Loading...
1964/10/278163 City Hall, Anaheim, Ca~ifprn~a - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 20. 1964. 1:30 P.M., R~QuEsTi FOR CODE iNTERPRETATION: ..Mr. Sid Dix, Of_HOuse of Natur9 Wood, !.~4._West. Lincoln Avenue, explained their business of manufacturing and finishing furniture, and requested clarification of the C-2 Zoning Code with referenC~ to manufacturing and processing in connection with retail sales, He advised of the safety measures presently installed at the request of the Anaheim Fire Department, and the additional precautions now required to allow opera- tion of their paint spray booth. Further, that the portion of the refinishing is less than fifty per cent of their furniture business. Discussion was held, and on the recommendations of the City Attorney, Councilman Schutte moved it be the finding of this City Council that the business is a G-2 Use, that the spray painting operation is inci- dental thereto, and therefore allowable, subject to requirements of the Fire Department. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE - WITHDRAWAL OF PROTEST: On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Chandler, protest filed by the City Attorney to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against application for a New"On-Sale Beer and Wine License at 1740 West La Palma Avenue because of the C-1 zoning on the property, was authorized to be withdrawn, since it has been determined that a conditional use permit was granted~ permitting said use on subject property~ MOTION CARRIED° ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Krein moved to adjourn to Executive Session. Councilman Du%ton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (10:35 P.M.) ADJOURNMENT: motion. Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. MOTION CARRIED° Councilman Dutton seconded the ADJOURNED: 10:45 P.Mo Deputy City Clerk City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Octobe.r 27, 1964, 1:30 The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte~ Krein and Chandler. COUNCILMEN: None. CiTY MANAGER: Keith Ao Murdocho CIIY ATTORNEY: Joseph G.eis~r. CITY CLERK: Done Mo Williams° CiiY ENGINEER: 3ames Maddox. ZONING COORDINATOR: Ronald Grudzinski. Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order. MINU/ES: Minutes of the regular meetings held October'6, 1964, and October 13~ 1964~ were approved on mo%ion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. ~ ~ESOLU/ION NO, 64R-773: Councilman Krein offered Resolution No. 64R-773 for' adoption. Refer ~o Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND DIR- ECTING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF OCTOBER 27, 1964. (Warrants Nos. 34~875 to and including 35,153 - totaling $626,665.48) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN.. NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler. None.. None° The Mayor declared Reso!u~ion No. 64R-.773 duly passed and adopted. 8164 ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 27. 1964, 1:30 DOWNTOWN SHOPPERS MALL - 100 BLOCK WEST LINCOLN AVENUe: Mrs. Dorothy Yungbluth Ulvestad reviewed the highlights of the first meeting held in 1960, attended by representatives of the City Council, the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, members of the Chamber of Commerce~ and interested citizens - property owners. She advised that the meeting was held because of their concern and the recognized problems in the central b~tsiness district. Considered at the meeting was the upgrading of buildings, bringing in new enterprises, parking, etCo Mrs~ Ulvestad stated that at the request of the owners in this block~ she has Chairmanned the project, which they are now attempting to finalize. She related the tragic event, the accidental death of a child in the alley at the rear of one of the buildings~ which influenced her decision to accept the task of developing an improvement program, and requested the Council to keep in mind the safety factors involved when considering the proposal° Attention was called to the pedestrian traffic in the alley~ and the increasing use of the rear entrances to business establishments. MtSo Ulvestad briefly reviewed the subsequent meetings held~ the selection of Richard Layne Tom, Architect for the project~ and noted the support of the project by others outside the district. An explanation was given for the postponements involved. Also reported were construction alterations made, and changes in tenants since 1960. Mrs. Ulvestad~ recognizing that an over-ail survey of the Downtown Area was presently being undertaken, was of the opinion every indication pointed %o the possible delay of five to fifteen years on any large City-wide plano Mro James McWaters~ President of the Independent Bank, advised of their plans %o occupy the building presently occupied by the McMahan Furniture Store (formerly Greschner Building), and further advised that the major reason for selecting this site was the plan for the revitalization of the 100 block~ and cooperation in this plan was made a condition of their lease. Mro McWaters was of the further opinion that the City should at this time take steps to improve the parking lot to the North. Mr. Arthur Hearth~ present owner of the property formerly known as the "Greschner property~'~ advised of their support of the project, and their willingness to improve their property. He too was of the opinion that the City parking lot should be improved at the same time. Mro Kenneth Bradiey~ Vice President of Smith-Reafsnyder Furniture Store~ advised of their support of the projected improvements~ and their willingness to participate at any time %he plan goes forward~ Mro Richard Tom~ Architect, reported on the progress made to date~ and presented a rendering of the over-ali prospective~ expressing the concept. He further reported that the working drawings were approximately seventy-five per cent complete~ Other renderings presented, illustrating planned improvements~ were: Schaeffer Paint Store Weber Book Store Ronnie's Coffee Shop Baton Music Store Bakery Chamber of Commerce Building Independent Bank (McMahan Furni- ture Store) Mr. Norvald Ulvestad stated that the project is proceeding without State or Federal aid, proving their interest and confidence in the future of Anaheim° He was of the opinion that the improvement will be productive~ not only to the property owners but to all. He thereupon requested the City Council to renew their declaration of intent previously taken in this matter. Mro Murdoch read from the City Council minutes of March 27, 1962, the intention of the City Council as expressed. 8165 City H~ll, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - OctoBer 27, 1964, i.:30 P,M, Mr. Murdoch reported that for a period of two years, funds have been carried forward which could be made available for the project, as estimated in 1962~ however, recognizing the status of the Shoppers Lane Project, and the fact that the property owners were not in full agreement to proceed, the funds were diverted and used for the acquisition of the Anaheim Stadium site. The City will be reimbursed by the Non-Profit Corporation, upon the sale of the bonds, and it is anticipated that suffi- cient funds will be available for both the acquisition of the Convention Hall facility site and this project, soon after the first of the year. Mr. Murdoch further reported on notations made at an informal meeting held October 1, 1963, at which time an informal agreement was reached wherein the City would pay for the improvement of the parking lot, alley conversion, underground electric and telephone lines from the General and Parking Meter Funds. Further, the City would advance funds for electrical service connections to the meters on the buildings, and for the placement of the telephone system underground from the telephone conduit to the building. As result of this meeting, and based upon the latest indication from the City Council, a revised estimate of cost was then pre- pared. Discussion was held concerning methods of repayment of funds advanced by the City foz those improvements noted. At the conclusion thereof~ the City Manager was requested to bring up to date the estimated cost to the City and meet with the property owners involved to prepare a report as to the understanding and intentions of the people proposing the project in order 'to determine if the property owners' understanding conforms with that of the City. The report is to include the suggested methods of repayment of funds advanced by the City, the matter to be again considered November 4, 1964, 1:30 PoMo At the request of Mr. Ulvestad, on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the expression of intent adopted March 27, 1962, was reaffirmed. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN REQUEST: Request submitted by Nona Mo Martens for permission to erect a free-standing sign at the south end of the property located at 419 South Brookhurst Street, was deferred from the meeting of October 20, 1964. On motion by Councilman $chutte, seconded by Councilman Krein, request was granted, subject to the placement of the sign in the center ten per cent of the parcel of property on which the business is located. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN RHQUEST - SHELL OIL COMPANY~ Application by Shell Oil Company for permission to erect a double-faced Modular "Shell" sign at the northwest corner of La Palma Avenue and Dowling Street, was deferred from the meeting of October 20, 19649 for submission of revised plans. Mro Bruce Go Martin, 1085 North Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, repre- senting the applicant, advised that the plan had been revised in accordance with Council request. Revised plans were compared with original plans submitted. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, sign request was granted~ subject to the following conditions: 1o No projection over the property line. 2. Six foot by six foot sign letter module. 3. The height of the sign shall not exceed the height of existing Texaco sign across the street. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO, 63-64-68: Request submitted by Keystone Savings and Loan Association for permission to 'temporarily house business machines in a resi- dential structure was submitted to the City Council at their meeting held October 20, 1964. Action by the City Council on this issue was tabled to this date. 8166 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Octpber 27, 1964, 1:30 The City Clerk submitted a petition received at open meeting this. date .containing seventy-three signatures protesting the granting of the request on the basis that such use would be contrary to the zoning and per- mitted use of the property. Mr. Charles F. Bottomley, Assistant Vice President of Keystone Savings and Loan Association, advised that the addition to their principal structure was contemplated to be completed in two years, and will have an area to accommodate the machine equipment; however during this period of time, permission is requested to use the center dwelling of their ownership (536 Fairhaven) to temporarily house the tabulating equipment for data processing~ the proposed hours of operation being from 4:00 PoM. to 10~00 Mr. Bob Fitzgerald, 512 Fairhaven Street, objected to the temporary use of the residence for business machines, and was of the opinion that the property should be improved as originally planned, in order for the area to resume its residential character as quickly as possible. Mr. Geisler reported that it was his understanding that this would be a temporary measure, and not an intent to vary from the original plano Mayor Chandler asked if anyone had anything further to add to the discussion, there being no response~ declared the discussion closed and further~clared the former motion not before the Council. "On motion by Councilman Dutton~ seconded by Councilman Krein, temporary use of the residence at 536 Fairhaven Street to house loBoMo equip- ment was granted~ not to exceed a period of two years~ and subject to the following conditions~ 1o Hours of operation not to extend beyond 10:00 P.M~ 2o Residential structure add residential landscaping to be maintained, 3o_T~he structure shall/b%°~pened as a business office and no customers are .~/'to be invited or allowed in the temporary office. To this motion~ Councilman Schutte voted ~'No." MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICAIION NO~ 63-64-99 - CLARIFICATION: Request submitted at the last meeting of the City Council by Joe L. Lane for extension of time to comply with conditions of Reclassification No° 63-64-99, was granted, subject to the payment of street lighting and street tree fees by November 1, 1964. The City Clerk requested clarification of City Council's action~ inasmuch as the payment of street lighting and street tree fees were the only requirements not yet met° The City Council determined that the action as originally recorded was correct° ~ONTINUED PUBLIC H£ARING: Amendment to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code by the addition of Chapter 18~61 "NRC, Natural Resources and Conservation Zone"° Public hearing was held September 15~ and 29, 1964, and continued to this date° Orange County Water District re-draft of suggested provisions~ received October 22, 1964, was submitted, together with correspondence from Sully-Miller Contracting Company. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seco~'d~d by Councilman Krein, public hearing was ordered further continued to November 24~ 1964, 1:30 P.M. and suggested provisions submitted referred to the City Planning Commission for report and recommendation~ prior to the continued public hearing date. MOTION CARRIED. .PUBLIC HEARING~ Public hearing was held on amendment to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code to consider the addition of "Definitions" of Chapters 18.08.300 - Dwelling Multiple~ 18.08.400 - Hotel, and.l.8.08.730 - Tourist Court in accordance with recommendations of the Cmty~lannzng Commission, Resolution No. 13459 Series 1964-65. ~ 8167 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 27, 1964, 1:30 P,M, The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council either for or against said proposed amendments, there being no response, declared the hearing closed° Discussion was held, and it was determined that the definition pertaining to ~'Hotel"' and "'Tourist Court" be as follows: 18.08.400 ~'HOTEL" A building in which there are six or more guest rooms where lodging with or without meals is provided for compensation, and where no provision is made for cooking in any individual room or suite. 3ails, hospitals, asylums, sanitariums or orphanages, prisons, detention homes or similar buildings where human beings are housed and detained under legal restraint are specifically not included. All of the accommodations in a hotel shall be for the use of tourists or transients. Tourists or transients shall be defined as persons renting accommodations for one or more periods of time~ any single time period not exceeding one (1) week or seven (7) days. Nothing contained herein shall preclude any person or persons from renting any accommodations described herein for as many successive weekly or seven (7)- day time periods as said person or persons may choose. 18.08.730 "'MOTEL A group of attached or detached buildings containing individual sleeping or living units with parking space conveniently located to each unit, all of which units are for the temporary use by automobile tourists or tran- sients~ includes auto courts~ tourist courts~ motor iodges~ or motor hotels° Tourists or transients shall be defined as persons renting accommodations for one or more periods of .time~ any single time period not exceeding one (1) week or seven (7) days~ Nothing contained herein shall preclude any person or persons from renting any accommodations described herein for as many successive weekly or seven (7)-day 'time periods as said person or persons may choose° On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Krein, the City Attorney was directed to prepare an ordinance amending the Anaheim Municipal Code in accordance with City Planning Commissiongs recommendations pertaining to Section 18.08o3009 and in accordance with the above, pertain- ing to Sections 18.08o400 and 18.08o730. MO/ION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED ABANDONMENT: In accordance with Resolution No. 64R-715~ duly published and posted in accordance with law~ public hearing was held on proposed abandonment of an easement for avenue and public utility purposes upon, over~ across~ along and through property described in Resolution No. 64R-715, reserving therefrom an easement for public utility purposes (prop- erty briefly described as the south side of Cerritos Avenue, one lot west and two lots east of Dallas Drive.) The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. Mr~ 3ames Haight, 1503 South Dallas Drive (Lot 35, Tract No. 3247) addressed the Council stating he had been informed that the abandoned property would reve~t to him, and because of its present condition and the cost involved to remove sunken and buried concrete curbing and other debris and to fill in sunken areas~ further, because of the possibility of increase in his property taxes~ he would accept the property~ but felt that it should be cleaned and planted, and put in good condition first. Mr. Haight further reported that for approximately five years he has endeavored to have the area cleaned, and it has been estimated that the equipment rental atone to remove the debris would cost approximately $200.00. Mro Geisler explained that the property at the present time is that of the adjacent land owner, that it is their responsibility now to maintain the area, as the City has only an easement for public use. 8168 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 27, 1964, 1:30 Mro Haight further advised that when he purchased his property, Cerritos Street had not been extended. The parcel in question was created in the design of the street when the adjacent subdivision was developed. He had assumed the property was that of the subdivider~ At the conclusion of the discussion, on motion by Councilman Schutte~ seconded by Councilman Dutton~ public hearing was continued to November 4, 1964, 1:30 PoM~, and the City Engineer was requested to make further investigation to determine who was responsible for the construction of the original curbing° MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING, PROPOSED ABANDONMENT: Pursuant to Resolution Nco 64R-716, duly published and property posted in accordance with law, public hearing was held on proposed abandonment of an alley between Lots 2 and 17~ Tract No~ 304~ briefly described as an alley running north and south, off of Mills Drive, between Philadelphia and Emily Streets. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. The City Clerk submitted a letter of protest received from Arleen Co Tapert, owner of property at 235 Mills Drive. Mrs° Rosemary Agan, 229 Mills Drive, owner of the other parcel of property adjacent 'to the alle¥~ reported that the abandonment commenced upon her request; 'that approximately two years ago, she had investigated how the abandonment could be accomplished~ and at that time Mrs° Tapert was in agree- ment; however~ she had not questioned Mrs° Tapert when the letter of request was written. Mrs° Agan further advised that the alley was unimproved~ and not used° On motion by Councilman Pebley~ seconded by Councilman Dutton, public hearing was continued to November I0, 1964, 1:30 P.M.~ to allow Mrs° Agan an opportunity to contact Mrs. Tapert to obtain her written consent to said abandonment° MOTION CARRIED° RECESS: Councilman Krein moved for a fifteen minute recess. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED° (3:58 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order~ all members of the City Council present° PROPOSED WORLD~ FAIR: A report was submitted~ received from the California World% Fair Committee, and recommendations from the Steering Committee including reasons therefor~ recommending that a resolution be considered by the City Council endorsing the California World% Fair in the premises, expressing support for the projectj and urging the Orange County Board of Supervisors to use its best efforts to achieve for Orange County the roll of Host to the California World% Fair. It was moved by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Krein, that the City Council do not endorse said resolution. During the discussion that followedj the position of individual Councilmen was briefly as follows: Councilman Pebley was of the opinion that the Fair would be non- beneficial to the City~ and would therefore also be non-beneficial to the County of Orange° Councilman Krein advised that if the Fair was not located in the City of Anaheim~ and if the City of Anaheim had no financial interest in the Fair~ he would not oppose its location elsewhere~ nor its sponsorship by the Board of Supervisors. Councilman Dutton was of the opinion that the proposal could be endorsed in principle; however~ at the present time answers have not been furnished to all phases of %he proposal~ and all facts are not yet known. Councilman Dutton also opposed its location in the City of Anaheim, in that 8169 City Hall, Anaheim, California - couNCIL MINUTES - October 27, 1.964, 1:30 P.M. he could see no residual use apparent to this City. Councilman Schutte expressed his indecision at the present time; however recognized the possible increase in value of the land at the con- clusion of the Fair, thereby benefitting the County. Councilman Schutte was of the further opinion that the requested resolution would not be committing the City financially. Mayor Chandler advised that the Committee report before the Council was general, and indicates that a final analysis and further study is necessary to determine whether or not we have the ability or desire to have a Fair; the requested resolution merely asks that the County of Orange make this investigation~ Mro Loren McCannon, Administrative Vice President and Assistant Manager of the Fair~ in answer to Councilman Schutte"s question, advised that the $25,000,000, figure is considered a maximum amount~ that this amount was based on revenue versus expenditures for operation. He explained methods of financing through a Non-Profit Corporation-Lease Back arrange- ment~ and the residual benefits accruing to the County. Mro McCannon further reported that in their opinion, the project should be through one public entity, the County of Orange, however it was felt that an expression by the respective cities as to their interest in having a World% Fair was desirable. Mro Ben Schroeder, of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce~ referred to a report, conclusion and recommendation on this matter, made to the City of Anaheim, and advised that the Chamber of Commerce has not changed their stand, and thereupon recommended that the project not be approved by the City Council. At the conclusion of the discussion~ Mayor Chandler called for voice vote on the motion before the Council~ Said motion failed to carry, the vote being as follows: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley and Krein. NOES: COUNClL~EN= Dutton, Schutte and Chandler, ~ RESOLUTION NO, 64R-774: Councilman Du%ton offered Resolution No. 64R-774 for adoption~ expressing support for the Worlds Fair Project° Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM EXPRESSING SUPPORT FOR THE CALIFORNIA WORLD'S FAIR. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCII2~EN: NOES: COUNCIIJ~EN: ABSENT: COUNCII~EN: Duttor~, $chutte and Chandler. Pebley and Krein. None. Mayor Chandler declared Resolution No. 64R-774 duly passed and adopted° CONDITIONAL USE PER~IT NO, 522: Request of Mrs. Hart So Oakden for immediate construction of block wall in accordance with requirement of Conditional Use Permit No. 522, was submitted to the City Planning Commission. The City Planning Commission at their meeting held September 14, 1964, recommended to the City Council that the City Attorney's office investigate said matter. The complaint received by the Planning Commission from Mrs. Oakden, and a letter of explanation of the Church's position and tentative building scheduled, received at open meeting, were submitted and read by Mayor Chandler° 8170 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUIES - October 27~ 1964, 1:30 P,M~ Mrs. Oakden was of the opinion that the required block wall was to be constructed within the 180 day period, this having not been accomplished, requested an explanation. Mrs. Oakden further related the annoyances to the residents caused by the school and church activi%ies~ Mro Geisler reported that the church and school were originally established as a matter of right, without any requirements; however~ a conditional use permit was necessary to expand the facilities, and if the conditional use permit is not exercised, the church can continue their present activities without complying to any of the requirements established in the permit~ He further advised that apparently the expansion has not commenced, as no building permit has been applied for. Mrs~ Oakden reported that the church may never expand the present facilities~ inasmuch as additional property has been acquired~ and the high school classes are now located in a building once used as a convalescent hospital° Mrs. Ruatti~ and Mrs. Duane Hlavnicka, added to the testimony given by Mrs° Oakden relating problems, created by this church and school. Mrs° Oakden advised 'that her inquiry has been answered. The City Attorney was requested to contact the church to endeavor by cooperation to resolve the apparent problem. SIGN REQUEST: Application submitted by Mro Ben Cutter for permission to erect a face sign across front of the building located at 218 West Lincoln Avenue was reviewed together with reports from the Building and Planning Departments. Mro Cutter addressed the Council and reported on the type of lighting to be used, advising %hat the sign will not be a flashing sign~ On mo%icn by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, sign permit was granted as requested. MOIION CARRIEDQ EXECUTIVE SESSION: Councilman Dutton moved for a five minute ExecuZive Session. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. AFTER EXECUTIVE SESSION: The City Council returned to %he Council Chambers and the meeting was called to order by Mayor Chandler~ all members being present with the exception of Councilman Schutteo PLANNING COMMISSION - REMOVAL OF MEMBER: Mayor Chandler reported that it was the unanimous action of the City C..~ncil at the last Executive Session to allow MrQ Chavos an opportunity to resign from the Planning Commission, if he so desired. On the instructions or,the City Council, a meeting with Mr. Chavos was arranged, and the action of the Council rela%ed~ Mr. Chavos declined to resign. Mayor Chandler thereupon advised that Mr. Chavos is hereby removed from the Planning Commission by order of the City Council. RECESS: On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Council meeting was recessed to 7:30 PoM. MOTION CARRIED. (5:30 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order. P RESENT: COUNC I LMEN: ABSENT: PRESENT: Pebiey~ Dutton, Schutte (entered the meeting 9:~2 P.M~) and Chandler. COUNCILMEN: Krein. CITY MANAGER: Keith Ao Murdoch. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene Mo Williams. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis. PLANNING DIRECTOR: Richard Reese. ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER: Ralph O~ Pease. 8171 City Hail, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 27, 1964, 1:30 PLANNING COORDINATOR: Allan Shoff ASSOCIATE PLANNERS: Ronald Grudzinski, Robert Mickelson, FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Chandler led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flago SIGN REQUEST: Application submitted by the Carpet Store requesting permission to erect a free-standing sign at 2110 West Lincoln Avenue, was reviewed by the City Council together with reports from the Building and Planning Departmentso On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, sign permit was granted, subject to no projection over the property line. MOIION CARRIED. ENTERTAINMENI PERMIT: Application filed by Del-Arwin, Inco, for Entertainment Permit to allow live music, supplied by a combo, at the Caravan, 226 North Manchester Avenue, was submitted and granted for one year, subject to the recommendations of the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED~ SIDEWALK WAIVER - 1315 SOUTH STATE iCOLLEGE BOULEVARD: Request of Fed-Mart Ware- house (International Distributing Company) for waiver of sidewalk at 1315 South State College Boulevard, was submitted. On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Pebley moved that temporary waiver of sidewalk requirement be granted, subject to the provision that no permanent planting or permanent type improvements be permitted within the area reserved for future sidewalk. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. SIDEWALK WAIVER - 1510 SOUTH RITA LANE: Request of Adolf and Elena Kaminski for waiver of sidewalk at 1510 South Rita Lane, was submitted. On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved temporary waiver of sidewalk requirement be granted, subject to no permanent planting or permanent type improvements being permitted within the area reserved for future sidewalk; further~ 'that existing unused drive depression and apron be closed with standard curb and gutter. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP, TRACT NO. 5608: Developer, Brattin Construction Coo; tract located south of South Street~ 660 feet east of Sunkist Street, and contains 64 R-1 lots. The City Engineer reported said Final Map conforms substantially with the tentative map previously approved, that bond has been posted and approved, and required fees paid, and he recommended approval of the final map~ On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Dutton moved Final Map, Tract Nco 5608 be approved° Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. FINAL MAP, IRACI NO, 496t: Developer, Bryan Industrial Properties; tract located on the east side of Lemon Street, 825 feet north of Orangethorpe Avenue, and contains 16 lots, zoned M-1 and P-L. The City Engineer reported said Final Map conforms substantially to the tentative map previously amended and approved, that bond has been posted and approved, and required fees paid, and he recommended approval thereof. On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Final Maps Tract No, 4961 was approved, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED. 8172 City Hail, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 27, 1964, 1:30 P,M, RESOLUTION NO, 64R-775: Due to a possible conflict of interest, Mayor Chandler withdrew from the discussion and action on this issue, and Mayor Pro Tem Dutton assumed chairmanship of the meeting. Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-775 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERIAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD A~ PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Leo Freedman) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley and Dutton. NOES: COUNCiLMEN~ Noneo ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte and Krein. ABSIAINED: COUNCILMEN: Chandler. Mayor Pro Tem Dutton declared Resolution No. 64R-775 duly passed and adopted. Mayor Chandler res<~ed chairmanship of the meeting. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman DuLton offered Resolutions Noso 64R-776 to and including 64R-v79 for adoption~ Refer to Resolution Book° RESOLUTION NO~ 64R.~776: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEI~ ACCEPIING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENI FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (3esse Edward and Callie Ao Pruet%) RES.OLUTION NO, 64R.:777: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Stanley L. and Pearl Rosen) RESOLUIION NO. 64R-778~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENr FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (3ames and Velma Wo Emmi) RESOLUTION NO. 64R-779: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERIY FOR EASEMENTS FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY, AND ALLEY AND PUBLIC UTILITY FURPOSES. (Ihe Six Co.) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton and Chandler. Noneo Schutte and Kreino Mayor Chandler declared Resolutions Nos. 64R-776 to 64R-779, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim submitted by Sam B. Beasley, Chief Special Agent, Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company~ for damages purportedly resulting from said company"s cable equipment being struck by utility equipment owned by the City of Anaheim on September 8~ 1964, north side of Orange Avenue~ approximately 213 feet west of Baker Street, was reviewed by the City Council. Said claim was denied and referred to the City Attorney on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. 8173 ~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 27, 1964, 1:30 P,M, QORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley: a. Resolution No. 623 from the City of Westminster requesting the elimina- tion of State Sales Tax on certain items. b. Letter and Resolutions of the Orange County Board of Supervisors requesting support of Propositions A and B that will appear on November general election ballot. c. Letter of congratulations to the City of Anaheim for their accident prevention record of City ~mployees, from State Compensation Insurance Fund. Letter from International Conference of Building Officials expressing appreciation for permitting Mro Homer Wallace to attend the 42nd Annual Business Meeting in Glacier National Park, Montana° eo Resolution No. 469 from the City of Stanton urging support of County Propositions A and B, which will appear on the November 3, 1964 ballot. f. Letter and report from Orange County Associated Chambers of Commerce regarding development of Atwood-Cone Area° MOTION CARRIFJ3. ORDINANCE NO, 2059: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance Nco 2059 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book° AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM A~ENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (59-60-115 - C-2) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2059 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion~ MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton and Chandler. None. Schutte and Krein. Mayor Chandler declared Ordinance No. 2059 duly passed and adopted° ORDINANCE NO, 2061: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance Nco 2061 for final reading~ Refer to Ordinance Book° AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING SECTION 14.20.100 OF CHAPTER 14.20, TITLE 14, OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO ONE-WAY STREETS. (Durst Street, one-way restriction removed) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance Nco 2061 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion~ MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton and Chandler. None° $chutte and Krein. Mayor Chandler declared Ordinance No. 2061 duly passed and adopted. QRDINANCE NO, 2062: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2062 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. 8174 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINU/ES - October 27, 1964, 1:30 P.M. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (59-60-53 - C-i) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2062 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Pebley seconded the motiono MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton and Chandler. None. $chutte and Krein. Mayor Chandler declared Ordinance Nco 2062 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2063: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2063 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book° AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-110 - C-1 and R-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance Nco 2063 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCIIA~EN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton and Chandler. None. Schutte and Kreino Mayor Chandler declared Ordinance No, 2063 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2064: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance Nco 2064 for final reading~ Refer to Ordinance Book° AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-66 - R-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2064 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton and Chandler. NOES: COUNCILMEN: None° ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Schutte and Kreino Mayor Chandler declared Ordinance No. 2064 duly passed and adopted. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO, 64-65-14 AND AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN NO, 10~ Initiated by City Planning Commission to consider change of zone from R-3 and P-1 to C-O~ property located on the west side of Lemon Street between Anaheim Boulevard and Romneya Drive. Public hearing was continued to this date to allow initiation of C-2 Zoning on subject property° C-2 Zoning has been scheduled for public hearing before the City Council November 4, 1964. On motion by Councilman Pebley~ seconded by Councilman Dutton~ public hearing on Reclassification No. 64-65-14 and Area Development Plan No. 10 was continued to November 4, 1964, 7:00 P.M., in conjunction with General Plan Amendment No~ 41. MOTION CARRIED. 8175 ~i'ty Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 27, 1964, 1:30 .PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO, 6~-65-18, CONDITIONAL USE PER~, IT N©, 61.3, G.ENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO, 19 AND TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 5611~ SUbmitted by 3ohn F~ and Mary Kirsch, and Richard G. and Patricia Kampling, request- ing a change of zone from R-A to R-2, and permission to establish one and two-story multiple family residences and associated recreation facilities; requesting waiver of the following provisions: (1) Minimum required front, rear and side yards; (2) Minimum lot size; (3) Minimum distance between main and accessory buildings, Property briefly described as located on the south side of South Street, approximately 1116 feet east of State College Boulevard, comprising 14.7 acres~ The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1364, Series 1964-65, recommended reclassification be denied, and in accordance with Resolution Noo 1365~ Series 1964-65, denied Conditional Use Permit No. 613, and by Resolution No~ 1366, Series 1964-65, recommended disapproval of General Plan Amendment No. 19, and further recommended disapproval of Tentative Map, Tract No. 5611. Mr. Ron Grudzinski noted the location of the property, and called attention to Exhibit ~'C" of Plan Study No. 45-114-4 (Plan Noo 1), a land study of the southeastern area° Attention was also called to an overlay, posted on the General Plan Map, of the proposed amendment heard in conjunc- tion with subject applications. In summarizing the action taken by the City Planning Commission~ attention was called to the Planning Commission minutes and staff reports, and reasons for denial, as contained in City Planning Commission Resolutions heretofore referred to. Letter of protest, setting forth reasons therefor, was submitted by the East Anaheim Home Owners Association~ The Mayor invited the applicants, or their Agent, to address the Council° Mr. Paul Bruns, of Moore, Kempa and Galloway, Inc., Consulting Civil Engineers, representing the applicants and developer~ distributed a brochure containing reduced plans of the development. He advised that the project ~'Beechwood Estates" would be a condominium, or Town House~ type of development~ With the aid of other exhibits, Mr. Bruns compared their project with the normal 7200 square foot residential development, stating that they were endeavoring to combine both types of living in the proposed project. With reference to Lots Nos. 85, 86 and 87, recreational area or common areas, Mro Bruns reported that the recreational areas will be installed and landscaped by the developer~ and maintained by a Home Owners Association; further, the private streets will also be maintained by the developer° He advised that the development comprises 14o5 gross acres, and 12.2 net acres, eighty-four total dwelling units or 5.7 units per gross acre, the density being approximately one additional unit per acre; 168 covered parking spaces or two spaces per unit, and,an additional ten spaces in the recreational area, with 104 spaces on private streets, the size of the units to range from 1,560 square feet to 1,871 square feet. Other exhibits indicated the following: (1) Public right-of-way; (2) Individual ownership; (3) Common area ownership; (4) Typical house floor planso In explaining the appointments planned for the development, Mr. Bruns advised that the price of the homes will range from $27~500. %o $32,500. 8176 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 27, 1964,.1:30 In reviewing the Planning Staff report dated September 28, 1964, Mr. Bruns explained their position on each item contained in the report~ and in finality advised that the only provision not already provided for or corrected accordingly to the report was the requirement for sixty-four foot streets° (Large displays were retained by Mr. Bruns.) Mrs~ Harl Butcher~ 2310 Alden Avenue, representing her husband and also the Hast Anaheim Home Owners Association, referred to the letter of protest filed, and advised that a petition of protest was filed with the Planning Commission° Mrs° Butcher stated their opposition to any development in the area, other than R-l, in accordance with the General Plan, and noted their reasons therefor~ as set forth in said letter° offer. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone had new or additional evidence to Helen Ro Ihompson, 533 Mancos Avenue, advised that in a survey taken by them, it was their understanding that this area would remain single family residential in accordance with the General Plan. With this understanding, they purchased in this area and moved from the Huclid-Ball Road section. Mrs° Thompson further advised that according to the discussions in the area, other vacant land would, in all probability, develop to a higher density~ if the General Plan Amendment was approved~ Mro Paul 3ordan~ purchaser of one of the homes previously referred to as in the $36,000. class, approximately three blocks from subject property, addressed the Council in support of the proposed projecto He stated that R-2 was not necessarily undesirable, and that the value of the homes alone will attract valuable residents. Mro 3ordan further advised that he would be opposed to R-2 in principle, but the proposed development, in his opinion, would upgrade the area. Mro George Garty~ 2241 Hast South Street, advised of his opposi- tion, calling attention to the present heavy traffic conditions in the area. Mr. Joseph Hamer re-emphasized the traffic conditions as explained by Mro Garry, and noted the extreme danger of a trash truck or any vehicle backing out onto South Street. Mro Dick Kampling, 2240 Hast South Street, reported on the modern concepts and changes in Anaheim since his youth. He advised that the pro- posed project is a modern concept in living, and in his opinion, would be the highest and best use of the land. Mr. 3o AG Ieno~ 627 Peregrine Street, reported that the value of the homes of the signers on the petition of protest was less than the cost of the homes planned in subject development. In his opinion~ if a develop- ment of greater value than their homes is constructed, it would not devaluate their property° He reminded the Council that the proposed project was not a standard R-2 Zone~ and that the tract is planned so that protection and privacy is afforded the adjoining subdivision. Regarding the petition of protest, Mr~ Teno reported that many of the signers were of the opinion that this would be strictly apartment houses. Mr. Rusty Roquet, 948 South Peregrine Street, called attention to the possibility of foreclosure, and the lack of a Home Owners Association to maintain the area, as planned. Mr. Roquet further reported that in their area, there are at present, either developed or under construction, 2,043 single family homes, leaving approximately 105 acres in vacant land, which could accommodate an an additional 420 homes~ To change the zoning at this time, when the area 8177 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 27, 1964, 1:30 p,M. is so nearly cOmpletely develOped into single family residences would, in his opinion, be poor judgement. Mro Bruns, in rebuttal, explained the protective steps taken by the State Real Estate Commission, State Corporation Commission, lending institutions, title company and City of Anaheim to insure maintenance of condominium developments through Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions. Mr~ Bruns referred to the minutes of the City Planning Commission and emphasized the appointments planned for the houses, advising that the design of the structures and values would be in conformity and compatible with the surrounding developments, and would not establish a precedent for the undeveloped area, as each proposal would be considered on its own merits. Mr. Richard D~ Harlan, 930 South Peregrine Street, stated that regardless of the quality of the structures proposed, the facts remain that there will be an increased use of the land, the only advantage being the increased value of subject property to the land owner. He further stated that he could see no advantage to the City of Anaheim, and a definite disadvantage to the area involved° In answer to a ladygs question from the audience~ it was reported that nothing would prevent the developer from renting the units, in the even% they did no% se!l. Discussion was held, and it was noted %hat the development as proposed was less in density 'than that permitted in %he R-2 Zone° Con- siderat~n was also given to the estimated increase in population, especially the increased number of children in a medium density development~ as opposed to a single family development. Mro GrudziDski referred to ~he staff report estimating an increase of 420 additional students %o the area, Dased on statistical analysis of similar developments in a typical R-2 Zone° It was noted that the present Code would allow development under R-1 standards~ by reducing the density from approximately 7.9 to 6 per acre~ and the same condominium concept could be accomplished by a conditional use permit for a planned residential development. There being no further discussion, Mayor Chandler declared the hearing closed° The City Council in general, approved the planned residential development concept, but disapproved any deviation in streets, sewers, etc. RESOLUTION NO~ 64R-780: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-780 for adoption~ denying without prejudice Reclassification No. 64-65-18. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL O[ THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- ~INING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED° (64~65-18) Roll call vote: AYES~ COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton and Chandler. None° $chutte and Krein. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-780 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-781: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-781 for adoption~ denyin9 without prejudice Conditional Use Permit No. 613o Refer to Resolution Book~ 8178 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES ~ October 27~ 1964, 1:30 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDI/IONAL USE PERMI/ NO~ 613. Roll call vote: AY£S: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton and Chandler. None° Schutte and Krein. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-781 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO, 64R-782: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-782 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DISAPPROVING AN A~ENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS A~£NDMENT NOn 19. (64-65-18) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley~ Dutton and Chandler. None. $chutte and Krein~ The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 64R=781 duly passed and adoptedo TENTATIVE MAP NO, 5611~ REVISION NO. 3: Tract containing approximately 14.7 acres, proposed for subdivision into 84, R-2 Zoned lotso On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, Tentative Map of Tract Noo 561i, Revision Noo 3~ was denied without prejudice. MOTION CARRIED° RECESS: Councilman Dutton moved for a fifteen minute recess. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED° (9:15 P.Mo) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order, all members of the Council being present with the exception of Councilmen Schutte and Krein. PUBLIC HEARING~ RECLASSIFICA/ION NO, 64~65=26: Submitted by Modern Containers~ Inc.~ The Berada Corp~, The Edmo COrpo~ and Ada Martin Investment Company~ requesting change of zone from R-A to R-i~ property briefly described as located on the west side of Sunkist Street~ between Banyan Court and Belmont Court° /he City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1331, Series 1964~65~ recommended said reclassification~ subject to the following conditions: 1. That the owner of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 30 feet in width~ from the center line of the street, along Sunkist Street, for street widening purposes° 2o That the sidewalks shall be installed along Sandalwood Court and Sunkist Street as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City £ngineer~ prior to final building inspection. 3. That vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings, to Sunkist Street shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim° 4o That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Sunkist Street, Banyan Street, Sandal- wood Court and Belmont Court for tree planting purposes. 5o That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit~ to be used for park and recreation purposes~ said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued~ 6. That a Record of Survey to record the approved division of subject property be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 8179 ~ity Hail, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 27, 1964~ 1:30 7. That Condition Nos° 1, 3, 4, and 6, above mentioned~ shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 8, That plans for development of subject property be subject to the approval of Development Review. (Councilman Schutte entered the meeting, 9:42 P.M.) Communication submitted by Gibralter Homes, requesting waiver of the requirement to sink the well, was further explained by Mr. Bob Mickelson, who reported that the pump site extends approximately five feet into the lot area~ and would affect normal setback requirements. Report from the Planning Department was submitted and read by Mro Murdoch, wherein it was recommended that the public hearing be continued one week to further investigate the ownership of the thirty foot-wide strip, and also the condition of the pump. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, public hearing on Reclassification No. 64-65-26 was continued to November 1964, 7:00 PoM. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO, 64-65-27 - TENTATIVE TRAC.T NO, 5703: Submitted by Warren W. 3aycox requesting change of zone from M-1 to R-3, property briefly described as located west of East S%reet~ bounded on the East by the Orange County Flood Control Channel, on the South by the Orange County Flood Control Retarding Basin, and on the West by the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad right-of-way° The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution Nco 1332, Series 1964-65, recommended reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a Final Tract Map of subject property be approved by the City Council and recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 2. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recrea- tion purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 3o That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 40 That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. I through 6, provided~ however~ that 10-foot wide garages be provided and that elevation plans be subject to approval of Develop- ment Review~ and that the exterior materials be stucco and shake roofs, as stipulated by the petitioner° The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council either for or against the proposed reclassification. Mr. Cal Quer¥1~ of McDaniel Engineering Company~ addressed the Council requesting permission to add a one-foot Lot "A" along the north boundary of the tract in order to recover one-half of %he cost of the construction of the alley when the property %o the North develops. Mr. Ralph Pease advised that an easement is shown along the east side of the tract across the Flood Control Channel, and it was the recom- mendation of the Engineering Division that subject easement be dedicated for public purposes. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council~ there being no response~ declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-783: Councilman Dutton offered Resolut~n No. 64R-783 for adoption~ authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested~ subject %o the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and further subject to the dedication to the City of Anaheim of the private easement across the Flood Control Channel connecting with Balsam Avenue. 8180 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES- October 27~ 1964, 1:30 P.M, Refer to Resolution Booko A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (64-65-27 - R-l) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandlero None° Krein. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-783 duly passed and adopted. TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO, 5703: Tentative Map, Tract Nog 5703 encompassing property described in Reclassification Nog 64-65-27, containing 21 proposed R-3 lots. The City Planning Commission recommended said tentative map, subject to the following conditions: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract Nog 5703 is granted subject to the approval of Reclassification Nog 64-65-27° 3o /hat the alley cut-offs shall conform to Standard Plan No~ 130o 4o That the drainage shall be handled in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer and to the approval of the Orange County Flood Control District. On motion by Councilman Dut%on~ seconded by Councilman Pebley~ Tentative Map~ Tract No. 5703~ was approved~ subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, and further subject to the retention of the Lot ~A", one foot in width~ along the northerly boundary of subject tract, and the filing of an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication of Lot "A"' at a pre- determined cost upon the payment of the proportionate costs for alley construction° MOTION CARRIEDo PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFiCA/ION NO~ 64~65-29 AND CONDI/iONAL USE PERMI/ NO, 625: Initiated by the Cfly Planning Commission to consider reclassification of property from C-3 %o the C-i Zone, in order to zone the property to conform with the existing use of said land, briefly described as located at the northwest corner of Ball Road and Magnolia Street; and also %o consider granting Conditional Use Permit No. 625 permitting the operation of a service station within 75 feet of an R-1Zone~ The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution Nog 1338, Series 1964=65, recommended reclassification unconditionally, and pursuant %o Resolution No. 1339~ Series 1964-65~ granted Conditional Use Permit No. 625 unconditionally° The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council for or against said applications, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO, 64R-784: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 64R-784 fcr adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, and as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-29 - C-l) 8181 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 27, 1964, 1:30 .P,M, Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES ~. COUNC I LMEN: ABSENT: COUNCII~EN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler, None. Krein. The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 64R-784 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO, 64R-785: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 64R-785 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 625~ as recommended by the City Planning Commission~ Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERI, IT NO. 625. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton~ $chutte and Chandler° None. Krein. The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 64R-785 duly passed and adopted° PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO, 64-65-30 AND CONDITIONAL USE PER~IT NO. 626: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission to consider a change of zone from C-3 to C-l, and permission to operate a service station within 75 feet of an R-A residential structure, property located at the southwest corner of Ball Road and Magnolia Streeto The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1340~ Series 1964-65, recommended said reclassification unconditionally, and pursuant to Resolution No~ 1341~ Series 1964-65, granted Conditional Use Permit Noo 626 unconditionally. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council either for or against said applications, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO, 64R-786: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 64R-786 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUIION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-30 - C.-1) Roll cai! vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN~ Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler° COUNCILMEN: None° COUNCILMEN: Krein. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-786 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUIION NO, 64R-787: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 64R-787 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 626 as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PER, II NO. 626. 8182 City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 27, 1964, 1:30 p,M, Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton~ Schutte and Chandler° None. Krein. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-787 duly passed and adopted, PUBLIC HE~RING, RECLASSIFICATION NO~ 64-65-31: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission to consider a change of zone from R-A to C-l, property located at the northeast corner of Ball Road and Magnolia Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1342, Series 1964-65, recommended said reclassification, unconditionally. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Counci!~ there being no response, declared 'the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO~ 64R-788: Councilman Dutton offered. Resolution Nco 64R-788 authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance, changing the zone as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Booko A RESOLUTION OF THE CIIY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND /HAT /HE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-31 - C-i) Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schut%e and Chandler, COUNCILMEN: None. COUNCILMEN: Krein. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-788 duly passed and adopted° PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO, 64-65-32: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission to consider a change of zone from R~.A to C-i~ property located a% the southeast corner of Ball Road and Magnolia Street~ The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution Nco 1343, Series 1964-65, recommended said reclassification unconditionally. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council, either for or against said application~ there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO, 64R-789~ Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 64R-789 authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended by the City Planning Commission° Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-32 - C-l) Roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler. COUNCILMEN: None. COUNCILMEN: Kreln. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-789 duly passed and adopted° 8183 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES -.October 27, 1964, PUBLIC HEARING, RECLASSIFICATION NO, 64-65-34: Initiated by the AnaheiTM planning Commission to consider a change of zone from R-3 to R-A, property located adjacent to the Brookhurst 3unior High School, on the north side of Crescent Avenue and bounded on the West and South by Ventura Street, and Greenacre Avenue. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution Nco 1344, Series 1964-65, recommended said reclassification unconditionally. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council either for or against said reclassification, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO, 64R-790: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 64R-790 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended by the City Planning Commission° Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES oF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED, (64-65-34 - R-A) Roll call vote~ AYES: NOES: AB SENT '. COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler. COUNCILMEN: None° COUNCILMEN: Kreino The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-790 duly passed and adopted. RECLASSIFICATION NO, 65-64-69 - Qp<OINANCE NO. 2057: Revised plans together with reports from the Planning and Engineering Departments were reviewed by the City Council° Mr. Geisler reported that the thirty-foot strip of City-owned property has been eliminated from the plans, and with the approval of revised plans and the private street shown thereon, the necessity of compliance with Condition Nco 5 as set forth in Resolution of Intention will be no longer required. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, revised plans and private street shown thereon were approved. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2057: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2057 for final reading. Refer to Resolution Book° AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (63-64-69 - R-3 and C-O) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2057 and having knowledge of the contents thereof, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived° Councilman Pehley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED° Roll call vote: AYES~ NOES: ABSENT~ COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler, COUNCILMEN: None. COUNCILMEN: Krein. Mayor Chandler declared Ordinance No. 2057 duly passed and adopted. 8184 C%%y Hall, Anaheim, C~lifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 27, 1964, 1:30 P,M, PURCHASE - EQUIPMENT: Mr. Murdoch reported on informal bids received for one, one-half ton and three, three-quarter ton chassis only, and recommended the acceptance of the low bid, as follows: One-half ton - McCoy Motor Company, $1,920.04 Three-quarter ton - International Harvester, $1,856.32 each On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, purchase was authorized from the low bidders, as recommended~ MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE - FIRE STATION SITE NO~ 7: Mr~ Murdoch reported on the various site locations considered for Fire Station No. 7, and recommended that a portion of the Toussau property 130 feet by 203 feet, located on the south side of Ball Road east of State College Boulevard, be acquired for the purchase price of $27,$000 Mr. Murdoch further advised that the acquisition of the property carries a condition that the City improve an alleyway thirty feet in width along the east property line, which will cost between $1,500. and $1,700., said alleyway to serve the Fire Station site, as well as the balance of the Tousseau property~ On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Manager was authorized to negotiate terms and enter into an escrow for the purchase of the Tousseau property, as recommended° MOTION CARRIED. CONVENTION FACILITY SITE: Mro Murdoch reported on the status of the original site selected for the convention facility, located on the south side of Katella Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and West Street° He advised that for the convention site, the Architect has recommended a forty-acre parcel, and further advised that in order to clear the encumbrances on the fifty- five acre parcel, it would be necessary to acquire fee title and pay the encumbrances on the property fronting Harbor Boulevard. Mro Murdoch presented a map of the fifty-five acre site indicating the center forty acres as the logical location for the facility~ the balance of the property to be used for parking and related purposes~ the total amount of money to acquire fee title to be approximately $4,468~000. Director of Finance report regarding funds necessary to obtain the property was submitted and discussed; the method of payment included funds currently under bonds for the Anaheim Stadium, and also the reanalysis and rescheduling of certain other public improvements not involving bond funds. Mr~ Murdoch reported that the delay would not be excessive nor a serious problem, as there was sufficient flexibility to carry out all pro- grams scheduled° Discussion was held concerning a possible easement for drainage to Walnut Street, which at this time was not a part of the transaction° Also discussed was the lease with Douglas Oil Company on the Harbor Boule- vard frontage° Mro Geisler was of the opinion that a clear title to the property could be obtained~ R£SOLUTION NO, 64R-791: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 64R-791 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND DIRECTING /HE ACQUISITION BY EBINENT DOMAIN OF REAL PROPERTY FOR CIVIC CONVENTION CENTER PURPOSES. (Mauerhan property) 8]85 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October. 27. 1964. 1:30 P.M. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton~ Schutte and Chandler, None. Krein. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-791 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO, 64R-79~: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 64R-792 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLU/ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR AND DIRECTING THE ACQUISITION BY F~INENT DOMAIN OF REAL PROPERTY FOR CIVIC CONVENTION CENTER PURPOSES. (Zahl property) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, $chutte and Chandler. None. Krein. The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-792 duly passed and adoPted~ ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICAIIONS: The following applications before the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board were submitted for Council information~ (a) Person to Person Transfer of On-Sale Beer License, submitted by Del- Arwin~ Incorporated~ dba Blue Dolphin~ 401 South Lemon Street (C-2 Zone )o (b) Person to Person Transfer of On-Sale Beer License, submitted by Eugene Raymond O~Brien~ Nine Twenty Seven Club, 927 North Anaheim Boulevard (C-2 Zone)~ No action was taken by the City Council on the above applications. !RAILER PERMIT - GOLDEN WEST BASEBALL CLUB~ On the recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved that permit be granted to the Golden West Baseball Club to use two~ forty-foot trailers as temporary offices until completion of the Anaheim Stadium. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO, 64R-793: Councilman Dui/on offered Resolution No. 64R-793 for adoption° Refer to Resolution Book° A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE DEPOSIT OF CERTAIN SUMS IN COURT TO INSURE IMMEDIATE POSSESSION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY. (Wagner property) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley~ Dutton~ Schutte and Chandler. None. Kreino The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-793 duly passed and adopted. TRACT NO. 3823 - STORM DRAIN AGREEMENT~ On the recommendation of the City Engineer, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton~ storm drain through Tract No. 3823 to serve said tract and replace public drain, in the estimated amount of $25~525.30 was approved, and the City Attorney authorized to prepare necessary contract on the basis of fifty per cent of actual cost of said construction~ to be paid by the City of Anaheim° MOTION CARRIED. 8186 CitY Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 27, 1964, 1:30 P,M, LEASE AGRF~MENT - CITY ATTORNEY OFFICES: On the recommendation of the City Attorney, a three year lease agreement commencing November 1, 1964, for office space occupied by the City Attorney's staff in the Kraemer Building under the same terms and conditions, with the addition of one additional room, was authorized and the City Attorney directed to prepare lease agreement accordingly, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebleyo MOTION CARRIEDo pROCLAmAtiON: Mayor Chandler proclaimed the period of November 20 to 26, 1964, Farm-City Week° LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION CON~ISSION: Notice of meetings to be held by the League of California Cities for the purpose of considering the evaluation of the performance, and suggestions for legislative changes for 1965, pertaining to the Local Agency Formation Commission, was submitted. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the Mayor and representative from the City Attorney"s office, were authorized to attend the meeting scheduled to be held in San Diego, November 10, 1964. MOTION CARRIED. EXECUTIVE SESSION~ It was reported that the Stadium Commission has requested an Executive Session with the City Council for the purpose of discussing the confidential features of employment and information received specified to be confidential in nature, relative to the employment of a Stadium Concess- ionaireo ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Schutte moved to adjourn to November 4, 1964, 11:00 AoM., and also moved waiver of further notice of said adjournment. Councilman Dutton seconded %he motion° MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 11: 15 P.M~ - x City Clerk QitY Hall~ Anaheim, California .- COUNCIL MINUTES - November 4~ 1964, 11:00 A~M, /he City' Council of the City of Anaheim met in adjourned regular session~ PRESENT~ COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Krein and Chandler° ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley and Schutteo Mayor Chandler called the meeting to ordero EXECUTIVE $5SSION: On motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the Council adjourned into Executive Session for the purpose of meeting with the Stadium Commission to review confidential information accompanying bids for the Stadium Concessionaireo MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: The City Council returned to the Council Chamber, and on motion by Councilman Krein, seconded by Councilman Dutton, adjourned said meeting. MOTION CARRIED. AD3OURNED: 12:00 Noon. ~ City Clerk