1964/08/117989
CSty Ha~l. Anaheim, G~lifQrnia -.GOUNC.IL MINUTES ' Auqus~
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT= COUNCILMEN= Pebley, Schutte an Krein.
ABSENT= COUNCILMEN= Dutton and Chandler.
PRESENT= ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER= Robert Dsvis.
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY= Furman Roberts.
CITY CLERK= Dene M. Williams.
CITY ENGINEER= James P. Maddox,
ASSOCIATE PLANNER= Ronald Grudzinski.
The City Clerk of the City of Anaheim called the meeting to
order for the purpose of electing an Acting Mayor and Mayor Pro Tempore,
due to the absence of Mayor Chandler and Mayor Pro Tempore Dutton,
Councilman Krein moved that Councilman Schu~te be acting Mayor
and Mayor Pro Tempore for this meeting. Councilman Pebley seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
~.INUTE.S~ On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Pebley, minutes
of the Anaheim City CounciI regular meeting heId July 28, 1964, and adjourned
reguIar meeting held JuIy 31, 196a, were approved. MOTION CARRIED.
I,N~r, RODb~TION= Councilman Pebley, Judge representing'the City at the Queen
Contest for "~iss Willow Park", which was sponsored by the Park and
Recreation Department~ introduced Queen, JOdy Feil, age six and one-half,
and one of her Princesses, Claudia "Cricket" Carroll, age six.
Mayor Pro Tem Schutte expressed ~bngratulations of the City
Council to the contest winners and to the Park ~nd Recreation Department~
as sponsors of the contest and boat regatta°
·
~SOL[rrlON No.,.~Rr57~, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-578 for
adoption°
Refer to Resolution Book.
/
A R~SOLUIION OF THE CITY COUR~IL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND
DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF AUGUST 11, 1964.
(WARRANTS NOG 33407 to 33721, both inclusive, totaling $1,218,542o01)
Roll call vote=
AY~S~ COUNCIL~N~ Pebley, Krein and Schutte
NOES= COUNCILM~N= None
ABSENT~ COUNCII3~N~ Dutton and Chandler
Mayor Pro Tem Schutte declared Resolution No. 64R-578 duly
passed and adopted.
~SOLUTION NO, ~R-57~ - AWA~ OF ~ONTRA~I, I~GAL i~VERT!SI~ iO,~,SIDE OITY,
Pursuant to action taken by the City Council at their meeting held August
a, 196~, and upon report and recommendation of the City Clerk and City
Attorney, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 6~R-579 for adoption,
awarding contract for legal advertising for the City of Anaheim required
to be published outside the City~ but within the County of Orange, to the
lowest bidder~ The Placentia Courier.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOW~ST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER WHOSE
BID BEST RESPONDS IN QUALITY, FITNESS AND CAPACITY, FOR ALL LEGAL ADVERTISING
REQUIRED BY LAW TO BE PUBLISH~-D IN A N~WSPAPER OF GENERAL CIRCULATION, PRINTED
AND PUBLISHED OUTSIDE TH~ CITY, BUT IN Tf~E COUNTY OF ORANGE.
Roll call vote=
7990
City Ha!l,.: Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 11, 196~. 1:30
AYES: COUNCILNEN~ Pehley, Krein and Schutteo
NO~S: COUNCII~EN, None~
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN': Dutton and Chandler.
Mayor Pro /em Schutte declared Resolution No. 64R-579 duly passed
and adopted°
p.A.C.IFIC INDEMNITY CONPANY - GE.NE~AL LIABILITY INSURANCE: On repOrt .by the Deputy.
.City Attorney~ the City Attorney was authorized to execute waiver ,f "Non-
Insured Motorist Clause# to the Pacific Indemnity Company General Public
Liability Policy Number LP 10027, on motion hy Councilman Pehley, seconded hy
Councilman Kreino MOTION CARRIFD.
RECLASSIF%C. ATION NO,. 63-64-68 AND VARIANCE NO, 1616: Request by KeYStone Savings
and ~oan Association for clarification as to whether property can be deveto~
in stages under Reclassification No° 63-64-68 and Variance No. 1616~ was con-
tinued from the meeting of August 4, 1964. Condition Nco 2 of Resolution No.
64R-159 required dedication of all vehicular access rights to Fairhaven
Street.
Mr° Sheppard, of Keystone Savings and Loan Association~ advised
that the intent was to remove two houses and immediately develop the two
lots at the southeast corner of Crescent and Fairhaven Streets for parking
purposes, while retaining three parcels on Fairhaven Street south of Crescent
Street for later' development~ in conjunction with expansion of their
facilities°
On the recommendations of the Deputy 'City Attorney, Councilman
Krein moved that development of subject property in stages he approved~ in
accordance with plans and conditions of Reclassification No. 63-64-68 and
Variance No° 1616~ and that temporary access permits he authorized on the
southerly three lots facing Fairhaven Street, being lots 4, 5 and 6, south
of crescent Street~ Councilman Pehle¥ seconded said motion° MOTION CARRIED.
P:UBLIC HEARI.NG - ABANDONMRNT~ Public hearing was held on proposed abandonment of
a portion of an alley located north of Anaheim BOulevard~ running westerly
from Lemon Street, pursuant to Resolution Nco 64R-511~ duly published in the
Anaheim Bulletin July 30, 1964, and notices thereof posted in accordance
with lawo
Mr° Ronald Grudzinski called attention to Area Development Plan
No. 10, posted on the east wall of the Council Chamher, and prepared in con-
junction with Reclassification No° 63-64-125 (Gonzales property~ approved
for C-2 zoning hy the City Council, August 4, 196~)o He noted the location
of subject alley on said Area Development Plan map~ advising that properties
fronting on Anaheim Boulevard and Lemon Street are developing for commercial
purposes°
~tro Grudzinski also noted a method hy which the commercial prop-
erty could he served hy a secondary access, and advised that it was the
recommendation of the Traffic Engineer that said abandonment he accomplished
in order to 'decrease vehicular conflict caused hy the close proximity of the
intersection of Lemon Street and Anaheim Boulevard,
Mayor Pro Tem Schutte asked if anyone wished to address the City
Council~ in opposition to said abandonment, there being no response, declared
the public hearing closed°
~BSQ~UTION NO,.. 64R-§8Q: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution NOd 64R-580 for
adoption, abandoning a portion of subject alley~ in accordance with City
Staff recommendations°
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THE VACATION
AND ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF AN ALLEY AND AN EASRMENT FOR ALLEY PURPOSES
UPON, OVER~ ACROSS AND ALONG THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY~ AND
RESERVING ALL OTHRR RIGHTS AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASRMENTS, AND EASFJ~ENTS FOR
SEWER LINES, STORM DRAINS AND CATCH BASINS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF
INGRESS AND EGRESS ON, OVER, ALONG~ ACROSS AND THROUGH SAID PROPERTY.
Roll ~!! vote=
7991
Ci$.y Hall, Anaheim, California -OOUNGIL MINUTES - August 11,..19.64, .!.~.$0
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Kret~ and $ch'utte.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENI: GOUNGIL~EN: Dutton and Ghandlero
The Mayor Pro Ism declared Resolution No. 64R-580 duly passed
and adopted.
~UBLIC HEARING - ABA,NDO~NMENT: 'Public hearing was held on.proposed abandonment
of a po'rti'on of an alley located north of Anaheim Boulevard, running
easterly from Parry Street to North-South alley, pursuant to ReSo.lu~ion No,
64R-512, duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin 3uly 30, 1964, and notices
thereof posted in accordance with law,
In addition to the presentation during public hearing on proposed
Abandonment 64-6A, Mr~ Grudzinski reported that property to:the north of
the North-South alley~ between Parry and Lemon Streets (south of Romneya
Drive) was acquired by the City of Anaheim for municipal purposes.
Mro Davis noted report from the City Engineer~ recommending that
subject portion of the alley not be abandoned, as the alley is needed to'
provide circulation in connection with the parking lots serving the La
Palma Stadium and the Municipal Court, as well as for rear access to the
commercial developments and remaining residential properties~
Mayor Pro Tem Schutte asked if anyone wished to address the City
Council for or against the proposed abandonment, there being no response~
declared the public hearing closed°
RESOLUIION NO, 64R-581~ Councilman Krein offered Resolution Nee 64R-581~
for adoption~ denying abandonment of subject alley.
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDERING THAT
PORTIONS OF ALLEYS AND EASEMENTS FOR ALLEY PURPOSES UPON, OVER, ACROSS
AND ALONG THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY NOT BE ABANDONED. (North
of Anaheim Boulevard~ easterly from Parry Street)
Roll call vote~
AYES: COUNCILMRN: Pebley~ Krein and Schutte.
NOES: COUNCIL~EN~ None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN~ Dutton and Chandler.
Mayor Pro Tem Schutte declared Resolution No. 64R-581 duly passed
and adopted.
~ROP.~OSAL - LITTLE MISS AMERIQA PAGE.AN!.: Correspondence dated July 28, 1964
from J. Orion Brunk, Executive Director~ was submitted for Council consid-
eration, proposing that the City of Anaheim host the first annual Little
Miss America Pageant for girls between the ages of five and ten years~ to
be held in November of 1964o
Mr. Brunk briefly outlined the va~ous requirements which would
be made of the City~ and the benefits which the City would receive in return.
~ayor Pro Tem Schutte invited Comments and questions from the
audience.
In answer to a question of Mr. George E. Strachan~ of the Anaheim
Chamber of Commerce, Mro Brunk advised~ that there-would be two or three
shows during the pageant for which tickets would be sold.
In answer to the Assistant City Manager's question, Mr° Brunk
reported that the costs to the City for remote telecasting would be approxi-
mately $15~000~ plus providing rooms and meals for fifty contestants and
mothers~ and other incidental costs of hosting the pageant$ these expenses
to be paid either by the City or interested organizations.
7992
City.Hall, AnaJaeim, C~lifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 11, 1964· 1:30
MaY°r Pro Iem $chutte asked .how funds realized fr°m sponsors of
the pageant would be used° . .
Mr. Brunk advised that the cost of producing such an event was
approximately One and One-Half-Million Dollars, and he pointed out that
Anaheim, as "Host City#, would be responsible only for hostin9 expenses and
the cost of the remote telecast.
Mr. Douglas-Farley, of the Anaheim Area Visitor and Convention
Bureau, reported that the Executive Committee of the Bureau had discussed
the proposal, and it was felt that an open.meeting with the City Council
should be held to explore all facets which are involved~ He stressed that
to host the pageant would constitute a complete community activity, and
suggested all service clubs, as well as the Chamber of Commerce, he included
at the suggested meeting.
Mr' Brunk advised that an early decision is imperative, as the
program is presently being sold~
Mr. Ron Cline, of the Junior Chamber of Commerce, agreed that the
hosting of the pageant should he a complete community project, and that a
meeting was necessary to further explore the proposal and determine the
community interest~
The foregoing matter was continued to the evening session of this
meeting, for further consideration by all members of the City Council°
(See page 8010)
PROPC~ED ABANDONMENT: Proposed abandonment of an easement for alley purposes
(adjacent to dedicated alley east of Bangor Way, Tract No. 3912), was
scheduled this date for adoption of a resolution, setting a date for public
hearing before the City Council.
The foregoing matter was ordered off agenda~ to be re-scheduled
at a later date.
R~T - GOSPEL TENT~ Request Was submitted by the Fountain of Living Water
Church, Wa Spaulding, Th°D, Pastor, for permission to erect a tent on un-
developed property, located at 2663 West Lincoln Avenue, for a revival
gospel campaign, tentatively scheduled for August 16 through October 18,
1964o
Mayor Pro Tem Schutte asked if the applicant was present and
wished to address the City Council°
Mrs° Dorothy Flinner, representing the applicant, reported that
this is a recognized religious corporation, however they have no church at
the present time.
Mr~ Davis noted reports from the Planning and Police Departments,
and advised that the tent would have to he in compliance with specifications
of the State Fire Marshall's Regulations, and adequate sanitary facilities
would be required.
Council discussion was held regarding the proximity of subject
property to single family homes on the north, and at the conclusion thereof,
Councilman Krein moved that request by the Fountain of Living Water Church
to erect a tent be scheduled for public hearing before the City Council on
September 8, 1964, 7:00 PoMe Councilman Peble¥ seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIRDo
INTRODUCT. ION$ Sergeant Harold Bastrup introduced nineteen new Anaheim Police
Officers, and advised that attendance at a City Council meeting was a part
of the police orientation program,
7993
H~ll, Anaheim,. Cglifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqu~t 11, 1964,..1~30
,, i , i - ~ L ,l~, 111 ,,, ,I Il i, , , , i , , i i i i i ....
~RIVATE p, ATROL PERMIT -ACE ,QUARD SER, VIC~,. Application by'Frank Jeseph~Hend~ix,
Ace Guard Service, for permission to operate a private guard service, fur~
nishing guards for the protection of .housing tract construction .sites in the
City of Anaheim, was submitted and granted, subject to the provisions
Chapter 4°60 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, recommended hy the Chief of
Police~ on motion hy COuncilman Krein, seconded hy Councilman Pehley.
MOTION CARRIED°
SIGN RBOUEST: Application submitted by Rex L. Hodges Realty, requesting permis-
sion to erect a free-standing sign at 2666 West Lincoln Avenue, was reviewed
by the City Council together with reports from the Building and Planning
Departments.
Mr. Cal Ross, 1940 South Anaheim Boulevard, advised that the
requested sign was not placed within the center ten per cent of the property
as it would interfere with the driveway~
On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Pebley, said
sign permit was granted, subject to no projection over the property line,
and further subject to the provision that all lighting be reflected away
from residential properties. MOTION CARRIED.
IRACT NO~ 5260 .(RECLASS, IFIOATION NO, 62-63-113 AND_ CONDITIONAL U, SE,,,,P,E, RMIT',NO' 42:3,),
Request of E. Go Warmington to rescind Council acceptance of streets in
Tract No. 5260 and exonerate bonds and return unused fees, was suhmittedo
The City Engineer recommended, should the request be granted, the
following requirements he made conditions thereof~
1o That the original title sheet of the tract map he returned to the City
Engineer and the signatures of the City Clerk and City Engineer he re-
moved~
2. That checking fees in the amount of $252.00 be paid~
3, That a portion of the tract fees in the amount of $3~519.02 be refunded.
(Street trees - $167.80~ sewer - $3,086°65, and water for compaction -
$264.57.)
4~ That Continental Casualty Company Bond No° 15 3 3202 be exonerated, after
completion of Conditions Nos° 1 and 2.
The City Engineer further recommended that should approval o£ said
final map he rescinded, certain amendments he made to Resolutions Nos°
63R-519~ 64R-111, and 64R-217~ pertaining to Reclassification No. 62-63-113~
and Resolutions Nos. 63R-520~ 63R-840 and 64R-218 pertaining to Conditional
Use Permit Nco 423°
On motion by Councilman Pebley., seconded by Councilman Krein,
action taken by the City Council April 1~ 196~, approving Tract Map No,
5260~ was rescinded~ subject to the conditions recommended by the City Engi-
neer. MOTION CARRI~D~
On motion by Councilman Krein~ seconded by Councilman Pehleyj
amendments to Reclassification No. 62-63-113 and Conditional Use Permit No,
423j in accordance with City Engineer's recommendations, were authorized,
upon final termination of Tract No. 5260. MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 63-64-$1 (VARIANCE .N0...1602):. Request of Raymond G. Spehar
was submitted, requesting an extension of one year after final building
inspection to Condition No° 1 of Ordinance No° 1956, with reference to
construction of two-foot block wall on the southerly property line.
Report from the City Planning Department was submitted, recommend-
ing the applicant be required to construct the block wall, prior to final
building inspection. ,
It was moved by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Pebley,
that compliance with Condition No. 1 be prior to final building inspection.
MOTION CARRIED°
7994
Cit. v Hall. Anaheim, CalifQrnia - COUNCIL MINUTFS. - Auqust 11, 1964, 1:30 P,M..,
R...~GLASSIFIGATION NO~. 60-61,6~ - WAIVER OF SIDEWALK AND EXTSNSION OF TI~EI Request
of RObert Lo Payan, dated.July 239 1964, for six months extension of time to
improvement bond posted pursuant to Reclassification No~ 60-61-62~ amendment
to-Condition No. 3, Resolution No. 6764~ to allow existing roll-type curb to
remain; and in addition, clarification of said Condition No. 3 to allow
existing asphalt walkway on La Palma Avenue, was submitted.
Mro Payan was present, and advised that all curbs in subject area
are of the roll-type, and that the building on subject property was compat-
ible to others in the neighborhood.
The City Hngineer reported the general area is developed with
roll-type curb and 9utter, and no immediate replacement program is proposed$
and he recommended the following:
la That Condition Nco 3 of Resolution Nco 6764 be amended to read, "That
the sidewalks shall be installed along Sequoia Avenue, as required by
the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifica-
tions on file in the office of the City Engineer. The sidewalks shall be
six inches thick at driveway locations."
2o That said Condition Nco 3 be clarified to show that a concrete sidewalk
is not required along La Palma Avenue at this time.
At the conclusion of Council discussion, Councilman Krein moved
that temporary waiver of sidewalk requirements on La Palma Avenue be
granted, and that the amount of the bond posted be reduced accordingly,
said bond to be for a period of six months° Councilman Pebley seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED°
~F-CLASS~F~TION ~0., 63-64-10: Excerpt from the City Planning Commission minutes
of their meeting held 3uly 8, 1964, recommending that R-3 zoning be final-
ized on Portion "A' of property described in Reclassification No. 63-64-10~
was submitted and reviewed by the City Council.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Krein, the
City Attorney was instructed to prepare necessary ordinance changing the
zone of Portion "A", Reclassification No. 63-64-10, to R-3. MOTION CARRIED°
FINAL MAP, TRACT NO, 5495:. Developer, Ardmore Development Company$ tract located
west of Euclid Street and north of Crescent Avenue, and contains two R-3
lots. (Reclassification No. 60-61-86)
The City Engineer reported that final map conforms substantially ~
with the tentative map previously approved, required fees have been paid, and
no bond was required~ as all improvements were bonded for and constructed
under Tracts Nos. 46189 4619 and 4621. He recommended approval of said map,
subject to City Attorney approval of Covenants~ Conditions and Restrictions.
On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley
moved Final Map, Tract No~ 5495, be approved~ subject to the approval by the
City Attorney of the executed Covenants~ Conditions and Restrictions.
Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED°
TR~£T NO. 5.403 (RECLASSIFICATION NO. 62-63.-$~5 AND CONDITIONAL USE. pERMIT NO, 313),
Property located on the west side of Knott Avenue, approximately 648 feet
south of Lincoln Avenue (ten R-3 lots).
The City Clerk reported that a verbal complaint was received
relative to two-story apartment construction within 150 feet of R-1 property
located westerly of subject property in the City of Buena Park, and that a
temporary stop order has been issued to allow investigation.
In summarizing the zoning history of subject property9 it was
reported that the property was zoned R-3, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2004,
and Conditional Use Permit No. 313 was granted in conjunction with the R-3
zonin9~ Development to he in accordance with plans marked "Revision 1",
which provided for 150 foot distance between the R-1 development to the West
and the two-story construction. Subsequently, Tract No. 5403 was finalized.
and revised plans marked "Revision No. 2" approved, which permitted all two-
story construction,
7995
Oitv Ha~,l, Anaheim, Calif0rni~ - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqu,~t ,~,1, 1964, ,1~,30 P,~M,a,_
The Mayor Pro Tem asked if a representative of the developer was
present and wished to address the City Council. .
Mro A. R. McDaniel, of McDaniel Engineering, representing the
developer, briefly reported on the history of the tract, and advised that
it was their understanding that the granting o£ Conditional Use Permit No0
313 waived the height limitations. . _
Mro David Co Maddox, representing Dr° Dean, developer~ explained
that Tract No. 5403 was considered by the City Council in conjunction with
Conditlonal Use Permit No. 313, although said conditional use permit was
requested by the original omuer, together with Reclassification No. 62-63-35~1
that the revised plans showing two-story buildings on the entire property
were approved by the City Councilo
The interpretation received by Mro Maddox's office was that the
development which is pr'esently under construction was within the provisions
of the zoning granted on the property. He further advised that they have
proceeded in good faith~ and that the present plans had accompanied the
tract map during the processing of the map~ had this development been
disapproved, the tract would have been designed differently°
The Deputy City Attorney briefed minutes of the City Council con-
cerning the approval of the two sets of revised plans. He noted that the
Anaheim Municipal Code requires that a waiver of any requirement must he
specifically set forth in a conditional use permit, and therefore, could
not he considered approved hy the approval of revised plans.
Mr. Robert Sheer, 6873 Via Norte Circle, Buena Park, addressed
the City Council advising of his objections to two-story construction
within 150 feet of his R-1 property, west of subject property. He reviewed
the discussion held on February 5, 1963, during the public hearing on
subject reclassification and conditional use permit, particularly pertain-
ing to the protection his property was assured through the conditions
applied to said applications°
Mr° Sheer further advised that the four two-story buildings are
presently under construction within 150 feet of the residential properties,
which, if allowed, would encroach upon the privacy of his property and that
of his neighbors, and requested enforcement of the 150 foot limitation for
two-story construction, as set forth in the Anaheim Municipal Code.
At the conclusion of the discussion, the issue was ordered deferred
to the evening session of this meeting, to allow further investigation during
the interim period°
Later in the meeting (during the evening session),-and in accord-
ance with the request of MrQ Maddox, Councilman Krein moved that Council
consideration on Tract No. 5403 he continued to September 1~ 1964, 7:00
O'Clock PoMo Councilman Schutte seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED°
C.I!Y. PLANNING .COMMISSION I. TF~.S: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at
their meeting held 3uly 20, 1964 pertaining to the following applications,
were submitted for City Council information and consideration:
CONDITIONAL .US~ PEPJ~IT NO, .595:. Submitted by Herman. E. and Leilani Milbrat,
requesting permission to maintain~ not to exceed ten collie show dogs on
property presently zoned R-A~ located on the west side of Dale Avenue,
approximately 476 feet south of Crescent Avenue (519 North Dale Avenue).
Denied, pursuant to City Planning Commission's Resolution No,
1269, Series 1964-65.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 596 (TRACT. NO, .5305 -.RECLASSIFICATION NO,
62-63-.1.31, CONDITIONAL USE PHRMITS NOS.. 440 AND 441): Submitted by South-
east Mortgage Company, requesting permission to convert existing 216 apart-
ment unit project into a 432 unit residential motel/hotels R-3 property
briefly described as located on the south side of Orangewood Avenue, approx-
imately '260 feet east of Harbor Boulevard. (General Plan Amendment No. 28,
filed in conjunction with subject application, scheduled for public hearing
before the City Council August 18, 196~)
7996
City Hal,1~ Anahe,,im, California - COUNCIL M!,NUTES - Auqust 11, 1964, 1~,,30 p,M,
'- Conditional Use permit Nco 596 was 9ranted, pursuant t°City
Planning Commission's Resolution Nco 1276, Series 1964-65, subject to
conditions o
CONDITIONAL USE PER~IT NO, 597; Submitted by Marion Schlund Lindsay,
requesting permission to establish a picture projection theatre with related
shops, displays, and incidental food services, serving customers and guests,
and further requesting waiver o£ 35 foot height limitation; R-A property
located on the east side of West Street, approximately 330 feet south of Ball
Road.
Granted, pursuant to City Planning Commission's Resolution No.
1278~ Series 1964-65~ subject to conditions.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 598: Submitted by Adeline Fechter~ et al~
requesting permission to establish a miniature golf course, trampoline
center~ drive-in restaurant~ arcade and associated activities~ C-1 property
located adjacent to a service station site on the southeast corner of
Magnolia and La Palma Avenues° (General Plan Amendment No° 29~ filed in
conjunction with subject application, scheduled for public hearing August
18, 1964, before the City Council°)
Granted9 pursuant to City Planning Commission's Resolution No.
1270, Series 1964-65, subject to conditions.
QOND~.TIONAL USE PERMI. T NO, 599~ Submitted by Pacific Midwest Development
Company, requesting permission to establish a Hofhrau~ with on-sale beer;
M-1 property located at the northeast corner of Ball Road and Claudina
Place (201 East Ball Road)°
Granted9 pursuant to City Planning Commission's Resolution No.
1275~ Series 1964-65~ subject to conditions°
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 600: Submitted by J~ E~ and Callie Ac Pruett,
requesting permission to establish a private elementary school in an exist-
ing residence; R-1 property located at the northwest corner of Lincoln
Avenue and Evergreen Street (103 North Evergreen Street)°
Granted~ pursuant to City Planning Commission's Resolution No°
1274, Series 1964-659 subject to conditions°
VARIANCE NO~ 1649: Submitted by Millard and Irma Joul~ Shutchi and Hatsuko
Kusaka~ and To Sato and Akira Sato, requesting waiver of minimum required
front and rear yards; R-A property located on the north side of Ball Road,
approximately 338 feet west of Beach Boulevard (3047 West Ball Road)°
The City Planning Commission9 pursuant to ReSolution No. 1268,
Series 1964-65, granted Variance No° 1649 for waiver of minimum required
front yard only. Petitioner withdrew request for waiver of minimum rear
yard requirements~ upon being informed said waiver was unnecessary.
No further action was taken by the City Council on the above noted
Variance and Conditional Use Permit applications°
RECLASSIF!CA!ION NO~ 6~-63-131 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMI!S NOS~ 440 AND 441:
Property located on the south side of Orangewood Avenue~ east of Harbor
Boulevard o
The City Planning Commission's recommendation to terminate
Reclassification No~ 62-63-131 and Conditional Use Permits Nos. ~40 and 441,
as Conditional Use Permit Nco 596 would nullify the use for which said
applications were 9ranted~ was continued to August 18, 1964, 1:30 P.~o, to allow
the expiration of the twenty-two day appeal period on Conditional Use Permit
Noo 5960
R~F~3LASSIFI.CATION NO, 63-64-94 AND VARIANCE NO, 1628 (TRACT NO, 38.~3): Property
located on the north side of Ball Road, approximately 338 feet west of
Beach Boulevard (3047 West Ball Road)°
7997
F
City Hall,.Anahe~, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 11, 1964, 1:30
The City Planning Commi'ssion recommended termination of ReclaSsi-
fication No. 63-64-94 and Variance No. 1628, inasmuch as Finai Map o3 TraCt
Nos 3823, approved by the City Council July 28, 1964~ supersedes, said appli-
cations°
The City Council:continued said~reCommendatiens to August~18~
1964, 1:30 P.M., to allow the'expiration 'Of the twenty-tWo da~ 'appeal period
On Variance No. 1649,.pertainihg to subject proPerty.
FINAL COMPLETION - PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS~ Upon receipt of certification
from the Director of Public Works~ Councilman Krein offered Resolutions Nos.
64R-582 to 64R-586~ both inclusive~ for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
.RE. SOLUTION NO. 64R-582: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL LABOR,
SERVICES AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY TO COMPLETE THE CUTTING AND REMOVAL OF ALL
WEEDS AND RANK GROWTH UPON ALL LOTS AND AREAS WITHIN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
WORK ORDER NO. 419-8~0. (3ohn C, Warner~ dba Commercial Lot Cleaning)
RESOLUTION NO, 64R-585: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT,
LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT, AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPOR-
TATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK
NECESSARY TO CONSTRLET AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO
WIT: INSTALLATION OF FLOODLIGHTING AND POWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS AT THE
STATE COLLEGE AND VERMONT PARKSITE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 30B NOs 811o
(William Re Sherwin~ dba Sherwin Electric Service)
RESOLUTION NO, 64R-~84~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT,
LABOR~ SERVICES~ MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPOR-
TATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER~ AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK
NECESSARY TO CONSTRLET AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO
WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF HARBOR BOULEVARD~ FROM CHESTNUT STREET TO BROADWAY,
IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NOo 8~0. (Re Jo Noble Company)
RESOLUTION NO~ .64R-58~: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT,
LABOR~ SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTA-
TION INCLUDING POWER~ FUEL AND WATER~ AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK
NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO
WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF CITRON STREET, FROM LINCOLN AVENUE TO BROADWAY,
IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NOs 859° (Rs 3~ Noble Company)
RESOLUTION NO~ 64R-586: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT,
LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPOR-
TATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK
NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO
WIT: THE SAVANNA STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM KNOTT AVENUE TO APPROXI-
MATELY 1326 FEET WEST OF KNOTT AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 30B NO.
1281o (Scott Broso Construction)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES~ COUNCILMEN~ Pebley, Krein and Schutteo
NOES: COUNCIINEN, None.
ABSENT: COUNGILMEN: Dutton and Chandler.
Mayor Pro Tem Schutte declared Resolutions Nos. 64R-582 through
64R-586, both inclusive~ duly passed and adopted°
CHANGE ORDER NO, 1 - JOB NO,. 1~78~ On the recommendations of the City Engineer,
Councilman Pebley moved that Change Order No. 1, in the amount of $2,888.56,
consisting o£ extra work in the Dowling Avenue Sewer Improvement, Job No°
1278, be approved° Councilman Krein seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
7998
Ha!l, Anaheim. California - COUNCIL.MINUTeS -.Auaust 11. 1964, 1:30
R~soLUT~ON NO, .64R-587 - 30B NOQ 1278: Upon receipt of certification from the'
· Director of Public Works, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 64R-587
·
for adoption° ·
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING
THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS
AND F~UIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND
WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE
THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE DOWLING AVENU~ SEWER IMPROVE-
MEN/, IN DOWLING AVENLM, FROM APPROXIMATELY 156' NORTH OF ANAHEIM ROAD TO
APPROXIMATELY 174' SOUTH OF PLACENTIA-YORBA BLVD., AND IN ORANGETHORPE AVE.
FRO~ DOWLING AVE. TO 1743' EAST OF DOWLING AVE., IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB
NO. 1278o (Edmond Jo Vadnais)
Roll Call Vote,
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Krein ~and Schutte.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None°
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton andChandlero
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 64R-587 duly passed and
adopted.
RF~O.L~UT!ON NO, 64R-588.- JOB NO, 896, Councilman Krein offered Resolution No.
64R-588 for adoption~
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND
COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF SYCAMORE
STREET, FROM APPROXIMATELY 148 FEET EAST OF ORANGE STREET TO APPROXIMATELY
4 FEET EAST OF ORANGE STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 896~ APPROVING
THE DESIGNS~ PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUC-
TION THEREOF~ AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRLCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETCo ~ AND AUTHORIZING AND DIR-
ECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE
CONSTRLETION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened September 3~ 1964, 2:00 P.M.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Krein and Schutte~
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None°
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler.
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No~ 64R-588 duly passed and
adopted°
RESOLUTION NO, .64R-589 - AWARD OF JOB. NO, .868: On the recommendations of the City
Engineer~ Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-589 for adoption°
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND L~UIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, A~ID PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVFJ~ENT: THE INtPROVEMENT OF THE INTERSECTION AT OLIVE AND ALBERTA
STREETS, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 30B NO. 868. (Griffith Company -
$3,099.80)
adopted.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Krein and Schutte.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton .and Chandler.
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 64R-589 duly passed and
7999
G..ity Hall, Anaheim, .California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auq.u~t .1.1. 1964. 1:30 P.M._
RESOL~ION'NO, 6~.R-.590 - AWARD OP .JOB NO. 5012! On the recommendations of-the
City' Engineer, CoUncilman Pebley of£ered Resolution No. 64R-590 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED
PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT IO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE
FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL
UTILITIES AND TRANSPORIATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORm-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IN~ROVE~ENT.. THE CONSTRUCTION OF A STOPd~ DRAIN IN KATELLA AVENUE, FRC~
WEST STREET TO HASTER STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 5012,
(Kordick g Son - $295,257~60)
Roll Call Vote..
AYES~ COUNCILMEN~ Pebley, Krein and Schutteo
NOES= COUNCILMEN.t None°
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN, Dutton and Chandler,
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 64R-590 duly passed
and adopted°
QANCELLATIQN OF COUNIY TAXES.~ On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by
Councilman Krein, the Orange County Board of Supervisors was requested to
cancel County taxes on property acquired by the City of Anaheim for
municipal purposes, pursuant to Resolution No~ 64R-506, formerly assessed
to Camille Norman and 3ennie L. Allec, Mary Lou Allec, Camille Allec 3r~
and Lena May Allec~ and Eva Rd Pauchon; deeds recorded July 24, 1964, as
Documents Nos° 2~159, 2~157 and 2~158, in Book No. 71~8 at Pages 601, 591
and 596; Official Records of Orange County, California. MOTION CARRIED,
RESOLUTION NO, 64R-591: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-591 for
adoption°
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT
DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR MUNICIPAL
PURPOSES° (3ose and Pauline Lopez)
Roll Call Vote..
AYES.. COUNCILMEN.. Pebley, Krein and Schutte.
NOES: COUNGI~EN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCII2~EN~ Dutton and Chandler~
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 6~R-591 duly passed
and adopted.
DEEDS OF ~ASEMENT: Councilman Krein offered Resolutions Nos. 64R-592, 64R-593
and 6~R-59~ for adoption°
Refer ~o Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO.~ ~4R-~.~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF IHE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC ROAD AND HIGHWAY PURPOSES IN, ON,
OVER AND ACROSS CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, FROM SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
CON~ANYo
RESQLUTION NO, 64R-593, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR EASEMENTS FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Brookhurst
Gardens~ Inco)
RESOLUTION NO, 6..4R-594: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR EASEMENIS FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY AND PUBLIC UTILIIY
AND OVERHANG PURPOSES° (Edward V. Kalmar, et al)
8OOO
City Ha~..1,. An~heim, Ca!iforpia - COUNCIL~ MINUTES - Auqust 11, 1964, 1:30
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Krein and Schutte.
NOES~ COUNCII3~EN: None°
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN~ Dutton and Chandler.
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolutions Nos. 64R-592~ 64R-593 and
64R-594 duly passed and adopted.
RF~O. LUT~,QN NO~ 6~R-595: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No~ 64R-595 for
adoption°
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTH-
ORIZING THE EXECUIION OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND
SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY GRANTING TO THE CITY A LICENSE TO CONSTRUCT,
MAINTAIN AND USE AN ELECIRIC SUPPLY LINE ACROSS OR ALONG THE PREMISES OF
SAID RAILWAY COMPANY AT OR NEAR THE STATION OF ATWOOD, ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA. (Orangethorpe/LindaVista)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES~ COUNCILMEN= Pebley, Krein and Schutteo
NOES= COUNCILNtEN, None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN= Dutton and Chandler°
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No, 64R-595 duly passed and
adopted°
CORRESPQN~.~ENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on
motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Krein:
ac Richard To Barrett, request concerning Aliso Beach.
bo Letter of appreciation, Roy Eo Heissner, President~ Anaheim City
Employees Credit Union°
Co Opinion of the Public Utilities Commission in the matter of the applica-
tion by the City of Anaheim to construct a City Street across the Right-
of-Way of the Atchison~ Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company and Union
Pacific Railroad at La Palma Avenue°
do Feather River Project Association:
1o California Water Commission Agenda, meeting of August 7, 1964.
2. State Water Quality Control Board Age~da,.meeting of August 5~ 1964,
3° Notice of hearing on effects of San Joaquin Valley drainage,
August 19, 1964o
4. Minutes~ Board of Directors' Meeting, May 22, 1964, and attachments.
5. Newsletter dated 3uly 28, 1964o
MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 2023: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2023 for final
reading°
Refer to Ordinance Book.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18, CHAPTER 18.24,
SECTION 18.24o030 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO R-l, ONE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES. (Area - Rear Yard)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2023 and
having knowledge of the contents thereln~ Councilman Kreln moved the reading
in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion.
MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
Roll Call Vote:
adopted.
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Krein and Schutteo
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler.
Mayor Pro Tem Schutte declared Ordinance No. 2023 duly passed and
8001
City Hall, Anaheim, C~$fornia -CO~NCI. L MINtrrES - Auqust 11, 19.64,. 1:30
ORDINAl5 N0~2024: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2024 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE z%, CHAPTER z~.72, SECTION
4°72.330 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO TAXICABS. (Driver's
License)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No, 2024 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Krein moved the reading
in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion,
MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO, 2025: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance Nco 2025 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (59.-60-39 - C-l)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance Nco 2025 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Krein moved the reading
in full of said Ordinance he waived° Councilman Pehley seconded the motion,
MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NCo 2026: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance Nco 2026 for first
reading°
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (Recla$6ifications Nos. 63-64-126 to
63-64-1389 bot%h inclusive, Initiated by City Planning Commission)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2026 and
having knowledge of the contents therein~ Councilman Krein moved the reading
in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion°
MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 2027: Councilman Krein offered Ordinance No. 2027 for first
reading.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM'MUNI-
CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-141 - C-i)
After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2027 and
having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Krein moved the reading
in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Pebley seconded the motiona
MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED°
LA PAL~A AVENUE EXTENSION - PUBLIC UTILITIES CON~ISSION DECISION: Mr° Furman
Roberts repot'ted on decision by the Public Utilities Commission (P.u.c.)
on the Atchison9 Topeka and Santa Fe RailWay Company application before
said Commission pertaining to the grade crossing for-th~ La Palma Avenue
extension°
The City Council was of the opinion that any costs involved in
the closing of North street should not be born by the City of Anaheim, and
should be at the expense of either the P.UoC. or the railroad.
SAFETY REGULATIONS: Council discussion was held concerning accidental deaths
of children, resulting from drowning in swimming and wading pools, and
from playing in unused refrigerators and freezers.
The City Attorney was directed to research statutes concerning
protective measures for swimming pools and unused refrigerators and freezers,
and to report findings to ~he City Council.
RECESS: Councilman Pebley moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. Councilman Krein seconded
the motion° MOTION CARRIED. (3,55 P.M.)
8002
CitY' Ha.ll, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqust 11, 1964, 1~..30
AFTER R~C~ss~ Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order.
PRESENT~ COUNCILMEN~ Pebley~ Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler.
ABSENTI COUNCILMEN: None~
PRESENT~ ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, Robert Ac Davis°
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY~' Furman Roberts.
CITY CLERK~ Dens Mo Williams.
ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER~ Ralph Oo Pease°
ASSOCIATE PLANNER~ Ronald Grudzinski.
FLAG SALUTE~ Mayor Ghandler led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flago
P~. LIC .H.~ING, RECLASSIFICATION NO, 63-64-103, VARIANCE NO., 1648 (TENTATIVE
TRAGT NO~ 5688): Submitted by Lola Mo and 3ames A. Gosline, and Lyle Bo
Mitchell~ Owners~ KRIC ~-nterprises~ Inca~ Developers; requesting change of
zone from R-A to C-3, Portion A~ C-O, Portion B~ and R-3, Portion C~ and
£urther requesting waiver of the following.
a. Minimum required parking area,
b. Minimum required parking spaces°
Minimum required floor area per dwelling unit°
do Minimum lot area per dwelling unit.
Property located on the west side of Harbor Boulevard~ approximately 660
feet south of Orangewood Avenue, a total area of approximately 9.4 acres
(2177 South Harbor Boulevard)°
The City Planning Commission recommended Tentative Map, Tract No.
5688~ he denied, and pursuant to Resolution Nco 1252~ Series 1964-65,
reco~ended Reclassification Nco 63-64-103 he denied; and pursuant to Reso-
lution No° 1253~ Series 1964-65, denied Variance NCo 1648o
Mro Ronald Grudzinski noted the location of subject property and
the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, briefing the evidence
submitted to and considered hy the City Planning Commission° He reported
that the petitioners requested a ruling on subject applications, although
the plans submitted were considered sub-standard. He thereupon noted the
findings of the City Planning Commission°
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in
opposition to the proposed reclassification and~ variance~ there being no
response~ asked if the applicants or their agent wished to address the
Council°
Mr° Harry Knisely~ Attorney for the applicants~ submitted ren-
derings and plans of the proposed development for Council review. He
advised that in order to comply with recommendations of the City Planning
Commission and allow for a wider street through the property, a waiver of
setback requirements along said street would be necessary°
Regarding density of the development~ as objected to by the City
of Garden Grove~ adjacent to the West~ Mr° Knisely stated that the plans
for the multiple family dwellings show a coverage of approximately fifty-
seven per cent, which conforms to the requirements of the Anaheim Municipal
Code; and because of the subterranean parking, the plans are below the
unit land area requirement.
In conclusion, Mro Knisely advised that the eighteen foot setback
on the proposed auto center~ as recommended by the Planning Commission~
could be effected. Regarding the parking provisions, he was of the opinion
that since plans show an excess of required spaces on Portion "B#~ and
insufficient parking on Portion"A", the matter could be equitably resolved
through parking easements°
Mayor Chandler declared the public hearing closed on Reclassifi-
cation No. 63-64-103 and Variance No° 1648~
8OO3
City Hall~ Anaheim~ C~lifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqu~t 11, 1964, ~30
Plans were reviewed by 'the City Council, COuncilman,Dutton
was o£ the opinion that the primary reason that-plans for subject develop-
ment did not meet the standards of the Anaheim Municipal Code was that
certain portions o£ the proposed R-3 development were to be "bachelor
apartments"~ for which there is no provision in the Code.
RHSOLUIION NOt 64R-596: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution Nco 64R-596
for adoption~ authorizing preparation o£ necessary ordinance~ changing the
zone as requested~ subject to the following conditions:
1. That the owners o£ subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a
strip of land 60 feet in width from the centerline of the street along
Harbor Boulevard £or street widening purposes.
2o That street improvement plans shall he prepared and all engineering
requirements o£ the City o£ Anaheim along Harbor Boulevard, Wilkin Way
and Mallul Drive~ such as curbs and gutters~ sidewalks~ street grading
and paving~ drainage £acilities, or other appurtenant work shall he
completed as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with stan-
dard plans and speci£ications on £ile in the of£ice o£ the City Engineerl
or that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim
shall he posted with the City to guarantee the installation o£ said
engineering requirements.
3o That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum of 15¢ per front foot along Harbor Boulevard~ Wilkin Way and Mallul
Drive for tree planting purposes.
4o That the owner of subject property pay the sum of' $25°00 per dwelling
unit for park and recreation purposes~ to he paid at the time the
building permit is issued°
5o That the approval of Reclassification No. 63-64-103 he subject to
recordation o£ Tract No. 5688~ and the granting of Variance No. 1648.
6° That the Wilkin Way setback of the proposed office building on Portion
"B" he a minimum of five feet in width°
7° That the Wilkin Way setback of the proposed restaurant on Portion "A"
he a minimum of five feet in width.
8~ That the proposed auto center he developed with the Harbor Boulevard
setback a minimum of 15 feet°
9° That the parking easement he recorded, permitting the utilization of
13 surplus parking spaces proposed on Portion "B# by Portion "A"~ or
that an adequate number of parking spaces, as required hy Code, he pro-
vided on Portion "A"o
10o That the proposed 15 £oot Harbor Boulevard setbacks and the 5 foot
Wilkin Way setbacks he provided with landscaping°
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLU/iON OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED° (63-6~-103 - C-3~ C-O and R-3)
Roll Call Voteg
AYES: COUNCILMEN~ Pebley~ Dutton~ Schutte~ Krein and Chandler°
NOES~ COUNGILMEN~ None°
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN~ None°
Mayor Chandler declared Resolution No. 64R-596 duly passed and
adopted°
RESOLUTION NO~ 64R-597: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-597
for adoption, granting Variance Nco 1648~ subject to the following conditions;
1o Subject to the completion of Reclassification No° 63-64-103 and recorda-
tion of Tract No. 5688.
2. Development shall be substantially in accordance with plans marked
Exhibits Nos° 1 through 9~ dated this date and signed by Mayor Chandler.
3o /hat trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works~ prior to
final building inspection.
40 Subject to a time limita'tion of on~ year fro~ ~at~ her~of~ or such
further ti~e as the Council may g~anto
8004
City Hall, Anaheim° California -COUNCIL MINUTES - Auq~st 11, !,964, 1530
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO~ 1648Q
Roll call vote:
AYES~ CO~NCILM~N, Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler.
NOES~ COUNCILMEN~ None~
ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN, None,
The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 64R-597 duly passed and adopted,
TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO~ 5688~ Developer9 KRIC Enterprises~ Incorporatedj
tract located on property described in Reclassification No. 63-64-103, con-
taining 1~ C-O lotj 1~ C-3 lotj and 6, R-3 lots.
The City Planning Commission at their meeting held July 8, 1964,
denied said tentative map.
Councilman Schutte moved that Tentative Map, Tract No. 5688, be
approved, subject to the following conditions:
1o That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision,
each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval°
2o That the owner of subject property shall install street lights as
required by the Director of Public Utilities°
So That Wilkin Way and Mallul Drive he developed 60 feet in width, with
a 40 foot roadway°
4° That drainage shall he handled to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Councilman Dutton seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED°
POLICY OF TH5 COUNCIL: Councilman Dutton moved that it be the policy of this
City Council that on all public hearings recommended by the City Planning
Commission for either approval or denial~ the City Planning Staff be requested
to furnish the Council with the necessary information and recommended condi-
tions pertaining to each application; and further, that any revisions or
additions to said applications occurring after the City Planning Commission's
public hearing~ the material pertaining thereto shall be submitted directly
to the City Council for consideration and disposition° Councilman Schutte
seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED°
PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NO~ 64-65-1 AND VARIANCE NO. 1647: Submitted by
Edward Eo Pisher~ Stuart Lo 3ohnson, Paul and Clada Mo Pletz~ requesting
change of zone from R-A to R-3~ waiver of one-story height limitation within
150 feet of R-A zoned property~ permission to construct carports in lieu of
garages~ and waiver of minimum required side yard; property briefly des-
cribed as located on the west side of Knott Avenue, approximately 660 feet
north of Orange Avenue°
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No° 1246,
Series 1964-65. recommended Reclassification No. 6~-65-1 for denial! and
pursuant to Resolution No° 1247~ Series 1964-65, denied Variance No° 1647o
Mr° Grudzinski noted the location of subject property, the existing
uses and zoning in the immediate area. and briefed the evidence submitted to
and considered by the City Planning Commission° He reported that the develop-
ment, as proposed~ was in conformance with the City's Land Use Policy, as
depicted on the General Planj however~ certain features of the plans were
inconsistant with the amendments to the R-3 Zoning Ordinance, as recommended
by the City Planning Commission°
Mr° Grudzinski further noted that revised plans had been submitted
and reviewed by the Planning Staff only~ and called attention to their memo-
randum~ recommending that said revised plans be referred to the City Planning
Commission for review and recommendation=
8O05
Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Aucust 117 1964. 1:30
·
'~. In answer to Councilman Dutton's question, Mro Grudzinskl reported
that the original plans were inconsistant with the recommended R-3 amend-
ments basically in the location of the primary access'way.
·
Revised plans and application file, together with report per-
taining to revised plans were reviewed by the City Council.
The Mayor asked if the-,applicants or their.agent,.wished to
address the City Council. ' , ~ -'~ ~
Mr. Harry Knisely', Attorney representing the applicants, advised
that the revised plot plan was reversed from the original plan.submitted,
placing the access street along the northerly bOundary cf..the propertY, and
reducing said private street to a half width.
Council discussion was held, and communication dated July 31,
1964, from the Centralia SchooI District; expreSsing.opposition to
additional multiple family dwellings in the area, noted. ~.~.~-~ ~ '~
The Mayor asked if any one wished to address the Council in opposi-
tion to the requested reclassification and variance, there being no response,
declared the public hearing closed on Reclassification Nco 64-65-1 and
Variance Nco 1647o
RESOLUTION NO, 64R-598: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-598
for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the
zone on subject property as requested, subject to the following conditions:
That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a
strip of land 53 feet in width, from the center line of the street,
along Knott Street, for street widening purposes.
2o That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering
requirements of the City of Anaheim along Knott Street, such as curbs
and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving~ drainage facilities,
or other appurtenant work shall he completed as required hy the City
Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on
file in the office of the City EngineerS and that a bond in an amount
and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim may be posted with the
City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements.
3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum of $2°00 per front foot along Knott Street, for Street lighting
purposes~
That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum of 15¢ per front foot along Knott Street, for tree planting purposes°
5o That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent
upon the granting of Variance No. 1647o
6o That Conditions Nos° 1, 2~ 3 and 4, above mentioned, shall be complied
with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time
as the City Council may grant.
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED. (64-65-1 - R-3)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCI/3~EN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte~ Krein and Chandler°
NOES: COUNCILNE~N: None°
ABSENT: COUNCIL~EN~ None°
The Mayor declared Resolution No° 64R-598 duly passed and adopted.
8006
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINU/F~ - Auqugt 11, 1964, 1~30
RESO~UTI. ON NO, 64R-599: Councilman Dutton'offered ResOlution No. 64R-599
for adoption9 granting Variance Nco 1647, subject to the following condi-
tions:
Subject to development in accordance with revised plans, marked "Exhibit
No° 1, Revision No. 2", dated this date and signed hy the Mayor°
2. That trash storage areas shall he provided in accordance with approved
plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works.
3. That fire hydrants shall he installed as required and determined to he
necessary hy the Chief of the Fire Department°
4. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to he used for park and recreation pur-
poses, said amount to he paid at the time the building permit is issued.
5o That this Variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassifi-
cation Nos 64-65-1o
60 That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, ah.ye mentioned, shall he complied with
prior to final building inspection.
7; Subject to a time limitation of one year from date hereof, or such further
time as the Council may grant.
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE
NO. 1647o
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler°
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None.
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-599 duly passed and adopted°
PUBLIC HE~%RING, RECLASSIFICATION NO, 64-65-2 AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO, 27:
Submitted hy Gordon L. Hodges and Kent F~ Campbell requesting change of zone
from R-A to C-1 (Portion "A,) and C-O (Portion ~B"I; property briefly des-
crihed as located at the southeast corner of Dale Avenue and Ball Road (2780
West Ball Road).
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution NoQ 1249,
Series 1964-65, recommended Reclassification No. 64-65-2 be approved~ subject
to the following conditions:
That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a
strip of land 45 feet in width, from the centerline of the street along
Dale Avenue, for street widening purposes°
2o That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a
strip of land 53 feet in width, from the centerline of the street along
Ball Road, including a 25-foot radius corner return, for street widening
purposes.
3. That street improvement plans shall be prepared and all engineering
requirements of the City of Anaheim along Dale Avenue and Ball Road~
such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage
facilities9 or other appurtenant work shall be completed as required by
the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifica-
tions on file in the office of the City Engineer~ and that a bond in an
amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim may be posted with
the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements.
4o That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum of $2.00 per front foot along Dale Avenue and Ball Road, for street
lighting purposes°
5° That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum of 15¢ per front foot along Dale Avenue and Ball Road for tree
planting purposes.
6. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works.
8007
QitY Ha!l, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINU/ES - Auqust. 11~ 1964' 1:30 .P.M.
7. That Conditions Nos..1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, above mentioned, shalI be comi
plied with within a period'of 180 days from date hereof~ or such further
time as the City Council may grant.
8o That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked
Exhibit Nos° 1 and 29 provided~ however, that accessways to Dale Street
and Ball Road shall be subject to the approval of the Traffic Engineer°
9o That Portion "A" of subject property shall be developed substantially in
accordance with adopted Service Station Minimum Site Development Stan-
dards, provided, however, that the elevations for the proposed service
station building and canopies shall incorporate masonry materials in a
manner compatible to the commercial office development on Portion "B",
subject to the approval of the Planning Commission or Development Review°
10o That on Portion "B" of subject property, landscaping as indicated on
Exhibit No° 1 on file with the City shall be installed and maintained~
and that plans for said landscaping shall be submitted to and subject to
the approval of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance°
11o That a 6-foot masonry wall shall be constructed along the east and south
property lines of Portion "B" of subject property°
12o That all air-conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from
view from abutting streets°
13° That Condition Nos° 6, 99 10, 11 and 12, above mentioned, shall be com-
plied with prior to final building inspection°
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution Nco 1250,
Series 1964-659 recommended that General Plan Amendment No° 27 be disapproved°
Mr° Grudzinski noted the location of subject property and the
existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, briefing the evidence sub-
mitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission° He reported that
three alternative amendments to the General Plan, as posted on the west
wall'df the Coun¢il'Ghamber, were ¢onsiderad by the Planning Commission,
and it was their opinion that the proposed change in land use,~ as proposed
under Reclassification No. 64-65-2, did not warrant a change to the General
Plano
Plans and the files were reviewed by the City Council, and the
Mayor asked if anyone wished to addressed the Council in opposition to the
reclassification~ there being no response9 asked if the applicants or their
agent was present=
Mr. Gated Smith, Architect for the project~ was present to answer
any questions of the City Council°
Mayor Chandler declared the public hearing closed on Reclassifica-
tion Nco 64-65-2 and General Plan Amendment No° 27°
RESOLUTION NO° 64R-600: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No° 64R-600 for
adoption~ authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance, changing the zone
as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission°
Refer to Resolution Book~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER-
MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
SHOULD BE ANtHND£D, AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE
CHANGED° (64-65-2 - C-1 and C-O)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler°
NOES~ COUNCILMEN: None°
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None.
The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 64R-600 duly passed and adopted°
RESOLUTION NO. 64R-601~ Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-601 for
_
_
adoption, approving General Plan Amendment No~ 27,.Exhibit "B".
8008
City Ha.11, .A~.a~eim, ..C~.liforn. ia - CQUNCIL. M~IN.UTES - Auqust 11, 1964, 1,30
Refer to Resolution Book~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING GENERAL
PLAN AMEND~IENT NOo 27~ EXHIBII "B"o (64-65-2)
Roll call votes
AYES: COUNCIL~EN~ Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler.
NOES~ COUNCIL~EN~ None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None°
The Mayor declared Resolution Nco 64R-601 duly passed and adopted.
EON_lNG .I..NV.~NT..ORY MAp, Discussion was held by the City Council and Mro Grudzinski
regarding the General Plan, and the possibility of preparation of a similar
map indicating the existing City zoning inventory~ and currently reflecting
changes made thereto°
Mr° Douglas Farley, of the Anaheim Area Vistor and Convention
Bureau9 suggested that the proposed map he accomplished hy preparing four or
five glass overlay panels that can he rolled in front of the existing Gen-
eral Plan Map°
At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Dutton moved that
an additional map he prepared hy the present Planning Department personnel,
to be posted on the east wall of the Council Chambers indicating the existing
zoning inventory throughout the City, and that only the expense of necessary
paper and supplies he authorized° Councilman Chandler seconded the motion°
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton and Chandler°
NOES~ COUNOIL~EN~ Schutte and Krein~
ABSTAINED~ COUNCILMAN~ Pehleyo
ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN~ None° .~~
motion failed to carry
Mayor Chandler declared the foregoing/~XX~MX~X~X~.
REGESS: Councilman Dutton moved for a fifteen minute recess° Councilman Chandler
seconded the motion° MOTION CARRI~Do (8:~5 P°M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order9 all members of the
City Council being present°
~UBLI~ H£ARIN,G, RECLASSIFIQATION NO, 64-65-$~ Submitted by Giacomo and Agostina
Lugaro, requesting change of zone from C-1 (limited) to C-1 (unlimited);
property located at the southeast corner of Magnolia and Crescent Avenues°
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution Nco 12449
Series 1964-65~ recommended Reclassification No° 64-65-3 be denied°
Mro Grudzinski noted the location of subject property, the exist-
ing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and briefed the evidence submitted
to and considered by the City Planning Commission° He reported that the
property was classified C-l, Limited, under Reclassification No° 59-60-107,
being limited to specific uses by Deed Restrictions recorded as a condition
of said reclassification; and Reclassification No° 64-65-3 is requested to
allow a service station on the property°
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in
opposition to the proposed service station°
Mr. Joe Bas~ 612 North Magnolia Avenue, stated he failed to see
the necessity for another service station in subject area, and called atten-
tion to the existing hazardous traffic conditions and noise at the inter-
section which would be increased by the addition of a service station°
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council in
opposition to the request~ there being no response~ asked if the applicant
or his agent wished to address the Council°
8O09
Gi~Y Hall~ Anahei~ California - COUNCIL MI.~UIES - Auqust 11. 1964. 1:30
- Mro Craig Grainger,-125 South Claudina street, Agent fOr the
Petitioner, advised that through another real estate broker, Standard Oil
Company had been offered the three properties on Magnolia Avenue, across
Crescent Avenue to the North~ for a service station site; however~ due to
the existing commercial zoning,and development on subject property, it
appeared to the Standard Oil Company that this would be a more logical site
for a service station° He further advised that there is very little pedes-
trian traffic on Magnolia Avenue at this location, and that the requested
reclassification would affect only the corner portion of a large commercial
parcel, which has been limited by deed restrictions to certain commercial
and office uses under the previous reclassification°
Plans and the file were reviewed by the City Council, and Mayor
Chandler asked if the oil co~pany would be willing to construct a station
of a residential-type in design°
Mr~ Ellison, Architect for Standard Oil Company, stated that the
residential designed stations are usually installed where the neighborhood
is basically residential; however~ they cannot incorporate their identify-
ing fin-type signs with this type of architecture~ In order to beautify
the proposed station~ he noted the extra landscape planting and stone work
planned, as shown on a colored rendering included with plans suhmittedo
Mro Ellison was of the opinion that the resulting structure would he com-
patible with existing buildings in the adjacent commercial center°
Mayor Chandler declared the public hearing closed on Reclassi-
fication Noo 63-64-3°
R,fSOLUTION NO, 64R-602: Discussion was held by the City Council, and at
the conclusion thereof~ Councilman Schutte offered Resolution Noo 64R-602
for adoption, authorizing the amendment of deed restrictions filed in con-
nection with Reclassification Noo 59-60-107 to permit service station use
of property described in Reclassification No° 64-65-3, subject to the
following conditions:
That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works°
2° That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the
sum of 15¢ per front foot along Crescent Avenue and Magnolia Avenue for
tree planting purposes°
3o That Condition No° 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a
period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City
Council may grant°
4° That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked
Exhibit Nco 4, providing however, that the planting area shown on
Exhibit Nco 5 shall be incorporated in the proposed development°
5o That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with adopted Service Station Minimum Site Development Standards°
6° That Conditions Nos° 1 and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to final building inspection°
7o Subject to amendment to Deed Restrictions for subject property only,
to allow development for a service station, as requested°
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CONSENTING TO
AMENDMENT TO THAT CERTAIN DECLARATION OE RESTRICTIONS RECORDED AUGUST 17,
t960, IN BOOK ~379, PAGES 13, 14, 15 AND 16, DOCUMENT NO~ 144880, IN
CONNECTION WITH RECLASSIFICATION NOo 59-60-107o (6~-65-~ - C-l)
Roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Peb!ey, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler°
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None o
ABSENT~- COUNCILMEN: None°
The Mayor declared Resolution No° 64R-602 duly passed and adopted°
8010
C%ty. Hall~ Ansheim, California - COUNCI% MINUTES -. Auqust 11, 1964, 1~30
RBOUEST - ANAHEIM TEM~L,~ ASSOCIATION~ Communication dated July 22, 1964,.from
Mr. 3ames Seay~ Chairman of the Anaheim Temple Association~ was submitted,
requesting clarification of fees levied against said association for their
fund-raising barbecue, held in La Palma Park on June 6, 1964o
Assistant City Manager Robert Davis briefed a memorandum report
from the Parks and Recreation Department (copies furnished each Councilman),
and advised that fees were assessed to the Anaheim Temple Association for
said event~ in accordance with schedule adopted by the Parks and Recreation
Commission in February, 1964, and by the City Council July 7, 1964, in Res-
olution No. 64R-482o He noted said resolution stipulates, under Group
that organizations using city park facilities for events to raise funds for
buildings~ which would be used for the benefit of members of said organiza-
tion only~ are subject to charges for cleanup~ and for returning of the
facilities to proper condition~ plus fifteen per cent of the gross monies
derived from the use°
Mayor Chandler invited the petitioner to address the City Council.
Mr. James Seay noted that the fee schedule referred to was adopted
after the tickets had been printed and distributed. In answer to Councilman
Pebley's question~ he advised that the proposed new building will be used by
members of the two local Masonic Lodges and related youth organizations, and
will also be rented to other groups for dances~ etc°
Mro Seay further advised of the amount of gross receipts and
expenses resulting from the barbecue, noting that fees for conducting this
annual event in 1963 would have been only for cleanup; however~ the park was
left in excellent condition and no charges were made by the City.
Mr. James Latham., Chairman of the Building Fund~ Anaheim Temple
Association, submitted a rendering of the proposed Masonic Temple, and
advised that the City will derive a benefit from the tax structure with the
completidn of the building; that the building will include seven'commercial
offices which will be leased~ and dining rooms available for rental h¥
service clubs and organizations°
Mr° Eo H~ Van Meter, 201 North Fmily Street, addressed the Council
advising of the various charities supported hy the local Masonic Lodges. He
was of the opinion that no fees should he charged for the fund-raising event
since the sponsors were tax-paying citizens, the food was donated, and the
ticket purchasers were, in fact, donating to the Building Fund° Mr. Van
Meter further advised that proceeds from the rental of offices in the pro-
posed new building will he used for maintenance and upkeep costs°
Discussion was held by the City Council, and at the conclusion
thereof~ Councilman Schutte moved that the City Council stay the proceedings
on the collection of fifteen per cent fees charged to the Anaheim Temple
Association~ to January 5~ 1965~ and during the time said stay is in effect,
reconsider the policy pertaining to charges to organizations such as this,
for use of the park facilities; further, that the matter be referred back to
the Parks and Recreation Commission for further study and report° Councilman
Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRI~Do
PROPOSAL - LITTLE MISS AMERICA PAGSANT~ Discussion was held by the City Council
regarding the proposal made to the City of Anaheim during the afternoon ses-
sion of this meeting, that the City host the First Annual Little Miss America
Pageant in November, 1964.
At the conclusion of the discussion, on motion by Councilman Krein,
seconded hy Councilman Pehley~ the City Clerk was directed to notify Mr°
Brunk, Executive Director~ that the City of Anaheim declines at this time the
offer to host the Little Miss America Pageant. ~OTION CARRIED°
PUBLIC HE,/%RING - GENERAL PLkN AMENDMENT NO, 16 (CONDITIONAL USE pER~IT NO, 544)1,
Public hearing was scheduled on proposed amendment to the Circulation Element
of the General Plan relating to Arterial Streets and Highways, and Highway
Rights-of-Way~ concerning the realignment of Manchester Avenue° Said amend-
ment was filed in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No° 544~ granted
by the City Planning Commission March 16, 1964, no action taken by the City
Council. (Property located at the southeast corner of Harbor Boulevard and
Manchester Avenue°)
8011
~ityH.all,..ABaheim, Califprnia.- COUNCIL MINUTES - Auqqst 11, 1964,
The City Planning Commission pursUant to Resolution NOo t243~
Series 1964-65~ recommended that th~ Highway-Rlghts-of-Wa¥Circ~'tatiGn
Element Of the General Plan be amended in accordance with General Plan
Amendment Nco 16~ Exhibit "A'"~ and further recommended that the Table of
Exceptions of the official Highway Rights-of-Way Plan, Marked Exhibit "C"
be amended°
With the aid of Sectional District Maps posted on the east wall
of the Council Chamber. Mro Grudzinski noted the location of that portion
of Manchester Avenue proposed for realignment'to the North~ in order to
provide a full 90 foot street~ as required for secondary arterial highways~
as follows= South of the Harbor Boulevard-Santa Aha Freeway intersection,
and easterly of Harbor Boulevard°
Assistant City Engineer Ralph Pease referred to Finding No. 2 of
the City Planning Commission's Resolution No. 1243~ Series 1964-65, wherein
the City Engineer recommended that future possible Rights-of-Way he pro,
tected from encroachment of buildings by the establishment of a building
setback line along the north side of Manchester Avenue, extending approxi-
mately 150 feet easterly of Harbor Boulevard°
Ihe Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, there
being no response~ declared the public hearing closed on General Plan
Amendment No° 16o
RESOLUTION NO, 64R-603~ Councilman Schutte offered ResOlution No. 64R~603
for adoptioho
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE C~NERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 16o (~Exhibit A)
,C~rcuxa~ion Element Manchester Avenue)
Roll Call Vote~
AYES~ COUNCILM~N~ Pebley. Dutton. Schutte, Krein and Chandler.
NOES~ COU~ILMEN~ None°
ABSENT~ COUNClLMEN~ None°
The Mayor declared Resolution No° 64R-603 duly passed and adopted°
On motion by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Pebley~
the City Attorney was instructed to prepare necessary ordinance~ establishing
setback requirements on the north side of Manchester Avenue, in accordance
with recommendations of the City Planning Commission~ MOTION CARRIED°
PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO~ ~6 (RECLASSIFICAIION NO. 63-64-145):
Public hearing was scheduled on proposed amendment to the General Plan con-
cerning the area of Western Avenue and Ball Road° Reclassification No°
68-64-14B~ granted by the City Council July 28~ 1964~ was approved for C-1
zoning on the north side of Ball Road~ approximately 182 feet west of
Western Avenue~
The City Planning Commission~ pursuant to Resolution Nco 1256~
Series 1964-65~ recommended General Plan Amendment Nco 26 be disapproved°
Mro Grudzinski noted the location of subject area, and referred
to alternative exhibits posted on the west wall of the Council Chamber,
marked Exhibits "A" and "B"o He advised that the disapproval of General
Plan Amendment No° 26 was based on the fact that Planning Study Nco 39-6-4~
Plan No° 2, as up-dated~ substantiates the land use policy and reflects the
development which had been approved along the Ball Road frontage°
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council~
there being no response~ declared the public hearing closed on General
Plan Amendment No° 26°
8012
City Hall. Anaheim. California.- COUNCIL MINUIHS - Auqu~t 11, 1964. 1~30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO, 64Rc604: At the conclusion of Council discussion, Councilman
Chan41er offered Resolution No. 64R-604 for adoption~ approving General Plan
Amendment No. 26, Exhibit "A".
Refer to Resolution Book°
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH~_ CITY OF ANAH~-IM APPROVING AN AMEND-
MENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 26. (Reclassifica'tion
No. 63-64-145)
Roi1 Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None°
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None°
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-604 duly passed and adopted,
,!NTF~IM ZQNING ORDI.NANCE - YORBA ANNEXATIONs The City Clerk briefed recommenda-
tion from the City Planning Commission, noting that an area map indicating
existing Orange County zoning for territory designated as Yorba Annexation,
and the comparable City of Anaheim zoning for said territory~ was reviewed~
and Exhibit "A" was recommended as representing the most comparable zoning
of the City as it applies to said territory,
ORDINANCE NO. 2028: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2028 for
adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book°
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (Yorba Annexation)
Said Ordinance was read in full by the City Clerk.
On roi1 call the foregoing Ordinance was duly passed and adopted
hy the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL~EN~ Pebley, Dutton~ Schutte9 Krein and Chandler.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None°
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN~ None~
Mayor Chandler declared urgency Ordinance No. 2028 duly passed and
adopted°
,ADJO~RNME~rf: Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn~ Councilman Krein seconded the
motion° MOTION CARRIED°
ADJOURNED: 11: O0 P o M o
' '~ City Clerk