2000/06/20ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA - CITY COUNCIL MEETING
JUNE 20, 2000
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
Present: Mayor Tom Daly, Council Members: Frank Feldhaus, Lucille Kring, Tom Tait
and Shirley McCracken
Staff Present: City Manager Jim Ruth, City Attorney Jack White, City Clerk Sheryll
Schroeder, Assistant City Clerk Cindy Daniel-Garcia
A copy of the agenda for the meeting of the Anaheim City Council was posted on June
16, 2000 at the City Hall inside and outside bulletin boards.
Mayor Daly called the regular meeting to order at 3:15 p.m. in the Council Chambers of
the Anaheim City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION:
Mayor Daly moved to recess to Closed Session.
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSION: None
PUBLIC COMMENTS: None
Council recessed to Closed Session at 3:15 for the following purposes:
1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54956.9(a) - Existing Litigation:
Name of Case: Vista Royale Homeowners Assn. v. 396 Investment Co. fka The
Fieldstone Company, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 77-30-74
(and related cases).
2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION:
Initiation of litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9:
One potential case.
3. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54957.6:
Agency designated representative: David Hill
Name of employee organization: Anaheim Firefighters' Association.
4. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54957.6:
Agency designated representative: David Hill
Name of employee organization: International Brotherhood of Electrical
Workers, Local 47.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 2
5. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54957.6:
Agency designated representative: David Hill
Name of employee organizations: unrepresented management employees.
6. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL ANTICIPATED LITIGATION:
Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956,9 of
the Government Code: five potential cases. Claims of Friends of Frank
Feldhaus Committee, Irving Pickler, Supporters of Irv Pickler Committee, Debra
Daly, Tom Daly and Friends of Tom Daly Committee.
After recess, Mayor Daly called the regular meeting to order at 5:22 P.M.
INVOCATION: Reverend Mary L. Hibbard, Anaheim United Methodist Church
FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Lucille Kring
PRESENTATIONS: Mayor Daly presented a Declaration to Greg Wingert, President of
Anaheim GLass, recognizing Anaheim Glass on their 55th Anniversary.
Mayor Daly presented a Declaration recognizing Releaf Anaheim; Salley White
accepted and explained the work Releaf Anaheim had accomplished. Ms. White
introduced the Members of the Board.
RECOGNITIONS AUTHORIZED BY COUNCIL TO BE PRESENTED AT A LATER
TIME:
A Declaration recognizing Jerry Q'Connell as Chairman of the Ariahelm Chamber of
Commerce for 1999~2000.
Proclamation for June 23 and 24, 2000 as Relay For Life In Anaheim.
At 5:37 P.M., Mayor Daly recessed the Council meeting until after the Redevelopment
Agency and Ariahelm Housing Authority meetings.
Mayor Daly reconvened the Anaheim City Council meeting at 5:49 P.M.
ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA:
City Clerk Schroeder noted there was a request to add two items to the agenda and
Mayor Daly clarified that they were Items B 10 and B 11, from the Planning Commission
meeting of June 19, 2000 and he so moved. Motion seconded by Council Member
Kring and motion carried unanimously.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 3
PUBLIC COMMENTS:
Patty Gabby, 7720 Misty Glenn Coud, Anaheim, said she was representing the Canyon
Hills Soccer Association Board and expressed her opinion that the City should expend
funds on additional spods facilities rather than on golf course improvements.
Linda Lee Grau, 24 Morning Dove, Irvine, announced that Senate candidate Gall
Lightfoot would hold an open house on July 1, 2000. She expressed her disapproval of
the light rail project.
Sarah Aliveson, regarding the Anaheim Hills golf course clubhouse project, said she
supported the new clubhouse proposal and she invited the Council and public to attend
the 4th of July celebration.
Stephanie Perry, 5949 East Avenida Arbo, Anaheim, announced a fundraiser for a
young boy fighting cancer. She also spoke regarding the lack of playing fields in the
City and she said she preferred to see the funding spent on parks rather than golf
course improvements.
Bill Hendley, 240 S. Moller Drive, on behalf of the Canyon Hills Soccer Association and
the National Junior Basketball Association, said even though the golf course brought in
revenues, some of the allocated funds should be spent to purchase land, possibly Maag
Ranch.
Linda Denmar, 8609 East Cliffside Drive, Anaheim, agreed that a banquet facility was
needed at the golf course, but children's' playing fields were not adequate and she
suggested the Council diversify the funds and attempt to improve both.
A resident of 5987 East Avenida Laveta, spoke regarding his desire to see
improvements made at the Anaheim Hills Golf Course, possibly not to the degree
planned. He suggested that the revenue from the golf course and banquet facility could
be earmarked for play areas for children.
Leonard Lahtinen, 2731West Subway Place, Anaheim, informed Council that Faith
Lutheran Church was experiencing flooding problems due to inadequate storm drains
along Orange Avenue and that he had written to the Public Works Department. He said
there was an oppodunity to have cooperation between the County and City to improve
the storm drainage along Orange Avenue. He asked that the City work with the County
to repair the strip between Brookhurst Street and Thistle Street, which would eliminate
the problems on Orange Avenue. He also spoke regarding a recent concert held at the
Anaheim Pond and his distaste for the performers.
Pete Tsachpenis, 156 Calle Dias, Anaheim, spoke regarding his disapproval of the
proposed improvements to the golf course.
With no further public comments, Mayor Daly moved to waive reading in full of all
ordinances and resolutions, seconded by Council Member McCracken and motion was
carried unanimously.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 4
CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENTAL CONSENT CALENDAR A1 TO A31:
Council Member Tait requested discussion on item A21 and A30.
Council Member Feldhaus requested discussion on Item A2. He noted that in reading
the minutes of the Anaheim Public Library Board meeting on March 1, 2000 and reading
the Financial Analysis for the last 10 months ending April 30, 2000, the City's general
fund net revenues were a positive $5 million, $759,000 of which were reimbursement of
ERAF property taxes and he asked if the budget could include a second bookmobile.
City Manager Ruth responded that the facility being utilized in the resort area would be
converted to a bookmobile as soon as construction was complete in the resort area,
within a year.
Mayor Daly said additional information to Council regarding the conversation would be
helpful.
Council Member Tait, speaking on Item A21, a request to spend $447,000 for an
architect to design a new clubhouse at Anaheim Hills Golf Course, construction of which
would cost $6.2 million, said he felt the roof could be repaired and the remaining funds
used to purchase property for parks. He urged Council Members to vote against Item
A21.
Mayor Daly informed that in response to questions raised at the last Council meeting
regarding the proposal, Council asked the City Manager to provide detail on the history
of the existing clubhouse and to provide alternatives. He noted there were three options
for Council to consider: one was a $2 million repair of the existing building, one was a
$3.6 million major remodel and the original proposal of a $6.2 million dollar project.
City Manager Jim Ruth said this process had involved community participation over a
number of years and the conclusion in looking at the existing facility was that the original
club house was not very functional, not conducive to good public golf usage and in
disrepair. He said the community was supportive of replacing the clubhouse and the
City had reviewed options for funding. He added that staff and Council had also looked
at spod facility deficiencies throughout the City and it was found there were cdtical
needs throughout the community, with the greatest need being in the central part of the
City. He said the City would not build a clubhouse at the expense of not providing
sports facilities. Mr. Ruth said the budget before Council this date had three proposals,
one to fund lighting of additional school facilities, bNO was an option to develop the
western end, in cooperation with the County of Orange, of Yorba Regional Park, The
third option, Mr. Ruth said the City was very instrumental in getting the Supervisor to
light Anaheim Hills Elementary School and additional acreage would be graded. He
finalized that the club house recommendation was not made without looking at other
possibilities to address sports needs. He said staff did not think it was a good
investment to rehabilitate the clubhouse, it would be too costly and the long-term
product would not been suitable.
Mayor Daly asked if the clubhouse was rebuilt, could the course handle more golfers.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 5
Jack Kudron, Parks and Golf Superintendent, responded that the current rounds per
year at Anaheim Hills were between 85,000 and 90,000 rounds, the capacity of the
course was about 110,000 rounds. He said the clubhouse and bar were not utilized to
capacity and the City received a lot of feed back from people who had moved their
banquets to other facilities. Upon a question from Mayor Daly regarding the type of
business at the clubhouse, Mr. Kudron said it was patrons for wedding receptions and
golf tournaments.
Upon a question from Council Member Kring regarding the funding for the project, Mr.
Kudron noted that the funds for the project would be from the adjustment of the golf fee
structure done in February, where the non-resident paid more than the resident and that
money would produce about $500,000 and $600,000 a year in addition to sell revenue
bonds to borrow the $6 million which would be paid off over a 15 to 20 year period at
$500,000 or $600,000 per year.
Council Member Tait said staff's figures show the City would earn $100,000 a year
additional funds if the club house is built, he said it would make better business sense to
put the $6.2 million in the bank and earn $400,000 a year. He said from a business
point of view, it did not make good business sense nor from a community needs point of
view.
Mayor Daly reminded everyone that current or future golf revenues could be used for
other projects and there was a balance of needs in the community and a cost benefit
analysis should be applied to this type of project. He said that $6 million sounded ~a
little rich" and he felt the existing clubhouse needed substantial improvements but at
some point, the more expensive the project costs, there were diminishing returns. He
said he did want to find funds to improve the clubhouse but $6 million was a too much
for a replacement project that would not substantially change the operation of the
course, where other improvements would touch many more lives. He said there was no
hurry and this subject should be discussed thoroughly.
Council Member McCracken, referring to Council Member Tait's comment about an
annual profit of $100,000, she said she thought that was only on food, not on sales tax
from the pro shop, not on increased tournaments.
Jack Kudron said the $100,000 was based on what the City felt they could do on
increased food and beverage based on improving the gross by about $1 million and
getting about 10% of the gross from the food and beverage operator. He said staff had
been very conservative on estimates, they had not figured in sales tax on pro shop
merchandise, increased golf or even the possibility of raising the greens fees after the
clubhouse was in place. He said staff had talked to experts in the field and they
indicated that when the clubhouse was completed there would be tolerance for raising
greens fees possibly another 10%.
Council Member McCracken noted that the consultant did not include what the project
would do to property values around the clubhouse and what it would mean in re-sale
values. Mr. Kudron said the consultant looked at the whole idea of a banquet/reception
facility in the area and said the market was right for that.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CiTY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 6
Council Member Feldhaus noted the cad barn was part of the proposal. Mr. Kudron
said all three proposals had a new cart barn included.
Mayor Daily explained that if the City could save money on the $6 million project, bring it
down to $2 or $3 million, the difference could be spent on ball fields and other things.
Council Member Feldhaus said there was a proposed five year plan to fund them and
Mayor Daly said there was a proposed plan but this project should be weighed against
other community needs.
Council Member Kring asked the Mr. Kudron how much money was placed in the
general fund from the golf courses and he answered all the profits from the golf courses
went to the general fund, which was $1.9 million per year. She asked that if the course
capacity was full and the clubhouse was improved, how much would be placed in the
general fund. Mr. Kudron responded that about every 10,000 additional rounds would
generate about $450,000, before expenses. She said that was another $2.4 million a
year generated by the golf courses that could be used for parks and senior housing or
whatever the City wanted.
Council Member Kring reminded everyone that citizens passed Prop 12 in March, the
State Park Bond Act, where the city would be getting millions of dollars to be used for
parks so she did not see the issue was being an either or situation.
Council Member Tait said that when he has approached the subject of purchasing Maag
Ranch, he had been told there was no funds available and now money had been found.
The question was, was this the best way to spend $6.2 million and he said he felt it was
not.
Referring to the proposed budget adoption on the agenda that date, Mayor Daly
suggested that until the $6.2 million for the project was adopted into the budget, it would
be premature to hire the architect. He wondered if Council approved the $447,000 to
hire the architect, if there was a cancellation clause.
Mr. Kudron said it would probably negate the proposed contract, the architect might
keep his proposal in place for 90 or 100 days, but to assume the same proposal would
be valid three or four years from now was not a good assumption.
Council Member McCracken asked if there was any urgency to act on the issue now,
adding that the City had been working towards this project for over 20 years.
Mr. Kudron answered no, staff had indicated that as soon as the architect was hired, it
would take 27 months to open a new facility. He noted that there were continual
operating problems, such as closing of restrooms and when it reined, parts of the facility
had to be closed down and a lot of maintenance had been deferred because staff didn't
want to put money into a facility that may be torn down. He said the risk was that the
City would continue to run a substandard facility.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 7
Mayor Daly asked Mr. Kudron how the 85% usage compared to five years ago and Mr.
Kudron responded that it had been fairly fiat, the City had experienced between 85,000
and 90,000 rounds for the last six years, prior to that it was lower, he added.
Council Member Tait noted it was interesting that the rounds had increased while not
building a new club house and he moved to deny Item A21 to allow staff time to review
it. He said he felt it was premature to spend a half million dollars on an architect when
the Council did not know which direction they were going to go.
Mayor Daly seconded the motion.
Roll call vote: 2 ayes: Mayor Daly, Council Member Tait. 3 noes: Council Member
McCracken, Council Member Feldhaus, Council Member Kring. Motion failed.
Council Member Kring moved to delay the architect contract, Item A21, until July 11,
2000 meeting, seconded by Mayor Daly. Motion carried unanimously.
Regarding Item A30, Council Member Tait said he read it as a request for the City to
pay the PERS contribution for management staff and a 3% increase. He mentioned that
he felt it was an across the board 10% increase for management staff and he was
uncomfodable with that, adding he would vote against the proposal.
Mayor Daly said the staff report indicated a first year cost of $290,000 and he asked for
an explanation of the cost of the PERS contribution. He noted that the City was over
funded in the PERS retirement fund and he asked for the cost of the 7% over two years.
City Manager, Jim Ruth, explained that the money was PERS accrued interest in the
City's contribution to that fund and if the fund was drawn down to $0, the City would
have to pay back the funds to get 100% funded for benefits. Mayor Daly asked, if the
surplus did not exist, the City was at $0 and the City had to pay for this proposal, what
would the cost be.
Human Resources Director, David Hill, responded that if the City paid from City
resources rather than from surplus assets, the first year cost would be approximately $1
million.
Council Member Tait asked, since it was a two-year proposal, what the cost would be.
Mr. Hill answered that when the proposal was fully implemented in year two, it would be
$2 million a year. He said there had been an actuary review the impact on the surplus
assets and it would deplete the surplus assets after about 30 years of payment.
Mayor Daly asked if there were other potential depletions of surplus assets that could
Occur,
Mr. Hill responded none to be recommended by staff at this time, there was 2 pieces of
pending legislation to further improve the benefits for miscellaneous employees, if they
were made optional benefits for local government, the City would have the employee
organizations seeking to use some or all of these surplus assets at a future date to
'spunj S~l=lc] eq] uJ]eloeJ o] poJJe pez!ueejo jo edX] Xue set~ ejeql j! pease XleO
· s~ssse snldjns S~lqd
· Gojoj~jo~ eql e:leA!$otu pue u!el9j '$!njo9j o] ],sejelu! s,,~|!0
a4$ u! se~ ;! paAa!laq :Beis 'p!es a4 'ajm, nj alqeaasaJoJ a41 Jo4 'os op o] LUa4] pa.qnbaJ
sa.~nssajd a^!l!$adwoo s,.4T!:::) a4l pue lUaLUaAOLU p.~eN, dn ue u! se~ alo/~::, ssau!snq a4~, se
8uoI se 'Jea/~ qoea saseajsu! aJnl::)nJls 41!AA sanu!luoo ~!3 a41 leql Se~A uo!lepuaLuLuooaj
aqT p!es II!H 'JIAI 'aTeLu!lsa ue aq plnO~A UO!II!LU E;'~$ lnoqe pajaAAsue II!H 'JIAi
pue SJea/~ lessU oA~l uj aq plno~ lesodoJd aJ!lua aql Jo 1sos aql leq~A pa~se/~le(] JoXelAI
'$a~ljeLu Joqel aql jo SUAAOp pue sdn
aql 6u!loalJaJ suo!iepuaLuLuooaj ql!~A IpunoO ol uJnlaJ S/~eAAle plno~ ~els p!es II!H 'JIAi
· JaDuol/(ue l!Jauaq e aq lou plnO~A 1! aJa4~A ~oeq palsnipe
aq 1! plnoo 'saa,(oldLua ~o ~o!d aql peq 'sja/~oldLua se ',~!::) aq~, aJaq~A uo!]enl!s $uajajJ!p
e uj se~ ,~1!0 aql pue punoje pgujn1Ta~JeLu qo! aql ~! pa~se 6u!J)t JaqLualAJ
'pau!eldxe aq 'alq!ssod se
6uoI se saa/~oldLue snoauellaos!Lu JoJ aleJ uo!lnqpluoo oJaz s/~lK:) eql u!elu!eLu ol ueql
Jaqlo slesse snldjns aql ~o asn leuo!l!ppe Xue 6u!puaLuujooaj lou se~ ~els pue 6u!puad
sl!Jeuaq leuo!l!ppe ou GjG~A ejeql GLU!I SJql 1V 's~,Uauaq ee/~olduJa GAOJdLU! JaqlJnJ
9 :~gVd
O00i: 'OZ :gNnr
S:I,I. RNII/~ 'II3NR03 ALl::) - I/~FIHVNV 40 LLI3
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 9
CAL PERS to stabilize rates and to have them forecasted and predicted over the long
term. Mr. Hill explained that if the surplus condition continued, it would be in everyone's
interest to seek a legislative remedy to return some of the surplus assets, at least those
that could be returned without effecting the stabilized rates. He said he was not aware
of anyone having that on their legislative agenda and Council could adopt that as part of
their legislative package if they believed it was in their long-term interest.
Council Member Tait explained he was not against giving management personnel raises
but he felt it should be done on individual basis, if someone was underpaid, they should
be paid fairly, he said. He was against this proposal because he believed it to be a 10%
across the board increase. He said he preferred individuals being treated as individuals
and those that were performing well be paid accordingly.
Council Member Tait moved to deny Item A30, seconded for purposes of discussion by
Mayor Daly.
Council Member Kring asked for clarification of the proposal, as she understood it
31/2% this year for PERS, 31/2% next year, which was 7% and the next 3% was not
automatic, it would bring employees up to where they should be.
Mr. Hill said that was the way he would describe it, the City did not fund their structure
increases, a change in the structure was adopted, which meant the upper end moved
3%, then each employee was treated as an individual and on their anniversary date,
they were evaluated based upon their performance and they may be eligible for a merit
increase or they may not, adding there was nothing automatic in the management pay
system. Mr. Hill said staff could periodically report ratings to Council and Council
Member Kring noted that would be helpful to get that information periodically.
Mayor Daly expressed his concern that until the budget was adopted, it may not be
prudent to adopt Item A30 and commit the funds and for that reason and his ongoing
concern with the $110 million surplus, he was troubled that staff was not recommending
a more aggressive approach to returning some of the funds to the City. He felt it was
being treated as a future benefits fund and he felt the Council should be given choices.
He said he felt there should be a discussion scheduled in the near future and what the
Council wished their legislative strategy to be.
Mr. Ruth said staff would be happy to pursue that but at the present time there was no
recourse to have the funds returned to the cities.
Council Member McCracken noted that the $1 '10 million was money raised by the
investment policies of PERS and the City's annual contribution was based on how many
employees were retiring and still in the retirement system and at the present time, the
City had not had to add any contribution for employees because of the growth in that
fund because of investments.
Mayor Daly asked the connection of the resolutions to the adoption of the City's budget
and City Manager Ruth responded that they were not linked to the adoption of the
budget, there were sufficient funds in the proposed budget to absorb the $290,000.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 10
Mayor Daly expressed his thoughts that it was premature to adopt the Resolutions until
the Council had adopted the budget, otherwise the Council put themselves in the
position of having no choice but to adopt the budget or find money in the budget if
priorities changed.
Council Member Kring moved to postpone consideration of Item A30 until after adoption
of the budget, seconded by Council Member McCracken. Motion carried by a vote of
four ayes: Mayor Daly, Council Member McCracken, Council Member Feldhaus, Council
Member Kring. One no vote, Council Member Tait.
On a motion by Mayor Daly, seconded by Council Member McCracken, the following
items were approved in accordance with the reports, certifications and
recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent
Calendar, except Items A21 and A30. Mayor Daly offered Resolutions 2000R-107, 108,
109, 110, 111 and 112 for adoption. Motion carried unanimously.
A1.
A2.
A3.
A4.
A5.
A6.
A7.
Reject certain claims filed against the City and claims continued from the
meeting of June 13, 2000, Item A1.
Receive and file minutes of the Anaheim Public Library Board meeting held
March 1, 2000; the Monthly Financial Analysis for ten months ended April 30,
2000, as presented by the Finance Director; and the Investment Portfolio Report
for the month of May, 2000, as submitted by the City Treasurer.
Award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Pro Tech Engineering
Corporation, in the amount of $20,622 for Oak Canyon Nature Center security
lighting and approve and authorize the Finance Director to sign the Escrow
Agreement pertaining to contract retentions.
Award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, R & M Electrical
Contracting, in the amount of $24,925 for Barton Park security and lighting and
approve and authorize the Finance Director to sign the Escrow Agreement
pertaining to contract retentions.
Award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, National Electrical
Contractors, Inc., in the amount of $28,000 for Eucalyptus Park security lighting
and approve and authorize the Finance Director to sign the Escrow Agreement
pertaining to contract retentions.
Award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, R & M Electrical
Contracting, in the amount of $31,681 for Peter Marshall Park security lighting
and approve and authorize the Finance Director to sign the Escrow Agreement
pertaining to contract retentions.
Award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Pro Tech Engineering
Corporation, in the amount of $72,293 for Peralta Park security lighting and
approve and authorize the Finance Director to sign the Escrow Agreement
pertaining to contract retentions.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 11
AS.
A9.
A10.
All.
A12.
A13.
A14.
A15.
A16.
Award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Inspection Engineering, in
the amount of $113,496 for Lincoln Avenue signal coordination and approve and
authorize the Finance Director to sign the Escrow Agreement pertaining to
contract retentions.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-107 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM declaring its intention to vacate certain public streets,
highways and service easements, and setting a date and time to consider
abandoning pipeline, slope, road and public utility easements located at 421
South Country Hills Road. (Abandonment No. 99-4A). (Suggested public
hearing date: August 8, 2000, at 6:00 P.M.)
RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-108 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM supporting the application of the California-Nevada
Super Speed Train Commission to the U. S. Department of Transportation and
Federal Railroad Administration for awards of preconstruction
design/engineering and construction grants under the TEA-21 Magnetic
Levitation Transportation Technology Deployment Program ("MAGLEV
Deployment Program).
Approve the First Amendment to Agreement with Robert Borders and Associates
in an amount not to exceed $19,280 for the tenant improvement for the East
Police Substation.
Approve a Second Amendment to Agreement between Computer Services
Company and the City of Anaheim, extending the term of the traffic signal
maintenance services agreement for one additional year.
Accept the low bid of Grainger Industrial Supply, a division of W.W. Grainger,
Inc., in the amount of $20,341.44 for trash receptacles with tops for the
Convention Center in accordance with Bid #6050.
Accept the low bid of Systems Source, Inc., in the amount of $58,002.62 for
Cadwright furniture for Convention Center new lobby in accordance with Bid
#6043.
Accept the bid of Deery American Corporation, in an amount not to exceed
$67,375 for an estimated 350,000 pounds of C.M.C. 200 asphalt sealant, and
accept the bid of Koch Material Company, in an amount not to exceed $36,795
for an estimated 165 tons of SS-1H sealant, including an estimated 100 hours of
spreading charges for a period of one-year commencing July 1, 2000, and
authorize the Purchasing Agent to exercise up to four additional one-year
renewals, limited to the Consumer Price Index increases, in accordance with Bid
~6031.
Accept the low bid of JM Fiber Optics, Inc., in the amount of $160,023 for fiber
optics equipment, supplies, labor and installation in accordance with Bid #6029.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 12
A17.
Accept the low bid of Plant Control, in an amount not to exceed $28,000, for
weed abatement for a period of one year, commencing
July 1, 2000, and authorize the Purchasing Agent to exercise up to four
additional one-year renewals, adjusted to Consumer Price Index increases, in
accordance with Bid ¢/6032.
A18.
Accept the low bid of All Seasons Tire Centers, Inc., in an amount not to exceed
$55,971, for Police Goodyear vehicle tires as required, for a period of one-year,
commencing July 1, 2000, and authorize the Purchasing Agent to exercise up to
four additional one-year renewals, adjusted according to Consumer Price Index
increases, in accordance with Bid -Y,6042.
A19.
Waive Council Policy No. 306 and authorize the Purchasing Agent to issue a
purchase order to Sico North America, Inc., in the amount of $211,418.02, and
shipping charges, for two portable stages and accessories at the Convention
Center.
A20.
Waive Council Policy No. 306 and authorize the Purchasing Agent to issue a
purchase order in the amount of $31,028 for the purchase of one Pitney Bowes
Series 5 folding inserting system for the Reprographics and Mail Program.
A21.
Increase the revenue and expenditure appropriations in accounts 550-213-4773-
5797 and 550-213-4778-7825 and approve an Agreement with Melzer Deckert
and Ruder, Architects, inc., in an amount not to exceed $447,000 for consultant
services to prepare construction drawings and provide construction observation
for the Anaheim Hills Golf Course Clubhouse project. (Continued from the
meeting of June 13, 2000, Item A12.)
A22.
Approve a License Agreement with Feedback Foundation, Inc. to utilize the
Brookhurst Community Center on a shared basis to provide a comprehensive
meal program for senior citizens, including recreational activities and social
services, through June 30, 2001.
A23.
Approve Amendment No. 3 to Agreement No. C-8-0184 with the Orange County
Transportation Authority in an amount not to exceed $31,870 to provide 3,251
hours of transportation services to senior citizens participating in the Project TLC
lunch programs, from July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2001.
A24.
Authorize the transfer of $271,510 of Community Development Block Grant
Funds to the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency to implement the Anaheim
Colony Historic District Boundary Monument Project.
A25.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-109 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving the Workforce Investment Act Title I Master
Subgrant Agreement between the City of Anaheim and the State of California for
the term of May 1, 2000 through June 30, 2002.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 13
A26.
Consider the appointment of Carol Weirbeky to the Anaheim Workforce
Investment Board representing the Department of Rehabilitation in the One-Stop
Padner Category for a 5-year term.
A27.
Authorize the Fire Chief to apply for Hazardous Materials Emergency
Preparedness Planning Grant, in order to purchase hardware and software to
enhance the Fire Department's effectiveness when handling hazardous material
incidents.
A28.
Approve the Plumbing Utility Agreement between the City and Dow Plumbing
which authorizes Dow Plumbing to provide various plumbing services on a non-
exclusive basis to persons at the Convention Center who require such services
in connection with events.
A29.
Adopt a Negative Declaration for the proposed construction of an electricel
substation in the Anaheim Hills area, to be located at 8155 East Santa Ana
Canyon Road,
A30. Please see minutes after budget adoption.
A31.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-122 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM calling and giving notice of the holding of a general
municipal election to be held on Tuesday, November 7, 2000, for the election of
certain officers as required by provisions of Adicle XIII, Section 1300 of the City
Charier.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-123 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Orange to consolidate a General Municipal Election to be held on November 7,
2000, with the Statewide General Election to be held on that date pursuant to
Section 10403 of the Elections Code.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-124 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting regulations for candidates for elective office
pertaining to candidate statements submitted to the voters at an election to be
held on Tuesday, November 7, 2000.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Regarding Item A32, Continued Public Hearings regarding fees, Mayor Daly suggested
Council return to the item after the land use hearings and there were no objections
heard.
Regarding Item A33, Board and Commission re-appointments, Mayor Daly suggested a
continuance to the July 11, 2000 meeting, the appointment to the Budget Advisory,
which was now vacant and also the Jones seat on the Senior Citizen Commission. He
noted Council could consider the remaining re-appointments.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 14
Council Member Kring stated she wished to see all the Board and Commission openings
advedised.
Mayor Daly asked if there was any objection to that and clarified that everyone currently
holding positions would continue to serve. Hearing no objections, he moved to continue
Item A33 to July 11, 2000, seconded by Council Member Kring and motion carried
unanimously.
Items B1 Zoning Administrator Meeting of June 1, 2000: (No action necessary
unless Council desires to set a particular item for public hearing) APPEAL PERIOD
ENDS JUNE 23, 2000:
B1.
VARIANCE NO. 2000-04396
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT - CLASS 1:
OWNER: David A. Brown and Diane G. Brown, 504 South State College BIvd.,
Anaheim, CA 92806
LOCATION: 504 South State Colleqe BIvd. (Anaheim Band Instruments).
Property is 0.32 acres located at the southeast corner of State College Blvd. and
Westport Drive with a frontage of 112 feet on the east side of State College Blvd.
and a frontage of 79 feet on the south side of Westport Drive.
Waiver of minimum number of parking spaces (34 spaces required; 26 spaces
proposed) to construct a two-story addition to an existing commercial retail
building in the CL (Commercial, Limited) Zone.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR:
Approved Variance No. 2000-04396.
Items B2 throu.qh B8 From Planning Commission Meeting of June 5, 2000: (No
action necessary unless Council desires to set a particular item for public hearing)
APPEAL PERIOD ENDS JUNE 27, 2000:
B2. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-04222
ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 189:
OWNER: City of Anaheim (Redevelopment Agency), 201 South Anaheim
Boulevard, Suite 1003, Ariahelm, CA 92805
AGENT: Avalon Acquisition Corporation, Attn: Mr. Adam Cole, 495 North
Commons Drive, Suite 200, Aurora, Illinois 69504
LOCATION: 400 West Lincoln Avenue and 100 South Harbor Boulevard.
Property is 3.0 acres located at the southeast corner of Lincoln Avenue and
Harbor Boulevard.
To construct a live performance theater including banquet facilities with outdoor
dining area and the sales of alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption and
construction of a freestanding electronic readerboard (changeable message) sign
with waiver of (a) minimum number of parking spaces, (b) maximum height, width,
area and location of freestanding readerboard sign.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
CUP NO. 2000-04222 GRANTED (PC2000-72) (6 yes votes, Commissioner
Bostwick absent).
Approved waiver of code requirement.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 15
EIR NO. 189 previously approved.
Request by Community Development Department to set for public hearing July 11,
2000. Mayor Daly moved to set for public hearing, seconded by Council Member
McCracken.
B3.
WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4171
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 323
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL REVIEW:
OWNER: California Drive-In Theaters, Attn: John Manavian, 120 Nodh
Robertson Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048
LOCATION: 1500 North Lemon Street. Property is 26.34 acres located at the
southeast corner of Lemon Street and Durst Street.
General Plan Amendment No. 370 - An amendment to the Land Use Element
of the General Plan to redesignate the subject properly from the General
Industrial designation to the General Commercial designation.
Reclassification No. 99-00-10 - To reclassify subject property from the ML
(Limited Industrial) Zone to the CL (Commercial, Limited) Zone.
Conditional Use Permit No. 4171 - To construct a 294,632 square foot
commercial retail center including a home improvement store, health club, three
(3) drive-through fast food restaurants, two (2) full-service restaurants, a multi-
tenant pad building, and a freeway-oriented sign with waiver of (a) minimum
number of parking spaces, (b) minimum parking lot landscaping, and (c) required
dedication and improvement of right-of-way.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Recommended adoption of Exhibit A for GPA No. 370 to City Council
(PC 2000-73) (6 yes votes, Commissioner Bostwick absent).
Granted Reclassification No. 99-00-10 (PC2000-74) (6 yes votes, Commissioner
Bostwick absent).
CUP NO. 4171 GRANTED (PC2000-75) (4 yes votes, Commissioners Koos and
Vanderbilt voted no, and Commissioner Bostwick absent).
Waiver of code requirement approved in part, approving waiver (a) and
denying waivers (b) and (c) (4 yes votes, Commissioners Koos and Vanderbilt
voted no, Commissioner Bostwick absent).
Recommended certification to the City Council of EIR 323.
Recommended by staff to be set for public hearing August 8, 2000.
B4.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-04225
(MASTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4075)
AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
OWNER: Raymond Runo Trust, Attn: Norma Hillman, Dan Neyenhuis, and
Lillian Runo, 1120 Kenwood Place, Fullerton, CA 92531
AGENT: Fairmont Private Schools, Inc., Attn: David R. Jackson, 100 South
Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 125, Anaheim, CA 92805
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 16
LOCATION: 1575 West Mable Street. Property is 0.89 acre located on the
north side of Mable Street, 270 feet east of the centerline of Loara Street
(Fairmont Private School).
To amend previously-approved floor plans to eliminate classrooms and reduce
the warehouse area.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Approved amendment to floor plans of Master CUP NO. 4075 to expire March 1,
2019 (PC2000-76) (6 yes votes, Commissioner Bostwick absent).
Negative Declaration previously approved.
B5.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-04213
(MASTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3528)
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT-CLASS 3:
OWNER: Canyon United Methodist Church, Attn: Tom Rothaar, 101 Chaparral
Court, Anaheim, CA 92808
AGENT: Greg Hammill, 414 Fernhill Lane, Anaheim, CA 92807
LOCATION: 101 South Chal~arral Court. Property is 1.3 acres located at the
southwest corner of Kaiser Boulevard and Chaparral (Light of the Canyon United
Methodist Church).
To consider reinstatement of Master Conditional Use Permit No. 3528 which
currently contains a time limitation (originally approved on July 27, 1992, to
expire on October 9, 1999) to retain 4 modular structures used for a temporary
church sanctuary, offices, classrooms, a library and kitchen facilities.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Approved reinstatement of Master CUP NO. 3528 for two years, to expire
December 9, 2001 (PC2000-77) (6 yes votes, Commissioner Bostwick absent).
B6.
WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-04214
(MASTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3647)
AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
OWNER: Omar L. and Grace C. Blanchard, Trustees, Attn: Rex Blanchard, 191
Old Springs Road, Anaheim, CA 92808
AGENT: Associate Building Inc., Attn: Don Gilmartin, 425 East Arrow Highway,
#235, Glendora, CA 91740
LOCATION: 191 South Old Sprinqs Road. Property is 1.42 acres located at the
northwest corner of Monte Vista Road and Old Springs Road (Hillsborough
School).
To permit an expansion to an existing child day care facility and private
elementary school with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces (deleted).
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Master CUP NO. 3647 APPROVED IN PART (PC2000-78) (6 yes votes,
Commissioner Bostwick absent).
Denied waiver of code requirement.
Approved Negative Declaration.
B7.
WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-04215
(MASTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3293)
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 17
CEQA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION-CLASS 1:
OWNER: Vicorp Restaurants, Inc., Attn: Rick Foerster, 400 West 48th Avenue,
Denver, CO 80216
LOCATION: 2110 South Harbor Boulevard. Property is 0.92 acre located on
the east side of Harbor Boulevard, 200 feet south of the centerline of
Orangewood Avenue (Baker's Square Restaurant).
To construct an outdoor dining area in conjunction with an existing sit-down
restaurant with sales of beer and wine for on-premises consumption with waiver
of minimum number of parking spaces.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Approved modification to Master CUP NO. 3293 (PC2000-79) (6 yes votes,
Commissioner Bostwick absent).
Approved waiver of code requirement.
B8.
WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2000-04217 CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
OWNER: Michael and Lucy Kurkjian, 2331 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, CA
92806
AGENT: Western States Engineering, Attn: Carmen Begay, 1150 North
Richfield Road, Anaheim, CA 92807
LOCATION: 3085 East La Palma Avenue. Property is 0.52 acre located at the
northwest corner of La Palma Avenue and Kramer Boulevard.
To construct a gasoline service station with accessory convenience market, and
a fast food restaurant with waivers of (a) permitted encroachments into required
yards, (b) minimum dimensions of parking spaces (deleted), (c) minimum
landscaped setback adjacent to arterial highways, (d) minimum structural
setback adjacent to interior property lines, and (e) minimum landscape
requirements adjacent to interior property lines.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
CUP NO. 2000-04217 GRANTED IN PART (PC2000-80) (6 yes votes,
Commissioner Bostwick absent).
Waiver of code requirement approved, in part.
Negative Declaration previously approved.
No further action was taken on B Items.
B9.
(c)
REQUEST FOR REHEARING
VARIANCE NO. 4390 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
OWNER: Chibueze J. Dallah, 17380 Briardale Lane, Yorba Linda, CA 92886
LOCATION: 1429 East Lincoln Avenue. Property is 0.46 acres located on the
north side of Lincoln Avenue, 160 feet east of the centerline of La Plaza.
Waiver of (a) minimum side yard setback, (b) minimum front yard setback and
required orientation of residence adjacent to aderial highway, to construct a
single-family residence.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Variance No. 4390 GRANTED IN PART (PC2000-39) (6 yes votes, Chairperson
Boydstun absent).
Approved Negative Declaration.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 18
Informational item at the meeting of April 18, 2000. Review of the Planning
Commission's decision requested by Mayor Daly and Mayor Pro Tem
McCracken.
Public hearing continued from the meeting of May 16, 2000, Item C3.
Variance denied by Council (Resolution No. 2000R-18) May 23, 2000 (Item C2).
Negative Declaration denied.
Re-hearing filed by Owner June 8, 2000.
Mayor Daly asked if there was any new information regarding the request for rehearing
and City Attorney While responded no, in his opinion there was no necessity to grant a
re-hearing, it would be discretionary with Council.
Mayor Daly said that unless the plans had changed, which it appeared that they had not,
he felt they should deny the re-hearing.
Council Member Feldhaus remembered that the owner was supposed to meet with staff
and attempt to find a usage.
Planning Director, Joel Fick, answered that there had been discussions with the
applicant and he was evaluating his options.
Council Member Feldhaus felt that was a premature action and Mr. Fick said the request
was on the current development proposal that he previously proposed and submitted to
Council.
Mayor Daly moved to deny the request for re-hearing on Variance 4390, seconded by
Council Member Feldhaus and carried unanimously.
ADDENDUM TO THE AGENDA:
Items B10 and B11 From Planning Commission Meeting of June 19, 2000: (No
action necessary unless Council desires to set a padicular item for public hearing)
APPEAL PERIOD ENDS JUNE 29, 2000:
B10. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2000-00159 CEQA CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT-CLASS 15:
OWNER: R.S. Hoyt, Jr., Trustee of R.S. Hoyt Jr., Family Trust, 146 East
Orangethorpe Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92803
AGENT: Anacal Engineering, 1900 East La Palma Avenue, #202, Anaheim, CA
92805
LOCATION: 1537-1567 West Embassy Street. Property is 2.2 acres located at
the northeast corner of Loara Street and Embassy Street.
TO establish a 4-lot industrial subdivision.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Approved Tentative Parcel Map No. 2000-00159 (6 yes votes, Commissioner
Arnold absent).
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 19
Bll.
FINAL SITE PLAN NO. 00-06
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT, CLASS 3 AND 11 - REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND
APPROVAL OF A FINAL SITE PLAN TO INSTALL SIX
FREESTANDING DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, ONE PARKING LOT TOLL
BOOTH AND TWO TICKET DISPENSERS: Pacific Islandia California, Inc.,
1015 West Ball Road, Anaheim, CA 92802, requests review and approval of
a Final Site Plan, including a site plan, elevation plans and sign plans, to install
six (6) freestanding directional signs, one (1) parking lot toll booth and two
(2) ticket dispensers in the Anaheim Sheraton parking lot. The property is
located at 1015 West Ball Road (Anaheim Sheraton).
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Approved Final Site Plan 00-06, Exhibits Nos. I through 14, and is in
conformance with the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (6 yes votes,
Commissioner Arnold absent).
END OF THE 10-DAY APPEAL PERIOD ITEMS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION
MEETING OF JUNE 19, 2000.
No request for public hearing was heard.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
C1. PUBLIC HEARING - ANAHEIM RESORT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT:
At their meeting of June 6, 2000, Item A16, the Anaheim City Council adopted two
resolutions. (1) Resolution No. 2000R-90 declaring its intention to provide for an annual
levy and collection of assessments in the Anaheim Resort Maintenance District for
Fiscal Year 2000/01, and (2) Resolution No. 2000R-91 initiating proceedings for the
annual levy of assessments in, and accepting an assessment Engineer's report for,
Anaheim Resort Maintenance District.
Resolution No. 2000R-90 was published in the North County news June 9, 2000.
Assistant City Manager, Tom Wood, presented the staff report, which is a part of this
record.
Mayor Daly opened the public hearing for comments.
Robert Gain, 2515 Barrel, said Melody Land Christian Center was within the district and
he contended that it was not a business and should not be subject to the fees. He said
he was not sure they were notified properly a year ago when the district was formed. He
added that access to the properly had been cut off. He said the benefit was to the
hotels, not a church.
The Associate Pastor of Melody Land Christian Center, concurred.
Hearing no further testimony, Mayor Daly closed the public hearing.
Council Member Feldhaus expressed his feelings regarding the way the letter from
Willdan and Associates was worded, he felt it was too caustic. He felt a business that
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 20
was taken into the resort area by defined lines picked out by the City and was on the
peripheral was not fair to the business.
Council Member Kring agreed with Council Member Feldhaus and added that so many
of the businesses had been impacted with the construction and loss of business. She
asked if it was too late to go back and look at certain circumstances and what type of
penalty was imposed if someone did not pay the fees.
Assistant City Manager Wood said Dick Kopecky of Willdan's would add to his
response. Regarding the question if the bills had been sent out, Mr. Wood said yes, this
was an annual process, this was the second year of the assessment. He said it went
out with the property taxes.
Council Member Kring asked if the City had received any complaints since they had
mailed out bills for two years and Mr. Wood said the only complaint his office had
received was from the son of the liquor store owner that Council Member Feldhaus
spoke to and since the public hearing and vote held a year ago, that was the only
response heard from.
Council Member Kring asked if everyone had paid the bills. Mr. Wood said the City had
a very good compliance with paying.
Answering Council Member Kring's second question, Mr. Wood said the way the system
was set up, when a property turns into productive use, he used the strawberry field as
an example, the assessment was fixed and spread over the properties that were in
business. In future years as additional properties come on line, everyone's assessment
would drop. In future years, the City believed there would be a rather substantial
readjustment in the rates being paid. Regarding the third question, Mr. Wood
responded that City had made every attempt to work with the industry to minimize the
impact on property owners. He added that the assessment district was initially
contemplated to go into place when the first landscaping was installed. Harbor Blvd.
landscaping was installed on the segment south of Katella about three years ago and
the City purposely choose to pay for the maintenance of that segment, Walnut and the
early portions of Katella, out of construction funds. Mr. Wood said the City felt that was
the fair and appropriate way to minimize the effect on all property owners. He reminded
that last year there had been the vote, public meetings and discussions. Regarding
technical questions, Mr. Wood said the engineer on record from Willdan and Associates
would be able to respond to.
Dick Kopecky, Willdan and Associates, explained that prior to Proposition 218 there was
the ability to exempt certain properties but since the passage, all properties that
benefited, that received a special benefit, must be assessed. He said that the intent of
the letter referred to was that that could not be a consideration, even if Willdan and the
Council wished to consider it, the engineers could not do it, they must assess all
properties based on the special benefit that they received. He added the benefit should
be uniformly applied throughout the district and in this particular case, there were vacant
properties and they would not benefit and would not be assessed until the properties
were actually built upon. He reported that there were also provisions in the district
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 21
report that if businesses were subject to construction in front of their properties for 120
days, they could approach the City and request their assessment to be reduced.
Mayor Daly moved to adopt Resolution No. 2000R-113.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-113 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND PROVIDING
FOR THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT IN AND FOR THE ANAHEIM
RESORT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
Roll call vote: 5 ayes: Mayor Daly, Council Member McCracken, Council Member Tait,
Council Member Kring, Council Member Feldhaus. Noes: none. Motion carried
unanimously.
C2.
PUBLIC HEARING -
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2000-00376
CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2000-00002
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2000-00023
AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL REVIEW:
REQUESTED BY: City of Anaheim (Redevelopment Agency), 201 South
Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 1003, Anaheim, CA 92805
LOCATION: Subject area consists of approximately 430 acres located along,
and surrounding, Anaheim Boulevard between Broadway to the north and the
Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway to the south.
General Plan Amendment No. 2000-00376 - A proposed amendment to the
Land Use Element of the General Plan to: a) redesignate properties from the
General Industrial, General Commercial, Medium Density Residential and Low
Density Residential designations to the Low-Medium Density Residential
designation; b) redesignate properties from the General Industrial, Business
Office/Mixed Use/Industrial, Commercial Professional, Medium Density
Residential and Low-Medium Density Residential designations to the General
Commercial designation; c) redesignate properties from the General
Commercial, Medium Density Residential, and Low Density Residential
designations to the Commercial Professional designation; and, d) redesignate
properties from the General Commercial and Medium Density Residential
designations to the Special Park Site designation.
Code Amendment No. 2000-00002 - To amend Title 18 by establishing the
South Anaheim Boulevard Commercial Corridor (SABC) Overlay Zone which
would serve to: a) permit new land uses in the Overlay Zone area in addition to
those allowed under existing zoning; b) establish a design review process for
future development projects within the Overlay Zone area; c) adopt, by
reference, a Master Plan for public and private landscaped areas; d) restrict
establishment of additional locations for off-premises sales of alcoholic
beverages, and; e) adopt a sign amortization program which would require the
removal of freestanding signs not in conformance with the sign regulations
contained within the Anaheim Municipal Code after a 15-year amortization
period.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 22
Reclassi~cation No. 2000-00023 - To reclassify subject area by combining the
South Anaheim Boulevard Commercial Corridor (SABC) Overlay Zone with each
parcel's existing underlying zoning designation while removing certain properties
located north of Katella Avenue, east of the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway, south of
the Southern California Edison Easement and west of the Southern Pacific
Railroad right-of-way from the Sports Entertainment (SE) Overlay Zone.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Recommended adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 2000-00376, Exhibit
A, to City Council (PC2000-60) (5 yes votes, Commissioners Bostwick and
Boydstun abstained).
Recommended adoption of Code Amendment No. 2000-00002 to City Council.
Reclassification No. 2000-00023 Granted (PC2000-61).
Approved Mitigated Negative Declaration.
Informational item at the City Council meeting of June 13, 2000, Item B3. Set for
public hearing on June 20, 2000, due to General Plan Amendment No. 2000-
00376.
City Clerk Schroeder explained there had been a request by staff to continue the public
hearing and re-notice for Anaheim City Council meeting of August 8, 2000.
Mayor Daly moved to continue the public hearing for General Plan Amendment No.
2000-00376, Code Amendment No. 2000-00002, Reclassification No. 2000-00023 and
Mitigated Negative Declaration, seconded by Council Member McCracken. Motion
carried unanimously.
C3.
PUBLIC HEARING - WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4187
AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
OWNER: Islamic Institute of Orange County, 1220 North State College
Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92806
AGENT: Dr. Gamal E. Nour, 1221 Nodh Placentia Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92806
LOCATION: 1220-1230 North State Colleqe Boulevard. Property is 1.93 acres
located north and east of the northeast corner of Placentia Avenue and State
College Boulevard (islamic Institute of Orange County).
To permit and construct a church with an accessory private elementary school
with waiver of (a) institutional uses adjacent to residential zones, and (b)
minimum number of parking spaces.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
CUP NO. 4187 GRANTED (PC2000-51) (6 yes votes, Commissioner Boydstun
absent).
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in North County News: June 8, 2000
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet: June 8, 2000
Posting of property: June 7, 2000
Mayor Daly noted he had requested this item be set for hearing due to the two waivers
of code requirement and he asked Planning Director Fick to explain how the waivers
would work with the surrounding neighborhood.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 23
Greg Hastings presented a brief staff report, which is a part of these minutes.
Mayor Daly asked if there would be landscaping along or adjacent to the easement and
Mr. Hastings responded that the easement was right at the property line and there was
a substantial amount of landscaping on the interior of the project.
Mayor Daly asked why the Council was seeing large gaps between what the Code
stated what was needed and what the professional staff concluded. He asked which
two facilities would not be operated at the same time and Mr. Hasting answered the
prayer hall and the small auditorium. Mayor Daly asked how the City would monitor the
use and Mr. Hastings said there was a condition of approval that could be monitored by
complaints filed with Code Enforcement.
Planning Director Fick said the way the Code was structured when counting parking
requirements, it specified a certain number of spaces either per square footage or for
certain types of uses and when there is a use that may have multiple uses, staff got a
cumulative requirement but the Code, being permissive, does have a provision where
traffic or parking studies can be done that justify duel uses of the property.
John Lower, Traffic Manager, added that this paralleled often what staff saw in schools,
where a school has an auditorium and they have a condition that the two buildings not
be used at the same time, so only one building would create a demand for parking.
Mayor Daly asked Mr. Lower if that would be monitored easily and Mr. Lower responded
that the neighbors would be the first to complain and Code Enforcement would follow up
on the complaints.
Council Member Feldhaus asked what buffer would be used between the service
station.
Mr. Hasting informed that he did not recall if there was a separation since the church
was the same zone as the service station, there was not a code requirement that there
be a separation.
Council Member Feldhaus noted that the parking lot backed up to the service station
and Mr. Hasting responded yes, there was a landscape area as well as part of the
building abutting. He said the outdoor play area was fenced and did not abut the
service station. Council Member Feldhaus asked about the southwest corner and Mr.
Hasting said the southwest side would be developed with a parking lot utilized for the
entire building.
Mayor Daly opened the public hearing.
Steven Phillips, architect with FTR, noted the Islamic Institute had operated since 1992
and had tried to be good neighbors and had appointed a group to monitor the parking lot
and make sure there are no traffic concerns. He said they would be adding an
auditorium or community room with a kitchen facility, a school with K through 6 with 95
per- schoolers. He noted that the gas station would have a solid wall off the gas station
from the new facility and the play area would be on the other side of the property, away
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 24
from the gas station. Regarding traffic, there would be an island as a buffer, which had
substantial trees, and two additional aprons would be added to control traffic, he added.
Mayor Daly told Mr. Phillips that the repod stated that landscape plans were in
substantial conformance with the Code and he asked if that meant the plans met the
objectives of the City. Mr. Hasting responded that was correct, staff needed clarification
on some items and that was why it would be coming back as a report and
recommendation to the Planning Commission for a final look and he added that they
would encourage the mature landscaping be left in place.
Gamal Nour, Executive Director of the Islamic Institute of Orange County, said that he
was excited about building the school and serving the community. He asked Council to
affirm the Planning Commission's approval of the waivers.
Hearing no further testimony, Mayor Daly closed the public hearing.
Mayor Daly, regarding the parking waiver requested, asked if some reason the property
changed hands and another church occupied the site, would the same conditions apply.
Mr. Fick responded that that was correct, the conditions run with the land and project.
Council Member McCracken expressed her approval that the plans indicate that the
school had sufficient parking for their largest part of the facility.
Mayor Daly moved to approve the environmental findings, seconded by Council Member
Kring, motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Daly offered Resolution No. 2000R-114 for adoption.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000R~114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4187.
Roll Call vote: 5 ayes: Mayor Daly, Council Member McCracken, Council Member Tait,
Council Member Kring, Council Member Feldhaus. Noes: none. Motion carried
unanimously.
C4.
PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 2000-04207
(MASTER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4069)
AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
OWNER: Khoda B. Ostowari, Parvin Soroushian and Irandokht Djahanian, 6263
East Twin Peak Circle, Anaheim, CA 92807
LOCATION: 805 South Harbor Boulevard (formerly 801 South Harbor Boulevard
and 510 West South Street). Property is 0.8 acres located at the southwest
corner of South Street and Harbor Boulevard.
To amend or delete conditions of approval pertaining to the license for the retail
sale of beer and wine for off-premises consumption for a previously-approved
service station with convenience market and car wash.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 25
Approved amendment to conditions of approval for Master CUP NO. 4069;
approved an extension of time to obtain an ABC license (to expire 9/30/00); and
approved the retail sales of beer and wine for three years from the occupancy of
the convenience market (PC2000-56)
(4 yes votes, Commissioner Napoles voted no, Commissioners Arnold and
Boydstun were absent).
Negative Declaration previously approved.
Informational item at the meeting of May 23, 2000, Item B6. Letter of appeal
submitted by YMCA of Orange County.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in North County News: June 8, 2000
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet: June 8, 2000
Posting of property: June 9, 2000
Mayor Daly clarified that the issue before Council was the approval of the beer and wine
permit.
Greg Hasting, Planning Department, presented the staff repod, which is made a part of
the record.
Mayor Daly opened the public hearing.
Khoda Ostowari, 6263 East Twin Peak Circle, Anaheim, owner, informed that after the
alcoholic beverage control appeal period, new protests against the license was received
by Assemblyman Correa's office. He said the Assemblyman's office contacted
Sacramento to re-open the protest period and two letters of opposition were accepted.
One of the letters was from Ms. Roberta Thompson, Ariahelm School District
Superintendent, and he noted he had met with her and the Principal of the Benjamin
Franklin School. The second letter was from Dr. Don Garcia, owner of Clinical Medical
Center at 896 S. Harbor BIrd. He stated the protestors and Assembly Member's wishes
had been fulfilled and the Alcoholic Beverage Control had set a coud hearing so
everyone could be heard, He said it would take several months and in order to comply
with the CUP, he had to obtain an extension, a six-month extension was granted by the
Planning Commission on May 8, 2000. He said some of the same protestors, including
Dr. Garoia, had appealed the extension. He said he was asking Council to ratify the
extension so that the hearing can be held in front of the judge.
Mr. Ostowari asked what criteria YMCA used to appeal alcoholic beverage licenses and
he asked why Dr. Garcia did not object earlier.
Council Member Kring asked if the extension was approved through September, would
Mr. Ostowari have adequate time to get through the hearing process. He noted that
time period would be sufficient, he was still waiting for ABC to set the hearing. He
added that ABC was waiting to find out Council's action before they set the hearing.
Mayor Daly called for anyone to speak in opposition to the project.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 26
Don Garcia, 896 S. Harbor Blvd., said he had done extensive research with community
members to ascertain what had occurred since December of 1998 when a certificate of
necessity and convenience was approved for the location. He said many families were
unable to attend the meeting to speak about community needs and concerns. He
informed that there were currently 14 alcoholic beverage licenses within the census
track and the crime rate for 1998 for that census track was 159% above the City
average, for 1999, 148% above the City average. He mentioned the schools, churches
and hospitals in the area and he noted his concern about what was approved in 1998.
He suppoded not approving the beer and wine permit for another year or two, allow the
community to heal and allow the neighbors to live with the new mini-mart and new
service needs.
Council Member McCracken noted that Dr. Garcia's name was on the appeal, but the
check paying for the appeal fee came from the YMCA of Orange County and she asked
if he represented the YMCA. Dr. Garcia responded that he was not a representative of
the YMCA. She asked how he could pay for the appeal with their check if he did not
represent them and he answered again that he did not represent YMCA but he was a
part of their coalition in regards to looking at the access of beer and wine and liquor in
the communities of North Orange County.
Audie Contrasus, said he was a community a lead organizer and an alcohol and other
drug prevention specialist agent for all of North Orange County cities and that the YMCA
was the fiscal agent that held their monies and they were funded by the Orange County
Health Care Agency, ADEPT, funded by the state and federal government. He said
their job was to work with cities building coalitions and task forces working with
community members who call with a problem with a liquor store or a gas station that will
sell alcohol in the future. Mayor Daly asked if Mr. Contrasus was an employee of YMCA
of Orange County and he responded that it was called YMCA CIAPN, after June 30th it
would be taken over by Community Services program, a non-profit agency funded to
provide a safe and healthy community. Council Member Tait asked if he was from the
YMCA and Mr. Contrasus said the YMCA was the fiscal agent, they were paid by YMCA
of Orange County but they were funded by the Orange County Health Care Agency,
state and federal. Council Member Tait asked if he was speaking on behalf of YMCA
Orange County and Mr. Contrasus said yes, he was an employee of YMCA, an
employee of the County, state and federal.
Council Member Kring said that it was ultimately taxpayer's money paying for the appeal
and Mr. Contrasus responded affirmatively.
Mr. Contrasus informed that talking with churches, residents, getting information from
Planning Commission, they brought it all together and provided it to the community. He
said he did not bring information, he was just going by what residents brought to him as
their concerns and he asked Council to think about approval of the license.
Council Member Tait asked if it was correct that Mr. Contrasus was not in opposition, he
was just asking Council to think about the decision. Mr. Contrasus said he was just
present as an advisor for the community that brought him there to assist them. He said
he was against alcohol being sold at the gas station.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 27
Jessica Castro, employed by Orange County Head Stad, said Head Start was opening a
facility at Franklin Elementary School, where 102 pre-school children will attend, four
year olds walking on Harbor. She felt there were enough alcohol vendors in the area
and another was not needed.
Amin David, 1585 West Broadway, said Council should look at the land use element and
the owner should put the business in Anaheim Hills, there were no alcohol licenses in
the area. He said he had no objection to the service station going in, just the sale of
beer and wine. He read a letter from Diocese of Orange, Most Reverend Jaime Soto,
which is a part of the record.
Chris Gonzales, 528 N. Royal Street, stated strong opposition to the sale of alcohol.
Francisco Sahand, 1303 W. Lincoln, spoke in opposition to the sale of alcohol and the
increase crime in the area. He asked Council to deny all liquor licenses that come to
Council.
A lady speaking as Administrator of Casa Pacificia Convelsant Hospital, 861 S. Harbor
Blvd., and representing the owner, Richard Feingold. She read a letter from Mr.
Feingold, which is included in the record.
Jim Callison, Chairman of the California Square Neighborhood Association, 601 S.
Clementine, said that the project was the wrong use for the wrong site. He said that
when a Planning Commissioner was asked why he voted in favor of the project he
stated that he voted in favor because no one opposed it and Mr. Callison asked if the
Commissioners had a responsibility to the citizens of Anaheim to look at a project and
site and determine if it was an appropriate use. He asked if it made sense to have a
gas station, car wash, liquor store adjacent to an area of single family residents,
churches and schools and hospitals. He asked if there had been a traffic study to
determine if it would have an impact on the neighborhood. He said he had a problem
with the City's notification process and he asked how a project like this would only
require notification of property owners within 300 feet. He said there was no verification
that the notifications were made. He said if their neighborhood would have had
notification, they would have made it clear that it was the wrong use for this site and he
asked Council to deny liquor being sold from the facility and stop construction of the
project, bail out the property owner of his financial investment and take over the properly
and find an appropriate use for the site and sell it to a responsible developer. He
indicated that the church was interested in the property.
Brian Stoddard, 600 S. Helena Street, said his home was within 1,000 feet of the site
and he worried about loitering, traffic and increased crime and he requested the liquor
license be denied.
No further comments, Mayor Daly called on the property owner to speak.
Khoda Ostowari, owner, said Mr. Garcia only mentioned twice that he was against beer
and wine, the problem was that he did not want the project. After January 25th, he said
the beer and wine application was the issue. He said the license was a limited beer and
wine license. He said the previous liquor store sold pornographic videos and
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 28
magazines, asking why the YMCA did not object then. He said this project was being
attacked due to the liquor sales and other liquor stores in the area were not under
attack. He said the YMCA paid for the appeal of this project. He said he and his wife
were the only people who did something with the property, closing the previous liquor
store. He said he personally sent a letter to Casa Pacificia and they knew of the project.
He said it had been reported that his project was approved before the 1998 election and
he clarified that it was not approved until after the 1998 election.
Council Member Tait asked Mr. Ostowari how much he was investing in the project and
Mr. Ostowari responded that he purchased the property for $525,000, the loan on the
project was $1.46 million, total close to $2 million. Council Member Tait asked if the City
had granted the CUP not allowing the beer and wine, would he have brought the
property and close the liquor store. He answered no. Council Member Tait asked him,
based on the approval he received, he invested $2 million to rebuild the site, take out
the old liquor store and sell beer and wine and he answered, correct.
Parvin Soroushian, owner, said she wished to speak and City Attorney White said that
the Mayor had called for the owner to speak under rebuttal after all the comments and
she did not indicate that she wished to speak at that time.
Mayor Daly closed the public hearing.
Mayor Daly said he had said before, he did not think this was the best land use for the
site and he had opposed the project. He indicated that he met with the owner and told
him he would oppose the project and he continued to oppose the project and the beer
and wine license. He said there were other projects that could have been encouraged
to be built on the site.
Council Member Kring moved to approve the CEQA Finding, Negative Declaration,
seconded by Council Member McCracken. Motion carried by four ayes: Council
Member McCracken, Council Member Tait, Council Member Feldhaus, Council Member
Kring. Noes, one, Mayor Daly.
Council Member Kring moved to approve Resolution No. 2000R-115.
Council Member Tait said he appreciated the public input on the item, however, the
project had been approved two years ago, based on that, this businessman invested
over $2 million in the property, in the community, improved the community based on that
promise from the City. He said now for the City to take back that promise, he felt would
violate the owners rights and take away his investment of $2 million, He said the choice
or alternative was to leave the existing liquor store on the property and it would still be
there today.
Council Member Feldhaus said prior to this project, there was a 76 gas station on that
corner for years and the liquor store was right beside it. He said he did not hear an
outcry from people when the 76 station was there and he stated he was surprised at the
outcry now. He clarified that the decision before Council this date was to decide if they
wished to uphold the Planning Commission's extension of time, this was not approval for
the applicant to apply for a license. He explained the owner still had to apply for the
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 29
liquor license and that was why the Planning Commission allowed to September 30,
2000. Council Member Feldhaus asked the police Department if there were 14 liquor
establishments in that census track and why didn't people complain before.
Randy West, Anaheim Police Department, answered that there were currently 11
existing off sale permits and two of the 11 had been surrendered and would disappear
as of October and there was two on sale licenses in the census track that were
restaurants. Officer West read the list of current open liquor licenses.
Council Member Kring reaffirmed her motion to adopt Resolution No. 2000R-115.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL IN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4069 AND AMENDING
RESOLUTION NO. 98R-266
Roll Call vote: 4 ayes: Council Member McCracken, Council Member Tait, Council
Member Kring, Council Member Feldhaus. Noes: 1, Mayor Daly. Motion carried.
D. REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS:
City Attorney White stated there were no items to report.
At 9:15 P.M., Mayor Daly called for a five minute recess.
All Council Members returned to open session at 9:35 P.M.
At this time, Mayor Daly returned the meeting to Item A32, a continued public hearing on
the Fiscal Year 2000/2001 Budget. He called for any comments regarding the budget
and hearing none, he closed the public hearing.
Mayor Daly noted that some fee and charge resolutions were approved at the previous
meeting, there were some remaining on the agenda, and he called for questions
regarding any of the proposed fees.
Council Member Tait noted that he had requested the fee resolutions be continued due
to his concern that no fee should be increased beyond inflationary adjustments and he
had received a memo from staff indicating that there were none.
Council Member Feldhaus asked if the New Construction Index By The Engineering
News Record was the only guideline for increases in fees.
Finance Director Bill Sweeney answered that it was widely used and had been
incorporated into the City's ordinances as an example. He said he would supply Council
Member Feldhaus if there were other source documents used.
Mayor Daly moved for adoption of Resolution Nos. 2000R-116, 117, 118, 119, 120 and
121, seconded by Council Member Feldhaus.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 30
A32.
A. RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-116 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM establishing the amount of the park in-lieu fee and
rescinding Resolution No. 99R-116. (Continued from the meeting of June 13,
2000, Item A20G).
B. RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-117 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM establishing fees to be charged by the Public
Works Department of the City of Anaheim. (Continued from the meeting of June
13, 2000, Item A201).
C. RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-118 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting new fee schedules for building and
construction. (Continued from the meeting of June 13, 2000, Item A20K#1 ).
RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-119 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting new fee schedules for Planning, Zoning and
land use petitions, permits, approvals, appeals and inspections. (Continued from
the meeting of June 13, 2000, Item A20K#2).
D. RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-120 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM revising fees for services rendered by the Fire
Department and establishing the effective date of fees. (Continued from the
meeting of June 13, 2000, Item A20L).
E. RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-121 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting a new schedule of sanitation charges.
(Continued from the meeting of June 13, 2000, Item A20M).
Roll call vote 5 ayes: Mayor Daly, Council Member McCracken, Council Member Tait,
Council Member Feldhaus, Council Member Kring. Nays: none. Motion carried
unanimously.
PROPOSED BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2000/2001
Mayor Daly noted that the City Manager had submitted some modifications, which
reflected Council's previous questions and recommendations. He referred to the list
submitted by the City Manager.
Mayor Daly asked about the funding level in the proposed budget for the Council
Assistants and Mr. Ruth said the funding level was the same as last year. Mayor Daly
said the program was adopted mid-year for an eight-month period. Mr. Ruth said the
Council policy was $15,000 per Council Member and $75,000 had been budgeted.
Mayor Daly recalled starting the program in October or November and the figure was
$15,000 per Council Member for the remainder of the fiscal year.
Mr. Sweeney said it was his understanding that the allocation would be $75,000 per
year, which would be $15,000 per office.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 31
Assistant City Manager Dave Morgan noted that the Council wanted a program at
$15,000 per Assistant per year and staff chose to fund it for a full year even though it
was implemented at mid year.
Mayor Daly said he recalled the program being $15,000 per Council Member for the
remainder of that fiscal year and he asked why those positions would be stagnate when
every other position was increased.
Mr. Morgan said he thought staff had thought that Council set that as policy direction,
that they wanted it not to exceed that number but Council could revisit their policy.
Council Member Kring stated she remembered the figure being at $15,000, which kept
the hours under 1,000.
City Manager Ruth said he would add the consideration of this item to the budget
discussions in August and provide copies of the Resolution, which contained the Council
policy.
Mayor Daly noted the Council section was blank and he asked where the dollar number
was in the budget for Council Assistants and Mr. Sweeney said there was a line item in
the budget located under department line item detail, department 101 in the labor
category, page 1, and the figure was $197,665, which included $75,000 for Council
Assistants.
Mayor Daly said he wished to talk about the five year plan proposed by the Community
Services Department, referring to a memo received the day before, he asked about the
timing and funding for some of the projects. Line item 15, various parks, he asked for
an explanation.
Chris Jarvi, Director of Community Services, answered that each year that amount was
set aside to deal with unexpected items with parks, it could be a small study or some
concrete, and sometimes it was not spent.
Mayor Daly said he saw nothing in the five-year plan regarding the west library. Mr.
Jarvi responded that staff's intent was to combine the west Anaheim Community Center
project with the library on the Maxwell Park site and augment library uses at the same
time.
Mayor Daly asked the budget for the downtown Community Center and Mr. Jarvi
answered he thought it was about $8 million. Mayor Daly asked if $4.3 million was
sufficient to complete a library project as well as the downtown project and Mr. Jarvi
answered that staff had not had an opportunity to present the plan to Council. He said
staff had identified a building that included a youth center with a gymnasium, general
purpose meeting rooms, a senior component which staff would recommend for
Brookhurst Community Center because seniors largely used Brookhurst. The Youth
Center, staff had not identified a location, was line item 20. He added that staff did not
believe that all the units could be accommodated on the Maxwell Park site, it was too
small.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 32
City Manager Ruth reminded that the downtown Community Center had a gymnasium
associated with that project. Mayor Daly asked Mr. Jarvi if there was a gymnasium
associated with the west Anaheim Community Center and Mr. Jarvi said the gym was
number 20. Mr. Jarvi added that there was additional money for Maxwell Park general
improvements on line 16, $1.1 million currently in the State budget and the City hoped it
would be eventually funded and would help with the physical improvements to the site,
including the expansion of the Edison right of way.
Mayor Daly asked why it was in the second year rather than the first. Mr. Jarvi said all
that was contained in the first year was the planning of the site, the actual architecture
and lay out of the site, the actual construction would not take place until the second
year.
Mayor Daly noted there was nothing budgeted in the first year for Maxwell Park and Mr.
Jarvi said if the City was successful in getting the $1.1 million, they would use some of
that to augment the design money in line item number 6.
Council Member Feldhaus asked what improvements were planned for Maxwell Park
and Mr. Jarvi said the farm house would be taken down, parking lot would be expanded,
and a skateboard park.
Council Member Tait noted that Maag Ranch acquisition was shown in year five of the
plan with a footnote that the property may not be available in year five He said staff
might want to consider changing priorities to move that time line up.
Mr. Jarvi said that was assuming that the entire site fell out of the deal with the existing
developer, noting that it was put in the fifth year because they were not sure where it
would go. He said that the first year sum total of all projects was $10 million, which
would be a trade out if the City acquired the whole site, all of which was a Council
decision.
Council Member Tait said he would not want to trade for the parks planned in west or
central Anaheim, but the funds budgeted for the Hills golf club house could be used for
a down payment.
Mayor Daly suggested that Council consider moving as many of the projects as they
could to the first year, including Maag Ranch. He noted that La Palma Park acquisition
and development was spread over five years and he suggested it be completed within
the next two years, the same with Maag Ranch, west Anaheim projects in the proposed
budget scheduled for the next two years.
Council Member Kring mentioned that there was an offer on the Maag Ranch and Mr.
Jarvi said that was correct, they had an option until November 20th where they either had
to purchase the site or pay substantial renewal fees, which would give them another
year.
Council Member Kring said she agreed with Mayor Daly about moving the time frames
up on the park development, but there were things that Council needed to attend to in
the budget.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 33
Mayor Daly suggested that staff could come back with a report on how to expedite some
of the projects and Council Member Tait said he supported that and asked the City
Manager to return to Council with a funding plan based on two years. The Mayor asked
if it was possible to complete the La Palma Park within two or three years and Mr. Jarvi
said it would depend on the willingness of the property owners to sell the property to the
City, the acquisition shown in the first year of the five year plan was for the first two
phases of acquisition which was all interior properties. He felt that would take about a
year and after that design could occur. He said it could be accelerated if the City
received the state park bond funds.
Mayor Daly asked if there was support from Council to move that project forward in two
years and Council Member Tait said he wished to see everything other than the Hills
golf club house expedited. Council Member Kring said she felt the Council needed to
meet with staff regarding the five-year plan, maybe not all were included in the budget.
Mr. Jarvi said some were identified funds that the City knew they were going to get,
some were speculative, particularly the community improvement fund monies which may
not come on line for three, four or five years.
Council Member Kring said that there were "wishes" in the list and Mr. Jarvi said some
funding had been identified but there was $67 million worth of projects, $40 in identified
funding. She wondered how feasible it would be to put five years worth of plans into two
years with a $27 million shortfall. He added that another component was the lack of
staff to complete projects, pacing out the projects helped.
Mayor Daly said this came back to where the priorities were, adding that he thought the
money could be found in the budget and in cash flow to do the projects faster, it was a
matter of what the Council wanted to do.
Council Member Kring said if there was going to be a wish list, she would like to see
curbing, gutters and sidewalks maintained better.
Mayor Daly noted that the budget carried reserves or in some cases funds and balances
in certain areas, which was done from year to year, and staff reported that the City did
not have funds to do more sidewalk repair, or to expedite parks and he said he felt they
did. He said if Council did not wish to have projects completed faster than staff
recommended, that was a different aspect than could the City afford to do them.
Council Member Kring said she would be willing to have staff look at both manpower
and financial resources.
Council Member Tait noted it would not be easy to find land for parks in the future and it
ShOuld be expedited, adding that he would suppod the suggestion to have staff report
back.
Council Member Kring said she wished to put more money in the budget for more
repairs of sidewalks and gutters. Mayor Daly said he would support that also.
SWOOJ J~)JO01 {~JOLU Pl!nq ol O00'Og~$ seM aJa4:i ':i~l~pnq p{)sodojd J~)JuaO UOp, UaAUO0
~,e45 uo le!luap!saJ 6u!pl!nq aq plnoM/(a41 6uptu!41 auoauJos '000£ pue O0~L~EI JoJ a1!s
1eql JoJ uo!leo!ldde ue pa^!asaj 6u!uueld leq$ pauJjoju! aq pue al!s $eq~ ~o dn ueap
uo podaj e pa^!aoaj peq ipuno0 :iq6noq:i aq p!es aH '/(l!l!qe$su! pue su!xo$ jo asneoaq
SUO!]e]!LU!I luaLudola^ap peq 1! pa~JodaJ !AJer 'JIAI 'uloou!l pue qsea8 'aug al!s 'le!$ua:iod
6u!^eq tz xluo 's),ol paz!s ajse g~ aql uo ieql pau!eldxa sneqpla:l JaqLual~ IpunoO
-a JaM suop, do s,lpunoO ie4~ pue spunj aq$ Jo uo!:ieueldxa ue 41!M
IpunoO oi UJn],~)J plnO~A JJels p!es/(auaaMS Jo:ioaJ!C] asueu!-I 's~)!],!Jo!Jd uo uo!u!do ue
ao!OA O18oueqo e aAeq pue ueld eqi u! 6u!qlfuaAa 8oeld ol palueM aH 'pa~tse iou seM
I!ounoO pue ~Jed euJled e'l ueql aJOLU paJaJ],eLU :jell pappap aUOaLUOS pue/(aUOLU lueJ6
ale:is Jo] pa!ldde aug aLUOS asneoaq aug Jea/( u! SeM 1! MOU '1S!1 all UO ajaqM~ue Jeadde
lou p!p asnoH/(uoloO Jaq],ol/N 'ueld Je~/(-~A!J all 6u!peaj uaqM '/(lleu!l]!Jo aug Jea/(
u! SeM 1! ~iU!NI $OU p!p aq p!es aq pue aug Jea/( u! SeM luaLudolaAap uo!:i!s!nboe asnoH
/~uoloO Jaq:iol/%J all p!es/(lea Jo/(el/N 'aug Jea/( 6u!ldope/(lug SeM l!3unoO lnq 'led!ou!Jd
u! pa:idope 6u!aq SeM ueld Jea/( aAg all 'ueld all ~o aug Jea/( 6u!ldope/(lug SeM I!ounoO
p!es/(aUaaMg Jol:)~j!a aoueu!-I 'uelcl sloa!oJcl le:i!deO Jea/(-aAij e pue ueld 6u!puads
Jea/(-~uo e 6u!ldope SeM I!gunoO aq:i ':ia6pnq aql 6u!:idope/(q J! pa~tse/(lea Jo/(e~
'Paz!leug a4 'sa!l!jo!jd jo JalleLu e lie seM
11 'palal~pnq seM 1elm aAoqe pue JaAO 'punj/(ep/(U!eJ all seM :ieql 'saAJasaJ u! lunoLue
u!epao e aAeq plnoqs/(1!0 all ieql palou aH 'sa!lpo!jd jo uo!:isanb e seM ~,eql ilaJ
aN 'pa:iueM IpunoO s~ileMap!s ageldaJ lou ueo 's)ped/(nq lou pingo IpunoO 'luatuaoeldaj
alO!qaA a~!l sl~u!ql Joj saAjasaj daap peq/q!O aq:i ~! 1ell llaJ aN 'paujjoju! aq 'lal~pnq
all u! pa:)eldaJ asoql aAoqe pue JSAO 'SalO!qaA ~O :iuauJaoeldaJ all Jo~ saAJasaj u! UO!II!LU
Z$ ISOLUle 'UO!II!Lu J]'95 O1 aonpaj ol paloa!oJd 'uo!ll!uJ Z'65 le SeM punJ aAjasaJ/(iddns
luaLud!nba pazpo),oud all '/(1!0 all az!pjedoa! lou plnoM qo!qM 'sjellop UO!II!LU aajql Jo
OM1 'aUg JOJ paddel aq pingo qo!qM 'aAjasaj UO!II!LU g~,$ e peq 'punj leJaual~ all 'inoqe
mtods aq punj puggas all 's)JleMap!s uo luads aq pingo leq:i UO!II!LU g$ aq plnOM aJaql
'paluasajd se la6pnq pasodojd aN11dope lou p!p I!ounoO aq:i ~! 1ell pau!eldxa aH 'jea/(
Ixau uo!ll!uJ 9'£$ ol 1! aonpaj plnoM uo!:idope lal~pnq pasodoJd 'jea/( s!ql spunj aAjasaj
u! UO!II!LU 95 pa!jjeo punj aAJasaj Ja]uao UOpUaAUO0 all leql paLUJOJU!/(lea Jo/(eJAJ
· spunj aAjasaj luajaj~!p
jo ls!l e pjeAuoj 6upq JJ, els aAeq o1 a~t!l plnoM aq p!es aH 'seaje luaJaJJ!p uo s!seqduja
6u!oeld Jo uo!loaJ!p 6u!6ueqo SeM IpunoO a>t!l papunos 1! Mou pue sa!l!jo!jd I]u!pje6aj
uo!loaJ!p JJe],s 8q:l 8Ae6 I!ounoO foenJqa-I U! ieql pajaqLuaujaj sneqpla-i JaqLua~ i!ounoO
lzS :lgVd
O00Z: 'OZ: ~tNnr
S:l/flNII/! lIONflOg LLIO - I/IIIHVNV 40 A.LIO
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 35
and other improvements at the arena. He suggested that was one place to save
$450,000, stating that was less important to the community at this time. He suggested
that be delayed. Mayor Daly moved to remove from the budget the improvement funds
for the arena, approximately $450,000 and he asked for clarification of the dollar figure.
Greg Smith, General Manager, responded that the area improvements had been
budgeted at $435,000, at least half was replacement of the scoreboards that did not
keep correct time. With a large tournament scheduled for next year, Mr. Smith said the
plan was to replace the scoreboards. If the scoreboards were not replaced, something
else would have to be done, he said.
Council Member Feldhaus asked Mr. Smith if he ran out of money in his allocation for
the Convention Center expansion and Mr. Smith said there was an element of his
budget, a draw from retained earnings, to fully fund the expansion project. When the
bids came in on the last phase, they were more than the estimates. Part of the reason
for the draw was that the bid award was higher than what the estimates were and he
said he believed that the Council was advised that the Convention Center retained
earnings could fund the additional amount of money so now it was being budgeted as
part of the last payment made to the contractor.
Mayor Daly asked if the retained earnings was the same as the fund balance, was $8.8
million at the end of this fiscal year and it reduces to $3.8 million at the end of the next
fiscal year. He wondered if the $5 million was going to pay for the overage and Mr.
Smith responded yes. Mr. Smith added that part of the retained earnings that were
remaining were restricted cash, the amount of money that was held in the Hilton Hotel
Parking Fund dedicated by agreement for the ultimate replacement of the parking
garage at the Hilton Hotel.
Council Member Kring wished to clarify the Mayor's motion as being to take the
$450,000 that was earmarked to upgrade the arena and take it out of the Convention
Center budget. Mayor Daly added that it could be revisited in six months or a year.
Council Member Kring said she could not go along with that, the arena was an asset to
the community, there were basketball tournaments scheduled and they needed
scoreboards.
Mayor Daly asked Mr. Smith what he estimated to spend the year after next in arena
improvements and Mr. Smith said no number had been budgeted and Mayor Daly said
he read in the newspaper $4 or $5 million.
Regarding a question from Council Member Tait pertaining to the budgeted item for a
new scoreboard for the arena, Greg Smith responded that it had not been bid but staff
estimated the cost to be around $225,000. Council Member Tait asked if the current
scoreboard worked and Mr. Smith said it did not keep appropriate time and pads could
not be purchased to repair it. Council Member Tait said he would rather see the existing
board repaired.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 36
Council Member McCracken noted the Charter required the budget to be approved by
the end of June and there would be an August review and revision and if there were any
funds at time, staff could be directed to look for additional sources for those items.
Mayor Daly moved to hold the $435,000 until August when the budget was revisited,
seconded by Council Member Kring. Motion carried unanimously.
Regarding funds from the Orange County bankruptcy settlement, Mayor Daly suggested
that the funds earmarked for General Plan updates, including the funds set aside for two
years out, be spent on capital projects and it be held until the August discussion.
Finance Director Sweeney asked if his desire was to appropriate the first year and hold
the remainder or hold the entire $2 million. Mayor Daly moved to recommend
appropriating the first $400,000 increment and the remainder go to the August
discussion, seconded by Council Member Tait. Mayor Daly clarified that it was $1.6
million of the $2 million that would be held until the August meeting.
Council Member McCracken reminded Council that the update of the General Plan was
a priority given to staff last January. Mayor Daly said he thought there were other ways
to fund the updates.
Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Sweeney said in August, staff would inform Council as to what happened with the
appropriations and revenues for the current fiscal year, let Council know if there were
any surplus funds, and let them know if they needed to make any changes in
appropriations. He said it would be expanded to discuss the reserve policies and
balances in accounts. He said he would list the reserve accounts, total in the accounts,
policies and options.
Item 5, island median rehabilitation, Mayor Daly asked for more information and Chris
Jarvi, Community Services Director responded that was bankruptcy money set aside to
deal with priorities on City medians that needed rehabilitation. Mayor Daly asked if there
were any other median landscape items in the proposed budget and Mr. Jarvi said he
did not believe so. Mayor Daly asked if there was any other capital money for
landscape medians in the proposed budget. Gary Johnson, City Engineer, indicated no.
Mayor Daly said he wished to go on record as wanting to find more money for landscape
medians outside the resort area. Council Member Tait said he agreed, he noted
surrounding cities had beautiful grass landscaped medians.
Mayor Daly said he wished to add west Anaheim library as a line item and he asked
when the studies regarding the status of library services in west Anaheim would be
completed. Mr. Jarvi said they were very close to being finished with the west Anaheim
Community Center Study but it did not address a library, only appurtenant uses in the
adjacent Community Center. He said their priority was central library and a study was
almost finished that would be presented for central library.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 37
Mayor Daly moved to add to the five-year plan, a line item for west Anaheim library and
he asked staff to present plans and thoughts in August about modifying or replacing,
Council Member McCracken seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Council Member Kring moved to have staff propose funds in August for sidewalks,
gutters and curbs, seconded by Mayor Daly. Motion carried unanimously.
Mayor Daly explained that he wished staff to report back on the Anaheim Resort Area
spending plan, $6 million in reserves or retained earnings and it was projected to be the
same in 2000/2001.
Council Member Tait said as Council voted on the budget, he wished to clarify that he
would vote against the $6.2 million budgeted for the Anaheim Hills golf club house,
adding he would rather see the funds used for parks. He moved to hold the decision on
the $6.2 million expenditure until the August meeting, seconded by Mayor Daly.
Council Member McCracken said it was continued to next meeting, July 11, 2000.
Mayor Daly asked Council to vote on Council Member Tait's motion first, to hold the
decision on the $6.2 million expenditure until the August meeting. Three ayes: Mayor
Daly, Council Member Feldhaus, Council Member Tait. Two noes: Council Member
McCracken, Council Member Kring. Motion carried.
Mayor Daly moved to approve the remainder of the fiscal year 2000/2001 budget,
seconded by Council Member Kring. Motion carried unanimously.
Regarding Item A30, various resolutions pertaining to changes in management
compensation, Council Member Tait moved to continue to the next meeting, seconded
by Mayor Daly.
Council Member Tait again said he thought this was a 10% across the board increase in
compensation for management, ongoing cost of $2 million a year, adding that he did not
care for across the board increases.
City Manager Ruth explained that it was not a 10% across the board raise. The
structure change was not funded, the 31/2% funded July I was funded out of the PERS
assets and the second year funding was also out of PERS assets, an ongoing cost of $2
million which would be funded out of the surplus fund for at least 16 years and more
likely 30 years. He said there was no hit on the general fund of the City.
Council Member Kring clarified that the only funds coming from the general fund was the
$150,000 for performance awards plus the $144,000 for one-time adjustments.
City Manager Ruth explained that it was really about $290,000, most of which was in
public service, and that funding was absorbed in the operational budgets and in the
current budget. He noted that staff followed Council instruction to look at the
classification and compensation plan, which had not been reviewed in 10 years, an
outside consultant who was an exped in the area was hired. The consultant recognized
the City was having a turn over problem, had fallen behind in the market, was having a
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 38
recruitment and retention problem and he felt his series of recommendations would
position the City to be more competitive in the market, to recognize some of the short
fall, inequity problems, and compaction problems. Mr. Ruth said he thought only 40
positions out of 250 were being adjusted. He added that a very creative, very
innovative, dynamic management staff generated a lot of the revenue being talked
about this date.
City Manger Ruth said this was a performance based plan, as Council Member Tait said
he would support, the adjustments were not automatic, employees were adjusted based
on their performance.
Mayor Daly asked if the 3% structural increase was an across the board increase.
Human Resources Director, David Hill, explained the salary range would be changed but
the actual pay for management employees would not until their anniversary date where
they would be eligible for a merit increase and on that date there would be a
determination whether or not they should be given an increase. He said there was no
funded; across the board 3% pay increase, only the salary range was adjusted 3%. He
said that allowed for a slightly higher range for recruitment purposes and it also allowed
the City to retain the employees because they know if they perform, they would be able
to move through their salary range.
Council Member Tait asked if there was an across the board adjustment of categories,
ranges. Mr. Hill responded yes, the whole structure was being moved at one time, but it
was not funded. The $290,000 paid for increasing the merit pool slightly from the old
merit pool, which gave employees an opportunity from 1% to 5%, now being increased
from 1% to a maximum of 7% for those in the exceptional performance category. The
other increase cost was for the 40 occupations, which were employees that were found
to be at least 10% below the current labor market, and those 40 were being given a 5%
special equity adjustment. Council Member Tait said he would vote no.
Mayor Daly said he had not heard a convincing argument from the consultant. He said
the pay range for every management employee was being raised by 3% and even
though there was no immediate funding tied to that, funding would kick in over a period
of years as jobs were vacated, the new employee would be hired in the new salary
range.
Dave Hill answered that was one of the costs; the consultant recommended the City
review and adjust salary ranges annually. As the consultant found, by not doing that,
over the last 10 years it had produced slippage in terms of the City's position in the labor
market.
Mayor Daly asked for an example of where a high range for a management employee
was too low. Mr. Hill said the consultant found that management salaries, across all
industries, were moving at a 3% to 4% annual rate and in order for the City to remain
competitive, the ranges should be adjusted. Mayor Daly said the consultant did not
present that information to Council. He added that he was troubled with the $110 million
in CAL PERS and that the Council could not spend the money on something else. He
said it could be spent on something else if the City put irs mind to it, adding that the
consultant talked like that money was gone. He said he would favor some of the
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 39
proposed resolutions, but not all of them. The recommendation of having a 15%
supervisory range, he said he did not buy it. He wished to see facts and evidence that
the City was having trouble recruiting quality candidates.
Council Member Kring remembered a candidate in the Utility Department that was lost
to another organization because of salary and benefits. She said staff should add the
PERS super fund to the list of legislative priorities.
Motion to continue Item A30 for two weeks failed with a vote of two ayes: Mayor Daly
and Council Member Tait. Three noes: Council Member McCracken, Council Member
Feldhaus and Council Member Kring.
Council Member Kring moved to approve Item A30, seconded by Council Member
Feldhaus.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-122 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM adjusting rates of compensation for classifications designated as
Executive Management and superseding Resolution No. 92R-19 and amendments
thereto.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-123 RESOLUTIN OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM adjusting rates of compensation for classifications designated as
Administrative Management and superseding Resolution No.92R-22 and amendments
thereto.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-124 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM adjusting rates of compensation for classifications designated as Middle
Management and superseding Resolution No. 92R-21 and amendments thereto.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-125 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM adjusting rates of compensation for classifications designated as
Professional and superseding Resolution No. 92R-18 and amendments thereto.
RESOLULTION NO. 2000R-126 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM adjusting rates of compensation for classifications designed as
Supervisory and superseding Resolution No. 92R-20 and amendments thereto.
RESOLULTION NO. 2000R-127 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM amending Resolution No. 92R-17 adopting Personnel Rules
applicable to employees in Management, Confidential and Non-Represented part time
classifications.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-128 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM establishing rates of compensation for job classifications designated as
Police Safety Management.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-129 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM establishing rates of compensation for job classifications designated as
Fire Safety Management.
CITY OF ANAHEIM - CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
JUNE 20, 2000
PAGE 40
RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-130 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM establishing new management compensation policies for Executive,
Administrative, Middle Management, Supervisory and Professional employees including
Fire and Police Safety Management and superseding Resolution No. 94R-150 and
amendments thereto.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000R-131 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM authorizing PERS employer paid member contributions for Management
employees.
Roll call on the motion to approve Resolution Nos. 2000R-122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127,
128, 129, 130, and 131. Three ayes: Council Member McCracken, Council Member
Feldhaus, Council Member Kring. Two noes: Council Member Tait, Mayor Daly.
Motion carried.
COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS:
Council Member Tait congratulated the Salvation Army for the ground breaking of the
Women's Adult Rehabilitation Center and he wished them the best of luck.
Council Member McCracken mentioned the various 4th of July celebrations throughout
the community.
ADJOURNMENT: By general consent of Council, the meeting was adjourned at 11:25
P.M. Next regularly scheduled Anaheim City Council Meeting is July 11, 2000.
Respectfully submitted:
Sheryll Schroeder, CMC/AAE
City Clerk