Loading...
CAC 20130110_Presentation_Morrison_DemographicsAnaheimAnaheim’’s Evolving s Evolving Demographic SettingDemographic Setting Peter A. Morrison January 10, 2013 petermorrison@me.com-(310) 266-9580 Contact: AgendaAgenda How City’s demographic Issue:  setting shapes minority voters’ potential to elect candidates of their choice To better understand this Focus:  setting and how it is changing Where Demographics MatterWhere Demographics Matter Enables a group to use its At-large:  overall voting strength to elect a 2 nd highest vote-getter Enables a group to use its By district:  concentrated voting strength in an area (district) to elect the single winner there Key TakeKey Take--Away PointsAway Points 1.Certain groups are gaining electoral strength as the City’s population matures 2.Things aren’t always what they seem: Many adults aren’t now eligible to vote 3.Past City Council elections offer lessons on how future ethnic candidates can get elected Overview of AnaheimOverview of Anaheim’’s s PopulationPopulation Rapid Population Growth Residential Patterns: 2010 Demographics by Race/Ethnicity 100% Others* 9 12 15 Black* 80% 31 Asian* 60% 47 Hispanic 53 White* 40% 57 20% 36 28 0% 1990 2000 2010 Change in Distribution of Eligible Voters 100% Others* 12 17 Black* 80% 24 Asian* 60% 35 Hispanic White* 40% 58 43 20% 0% 2000 2010 And What’s In Store . . . 100% 10 Others* 17 80% Black* Asian* 35 60% 68 Hispanic 40% White* 43 20% 16 0% Eligible Voters US Born Under Age 18 * Non-Hispanic The CityThe City’’s Future s Future Eligible VotersEligible Voters Anticipated Future Shares of Eligible Voters 100% Others* 17 16 17 15 Black* 80% Asian* 60% 35 37 40 42 Hispanic White* 40% 43 20% 41 38 36 0% 2010 Nov-12 Nov-16 Nov-20 Lessons From PastLessons From Past City Council Elections City Council Elections City Council Election Winners: City Council Election Winners: 20022002--20122012 EthnicityNo. runningWinnersWin rate Latino18422% White31619% Other13215% ??100% Source: City of Anaheim. November 2012 Election Vote Percentage JORDAN BRANDMAN 26,332 19.3% LUCILLE KRING 25,464 18.7% JOHN LEOS 19,051 14.0% JENNIFER RIVERA 14,091 10.3% STEVEN ALBERT CHAVEZ LODGE 13,834 10.1% LINDA LINDER 13,456 9.9% BRIAN NEIL CHUCHUA 9,534 7.0% RODOLFO "RUDY" GAONA 7,703 5.6% DUANE ROBERTS 6,914 5.1% November 2010 Election Vote Percentage GAIL EASTMAN 20,389 19.0% KRIS MURRAY 17,871 16.6% JOHN LEOS 12,966 12.1% LINDA LINDER 8,296 7.7% ROBERT NELSON 7,176 6.7% "HOAGY" HOLGUIN 7,165 6.7% BILL DALATI 5,392 5.0% BRIAN NEIL CHUCHUA 5,070 4.7% SANDY PARKE 5,010 4.7% ROBERT JESUS FLORES 4,886 4.5% DUSTIN APODACA 4,176 3.9% DENNIS T. VARNUM 3,859 3.6% JOHN SANTOIANNI 2,982 2.8% RUDY GAONA 2,323 2.2% Key TakeKey Take--Away PointsAway Points 1.Certain groups are gaining electoral strength as the City’s population matures 2.Things aren’t always what they seem: Many adults aren’t now eligible to vote 3.Past City Council elections offer lessons on how future ethnic candidates can get elected Questions?Questions?