Resolution-ZA 1988-39~4
DECISION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR- ZA $8-39
PETITION NO.: VARIANCE N0.-3808 CEQA STATUS: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
CLASS 3
DATE OF FUBLIC HEARING: June 30, 1988
OPPOSITION: No one indicated their presence in opposition and no
correspondence was received.
OWNERS: RONALD F. CIAMPA AND CORALINN J. CIAMPA
920 Calle Venado, Anaheim, CA 92807
AGENT: FRED FABRE', 624 West Wilson, B-1, Costa Mesa, CA 92627
LOCATION: 6950 East Avenida de Santiago
REQUEST: Petitioner requests waiver. of the fallowing under authority of
Code Section 18.12.060.040:
SECTION 18.84.042.011 - Maximum Structural Height.
(25 feet permitted in Scenic Corridor
Zone Overlay;-28.5 feet proposed)
Having been appointed Zoning Administrator by the planning Director, pursuant
to Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.12.040, to decide the above-referenced
petition and a public hearing having been duly noticed for and held on the
date set forth above, Z do hereby find:
1. That. the request is minimal consisting of only a small 12' x 12' area of
the roof (less than 3~ of the entire roof) being higher than 25 feet;
and, further, that the actual height is only 3.5 feet higher than the
Code standard;
2. That there are special circumstances applicable to the property such as
size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to
other identically zoned properties in the vicinity;. and
3. That strict application of the Zoning Code deprives .the property of
privileges enjoyed by other properties in identical .zoning classification
in the vicinity.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Zoning ;Administrator
has reviewed the proposal to construct a 2-story, 28-foot, 6-inch high,
single-family .residence with waiver of, maximum structural height on an
irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 2 acres, having
a frontage of approximately 233 feet on the south side'of Avenida de Santiago
having a maximum depth of approximately 504 feet and being located
approximately 800 feet west of the centerline of Hidden Canyon Road-and
further described.. as 6950 East Avenida de Santiago; and that the Planning
Director or his authorized representative has determined that the, proposed
project falls within ,the definition of Categorical,Exemptions, Class 3, as
defined in the State EIR Guidelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt
from the requirement to prepare an EIR.
M M
Page 2
Variance No. 3808
Based on ,the evidence and testimony presented to me, I do hereby determine to
approve Variance No. 380$, subject to the following conditions:
1. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate major
thoroughfare and bridge fee shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an
amount as specified in the Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program for
the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor, as approved by City Council
Resolution No. 85R-423.
2. 'That prior to issuance of a building permit, appropriate park and
recreation in-lieu fees shall be paid ,to the City of Anaheim in an amount
'as determined by the City Council.
3. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate traffic
signal .assessment fee shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an amount
as determined by City 'Council resolution.
4. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
5. That, as specified in Anaheim Municipal Code Section No. 18.84.042.012
no roof-mounted equipment, whatsoever, shall be permitted.
6. That subject property shall, be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications on fi a with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
Nos, 1 through 8.
7. That prior to issuance of a building permit, or within a period of one
year from the_date of this decision, whichever. occurs first, Condition
Nas. 1, 2, and 3, above-mentioned, shall be complied with. Extensions
for further time to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance
with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
8. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos. 4, 5,
and 6, above-mentioned, shall. be complied with.
9. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed
request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal
Zoning Code and any other applicable City regulations. Approval does not
include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the
request .regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
This decision is made, signed, and entered into the file. this seventh day of
July,. 1988.
A nika M. Santalahti
Zoning Administrator
2 ZA 88-39
.f
Page 3
Variance No. 3808
M
NOTICE: This decision shall become final unless an appeal to the City
Council, in writing, accompanied by an appeal-fee, is filed with the City
Clerk within 15 days of the date of the signing of this decision or unless
members of the City Council shall request to review this decision within said
15 days.
DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL: I do hereby declare under penalty of perjury
that on the date set forth below, I did deposit, in the United States Mail, a
copy of the decision to the applicant and did forward a copy to the City Clerk.
DATED t July 7 , 19 8 $ ~3+~ s~~//'t.~/.1/ .
Pamela H. Starnes, Senior Secretary
0064q
3 ZA 88-39