Resolution-ZA 1988-28. • •
DECISION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR-ZA 88-28
PETITION NO.: VARIANCE N0. 3778 CEQA STATUS: NEGATIVE DECLARATION
DATES OF PUBLIC HEARING: May 5, 1988, continued to the meeting of May 19, 1988.
OPPOSITION: One person indicated her presence at the public hearing, and two
letters and a petition with 17 signatures were received.
OWNER: PRADO WOODS CORP., ATTN: .TED LLOYD, 1156 N. Tustin Avenue, Orange,
CA 92675.
LOCATION: 24 acres located northeast of the northeast corner of Avenida de
Santiago and Hidden Canyon Road; also described as Lot Nos. 6, 7,
8, 11, 12, 13, and 14 of Tract No. 8520.
REQUEST: Petitioner requests-waiver of the following under authority of Code
Section 18.12.060.040 to construct 7 single-family residences:
SECTION 18.84.042.011 - Maximum Structural Height.
(25 feet permitted in the Scenic Corridor
Zone Overlay; 26. 26.5, 28.5, 30.5 and
31 feet proposed)
Having been appointed Zoning Administrator by the Planning Director, pursuant
to Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.12.040, to decide the above-referenced
petition and a public hearing having been duly noticed for and held on the
date set forth above, I do hereby find:
1. That the request is minimal because the grades of subject lots are 65 to
161 feet above existing nearby dwellings to the west and north, that
there will be no development across the street on the south side of
Avenida de Santiago, that the grade differences between adjacent lots in
subject tract range from 4 to 65 feet and that the highest roof ridgeline
is 29 feet high with the highest chimney being at 31 feet 10 inches;
2. That there are special circumstances applicable to the property such as
size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to
other identically zoned properties in the vicinity; and
3. That strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of
privileges enjoyed by other properties in identical zoning classification
in the vicinity.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That ,the Zoning .Administrator
has reviewed the proposal to construct 7 single-family. residences on an
irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of„approximately 24 acres located
northeast of the northeast corner of Avenida de Santiago and Hidden Canyon
Road, having approximate frontages of 924`feet on the east side of Hidden
Canyon Road and. 1900 feet on the northwest side of Avenida de Santiago and
further described as Lot Nos. 6: 7, 8, 11, 12,:13 and,14 of Tract No. 8520;
and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that she has
Revision Condition No. 5, page two, 6/1/88.
..
~--~ ~--
Page 2
Variance No. 3778
considered the Negative Declaration together with any comments received during
the public review process and further ,finding on the basis of .the initial
study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will .have a significant effect on the environment.
Based on the evidence and testimony presented to me, I do hereby determine to
..approve Variance No. 3778, subject to the following conditions:
1. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate major
thoroughfare and bridge fee shall be .paid to the City of Anaheim in an
amount as specified in the Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program for
the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor, as approved by City Council
Resolution No. 85R-423.
2. That prior to issuance of a building permit, appropriate park and
recreation in-lieu .fees shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an amount
as determined by the City Council.
3. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate traffic
signal assessment fee.. shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an amount
as determined by the City Council.
4. That subject property. authorized by this resolution. shall be served by
underground utilities.
5. That fire sprinklers shall be installed as required by the City Fire
Marshall for lots ~ and 11.
6. That, as specified in Anaheim Municipal Code Section'No. 18.84.041.012,
no roof-mounted equipment, whatsoever, shall be permstted.
7. That subject property shall be developed substantially in. accordance with
.plans. and specifications'on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
Nos. 1:through ~7.
8. That prior to issuance of a building permit, or within a period of one
year from the date of this decision, whichever occurs first, Condition
Nos. 1, 2 and 3, above-mentioned, shall be complied with. Extensions for
..further time to complete said conditions, may be granted in accordance
with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
9. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos. 4, 5,
6 and 7, .above-mentioned,. shall be complied with..
10. That approval of this application-constitutes approval of the proposed
.request only to the .extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal
Zoning Code and any other applicable City regulations. Approval does not
include any .action or findings as to compliance or approval of the
request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
2 ZA 88-28
Revision Condition. No. 5, 6/1/88.
~ xl
• •
Page 2
Variance No. 3778
considered he Negative Declaration together with any comments received during
the public view process and further finding on the basis of the initial
study and an comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will h ve a significant effect on the environment.
Based on the evi nce and testimony presented to me, I do hereby determine to
approve Variance 3778, subject to the following conditions:
1. That prior to i suance of a building permit, the appropriate major
thoroughfare and ridge fee shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an
amount as specifie in the Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program for
the Foothill/Easter Transportation Corridor, as approved by City Council
Resolution No. 85R-4 3.
2. That prior to issuance of a building permit, appropriate park and
recreation in-lieu fees shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an amount
as determined by the Cit Council.
3. That prior to issuance of building germit, the appropriate traffic
signal assessment fee shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an amount
as determined by the City Co ncil.
4. That subject property authorizl~d by this resolution shall be served by
underground utilities.
5. That fire sprinklers shall be ins~lled as required by the City Fire
Marshall for lots l and 7.
6. That, as specified in Anaheim Munici~l Code Section No. 18.84.041.012,
no roof-mounted equipment, whatsoever, shall be permitted.
7. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and-specifications on file with the ity of Anaheim marked Exhibit
Nos. 1 through 27.
8. That prior to issuance of a building permit, o within a period of one
year from the date of this decision, .whichever ccurs first, Condition
Nos. 1, 2 and 3, above-mentioned, shall be compli d with. Extensions for
further time to complete said conditions may be gr ted in accordance
with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code
9. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Co ition Nos. 4, 5,
6 and 7, above-mentioned, shall be complied with.
10. .That approval of this application constitutes approval of th .proposed
request only to the extent that it complies with the .Anaheim unicipal
Zoning Code and any other applicable. City regulations. Approv does not
include any action or findings as to compliance or .approval of e
request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
2 ZA 88-28
a.,
i •
Page 3
Variance No. 3778
This decision is made, signed,. and entered into .the file this twenty-sixth day
of May, 1988. a, /~f~~c
.~~~oL~^y~L2%Gl~ad
Annika M. Santalahti
Zoning Administrator
NOTICE: This decision shall become final unless an appeal to the City
Council, in writing, accompanied by an appeal fee,. is filed with the City
Clerk within 15 davs of the date of the signing of this decision or unless a
member of the City Council shall request to review this decision within said
15 days.
DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL: I do hereby declare under penalty of perjury
that on the date set forth below, I did deposit, in the United States Mail, a
copy of the decision to the applicant and did forward a copy to the City Clerk.
DATED : (/ U ~.~l~Y!'L!~ ~V.
Pamela H. Starnes, Senior Secretary
0027g
3 ZA 88-28