1964/02/117493
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 11, 1964, 1:30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-74: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-74 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND DIR-
ECTING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF FEBRUARY il, 1964.
(Warrants Nos. 29598 to 29954, both inclusive, totaling $1,382,792.11)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote;
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-74 duly passed and adopted.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION - YALE~ BRUCE AND RUSSELL AVENUES: Council
action on the City Planning CommiSsion recommendation that the City assume re-
sponsibility for installation of cul-de-sacs for the stub ends of Yale, Bruce
and Russell Avenues, in Tract No. 3007, as Central Baptist Church completed
the firs± phase of their school-church facilities on property easterly of
said streets, prior to construction of the R-1 subdivision, was continued from
the meetings of 3anuary 28th and February 4th, 1964, to this date for further
report and recommendations°
Mr. Davis read report from the Planning Department, noting that
additional research proved the subdivision~ Orange County Tract No. 3007~,
was actually recorded prior to the time the first building permit was issued
for development of the church property. He advised that the original intent
was to eventually extend the three streets throu9h to Magnolia Avenue.
Discussion was held by the City Council and Assistant City Manager,
and at the conlcusion 'thereof, said matter was ordered taken off Agenda pend-
in9 additional study.
REQUEST - CITY BUSINESS LICENSE WAIVER: On the recommendations of the City Attorney,
action on request of Libres Foundation, Inc., for waiver of business license
conduct their activities~ continued from t'he meeting of February 4, 1964 to
this date~ was deferred to February 18~ 1964.
SIGN REQUEST - SECURITY FIRST NATIONAL BANK: Application submitted by Security First
National Bank requesting permission to erect a nonconforming sign at 3301 East
Anaheim Road~ was reviewed by the City Council together with plans and reports
from the Building~and Planning Departments°
On motion by Councilman Du'tton, seconded by Councilman Schutte~
said sign permit was granted as requested, subject to no projection over
the property line. MOTION CARRIED.
SIGN REQUEST - CUSTOM HOMES: Application submitted by Frank R. Krogman, requesting
permission to erect a 10 by 24 foot billboard sign advertising homes for sale, said
sign to be located at the southwest corner of Sunkist and Wagner Streets~ was
reviewed by the City Council together with plans and reports from the Building
and Planning Departments.
On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler,
said'sign permit was granted for a period of six months~ subject to applicant posting
a $100o00 bond to guarantee removal of the sign at the expiration of the time
limit. MOTION CARRIED~
SIGN REQUES/ - TRACT NO. 5227; Application submitted by $hattuck and McHone~ re-
questing permission to erect three temporary directional signs advertising
Tract No. 52279 was reviewed by the City Council together with plans and re-
ports from the Building and Planning Departments° Location of said signs to
be as follows:
7494
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 11~ 19641 1:30 P.M.
1. Southwest corner of Lincoln and Dale Avenues.
2. East side of Brookhurst Street, 175 feet north of Orange Avenue.
3. West side of Beach Boulevard~ 800 feet north of Orange Avenue°
On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton,
said sign permit was granted for a period of six months, subject to the
posting of a $100o00 bond for each sign to insure the removal thereof at
the expiration of the time limito MOTION CARRIED.
SIDEWALK WAIVER - 2133 SOUTH LOARA STREET: Request of Ao R. Dorrington for
waiver of sidewalk requirements at 2133 South Loara Street~ was submitted~
together with the report of the City Engineer recommending said request
be denied, based on the followin9 factors;
1. All recent developments in the area have been improved to ultimate,
including sidewalks.
2. One elementary school within ~ mile radius of property.
3. No existing sidewalk waivers within a 300 foc. t radius of subject
property,
4. Pedestrian travel was observed to be negligible when observed at 10;15
A~M., however after school hours liqht pedestrian traffic exists due
to recreational facilities available at 'the school.
On 'the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Schutte
moved said request be denied~ Councilman Chandler seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
SIDEWALK WAIVER .- 1009 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD: Request of Helen C. Langford
for waiver of sidewalk requirements at 1009 South Harbor Boulevard~ was
submitted together with reports from the City Engineer. (Conditional Use Permit
No. 27i)o
On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Krein
moved temporary waiver of sidewalks be 9ranted as requested, providing
that no permanent planting or permanent improvements be permitted in the
area reserved for future sidewalks, and that 50 feet of walk be construct-
ed when property 'to the south of subject property develops. Councilman
$chutte seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED.
PRIVATE PATROL APPLICATION: Application by 3ohn R. Buesing, 12311 Chapman
Avenue, Garden Grove, for permission to operate Harbor $ecurity~ a private
patrol service, including security guards, sentry'dogs, detective agency
and burglar alarm systems, for industrial factories, retail businesses
and construction sites within the City of Anaheim, was submitted toaether
with investigation report and recommendation for denial from the Chief of
Police°
Mayor Coons asked if the applicant was present and whether he
had reviewed the report from the Chief of Police.
Upon the applicant"s reply that he had not seen said report,
a copy thereof was furnished Mr. Buesing for review.
Later in the meeting, Mr. Buesing addressed the Council,
and discussed the Police investigation. He advised that he has been
in business since 19519 and noted 'the cities in which he holds an active
license for this service. With reference to the sentry dogs, Mr. Buesing
reported that 'they use German Shepherds, Doberman Pinschers and Japanese
Akitas.
Councilman $chutte moved that subject application be deferred
one week (February 18, 1964, 1:30 P.Mo), to allow 'the applicant an op-
portunity to review the Police Department recommendations with the Chief
of Police. Councilman Krein seconded the motion, MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Chandler requested the applicant to be prepared to
report further on how the dogs are used, and how safe they are where
innocent people in the area are concerned.
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - Co~C!L MINUTES - February I11 19641 !:30 P.M.
Mayor Coons left the meetin9~ 1~50 P.M.~ and Mayor Pro Tem
Chandler assumed Chairmanship of the meeting.
.~EC.LASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-64 - REQUEST TO AMEND DEED RESTRICTIONS= Communica-
tion dated January 31, 1964, from Mr~ Harry Knisely, Attorney for owners
of C-1 property located at 625 South Harbor Boulevard~ requesting amendment
to deed restrictions limiting subject property to business and professional
offices only by adding "jewelry and gift shop" to the permitted uses~ was
submitted and reviewed by the City Council.
Councilman Krein moved that a public hearing on said request be
scheduled before the City Council. Councilman $chutte seconded the motion.
Further discussion was held, and the City Attorney explained that
the requested amendment would not affec~ Ordinance No. 1739, which finalized
the C-1 Zoning; thereupon, Councilman Krein and Councilman $chutte withdrew
the foregoing motion.
RESOLUTION .NO. 64R-75: On 'the recommendations of the City Attorney, Council-
man Krein offered Resolution NCo 64R-75 for adoption, authorizing amendment
to deed restrictions recorded April 5, 1962 in Book 6066, Page 419, Records
of Orange County, as condition of Reclassification Proceedings No. 61-62-64,
to add jewelry and gift shop 'to the permitted use~ and further, 'that plans
be filed and approved by 'the City Council.
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CONSENTING TO THE AMEND-
MENT OF A CERTAIN DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS RECORDED IN CONNECTION WITH RE-
CLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-64~ AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO SIGN SUCH
CONSENT; AND REQUIRING THE FILING AND APPROVAL OF PLANS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF
THE PROPERTY REFERRED TO IN SAID RECLASSIFICATION PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING
PERMIT.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vo'te:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dui'ton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
TEMPORARILY' ABSENT: COUNCILMAN: Coons
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 64R-75 duly passed and
adopted.
Mayor Coon z-esumed Chairmanship of the meeting.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOg 528: Submitted by Samuel Fink and Jack Meshekow, re-
questing permission to establish a restaurant or tavern serving wine, beer,
and other alcoholic beverages; C-1 property located in the existing shopping
center at the northeast corner of Rio Vista Street and Lincoln Avenue.
'the City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1026,
Series 1963-64, denied Conditional Use Permit Nco 528.
No action was taken by the City Council.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 529: Submitted by Duayne D. Christensen, D.D.S., re-
questing permission to establish a family billiard center with no liquor
served; C-1 property located on the north side of Lincoln Avenue approximately
770 feet east of East Street (1287 "E~ East Lincoln Avenue)°
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1027,
Series 1963-64, 9ranted said Conditional Use Permit, subject to develop-
ment substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file
with the City of Anaheim, marked "Exhibits Noso 1, 2 and 3".
No action was taken by the City Council.
7496
City Hall~ Anaheim~ Califoxnia - GOUNGI.L MINUTES - february 11~ 1964~ 1:30
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION - AMMENDMENT TO M-i~ LIGHT INDUSTRIAl.
ZONE~ PARKING .- LANDgCAPING SETBACK REQUIREMENT; City Planning Commission
Resolution No, 1031, Series 1963-64~ recommending an amendment to Title lC,
Section 18o52 o£ the Anaheim Munic,-[pal Code pertaining to parking-landscap-
ing setback ~equirements in th~ M-i.~, Light Industrial Zone, was submitted
to 'the City Council°
On motion by Councilman Schut'te~ seconded by Councilman Krein,
the City Clerk was instructed [o se'[ public hearing before the City Council
to consider said re¢om~nenda~tion~ MOT[ON CARRIED.
PROPOSED STREET NAME CHANGES ~- LOS ANGELES STREET AND ANAHEIM ROAD: City Planning
Resolution No. 1032~ Series 1963-64, zecomm, ending that the name of Los Angeles
Street be changed 'to Anaheim Boulevard, was submitted for Council considera-
tion~ Al~o submitted wa~ City Planning Commission Resolution No. 1033, Series
1963~64~ recommending that the name of Anaheim Road be changed to Miraloma
Avenue,
The Mayor asked if anyone wlshed to address the City Council.
Mro C. B. Cook~ of Anaheim iFinance, 508 North Los Angeles Street,
addressed f. he Council protestin9 the proposed name change of Los Angeles
Street° That he recognized the confusion which occurs when those who are
unfamiliar 'with the area drive sion9 'the Santa Aha Freeway in search of the
main route to Anahe:im~ in that 'the only sign at the off-ramp leadin9 to the
Center.-City area~ by way of Los Angeles Street states "Katella Avenue-Anaheim"¢
however., he was of the opinion that thez. e should be other means of solvin9 the
problem than by chang:in9 the hi:;'tori..;al name of Los Angeles Street. M~. Cook
presented a petition of opposit:ion to said proposed change.~ containin9 many
signatures of busines.~ and professional people in Anaheim°
Council dlscussfon was held and Mayor Coons noted the time and
effort which has been expended in endeavoring to have a sign installed on
the freeway denoting the central core of Anaheim; however, the State Division
of Highways feels that 'to include ~'Los Angeles Street" on the sign at the off-
ramp which leads there'to would result :in confusion with the City of Los Angeles.
Councilman Chandle~ moved that Council consideration of the pro-
posed street name changes of Los Angeles Street and Anaheim Road be continued
to February 25~ 1964, 1:30 PoMo~ for an informal public discussion~ Council-
man Dutton ~econded the motion° MOTYON CARR!EDo
REVISED :TENTA'riVE MAP~ TRACT NO. 4230 iRECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-64 AND CONDI-
TIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 35'7): Developer, Linda Granada Incorporated; tract located
on the south side of Lincoln Avenue, approximately 660 feet west of the center
line of Beach Boulevard, and contains 27 proposed R-3 lots and 2 proposed
C-1 lo'tso
The City Planning Commission at their meeting held February 3, 1964,
approved said Tentative Map No° .4230 (Revision No. 6)~ subject to the follow-
ing conditions:
.
Se
e
5~
.
'That :~hould this ~ubdivi~ion be developed as more than one subdivision,
each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval.
That an easement shall be dedicated and an underground off-site storm
drain system shall be constructed 'to the Orange County Flood Control
Channel.
That approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 4230, Revision No. 6, is
9ranted subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 62-63-64.
Thai a predetermined price for Lots A, B and C shall be calculated
and an agreement for dedication entered into between the Developer
and the City of Anaheim prior to approval of the Final Tract Map.
The cost of Lots A~ B and C shall include land and a proportionate
share of the underground utilities and street improvements.
That Street "B" be relocated southerly to a location which is to 'the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
That Street "A" shall be recorded as Delano Stree't and Street "B"
shall be recorded as Graciosa Lane.
7497
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 11~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
Councilman Dutton moved that Revised Tenta'tive Map, Tract No.
4230, be approved, in accordance with the recommendations of the City
Planning Commission, Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOIION
CARRIED.
REVISED TENTATIVE MAP~ TRACT NO,~ 5141 {RECLASSIYICA~iON NOo 62-63-108); Develop-
er, Russell Jay; tract located on the west side of Beach Boulevard, 327
feet south of Lincoln Avenue~ and contains 4 proposed R-3 lotso
The City Planning Commission at thelr meetlng held February 3, 1964,
approved Tentative Map, Tract Nco 5141 (Revision Nco 2), subject to the
following conditions:
le
e
Se
e
e
That should thls subdivision Oe developed as more than one subdivision,
each subdivision 'thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval,
That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract Nco 5141, Revision No. 2~
is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification Nco 62-63-108.
That an easement shall be dedicated and an underground off-site storm
drain shall be cons'tructed 'to the Orange County Flood Control Channel.
That Lot C~ Tract Nco 4230~ be acquired or a dedicated alley be
provided along the westerly tract boundary°
That Street "A~ be 64 feet in width°
That Beach Boulevard in front of the three ~Not a Part" parcels be
fully improved°
That Street ~'A~ shall be recorded as Adobe Drive and Street ~B"
shall be recorded as Graciosa Lane~
Councilman Krein moved that Revised Tentative Map~ Tract No.
5141, be approved in acoordan~:e with 'the re(;ommendations of 'the City Planning
Commissiono Councilman $chutte seconded the motion.~ Councilman Chandler
abstained from votlngo MOTION CARRiED.
FINAL NLAP~ IRACY NO. 5155 (RECLASSiFiCATiON NO~ 63.-64.-12): Developer, V~ Lo No
Construction Company; tract located on the south side of Orangewood Avenue,
660 feet east of Haster Street, and contains 24_proposed R-2 lots.
The City Engineer reported said final map conforms substantially
with the tentative map previously amended and approved; that bond has been
posted and forwarded to the City Attorney for approval, and required fees
paid. He further reported that Condition No~ 5~ requiring developer to
improve that portion of said traot marked "Not a part", has been met,
and neoessary rights-of-way on both Orangewood Avenue and Mountainvie~ Avenue
have been acquired by the Ci'ty~ and recommended approval of final map~ Tract
No. 51550
On the re~;ommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Chandler
moved final map of Tract No~ 5155 be approved~ subject to approval of the
bond by 'the City A'ttorney's officeo Councilman Krein seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED~
~ONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 400 - REVISED PLANS AND ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE
APPLICATION: Mr. Geisler reported on request dated January 27, 1964, submitted
by Harry Auswacks~ new owner of property lo~ated at 1813 South Manchester
Avenue~ for approval of revised plans for existing restaurant operation
to be moved to another portion of the same building; further, that Con-
ditional Use Permit No. 400 allows the sale of beer at said restaurant in
conjunction with serving of mealso He called attention to alcoholic
beverage license application for New On-Sale Beer license at 1813-C South
Manchester Avenue, filed by Jack Neal Irby~ which on December 3, 1963, the
City Council authorized to be protested with the Alcoholic Beverage Control
Board, as the existing C~i Zoning does not allow sale of beer to be con-
sumed on the premises°
Revised Plans were reviewed by the Ci'ty Council~ and the Mayor
asked if the applicant was present and wished to address the City Council.
Mr. Jack Irby addressed the Council explaining the Revised Plans~
and noted that in the center of the restaurant there will be three tables
7498
City H.Dll~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 11~ 1964~ 1;30 P.M.
with twelve chairs, not a pool table as shown on the plans. He advised
that the floor plan should also show a door from the rear of the kitchen
to the hall and doors from the l:all into the restrooms.
Mayor Coons noted 'that two applications for hofbrau on the subject
property have been denied in the past~ and that the revised floor plan is
marked with the words ~Proposed Hofbrau'~, and shows a bar with fourteen
stools,
Mr, Irby advised tha~t the opera~tion will be the same as it now
exists, and that the counter is incorporated due to lack of sufficient
space for additional tables and chalrs~ the height of said counter
to be a compromise between the height of a bar and a coffee-Shop counter.
Council discussion was held~ and at 'the conclusion thereof~ on
the recommendations of the City Attorney, Councilman Chandler moved that
the operation approved under Conditional Use Permit No. 400 be permitted
to move to another portion of the same building, under the same conditions
as outlined under said conditional use permit~ Councilman Dutton seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
The City Attorney was directed to withdraw protest filed with the
Alcoholic Beverage Con'trol Board again$'t the application filed by Mr. Irbyo
lin answer to request for clarification regarding the height of
the counter, Mzo irby was advised to consult with the City Attorney.
VARIANCE NOo 852 -REVISED PLANS: Revised plans submitted by Joseph Dienstfrey
in connection with Variance No,, 852, were reviewed by the City Council
together with reports from the Planning Depaztment-Development Review and
City Engineer (property located at 6~1 South Brookhurst Street).
Mr~ Robert Davis :reported that although the variance was originally
Mt. anted for a twel,ze unit motel? plus ~otox'e buildings and a coffee-shop~
Mr.., Dienstfrey reque~,'ts 'to expand the existing motel use by the addition
of ei,~t un~-s and omi~ the s,~o~'~e~-' and coffee-shop
On the re~ommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman Chandler
moved it be the findln9 of the City Council that the proposed addition
to 'the use granted 'under Variance Nco 852 does not create a substantial
burden, change the land use~ nor change the characteristics as to abutting
property~ and that revised plan marked Exhibits Nos, 1 through 4 inclusive,
Revision No. 19 be approved. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED. i~Plans dated th~'~_~ date and ~_gned by Mayor Coons.)
ORANGE COUNTY iFEN[ATi'VE MAP~. '[RAC'[ NO~ 4427: Developer, Mervin B. Johnson;
tract located south of the Bah'la Aha Pi. ve:r, north of the Riverside Freeway~
and east of the Anaheim C~r,y l~m~t~, and ontains approximately 101.4 acres
and 384 R-1 lot~
Mr o Kre;~dt briefed ex<';e:rpt from the City Planning Commission
meeting held February 3, 1964~ noting that the map is Revision No. 4 of
tentative map p~ev:,.ou$ly ~ubm~tted and approved~ and that said revised map
conforms to the City of Anaheim standards,, He reported 'that the City
Planning Commis-~on recommended that approval thereof ~e recommended to
the Orange County Planning Comm~_'ss_ton by the City Council.
0
On motion by Councilman $¢hutte, seconded by Councilman Krein~
Orange County Tentative Map, lract No., 4427, Revision No. 4, was approved
and the City Plann~ng Commission ~ecommendation was ordered transmitted to
the Orange County Planning Commission,, ~O"FION CARRIED.
VARIANCE NO. 1581: Communl~at'ton dated Feb~'uary 6, 1964, from Kenneth Keesee,
requesting ~larificat~.on of dedi:~ation fo~ street widenin9 as condition of
Varance No,, 1581~ was submit'ted and read.
Plans and file we~'e zeviewed by the City Council~ and it was
noted that the Clr<~.ulation Element of the General Plan, adopted in the year
7499
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - february 11~ 1964~ 1:30
of 1960, establishes an ultimate width of 50 feet of the center line of
Los Angeles Street south of Katella Avenue~ and the Right-of-Way Division~
in connection with subject variance~ prepared necessary documents accordingly.
Mro Kreidt briefed the his'tory of Variance Nco 1581, referring to
a strip map of the area~ and noted that the City Planning Commission, at thelr
meetlng held february 3, 1964, clarified their original intent for the dedi-
cated setback required under subject variance to be a total width of 42 feet
from the center llne of the street~ in conformance with the Edison Company
property to the north° This actlon, he ad'vised~ will be forwarded for Council
consideration in the near future°
Mro Kenneth Keesee9 809 South Clementine Street, addressed the
Council advising that he anticipates future development and street dedication
from his property adjacent 'to subject parcel on 'the north, that the properties
located further north are setback 30 feet from the center line of the street,
and if an additional 20 feet are required~ 30 per cent of those properties
will be taken. He presented copies of the map for Council review, and noted
that with 'the 42 foot dedication he is losing 2400 square feet of his property,
and would have no room left for advertising his business if he gave an additional
8 feet° Mro Keesee contended that the 42 foot width was understood and agreed
upon by 'the City Planning Commission at the time the 'variance was granted,
however he indicated his willingness 'to dedicate 'the additional 8 feet when
other property owners along the street a~e required to do soo
City Engineer~ 3ames Maddox~ explained the planned future' 52 foot
roadway on South Los Angeles Street~ including a ten foot parkway, which will
become the frontage road along the freeway in conjunction with the Katella
Avenue overpass modification° He reported tha't a curb depression at the 42
foot setback line and temporary Ac C, paved driveway would be satisfactory
to the Engineering Division fo~ the ~resent, as this would be more economical
to remove when the ultimate street width is tmproved~ and it would 'be the
responsibility of 'the City to remove it when tha't 't~me comes.
Council discussion was held and Councilman Chandler called attention
to the original City Planning Commission Resolution No. 8379 Series 1963-64,
granting Variance Nco 15819 and read Conditions Nos° 1 and 5 of said resolu-
tion~ as follows:
"1. That 'the owners of subject property shall deed to 'the City of Anaheim
a strip of land 50 feet in width~ from the center line of the street,
along Los Angeles Street9 for street widening purposeso
5o That subject property shall develop substantially in accordance with the
Exhibit Nos° 1~ 2 and 3, provided that an additional eight (8) feet of
right-of-way be reflected in the plans~ and that the future highway
right-.of-way showing a sixty (60) foot setback from the center line of
Los Angeles Street9 conform with the existing setback of property to
the south as indicatedo~
At the conclusion of the d~scussion~ it was determined that the ap-
proach permit as outlined by the City Engineer~ could be processed by the
Engineering Division, and that action on City Planning Commission Resolution
No. 1053~ Series 1963-64, regarding the ~2 foot dedication from the center-
line of South Los Angeles Street, be withheld until such time as said resolu-
tion is a regular scheduled agenda item.
Mr. Keesee requested permission to utilize the remaining eight
feet of future right-of-way for the erection of a sign advertising his
business~
On the recommendation of the City Attorney, Mr. Keesee was advised
to file a sign application requesting permission for projection over the
property liner which will be considered by the City Council.
ORANGE COUNTY CASE NO. 710~ Orange County Case No. 710 (Sectional District Map
2-4-9, Exhibit J) proposing a change from the A~i, Agricultural district
to the 100-C1-10,000, Local Business Districti property located on the
east and west sldes of 'the Yorba Linda Freeway between the San~a Aha
7500
C,i,~,y Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINU;IE$ - February 11~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
Canyon Road and the Santa Aha River in the Santa Aha Canyon area.
Mr. Kreldt noted the location of 'the property and summarized
the review of said case by the City Plannln9 Commission at their meeting
held February 3, 1964, recommending certain observations be transmitted
to the Orange County Planning Commissiono
Discussion was held by the City Council and Mr. Kreidt, and at
the conclusion 'thereof, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by
Councilman Krein, MZo Kreldt wa~ instructed 'to forward a letter of recom-
mends±ion to the Orange County Planning Commission taking a positive approach
'to the applisatlon~ advising them of City of Anaheim policy concerning such
developments, in order to allow proponen%s an opportunity to conform with
City of Anahelm principles, as 'to the submission of plans if they so desire.
MOTION CARRIED.
VARIANCE NO. 1205: Mayor Coons reported on revised plans, submitted by Mrs.
Monica Lombardo.. for modification and expansion of existing apartments at
the northeast corner of Harbor Boulevard and Vermont Street, as granted
under Variance No. !205o He advlsed tha't the ex~sting garages are not
usable in 'their prer~ent location, and the plans are to convert the garage
area to living quaz'tezs, remove 'the present office wing and provide ad-
ditional parking in the area of the office~ and join the two existing
buildings on Lotj 1 and 2 together,
Pian~ were z'eviewed by the City Council and discussion held.
On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein,
plans presented were declared in conformity with the action 9ranting
Variance No. 1205, and said revised plans were approved this date, signed
by Mayor Coons~ and forwarded 'to the Building Department for their action.
MOTION CARRiED~
RECESS: Councilman Krein mo'red for a 15 minute recess. Councilman Chandler
seconded 'the motion. MOT[ON CARRiED~, (3:35
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called 'the meeting to order,, all members of the
City Council being present~
WORK ORDER NO. 1803: On the recommendations of 'the City Engineer, Councilman
Chandler moved that award of contract for 'the drilling of water well at
518 South Los Angeles Street~ Work Order NCo 1803, be deferred one week
(February 18, 1964~ to allow the Water Department to analyze bids and
review equipment which would be used~, Councilman Krein seconded the
motion MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO~ 64R-'76 ~. AWARD OF .JOB NO. 827~ On the recommendations of the
City Engineer~ Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-76 for adop-
tion, awarding construction of 'traffic signals at Broadway and Olive
Street~ Job No. 827~ to Steln¥ and Mitchel, ir~c., 'the low bidder in the
amount of $5~349.00o
Refer to Resolution Book~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF [HE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A
SEALED PROPOSAL AND A~ARDIN6 A CON[RACI TO THE LO~ESI RESPONSIBLE
BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT~ LABOR~ SERVIGES~ MATERIALS
AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTiLiTiES AND TRANSPORTATION~ INCLUDING POWER,
FUEL AND WATER~ AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND
COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: FURNISHING AND INSTALLING
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INIERSECIION OF BROADWAY
AND OLIVE STREET~ IN THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM~ ]'OB NO. 827. ($teiny and
Mitchel, ~n~:.,~
On r:oll call the foregoing ~.esolution was duly passed and
adopted by the following vote;
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chdndler~ Schutte~ Krein and Coons
~,IOE S: COUNC[LMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNC [LMEN: None
1501
City Ha.ll~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 11~ 1964, 1:30 P.Mo
The Mayor declared Resolution No, 64R-76 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-77 - AWARD OF JOB NO. 835: On the recommends±ions of the City
Engineer~ Councilman $chutte offered Resolution No. 64R-77 for adoption,
awarding construction of traffic signals for Ball Road and Walnut Street~
Job Nco 835~ to Eo D, Johnson and Company, the low bidder~ in the amount of
$5,295.00°
Refer. to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, gERVICES~ MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORIATiiON~ INCLUDING POWER~ FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM-
PROVEMENI: FURNiSHi~NG AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING
AT THE INTERSECT!ON OF BALL ROAD AND WALNUT STREET~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
JOB NO. 835~ (E~ D..Johnson and Co.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution wag duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN; None
The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 64R-77 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-78 .- AWARD OF JOB NOo 836~ On 'the recommendations of the
City Engineer~ Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 64R-78 for adop-
tion, awarding construction of traffic signals a't Ball Road and Euclid
Street, Job No~. 836~ to Dawn Electric: Service~ 'the low bidder, in the amount
of $6,887.00o
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE C!r¥' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT~ LABOR~ $ERViCES~ MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION? ~[NCLUDiNG POWER~ FUEL AND WATER~ AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM-
PROVEMENT: FURNiSHiNG AND INSTALLING TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING
AT THE INTERSECTION OF BALL ROAD AND EUCLID $TREET~ IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
JOB NOo 836~ (Dawn Elec'tric Service)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCiLMEN~ Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-78 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-79 - AWARD OF JOB NO. 838: On 'the recommendations of the
City £ngineer~ Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-79 for adoption,
awarding construction of 'the Dale Avenue Storm Drain improvement~ 3ob No.
838, to $tromberg, Inc~ in the amount of $36,356o53.
Refer to Resolution Book~
A RESOLU'[ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CirTY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT ]70 rHE LO~EST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR~ SERV][CES~ MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTAFiON~ INCLUDING POWER~ FUEL AND WATER~ AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IM-
PROVEMENT: CONSTRUCI'ION OF A 5TORM DRAIN IN DALE AVENUE FROM LINCOLN
AVENUE TO YALE AVENUE~ AND IN YALE AVENUE FROM DALE AVENUE TO COLGATE
AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHE~M~ .JOB NO. 8380 (Stromberg, Inc.)
7502
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 11~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote;
AYES; COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
NOES: COUNCILMEN; None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN~ None
Ihe Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-79 duly passed and adopted°
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-80: On 'the certification of the Director of Public Works
that Orange County Pipeline~ In¢~, has completed the construction of the
Santa Aha Canyon Road Sewer Improvement, 3ob No. 1265, in accordance with
plans and spe¢ifications, Councilman Schutte offered ResolUtion NO. 6aR-80
for adoption°
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT~ LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS
AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL
AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND
COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE SANTA ANA CANYON
ROAD SEWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM JEFFERSON STREET TO APPROXIMATELY 7,400 FEET
EAST OF JEFFERSON STREET, iN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM~ JOB NO. 1265. (Orange
County Pipeline Into)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-80 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R.-81: On the certification of the Director of Public Works
that Ralph de Leon Construction~ Inco, has completed the construction of
the Chalet Ave..--Euclid Street Sewer Improvement~ Job No. 1270, in accord-
ance with plans and speeiflcations~ Councilman Schutte offered Resolution
No. 64R.-81 for adoption~
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF lqHE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR~ SERVICES, MATERIALS
AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL
AND WATER~ AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND
COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT~ TO WIT: THE CHAI~T AVE.--
EUCLID ST. SEWER IMPROVEMENT IN CHALET AVE. FROM APPROX. 197' WEST OF
EUCLID SI. TO EUCLID ST., AND IN EUCLID ST. FROM APPROX. 25~ NORTH OF
CHALET AVE. TO APPROX. 145~ SOUTH OF CHALET AVE., IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
JOB NO. 12'70. ( Ralph de Leon Construction Inc.)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Chandler, Schutte~ Krein and Coons
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-81 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 6~R-82: On the certification of the Director of Public Works.
that Dzajkich & Alvarez Construction Go.~ has completed the construction
of the Red Gum Street-La Palms Avenue Sewer Improvement~ Job No. 1274~
in accordance with plans and specifications, Councilman Schutte offered
Resolution No. 64R-82 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
7503
City Hall~ Anaheim~ Callfornia~ ,- COUNCIL MINUTES - February i11 1~64~ 1:30 P,M.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
TIlE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT~ LABOR~ SERVICES, MATERIALS
AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER~ FUEL
AND WATER~ AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND
COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE RED GUM STREET-LA
PALMA AVENUE SEWER IMPROVEMENT~ PARTLY IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AND PARTLY
IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE~ JOB NO. 1274, (Dzajkich & Alvarez Construction Co,)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYKS: COUNCILMEN: Du't%on~ Chandler~ $chutte~ Krein and Coons
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 64R,-82 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-83: On the certifica'tion of the Director of Public Works,
that Orange County Pipeline, InCo~ has completed the construction of the
Katella Avenue Sewer Improvement~ Job No. 1276, in accordance with plans
and specification$~ Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 64R-83 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY' COUNCIL OF THE Cf'FY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, $ERVICE$~ MATERIALS
AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION iNCLUDING POWER, FUEL
AND WATER~ AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND
COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC iMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE KATELLA AVENUE
SEWER !MPROVEMENT~ FROM APPROXIMATELY 135 FEET EAST OF STATE COLLEGE
BOULEVARD ~O APPROXIMATELY 1000 FEET EAST OF STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD~ IN
THE CITY' OF ANAHEIM~ JOB NO~ 1276~ (Orange County Pipeline, Inc.)
On roll call 'the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the followin9 vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Du'tton~ Chandler~ $chutte~ Krein and Coons
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-83 duly passed and adopted.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 59-60-115 ,- ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: 'The City Attorney reported
on property described in Reclassification Nco 59-60-115, located at the north-
east corner of Chapman Avenue and Harbor Boulevard~ and submitted photos of
the hazardous conditions existing, consisting of violation of the Weed
Abatement Ordinance, and next-ct of three abandoned~ uncapped wells on the
property, which require back-~il'iing under the specifications of the Anaheim
Municipal Code° He advised that the petitioners are in proceedings under
Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy Act (Co Douglas Wik!e, Receiver)o
Mro Geisler further reported that as result of the recent wind-
storm~ the City of Anaheim ~leared debzi~ which had been blown from subject
property at the cost of $397°069 and he recommended that the existing weeds
be abated by the City and the cost thereof be assessed as a lien on the
property° Further, failure to keep property fre~ of w~eds is subject ~o
criminal penalty, and uncapped wells are not only a safety hazard~ but also
could contaminate the Oity:s water supply in the underground basino
Mr~ Mac Christensen, 12232 Chapman Avenue, Garden Grove, repre-
senting residents of a 'trailer park south of sub~ect property~ addressed
the Council advlsin9 that during the recent windstorm, two large mobil-
homes were so covered by large tumbleweeds and debris, 'that the residents
could not 9et out the door° He reported damages 'to paint on the trailers
as result of removin9 these large weeds, and requested the earliest pos-
sible weed abatement of subject property°
Mr° Lew Wheater, of Space Nco 118 in the trailer park, reported
~hat the weeds also were blown under trailers causing a fire hazardo
7504
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California- COUNCIL MINUTES - February i11 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
Mr, Edward Wright, Sanitation Inspector for the City of Anaheim,
reported on contacts made with 'the owner of the property, in August of
1963, in an attempt to abate 'the weed nuisance.
inspector Morgan of the Anaheim Fire Department, reported that
he has been working on the problem for approximately the same time as
~ir. Wrigh't~ and has received no answer from the property owner. He cited
the many complaints received by the Fire Department from the surrounding
property owners in both cities.
On 'the recommendations of the City Attorney, Councilman Chandler
moved that the City At'torney be authorized to send notice to the Trustee
and Referee in Bankruptcy, under the subject of Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy
Act, that unless some action to aba'te the excessive weed growth and correct
the abandoned well conditions on the property known as "Whitman Center, Inc."
described in Reclassification No. 59-60-115, is taken within the next seven
day period, the City Attorney is insiructed to file criminal proceedings.
Councilman button seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Chandler left 'the meeting, 4:15 P.M.
PURCHASE: The Assistant City Manager reported on informal bids received for
the purchase of copper water tubing for servlce connections as follows,
noting that two of the firm~ o~ered identical low bids~ and recommended
~[he acceptance of the bid submitted by Famllian Pipe and Supply Co.,
because of the one percent local sales tax preferential:
FamZlian Pipe & Supply Co., Anaheim
Howard Supply Co,, Los Angeles
Park.-$on~ Inc., Los Angeles
Republic Supply Co., Los Angeles
M. E, Gray Co., Los Angeles
Haldeman Pipe & Supply Co., Anaheim
Keenan Pipe & Supply Co.~ Anaheim
Bell Pipe & Supply Co~ Anaheim
Chas, A. Estey, Anaheim
$4,535.86
4,535.86
4,555.20
4,580.16
4,582.03
4,623.84
4,655.04
4,657.54
4,851.60
On the recommendations of the Assistant City Manager, Councilman
button moved that the low bid of Familian Pipe & Supply Co.~ Anaheim, Cali-
fornia, in the amount of $4,535.86, including tax, be accepted and purchase
authorized, Councilman $chutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
.D.EEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Krein offered Resolutions Nos. 64R-84 to 64R-91,
both inclusive, for adoption~
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R.~84: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY' OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT YOR DRAINAGE AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Herman Henry Bruns)
RE$OLUTION NO. 64R-8b: A RESOLU'riON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR EASEMEN[$ fOR ROAD AND ALLEY PURPOSES. ( S. V. ~unsaker
and Sons )
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-86: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(S. V. Hunsaker and Sons)
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-87: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTfNG A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(Jane H~ Bright)
7505
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - ?ebruary 11,~ 1964~ 1:30 PoMo
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-88~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPIING A GRANI DEED CONVEYING IO IHE CIIY OH ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(United California Bank)
RESOLUTION NOo 64R~89~, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES~ (J & C Develop-
ment Coo ]
RESOLUTION NOo 64R-90: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAMEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES° (Fred° Ro Isell
and Georglne Mo !sell)
RESOLUTION NOo 64R-91~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPIING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENI FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC I~ILIIY pURpoSES.
(C.S. Baum~tark & Aubine E~ gaums~ark, and Mancil Fo and Henrietta Mae
Bell)
On roll call 'the foregoing resolutions were duly passed and
adopted by the following vote:
AYES~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Schut%e, Krein and Coons
NOES~ COUNCILMEN~ None
ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: None
TEMPORARILY ABSENI: COUNCILMAN~ Chandler
The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos° 64R-84 to 64R-91, both
inclusive, duly passed and adopted°
Councilman Chandler returned, 4~20 PoMo
RESOLUTION NOo 64R-92~ Councilman Schutte offered Resolution Noo 64R-92 for
adopt~.Ono
Refer to Resolution Book o
A RESOLUT.[ON OF THE CI'~Y COUNCIL OF 'THE CiiTY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A
GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR
AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES° (Jack Co Dutton and
Dorothy Go Dutton)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and
adopted by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Schutte, Krein and Coons
NOES.~ COUNCILMEN.~ None
ABSENT ~ COUNCILMEN ~ None
ABSTAINED: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler
The Mayor declared Resolution No o 64R~92 duly passed and adopted~
RESOLUTION N0~ 64R-93oo Councilman Krein offered Resolution Noo 64R-93 for
adoption°
Refer to Resolution Booko
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT WITH
REFERENCE TO THE iNSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF A LIGHTING SYSTEM ON
TENNIS COURTS AT LOARA HIGH $CHOOL~
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and
adopted by the following vote~
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler~ Schutte~ Krein and Coons
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
7~06
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUIES - February 11~ 1964~ 1530
The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 64R-93 duly passed and adopted°
RESOLUTION NO~ 64R-94~ Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Noo 64R-94 for
adoptions,
Refer 'to Resolution Booko
A RESOLUIION OF IHE CIIY COUNCIL OF THE CIIY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION
NOo 4274 BY PROVIDING FOR AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE CITY AND CUSTOMERS WHERE
NEW ADDITIONAL PERMANEMr LOADS ARE REQUESTED~ (City Electrical Facilities)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following votes
AYESt COUNCILMEN~ Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
NOES .~ COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT; COUNCILMEN~ None
The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 64R-94 duly passed and adoptedo
RELINQUISHMENI - HIGHWAY RIGHY-OF-WAY~ Certified copy of Resolution No. R-239
of the California HighwaY Commission~ relinquishing a portion of Manchester
Avenue and Or.angewood Avenue to the City of Anaheim (Relinquishment
Noo 238-ViI-ORA-174-ANA~ Ne~ VZi-ORA-5)~ was ordered received and filed
by motion by Councilman Schutte, ;;econded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED.
CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on
motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler:
a. Letter from ,John Waugen of 2103 Catalpa Avenue commending the Anaheim
~ire Department and particularly Station 2 on Brookhurst Street.
bo Letter from Bentley H. Badjett of 800 West Wilhelmina Avenue, commending
the Anaheim City Council for 'their decision in connection with the
monorail proposalo
c. Minutes of the Orange County Board of Supervisors meeting of January
28, 1964, regarding the request of the City of Anaheim for funding
and construction of a portion of 'the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg
Channel E-12.
d. Notice amending route of applic'~tion of Stanley "G" Alexander for
cert:~fica'te of oubli~z convenience and necessity to operate passenqer
service between Dlsneyland Hotel and points and places in Orange County
hearinq before the Public Utilities Commission.
MOT[ON CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 1969: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1969 for final
reading°
Refer to Ordinance Book~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONINGo (63-64-51 - Rtl)
After hearing read in full the 'title of Ordinance No. 1969
and having knowledge of 'the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved
the reading in full of said ordinance be waived° Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following 'vote:
AYES~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENY~ COUNCILMEN: None
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1969 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1970: Councilman Coons offered Ordinance No. 1970 for final
reading°
Refer to Ordinance Book.
7507
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California ,- COUNCIL MINUTES - February 11~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18, CHAPTER 18.08 -
DEFINIIIONS, OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE. (A~%o~bile Service Stations)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1970
and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved
the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
On roll call the foregoing ordinance was duly passed and adopted
by the following votes
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENI.~ COUNCILMEN; None
Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1970 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1971: Councilman Chandler o{{ered Ordinance Nee 1971 for first
readingo
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63,-64-47 - R-3)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1971
and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved
the reading in full of said ordinance be waived~ Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion~ MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 1972: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1972 for first
reading°
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING 'tITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-63
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance Nee 1972
~ad having knowledge of 'the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved
the reading in full of said ordinance be waived~ Councilman Dutton
seconded the motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIEDo
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATIONS: The following applications for Alcoholic
Beverage Licenses were presented by the Assistant City Manager to the City
Council for their information~
a. New Off-Sale Beer and Wine license by Lawrence A. and Mary H. Brown,
for Larry Brown's Market, 910 South Euclid Street, C-1 Zone.
b. New On-Sale Beer license by Del~Arwin, Inc~, for unnamed business at
401 South Lemon Street, C-2 Zone.
c. Person to Person transfer of On-Sale Beer license by Joseph J. Viani
for Duffer's inn, 113 North Magnolia Avenue, C-2 Zoneo
d. New On-Sale Beer license by Rachel Fernandez Campos of the Las Maracas,
120 East Lincoln Avenue, C-2 Zone.
No Council action was taken of the foregoing applications.
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application submitted by Les%er
Clayton Kirk for New On-Sale Beer license for unnamed business on 1077
North Harbor Boulevard, C-2 Zone, was presented by Mr. Davis to the City
Council for their informatlon,
On motion By Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler,
the City A~(ornev was authorized to file protest on behalf of the City of
Anaheim with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against said application,
due ~o (he proper(y~s close proximity to La Palma Park. MOTION CARRIED.
75O8
City Mall~ Anaheim~ Callfoznia - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 11~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M,
RESOLUTION NO, 64R-95: On report and recommendation of the Director of Public
Works, Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 64R-95 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 63R-652 RELATTNG TO FEES TO BE CHARGED AT THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL GOLF
COURSE. (Student golf play ,- Webster~ Magnolia~ Loara and Savanna High
Schools)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-95 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-96: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-96 for
adoption,
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CONFIRMING THE
REPORI OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS; ASCERTAINING AND DETERMINING
/HE COSTS OF REMOVAL OF WEEDS, RUBBISH, AND RANK GROWTH FROM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM; DIRECTING THAT THE CITY DEMAND
PAYMENI OF SUCH COSTS~ AND ORDERING THAT THE COST OF SUCH REMOVAL BE
CERTIFIED TO THE ORANGE COUNTY AUDITOR AS A LIEN ON SAID REAL PROPERTY.
(A, Po No. 082,-,270-39)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adQpted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
NOE$~ COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCtLMENx None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-96 duly passed and adopted.
OUTDOOR ADVERTISING AND BILLBOARD SIGNS: On motion by Councilman Krein~ seconded
by Councilman Dutton~ the City Attorney was authorized to appear at the
public hearing concernin9 regulation of outdoor advertising and billboard
signs by the State of California, to be held before the Natural Resources
Subcommittee of the Assembly Interim Committee on Natural Resources~ Planning
and Public Works, on February 24 and 25, 1964, and to convey the City of
Anaheim support of Assembly Bill No. 2245 and Senate Bill No. 26 of the
State of California. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Chandler left the meeting, 4~50 P.M.
VARIANCE 1613 ~- SUBMISSION OF PLOT PLAN: Plot Plan submitted for property des-
cribed in Variance No~ 1613~ located at 'the northwest corner of Broadway
and Fahrion Place, was reviewed by the City Council; and in accordance
with Council Policy No. 516 said plot plan was referred to the City
torney and 'the Architectural Control Board for determination as to con-
formance as nearly a:~ po~:~ble with today's R~3 requirements.
PROPOSED ORDINANCE ~, PAWN BROKERS AND SECOND-HAND DEALERS: At the request of
Mayor Coons the City Attorney briefly explained the progress on a draft
of the propo~ed ordinance relating [o 9oods received and sold by pawn
brokers and second.:hand dealert:.~
PROPOSED SIGN ORDINANCE: Zonlng Coor. dinator Martin Kreidt, reported that the
draft of the proposed sign ordinance has been reviewed by the Planning
Staff, adjusted modificattons have been added, and the draft has been
forwarded [o '[he Ci±y At~orney~ office for re;.drafting and presentation
to 'the C:~.ty Council.
7S09
Git.y Uall~ Anaheim~ California ,- COUNCIL MINUTES - February 11~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
RECESS; Councilman Krein moved to recess to 7:00 o~clock P.M. Councilman
Schutte seconded the motlon~ MOTION CARRIED. (4;55 P.M~)
AFTE. R....REC.ESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order.
PRESENT:
ABSENT~
PRESENT;
COUNCILMEN; Dutton, Chandler, $chutte, Krein and Goons.
COUNCILMEN: None.
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER; Robert Davis.
CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler.
DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Aloha M. Fattens.
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS: Thornton E. Piersall.
GIIY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox.
20NiNG COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt.
.INVOCATION: Pastor Kluck, of the Zion Lutheran Church, gave the invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Coons led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLA$$IFICAIiON NO. 63-64-71 AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 1:
Submitted by Melvin F., Arthur E~, Fred and Alma Bentjen, Owner, LeRoy Rose,
Architect, Agent, requesting a change of zone from R-O to R-o and R-3 on
property briefly described as an L-sha~ed parcel of land coverin9 approximately
21 acres, having frontages of 1~076 feet on north side of Uestmont Drive,
567 feet on the south side of North Street; the eastern boundary of salO pro-
perry being approximately 130 feet west of Dwyer Drive, as follows:
Portion A =~ Fronting on the north side of Westmont Drive and having
a depth of 111 feet -. Requested zoning~ R-O one-family suburban zone.
Portion B ~ The remainder of the above described property, ex%ending
to North Street- Requested zoning, R~3~ multiple-family residential zone.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No.
1018, Series 1963-64~ recommended said petition for reclassification be
denied°
GENERAL PLAN A~ENDMENT NO, 1: The City Planning Commission pur-
suant to their Resolution No. 1025~ Serles 1963-6~ recommended that General
Plan Amendment No. 1 be disapproved~,
TENTATIVE MAP - TRACT NO. 5427; De'veloper~ Orco Building and
Development InCo~ said tract was filed in conjunction with Reclassification
No. 63-64-71~ and is proposed for subdivision into 10 R-O, one-family
suburban, and 58 R-3, multiple-family residential, lots.
The City Planning Commission at their meeting held January 6, 1964,
denied said tentative ma~Tract No. 5~2'7, based on the fact 'that Reclassifica-
tion No. 63-6~-'71 on subject property had been recommended for denial as an
incompatible us~ in the area.
Numerous lettex~o of pr. crest and petition of opposition containing
185 signatures of owner~ of ~-eal property io~ated within one half mile radius
of subject property, reque~ting ~aid rezoning and tentative 'tract map be denied,
was submitted to the City Counc~il~
Mr. Martin Kreidt noted the location of subject property and existing
zonin9 and uses of property in the im~nediate area, and summarized the evidence
submitted at the hearing before the City Planning Commission~ noting that the
Commission did dis~guss ~tatement~ that had been made by the agent relative %o
economics and land price, but the Commission also indicated that this factor
could not be a consideration of the Commission as land use ~as their prime
considera'tion. ~Vith reference to the oppo~sition~ M~. Kreidt noted that the
owners of property -~n the ~c~nity of subject property were of ~the opinion
~ha± the establishment of R-9 ~ould be an encroachment of multiple-family
development into a ba~i~ally !~lngle-family residential ~uburban area, which
would be very detrimental to their exi~ting property values.
7510
~itv Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 11~ 1964~ 1:30 P.~
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 1~ An exhibit showing General Plan
Amendment No. 1 was placed on the west wall of the Gouncil Ghambers and
Mr. Kreidt explained that the intent of said exhibit was to indicate how
the General Plan should be amended if subject reclassification was approved,
to properly reflect such a zoning change and its effect upgn adjacent pro-
perties and other existing multiple family zoning in the area.
The Mayor asked if the applicant was present and wished to
address the Council~
Mr~ LeRoy Rose~ Architect for the proposed project and represent-
ing 'the owners addressed the Council, advlsin9 that after the City Planning
Commission ~:ecommended denial~ the developers prepared a project that would
be the most feasible development with the least R-3, considerinq also
whether the City wanted the land developed now or held vacant for a future
R-O developmento
Mx~. Rose submitted a copy of the map prepared by the City
Planning Department in 1954 in connection with Reclassification No,D3-D4-27~
indlcatln9 that the propez'tiea between West and Euclid Streets and between
La Palma and Manchester Avenues were either zoned R-i~ R-O or R-O0, and the
R-O0 appeared to be a buffer zone between the R-1 and R-O property. But
since that date th~ golf course property has been zoned from R-O to R-3;
the school baa been erected; 'the Broadway Center parking lot and the church
have been es'tablfshed on R-O propez~ty~ and the property south of the church
has been zoned from R-O to R-3.
Ihat if the Coun.:::il chooses to deny the requested application~
but if they also decide to have the property developed at this time, the
developers now have a new plan of de'velopment to submit to the City Plan-
ning Commission and City Council, as follows:
(Mx o Rose held up a large colored plan of the area for the
audience to view)
Along the south boundary of subject property - R-O Zoning (11R-O
lots)
North and 'to the east adjacent to present R-O zone R-1 single-
,tory ',33 R-1 lots)
Immediately west of 'the proposed R-1 Zoning - R-3 single-stOryo
lhe remaindez of the property- R-3 two-story (total of 110 R-3
units)
That as a result of the:z economic research the developers feel they
can economically p~oduce this new proposed development at the present buying
price and thereby also create a transition between the Broadway Center park-
ing lot and the ~school p~'ope~ty, and 'the existing R-0 residences.
in answer to CouncilVs questions~ Mr. Rose advised the R-1 lots
would be 7200 square foot lots and they would comply with the minimum R-O
house-size requirements if the City requested them to do so.
In answer, to Councilman Dutton~s question regarding R-O develop-
ment, Mm. Rose advised that at 'the present asking price, the developer can
not produce a complete R-O development and make a profit.
Mr. Rose again advised 'that what the developers are requesting is
that if 'the city would consider this proposed new plan, they will withdraw
the R-3 plan before 'the Council submitted with Reclassification No. 63-64-71~
and resubmit to the City Planning Commissiono
The Mayor asked if anyone wlshed to speak in favor of subject
application° There was no responseo
The Mayor asked if the opposition had a spokesman who desired to
address the Council.
Mro Jack W~ Flammer~ 633 North Dwyer Drive, spoke in protest as
a homeowner against the original plan as p~'oposed~ as this is a fine residen-
7511
City Hall~ Anahelm~ California - COUNCI~ MINUTES - February 11~ 19647 1:30 P.M.
rial area which should not be encroached upon by multiple dwellings along West-
mont~ He was of the opinion that this vacant R-0 acreage should be reserved
for citizens coming to Anahelm to establish bu~ine~:ses and to establish fine
residenceg~ He urged the Council to fully consider the many lett6rs~ w{res
and petitions of pro'test that have been recelved~
Dr. Lawrence Welnstein, 1239 Dwyer Drive, recalled the many
times that residents of the area have been before the City Council with
reference to 'the same situation° That they are quite interested in pre-
serving the residential area as it is and believe the residents would fine
it necessary to move to areas in other cities if they found it becoming
saturated with multiple units°
Mr o Lew Overholt Jro, 651Dwyer Drive, addressed the Council in
opposition advising the back portion of his property joins on the 22 acres
in question~ and also recalled the many times he had been before the Com-
mission and Council~ He was of the opinion that 'the request of Mr. Rose
this evening 'to submit new plans would only further delay the entire matter
and cause more inconvenience to the resldent~ of the area°
At Mr. Overholt~s request for an indication of those present in
opposition to subject reclassification, a majority of the audience stood.
Mro Overholt was of the opinion that 'the principal argument of
the petitioner~ is tha-t this property is ~too valuable for R-0 residential
and that the petitioner~ request this evenin9 'to submit a new plan which
none of the residents in the area had seen before~ was a further attempt
to delay and convince the parties concerned that this alreage is too
valuable to develop as R-O~
That many of the residents in this area have made substantial
investments in their home~ ranging from $40~000~00 'to $85~000.00 in the
Westmont area~ with many of 'the homeowners purchasing within the past
year~ That to impose upon them an R-3 development because there is a
parking lot on the othe~ side of thi~ vacant iand~ is unfounded because
the parking lot was designed to be compatible with single family residences;
to use the school a(~ 'the basi~ for their z. equest is unreasonable because
schools are certalni¥ compatible with single family residential; and he
was of the opinion that the ~small cluste~ of apartments that presently exist
on the north side of North Street do not affect the Wes'tmont area.
Mro Ove~holt urged that the CouncJi deny 'the applicant's re-
quest for R-3 and that the R-0 zonlng be preserved°
Mr. Flammer requested 'that the Council deny the applicant's
request to resubmit the matter to the City Planning Commission.
Mayor Coons declared the hearing closed~
Discussion was held by the City Council and it was felt that
the law of economics would determine the 'time of development in an orderly
manner, and Mayor Coons noted that very recently the area along Park Avenue
was developed under R-O standards without any apparent difficulty.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-97: At the conclusion of the discussion Councilman Krein
offered Resolution No. 64R~9'7 for adoption upholding the recommendation of
the City Planning Commission and denying Reclassification Application No.
63-64-71, and further denying the applicants request for a referral of the
alternate plan back 'to 'the City Planning Commission.
Refer 'to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN
AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (63-6~-71)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
7512
City Hall~ Anaheim~ Gellfornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 11, 1964~ 1530
AYES: COUNCILMEN: button, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
NOE$~ COUNCILMEN~ None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor. declared Resolution Noo 64R-97 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-9~[ Councilman K~ein offered Resolution No. 64R-98 for
adoption upholding the recommendations of the City Plannln9 Commission that
General Plan Amendment No~ 1 be disapproved.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING PROPOSED
AMENDMENT NOo 1 TO THE GENERAL PLAN.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
A~YES: COUNCILMEN: button, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
NOES: COUNCILMEN; None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 64R-98 duly passed and adopted.
TENTATIVE MAP TRACT NOo 5427o~ Councilman Chandler moved that Tentative
Map Tract No~ 5427 be denied~ Councilman $chutte seconded the motion.
MOT I ON CARR !ED o
PUBLIC HEARINGS - RECLASSIFiCATiON NO. 63-64-68 AND VARIANCE NO. 1616:
RECLASSiFiCATiON NO. 63-64-68~ Submitted by Anaheim Investment Company,
owner, Ronald W.~ Caspers, authorized agent, requestin9 change of zone
from R-1 and C-1 to C-.O, on property located at 530, 536, 540~ 550 and 554
Fairhaven Street and 555 and 551 North Euclid Street (property havin9 front-
ages on the ea~t side of Fairhaven Street, west side of Euclid Street, and
south side of Cre~cent Avenue -. Tract No. 1591).
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 1019,
Series 1963-6~ ~ecommended sald reclassification to C-O %o construct an
addition 'to an existing office building, be approved, subject to the following
condition~i~:
le
2~
e
o
o
Thai 'the completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent
upon 'the granting of a varianceo
That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land 32 feet in width, from the center line of the street,
along Crescent Avenue, for street widening purposes.
That Condition No. 2~ above mentioned, shall be complied with within
a period of 180 days f~om date hereof, or such further time as the
City Council may grant~
That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications; of file with the City of Anaheim, marked
~"Exhibit No~s~ 1 thru 6~'~, and in accordance with all provisions of the
C-O~ Commercial Office, Zone.
Thai access rights to Fairhaven Street shall be dedicated to the City
of Anaheim,
VARIANCE NO. 1616: Submitted by Keystone Savings and Loan Association and
Anaheim Investment Company~ recorded owner, Ronald W. Caspers, authorized
agent, requestin9 waiver of the required 10-foot building setback and the
structural helght limitation to permit the expansion (3 stories) of the
Keystone Savings and Loan Association building, on property described in
Reclassification Application No~ 63-64-68~
the City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 1020~
$erie~ 1963-64~ granted subject variance subjec~ ~o the following condi-
tions~
7513
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 117 1964~ 1~30 P.M.
1. Ihat the sidewalks shall be repaired along Yairhaven Street, Crescent
Avenue and £uclid S'treet~ as required by the City Enqineer and in ac-
cordance with ~tandard plans and specifications on file in the office
of the City Engineer prior to final building inspection.
2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to
final building inspection°
3. That this variance is granted subject to 'the completion of Reclassifica-
tion No. 63-64-68~
4. That a 36-inch decorative masonry wall set back 3-feet shall be construct-
ed along the Crescent Avenue frontage of subject property, th&t §aid
3-foot strip of land between the sidewalk and wall shall be landscaped
in accordance with a plan submitted to and subject to the approval of
the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance and ~hat said landscaping
be installed prior 'to final building inspection°
5. That a 6-foot decorative masonry wall~ set back 3-feet~ shall be construct-
ed along the Fairhaven Street frontage of subject property, said wall
to be stepped down to 36 inches within 15 feet of the southerly right-
of-way line of Crescen't Avenue, that said 3-foot strip of land between
the sidewalk and wall shall be landscaped in accordance with a plan
submitted to and subject 'to the approval of the Superintendent of
Parkway Maintenance, and that said landscaping be installed prior
to final buildin9 inspection.
6. That the plantin9 areas in the parking lot shall be landscaped in
accordance with a plan submitted to and subject to the approval of
the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance and said landscaping be
installed prior to final buildin9 inspectiono
7. That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the southerly
property lines where adjacent to single family residential zoned
propert¥~ prior to final building inspect~on~
8. That tree wells shall be provided at approximate 60-foot intervals
in the Yairhaven Street and Crescent Avenue Parkways abutting subject
property that plans for said 'tree wells and the planting of trees
therein~ shall be submitted 'to and approved by the Superintendent of
Parkway Maintenance; and said 'tree wells shall be planted with trees
prior to final buildin9 inspectiono
9. That the existing driveways shall be removed and/or replaced with
standard .;urbs and 9uttsrs, along Fairhaven Drive~ as required by
the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifi-
cations on file in the office of the City Engineer~ prior to final
buildin9 inspec'tion~
Mr. Martln Kreidt read the evidence submitted at the City
Planning Commission hearing~ and outlined 'the location of subject pro-
perty, being 'the north 56.58 feet of Lot No. 55, and Lots Nos. 56, 57,
58, 59, 60, 61~ 63~ 64 and 65 of Tract No. 1591; that the five lots front-
ing Euclid Street are presently ~laasified in the C-1 Zone and on the other
side of the alley f~-onting Fairhaven Street are the five R-1 lots, the
third R-1 lot south of Crescent Avenue not being a part of subject re-
classification.
The Mayor asked if the applicant was present and wished to
address the Council°
Mr~ Caspers, Authorized Agen't, addressed the Council briefly
explaining the two-level building, one being underground, of the existing
Keystone facility~ But at the time of their relocation from down-town
Anaheim two years ago, they had approximately ten million in assets and
fifteen employees~ and 'today they have thirty,-two million in assets ~nd
thirty-five employees. He wa~ of 'the opinion the only way to expand to
meet their apparent need for more space, was by adding additional stories,
which is becomin9 the trend throughout Southern California today. That
the proposed additional floors will house the data processing equipment
and additional personnel and the lots frontin9 Fairhaven Street~ which
they have purchased one by one, will be used for parking and be completely
enclosed by a 6-foot wall with 'the only access being from the alley~ or
through the existing parking lots on Euclid Street°
7514
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February i11 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
~'. Caspers advised they had originally hoped to be able to
purchase the five lots directly behind the Hu¢lid Street frontage, however~
as they were unable to acquire the third lot from Crescent Avenue~ they
purchased the slxth lot~which will be used for employee parking only.
That the purchase price of said lots ranged from $15~000.00 to $18,000.00
for the corner lot on Crescent Avenue. He advised they made an offer of
$20,000~00 to the owner of the third lo't with at'tractive interest rate
financing on the purchase of a new home, but were unable to negotiate
successfully~ however~ the offer still remalns standing°
In answer to Council?s questions, Mr. Caspers advised there will
be no ingress or egress from Fairhaven Street and they have requested that
the wall on Crescent Avenue be reduced in height so as not to create a
traffic hazard°
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor of
subject application, there was no response.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to speak in opposition°
Mro Holmes~ 544 North Fairhaven Street, requested the matter
be continued until his Attorney~ Mr, Dannemeyer, was present.
The Mayor asked :if anyone else wished to speak in opposition.
Mr, Frank Pohlman, 513 North Fairhaven Street, was of the opinion
that most of the residents on the west side of Fairhaven would not object
to 'the block wall if it was landscaped properly~ however~ as the remaining
lots on the east side of Fairhaven will probably be developed a lot at a
time, they also feel that a block wall here and there with a house in
between, would make a very unattractive street~
Councilman Chandler asked Mr. Pohlman if he felt it would be of
any value 'to all the people in the area~ regardless of the action on
subject application, to have a plan study made of this residential tract
from Crescent Avenue south and from Euclid Street west~ with the thought
of making commercial use of the entire area.
Mr~ Pohlman replied he could not speak for anyone else, but
he enjoyed the nelghborhood~ liked the accessibility to the Freeway
because he drove 'to work on it every day~ and his wife liked the
convenience of the shopping area; he felt that such a study for the
area east of Fairhaven would be fine~ if property owners could get
together°
Mr. Dannemeyer~ Attorney ~epresenting Mr° Holmes, apologized
for being l~te for the hea~ingo He stated his client~ Mr, Holmes~ was
the owner of Loz No. 62 f~onting on Fairhaven Street, and was under no
duty to sell to the appli.:anto That he purchased this R-1 property when
it was first developed and like~ livin9 there and has teen-age children
who do not w?~sh to change from their p~esent high-school°
Mro Dannemeyer explained that an additional factor is the deed
restrictions which were placed on the residential tract as well as those
lots fronting Fairhaven~ in January, 1954~ containing the provision that
no building site on said property shall be used for any purpose o~her than
single-family resident purpose~ and the designation R-1 as stipulated in
the zoning ordinances of the City of Anaheim° As a matter of interpretation,
Mr. Dannemeyer submitted that [he reference to the phrase~ "and the designa-
tion R-1 as stipulated in zoning ordinances" was merely a reference to what
uses are permitted in 'that R-1 zone and does not mean that a political body
such as the City Council can in i'ts wisdom, change the deed restrictions;
however, the Council can change what you can do in an R-1 zone under these
deed restrictions and tha't would change the character of 'the use of the R-1
property, Further~ that as long as the ordinances of the City of Anaheim
say that a use in an R-1 zone i~ for ~ingle-family residential purposes,
that this is all that the property can be used for° That if the Council
chooses to grant subject request fo~ rezoning, they would, in effect, be
putting his client to an election as he most 'then take whatever the Offeror
7515
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 11~ 1964~ 1;30 P,Mo
will in his magnanimity give, or he must put up hi5 dollars and go to court
to protect a contract right placed on his property in 1954 by deed reslrlc-
tions which can nof in any way be altered by an act of the Council. By the
same token~ the Council is not bound by what the restrictions say~ as fhey
have the political ability to rezone this property, but any such action can
not affect the sta'tus of the deed restrictions as now recorded. He was of
the opinion that there was a serious legal question as to whether or not
the applicant could proceed with his proposed use of the property even if
the Council did elect to follow the recommenda~tions of the City Planning
Commission.
Mr~ Dannemeyer referred to the Anaheim Municipal Code, and was
of the opinion that so far as th~ zonia9 ':h~nae w~; ;on.;erned~ ~hat [he
applicant's request to expand his activities 6y adding to the height of
his building, thereby creating a need ~or more parking~ does not demonstrate
a public necessity and convenience to preserve the general welfare of this
area and the people of the city, but rather becomes a matter of priva'te
necessity. Also the same crlterla exlsts with respect to the variance, as
this parcel is not of odd '~haped ~zze ~i~at need:~ to seek relief from the
application of lawo He was of the opinion there was nothing unusual about
subject property, however, if the application is granted, an odd shaped'
parcel will be created, as Mr. Ho/m~' re~de~-,t~al tot will become an island
surrounded on three sides by C-O.
Mr o Dannemeyer submitted that a reasonable alternative would be
to grant 'the applicant his requested variance from the height requirements,
however let him provide basement parking rather than interfering with the
peace and quiet of his client and his neighbors by rezoning the R-1 lots
to C-O,
Councilman Dutton asked Mr. Dannemeyer if either he or his client
had offered to sell since January 6~ for more than the $20,000.00 offered.
Mr. Dannemeyer replied that they have negotiated, but he was
uncertain whether there could be a mutual agreement because his client is
not convinced that he wants to move~ He further stated than he has advised
his client that the deed restrictions will prevent 'the applicant from enjoying
the benefits they are requesting~ if someone seeks to pursue 'the matter.
Councilman Chandler stated it was his understanding regarding
deed restrictions that they stand as a contractual matte~ until a court
of equity determines that 'there has been a change in the neighborhood and
the surrounding area so that~twould no longer be practical to enforce the
deed restrictions° Ihe p~inciple that was outlined about the protection of
deed restrictions is a good thing for 'the person who wants to enforce the
restrictions regardless of the principle of equity~ but how can an individual
test the efficacy of the deed restrictions under present conditions without
giving him the political action rezoning his property so he can show that
the development will be permitted if the determination is made.
Mr, Dannemeyer felt that if these people seek 'to visit discomforts
and inconvenience upon a private resident and lot owner in view of these deed
restrictions~ that they have a very clear remedy° The applicant owns the
proper'ty on each side of Mr~ Holmes~ and therefor~ could under the existing
law file a petition in the courts to remove the restriction and then present
their evidence to determine if there has been a change in circumstancms that
would justify a lifting of the deed restrictions. As it is now~ if the ap-
plication is granted~ Mr. Holmes would have to go to court to do the same
thing in order to protect his property. Than in his opinion, if the applicant
feels the circumstances have changed, they should be the individuals who present
the matter to 'the court ~or the purpose of having the deed restrictions lifted.
Councilman Chandler felt that the deed restrictions could work for
and against both parties: that the Council would not be unfair to either party
by not paying attention to the deed restrlctlons~
Mr o Dannemeyer stated he recognized that the Council had the right
to rezone the property regardless of ~he deed restrictions~ but that he had
been informed that it has sometimes been expressed that the Council will not
7516
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES- February 11~ 1964~ 1:30 P,M,
willingly in the .absence of extraordinary circumstances place its citizens
to the burden of defending a deed restriction which he enjoys on his pro-
perty,
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council.
Peter Nozero, 517 Fairhaven Street, addressed the Council in op-
position to the applicant°s request for rezoning which would leave one
R-1 lot :isolated. He felt that if subject applicafion was granted, that
the remainder of the homeowners could be subjected to the same isolation
probl~m~ HE r~ferred fo fhe recommendation made at the City Planning
Commission hearing 'that a study be made of this area, and requested that
action b~ withheld until such ~ u~se .~tudy is presented, particularly
as to 'the east side of Fairhaven Street.
in rebuttal, Mr~ Caspers eta'ted they definitely felt that there
has been a tremendous conversion and change in the nature of the neighbor-
hood since 'the homes were originally built, with the coming of the Broad-
way-Robinson Shopping Center~ the high-rise Galifornia Federal Building~
and the various shopping areas~ that this was certainly their opinion or
they would not be willing to pay $68,000~00 an acre (four houses to an
acre) for fhe purpose of parking cars~
Mro Casper~ further advised that their proposed wall will be
decorative in any way de.~ired to zemo~e the monotony o~ a 6-foot wall~ and
still provide Mro Holmes his privacy~ That all of the lights in the park-
ing lots will be of the low mu~h~oom type, and the telephone-utilities will
probably be placed undezg~ound~ He :~tated that he always felt that their
business ~ ~ le~t qua ~-pubi :_ ~ a:~ any bank or ~avings and loan is a
public buslness dealing with people's moneyo
'The Mayor asked if anyone else had anything new or additional to
offer, there being no response, declared the hearing closed.
Discussion was held by the City Council, and Councilman Chandler
asked Mr, Casper$ if any offer to sell had been made by Mr. Holmes.
~h. Caspers replied that counsel for Mr. Holmes met with his
Attorney, and he understood the:re wa~ a higher figure mentioned.
RESOLUTIONS: Counc~iman 5handier was of the opinion the extension of the
parking lot in the manne~ proposed by ~the applicant would not necessarily
be a detriment to the nelgnborhood~ as at the time the C~I lots on Euclid
S'treet are developed~ the remaining R-1 lot~ on Fai~haven will also pro-
bably be considered for parking purposes° Councilman Chandler offered
resolution~ upholding the a.~',tlon of 'the City Planning Commission and
granting Reclassification No~ 63-6~-68 and Variance No. 1616 subject to
the recommendations of the City Planning Commission~
Coun::~lman Schut'te felt the change in the area was recognized
when the lo'tr~ along Euclid were never developed as homes by the sub-
divider; regarding 'the re:~iden%ial lot~ on Fairhaven, he questioned
'the read, on for the or:ig~nal deed re~'L~"~,:tion~ if they do not continue
to serve a purpo:~e~
Mayor Coons felt the situa'tion would be considered differently
by the proper'ty owner:; in the entire tract if the City Plannin9 Commission
held a study and hearing~ .zegardzn9 an intent to reclassify the tier
of lots facing Fairhaven Street from Crescent Avenue to Westmont Street,
to the C.-0 zone. He noted that at 'the City Planning Commission only four
persons appeared in opposition, ~:~o ~uch ~tudy might provide a satisfactory
solution,~
Mayor Coons called for roll call of the foregoing resolutions:
AYES:
NOES:
COUNCILMEN: Du~t'ton and Chandler
COUNCILMEN~ Schutte and Krein
7517
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES- february 11~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
Councilman Krein requested that a study of the area be made by
the City Planning Commission~
Mayor Coons asked if the Council would consider tabling their
action, pending the results of subject study°
Martin Kreidt advised that such a study has been commenced and
will be before the Commission on March 2~ 1964.
Councilman Chandler stated he dld not wish to withdraw his
resolutions, but in 'the light of Mr, Kreidt~s infozmation~ he asked
Caspers if he desired a continuance to allow for the result~ of a study
of the area between Crescent Avenue and Westmont Street~ and Euclid and
Fairhaven Streets°
Mr, Caspers replied he would rather have the application con-
tinued than have it denied,
Mro Dannene'yer, in answer to Councilman Chandler's quegtion,
stated he could only speak for his client)'that he felt the evidence has
been submitted and they oppose any continuance.
Two gentlemen who addressed the Council in opposition, stated
from the audience they were in favor- of a continuance,
Mayor Coons then ab~tained from vo'ting on the resolutions,
declaring a tie vote°
It was moved by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman
Schutte zhat said resolutions be tabled for further study~ to be again
considered on March 10th~ 1964, at 7~00 o~.~lo{:k P.M, MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-67 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 523:
Submitted by Broadway-Hale S'tores~ Incorporated, requesting a change of zone
from R-A to C~2 to permit 'the es'tablishment of a service station on a trian-
gular ~;haped pa~..el of prope~ty~ having f~'ontage~ on the sgutherly, side of
Wilshire Avenue~ east side of Loafs Street and the northerly side of the
Santa Aha Freeway off~rampo
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 1021,
Series~ 1963-64~ recommended said re¢lassifica'tion be approved subject to the
following condition:
1. That the comple[ion of 'the reclassification proceedings is contingent
upon the granting of a conditional use permito
The City Planning Commission pursuant 'to their Resolution No. 1022,
Series 1963-647 9ranted said conditional use permit 'to establish a service
station subject to the following conditions~
1. That this <:onditional use permit is granted subject to the completion of
Reclassification No. 63-64-67.
2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file in the offi~e of the Director of Publlc ~orks~ prior to
final building inspection°
3, That sidewalks shall be installed along Wilshire Avenue as required by
the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications
on file in the office of 'the City Engineer prior to final building inspection.
4o That adequate pedestrian protection shall be provided at the existing
drainage facilities which meets the approval of the State Division of
Highways and the City Engineer.
5. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked
"Exhibit Nos° 1~ 2 and 3"~ and further that subject property shall be
developed substantially in accordance with adopted Service Station
Minimum Site Development Standards.
Mr~ Martin Kreidt noted the unusual location of subject property
and the existing ~oning and uses in the area°
7518
City Hall~ Anaheim California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 11~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
Discussion was held by 'the Ci't¥ Council regarding Condition No.
3 of the City Planning Commission Resolution No. 1022, relating to the
installation of sidewalks along Wilshire Avenue.
The Mayor askea if the applicant wished to address the Council.
Mro Cralg Grainger, Authorized Agent, advised that Standard Oil
Company is willing to in~tall the sidewalks even though they dead-end
at the State Highway fence. Regarding Condition No. 4 of the City Plan-
ning Resolution~ Mr, Gzalnger submitted a photo showing that the existing
drainage structure is not at [he property line~ but is actually about
15 feet around the curb on State property.
Mr. Jack Kahle, 1464 West Beverly Drive, advised he had no
objection to the service station but was concerned as to restrictions
on the height and type of any advertising signs, and also felt a hazard-
ous condition would be created if access to the service station would be
from the Freeway off-ramp,
Mayor Coons advised 'that any signs which are not a part of the
building, but a free-standing $ign~ would have to be by a separate ap-
plication before the Ci[y Council~ Regarding the access, the only vehicular
access will be off Wilshire Avenue, as the State property is fenced.
'The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, there
being no ~esponse declared the hearing closed°
RESOLUTION NO, 64R-99: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 64R-99
authorizing the p~eparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as
requested subject to 'the recommendations of the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolu'tion Book,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIT"/' OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DETERMINING THAT ~TLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES
SHOULD BE CHANGED {63-64-67 ,- C,-2~
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following 'vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler~ Schutte, Krein and Coons
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-99 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-100: Councilman $chutte offered Resolution No. 64R-100
for adoption granting Conditional Use Permit Noo 523 subject to the recom-
mendations of the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book~
A RESOLUTION OF rile CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 523.
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte~ Iirein and Coons
NOES: COUNCILMEN; None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayoz declared Resolution No. 64R,-100 duly passed and adopted.
Councilman Schutte left the meetin9~ 8;45 P.M~
7S19
Cit.y Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 11~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
.PUBLIC HEARINGS - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-44 AND VARIANCE NO. 1605: Submitted
by Clifford J~ LaBorde~ R. S. Kitahata, and Richard P. Kuehn~ Owners~ J. 3,
Ausilio, Authorized Agent, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-3 and
waiver of one-story height limitation and side yard setback requirements
to permit the construction of a 35 unit apartment building with carports,
on property located on the west side of Harbor Boulevard approximately
685 feet south of South Street, and further described as 861 South Harbor
Boulevard.
The City Planning Commission pursuant 'to their Resolutions Nos.
941 and 942 Series 1963-64~ at their meeting of October 14th, 1963~ recom-
mended that reclassifica'tion and variance be approved, subject to conditions.
Public hearing was held before the City Council on November 19th, 1963, and
pursuant to Council Resolutions Nos. 63R-916 and 63R-917 said applications
were denied. Reconsideration of said action taken by the City Council was
granted on January 14th, 1964, at the request of Mr, Ausilio on the basis
of hardship inasmuch as a request for commercial zoning was also previously
denied and subject property is presently surrounded on 'three sides by R-3
and C-1 zoned property~
Mro Martin Kreidt noted the location of subject property and the
existing uses and zoning in the area. Regarding the petitioner's request to
have access from Harbor Boulevard and Bellview Street, which would result in
a 30 foot drive sez'ving as a 64 foot collector ~'treet for subject property
and the R.-3 development 'to the west, he advised 'that the staff felt this
will create a traffic problem and therefor recommended that the access to
all garages be from Bellview Street~ and the 20 foot dedicated alley abutting
subject property to the west, and that approximately 20 off-street guest
parking spaces be provided adjacent to Harbor Boulevard with access to Harbor
Boulevard onlyo
The Mayo~- asked if the applican't wished to address the Council.
Mr. John Ausilio, 6022 San Lorenzo Drive, Buena Park, acting
agent for Mro Clifford LaBorde~ adv.i~ed they ax'e still considerinq the
original plans submitted and are in complete agreement with the C~ty Planning
Commission recommendations with the exception of their denial of the waiver
of the height limitations, as this would result in 'the loss of six two bedroom
apartment units and in view of 'the high land cost, 'this will place a hardship
on the ownerSo He was of the opinion the additional height will not invade
privacy because with the widening of Harbor Boulevard the distance from the
proposed structures to the properties ac~'oss tlhe street would be approximately.
130 feet; he further advised that prior to making 'the arrangements for this R-3
proposal, they ~onta:~ted Coldwell B.~nkez and A~o~iate~ and at that time they.
indicated tha't the area will not support a C.-i project, and he was of the
opinion that their statement is substantiated by the apparent number of
existing 'vacancies of office space in the immediate area at the present
time.
Councilman $chutte returned to the mee'ting, 8:50 P.M.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council,
there being no response, declared ~he hearing closed°
Councilman Coons stated he favored subject development when it
was previously before the Council, but having 9iven 'the matter further
study and closely observing the traffi.c conditions on Harbor Boulevard,
he was now of the opinion that access to Harbor Boulevard hs proposed~
would create hazardous situations.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-101; Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 6AR-lO1
for adoption, authorizin9 the preparation of necessary ordinance changing
the zone as requested, subject to the following conditions:
l.
That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim
a strip of land 45 feet in width from the ~enter line of the street
along Harbor Boulevard for street lighting purposes.
7520
~.ity Hail, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUIE$ - February 11, 1964, 1:30 P.M.
2~
e
That the completion of 'these reclassification proceedings is con-
'tingen't upon the 9ranting of Variance No. 1605o
That Condition No. 1 above mentioned, shall be complied with within
a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the
City Council may grant,
That the vehicular access rights to Harbor Boulevard shall be dedicated
to the City of Anaheim, said dedication shall be complied with within
a period of 180 days hereof~ or such further time as the City Council
may grant°
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND
DEIERMINING IHAI TITLE 18 OF IHE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAI THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES
SHOULD BE CHANGEDo (63-64-44 - R-3)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by 'the following vote:
AYES: COUNC!LM~N: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Ar, in and Coons
NOES .. C OUNC I LMEN: No ne
ABSENI: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor~ declared Resolu'tion NCo 64R-101 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R~,102: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-102
for adoption~ granting Varlance No. 1605~ as requested (2-story), subject
to the following .conditions~
Ae
2~
e
o
.
.
Tha't 'the sidewalks shall be ins'tailed along Harbor Boulevard as re-
quired by the City Engineer, and in accordance with standard plans
and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer, prior
to final building inspection,
That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the sum of $25~00 per dwelling unit to be used for park and recreation
purposes~ said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is
issued°
That 'trash storage areas ~shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file in the office of the Director of Public ~orks, prior to
final building inspection.
That this variance is granted subject 'to the completion of the Re-
classification No, 63-6.4.=44~
That the vehicular access ri9hts to Harbor Boulevard be dedicated to
the City of Anaheim, and that said dedication be complied with within
a period of 180 days from date hereof~ or such further time as the
City Council may gran'to
A 30 foot opening between the garages on the south property line and
the main building shall be closed with a solid wall, architecturally
compatible with the balance of the architecture~
Final plans for development shall be approved by the City Council
prior to the issuance of a buildin9 permit,
Refer 'to Resolu'tlon BOOko
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 1605,
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adoPted
by the following vote~
AYES.~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Chandler', $chutte~ Krein and Coons
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved for a fifteen minute recess, Councilman
Dutton seconded the motion, MOIION CARRIED. (9.'00 P.M.)
7521
City Hall, Anaheim~ Cailfornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 11~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
AFIER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order~ all the members of the
Council being present°
PUBLIC HEARINGS - RECLA$$!FICAIION NO~ 63-6~-20 AND COi~D!7.!ONAL 'USE PERMIT
NO. 4657 RECLASSIFICATION .N_O. 62-64-21 AND CONDfTiONAL USE PERMIT NO. 466:
Mayor Coons asked if he was correct in hi~ under~;'tanding 'that the properties
described in Reclasslfi<.ation No, 62-64-20 and Reglassification No. 63-64-21
have been combined and are now under, one owne~ship~ and ~urther~ if the evi-
dence to be submitted oould be ~:~ppl;ed to bo'th applica'tions~
Mrs Rinker zepiied that R;nkez Development Company now own¢
both parcel~ in ~itte, and [hat he had no objection to the Council con-
sidering both applications jolntlyo
RECLASSiFiCATION NO. 63-64~20 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 465:
Orlglnally submitted by Ray Oakes~ Ownez~ Rinke.[ Development Corporation, Agent,
requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-.3 and pe'r.mission to establlsh a
sln91e-story multiple planned family realdenti~l development with carports,
on property located at ~ha northaa~,~t corner o~ the intersection of the New-
port and R~ver:side Freewa¥~ sa:id propez'ty ,~o:~ezin9 approximately 14 acres.
[he City Planning Comml,~::_,ion pursuant to thelr Resolution No.
1008~ Series 1963-6~, i~.e~ommended s':~id re,ilass!fi,~at[on be denied.
The City Planning :Uomml:~zon pu~:~uan't ~o their Resolution No.
1009~ Sea'!es 1963-64,.~ den.Led "onditi_onal U':e Perm. it No. ,465~
RECLASSiF '_'CATION NO,., 63-6,.~-2i AND CONDiFIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 466:
Submitted by Rinker Development Corporation ,and Charles ,is Biddle, Owners,
Development Coordinato:~:~,~ Agent,, ]eque ,t;,,ng ~= 'hange in zone 'from R-A to R-3
and permission to :onstzu~:t two ~to~y multiple fatalist planned residential
development with waiver of one~,~toz'y heigh~ limitation~ on property located
at the northeast ,:orner of the Znte:zse t~on of the Riverside and Newport
Freeways~ the eastern boundary' being adja, ent :o the Anaheim city limits
lines Sald property ~over~ approximately
The Ci':y Planning Commi,:~',on puzsuan't to their Resolution No.
1010~ Series 1963.~,6~ ~'e~ommeaded ~a'!,d ~e la,~f!:ation be denied.
The City Planning Commi~z;on pur::~uant to thei:r Resolution No,
101], Series 1963,-6,~ denled :3onditional g~e Permit No. 466~
Mr~ Mart"n Kreidt outiined the lo:at:ion of subject property,
and advised that the appl:[~:~t}.on~ were heard be[oxe the Commission on
several occa:~ions and a number, o~ q~aff ana~e~ o~ the plan submitted
and that of the are'~ ~e~e prepared, tndi~:atlng ho~ the area m~ght be
affected by vaz:ious types of development with various densities~
Mr.~ Kreidt disaus-~-ed at length the ,;ontents of the staff reports
dated December 9~ 1963, and 3~anuary 6~ 196~ pertaining to subject applica-
tions and read in full 'the Flnding:s of the City Planning Commission.
it was noted that ~:op~es of sa~d reports had pre'viousl¥ been
furnished each Councilman for their ~'evlew and :~tudyo Plans and the files
were reviewed by 'the City Council and Mayor Coons read in full communica-
tion dated February ltth~ 1964~ :received from Great ~estern Land Company,
Mervin B, .7ohn?son~P~.es:ident~ ~dv~sinq that they have reviewed 'the appli-
c:ant~'s over-all layout ~nd the eievat~on :tud~e-:, of the proposed struc-
tures~ and with the buffer area of :ingle story buildings abutting their
Tracts Nos. 442~7 and 5000~ they' have no objection to the requested zone
change.
The Mayor. asked if .Mr:, Rinker wished 'to address fihe Council.
Mr~ Rinker ::{rated they pzopone a very high quality development
consisting of 618 unit:~ on 58,,94 a,:;:~e~.~ .~nd using 'the gross acreage, they
would have a den~i'ty of only 10.~5 dwelling units per' acre~ He submitted
colored renderings of 'the proposed ex'te.t'lc:;-_~ ~:nd a [ar'ge general layout in
7522
Gity Hall~ Anaheim~ California ,- COUNCIL MINUIES - February 11~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
_
color of the entire development.
Mro Darrell Meyer, Development Coordinator~ pointed out some of
the reasoning that has gone into this proposed development, being of the
opinion it represented ~n excellent ,ompromise between R-1 and a re-
gular R-30evelopment and noted tha't this mode of living is becomin9
most popular and widely accepted. He advised that the wide streets that
come into the project from the periphery or circulatory streets will be
dedicated~ and 'the short '"T~ streets indicated between units will eliminate
through ~traffic on the non-dedicated streets° That he felt their proposal
leaned more towards an R-1 type developmen't as their density is moderate,
each unit has a private patio~ and they have provided space for two cars
per dwelling unit. [urther~ that the single story buffer extends approxi-
mately 250 feet from ~tr~ Johnson's property. In further explaining their
plan$, he advised 'there wlll be five complete recrea.tional areas provided~
fwo o~ which will have large Olympi~-type pools~ clubhouses for meetings
and children's group~, etc~ and the other areas contain smaller fenced
pools and playground equipment~ in one area there is also provided a
baseball diamond°
Mr- Meye~ submitted an enlargement of 'the living unit itself~
showing patio and carport and an ,aerial prospective showing %he rela~ion-
ship between the two-story buildings~ pools~ clubhouses~ streets, etc.,
as they envisioned the proposed project~
At the request of Mayor Coons~ ~[r, Rinker advised there were
seven typical exterio~ rendezing:~ ~hown and that they would reduce the
renderings and exhibits submitted 'to color Kodachrome photographs so that
they could be made a part of the files°
Mr~ Harry Rinker stated~ with reference to access to the property,
that they would not sell or occupy the dwellings until the Batavia Street
over-pass is comple'ted by the Sta'te and available for access. That the
access of Santa Aha Canyon Road will be used only for an entry to building
models~ but not for occupancy of dwellings~
~mo Maddox, City Engineer~ in answer to Council questioning,
estimated said street ~onstruction would be completed in approximately
eighteen mon'ths~
The Mayo: ~sked if anyone wished to address the Council, there
being to re:sponse declared the he~.~in9 c:losed.
RESOLUTION NOo 64R~103 ,- RECLASSiFiCATION NO. 63-6.4-20: Councilman
Schutte offered Resolution No,~ 64R~103 for adoption~ authorizing the
preparation of the neles~ary ordinance changing the zone as requested
subject to 'the following ,ionditions:
le
2o
e
re
That a Final tract Map of ~ubject property be approved by the City
Council and re,sorded in the offi~:e of the Orange County Recorder.
That ~ubject property ~hail di,~pose of 'their drainage into the
Santa Aha River, subjec:t to 'the approval of the Orange County Water
Distrio't~ Orange County Flood Control and 'the City Engineer. All
drainage across Batav:a Street shall be by means of an underground
storm drain sy~temo
That alley cut-offs and/or radii conform to the Standard Plan
No. 130 on file in the office of the City Engineer.
That the acce,}~ road to the northern,-most street~ adjacent to the
Santa Ana River levee, shall be relocated easterly of :the existing
location shown on the map~ to more adequately clear the Batavia
Street Overpas~
That the grade and aiignment of 'the Batavia Street Overpass shai1 be
approved by the State Divi:~ion of Highways~
That the exterior s't~eets shall be 55 feet wide with the exterior one
(1) foot being reserved by the owner of the subject property and used
for the ~ons'truction of a six (6~' foot masonry wall
That the vehicular a~cess rights~ exc~ep't at street and/or alley open-
ings~ to Batavia Street ~hall be dedicated to 'the City of Anaheim.
7523
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 11~ 1964~ 1:30 P.Mo
_
8. That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is subject
to the completion of Reclassification Nco 63-64-21 and contingent upon
the granting of Conditional Use Permit Nos° 465 and 466°
9. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim~ marked
"Revision No, 1, Exhibit Nos° 1 through 17~, and in accordance with
kodachrome photos of the exhlbit:~ submitted by the applicant this date°
10. The submission of plans of development and final building plans for
approval by the City Council prior to the is~suance of a building permit.
Refez to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CiTY OF ANAHEI:M FINDING AND DETERMING
THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED
AND THAT IHE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (63-64-20 - R-3)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote~
AYES: COUNCILMEN~ Dutton~ Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
NOES; COUNCILMEN; None
ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN,. None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-103 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-104 - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 465: Councilman $chutte
offered Resolution No~ 64R=.104 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit
No. 465 subject 'to the following condition~:
.
2~
.
4~
.
e
e
8~
That the ownex~s of subje~'t property shall pay 'to the City of Anaheim
the sum of $25o00 per dwellin9 unit~ to be u~ed for park and recreation
purposes~ said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued.
That trash storage areas ~hall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file in the office of the Diz. eotor of Public Works, prior to
final buildin9 inspeetiono
That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and determined to be
necessary by the Chief of 'the Fire Departmen't~ to be installed prior to
final building inspe~tiono
That this Conditional 'Os, Permit is 9ranted subjeot to the completion of
Reclassification Nco 63-64=20o
Specific requirements of the R-3 Zone for building setbacks and distances
between buildings are waived~ upon 'the condition that such setbacks and
distances between buildings shall be approved in conjunction with the
approval of building plans~ which plans ~hall be submitted to and approved
by the City Coun¢il~ prior to the issuanoe of building permits.
That a 6 foot masonry wall shall be ~onstructed around the perimeter of
the projeet inoorporated in Conditional Use Permlt Nos. 465 and 466,
prior to final building inspe~::tion.
That tree wells shall be provlded at approximate 40 foot intervals in
the Batavia Street parkways and all proposed street parkways abutting
subject property~ thai plans for said tree wells and plantin9 of trees
therein shall be submitted to and approved by 'the Superintendent of
Parkway Maintenance; and said tree wells shall be planted with trees
prior to final building inspection; or~ payment of 15¢ per front foot
for parkway planting~ to be paid at the time 'the building permit is
issuedo
All carports and garages shall be at lea~t 10 feet by 20 feet.
Installation of a modified cul-de-sac at the west stub end of Addington
Driver in compliance with requirements of the City Engineer.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 465o
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted.
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
NOE$~ COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
7524
City Hall~ Anaheim, California .- COUNCIL MINUTES - February 11~ 1964~ 1;30 PoM.
The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 64R-104 duly passed and adopted,
RESOLUTION NO~ 64R-i05 - RECLASSiFiCATiON NO. 63-64-21: Councilman Schutte
offered Resolution No. ~4R-105 for adoption, authorizing the preparation
of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the follow-
ing conditions:
1. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City
Council and z~eoorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder.
2o That the subject property shall die, pose of their drainage into the
Santa Ana River~ subject to the approval of the Orange County Water
District, Orange County Flood Control and the City Engineer, All
drainage across Batavia Street shall be by means of an underground
storm drain sy~:~temo
3. That alley cut-offs and/or radii conform to the Standard Plan No, 130
on ffle in 'the office of the City Engineer.
4, That the access road ~o the northern-most s~reet, adjacent to the Santa
Ana River levee~ shall be relocated easterly of the existing location
shown on the map~ to more adequately ¢lea~ the Batavia Street Overpass,
5. That 'the grade and alignment of the Batavia Street Overpass shall be
approved by the State Division of Highways~
6. That the exterior st~eet~ shall be 55 feet wide with the exterior one
~.[1~, foot being re,~erved by the owner of the subject property and used
° ~6) foot masonry wall
for the construct.ion of a s:x .,. ,
~ That 'the vehicula~'a~-cess ~ghts~ except at street and/or alley
openings~ to Batavia Street shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim,
That the sompletion of 'these re,:.;lassifica'tion proceedings is subject to
the completion of Re, iassification NCo 63~-64,-20 and contingent upon
the 9ranting of Conditional Use Permit Nos~ 465 and 466.
That subjec't property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifi~:;ations on file with the City of Anaheim, marked
'Revit~ion No. 1~ Exhibi't No~o 1 through 1'7"~ and in accordance with
kodac:hrome photos of the exhibits ~ubmitted by 'the applicant this date"
10. The submiasfon of plan:~ of development and final buildinq plans for
approval by the City Coun~il p:rior 'to the issuance of a ~uildin9 permit.
o
9~
Refer 'to Resolution Book°
A RESOLOT]ON OF FHE ,~,IT¥"" ,,~,OUN~ilL'" n OF THE CiTY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN-
ING THAT tiTLE 18 OF ~HE ANAHEIM MUN'~_CZPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE
AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARZES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (63-64-21
,- R.~3)
On roll ~all the foregoing resolution 'was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Chandler~ Schutte~ Krein and Coons
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNC [£LMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No~ 64R-105 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-i06 ,=CONDi[IONAL USE PERMIT NO, 466: Councilman $chutte
offered Resolution No. 64R~,,106 for adoption 9ranting Conditional Use Permit
No. 466 subject to the following Gonditionsg
e
~
That 'the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recreation
purposes, said amoun't to be paid at 'the 'time the building permit is issued.
That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to
final building ;inspection,
That fire hydrant~ shall be installed as required and determined to be
necessary by 'the Chief of the Fire Department, to be installed prior to
final building inspection~
Tha't this Conditional Use Permit is 9z~an.ted subject to the completion of
Reclassification No, 63.~64-21~
7525
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February i11 1964~ 1:30 P.M.
e
6~
e
®
Specific requirements of the R-.3 Zone for buildin9 setbacks and
distances between buildings are waived, upon the condition that such
setbacks and distances between buildings shall be approved in
junction with 'the approval of building plans, which plans shall be
submitted 'to and approved by the City Council~ prior to the issuance
of building permi'ts~
That a 6 foot masonry wall shall be cons'true'ted around the perimeter
of the project incorporated in Conditional Use Permit Nos. 465 and
466, prior to final building inspection°
That tree wells shall be provided at approximate 40 foot intervals
in the Batavia Street parkways and all proposed street parkways
abutting subject property; that plans for said tree wells and plant-
ing of trees therein shall be submitted to and approved by the Super-
intendent of Parkway Maintenance~ and °aid tree wells shall be planted
wi'th trees prior to final buildlng inspection; or, payment of 15¢ per
front foot for parkway planting~ to be paid a't 'the time the building
permit is issued°
All carports and garages shall be at least 10 feet by 20 feet.
Installation of a modified cul-de-sac at 'the west stub end of Addington
Drive~ in complianse with requirements of the City Engineer.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. ~66~
On roll call 'the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vote:
AYES; COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler., Schutte~ Krein and Coons
NOES: COUNC I LMEN ~ None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-106 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFiCATiON NO. 63~64~-.72: Submit'ted by Herman H. Bruns~
requesting a change of zone from C-2 and P,~L 'to C~O on property located
at the southeast corner of Los Angeles Street and Clifton Avenue~ and
further described as i102 South Los Angeles Street°
The City Planning Commission pursuant to their Resolution No. 1023,
Series 1963-6~ recommended said reclassification be approved to establish a
professional office building subject to the followin9 conditions:
1. That the owners of ~ubject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a
strip of land 53 fee't in width~ from the center line of the street, along
Los Angeles Street~ for :s'greet widenin9 purposes,
2. That the owners of subject property shall acquire Lot A of Tract No. 2757
to provide for access to Clifton Avenue,
3. That 'the owners of subject proper~y shall deed to 'the City of Anaheim a
strip of land 30 feet in width~ from ~e sente~ line of the street~ along
Ctifton Avenue, fo~ st~ee[ widening purposes°
4. That owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum
of $2°00 per front foot~ alon9 Clifton Avenue and Los Angeles Street~
for street lighting purpose$~
5. Yhat sidewalks shall be installed along Clifton Avenue and Los Angeles
Street, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard
plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer prior
to final building inspection° The sidewalks on Los Angeles Street shall
be installed at the ultimate losation and 9radeo
6. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a
5.-foot public utility easement along the sou'therly boundary of subject
property~
7. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works~ prior to
final building inspection.
8. That Condition Nos~ 1, 2, 3~ 4 and 6~ above mentioned~ shall be complied
with within a perlod of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time
as the City Council may grant.
7526
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - GOUNG!L MINUTES - February 11~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M,
9. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked
"Exhibit Nos, 1 and 2~, and in accordance with all provisions of the
C-O, Commercial Off.ice, Zone.
Mr. Mar'tin Kreidt outlined 'the location of subject property~
noting the existing uses and zoning in 'the immediate area.
Plans and the file were reviewed b'y the City Council, and the
Mayor asked if anyone wished to address 'the Council,
Mr, Webb~ 15'70 East 17th Street, Santa Aha, advised that in
connection with subject property~ there has been a request by the City
for a 10 foot drainage-sewer easement along the southerly boundary which
will service the property contiguous to ~ubject property on the east~
being an apartment project planned by S. V. Hunsaker and Son (63-64-47).
That he personally procured from Mr. and Mrs. Bruns said easement~ but
now finds that the 10 feet have been fenced off and there is an open
drainage ditch, which in effect~ fen,:es out the recorded owner and denies
him use of his property. He requested that [his matter also be resolved
at this time if possi~le~ because he felt 'these elderly people were not
aware of the changes made° That the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission were in conflict because they approved plans indicating parking
on a portion of said easement~
Mr, Maddox~ City Engineez~ explained that there was a 10 foot
easement obtaine~ by the 'tract developer for City purposes, and was designed
as an open drain, however, he believed that it was now being redesigned as
a closed drain to carry t~affic~ so it could be used for parking or for
purposes other than building, That it apparently was still under study as
he had not seen the final plans,
Plot plan and the file were reviewed by the City Council and it
was determined that the request of Nrc Webb :ould be handled as departmental and
would not affect the deci~ion wi~h regard to the use of the property.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council~
'there being no response declared the hearing closed,
RESOLUTION NO. 64R,~10'7: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-107
for adoption~ authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing
the zone as requested ~ubject to the recommendations of the City Planning
Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book,
A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN-
ING THAT ~ITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE
AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (63-64-72
- c-o)
On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted
by the following vo'te:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-107 duly passed and adopted.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn, Councilman Schutte seconded the
motion, MOTION CARRIED. (11:15
SIGNED: DENE M. W!LLiAMS, C!'~Y CLERK
Deputy City Clerk