Resolution-PC 2010-063RESOLUTION NO. PC2010 -063
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
DETERMINING THAT A PREVIOUSLY- APPROVED MITGITATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION IS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006 -05121
(TRACKING NO. CUP2006- 05121B) AND AMENDING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF
RESOLUTION NO. PC2006 -84
(DEV2010- 00039)
(2411 -2461 W. LA PALMA AVENUE AND 1212 N. HUBBELL WAY)
WHEREAS, on October 2, 2006, the Anaheim City Planning Commission
(hereinafter referred to as "Planning Commission"), by its Resolution No. PC2006 -84 did
approve Conditional Use Permit 2006 -05121 to permit and retain a teleconferencing center and
private conference /training center for that certain real property located at 2411 West La Palma
Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as more particularly
shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, on December 7, 2009, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution
No. PC2009 -121 did approve an amendment to Conditional Use Permit 2006 -05121 to permit
the conversion of an existing warehouse to a two -story office building for an adult/career training
center in conjunction with the previously- approved teleconferencing center for that certain real
property located at 1212 N. Hubbell Way; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition to amend
Conditional Use Permit No. 2006 -05121 to permit the establishment of an educational institution
(West Coast University) to provide vocational training within an existing three -story office
building located on the subject property; and
WHEREAS, this property is developed with a total of eight buildings and
includes an adult/career training center in conjunction with a teleconferencing center and office
buildings. The property is located in the I (Industrial) zone and the Anaheim General Plan
designates the property for Industrial land uses; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on August 2, 2010, at 5 :00 p.m., notice of said public hearing
having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the
Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60, to hear and consider evidence for and against the
proposed amendment to said conditional use permit (tracking number CUP2006- 05121B)
and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing with respect to the request for a conditional use permit, does find and
determine the following facts:
1 PC20] 0 -063
1. The request to amend said conditional use permit to allow a vocational college
within an existing three -story office building is properly one for which a conditional use permit
is authorized under Code Section Nos. 18.10.030.040.0402 (Educational Institutions) of the
Anaheim Municipal Code.
2. The proposed amendment to the conditional use permit to establish an
educational institution for vocational training, as conditioned herein, would not adversely affect
the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be
located because the building is surrounded by and integrated with similar buildings and uses; and
the proposed vocational school is located within an existing office building located on the
interior of the parcel with no adverse affects to adjoining land uses.
3. The size and shape of the site for the use is adequate to allow the full development
of the vocational school within an existing office building in a manner not detrimental to the
particular area or to the health and safety because the proposed vocational school will be located
within the existing 3- story, office building. In addition, the project requires a total of 1,934
parking spaces and 2,136 spaces are proposed. Therefore, the proposed project complies with
Code required parking.
4. The traffic generated by the vocational college will not impose an undue burden
upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the
traffic generated by this use will not exceed the assumptions included in the updated 2010
Traffic Impact and Parking Study prepared by KOA Corporation or require additional mitigation
measures from those already included in Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 139 in conjunction with
the original conditional use permit.
5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not
be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as the proposed
land use will continue to be compatible with the surrounding area because the use is integrated
with other uses on the property and is not a health or safety risk to the citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission has
reviewed the proposal and does hereby find that a previously- approved Mitigated Negative
Declaration in connection with Conditional Use Permit No. 2006 -05121 and Mitigation
Monitoring Plan No. 139 is adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation in
connection with this request.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission, for the reasons
hereinabove stated does hereby approve the amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-
05121 (tracking number CUP2006- 05121B) to permit the establishment of an educational
institution (West Coast University) to provide vocational training within an existing three -story
office building located on the subject property.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby
amend, in their entirety, the conditions of approval adopted in connection with Planning
Commission Resolution No. PC2006 -84, approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05121, as
- 2 - PC2010 -063
previously amended, to read as stated in Exhibit `B" attached hereto and incorporated by this
reference which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the
subject property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the
City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted
in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, except as expressly amended herein, the
provisions of Resolution No. PC2006 -84, approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2006- 05121, as
previously amended, shall remain if full force and effect.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this permit is approved without limitations
on the hours of operation or the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations
of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit
Approval) and 18.60.200 (City- Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Anaheim
Municipal Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon
applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any
such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of
any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained,
shall be deemed null and void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes
approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal
Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not
include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other
applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all
charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the
issuance of the final invoice. Failure to pay alI charges shall result in the revocation of the
approval of this application.
meeting of August 2, 2010.
ATTEST:
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
SENIOR SECRE • RY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
3 PC2010 -063
STA'I'E OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim
City Planning Commission held on August 2, 2010, by the following vote of the members
thereof:
AGARWAL, AMENT, FAESSEL, KARAKI, PERSAUD,
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: RAMIREZ, SEYMOUR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 2° day of August, 2010.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
4 - PC2010 -063
EXHIBIT "A"
DEV2010 -00039
I AP N: 071-061-27
F� -t
193.02'
CO
ca
c)
N
163'
CO
uO
h
r
C3)
co
779.85°
W LA PALMA AVE
CO
CO
CO
1
EEO
Source: Recorded Tract Maps and/or City GIS.
Please note the accuracy is +1- two to five feet.
10952
-5
PC2010 -063
NO.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
REVIEW
BY
SIGNED
OFF BY
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT
1
The business shall be equipped with an alarm system (silent
or audible).
Police
(
Provide comprehensive security alarm system for the
following:
• Perimeter building and access route protection.
• High valued storage areas.
Interior building door to shipping and receiving area
Police
3
Complete a Burglary/Robbery Alarm Permit application,
Form APD 516, and return it to the Police Department prior
to initial alarm activation. This form is available at the
Police Department front counter, or it can be downloaded
from the following web site:
http:/ /www.anaheim.net /article.asp ?id =678
Police
4
Closed circuit television (CCTV) security cameras are
recommended, with the following coverage areas:
• Lobby entrances
• Building perimeter
Police
5
If security cameras are not monitored, signs indicating so
should be placed at each camera.
Police
6
CCTV monitor and recorders should be secured in a separate
locked compartment to prevent theft or, or tampering with,
the tape.
Police
7
CCTV recording should be kept for a minimum of 30 days
before being recorded over.
Police
8
CCTV videotapes should not be recorded over more than 10
items per tape. Use of digital recording equipment as an
alternative to videotape is encouraged.
Police
9
Address numbers shall be positioned so as to be readily
readable from the street. Numbers should be visible during
hours of darkness.
Police
EXHIBIT `B"
AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006-05121
(TRACKING NO. CUP 2006- 05121B)
(DEV2010- 00039)
6
PC2010 -063
10
Rooftop address numbers for the police helicopter.
Minimum size 4' in height and 2' in width. The lines of the
numbers are to be a minimum of 6" thick. Numbers should
be spaced 12" to 18" apart. Numbers should be painted or
constructed in a contrasting color to the roofing material.
Numbers should face the street to which the structure is
addressed. Numbers are not to be visible from the ground
level.
Police
11
Industrial, commercial, institutional, or office buildings shall
have clearly marked doors with numbers corresponding to
the alarm zones, if any. The identification of alarm zone
coverage will assist responding police and security units in
faster'identification and apprehension of potential suspects, if
any.
Police
12
All exterior doors to have adequate security hardware, e.g.
deadbolt locks.
Police
13
Overhead roll -up doors shall also be secured on the inside
that the lock cannot be defeated from the outside and shall be
secured with a cylinder lock or padlock from the inside.
Police
14
A Knox box shall be installed at hatchway to allow
Police/Fire access to interior.
Police
15
Monument signs and addresses shall be well lighted during
hours of darkness.
Police
16
Adequate lighting of parking lots and associated carports,
shipping and receiving areas, driveways, circulation areas,
aisles, passageways, recesses, and grounds contiguous to
buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage
to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the
presence of any person on or about the premises during the
hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for
all person, property, and vehicles on -site.
Police
17
All exterior doors shall have their own light source, which
shall adequately illuminate door areas at all hours to make
clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the
premises and provide adequate illumination for persons
exiting the building.
Police
18
Landscaping shall be of the type and situated in locations to
maximize observation while providing the desired degree of
aesthetics. Security planting materials are encouraged along
fence and property lines and under vulnerable windows
Police
7
PC2010 -063
19
All exterior doors shall have their own light source, which
shall adequately illuminate door areas at all hours to make
clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the
premises and provide adequate illumination for persons
exiting the building.
Police
20
All entrances to parking areas shall be posted with
appropriate signs per 22658(a) C.V.C., to assist in removal of
vehicles at the property owners /managers request.
Police
21
Compliance with AMC 6016, the Anaheim Public Safety
Radio System Coverage Ordinance is required. A copy of
the ordinance and compliance specifications is attached. The
ordinance can also be viewed online through the City of
Anaheim web site.
Police
22
"No Trespassing 602(k) P.C." posted at the entrances of
parking lots /structures and located in other appropriate
places. Signs must be at least 2'x1' in overall size, with
white background and black 2" lettering.
Police
23
Classroom doors should be equipped with locks that can be
locked from the inside, allowing lockdown of those rooms in
the event of criminal activity in, or around, the building.
Police
24
File Emergency Listing Card, Form APD -281, with the
Police Department, available at the Police Department front
counter, or it can be downloaded from the following web
site: http://www.anaheim.net/article.asp?id=678.
Police
GENERAL CONDITIONS
25
This facility shall be used for vocational training purposes
only.
Planning
26
On -going during project operation, no required parking area
shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for outdoor storage.
Code
Enforcement
27
No church activities shall be permitted unless a separate
conditional use permit is approved by the City,
Planning
28
No outdoor activities involving gathering of persons shall be
permitted on -site.
Code
Enforcement
29
The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the area
adjacent to the premises over which they have control, in an
orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance
and removal of trash or debris. Any graffiti painted or
marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the
control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over
within 24 hours of being applied.
Code
Enforcement
8
PC2010 -063
30
The developer shall be responsible for compliance with all
mitigation measures within the assigned time frames and any
direct costs associated with the attached Mitigation
Planning
Monitoring Program No. 139 as established by the City of
Anaheim and as required by Section 21081.6 of the Public
Resources Code to ensure implementation of those identified
mitigation measures.
31
The property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications submitted to the City of
Planning
Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with
the Planning Department marked Exhibit No. 1 (Site Plan),
Exhibit No. 2 (Floor Plan), and as conditioned herein.
- 9 - PC2010 -063