Resolution-ZA 1991-03f ~'
•
.DECISION NO. ZA 91-3
A DECISION OF THE ZONIN(; ADMINISTRATOR
APPROVINQ~ VARIANCE NO. 4100
PETITIONz VARIANCE NO. 4100 CEOA STATUS: CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION,
CLASS 5
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING: January 24, 1991
OWNER: WOODCREST DEVELOPMENT
17712 Mitchell North, Irvine CA 92714
AGENT: Hunsaker & ASSOCIATES IRVINE
Three Hughes, Irvine CA 92718
LOCATION:' 324 North Rosebud Court
OPPOSITION: No one indicated<ther presence at the public-in opposition to the
proposal and no correspondence in opposition was received.
RE4UEST:-- Petitioner requests waiver of the following under authority of Code
Section 18.12.060.080 to permit a Lot Line'Adjustment for an
existing single-family lot:
SECTION 18.71.Q60.030(e) - Minimum lot width.
(20 feet required. for. flag lots in
Development Area 7 of the Sycamore
Canyon Specific. Plan [SP 88-1J;
15 .feet. proposed).
Having been appointed Zoning Administrator by the Planning Director, pursuant
to Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.12.040, to decide the above-referenced'
petition and a public hearing: having been duly noticed 'for and held on-the. date
set forth above, I do hereby find:
1. That any impact by, the proposal is minimal because no additional lots are
being created and the number of flag lots at the terminus of Rosebud Court
will remain the same;
2. -.That the. petitioner's. agent. indicated at the public hearing-that the
reason. for the request is to eliminate possible `view obstruction across
the driveway on the. adjacent lot o the west by..preventing construction of
a fence or planting'.of landscaping on subject property too close to the
driveway on said adjacent lot;
3. That there are special circumstances applicable to the property such as
shape, location, surroundings and driveway location,.which do not apply to
other identically zoned properties in the vicinity; and
4. That strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of
privileges enjoyed by other properties 'in identical zoning classification
in 'the vicinity.
ZA=4100 -1- ZA 91-3
~ 4 s'.
Page 2 -
Varance'No. 4100
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Zoning Administrator
has reviewed the proposal for 'waiver of minimum lot width to permit a lot line
adjustment `for an existing single family lot which consists of an
irregularly-shaped parcel of land containing approximately 0.15 acre, having a
frontage of approximately 20 feet on the-east side of Rosebud Court, having a
.maximum depth of approximately 104 feet, being located approximately 240 north
of the centerline of Canyon Vista Drive, and further described as 324 North
Rosebud Court; and that the Planning Director or ,his authorized representative
has determined that the proposed project falls within the definition of
Categorical Exemptions, Class 5, as defined in the"State EIR Guidelines and is,
therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR.
Based on the evidence and testimony presented to me, I do hereby determine to
approve Variance No 4100, subject to the following conditions:
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
.plans and specifications `submitted to `the City of Anaheim by the
petitioner and which plans are on file-with the Planning Department marked
Exhibit No. 1.
2. That within a period of one'(1) year from the date of this decision, the
petitioner shall obtain final approval of Lot Line Adjustment Plat No. 237
and record said Adjustment with the Office of the Orange County Recorder.
Extensions for further time to complete said conditions may be granted in
.accordance with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code..
3. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed
- request onlyto the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal
Zoning Code and any. other applicable City, State and Federal regulations.
Approval does not include any.. action or>findings'as to compliance or
approval'of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance,
..regulation or requirement.
This decision is made, signed, and entered into the file this thirtieth day of
January, 1991.
~c
Annika M. Santalahti
Zoning Adrrrnistrator
NOTICE: This decision shall 'become final unless an":appeal to the City'Council,
in writing, accompanied by an appeal fee, is filed with the City Clerk within
15 dava of the date-of the signing..-of this decision or_unless members of the
City Council shall request to review this decision within said 15 days.
DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY MAIL: I do hereby declare under penalty of perjury
that on the date set forth below, I did deposit, in the United States Mail, a
copy of the decision to the applicant .and did forward a copy to the :City Clerk.
DATED: January 30, 1991
Pamela H.`Starnes
Administrative Assistant
ZA-4100- -2- ZA 91-3