Loading...
RA1995/03/28 (2)Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MARCH 28, 1995, 5=00 P.M. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: Tait, Lopez, Zemel, Feldhaus, Daly AGENCY MEMBERS: None CITY MANAGER: James Ruth CITY ATTORNEY: Jack White SECRETARY: Leonora N. Sohl EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Lisa Stipkovich A complete copy of the agenda for the meeting of the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency was posted at 2:00 p.m. on March 24, 1995 at the Civic Center kiosk, containing all items as shown herein. Chairman Daly called the regular meeting of the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency to order at 5:57 p.m. FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY in the amount of $140,516.38 for the period ending March 24, 1995, in accordance with the 1994-95 Budget, were approved. ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA: There were no additions to agenda items. ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST: There were no speakers under items of public interest. PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDA ITEMS: Public input received on Agency Item 2 (see discussion under that item). CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS I - 3: On motion by Agency Member Daly, seconded by Agency Member Tait, the following actions were authorized in accordance with the reports and recommendations furnished each Agency Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda. Agency Member Daly offered Resolution Nos. ~RA95-3 and ARA95-4 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. 1. 123: RESOLUTION NO. ARA95-03: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF COOPERATION AGREEMENT NO. 86 FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WITH THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (Installation of landscaping and irrigation improvements along East Street and Lincoln Avenue.) Roll Call Vote on Resolution No. ARA95-3 for adoption: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: AGENCY MEMBERS: AGENCY MEMBERS: Tait, Lopez, Zemel, Feldhaus, Daly None None T~e Chairman declared Resolution No. ARA95-3 duly passed and adopted. 2. 123: RESOLUTION NO. ARA95-04: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND FRY'S ELECTRONICS; AND FURTHER APPROVING A COOPERATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. Jeff Kirsch, 2661 West Palais Road, Anaheim. His concerns related to traffic, and in particular that most of the other Fry's stores are located in closer proximity to freeway exits than this proposal, so there is not so much impact on local streets. As part of the CEQA determination, is there additional traffic impact information the Agency could share? His main problem with the 95-1 Anaheim Civic Centert ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MARCH 28t 1995m 5=00 P.M. proposal is given the City's economic picture, should it sacrifice sales tax revenue where there might not be job creation. Phillip Knypstra, 2520 Gelid Avenue, Anaheim. He did not believe the data given is sufficient for the Agency to make an i~telligent decision on this redevelopment project. It is important to pursue Redevelopment, his concern is that it pits one city bid against another redevelopment bid from another city, and he is not sure that we really know what the trade-offs are. He also did not understand the JTPA connection. Lisa Stipkovich, Executive Director, Redevelopment Agency responded to the public input and questions: A traffic study was performed and it was approved, and indicated some mitigation needed in particular the expansion of the Tustin bridge. However this use vs. industrial in place is a pretty good choice in terms of traffic mostly occuring during off-peak traffic hours and weekends. She stated that they did analyze the benefit to the City and do see a net gain as this is presently a vacant defense industry building, hot being used. Because of the size and nature of the building there are some external rehabilitation costs. Concerning the JTPA involvement, there will be 3-400 jobs created, and by involving JTPA Anaheim residents can have some priority on filling them. There is no tax revenue given until they reach $21 million and her department did verify sales taxes received from Fry's in other cities. She also noted on the issue of sales tax transfer that they do not see this organization as being in head-to-head competition with any business currently in the City. In conclusion, Ms. Stipkovich noted that it will be necessary to add to the wording of the resolution, that the Agency authorizes changes to this agreement which are in substantial conformance with the attached agreement, as there may be additional minor changes prior to actual execution of the document. Agency Member Tait noted that while he would like to see Fry's in Anaheim, he cannot support the agreement since it gives this business an unfair advantage over others. Roll Call Vote on Resolution No. ARA95-4 for adoption= AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS: Lopez, Zemel, Feldhaus, Daly NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: Tait ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: None ~he Chairman declared Resolution No. ARA95-4 duly passed and adopted. 3. 161: Approving minutes of the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency meeting held March 14, 1995. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR. MOTIONS CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Agency Member Daly moved to adjourn, Agency Member Feldhaus seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (6:18 p.m.) LEONORA N. SOHL, SECRETARY 95-2