Loading...
Resolution-ZA 1988-57=-. "~ DECISION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR - ZA 88-57 PETITION: VARIANCE N0. 3839 CEQA STATUS: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION CLASS 3 DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: October 6, 1988, continued from the public hearing of September 8, 1988. OPPOSITIONe 3 people attended the public hearing and spoke in opposition; and 4 letters in opposition were received. OWNERS: CHARLES E. SUGGETT AND PRISCILLA L. SUGGETT 6017 East Queens Drive, Anaheim, CA 92807 LOCATION: 7571 East Martella Lane REQUEST: Petitioner requests .waiver of the following under authority of Code Section .18.12.060.040 to construct a 2-story, 35.5-foot high, single-family residence: SECTIONS. 18.23.062.010 - Maximum Structural Height. and 18.84.042.011 (30 feet permitted in the RS-HS-22,000 Zone and 25 feet permitted in the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone; 35.5 .feet proposed) Having been appointed Zoning Administrator by the Planning Director, pursuant to Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.12.040, to decide the above-referenced petition and a public hearing having .been duly noticed for and held on the date set forth above, I do hereby find: 1. That the proposal, as approved for a maximum height of 30 feet, is minimal because the front elevation height of .the proposed dwelling will range from 30 to 21 feet as seen from Martella Lane (the only abutting public access) with the average being 25.5 feet high;. and, further, that the overall impact of the approved height is minimized by the different .grade levels of the adjacent building pads and by the existing slopes of both the lot and Martella Lane:. Martella Lane abutting subject lot slopes down about 8 feet in an east-west direction and subject lot slopes down from Martella Lane approximately 9 feet from the southwest corner of the'lot (at Martella Lane) to the lowest grade at the garage (northwest corner of the dwelling) and approximately 3 feet down from the driveway entrance on Martella Lane to the lowest grade at the garage; 2. That there are special circumstances applicable to the .property such as size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other identically zoned properties in the vicinity; and 3. That -strict application of the .Zoning Code deprives the property _of privileges enjoyed by other properties in identical zoning classification in the vicinity. ZA 88-57 • Page 2 Variance No. 3839 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Zoning Administrator has .reviewed the proposal for waiver of maximum structural height to construct a 2-story, 35.5-foot high, single-family. residence on an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 0.5 acre, having a frontage of approximately I00 feet on the northeast side of Martella Lane, having a maximum depth of approximately 250 feet, being located approximately 870 feet north of the centerline of Mohler Drive and further described as 7571 East Martella Lane; and-that the Planning Director or his authorized representative has determined that. the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical Exemptions „ Class 3, as defined in the State EIR Guidelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR. Based on the evidence and testimony presented to me, I do hereby determine to approve Variance No. 3839, in part for a maximum building height of 30 feet, subject. to the following conditions: 1. That unless proof of exemption is submitted in compliance with City Council Resolution No. 85R-423, prior to issuance of a building permit, the .appropriate major thoroughfare and bridge fee shall be paid to the .City of Anaheim in an amount as specified in the Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program for the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor, as approved by City .Council .Resolution No. 85R-423. 2. That _prior to .issuance of a building permit, appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees shall be paid to-the City of Anaheim in an amount as determined by the City Council. 3. That prior to issuance of a building permit, the appropriate traffic .signal assessment fee shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an amount as determined by City Council resolution. 4. That Martella Lane shall be developed in accordance with the Engineering Department's Standard Detail No. 118 for private streets within the Mohler Drive Area. 5. That prior to issuance of a building permit, that the appropriate drainage assessment and sewer assessment fees shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in an amount as determined by the City Engineer. 6. That the new construction authorized by this resolution shall be served by underground utilities. 7. That any .specimen tree removal shall be subject to the tree preservation regulations in Chapter 18.84 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, the "SC" Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone. 8. That, as specified in Anaheim Municipal Code Section No. 18..84.042.012, ,no .roof-mounted .equipment, whatsoever, or ground-mounted radio or television antennas shall be permitted. O110g 2 ZA 88-57 . • ~ Page 3 Variance No. 3839 9. That no driveway grades shall exceed ten percent (10~) except by prior approval of the City Fire Department and the Engineering Department. 10. That a parking plan indicating compliance with City parking design standards for garages shall be submitted to and approved by the City Traffic Engineer. 11. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 4; provided, however, that the maximum building height shall not exceed thirty (30) feet. 12. That prior to issuance of a building permit, or within a period of one year from the date of this decision, whichever occurs first, Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 and 10, above-mentioned, shall be complied with. Extensions for further time to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. 13. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos. 4, 6, 9 and 11 above-mentioned, shall be complied with. 14. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. This decision is made, signed, and entered into the file this thirteenth day of October, 1988.. Annika M. Santalahti Zoning Administrator NOTICE: This decision shall become final unless an appeal to the .City Council, in writing, accompanied by an appeal fee, is filed with the City Clerk within 15 .days of the date of the signing of this decision or unless members of the City Council shall request to review .this decision within said 15 days. DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL: I do hereby declare under penalty of perjury that on the date set forth below, I did deposit, in the United States Mail, a copy of the decision to the applicant and did forward a copy to the City Clerk. DATED: ~.j, `~ ~Q ~`~.' Pamela H. Starnes, Executive Secretary 0110g 3 ZA 88-57