RES-2010-188 RESOLUTION NO. 2010- 188
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
NO. 2008 -00471 PERTAINING TO SEVERAL ELEMENTS OF
THE ANAHEIM GENERAL PLAN.
(REVISED PLATINUM TRIANGLE EXPANSION PROJECT)
WHEREAS, the Platinum Triangle comprises approximately 820 acres located at
the confluence of Interstate 5 and SR -57 Freeways in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California, generally east of Interstate 5 Freeway, west of the Santa Ana River channel
and SR -57 Freeway, south of the Southern California Edison easement, and north of the
Anaheim City limit area. The Platinum Triangle encompasses the Angel Stadium of Anaheim,
the Honda Center, the Grove of Anaheim, the Anaheim Amtrak/Metrolink Station, and
surrounding residential and mixed use development, light industrial buildings, industrial parks,
distribution facilities, offices, hotels, restaurants, and retail development; and
WHEREAS, since 1996, the Anaheim City Council (the "City Council ") has
approved several actions relating to the area encompassed by the Platinum Triangle; and
WHEREAS, on May 30, 1996, the Anaheim City Planning Commission (the
"Planning Commission ") certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 320 and adopted Area
Development Plan No. 120 for that portion of the Stadium property associated with the
Sportstown Development. Area Development Plan No. 120, which entitled a total of 119,543
seats for new and /or renovated stadiums, 750,000 square feet of urban entertainment /retail uses,
a 500 -room hotel (550,000 square feet), a 150,000- square -foot exhibition center, 250,000 square
feet of office development and 15,570 on -site parking spaces. The Grove of Anaheim, the
renovated Angel Stadium of Anaheim, and the Stadium Gateway Office Building were
developed/ renovated under this plan; and
WHEREAS, on March 2, 1999, the City Council adopted the Anaheim Stadium
Area Master Land Use Plan (MLUP). The boundaries for this MLUP were generally the same as
those for the Platinum Triangle, with the exception that this MLUP included 15 acres adjacent to
I -5 that are not a part of the current Platinum Triangle boundaries. As part of the approval
process for the Anaheim Stadium Area MLUP, the City Council also certified Final
Environmental Impact Report No. 321 and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106.
Development within the Anaheim Stadium Area was implemented through the Sports
Entertainment (SE) Overlay Zone, which permitted current uses to continue or expand within the
provisions of the existing zoning, while providing those who may want to develop sports,
entertainment, retail, and office uses with standards appropriate to those uses, including
increased land use intensity. Implementation of this Overlay Zone was projected to result in a net
loss of 491,303 square feet of industrial space and increases of 1,871,285 square feet of new
office space, 452,026 square feet of new retail space, and 991,603 square feet of new hotel space.
Projects that were developed under the SE Overlay Zone included the Ayers Hotel, the Arena
Corporate Center, and the Westwood School of Technology; and
-1-
WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council approved a comprehensive
citywide General Plan and Zoning Code Update, which included a new vision for the Platinum
Triangle. The General Plan Update changed the General Plan designations within the project area
from Commercial Recreation and Business Office /Mixed Use /Industrial to Mixed -Use, Office -
High, Office -Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional to provide opportunities for existing
uses to transition to mixed -use, residential, office, and commercial uses. The General Plan
Update also established the overall maximum development intensity for the Platinum Triangle,
which permitted up to 9,175 dwelling units, 5,000,000 square feet of office space, 2,044,300
square feet of commercial uses, industrial development at a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of
0.50, and institutional development at a maximum FAR of 3.0. In addition, the square
footage /seats allocated to the existing Honda Center and all of the development intensity entitled
by Area Development Plan No. 120 was incorporated into the Platinum Triangle Mixed -Use land
use designation. Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, which was prepared for the
General Plan and Zoning Code Update and associated actions, analyzed the above development
intensities on a citywide impact level and adopted mitigation monitoring programs, including an
Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106 for the Platinum Triangle; and
WHEREAS, in order to provide the implementation tools necessary to realize the
City's new vision for the Platinum Triangle, on August 17, 2004, the City Council replaced the
Anaheim Stadium Area MLUP with the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (the
"PTMLUP "), replaced the SE Overlay Zone with the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU)
Overlay Zone, approved the form of the Standardized Platinum Triangle Development
Agreement and approved associated zoning reclassifications. Under these updated zoning
regulations, property owners desiring to develop under the PTMU Overlay Zone provisions are
required to enter into a standardized Development Agreement with the City of Anaheim; and
WHEREAS, on October 25, 2005, the City Council adopted and certified the
Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR) No. 332 including Updated and
Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106A for the PTMLUP and associated actions, which
utilized Final Environmental Impact Report No. 321 (adopted for the Anaheim Stadium MLUP,
as discussed above) and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106. At the present time, Final
Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 332 serves as the primary environmental
document for subsequent land use actions within the Platinum Triangle, including necessary
infrastructure improvements and all local discretionary approvals requested to implement the
PTMLUP, consistent with Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines. The General Plan
Amendment associated with Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 332 increased
the allowable development intensity within the Platinum Triangle to 9,500 residential units;
5,000,000 square feet of office uses; and 2,254,400 square feet of commercial uses; and
WHEREAS, since the approval and certification of Final Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report No. 332, the majority of the permitted development intensity on
private properties analyzed by said SEIR has been either developed, is under construction or has
been designated for development under approved Development Agreements. In addition, City
Council has approved two addendums to Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No.
332 in conjunction with requests to increase the Platinum Triangle intensity by 67 residential
units; 55,550 square feet of office development; and, 10,000 square feet of commercial uses. A
-2-
project Environmental Impact Report has also been approved to increase the allowable
development intensity by an additional 699 residential units to bring the total allowable
development intensity within the Platinum Triangle to up to 10,266 residential units; 5,055,550
square feet of office uses; and 2,264,400 square feet of commercial uses; and
WHEREAS, in order to increase the overall densities within the Platinum
Triangle to accommodate market demands for increased densities, and to further the project
objectives outlines above, on February 13, 2007, the City embarked upon a process to adopt a
General Plan Amendment; amendments to the PTMLUP, PTMU Overlay Zone, and the Platinum
Triangle Standardized Development; and related zoning reclassifications to increase the
development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to up to 18,363 residential units; 5,657,847
square feet of commercial uses; 16,819,015 square feet of office uses; and 1,500,000 square feet
of institutional uses (the "Platinum Triangle Expansion Project "); and
WHEREAS, as required by law, the City prepared an environmental impact report
in connection with the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project. The Draft Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report for the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, DSEIR No. 334, and
was first circulated for a 45 -day public review period from July 12, 2007 to August 27, 2007. On
October 4, 2007, the City released the DSEIR No. 334 for an additional 45 -day public review.
The recirculated DSEIR No. 334 contained minor revisions to the Project Description and
additional traffic information based on comments received from the City of Orange and
California Department of Transportation. Other minor revisions to the DSEIR were made based
on other comments received on the previously circulated DSEIR No. 334. The recirculated
FSEIR No. 334 was approved in December 2007 and reapproved in April 2008; and
WHEREAS, following the approval of FSEIR No. 334, a lawsuit was filed
challenging the adequacy of FSEIR No. 334. In consideration of the City's exemplary historical
record in avoiding CEQA litigation and its commitment to proper environmental review, the City
Council repealed the approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, including FSEIR No.
334 and various related actions, and directed staff to prepare a new Subsequent Environmental
Impact Report for the project; and
WHEREAS, on October 14, 2008, the City Council initiated (i) General Plan
Amendment No. 2008 - 00471; (ii) Zoning Code Amendment No. 2008 - 00074; (iii) an
amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, including the Platinum Triangle
Standardized Development Agreement Form (MIS2008- 00283); (iv) Reclassification No. 2008-
00222; (v) Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 2008 - 00339; and (vi) Water Supply
Assessment (MIS2008- 00234) pertaining to the Platinum Triangle (collectively referred to herein
as the "Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project "); and
-3-
WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2008 -00471 proposes to amend the
Anaheim General Plan as follows:
1. Land Use Element
(a) Amend "Figure LU -4: Land Use Plan" of the Land Use
Element of the General Plan as shown on Attachments "A -1"
and "A -2" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference.
(b) Amend "Table LU -4: General Plan Density Provisions for
Specific Areas of the City" of the Land Use Element of the
General Plan as shown on Attachment "A -3" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
2. Circulation Element
(a) Amend "Figure C -1: Planned Roadway Network" of the
Circulation Element of the General Plan as shown on
Attachments "B-1" and "B -2" attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference.
(b) Amend "Figure C -5: Existing and Proposed Bicycle
Facilities" of the Circulation Element of the General Plan as
shown on Attachments "C -1" and "C -2" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
3. Green Element
(a) Amend "Figure G -1: Green Plan" of the Green Element of
the General Plan as shown on Attachments "D -1" and "D -2"
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
4. Public Services and Facilities Element
(a) Amend "Figure PSF -1: Fire and Police Facilities Map" of
the Public Services and Facilities Element of the General Plan
as shown on Attachments "E -1" and "E -2" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission (hereinafter referred to as
"Planning Commission ") did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on
October 11, 2010, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required
by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and
consider evidence for and against said amendment to the General Plan, designated as General
-4-
Plan Amendment No. 2008 - 00471, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations
in conjunction therewith; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, the Planning Commission did adopt its
Resolution No. PC2010 -106 containing a report of its findings, a summary of the evidence
presented at said hearing, and recommending that General Plan Amendment No. 2008 -00471 be
adopted by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of said Resolution No. PC2010 -106, summary of
evidence, report of findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, the City Council
did fix the 26th day of October, 2010, as the time, and the City Council Chamber in the Civic
Center as the place for a public hearing on said proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2008-
00471 and did give notice thereof in the manner and as provided by law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did hold and conduct such public hearing and did
give all persons interested therein an opportunity to be heard, and did receive evidence and
reports and did consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the proposal to amend the General
Plan, designated as General Plan Amendment No. 2008 - 00471, and does hereby find and
determine, based upon its independent review and analyses of Environmental Impact Report No.
2008 -00339 prepared in connection with the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, and
the requirements of California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA "), that Environmental Impact
Report No. 2008 -00339 is adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for
said proposed General Plan Amendment and satisfies all the requirements of CEQA; and that no
further environmental documentation need be prepared for the proposed General Plan
Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council does find and determine that General Plan
Amendment No. 2008 - 00471, as described above, should be approved, and that the evidence
presented shows that all of the conditions exist as set forth in Subsection .030 of Section
18.68.050 of the Anaheim Municipal Code for the following reasons:
1. That the evidence presented substantiates the need for the proposed
amendments to the Anaheim General Plan as the proposed changes would result in additional
development opportunities within the boundaries of the Platinum Triangle and provide
appropriate street widths, consistent with the General Plan goals and policies for that area.
2. That the proposed amendments are consistent with the General Plan goals and
policies.
3. That the proposed amendments maintain the internal consistency of the
General Plan.
4. That the proposed amendments would not be detrimental to the public interest,
health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.
-5-
5. That the proposed amendments would maintain the balance of land uses
within the City.
6. That the subject property proposed to be designated to new land uses, as
depicted on Attachment A -2, is physically suitable to accommodate the proposed modification,
including, but not limited to, access, physical constraints, topography, provision of utilities, and
compatibility with surrounding land uses as said is intended for a mix of land uses.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Anaheim that General Plan Amendment No. 2008 -00471 be, and the same is hereby, approved.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the City Council
of the City of Anaheim this 26thday of October , 2010, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Pringle, Council Members Sidhu, Hernandez
NOES: Council Members Galloway, Kring
ABSENT: NONE
ABSTAIN: NONE
CITY OF ANAHEIM
By:
MA OR OF THE C ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF A AHEIM
79746.v I /MGordon
-6-
Exhibit A -1
Existing Land Use Plan
Figure LU -4
sr C A W ■_
, gotta egger )411111 i , /
______ , limmist, pp ! B it- i :.
la
„..... 1.1 imm_... s.," kr - • \ -4. V. -- ' e
I :ii _
„ A IN •�
1 . T - ter. .
T j!flhU N
Bela 7 -
N MIMS 950
s
' ' i '
if
.
aeesar It oee4ulien === LEM sleet Reeege.isd
Mined t –r— Rimed
olice- Leer Q Plan,aope Noway
oaoe- KG L: air Mmilory
eeerret
All ee.ie,a
ill cols sacs
NM Pubic PIM
> ,j,. 11=5 E, ALA\ Lill AUY_ LITR IAH8L E
City of Anaheim, CA = 0_
' :*r.
Exhibit A -2
Proposed Land Use Plan
Figure LU -4
.. ■
{. Oi * —
w lW
mooliktuil III
�M ■ a
. NI 1111111111111111111 dm,
‘ 111111 'i'4
ii _ -'_ it ::: .... :u : _.. f - - ,, Ii m��� 1' U ri
TM 11111 . , .. ionnetrers
q 0 1
-4, -
•
"t• vign= "Litilloy. I,
.,
.
L o5 57.Y15 95O i
® :. i , !
General Plan Designation =_= Levis street Realignment
tdlt Use —I— Ratkoai
isill OttOce - Lao PtauMint Triangle Bollnaary
up atm- Nigh City Boundary
truism
insatutenai
Wen Scace
- PLtac Parks
mii Wale' Uses
0
'A THE PL&VII[iCLDH
t�_ City of Anaheim, CA t, ..- .
YIZA
Exhibit A -
Table LU -4: General Plan Density Provisions for Specific Areas of the City
Location General Plan Land Use Designations Permitted Density
The Mountain Park Low Medium Hillside Density Residential 485
Area (Up to 6 du/ac)
Low Medium Density Residential 2,015
(Up to 16 du /ac) (Up to 2,500 dwelling units)
Area "A"
(Parcel Map Low- Medium Density Residential Up to 140 dwelling units
94 -205)
The Disneyland Resort
Specific Plan (SP92 1) Commercial Recreation See Note No. 1 on next page
Area
The Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan (SP92-2) Commercial Recreation See Note No. 2 on next page
Area
Hotel Circle Specific
Plan (SP93 -1) Area Commercial Recreation The Hotel Circle Specific Plan allows for a
master planned hotel project including up to 969
hotel rooms and integrated guest oriented
amenities including full- service restaurants,
conference room/banquet facilities, pool and spa
areas, tour bus /shuttle facilities, and pedestrian
promenades and plaza areas with comprehensive
landscaping
The Platinum Triangle Mixed -Use
Area
Residential 18,909 dwelling units
Commercial 4,909,682 square feet
Office 9,862,166 square feet
Institutional 1,500,000 square feet
Office -High and Office -Low 4,478,356 square feet*
Institutional 3.0 FAR
Industrial 0.5 FAR
Open Space 0.1 FAR
*The maximum FAR for properties designated Office -Low is 0.5; the maximum FAR for properties designated
Office -High is 2.0
The Stonegate Low Density Residential Up to 35 dwelling units
Development Area
Exhibit B -1
Existing Planned Roadway Network
Figure C -1
I i 7
/
3 1
- X _ �.. i 1`r Mw i i f
j .
\ \4411.44 NL '
+. � j r
f i
\ \ 6 . 5.
A t
71\1‘11. •
t O0
i ? ril L..r --'„"
The Roadway Network
atraLLEINILLIMIL Primary Arteral —I—f Passenger and Commuter Rail
— , 8 Lanes, Divided wow 6 Lam, Div 'den • Freeway
Stadium Area Smartstreet -- 4 Lanes, Divided Platinum Triangle Boundary
so • I 8 Lanes. Divided Zzauslathgenal
-- -
6 Lanes, Divided 4 Lanes City Boundary
Major Arterial Cdlarror Street
arm 8 Lanes, Divided moo 2 Lanes
— 6 Lanes, Divided
v
City of Anaheim, CA v:
Exhibit B -2
Proposed Planned Roadway Network
Figure C -1
/ e
i
8
¢a 3 S
1
f 1I
r
r -- - a rer Ave 41qt r
/ V
I� A .. wa • i
naM r
CL M rr
l
r 5.
7
. zed ' • 1
NI ...... _ IINAfr ' 0
: iui
-.....-- ----._ 8.... , \ k ,..., ,,,joib,
F---
The Roadwa% Network
Resort Smartstreet Primary Arterial —I—F Passenger and Commuter Rail
8 Lanes. Divided IVA1010r 6 Lanes, Divided — Freeway
Stadium Area Smartstreet °; °-.. 4 Lanes, Divided n Platinum Triangle Boundary
IN r r R Lanes. Divided SemndaryArteriai
■ — • 6 Lanes, Divided 4 Lanes City Boundary
Maio(Arterial Collector Street
www. 8 Lanes, Dvided x,: >„ 2 Lanes
- 6 Lanes, Divided
). DU THE p- L.- TR,,[ii„\k-gLE 0
j •. M
I ' ' +y' -! . =aammng Duaartmorn
I
City of Anaheim, CA January 29,2010
2124
Exhibit C -1
Existing Bicycle Facilities
Figure C -5
1
t3nre.Ar ,
J l.
•
I
. @it ..
\..,. a
/ /
1 ,I * --Ily '
kaiak Ave
$ 's .....\\\,,,,
. IR \\NA. ..... \, //
� �
.1111 It
iMMI
8
1�% ' ti . (N
N�
ion •
0 ZD 500 11000
M iff' 4 F.
r
Existing Class I Bikeway Proposed Top Priority • Existing Bicycle Parking
Class 11 Bikewa ..o.o.» Class II Bikeway
Exisitn
g y A Proposed Bicycle Parking
Proposed 2nd Priority
Existing Class ill Bikeway —
Class II Bikeway * Transit Station
Existing Off Road Trail Proposed 3rd Piority
Proposed Off Road Trail Class II Bikeway II Park-and -Ride
Proposed Top Priority Proposed Top Priority I I Parks/Open Space
Class I Bikeway ..r....« Class Ill Bikeway
Proposed 2nd Priority Proposed 2nd Priority I I School
-- Class I Bikeway Class III Bikeway n Platinum Triangle Boundary
Proposed 3rd Priority Proposed 3rd Priority f ---,
Class I Bikeway Class III Bikeway l _ City Boundary
A
0
II , 3 ,1 1;. T U E P Lr lr O G:� LU �' `� G°3 D G O L LE
i i _ Cary of rwom
'4� Cit f Anaheim, CA Planning Ma ^�
2
Y January 1, 2C'C
Exhibit C -2
Proposed Bicycle Facilities
Figure C -5
�
1 \ ,,////7/7 .. rr. / //
- I
; a1+ i r.. �+ea .
.,
0 •
f .
41,N sil 41 . W.M w. I
:\ff :
/ /
olliS A .. , „ 1/4,, . i
Ite �Cr .
s�
d MILIII 111 .. ..\
0...... : .. ,
0 2a SIX 1,:0C
.� ,�'. l a tttt
wi�.,
I :11.2.. I
Existing Class I Bikeway Proposed Top Priority • Existing Bicycle Parking
Existing Class M ss II Bikeway Class 11 Bikeway
Existing Class Ill Bikeway _ �l� 2nd Priority
• Proposed Bicycle Parking
Class II Bikeway # Transit Station
Existing Off Road Trail Proposed 3rd Piority.
Proposed Off Road Trail Class II Bikeway a Park- and -Ride
Proposed Top Priority Proposed Top Priority I I Parks/Open Space
Class I Bikeway ......»» Class III Bikeway I I Scl,o�
Proposed 2nd Priority — Proposed 2nd Priority
— Class I Bikeway Class III Bikeway I I Platinum Triangle Boundan
Proposed 3rd Priority Proposed 3rd Priority
Class I Bikeway Class III Bikeway I City Boundary
? Li-,6\ Lir 11 MU Ul. 1: 11 A A a - la 0
I , Ali
4i, :.-, :' Ana - 4 -
City of Anaheim, CA ` a''"' ^0D- ' ° ;_ ,;
1. .a ^wary : ..ir
Exhibit D -1
Existing Green Plan
Figure G -1
'/7 ' ,
44
_o__ meilkirr = -
. ird
li'lL' 111 itiofr
11Pen
k--\ .\,, .._...„ 'I--
51k\ Om r Autry Wwi
I 0 L� 50C IAC
it
L1
MIIIIN=1111 Oi .411. , t
- Pak Pads
- OP= SPIce
Ell Walt' then
0 Pat 17l6decy Anse
-- Ridolfilikied, Palms= ad Mmes Bra Tral
Q %liaTronk
ED Gil liosehry
Vesitleeekl awes cubicle half-a& radius of
Neighborhood of Casiity Pat a• quarec-
ale radios of a Mei Part.
1 1 Il11!I 411 THE 11 V 4J L1411J fI+S t:J tiry a1 Manam
YY Planning Daaartmo,
City of Anaheim, CA tanp N
24
Exhibit D-2
Proposed Green Plan
Figure G-1
PIIMIIIIIII r ; ;//
\ --- 1 -
ALF.P. k
I 1
- - -
0 /
. z
Iff
Moor
1111\- il im ,I
..41
. le& ,Nli of
.._.
S.
t'M i
... I
( '
1 1
Ir. r .„..
P .ap
.... 0,... \
11111111.1110
- Public Pub
- OVIdd Scow
- Wader Um
ED P. Deicing Memo
— — Ibibagfilikirg. Mewls and Molloak Bale Trim
I= Plarimo Trio* Bantam
= Cury Boundary
*Residential mar masa hag-mile radius of
Neighborhood or Common* Part or quarter
mile yaw of a Mei Part
J1 li Will T H
, L i
,1
City of Anaheim, CA
222.
Exhibit E -1
Existing Fire and Police Facilities Map
Figure PSF -1
(11 /
/
iii. ,
�. . -
•
' ' .. 5 _ _ i I r . --: 1 : 4 1 ) . i r
141 ilk C. _ g /
I L
4 • AA
1 N 11 % I
T
\ / - '
` 5 d J
y 01fiA1ll( WT' a
ME S
\ qt* i -,.._ ' ,
4 ° a
1 1 Vir : f ,...
, T 1.-- l L —_,' :a . .
Police Districts
• Korth Not Fire Training Center I I South ( I Platinum Triangtc Bounden
L East Cit■ Boundary L, 0
City al Anatioirn
� 'r _ Planning Deparlmam
City of Anah€im, CA °debar A, 2010
24 195
Exhibit E -2
Proposed Fire and Police Facilities Map
Figure PSF -1
li k I r ! ' r
CY11 -.Av.
r
r" Clit 1
a L
I
'
VW. e t i mat - N.,.. '\.....„, ...____ 1 flotaAolry Way i
'-.1
LJ 5I \ L
n a . . ii, , .
...,
- ---.-....." .r .;.
Police Districts
A Platinum Triangle— Three Planned Fire Stations I I South Q Platinum Triangle Bounian
IOne station platued ad)acent to Santa Cruz Street I I Fist Cin lioundarr
as shown on Figure PSF- 1. The mmainiog two
station locations will be noted on Figure PSF -1
following construction.)
• North Net File Training Center 0
r J W ll L� LI Ll IJl�L ll 1J Gh of Anaheim
1 1 ,r Punning naparlmont
City of Anaheim, CA Ocl000r1,2o10
gas