Loading...
1964/11/248229 City Hall. Anaheim.. California -.CQU~IL MINUTES-..November .24, 1964. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT~ ABSENTa PRESENT~ COUNCIL~N~ Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler. COUNCILN~N~ Kreino CITY N~ANAG~Rs Keith A. Murdoch. CITY ATTORN£Y~ Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERKt Dens M, Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. PLANNING DIRECTORs Richard Reese. ZONING COORDINATOR~ Martin Kreidt. ASSOCIATE PLANNERs Robert Mtckelson. Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order. .MINUISS~ On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, minutes of the Anaheim City Council meetings held November 4 and 10~ 1964, were approved. MOTION CARRIED. R~SOLUIION NO.. 64R,837: Councilman Pehley offered Resolution No, 64R-837 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF DENL~NDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF NOVEMBER 24, 1964. (Warrants Nos. 35,414 to 35,683, both inclusive, totaling $802,643,56) Roll call vote: AYES~ COUNCILM~N: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, and Chandler NOES~ COUNCIL~N~ None ABSENT~ COUNCIL~N: Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-837 duly passed and adopted, q.QNTINUED PUBLIC H~R!~G ~. NATURAl. RESOURCE§. ANP CON~E~YATIQN ZONE..I Public hearing on proposed amendment to Title 18. Chapter 18.61 of the Anaheim Municipal Code~ "NRC, Natural Resources and Conservation Zone"~ was continued from ehe meetings of September 15 and 29~ and October 27~ '1964, for further report and recommendations from the City Planning Commission. The City Clerk read letter received November 24, 1964, from Sully-Miller Contracting Company requesting a 60day continuance of public hearing, advising said request has met with approval hy {he Orange County Water District. Also noted was excerpt, from the City Planning Commission's meeting held November 9, 1964, concerning the Commission's consideration of revised draft of NRC standards, which has been continued to January 4, 1965~ for further study of the new information. On motion hy Councilman Dutton, seconded h¥ Councilman Schutte, public hearing on proposed amendment to Title 18, Chapter 18.61 of the Anaheim ~unictpal Code "NRC - Natural Resources and Conservation Zone" was continued to January 26, 1965, 1~30 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. pUBLIO.' HEARING - SIGN ORDINANCE, Public hearing was held on proposed amendment to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code hy adding thereto Chapter 18.62, relating to signs, advertising signs and structures. Report from {he City Attorney was briefed hy Deputy City Attorney Furman Roberts (copies furnished each Councilman). Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the Council. ~r. Ed Cronan, Executive Director, California Electric Sign Association, referred to the proposed sign ordinance in its present form, being of the opinion that the Ordinance was an objective one, both on the part of the City and the industry. 8230 City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 24. 1964. 1130 P,M, He was of the opinion the proposed over-all maximum height limitation of 50 feet for free standing signs was somewhat restrictive, in the light of proposed Chapter 18.62.090 (h) (2), and that a 75 foot over- all maximum height limitation would he more practical. Regarding signs projecting over the public right of way, Cronan cited the California State Law graduated standard for allowable projections up to a maximum of five feet. Mr. Cronan further recommended that a graduated set of standards he formulated for roof signs, as he felt the proposed 25 foot maximum'height above grade was unrealistic. The N43yor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the puhiic hearing closed. At the conclusion of lengthy discussion by the City Council, City Manager and City Attorney, the City Attorney was directed to make the follow- ing amendments to the ordinance, as proposedl (a) Section 18.62.030 (f) Projecting Signs (definition to be re-worded) (b) Section 18.62.070 (3) "and maintained" added (c) Section 18.62.080 (4) "if City Council permission is first obtained for such projecting sign" added (d) Section 18.62.090 (b) (3) ~'50-feet" changed to "70-feet" (e) Section 18.62.090 (d) "In no event shall the highest portion of any roof sign exceed a height of 25 feet from the roof of the structure on which said sign is placed" added (f) Section 18.62.090 (e):"If City Council permission is first obtained for such projecting sign" added (g) Section 18.62.100 (B) (3) "Regulating Service Stations" added Planning Coordinator Allan Shoff reported on surveys made by the Planning Department using representative signs, comparing applications for sign permits during 1963 with those submitted between January 1~ 1964 through September 15, 1964o He advised that during the eight and one-half month 1964 period, no sign applications requested a height exceeding sixty feet. RECES. Ss Councilman Dutton moved for a fifteen minute recess. Councilman Schutte Seconded the motion. ~OTION CARRIED. (3:02 PON.) AFTER REGE~: Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order, ail members of the City Councii being present with the exception of Councilman Kretn. OR~II~.NGE NO. 2072: Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2072, as amended, for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF TIlE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO CHAPTER 18.62, RELATING TO SIGNS, ADVER- TISING SIGNS AND STRUCTURES. After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2072 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moVed the reading in full of said Ordinance he waived. Councilman Pehle¥ seconded the motion.. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. .PUIj{~!O H~ING,,,- AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODEI Public hearing was scheduled this date to consider amendment to Title 18, Chapter 18.04, General Provisions - Use - Parking, hy the addition thereto of Section 18.04.030(h-13) Churches. 8231 ~it¥ Hall. Anah..~.~m, California' - COUNCIL .~IN .UT.ES. - No~[e~e.r 24~ 1964.1 1,30 .P.M. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the public hearing closed. Nit. Martin Kreidt briefed the amendment as proposed, advising_ that although Section 18.04.030 provides a minimum of one parking space for every ten seats for churches and other places of occasional assembly, it has been the City's policy to require a minimum of one parking space for every five seats for church developments. The proposed amendment would formalize the church parking ratio policy of the City. O~DIN~N~E NO~ 207~ Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2073 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18, CHAPTER 18.04, SECTION 18o04.030 PARAGRAPH (b) OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO ZONING° (Parking requirements - School and Churches) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2073 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said Ordinance he waived. Councilman Pehley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ~NIE~T6IN~NT PERMIT.~ T~{~ QAI~CAN. 1224 SOUTH BROOKHURSI STREET, Action hy the City Council on entertainment permit to allow exhibition popular dancing with one or two employees participating, at The Can Can, 1224 South Brookhurst Street, was tabled from the meeting of November 4, 1964, and further continued from the meeting of November 10, 1964, to allow the applicant an opportunity to contact the Chief of Police relative to his recommended denial of said permit. The City Clerk reported that upon checking with the Chief of Police~ it was learned that the applicants have not made further contact with his office. On motion hy Councilman $chutte, seconded by Councilman Duttog, said entertainment permit wa~ denied in accordance with recommendations~' of the Chief of Police. MOTION CARRIED. ~IGN~REQU~$T ~ AMI~RIGA~ TIRE. qOMPANYi INC. o: Application submitted by American Tire Coo, Inc., requesting permission to erect a free-standing, revolving sign at 2222 South Harbor Boulevard, denied October 6, 1964, hy the City Council was scheduled for re-consideration this date at the request of the applicant. ~{r. Ken Michael, 1301 South Lynwood, La Habra, representing Heath and Company, Sign Contractor, displayed a model of the proposed ~ s%gn, and called attention to the business loss suffered as result of removing painted signs from the building, which was done tO show good faith, since the purpose of the sign requested was to upgrade the store, as part of an improvement program for American Tire Companies. He explained their business operation and association with the White Front Store, and noted 'that the sign was not to be installed to attract ~raffic from the street, but as means of identification within the shopping complex. For this reason, they did not wish 'to integrate the sign with the existing White Front Sign on the center frontage of the property. Discussion was held by the City Council, and in answer to Council questioning, Nit. Michael stated that the sign was adaptable to mounting on the roof of the buiiding, if desired. Counciimen Dutton and Pebiey were of the opinion that to grant subject sign permit wouid establish a precedent for simiiar requests on service station sites. References made to the existing pole sign in front of the service station, adjacent to the tire store, and N[r. Michael stated that although wording on said sign refers only to White Front Store, its purpose is to identify the service station! that said sign could he removed as a condition of granting subject sign permit. He submitted photographs of the tire 8232 City Hall, .Anaheim. California., COMNCIL MI~f~rrEs - November 24~ 1964. 1130 P.M. Store for council review, illustrating the appearance of the building with its former advertising removed. Mr. £d Cronan addressed the Council calling attention to the fact that there are two parcels of land included in subject property, and under the sign ordinance which had its first reading this date, the requested sign would he allowable. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Peble¥, sign permit was granted conditional upon its conformance with the sign ordinance on which first reading was held this date, and as interpreted h¥ the City Attorney. MOTION CARRIED. $IG~ R~QU~ST~ Application submitted by Anaheim Appliance Parts, requesting permission to erect a free standing sign at 1777 West Lincoln Avenue, was reviewed h¥ the City Council together with reports from the Building and Planning Departments. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, said sign permit was granted, conditional upon its conformance with the sign ordinance on which first reading was held this date, and as interpreted~ hy the City Attorney. MOTION CARRIED. ~A_H~IM~I~OWNTOWN ASSOCIATI~4 - CHRIST.MAS PROGRAM: Communication dated November 13, 1964, from A1Marcoux of the Anaheim Downtown Association, requesting permission to close South Lemon Street between Oak Street and Lincoln Avenue, between the hours of slx and ten P.~o, for a two hour Christmas entertainment program on Friday and Saturday, Dece~er 11 and 12, 1964, was submitted. On the recommendations of the Chief of Police, Councilman Pebley moved said request he granted. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion, ~OTION CARRIED. RECLA$$IF.IGA~IO~ ~0~ 63-64T22 (TENTATIME IRAQI NO. 5~489) r. ~.~.NA~ PLANS, Final plans Submitted by Farrow DeveloPment Corporation, pursuant to Condition No. 6~ Resolution No. 63R=1022, approving R=3 zoning on property described in Reclassification No. 63-64~22 (Tentative Tract No. 5489) were reviewed by the City Council together with recommendations of the City Engineer and Planning Department. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, Final Plans marked Exhibits Nos. 1 through 14, Revision No. 2, were approved. MOTION CARRIED. RfCLASSIFIGATION NO. 60-61-35~ Communication dated October 29, 1964, from John V. Hultquist requesting amendment to deed restrictions recorded as condition of Reclassification No. 60-61-35, to permit operation of an automobile body shop, was submitted together with reports from the City Engineer and Planning Department. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the City Clerk was authorized to schedule the matter for public hearing before the City Council, as recommended h¥ the Planning Department. MOTION CARRIED. RE~..LASSIFIG~TION .NO. 63-64-80 - EXTENSION OF TI~ Request of Everett E. Dean, received October 22, 1964, was submitted for 180 day extension of time to Reclassification No. 63-64-80, together with reports from the City Engineer and Planning Department. 180 day extension of time was granted by the City Council, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman pebley, MOTION CARRIED. REqLAS$IFIG.,.AT!O,N NO, 63-64~114 AND CONDITIONAl, USE PEI$~II NQ, 561 - EXTENSION OF TI.~.:. Request of David W. Hook, dated October 21, 1964, was submitted for 180 day ....... extension of time to Reclassification No. 63-64-114 and Conditional Use Permit No. 561. 180 day extension of time was granted by the City Council, on motion hy Councilman Dutton, seconded hy Councilman Pehle¥. MOTION CARRIED. 8233 ~,ity Hall, Anaheim, Cal~0qqia~- COUNCIL MINUT£$,- Nov~mJ3e,r 24, 1,~6q,~ 1:30, ,p~M-! CONDITIONAL USE' PERMIT NO~ 322 - EXTENSION OF TIME~ Request.dated November 2, 1964, from Jack Lincoln, Attorney for Sheldon Chasin, lessee of property described in Conditional Use Permit No~ 322, requesting a six month extension of time to said conditional use permit, for compliance with certain conditions, pursuant to Resolution No. 63R-2. Reports from the Planning Department noted that Conditional Use Permit No. 322 was granted by the City Council on January 2, 1963~ for a period of 180 days, and that an extension of time from July 1~ 1963 was not requested. Dedication for street widening has been made, however other conditions were not met. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-838: Reference was made to Section 18,64,040 of the Anaheim Municipal Code and noted was the fact that requested extension of time could not be legally granted. Thereupon, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-838 for adoption, declaring Resolution No.. 63R-2 null and void. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH.CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 322 AND DECLARING RESOLUTION NO. 63R-2 NULL AND VOIDo Roll call vote~ AYES ~ C OUNC I LMEN ~ NOES: COUNC ILM~N~ ABSENT: COUNCILMEN~ Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-838 duly passed and adopted. I~ROP~RD AME. NDMENT TO TITLE ~8~ Discussion was held regarding the time limit and authorized extension thereof as applied to Variances and Conditional Use Permits. At the conclusion thereof, the City Attorney was requested toprepare an amendment to the Anaheim Municipal Code extending the period to 12 months, with right of extension for an additional 12 months that can he granted either before or after the expiration of the first 12 month period. T~NTATIVE TRACT NO~ 5439 - EXTENSION OF TIME~ Request of Clarence Clark dated November 3, 1964, for extension of time to Tentative Tract No. 5439, was submitted together with reports from the City Engineer and Planning Department (62-63-38) One year extension of time from December 31, 1964, was grante~ by the City Council, on motion hy Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman S~hutte. MOTION CARRIED. P~$OLUTION NO. 64R-839 - JOB NO. 1304~ Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 64R-839 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEN£~NT, TO WIT: THE LINCOLN AVENUE SEWER I~PROVEMENT, FRO~ APPROXI~TELY 325 FEET EAST OF BEACH BOULEVARD TO APPROXIMATELY 994 FEET EAST OF BEACH BOULEVARD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 1304~ APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF! AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE- INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened December 17, 1964, 2:00 PoMo) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNC IL~EN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSEN/: COUNC II,tEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein 8234 Citw Hall. Anaheim, Ga~$fo~nia - COUNCIL MINUIE~ -.Nqye~er 24., 1964. 1,30 P.a. The Mayor declared Resolution No, 64R-839 duly passed and adopted, RESOLt~T[ON~O~ ~4R-~40 ~ JOB NOe 8~8z Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No, 64R-840 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE CO~PLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, ~AATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORNtANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND CON[PLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT z THE LINCOLN AVENUE ~EDIAN ISLAND RECONSTRUCTION, APPROXINtATELY 996 FEET W~$T OF EUCLID STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 30B NO. 898. (Ro 3. Noble) Roll call votez AYES z COUNCILMEN: NOE$~ GOUNC II~EN ~ ABSENT ~ COUNC II~N ~ Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None K~ein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-840 duly passed and adopted, RE~OL~rION NO~ $4R-841 ~ JOB NO, 745: Upon receipt of certification from the DirectOr of Public Works, Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 64R-841 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACC~.PTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SER¥IG]:.S, ~ATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANC£ OF ALL WORK NF. CESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPI~TE THE FOLLO~ING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT~ THE IMPROVEMENT OF SAGE PARK PARKING LOT, NORTH-EAST CORNER LIDO LANE AND LIDO PLACE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, 30B NO. 745. (John W. Tiedemann Co.) Roll call vote~ AYES ~ COUNC IL~EN ~ NOES~ COUNCILMEN: ABS~-NT ~ COUNC ILMENz Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-841 duly passed and adopted, RESOLUTION.NO,. 6.4R-842~ Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No, 64R-842 for adoption. Refer to'Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANA~IM ACCEPTING THE DEDICATION OF VEHIGULAR ACCESS RIGHTS .~RO~$ CERTAIN PROPERTY ON HARBOR BOUL~¥ARD AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF TEMPORARY ACCESS RIGHT~ IN CONNECTION THEREWITH° (63-64-82 - Cedric White) Roll call vote~ AYESz COUNCILN~N~ Peble¥, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler NOES~ COUNCILMEN~ None ABSENTt COUNCIIJ~N~ ]<rein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-842 duIy passed and adopted. O~DS .OF EASE~NTz Councilman Schutte offered Resolutions Nos, 64R-843 to 64R-847, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. 8235 .City Hall. Ap~he%~., Ca. lifLo.~nia' ~ .gOUNCIL M, INUTES -Nov. e.m~er 24..,. !~.64., 1.:30 P,M, RE~OL.U~ION NO, ~4R=~.$: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY pURpoSES. (Kent F. and Mary M. Campbell, and Gordon L. and Frances Elizabeth Hodge) ~ESQLtrrION..NO, ~4~-844, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PuRpOSEs. (Bige E, and Bessie M, Gardner) ~E$OLUTION NO. 64R~845: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF.THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Stanton Community Church) ~ESOLUTION ,NO, ~4~=,,84~ ~ ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR RO~ A~ P~LIC ~IL~Y P~P~ES. (John Hancock Mu%ual Life Insurance Company) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RESOLUTION NO. 64R-~47~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Robert W. and Mary Ann Wadleigh) Roll call vote: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein AYES: COUNCILMEN, NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 64R-843 to 64R-847, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. CIrAI~. AGAINST THE.CITY.: The following claims against the City were denied and referred to the City Attorney, on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded hy Councilman Schutte: (a) Claim submitted by Don Thomas Jeffries for damages to his vehicle purportedly resulting from striking an unmarked hole in the pavement on State College Boulevard, approximately 250 feet south of Cerritos Avenue, on August 26, (h) Claim filed hy Norman W. Gordon on behalf of Michael Stoeffler, for injuries purportedly resulting from a fall from a stadium on August 20, 1964. MOTION CARRIED. .M~TROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT RATE SCHEDULE: Metropolitan Water District Resolution No. 6600 confirming rates established for the years commencing July 1, 196~, 1965 and 1966, and adopting water rates to be effective July 1, 1967, was ordered received and filed, on motion by Councilman'Dutton, seconded.by Councilman Pebley. MO/ION CARRIED. CORRE$PONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed,~. on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley: a. Letter from Muriel P. Snow thanking Street Department for mounted street signs at intersections, b. Resolution No. 2386 of City of Orange urging that provision be made for ballot voting at the Annual United States Conference of Mayors. c. Minutes = Anaheim Stadium Commission meeting of November 5, 1964, MO/ION CARRIED° A~OHOLIQ BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION (CONDITIONAL USE pERMIT NO, 6~0, RE- CLASS, IFICATION NO,, 62=63~7_~): Communication received from A~n~ho'ny~ De Piano was submitted, requesting Council consideration of Conditional Use Permit No. 650 this date, although the matter normally he scheduled for City 8236 ~ity Hall, ~nah.ei~., ta~ifp~n~a - COUNCIL MIN.UTES - Noyem~e.r 24~.. 1964. 1130 Council information and consideration December 15, 1964. It was noted that Alcoholic Beverage License application filed hy Mr. De Piano for subject property, was protested by the City of Anaheim on the basis of improper zoning, pursuant to Council action of October 20, 1964, Conditional Use Permit No. 650 requested permission for on. sale beer and wine, in conjunction with existing Italian restaurant (Dee's Restaurant, 1750 West Lincoln Avenue), and further requested permission to amend C-1 deed restrictions filed on subject property as condition of Reclassification No. 62-63-75. The City Planning Commission, on November 23, 1964, granted said conditional use permit and recommended deed restrictions he amended to permit the use, as requested, The City Council determined that it was not their intent to order a review of the action taken hy the City Planning Commission on Conditional Use Permit No. 650; and if no appeal is filed within the twenty-two day appeal period, the City would withdraw its protest against the Alcoholic Beverage License application.' The City Attorney was instructed to so inform the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board. CO~IT!O.NA~ U$~. pERMIT NO~ 562: Communication dated November 20, 1964, from Tom A. Ballas, was submitted and read, requesting permission to use a 12-foot h¥ 52-foot trailer as a sales office for mobile homes at 2931 West Lincoln Avenue (trailer sales established pursuant to Conditional Use Permit No. 562, granted hy the City Council June 3, 1964). Mr. Daniel W~ Holden, 612 Janes Way, Attorney representing the applicants, stated that the trailer would be used as a sales office as long as mobile sales are conducted on the property. He advised that the use proposed was noted and shown on renderings submitted in connection with Conditional Use Permit No. 562. Plan and the file were reviewed by the City Council together with large rendering presented hy Mr. Holden. It was noted hy the City Council that no permanent use of mobile offices for any type of sales have been previously permitted. Mr. Tom Ballas, 309 North Mountainview Place, Fullerton, was of the opinion that all trailer sale lots on South Harbor Boulevard (outside the City of Anaheim) have mobile sales offices. He called attention to the land- scaping shown on the rendering, and advised of the possibility that the use would he discontinued in one or two years, in the event of further development of the property° On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton, temporary permit to conduct trailer sales from mobile office was granted for No a period of two years. To this motion Councilman Chandler voted" ~CrfION CARRIED. CONDITIONA% U~.~ PERMIT NO, $23 .(.RF/;LA~$IFICATION NO, 59-60-%~), Pursuant to Condition No. 6, Resolution No. 64R-766, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 623 (service station at the southwest corner of Orange Avenue and Euclid Street), amendment to recorded deed restrictions filed as condition of Reclassification No. 59-60-14, as they pertain to parcel described in Conditional Use Permit No, 623, was submitted for City Council review and approval. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley, amendment to deed restrictions, pertaining to Reclassification No. 59-60-14, was approved, and the Mayor and City Clerk were authorized to sign said amendment. MOTION CARRIED. SIGN REQUEST - HERBERT"$ IbrrERIORS: Application submitted by R. H. Rhodes, requesting permission to erect a non-conforming sign at 3136 West Lincoln Avenue, for Herbert's Interiors, Inc., was continued from the meetings of November 10 and 17, 196~, for letter of consent to said sign from adjacent property owner to the west. 8237 Ci.t¥ .Ha.l~, Anaheim, Qallfornia..- COUI~IL MINUTES - Novembe~ .24., 1964.. 1,30 P.M. Communication dated November 18, 1964, from V. and Elsie Malone~ approving installation of subject sign five feet from their property ling, was submitted. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton, said sign permit was granted, as requested. MOTION CARRIED. Rr~£s$~ Councilman Dutton moved to recess to 7tO0 P:M. Councilman Peble¥ Seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (5,05 P.M.) PRESENT ABSENT~ PRESENT Mayor Chandler called the meeting to order. COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler, COUNCILMEN: Krein. CITYMANAGER, Keith A. Murdoch. ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER~ Robert Davis. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK~ Dene M~ Williams. CITY ENGINEER, James P. Maddox. PLANNING DIRECTORI Richard Reeseo ZONING COORDINATOR: Martin Kreidt. ASSOCIATE PLANNER,. Robert Mickelson. FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Chandler led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flago P~ESENTAT.!ON = CITIZENS RECREATION .ASSOCIATION.: On behalf of the Citizens ~ Recreation Association of the Anaheim Host Lions Club, check in the amount of $2,500°00, to he applied to the cost of construction of the La Palma Park Recreation Building, was presented hy ~kro Clyde Martin, and accepted with gratitude on behalf of the City of Anaheim hy Mayor Chandler. GONTINU~.~ .P.UBLIG HEARING = REG .LASS IF IG6T I ON NOo. 64=~5~36, yAR!ANC.~ NO, 166q .~.ND AREA ~EyE~OPMENI pLaN ~9o 11} Submitted by Rhea R. Sparling and Constance R. Dewey, requesting change of zone from R=2 to C=0 to allow the establishment of a two-story office building, and further requesting waiver of minimum site area and minimum required side yards~ property located on the north side of Broadway, approximately 330 feet east of Citron Street (623 West Broadway). The City Planning Commission recommended approval of subject reclassification and variance; and at the request of the authorized agent, public hearing before the City Council was continued to this date. Pursuant to request dated November 23, 1964, from Ulysses E. Bauer, Authorized Agent, public hearing was again continued to December 15, 1964, 7,00 PoMo, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded hy Councilman Dutton. MOTION CARRIED° P~BLI~ HEARI.NG - ~GLA$SIFICAT~ON NO. 6~=64-107 AND.COND!~IQNAL. USE PER~!~ NO.. 628, Submitted by Lionel H. and Lucille Brown, requesting change of zone from R-A to C~i to allow establishment of specialty type restaurant with on-sale beer! property briefly described as located on the west side of State College Boulevard, approximately 310 feet north of Center Street (125 North State College Boulevard)° The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1370, Series 1964~65, recommended approval of Reclassification No. 63-64-107, subject to the following conditions: I. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along State College Boulevard, for street lighting purposes. 2. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 155 per front foot along State College Boulevard, for tree planting purposes. 3. That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above mentioned., shall he complied with prior to the time that the Building Permit is issued or within a period of 180 days from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 8238 ~it¥ Halt,. ~D.$heim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Nqyem, bgF. 24. 1964. l~SO P.M... That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent upon the granting of Conditional Use Permit No~ 628. That the subject property shall he developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Revision 1, Exhibit No. l, provided however, that the proposed sign does not constitute part of the approval. Conditional Use Permit No. 628 was granted by the Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 1371, Series 1964-65, subject to the following conditions~ ~ 1. That sidewalks and driveways shall be installed along State College Boulevard as required hy the City Engineer and in accordance with - standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer° 2. That trash storage areas shall he provided in accordance with approved plans on file in the office of the Director of Public Works. 3. That fire hydrants shall he installed as required and determined to he necessary hy the Chief of the Fire Department. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above mentioned, shall he complied with prior to final building inspection. 5. That this Conditional Use Permit is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No= 63-64-107. 6, That subject property shall he developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos° 1, 2, and 3, provided, however, that the proposed sign does not constitute part of this approval. Mr. Robert Mickelson noted the location of subject property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, briefing the evidence submitted to and considered hy the City Planning Commission. He advised that the reclassification originally requested a real estate office in an existing structure; however while the matter was before the City Planning Commission, there was a change in plans and at the request of the applicants, public hearing on the reclassification was continued by the City Planning Commission to allow for the filing of a conditional use application to establish an Italian restaurant with "on-sale" beer. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition to the requested user there being no response~ asked if the applicants or their agent were present. Mr. John Caran, Authorized Agent, indicated his presence for the purpose of answering any questions. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council there being no response, declared the public hearing closed on Reclassifi- cation No. 63-64-107 and Conditional Use Permit No. 628. REsOLUtION NO. 64R-.$48: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-848 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission, amending Condition No. 3 thereof to read: "3. That Conditions Nos. I and 2, above mentioned, shall be complied with within 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant". Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~mNDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (63-64-107 - C-i) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: C OUNC I IAIE N: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-848 duly pa,ssed and adopted. 8239 F' C%ty Hal.l, Anaheim, California = COUNCIL MINUTES - November 241 .19~4t I:$0 P~Mt RESOLU/ION NO, 64R-849: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-849 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 628, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDIIIONAL USE PERMIT NOo 628. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNC IIA~N: NOES: COUNC ILMHN: ABSENT: COUNC IIAiEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-849 duly passed and adopted, P,UBLIC H~AR. ING - RECLASSIFIQATION NO.~, 64-65-33.: Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission to consider a change of zone from R-1 to C-l; property located at the southwest corner of La Palma Avenue and Moraga Street (1019- 1025 North Moraga Street)~ The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1376, Series 1964~65, recommended approval of Reclassification No. 64-65-33, unconditionally° Mr. Mickelson noted the location of subject property, advising} that the reclassification was initiated in order that the zoning might conform with existing commercial use of the property. He reported that ~ a representative of the owner of subject property appeared before the Planning Commission to request inclusion of the vacant parcel adjacent to the south (Lot 31, Tract No. 1202), which was under the same ownership and was used for off~:.street parking to serve the neighborhood commercial facilities on Lot 32° The proposed reclassification was continued and re-advertised with amended legal description in¢ludlng Lot 31. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition to the proposed reclassification, there being no response, declared the public hearing closed. ~ESOLUTION NOo 64R-850: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 64R-850 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone to C-1 unconditionally. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (64=65=33 = C~i) (Lots 31-32, Tract No. 1161) Roi1 call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNC ILNIEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-850 duly passed and adopted. P.UBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO, 64-65-$5 AND..VARIANC~ NQ~ 1659: SubmitZted by Tom H~ Weeda, requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3 and permission to waive one-story height limit within 150 feet of R-A zoned property and waive minimum required side yard; property briefly described as located on the south side of Orange Avenue, approximately 330 feet west of Western Avenue (3220 West Orange Avenue). 8240 City Hall. Anaheim. C.~[ifqrn%a ~ ~QUNGIL.MINLrrEs - November 24. 1964, The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1380, Series 1964-65, recommended reclassification, subject to the following conditionst 1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 57 feet in width, from the center line of the street~ along Orange Avenue, for street widening purposes. 2. That street improvement plans shall he prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Orange Avenue, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall he completed as required hy the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the City £ngineer~ or that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall he posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2,00 per front foot along Orange Avenue, for street lighting purposes. 4. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 15¢ per front foot along Orange Avenue, for tree.planting purposes. 5. That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent upon the granting of Variance No. 1659. 6, That Condition Nos° 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall he complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 7. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4o The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1381, Series 1964=65, granted Variance No. 1659, subject to the following conditions: 1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, provided however, that the rear portion of subject property adjacent to the Flood Control Channel shall he graded and landscaped as stipulated hy the petitioner. That this Variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassica- tion No. 64=65-35° 3. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspection. 4. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dwelling unit, to be used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. Nlr. Mickelson noted the location of subject property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, briefing the evidence submitted to and considered h¥ the City Planning Commission° He advised that .the Planning Commission encouraged the applicant to contact adjacent property owners in an effort to assemble parcels in the area to provide a total parcel which could he more easily developed, however the applicant was unable to do so. In answer to Council questioning, Ntt. Kreidt reported that Condition No. 1, of Variance No. 1659 regarding landscaping'was impOsed because the rear portion of the property was filled land and no construction would take place on this portion; it will be used for a recreational area. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the City Council for or against /he proposed reclassification and variance, there being no response, declared the public hearing closed. RESOLI~T.ION ~0~. ~4Rr8~%: Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-851 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. 8241 City Hall. Anaheim, C~ifoT0ia - COUN~..IL MInUTeS -. Nov.e~be~ 24,..1964,. 1130 P,M, Refer to Resolution Book. ~. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~Id~NDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65~35 - R-3) Roll call votez AYESz COUNCIL~ENz Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler NOES z COUNCIIA~EN: None ABSENT ~ COUNCILMEN~ Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-851 duly passed and adopted, RESOLUTION NO. 64R=852~ Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-852 for adoption, granting Variance 1659 subject to City Planning Commission recommendations, Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1659. Roll call vote~ AYES~ COUNCILMEN ~ NOES, C OUNC I LN~N z ABSENT ~ COUNCILMEN ~ Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No, 64R-852 duly passed and adopted. .R~..CLASSIFICATION ~NOo .~=~5=37. AND .VARIA~E NOo ~2~ Submitted by E. Van Casteren, requesting change of zone from R-A to R-3 to permit two-story apartment building with carports within 150 feet of R-1 and R~A zoned property; subject property briefly described as located on the south side of Ball Road~ approximately 572 feet east of Magnolia Street (2108 West Ball Road). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1382, Series 1964-65~ recommended reclassification subject to the following conditionst 1. That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 53 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Ball Road, for street widenin9 purposes, 2o That street improvement plans shall he prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim along Ball Road, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall he completed as required hy the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications dn file in the office of the City Engineer; or that a bond in the amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall he posted with the City to guarantee the installation of said engineering requirements. 3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Ball Road, for street lighting purposes. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of 1§¢ per front foot along Ball Road for tree planting purposes. 5. That the completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent upon the granting of Variance No. 1662o 6o That a Record of Survey to record the approved division of subject property be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 7. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, above mentioned, shall be complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof~ or such further time as the City Council may grant. 8. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Revision No. 1, Exhibit Nos. 2 and 3, and Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7~ 8242 City Hail. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 24. 1964. la30 P.M. " Variance No. 1662 was granted by the City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1383, Series 1964-65, subject to the following conditions: 1. That this variance is granted subject to the completion of RecIassifi- cation No. 64-65-37. 2, That trash storage areas shall he provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Pubitc Works. That fire hydrants shaii he instalied as required and determined to be necessary h¥ the Chief of the Fire Department. 4. That the owners of subject property shaI1 pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $25.00 per dweIling unit, to he used for park and recreation purposes, said amount to he paid at the time the building permit is issued, 5. That Condition Nos. 2 and 3, above mentioned, shall he complied with prior to final building inspection. 6. That subject property shai1 be deveioped substantially in accordance With plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Revision No. 1, Exhibit Nos. 2 and 3, and Exhibit Nos. 1, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Ntt. Mickelson noted the location, of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, advising that the R-A property on the south and east of subject parcel is developed with a High Schooio Upon the advise of the City Planning Commission, the petitioner presented revised plans, maintaining the required 150 foot distance between their two-story construction and the R-1 property across the street to the north. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the CityCouncil in opposition ta the proposed deveiopment, there being no response, asked if the appiicant or his agent was present and had additional evidence to present. Mr. Lee Orr, of Eredricks Deveiopment Co., Authorized Agents, stated he saw no objection to the conditions recommended by.the City Planning Commission. He advised that when revised plans were prepared, they showed the two-story buildings set back from Ball Road a sufficient distance to accompiish the 150 foot requirement from the R-i property, thereby maintain- ing the original elevation plans. Mayor Chandler declared the public hearing closed on Reclassification NOo 64-6§-37 and Variance No. 1662. ~QL~:[~T~ON NO. 64R-853s Counciiman PebIey offered Resolution No. 64R-853 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance .changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commiesiono Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE ANIENDF~ AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED° (64-65-37 - R-3) Roll call vote~ AYESs COUNC IIJ~ENI NOES = C OUNC I I~N ~ ABSENT: COUNC IIJ~N: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-853 duly passed and adopted. RESOIJ~ION NO° 64R-854~ Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 64R-854 for adoption, granting Variance No. 1662 subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission~ and waiver of height limitations only as it relates to the R-A zoned property; denying waiver of height Itmitation within I50-feet as related to R-1 zoned property. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANC~ NO. 1662. 8243 ~it¥ .H.a~l, Anaheim, California -.COUNCIL MINUTES - November 24, 1964, 1,.30 Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNC ILA~EN: ABSENT: COUNCILV~N: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-854 duly passed and adopted. pUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION,NO, 64-65-40 AND VARIANQE NO, 1663, Submitted by Richard M. Polentz, requesting a change of zone from R-O to R-i~ and permission to create an R-1 lot with waiver of minimum required lot width and minimum required lot area; property briefly described as located at the southeast corner of Harbor Boulevard and North Street (423 Park Way). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1373, Series 1964-65, recommended said Reclassification he deniedt and pursuant to Resolution No. 1374, Series 1964-65, denied Variance No. 1663. ~ir. Mickelson noted the location of subject property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, briefing the evidence submitted to and considered hy the City Planning Commission. He reported that former applications for C-1 zoning and for medical-dental office on subject property were denied hy the City Council (Reclassifications Nos.. 58-59-82 and 60-61-50, and Variance No. 1325). ~ Under subject applications, Mr. Mickelson advised that the petitioner proposes to split the R-O lots, retaining a 10,000 square foot R-O lot facing Park Way, and creating a slightly substandard R-1 lot facing North Street. However if the lot were split in accordance with Title 17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, the owners would have to make dedication along Harbor Boulevard for street widening, which would result in substandard lot sizes on both portions of the split parcel.. Mayor Chandler asked if the applicant or his agent was present, there being no response, asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition to subject applications. Mr. Bill Boettcher, 415 Park Way, stated that he represented several property owners in the area, who were present at the meeting this evening. They were of the opinion that the parcel in question was too small to divide in the manner proposed, and specially in view of the fa6t that North Street and Harbor Boulevard are heavily traveled thoroughfares. Mr. Remillard, 732 North Helena Street, addressed the Council'in opposition to the proposed lot division, being of the opinion that un- distrable precedent would be set. Mro Bill Railsback, 400 Park Way, concurred with statements of Mr. Boettcher and Mr. Remillard~ and called attention to the fact that the owner of subject property no longer resides in the City of Anaheim. The Mayor stated that sufficient evidence from those present had been received, and thereupon declared the hearing closed on Reclassification No. 64-65-40 and Variance No. 1663. RESOLUTION NO. 64~-8~5: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No, 64R-855 for adoption, denying Reclassification No. 64-65-40 in accordance with the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLU/ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED° (64-65-40.) (R-l) Roll call vote: 8244 Gi%y Hall, AD~heim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 24. 1964, lz30 P.N. AYES: COUNC ILM~N: NOES: COUNCILM~N: ABSENT ~ COUNCIL~HN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-855 duly passed and adopted. p~RSQLUTION NO. 64R-856: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 64R-856 for'a~option, sustaining action of the City Planning Commission, denying Variance No. 1663. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF TPE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 1663. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILN[EN: NOES: COUNCILM~N~ ABSENT: COUN3I~N: Pebley, Dutton, Schutt~ and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-856 duly passed and adopted. pUBLI~ H~A~tNG - RECLA.$$IFICATION NO. 64-65-48, Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission to consider change of zone from R-A to M-1 and P-L, property located on the east side of Brookhurst Street, between Crescent Avenue and the Santa Ana Freeway. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1385, Series 1964-65, recommended approval of said reclassification, unconditionally. Mir. Mickelson noted the location of subject property, the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, and summarized the evidence submitted to and considered hy the City Planning Commission. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition, there being no response, declared the public hearing closed on Reclassification No. 64-65-43° R~SQL~TION NOv 64R-857s Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-857 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended. Refer to Resolution BookQ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE A~ENDF. D AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-43 - M-I and P-L) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCIL~N: NOES: COUNCILM~N: ABSENT: COUNCILI~EN: Pehley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-857 duly passed and adopted. P.~..LIC HEA~ING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. $4-65-51s Initiated by the Anaheim Planning Commission to consider change of zone from R-A to R-2; property located on the east side of Velars Street, approximately 246 feet south of Orange Avenue (622 South Velars Street). The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1386, Series 1964-65, recommended said reclassification unconditionally. 8245 C~.ty Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 241 1~64~ 1:30 ~r. Mickelson noted the location of subject property and advised that the existing residential units on the property were allowed under Conditional Use Permit No. 87. Mayor Chandler asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition to the application, there being no response, decIared the public hearing closed on Reclassification No. 64-65-51. RESOLUTION NOo 64Rr8~8: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 64R-858 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended, unconditionally. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHA}~EDo (64-65-51 - R-2) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNC IIAtEN: NOES: COUNC ILJ~EN: ABSENT: COUNC IL~EN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-858 duly passed and adop?d. PUBLIC ~EARING - REC .LASS.IFICATION NO~ ~4-~-~ AND. G~N~RAL PLAN AMeNDMeNT NO,. 44,~ Submitted by Bank of America, N. T. and S. A., requesting a ~hange of zohe from R-A to C=3; property located at the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Loafs Street. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1419, Series 1964-65, recommended approval of said reclassification, subject to the following conditions~ 1o That the owners of subject property shall deed to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 32 feet in width, from the center line of the street, along Loafs Street, for street widening purposes, including a l§-foot radius corner return. 2. That street improvement plans shall he prepared and all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim alOng Lincoln Avenue and Loar~ Street such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, ~treet grading and paving, drainage facilities, or other appurtenant work shall he completed as required h¥ the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office o~ the City Engineer! or that a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim shall he posted with the City to 9uarantee ~he installation of said engineering requirements. 3. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the sum of $2.00 per front foot along Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street, for street lighting purposes° 4. That the owners of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the s~m of 155 per front foot along Lincoln Avenue and Loara Street for street tree planting purposes. 5. That trash storage areas shall he provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works, prior to final building inspection. 6. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4, above mentioned, shall he complied with within a period of 180 days from date hereof.~ or such further time as the City Council may grant. 7° That the 35-foot setback established hy a Council resolution he observed in the development of the property and, fu-rther, that plans of development he subject to the approval of the City Council prioA to the issuance of a building permit. 8. That a 6-foot strip of landscaping not less than 12 inches in height shall he provided on the Loafs Street and Lincoln Avenue frontages Of subject property; that an additional 2% landscaping not less than 3 feet in height shall be provided in the remainder of the parking area! 8246 City H.~i~, A.nahg~m, C~lifo~nia.- COUNCIL ~INUTE$.- November 24, 1~4, 1.~80 P,M. and that said landscaping shall be planted and provided with irrigation facilities prior to final building inspection. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. 1420, Series 1964-65, recommended disapproval of General Plan Amendment No. 44. Mr. Mickelson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He called attention to Exhibit A of General Plan Amendment No. 44, posted on the west wall of the Council Chamber, and noted findings of the City Planning Commission in recommending disapproval at this time, to he further considered in annual review. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in opposition to the proposed reclassification, there being no response, asked if anyone representing the applicant was present. Charles B. Frank indicated his presence in the audience. Mayor Chandler declared the public hearing closed on Reclassification No. 64-65~53 and General Plan Amedment Noo 44. RESOL~ION NO~ 64R-859: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 64R-859 for adoption, authorizing preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as requested, subject to the recommendations of the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (64-65-53 - C-3) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNClLNtEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-859 duly passed and adopted. RESOL~TIO~ NO~ $4R-860: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No, 64R-860 for adoption, disapproving General Plan Amendment No. 44, Exhibit A, Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DISAPPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 44. (64-65-53) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNC IIA~N: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-860 duly passed and adopted. PLAN~..D RESIDENTIAL DE'.VELOP.MENT POLICY$ Pursuant to action by the City Council on October 6, 1964, action on resolution incorporating the principles set forth in the proposed PRD, Planned Residential Development Zone, containing standards to he considered in approving conditional use permits for planned residential developments, was deferred from the meeting of October 20, 1964, for further study. The City Attorney briefed.concepts set forth in resolution proposed for adoption, and Council discussion ~as held. 824 ? City Haj~, Anaheim, Ga~i.forgia -.C.O.UNQ. IL MINUTES .-. Nqye~ 24, 19~4, 1~30 p.M. In answer to Councilman Dutton's question~ Planning Coordinator Allan Shoff clarified Section (7)(h) of Exhibit "A" pertaining to Development Red, Jew, wherein each prospective applicant is encouraged to prepare a sketch plan and to confer with the Development Review Committee prior to submission of a conditional use permit application. He reported that this provision was included because developers have requested some means of discussing and clarifying the requirements and policies of the City of Anaheim, especially since each city may differ in its PRD standards. ~tr. Geisler pointed out that the provision referred to is not mandatory, but included in policy as a suggestion only. RESOLUTION NO. 64R-861~ At the conclusion of the discussion, COuncilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-861 for adoption, Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLU/ION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ESTABLISHING CERTAIN STANDARDS TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE APPROVAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE P£RMIT FOR A PLANNED RESID£NTIAL DEVELOPMENT. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILN~N~ Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler NOES~ COUNC ILA~EN: None ABSENT: COUN~I I3~N~ Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No, 64R~861 duly passed and adopted. 1 C. ITY OF ORANGE CASE 64~WE-236=NR~ ORANGE INTER CITY AIRWAYS HELIPORT~ Request before the City of Orange, submitted by Inter City Airways~ Inc., for permission to establish a 60~foot square heliport on property owned by the Orange Drive-In Theatre, was reviewed by the City Council (property briefly described as located approximately 75 feet east of the centerline of State College Boulevard and 600 feet north of Santa Aha Freeway in Orange, California)° It was noted hy the City Council that the proposed flight pattern would follow State College Boulevard, which woUld take helicopters near the Anaheim Stadium. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Council entered no objection to the taxi-type heliport, however requested that flight patterns maintain a reasonable distance from the area of the center of activity at the Anaheim Stadium site. MOTION CARRIED. ORANGE QOUNTY TENTATIVE TRACT NO. ~01~ Tract located at the southeast corner of Blue Gum and Coronado Streets, containing 7.6 acres, and is proposed for subdivision into 14 M-i, Light Industrial District lots. Tract map was reviewed by the City Council, and Mr, Mickelson advised that the City Planning Commission recommended 24.foot standard alleys he incorporated into said tract for secondary access and for trash truck circulation. At the conclusion of Council discussion, it was moved by Councilman Schutte, seconded hy Councilman Dutton, that the City Council recommend ~o the Orange County Planning Commission that Tentative Tract No. §019 he : approved as presented. MOTION CARRIED. ~; ORANGE COUNTY CASE NO. 851~ Proposing reclassification of certain property from the E-1 "Estates" District to the E-~-12,000 "Small Estates~" District; property located on the south side of the Santa Aha Canyon Road, west of Crescent Drive in the Santa Aha Canyon area. (Councilman Pehley left the meeting, 8~28 P.M.) The City Planning Commission recommended retention of the one acre minimum on subject property, based on the following findtngs~ 8248 Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES- No.~ember 24.1964, .1~30 1, The City of Anaheim verbally committed themselves to maintaining the one-acre zoning restriction in the Peralta Hills area prior to the election on the Yorha Linda annexation. 2:. That a R-E, Residential Estates, Zone was prepared by the Planning Commission and Staff, under the direction of the City Council, to apply to the Peralta Hills area at such time as it is annexed to the City. 3. That modified street standards are Being prepared for adoption and application to the Peralta Hills area for the purpose of maintaining the suburban estates character of the area. Mr. Mickelson called attention to map of the Peralta Hills area, posted on the east wall of the Council Chamber, with those parcels under consideration colored in green. He advised that although the matter was not a public hearing before the City Planning Commission, two persons appeared before the Commission, one in favor and one in opposition to the proposed reclassification. (Councilman Pebley returned to the meeting, 8,31 P.M.) Discussion was held by the City Council and City Manager, and at the conclusion thereof, Councilman Dutton moved that the City Clerk be instructed to advise the Orange County Planning Commission that the City Council favors retention of the one-acre lot sizes, if this is the desire of the majority of the people in the Peralta Hills area. Councilm~n Schutte seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE ~.....O, 2071: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2071 for final reading. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ANtENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.24, SECTION 14.24.080 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNIGIPAL CODE, RELATING TO PARADES ON STREETS. (Required permit - Regulation - Definition) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2071 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said Ordinance he waived, Councilman Pehley seconded the motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED° Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCIIA~EN: ABSENT: COUNCILN~N: pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein Mayor Chandler declared Ordinance No. 2071 duly passed and adopted. RE$OLUTION.~O, ~4R-828: On report hy the City Clerk, Councilman Dutton offered ResolUtion No. 64R-828 for re-introduction and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO APPROVE AN A~ND~NT TO CONIRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE STATE EMPLOYEES~ RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-828 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2067: first reading.. Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 2067 for amended (Change in title only) 8249 City Hall. Anaheim. California ~ COUNCIL MINUTES - November .24 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAH£IM AND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM. After hearing read in full the tltle of Ordinance No. 2067 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said Ordinance he waived. Councilman Pehley seconded the motion° MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. .O~DINAN~E N©. 2074; Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No, 2074 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (56-57-39 - C-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No, 2074 and having knowledge of the contents therein~ Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said Ordinance he waived. Councilman Pehley seconded the motion, MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ORDINANG~ .NO, 207~I Councilman Dutton offered Ordinance No. 2075 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING~ (63-64-99 - R-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2075 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading'in full of said Ordinance he waived. Councilman Pehley seconde~i the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. O~.~INAN~E NO~ 2476: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2076 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE i8 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-69(15) - M-l) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 2076 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Dutton moved the reading in full of said Ordinance he waived. Councilman Pehley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. RI~$OLUTION NO. 64R-862z Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 64R-862 for adoption, declaring final results of special Charter EleCtion held Jdne 2, 1964. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD IN CONSOLIDATION WITH THE STATE-WIDE DIRECT PRIMARY ELECTION ON JUNE 2, 1964., WITH REFERENCE TO THE RATIFICATION AND ADOPTION OF A CITY CHARTER. 69th Assembly District i3,673 3~973 70th " " 1~564 395 71st " " 7,993 2,915 Total 23,230 7~283 Roll call vote: AYES: C OUNC I L~N: NOES: COUNC ILM£N: ABSENT: COUNC IL~EN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-862 duly passed and adopted. 8250 Qit¥ Hall. Anaheim. California - GO.UNO. IL MINU!E~ - November 24, ~9.$4~ lsJO P.M. RESOLUTION ~0~ .~4R'868' CounCilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-863 for adoption, amending Resolution No. 64R-795. Refer to Resolution Book. A'RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION No, 64R-795 PERTAINING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PARKING METERS. (2-hour limit - Olive Street) Roll call vote, AYES, COUNCILM~N: NOES: C OUNC I LM~N: ABSENT: COUNCIL~HN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-863 duly passed and adopted. %.ENIAI.;VE TRACT. NO, ~$89 v REVISION NO, 2 (REGLA~$IFICATION NO. 64-65-28 AND ~ONDI~IONAL, USE PERMIT NO~ ~24), On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pehley, Condition No. 2 of Tentative Tract No. 5389, Revision No. 2, approved h¥ the City Council November 4, 1964, was amended to read as follows: "2. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 5389 is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification No. 62-63-112 and Reclassification No. 64-65-28, and approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 624." MOTION CARRIED. ALC.gHOLIC. B~t~R~C~ LIC~NSE APPLICATIONS, The following Alcoholic Beverage License applications were presented h¥ the City Manager to the City Council for their information, Application submitted by Letty D. and Ned V. Wideburg, for New Off-Sale Beer and Wine license for Italian delicatessen, 622 West La Palma Avenue (C-1 Zone)° b. Application submitted by Roland J. Jensen for Person to Person Transfer of Off-Sale Beer and Wine license at Larry Brown"s Market, 910 South Euclid Avenue (C-1 Zone). Ce Application submitted by Michael's Markets~ Inc., for New Off-Sale General license at 2230 East Lincoln Avenue (C-1 Zone - Conditional Use Permit No. 538). de Application submitted by Lawrence William Allen, Affidavit In Support of application for New On-Sale General license at E1Fortin Bandito, Inc., 700 East Katella Avenue (C-1 Zone - Conditional Use Permit No. 585). No Council action was taken on the foregoing applications. ALCOHQLIC..BSVER~GE LICENSE APPLICATIQN - 9~,~B SOUTH NLAGNOLIA AyENUE, Application submitted by James Monroe and Carmella Ann Letgh, for New On-Sale Beer license at 918-B South Magnolia Avenue (C-1 Zone - Conditional Use Permit No. 651 applfcatton filed), was presented by the City Manager to the Ctty Council for their information. On motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Attorney was directed to file conditional protest to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against said application, on the basis of the existing C-1 zone on the property does not allow the sale of alcoholic beverages to he consumed on the premises. MOTION CARRIED° %LCOHOLIC ~¥~RAC~. LIC~NS~ APPLICATION - 18~[ WEST K~TELLA A~ENUE~ Application submitted by John and Agnes Sandor Mearns, for New Off-Sale General license at 1861 West Katella Avenue (Vacant lot - R-A Zone, C-1 zoning pending), was presented by the City Manager to the City Council for their inf6rmation. 8251 Qity ~all, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 24, 1~64, 1130 P.M. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the City Attorney was authorized to file conditional protest with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against said application, on the basis of incorrect zoning. 'MOTION CARRIED. ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION -2181 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARDI Application submitted by Robert Graham and Jean Marie Halliwell, for New Off-Sale General license at 2181 South Harbor Boulevard (R-A zone), was presented hy the City Manager to the City Council for their information, On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the City Attorney was authorized to file protest with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against said application, on the basis of incorrect zoning. MOTION CARRIED° ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLIC~T!ON.- 2150 WEST BALL ROAD: Application submitted by Samuel Humphrey for New On-Sale General license at 2150 West Ball Road (Bonafide Public Eating'Place - R-A zone), was submitted by the City Manager to the City Council for their information. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the City Attorney was authorized to file protest with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against said application, on the basis of incorrect zoning. MOTION CARRIEDo ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION - 640 WEST KATELLA AVENUEs Applicatio.n submitted hy Richard Emory and Margaret Adelaine Dully, and Willard Ralph Pool, for New Off-Sale General license at Dully Motor Hotels, Inc,, 640 West Katella Avenue, Building No. 4 (R-A zone~ Variance No. 1278, and Conditional Use Permit No. 359), was submitted hy the City Manager to the City Council for their information. On motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Attorney was directed to file protest against said application with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, on the basis of incorrect zoning~ unless further research reveals the proposed sale of al~oh61ic beverages was authorized by proper zoning application° MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NOo $4R-864, On report and recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 64R-86~ for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book, A RESOLUTION OF THE CItY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN SHELL OIL COMPANY AND THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT, THE ORANGE COUNTY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, THE COASTAL MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, THE CITY OF SANTA ANA AND THE CITY OF ANAHEIM WITH REFERENCE TO THE GRANT OF AN EASE~NT FOR A WATER PIPELINE° (East Orange County Feeder No. 2) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCIIAIEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN~ ABSENT: COUNCII2~N~ Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-864 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO~ 64R-865: On report and recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 64R-865 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT EMPLOYING CONVERSE FOUNDAIION ENGINEERS TO PROVIDE SOIL ENGINEERING SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS AND WATER TRANSMISSION LINES. (Walnut Canyon Re servo ir ) 8252 ~i%,3 ~,al%,,Anaheim, Galifom, ta - CouNcIL MINUTES - Noyember 24, 1964, Roll call vote, AYES~ COUNCIINEN~ NOES, COUNCIINEN, ABSENT, COUNCIINEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None }(rein The Mayor declared Resolution No. 64R-865 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOv .64R-865~ Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 64R-866 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TH~ CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREE~NT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE ORANGE COUNTY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT IO CONSTRUCT A SERVICE CONNECTION ON THE SANTIAGO LATERAL° (Walnut Canyon Reservoir) Roll call vote, AYES: COUNC II31EN: NOES, COUNC IIAiEN, ABSENT: COUNC II3AEN: Peble¥, Dutton, Schutte and Chandler None' Krein The Mayor declared Resolution No, 64R-866 duly passed and adopted. QO~ES.$IQN.pROP.OSAL$ - ANAHEIM $TADIUM~ Discussion was held regarding concession proposals for Anaheim Stadium, and in the best interest of the City of Anaheim, it was felt that representatives of ABC Stadium Concessions, Inc., should he orally interviewed prior to making a final determination, inasmuch as their proposal offered an attractive return to the City of Anaheim. At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Dutton moved that the Stadium Commission he requested to meet with representatives of ABC Stadium Concessions, Inco, prior to Monday, November 30, 1964, to explore and clarify proposal submitted, and further, if the Commission was unable to schedule such a meeting, that the City Council meet with said representatives of ABC Stadium Concessions, Inco, on Friday, November 27, 1964, at 11,00 A.M. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. F.ASHION SH(~ DP~FINITIONz Discussion was held pertaining to fashion shows which have been conducted in some local restaurants, and the City Ceuncil referred the matter to the City Attorney and Chief of Police to draft a clear definition of fashion shows as they pertain to entertainment permits.. .AD, JOU~MENT~ Councilman Dutton moved to adjourn. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIEDo ADJOURI~D, I0~20 City Clerk