Loading...
1964/02/187527 City Hall~ Anaheim~ Cal:fornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 18~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Chandler~ Schutte, Krein and Coons. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. PRESENT: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler~ CITY CLERK: Dene M, Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt. Mayor' Coons called the meeting to order. MINUTES: On motion by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Chandler, minutes of the Anaheim City Council meeting held January 28, 1964~ were approvedo MOIION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NOo 64R-108 - WORK ORDER NO~ 1803: On the recommendations o£ the City Engineer~ Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-108, awarding Work Order No. 1803 to Saunders Brothers, in the amount o£ $10,425.00, the low bid° Refer to Resolution Book o A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES~ MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION~ INCLUDING POWER AND FUEL, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: DRILLING AN 18-INCH WATER WELL TO AN APPROXIMATE DEPTH OF 325 FEET, AT 518 SOUTH LOS ANGELES STREET, iN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, TO BE DESIGNATED "WELL NO. 3~," WORK ORDER NO. 1.803. (Saunders Brothers) On roll. call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Chandler~ Schutte, Krein and Coons° NOES: COUNCILMEN: None~ ABSENT: COUNC I LMEN: None, The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-108 duly passed and adopted. PRIVATE PATROL APPLICATION - Jo R. BUESING: Application of J. R. Buesing for per- mission to establish a Private Patrol in the City of Anaheim, was deferred from the meeting of February 11~ 1964, pending further investigation. Mr. Buesing was present, and submitted a letter from Mr. Ken Reaf- snyder concerning the qualities of "Dirk", a Patrol Dog, and was prepared to show a film demonstrating his police abilities (said letter was read in full). Chief of Police Mark Ac Stephenson advised that since the last Council meeting, he and Mr. Buesing have reviewed the Police report prev- iously submitted, that a couple of discrepancies have been noted; however, these discrepancies are minor and do not change the original report to a great degree. On the basis of the Chief of Police investigation and recommenda- tion, said application was denied, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte~ MOTION CARRIED. CALIFORNIA PEACE OFFICERS' TRAINING: Chief of Police Mark A. Stephenson presented a check in the amount of $1~629.60 from California Peace Officers' Training Fund, representing reimbursement to the City of 5~ of salary paid to seven officers for a five-week special training course. On motion by Councilman Ghandler~ seconded by Councilman Krein, said check was received and ordered forwarded to the Director of Finance for deposit in the proper fund. MOIION CARRIED. 75 28 Qiiy Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 18, 1964, 1'.30 P.M. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 229: Request of F. Thomas Zak, Project Engineer of Chrysler Motor Corporation, £or relie£ of twenty-foot P-L Zone~ established at the southeast corner, along Los Angeles Street and Ball Road £rontage, and request £or approval o£ revised plans of landscaping~ were submitted and reviewed together with report of Planning Department-Development Review. Mr. Zak advised that the contractor is ready to install underground conduit for the lighting system~ and they would be willing to post a bond pending further Council action° Discussion was held concerning Council directive to City Planning Commission to consider reduction of the P-L Zone along the east side of South Los Angeles Street from Ball Road to Cerritos Avenue. Also noted was the fact that this directive did not include any Ball Road frontage. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dut~on, posting o£ a $500.00 cash bond was authorized~ pending decision on reduction of P-L Zone and setback requirement, it being understood that this action will in no way pre-determine action on pending zoning. MOTION CARRIED. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Planning Commission was requested to include in their study~ pres- ently being made~ the south side of Ball Road frontage to the first alley east of Los Angeles Street. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO~ 63-64-42 AND VARIANCE NO. 1604: Submitted by Allen E. Bard- well (Leonard Smith, Agenl), requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3, property briefly described as located on the north side of Ball Road, approximately 170 feet west of Webster Street; and further requesting per- mission to construct a twenty-seven unit apartment building~ waiving one- story height limitation, sideyard requirements, and 1~ garage requirements, to permit construction of carports. Public hearing was held November 19, 1963, and January 28, 1964, at which time said hearing was closed and application referred back to the City Planning Commission to be considered in conjunction with Reclassi- fication No. 63-64-62. Communication was submitted from Mr. Smith, dated January 29, 1964, requesting Lot 20 and the south 241.51 feet portion of Lot 1, Block "A", of Tract No. 787, be deleted from Application Nco 63-64-62 and con- sidered under original Application, No. 63-64-42. Mr. Kreidt reported that Reclassification No. 63-64-62 was considered by the City Planning Commission yesterday~ and will be recommend- ing an amendment to the General Plan of the Webster Street area, from approximately Orange Avenue %o Ball Road~ to low medium density; and that Reclassification No. 63-64-62 be approved, subject to conditions; that rezoning be accomplished separately as development occurs~ and construction be limlted to one-story within 150 feet of any single family subdivision or R-1 property. Mro Kreidt further advised that plans of 63-64-42 have been revised to one-story construction, and would now come within the recommen- dations that will be forthcoming on Reclassification No. 63-64-62. On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, request to withdraw subject property from Reclassification No. 63-64-62 was granted. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-109: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 64R-109 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance, changing %he zone as requested, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owners of subject property pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Ball Road for street lighting purposes. 2o That completion of these Reclassification proceedings be contingent upon the granting of Variance Nco 1604. 7529 ~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februa~l:30 P.M. 3. That Condition No. 1 above-mentioned be complied with within a Period of 180 days from daie hereof~ or such further time as the City Council may grant. . 4. Thai subject property be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked "~xhiblt Nos. 1~ Revision No. 1, through 5",as amended and applicable tO single-story structure. 5. That the structural height limitation of one-story within 150 £eet of R-1 Zone, Single Family Residential property, be maintained. 6. That tree wells shall be provlded at approximately £orty (40) foot intervals in the Ball Road pa6kway abutting subject property; that plans for said tree wells and 'planting of trees therein shall be sub- mltted to and approved by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Said tree wells shall be planted with trees prior to Final Building Inspection. 7. Reclassification to be subject to appropriate action for amendment to the General Plan. 8. That a six foot masonry wall, or its equivalen%~ shall be constructed along the north and west property lines, prior to Final Building Inspec- tion. 9. That a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City o£ Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of a six foot masonry wall along the east property line, prior to Final Building Inspection. Refer to Resolution Book, A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE i8 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (63-64-42 - R-3) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons° NOES: COUNCILMEN: None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None° Mayor Coons declared Resolution No. 64R-109 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-110: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 64R-110 for adoption~ granting Variance No..1604, in part, granting waiver of side- yard requirements, and one and one-fourth garage requirements to permit the construction of carports, subject to the followin9 conditions: 1. That sidewalks be installed along Ball Road as required by the City Engineer, and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer, prior to Final Building Inspection. 2o That the owners of' subject property pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25~00 per dwellin9 unit to be used for Park and Recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time 'the building permit is issued° 3o That trash storage areas be provided in accordance with approved plans on £ile in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to Final Building Inspection. 4. That the variance be granted subject to the completion of Reclassifica- tion No. 63-64-42. 5. That the rear and side walls of the proposed carports be finished with exterior building materials, that enclosed storage cabinets of a minimum dimension of thirty-six (36) inches by forty-two (42) inches high, running the entire width of each carport, be provided at the rear wall~ and that adequate bumper guards be provided to protect the interior walls of the carport, prior to Final Building Inspection. 75~0 Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 18~ 1964~ 1;30 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1604, On roll call the foregoing Resolution Noo 64R-110 was duly passed and adopted by the following vote; AYES; COUNCILMEN; Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. NOES: COUNCILMEN: None~ ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-110 duly passed and adopted. SIGN REQUEST: Request of Rich Sign and Neon Company on behalf of West-Lin Cleaners for permission to erect a non-conforming sign at 3156 West Lincoln Avenue, was deferred from the meeting of January 28, 1964, to allow the applicant an opportunity to obtain approval of other businesses of an inte- grated sign for the area. Communication was submitted and read, dated February 17, 1964, from Leonard Kessler, owner of West-Lin Cleaners, advising of his attempt to obtain an integrated sign, and the reasons adequate signin9 for his business was necessary. Said letter further advised that~ should sign permit be granted, the two existing signs advertising subject business would be removed. Also submitted were pictures showing existing signs in the area. Discussion was held by the City Council; at the conclusion thereof, on motion by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Chandler, sign permit was granted, subject to the removal of the two existing signs advertising West-Lin Cleaners, and further subject to no projection over the property line. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST, MARKALL INC.: Request for permission to establish a display portable classroom demonstration unit and office on property located at the southwest corner of Gilbert Street and Lincoln Avenue, was considered. Mro Bagnall, President of Markall Inc.~ presented brochures and specifications of the portable classrooms they manufacture, and advised that a location is necessary to display the equipment to school superintendents and members of Boards of Trustees, and other interested parties; and that the next thirty to ninety days was the critical period for their business. It was noted by the City Council that the request is for a commer- cial use of property in an R-1 subdivision, which could not be permitted without reclassification of the property; further, subject property by deed restrictions is prohibited for commercial useo Mr~ Bagnall agreed to processing a zoning application~ and further advised that they hope to purchase the property, and if the permit is granted, improve the location with an attractive display that would be a credit to the general area° Discussion was held by the City Council and it was reported that previous applications for commercial use of subject property had been made, and that in each instance, strenuous objections to any commercial use of the property were made by the residents of the tract. It was determined that the applicant should endeavor to loca~e ~he business on property presently zoned for this activity. Thereupon, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein, said request was denied. MOTION CARRIED. (Specifications and brochures returned 2o Mr. Bagnall.) PROPOSAL - SOROPTIMIST CLUB OF ANAHEIM: Proposal of Soroptimist Club of Anaheim to obtain a show wagon to be donated to the City of Anaheim for use in ~he Park and Recreation Department, was submitted and read. 7531 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California .- COUNCIL MINUTES - February 18~ 1964~ 1:30 Mrs. Monica Lombardo and Mrs. May Belle Spencer~ members of the Soroptimist Club, were present and addressed the Council concerning the project and their proposal. Mro John Collier, Park and Recreational Director, advised that in his opinion, the equipment would be of considerable use, as it was extremely flexible~ being self-contained and portable, and could be utilized for several different activities° Mr~ Collier further reported that the initial cost of the unit was $9,860~00, and additionaI~ optional equipment, such as portable genera- tore, etc.~ was available° Terms of the proposal were discussed, and intent of Condition No. 2 considered~ it was suggested that the President and Board of Trustees of the Soroptimist Club meet with the City Attorney to work out details of a formal proposal. At the conclusion of the discussion, on motion by Councilman $chutte~ seconded by Councilman Dutton~ tentative approval of the project was given, subject to final approval after details of the proposal are further clarified. MOTION CARRiED. ~EQUEST - WAIVER OF BUSINESS LiCENSE~ SOCIALIST LABOR PARTY: Request of Mrs. Helen Long that the "Weekly People~' is a non-profit undertaking~ and as such~ be recognized as not sabjecZ to business license fee, was submitted. The City Attorney reported 'that according to his interpretation, under the City of Anaheim Ordinance, this activity is operated for a profit. Further, his office has advised the Socialist Labor Party that they may dis- tribute their literature within the City of Anaheim without charge~ specifying 'Free~ Donations Acceptable~', and if they do so, it would not be subject to any regulations or business license. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte~ said request was denied~ based upon the City Attorney's interpretation of the City ordinanceo MOTION CARRIED~ REQUEST - WAIVER OF BUSINESS LICENSE~ LIBRES FOUNDATION~ INC.: Request of Jo Ro McEntee for waiver of business license fee~ was submitted. Based on the verbal opinion given by the City Attorney, that this activity is operated for a prof:it~ and under' the terms of the City ordinance falls wilhin the category requiring business license, said request was denied by the City Councit~ on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Sc~utzeo MOTION CARRIED. EXTENSION OF TIME - RECLASSIFICATION NOo 63-64~9 (CONDITIONAL USE PER~IT NO~ 452): Request of Alex Lo Fishman and Eo Lee Schultz for 180 day extension of time to Reclassification No~ 63-6~-9, was granted on motion by Councilman Krein~ seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. EXTENSION OF TIME - RECLASSIFICATION NOo 62-63-67: Request of Robert E. Kramer, Authorized Agent, for extension of time to September 5, 1964, was granted to Reclassification No~ 62-63-67, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED~ EXTENSION OF TIME - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIt NO~ 455: Request of Pastor Fred D. Dommer for extension of time was submitted° On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Krein, six months~ extension of time from date of expiration was granted. MOTION CARRIED. REVISED PLANS - RECLASSIFICATION NO~ 59-60-39: Request of Russel. O. Roquet for approval of revised plans~ was submitted and reviewed by the City Council, together with reports from City Engineer and Planning Department - Develop- ment Review~ 7532 City Hal,l~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 18~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M. Revised plans marked "Exhibit A, Revision No. 2°', stamped and dated this date by Mayor Coons, were approved on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. REVISED PLANS - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-113 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 423: Request of E. G. Warmington for approval of revised plans and waiver of side- walk construction requirements and recordation of Final Tract Map on Portion B, was submitted together with City Engineer and Planning Department - Development Review reports° Mr. Queryl, of McDaniel Engineering Company, addressed the Council regarding Condition No. 7~ and advised that originally~ Tract No. 5162 was being processed and plans were to sell individual apartment units~ however, plans have now changed and there will be no need for finalizing said tract; that the garden-type apartment project will be in one ownership, and streets will be dedicated by document, rather than tract map. RESOLUTION NOo 64R-111: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 64R-111, authorlzin9 amendment ~o Resolution Nco 63R-5i9~ as follows: CondiZion No. 4: There be added~ "prior to Final Building Inspec- tion of any development along the Ball Road frontage~~' Condition Nco 7: There be added, ~'or~ that dedication of Dauphin Street, Beacon Street and Brookmore Street be made by deed~ provided~ however~ should the dedication be made by deed, ail of the conditions required by the City Engineering office be com- plied with.~' Condition No. 10: Be amended~ substituting exhibits noted, to read: "Exhibits Nos. 1 through 9% Revision No. 2, and i0 through 21.~' Condition No. 12: Omit the figure "4~'o Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 63R-519 IN RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS NO. 62-63-113. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Chandler, Schu%te~ Krein and Coons. NOES: COUNCILMEN: None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-1ii duly passed and adopted° RECESS: Councilman Krein moved for a fifteen-minute recess. Councilman $chutte seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIEDo (3:20 P~M.) AFTER RECESS; Mayor Coons called the meeting to order, all membera of the City Council being presento ~EQUEST~ WAIVER OF BLOCK WALL REQUIREMENT - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63-92 (TRACT NO. 5063): Request of Mro Ted Fish that portion of Condition No. 3 of Ordinance Nco 1908, relating to block wall requirement along easterly property line be waived, was submitted together with City Engineer and Plannin9 Department - Development Review reportso It was noted that multiple famlly zoning was pending on the property to the East, a small portion of which is within the City of Anaheim~ and the balance of the area presently in County territory. 7533 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 18~ 1964, 1:30 Mr~ Fish advised that if the wall was constructed, it would deny the adjacent property to 'the East access of the proposed easterly alley in Tract No. 5063~ At the conclusion of the discussion, it was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Kreln, that the applicant be permitted to post a bond in the amount of $2,500.00 for a period of one year, prior to final building inspection, in lleu of construction of the wall. MOTION CARRIED~ ORANGE COUNTY STREET NAMING COMMITTEE: Mr~ Thornton E. Piersall, Director of Public Works~ reported on meeting held February 4~ 1964~ concerning the re-naming of Grand Avenue, Glassell Street, Dowling Avenue, Kraemer Avenue~ and Carolina Avenue. On motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Krein, Mr. Piersall was directed to indicate ±o the Orange County Street Naming Com- mittee that there was no special significance to the name of "Dowling Avenue", as far as the City of Anaheim is concerned, and that the City of Anaheim will yield to whatever name the other cities select. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 60-61-40; Planning Department - Development Review reported that building plans for an R-3 development was presently pending on subject property, and recommended that subject reclassification for C-1 zoning be terminated~ prior to final building inspection of the R-3 development. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-112: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-112, terminating ail proceedings in connection with Reclassification No. 60-61-40. Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH RECLASSIFICATION NO. 60-61-40. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the followin9 vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. NOES: COUNCILMEN: None~ ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-112 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-113 - JOB NO. 839: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R~113, rejecting bid received on Job No. 839, to be re-advertised at a later date for smaller units, as recommended by the City Engineer. Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CIIY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REJECTING ALL BIDS RECEIVED UP TO THE HOUR OF 2:00 O~CLOCK P.M. ON FEBRUARY 13, 1964, FOR PUBLIC WORKS JOB NO. 839. On roil call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: DutZon, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. NOES: COUNCILMEN: None~ ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 6aR-113 duly passed and adopted. 7,?)34 ~itv Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUIE$ - February 18~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M. Mayor Coons recommended the Golf Course Manager make arrangements to have temporary facilities until this job is readvertised, and the project completed. The temporary facilities to be located, perhaps~ between the Sixth Green and Seventh Tee~ and Thirteenth Green and Fourteenth Tee. WORK ORDER NO. 4600 AND WORK ORDER NOv 4501 - WILLIAM D~ GRESCHNER CON%CANT: On the recommendation of the City Attorney, it was moved by Councilman DuO'on, seconded by Councilman Chandler~ that liquidated damages on a settled basis in the amount of $2,100~00~ and adjusted utility charges in the amoun~ of $3,285.35, be approved. MOTION CARRIED. WORK ORDER NOo 4501, CENTRAL LIBRARY - CHANGE ORDER NO. 12: On the recommenda- tion of the City Engineer~ Change Order No. 12, Credit $9,354.009 was approved~ on motion by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED. WORK ORDER NO. 4600~ POLICE FACILITIES - CHANGE ORDER NO~ 16: On the recommen- dation of the City Engineer, Change Order No. 169 Credit $450.009 was approved9 on motion by Councilman Dutton9 seconded by Councilman Chandler. MOTION CARRIED~ CITY GASOLINE CONTRACT: On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte9 continued purchase of City gasoline requirements under County of Orange contract for the next ~welve months, was authorized. MOTION CARRIED. FINANCIAL AND OPERATING REPORTS: Financial and Operating Reports for the month of 3anuary9 1964, were ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Krein~ seconded by Councilman Chandler° MOTION CARRIED. EXPENSE ACCOUNTS - CITY COUNCILMEN: Discussion was held concerning the estab- lishment of a fixed amount per meeting to cover expenses incurred by each Councilman in the preparation for said meeting, similar to the expense account established and recently increased for members of the City Planning Commission. Mayor Coons reported that over the past two years~ he maintained a record of expenses incurred, and those directly attributable to Council meeting preparation would average approximately $80.00 per month. This amount did not include expenses incurred for attendances to special meet- ings or functions attended in the office of Mayor. Further, in his opinion9 the average amount was conservative~ as it was practically impossible to maintain an accurate record of mileage~ and time lost in the operation of one's businesso Councilman Schutte stated that he would estimate his expenses closer to $200.00 per month° Mr. Geisler advised the Council of their right to submit an itemized statement of expense for reimbursement~ and further advised that many cities have established a regular amount as it is rather difficult for anyone to keep a record of actual expense. In his opinion, as long as the amount established was reasonable and one that has been carefully considered, it could be legally accomplished. It was further determined that such fixed expense amount would be for expense incurred in the ordinary Council meetings; that any specific or additional City business authorized by the City Council would be reimbursed upon submittal of itemized statement. Based on the testimony given by Mayor Coons and Councilman Schutte, Councilman Chandler moved it be the finding of the City Council that $25.00 per meeting for Councilmen, and $50~00 per meeting for Mayor, is a reasonable amount for expense account for the preparation for any regular or special called meeting~ and that the City Attorney be instructed to prepare an amendment to Section 1.04.380 of the Anaheim Municipal Code accordingly. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. 7535 City Hall,.Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 18~ 1964~ 1:30 RESOLUTION NO~ 64R-114: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No, 64R-114 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND MRS. JESSIE L. GOODMAN WITH REFERENCE TO SERVING WATER TO LOT 13 OF TRACT 796. On roi1 call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton~ Chandlery $chutte~ Krein and Coons. NOES: COUNCII~EN: None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN; None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-114 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-115: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-115 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CIIY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Russel O. Roquet, et ux) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: ~' AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, $chutte, Krein and Coons. NOES: COUNCILMEN: None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-115 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO, 64R-116: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-116 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR EAS£M£NTS FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY, AND PUBLIC UTILITY OVERHANG PURPOSES. (Southeastern California Association of Seventh-Day Adventists) On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. NOES: COUNCILMEN: None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. _. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-116 duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler. a. Feather River Project Association Newsletter of January 31, 1964. b. ~ea~her River Project Association Notice of Meeting~ Frid.ay~ February 28, 1964. c. Department of Water Resources, tentative agenda for meeting February 7, 1964. d. Summary of action taken at regular meeting of State Water Quality Con- trol Board on December 17, 1963. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO, 1971: Councilman Chandler offered Ordinance No. 1971 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. 7536 Cit.¥ Nall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTEg - February lg~ 1964~ I:GO P.M. AN ORDINANCE OF TNE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-4V - R-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1971 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived° Councilman Dutton ~econded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler~ $chutte, Krein and Coons, NOES: COUNCILMEN: None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No~ 1971 duly passed and adopted, ORDINANCE NOo 1972: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 1972 for final reading° Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (62-63-63 - C-1 and R-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1972 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Chandler moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing ordinance was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. NOES: COUNCILMEN: None° ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None~ Mayor Coons declared Ordinance No. 1971 duly passed and adopted. TRANSFER OF FUNDS: Statement of Harry C~ Williams, Special Counsel to Citizens' Charter Committee, in the amount of $7~773o93, was submitted. Mr~ Robert Davis, Assistant City Manager, reported that $6,500.00 has been budgeted for this service. On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Schutte, statement in the amount of $7~773.93 was approved, and payment authorized; the difference between the budgeted amount and actual cost to be transferred from the Council Contingency Fund. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. PARKSITE NEGOTIATIONS: Mr. Geisler reported on negotiations with Savanna School District for lease of five acres for parksite purposes~ and further reported terms of said lease. The Council indicated their agreement to the reported terms of the lease~ and authorized the City Attorney to proceed accordingly. AGREFJ~ENT: Unilateral contract submitted by owner of property (Sammy Lee Swim- ming School - 2511 West Lincoln Avenue) for installation of curbs, gutters and sidewalk, was approved and recordation authorized, on motion by Council- man Schutte, seconded by Councilman Krein. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO, 64R-117: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No~ 64R-117 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, AMEND- ING RESOLUTION NO. 64R-67 NUNG PRO TUNG, TO CORRECT A CLERICAL ERROR IN THE DESIGNATION OF VOTING PRECINCT NO. 36. 7537 City Hall~ Anaheim,.Cali£ornla - COUNCIL MINUTES - February lg~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. NOES: COUNCILMEN: Noneo ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMAN: Coons. Mayor Pro Tem Chandler declared Resolution No. 64R-117 duly passed and adopted. INVITATIONS: The following invitations were received by the City Council: (a) Metropolitan Water District Trip, Orange County Water Association (five days), March 17 - 21, 1964~ (b) City of La Habra Dedication of Fire Station No. 2, February 22, 1964. RECESS: Councilman Dutton moved to recess to 7:00 O'Clock P.M. Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:50 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Coons called the meeting to order. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Noneo PRESENT: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidto INVOCATION: Rabbi Tofield, of Temple Beth Emet, gave the invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Coons ted the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PUBLIC HEARING~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 525: Submitted by Earl H. Dahlman, requesting permission to establish a service station on property presently zoned R-A, located at the northeast corner of Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist Street (2541 East Lincoln Avenue)o The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1014, Series 1963-64~ granted said conditional use permit, subject to the follow- ing conditions: 1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 57 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Sunlis't Street for street widening purposes. 2o That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Lincoln Avenue for street widening purposes. 3. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Sunkist Street and Lincoln Avenue, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage £ aclu. tries, or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer~ and that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 4. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot~ along Sunkist Street and Lincoln Avenue, for street lighting purposes. 5. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file in the office of the Director o£ Public Works, prior to final building inspection. 6. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the Commission may grant. 7538 City Hall, Anaheim, .California - COUNCIL MINUIES - February 18~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M. 7. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim~ marked "Exhibit Nos. 1, 2~ 3 and 4", and further that subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with adopted Service Station Mini- mum Site Development Standards, provided that stone or masonry materials shall be used for the exterior walls, that a shake roof shall be con- structed, as stipulated by the petitioner, and that revised elevations incorporating said materials shall be subject to the approval of Development Review prior to issuance of a building permit. 8. That at such time as the orange trees on the rear portion of subject property are removed that any plan for the development of said portion of subject property other than black top shall be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Planning Commission prior to the issuance of a building permit° At the request of Councilman Schutte, review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered by the City Council and public hearing scheduled~ Mro Kreidt noted the location of the property~ the zoning existing and pending developments in the immediate area. He summarized the hearing held before the City Planning Commission~ and advised that no one appeared in opposition~ Reference was made to Exhibit No. 5 of Planning Study No. 38-112-4, previously considered by the City Council, which according to the research of Mro Kreidt was the last action of the City Council concerning this area. Regarding notice of public hearing before the City Plannin9 Commis- sion, Mr. Kreidt reported that the property was posted, and written notices were mailed in excess of 300 feet, because of the relatively undeveloped area. Written protests filed by the following were duplicated, and copies thereof furnished each Council member: Felix Co Kalb George A. Ferguson Anaheim-Sunkist Civic Association Mr. and Mrs. Homer O. Shapiro Additional written protest~ filed by Anaheim-Rio Vista Homeowners Association, received to late to duplicate for Council information, was read in full. Ihe Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent wished to address the Council. Mro Robert Fo Waldron, Attorney representing the applicant~ 2020 North Broadway~ Santa Aha, reported that also present were Mr. 3. $. Difilippo, Real 5state Appraiser, who made a study of this area in regard to this hear- lng, and Mr. Io So Brundige, Property Representative of Standard Oil Company, and Mr. R~ Co Runion, Engineer for Standard Oil Company, who were present to answer any technical questions relative to the proposed use. Mr. Waldron advised that subject property was a portion of approxi- mately twenty acres, on which there is the family residence, and the balance of the parcel is presently being used as a citrus grove° Mr. Waldron reported that the State Division o£ Highways is presently negotiating for the acquisition of 8.411 acres of the total parcel for a freeway, which will cut through the approximate center area between Sunkist and Rio Vista Streets~ that an off-ramp is planned approximately 125 feet from the corner of Sunkist Street and Lincoln Avenue, with Lincoln Avenue designed to 9o under the freeway; further, the State condemnation includes all of the Lincoln Avenue frontage, with the exception of this 120 feet. Reference was made to the service station use approved at the intersection of Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street~ and the traffic count taken approximately last April of Rio Vista Street, Sunkist Street and Lincoln Avenue. Mr. Waldron stated that in comparing these two locations, there was more residential use both north and south of Lincoln Avenue on Rio Vista Street than on Sunkist Street. 7539 City Hail, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 18, 1964, 1:30 P.M. Mr~ Waldron reported that, according to his information, the worst type of planning adjacent to a freeway would be any residential use. In rebuttal to some of the objections and statements contained in letters of protest filed, Mr. Waldron was of the opinion that many of the statements were hearsay, without any real evidence. Regarding past action on subject property approximately one and one-half years ago, when the area was County territory, in his opinion it was not pertinent to the issue before the City Council~ He further reported that the application was for a var- lance, which completely differs from this application, and that the former application never came before the City Council. In conclusion, Mr. Waldron called attention to the fact that with the construction of the freeway, subject property will be an isolated parcel of property; that both streets will be widened, which will compensate for any addizional traffic generated by this use, and that the highest and best use of the property would be a service station use, taking into considera- tion the imposition of the freeway, and the commercial developments that have taken place on both sides of subject property. Mro Waldron presented a petition containing forty-one signatures of property owners or residents within close proximity of the property, favoring said conditional use permit. In answer to Councilman Schu%te~s question concerning devaluation of residential property adjacent to a service station use, Mr. Waldron advised that the majority of his practice was in the evaluation of real estate in connection with condemnation cases; and according to his exper- ience, there is no evidence that this use would devalue property. Mr~ Difliippo, 1007 North Broadway, Santa Ana, Real Estate Appraiser, reported that based on his investigation and studies, the highest and best use of the southwest corner of the Dahlman property would be a service station dse. Mro Difilippo referred to a County road map of the area, the principal streets in the area outlined in orange, residential developments noted in blue, undeveloped property noted in light green, and the Dahlman property noted in dark green. He advised that his study along Lincoln Avenue began in an area near the Newport Freeway, and extended westerly to the Orange CounZ¥ limits; that except for the immediate residential develop- ment next to the Dahlman property, nowhere are there single family residen- tial developments fronting on Lincoln Avenue. Yhe general use is commercial or multiple family use. Mr. Difllippo further advised that the study included the homes immediately west of subject property (Tract No. 2490) including the average size and value, the three homes fronting on Lincoln Avenue presently for sale, and the transition presently takin9 place on State College Boulevard, and the value of these homes for commercial use, as compared to residential use; study of zoning actions in the area, and consideration.given to the fact that Rio Vista Street dead-ends at Wagner Street, and future highway development will. cu't off Rio Vista at the North, whereas Sunkist will be taken over the Riverside Freeway into the north industrial area~ thereby converting traffic from Rio Vista Street to Sunkist Street. Mr. Stubbs, 502 Rio Vista Street, advised that he was the closest resident to the Mobi19as Station on the corner of Rio Vista Street and Lincoln Avenue, and in his oplnlon, the station had not decreased the value of his property; that recently two offers have been made to purchase his property for an amount substantially more than he had paid for it. Mr~ Waldron advised that 'they would be willing to submit their plans to the Planning Commission, or any other Architectural body of the City~ 7540 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 18, 1964, l:SO P.M. _ Mayor Coons advised that the letters o£ opposition were introduced in evidence~ and asked if there was a spokesman for the group that wished to address the Council. Mr. Gordon McCone, 218 North Normandy Drive, President of Anaheim- Sunkist Civic Association, advised of the City Planning Commission's opposition to the previous County Planning Commission application in July of 1962. He further advised that it was their understanding that the Conditional Use Permit 9ranted by the Planning Commission for service station use of the property was subject to certain restrictive measures. Although they appreciated the restrictive measures taken, they could not understand the reasons for granting the permit when they vigorously opposed it in the past. In their opinion, conditions have not materially changed in favor of Mr. Dahlman's request; in fact, they felt the conditions were enhanced for the local home owners by the addition of another residential tract con- raining eighty-three homes; further, there was reason to believe that homes of comparable value could be constructed on the Dahlman property. Mr. McCone felt there was documentary evidence to show that moderately priced homes adjacent to freeways sell as well as similar homes in other areas. Regarding the statement of Mr~ Difilippo concerning homes on arterial highways and their increase in value for commercial use, Mr. McCone noted that no mention was made of the value of the homes immediately behind the converted homes; ~hat the question was, have they increased or decreased. Regarding the State condemnation of all but 120 feet of the Lincoln Avenue frontage, Mr. McCone noted a Plan Study of the City Planning Commission indicating how homes in that area could be constructed on cul-de-sac streets that would not front on Lincoln Avenue~ Regarding the statement made that Sunkist-Lincoln intersection was a better intersection than Rio Vista-Lincoln intersection for this user he reported that at the Planning Commission hearing it was noted that after completion of the Riverside Freeway overpass, the traffic will not have access to subject property; further, the service stations located at the intersection of Rio Vista $tree~ and Lincoln Avenue were constructed after commercial development in this area was in existence, and this location, in his opinion, was more in keeping with the general nature of the existing development. Mr. McCone advised of the voting record of the Planning Commissioners on this issue, and noted reasons stated by those voting "No". In conclusion, Mr. McCone noZed the nature of the traffic pattern in the area, and the fact that the granting of the service station use would establish a precedent in the area, creating conditions ~etrimental to the children. He stated that they felt there was a use of the land more compa- tible to the use of the existing area. Mr. Raymond Grant, 2403 East Sycamore Street, member of the Anaheim- Sunkist Homeowners Association, called attention to the fact that the service station is proposed to be located on a high-speed off-ramp of the freeway, constituting a danger to traffic in the deceleration lane, and to all traffic westbound on Lincoln Avenue, by left-hand turns into the service station site, subjecting all citizens to an unnecessary hazard. Mr. Earl Butcher, 2310 Alden Avenue, President of East Anaheim Civic Association, addressed the Council in support of position stated by Mr. McCone, and also in support of the General Plan, as it pertains to their area. In his opinion, the service station use would establish a precedent for development of vacant property, which is a concern to their association. He thereupon requested the use be denied~ as ~hey felt it definitely was not a desirable location for a service station. 7541 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 18~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M. Dr. Howard Garber~ 303 North Sunkist Street, addressed the Council in agreement with expressions made by the opposition. Dr. Garber advised that his letter sent to the City Council was sent prior to his knowledge of any hearings on this matter. He further advised that this was ±he second time this issue has been considered, and wondered how many times this could be considered, maintaining the same concern of the residents. Me called attention to a similar application {or the intersection of La Palma Avenue and Sunkist Street, which was denied because of the ctoss pro×imity of the school, and was of the opinion that this locatlon was essentially the same considering the proposed park to be built in the immediate future. Dr. Gather advised that there was no commercial development on Lincoln Avenue from State College Boulevard to Rio Vista Street, and the granting of this use would be spot zoning. He asked what was proposed for the adjoining area, and felt there was a good possibility of the extension o£ commercial development. He called attention to the fact that at the hearing before the Orange County Planning Commission and Board of Super- visors, and with the knowledge of the proposed freeway, the requested use was denied. Councilman Dutton advised Dro Garber that upon receipt of his letter dated 3anuary 6, t964, concerning the notice of public hearing, he personally inspected the property and found said notice posted. Dfc Garber advised that when he inspected the site, he found that no notice was posted. Mr. Francis Lo Ricker, 2459 Cas{ Lincoln Avenue, felt that if there is to be a change in zoning, it should apply to the entire Lincoln Avenue frontage, and suggested a meeting of property owners on Lincoln Avenue to determine the wishes concerning zoning; that under the present circumstances, he would be in opposition %o said application unless it would apply to other properties along Lincoln Avenue. Mr~ Sam Ca!aronel!o, 2449 East Paradise Road, referred to a County Sectional Map 12-4-10, Exhibit A, wherein the location of the station was shown at the corner of 'the property. Mro Caiaronello asked what the use would be on the balance of 'the property. Mayor Coons replied that any subsequent use of the property would require application before the City Planning Commission for a different use. Mr. C~ C~ Neaty', 502 Stehly, member of the Anaheim-Rio Vista Homeowners Association, and resident in close proximity to the service sta- tion located on the corner of Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street, advised that the light from said service station illuminated the bedrooms of their home. Mr~ Nea].y noted thai the report of the appraiser omitted any reference to 'the freeway~ and regarding traffic, the majority of the traffic on Sunkist Street consists of residents of that area. Others will travel the freeway~ when constructed. Further, he felt certain that offers to purchase Mro giubbs~ property were not £or resident{al use o£ the property. Regarding the requirement of a block wall, he noted the same requirement was made for the service station site located at Rio Vista Street and Lincoln Avenue, and thai after a full year, the wall has not been constructed. He stated ~hat if this zoning is permitted, they would request that none of the conditions be waived. Mr. Nealy referred to the commercial spot zoning along State College Boulevard, which was a possibility along Lincoln Avenue, and reported that the commercial spot zoning along State College Boulevard commenced with service stations located at the intersection, and that when this occurs, the buffer normally required between business and residential is removed~ making the second row cf homes less desirable~ 7542 ¢.~2y Hall, Anahelm~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 18~ 1964~ 1:30 P.M. At the request of the City Council, Mr. Kreidt explained the pro- posed ;treet pattern for both Rio V&sta and Sunkist Streets. Mayor Coons was of the opinion that a good cross section of evidence had been submitted, and thereupon declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-118: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-11g granting Cond[~&onal Use Permit No. 525~ subject to the recommendations of the Clty Planning Commissiono Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CIIY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 525. On roll call the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler and Coons. NOES: COUNCILMEN: Schutte and Krein. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None~ The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-118 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-73: Submitted by Herman H. Bruns, requesting a change of zone from R-A to R-l, property located on the west side of West Street~ approximately 223 feet south of Santa Aha Street (525 South West Street). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1028, Series 1963-647 recommended said reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1, That sidewalks shall be installed along West Street, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer prior to final building inspection. 2. That a Record of Survey to record the approved division of subject property be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 3. That Condition Noo 2~ above mentioned~ shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof~ or such further time as the City Council may grant. 4. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked "Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2"° Mr. Kreidt noted the location of the property~ and advised that the change proposed would divide one parcel of land into two standard R-1 lots. He summarized the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission~ and further advised that as approved by the City Council, construction is presently under way at the petitioner's own risk. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council either for or against said application~ there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-119: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-119 authorizing preparation of necessary Ordinance~ changing the zone as requested~ subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIIY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (63-6z~-V3 - R-l) 7543 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUIES - February 18, 1964~ 1:30 P.M. On roll call ~he foregoing Resolution No. 64R-119 was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. COUNCILMEN: None. COUNCILMEN: None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-119 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-74 AND VARIANCE NO. 1618: Submitted by Gall Vary, requesting a change of zone from R-2 to R-3, and waiver of garage requirement ~o permit the construction of four garages instead of five, property briefly described as located on the south side of Broadway, approximately 130 feet west of Bush Street (916 East Broadway). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1029, Series 1963-64, recommended said reclassification subject to the following conditions: 1. That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent upon the granting of a Variance~ 2. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Broadway, for tree planting purposes. 3. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked "Exhibit Nos. 1 through 4"'. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1030, Series 1963-64, 9ranted Variance No~ 1618, subject to the followin9 conditions: lo That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 2. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspection~ 3o That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassifi- cation No. 63-64-74. 4. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked "Exhibit Nos. 1 through 4". Mr~ Kreidz noted the location of the property and the zoning and use in the immediate area,, He summarized the evidence submitted to the City Planning Commission, advisin9 that no one appeared in opposition, and that the City Planning Commission was of the opinion that the requested use would be the highest and best use of the property, The Mayor asked if' anyone wished to address the Council either for or against said application, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Mr. Vary' made his presence known for the purpose of answering Council questions. RESOLUTION NO, 64R-1~0: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 64R-120 authorizing, preparation of necessary Ordinance, changing" the zone as requested subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF '[HE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND 'THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (63-64-74 - R-3) 7544 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 18, 1964, 1:30 P.M. On roll call the foregoing Resolution No. 64R-120 was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: button, Chandler, $chutte, Krein and Coons. NOES: COUNCILMEN: None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-120 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-121: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 64R-121 9rantin9 Variance Noo 1618 in accordance with the City Plannin9 Commission's recommendations. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1618, On roll Gall the foregoing resolution was duly passed and adopted by the £ollowing vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: button, Chandler, Schutte, Kreln and Coons. NOES: COUNCILMEN: None. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None, The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-121 duly passed and adopted. APPOINTMENTS - CITY pLANNING CO~ISSION: On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Chandler, Mr~ Herbert I. Perry and James A. Sides were reappointed members of the Anaheim City Planning Commission for the ensuing term. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ~DJOURNMENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn to February 19, 1964, 7:00 P.M. for the purpose of holding a Public and General Discussion on the proposed Anaheim City Charter, as recommended by the City Charter Committee, and also moved waiver of further notice of said adjournment. Councilman $chutte seconded the motion, MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 8:55 P.M. SIGNED: ~. -~ City Clerk City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 19, 1964, 7:00 P.M. ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING - ANAHEIM CITY COUNCIL - FEBRUARY 19, 1964, 7:00 P.M. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. PRESENT: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT: Fred Sorsabal. CITY ATTORNEY; Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. FINANCE DIRECTOR: Douglas K. Ogden. Mayor Coons called the meeting to order. Mayor Coons welcomed those present, and explained that the informal public discussion was scheduled to hear and receive any suggested changes that might be made, or might be incorporated in the Charter proposed for the City of Anaheim by the Anaheim Citizens' Charter Study Committee, a Committee appointed by the City Council for this purpose.