b) or within thirty (30) days of the date of submission, explaining that it needs additional time to review the rates. SECTION 8. If the City Council is unable to determine, based upon the material submitted by the cable operator, that the existing or proposed rates are within the Commission's permitted basic service tier charge or actual cost-of-equipment as defined in CFR Subsection 76.922 and 76.923, or if a cable operator has submitted a cost of service showing pursuant to Subsection ~859.1\EEGAN\Septembe~ 9, 76.937(c) and 76.924, seeking to justify a rate above the Commission's Basic Service Tier charge as defined in CFR Subsection 76.922 and 76.923, the city Council may toll the thirty (30) day deadline in Section 7 above, to request and/or consider additional information and to consider the comments from interest parties, as follows: (a) For an additional ninety (90) days in cases not involving cost-of-service showing; or (b) For an additional one hundred fifty (150) days in cases involving cost-of-service showings. SECTION 9. If the City Council has availed itself of the additional ninety (90) or one hundred fifty (150) days permitted above, and has taken no action within these additional time periods, then the proposed rates will go into effect at the end of the ninety (90) or one hundred fifty (150) day periods, or existing rates will remain in effect as such times, subject to refunds if the City Council subsequently issues a written decision disapproving any portion of such rates; provided, however, that in order to order refunds, the City Manager or his designee shall issue a brief, written order to the cable operator or cable operators by the end of the ninety (90) or one hundred fifty (150) day period permitted above, directing the cable operator or cable operators to keep an accurate account of all amounts received by reason of the rate in issue and on whose behalf such amounts were paid. SECTION 10. Upon receipt of a submission by a cable operator or cable operators pursuant to Section 5 above, the City Clerk shall give public notice by way of publication of said submission in a newspaper of general circulation in the jurisdiction within fourteen (14) days of receipt by the City of Anaheim thereof. Said publication notice shall state, in substance, that the city of Anaheim is considering the submission of the cable operator reproduced therein, the date of submission by the cable operator, that said rates will become effective within thirty (30) days from the date of submission unless the City Council extends the review time pursuant to Section 8 above, and that interested parties may file written comments with the city Clerk within seven (7) days of publication. SECTION 11. If, and to the extent, the city Council extends the review period pursuant to Section 8 above, it shall then act upon the rate submission only at a public hearing which has been duly ~859.1\EEGAN\$eptember 9, 1~3 advertised and noticed pursuant to the requirements of Government Code Section 6066. At said noticed public hearing, which may be continued from time to time, all interested parties including, but not limited to, subscribers, shall possess a reasonable opportunity to express their views regarding the matters before the city Council. SECTION 12. The city Council shall issue a written decision in a rate-making proceeding whenever it disapproves an initial rate for the Basic Service Tier or associated equipment, in whole or in part, disapproves a request for a rate increase in whole or in part, or approves a request for an increase in whole or in part over the objections of interested parties. The city of Anaheim is not required to issue a written decision that approves an unopposed existing or proposed rate for the basic service tier or associated equipment. Any written decision required herein shall be issued and released only at an open and public meeting of the city Council, and the text shall be made available for public distribution at the offices of the City Clerk during normal business hours commencing the next business day after adoption by the City Council. SECTION 13. These regulations may be amended from time to time by the City Council, with or without the concurrence or consent of the cable operator or cable operators affected thereby. SECTION 14. If, and to the extent, a cable operator or cable operators submits a cost-of-service showing pursuant to CFR Subsection 76.937(c) and 76.924 seeking to justify a rate above the Commission s Basic Service Tier charge as defined in CFR Subsection 76.922 and 76.923, the city Council will, within ninety (90) days of the date of submission, adopt rules, regulations, and procedures consistent with the rules and regulations of the Commission relating to the procedural and substantive criteria to be applied by the City Council to said cost-of-service submission. SECTION 15. The City shall possess all remedies available to it under federal, state, and local law including, but not limited to, those remedies provided in CFR Subsection 76.940-76.943. 3859.1\EEGAN\September 9, 1993 THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim this 14~h day of September , 1993. AYES: Feldhaus, Hunter, Simpson, Daly NOES: None ABSENT: Pickler MAYOR O/T~EHECl~fO~EIM ATTEST: CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM . EME:lm 3859.1\EEGAl~\Septembe~ 9, 1993 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 93R-183 was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the Anaheim City Council held on the 14th day of September, 1993, by the following vote oi" the members thereof: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Feldhaus, Hunter,, Simpson, Daly NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler ~1~ AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said Resolution No. 93R-183 on the 15th day of September, 1993. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this 15th day of September, 1993. CiTY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (SEAL) I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Cleck of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 93R-183 was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim on September 14, 1993. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM