Loading...
1956/11/13 1758 Ci ty Hall, Anaheim, Ca.lifo~nia. November 5, 1956 - 7:00 PsM. Councilman Coons moved to adjourno Countilman Fry seconded the motiono MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED. f) SIGNED: ~ In. ~ Ci ty Clerk (1 City Hall, A~aheim, California, November 13, 1956 - 7;00 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in Regular Session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN I None. CITY ATTORNEY: Preston Turner, Present. CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: Keith A. Murdoch, Present. MINUTES: The Minutes of the regular meeting held October 23, 1956 and adjourned regular meetings held October 25th and November 5, 1956 were approved on motion by Councilman Wisser, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 3562: Councilman Coons offered Resolution No. 3562 and moved for its passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY mUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND DIRECfING THE PAYMENT OF DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF NOVEMBER 13, 1956. ($381,860.41) n On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: mUNCILMEN: OOUNCILMEN: mUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser. None. None. The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted. BID PROPOSALS - JOB NO. 127: Pursuant to Resolution No. 3536 and Legal Notice duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin, October 26, 1956 and November 2, 1956, the City Clerk was instructed to open Bid Proposals for the improvement of the second alley north of La Palma Avenue between patt and Kemp Streets, and the second alley south of Center Street between Philadelphia and Claudina Streets, Units A and B respectively, Job No. 127, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Wisser. MOTION CARRIED. BIDS RECE IVED L. J. Da vi 5 Cement Contractor 14162 Mar-Les Drive Santa Ana, California (Accompanied by a Bid Bond in the amount of 10%) $ 5,503.60 I] Parkview Builders, Inc. 2220 Southside Drive Montebello, California (Accompanied by a Bid Bond in the amount of 10%) $ 8,839.12 Whittier Concrete Co. 13835 E. Second Street Whittier, California (Accompanied by a Bid Bond in the amount of $900.00) $ 8,970.08 Sully-Miller Contracting Co. (Accompanied by a Certified P. O. Box 432 Check No. 5963 in the Orange, California amount of $600.00) $ 5,~42.50 1759 City Hall, Anaheim, California, November 13, 1956 ... 7rOOP.M. Bids were referred to the City Engineer for tabulation and report on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Fry. MOTION CARRIED. After tabulation, the City Engineer, George E. Holyoke, reported the Sully-Miller Contracting Company to be low bidder and recommended the acceptance of said bid. ,-- RESOLUTION NO. 3563: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution Noo 3563 and moved for its passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PRO- POSAL AND AWARDTNG A OONTRA~T TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT, AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF SEOJND ALLEY NORTH OF LA PALMA AVE. BETWEEN PATT AND KEMP ST. AND SECOND ALLEY SOUTH OF CENTER ST. BETWEEN PHILADELPHIA AND CLAUDINA ST., UNITS irA" AND "B" RESPECTIVELY, JOB NO. 127. . On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser. None. None. The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and. adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - VARIAN~ NO. 63l: Submi tted by Mr. ~James Sparkes requesting that property described briefly as located north of Lincoln Avenue, east of '--, Stanton Avenue be used for a dump for earth, trash and other materials other than oil well rotary mud. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 64, granted said Variance for a commercial dump for non-combustible materials. Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered by the City Council and public hearing ordered held. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council on the matter. Mr. Otto Jacobs, representing Mr. Sparkes, addressed the Council and advised that it was his opinion that, the City Planning Commission did not clearly have in mind the intended use of the property when they limited the use to non- combustible materials. He further advised, that Mr. Sparkes .intended to have a cut and fill operation and that the limitation to only non-combustible materials would limit the import of the application and requested that the City Council grant the Variance as a cut and fill operation with no burning. r- Mr. Barnes, representing Butler-Harbour Construction Company, builder of approximately 110 homes east of the proposed dump site, addressed the City Council and stated that as both Variance Nos. 631 and 639, which was requested by the County of Orange for the same use, was being considered that they objected to both and did not want any dump at all in this location, but that if one was to be granted, it was their desire that the County of Orange be allowed to utilize this property because the County later on planned to use the reclaimed property for a park site. The City Council agreed that both Variances should be heard at the same time. Mr. James Walker addressed the City Council with reference to Variance No. 639, representing Clarence Wesley Rains and his wife, Dollie P. Rains, owner of the parcel of property immediately east. Mr. Walker advised that the applica~n of the County of Orange cover the Rainsiproperty and the Sparkes property and does not cover a private dump now operated at the south of the Rains property, nor does it cover a rotary mud dump presently located on the west, and further, that the north part of the Sparkes and Rains property is being developed now for sand 1760 City Hall, Anaheim, Calif~rnia, November 13, 1956 - 7:00 P.M. excavatione He further advised, that the procedure as outlined in the City of Anaheim Ordinance was practical and was not being followed. Mr. Jacobs, with reference to Variance No" 631, raised the question of authority of the County's application, not being property owners. He further ad- vised that they were interested in securing the Variance for a cut and fill operated dump with no burning in the event that the County of Orange abandoned their con- demnation proceedings. ......... ; Mr. Derek Harris, representing the County of Orange, addressed the Council and stated that the County wanted to reclaim the land within a reasonable time and that it could be used for a park, football field, or playground, or anything that did not entail heavy construction on top of the fill. He further advised that an area like this was a hazard with subdivisions and people locating closer and closer to it and that the principal interest all around is to fill it up as quickly as possible, perhaps in the neighborhood of three years. Mayor Pearson asked if there were any similar operations that could be seen. He stated further that they did not want any obnoxious odors or it to be- come a nuisance. MrG Harris advised that there were chemicals now being used to combat the odors and that they would do everything in their power to keep it from be- coming a nuisance. Councilman Schutte asked if the County had the right to apply for the Variance. The City Council decided to take the matter under consideration to allow necessary time to investigate the cut and fill operation, and further, the matter of the legality with reference to the County of Orange application including the Rains property, and further, to establish necessary conditions regulating this enterpriseo ~ Mr. Walker stated that if the City establish conditions to the Variance, that they would have more control in granting the Variance to private ownerso Councilman Coons moved that the hpa~;n9 be cqntinued to Decpmbp~ 11, 1956 7:00 o'clock PoM. Councilman Wisser seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. VARIANCE NO. 639 - APPEAL FTT.FD: Appeal of Clarence Wesley Rains and Dollie P. Rains with reference to Variance No. 639 was filed by Attorney James Walker November 5, 1956. Mr. Walker advised that they were willing to have the appeal matter set over to the same date as the hearing was continued to. On motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Wisser, public hearing was ordered to be held on the matter December 11, 1956, 7:00 o'clock P.M. MOTION CARRIED. ., _PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 643; Submitted by Griffith Brothers, requesting per- mission to erect a service station on Lots 58 and 59 of Tract No. 1591, located at the sourthwest corner of Euclid and Crescent Avenues. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 77, denied said Vari ance 0 Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Mro John D. Griffith and public hearing orderedo The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council. .~ Councilman Coons stated he wished to disqualify himself in this hearing. Henry Bryant, 554 Fairhaven, owner of the property directly across the alley from the property where the service station would be erected, advised that the homes in this tract all have rear living rooms and even with a six foot fence you cbuld see the service stationo Further, that many of the residents in this tract are shift workers and sleep during the day and the noise from the activity of the service station would be annoying. He feit that Mr. Griffith was entitled to his property rights and would be in favor of a buffer of single family multiple units. 1761 City Hall, Anaheim. California. November 13, 1956 - 7:00 P.M. (, Mr. Griffith, one of the owners of the property, pr~sented a chart showing that Euclid Avenue was progressively becoming a business street and that practically every corner was found to be zoned or was in the process of being zoned businesso Further, that before the Broadway shopping development was con- st~ucted,they were asked ifthe~ opposed the shopping center which they didn't, however, the Veteran's Administration cancelled their commitments on allowing houses al~~g the Euclid Avenue frontage. Therefore, twelve lots were dropped fiom the-conditions and restrictions. He further advised, that the sales force, s'~lling ~his homes, told the people that they did not know what would go in on that property, but they could be certain that it would not be houses. He further stated that he did not agree that the property was logically suited for residential income and that the only inquiries he has had regarding the property was, would m be willing to sell the property for a commercial venture. He stated that the Shell Oil Company is the company that he has entered into contract with, subject to the granting of the Variance, and felt that the Variance should not be denied where it faces into a commercial area and another similar use. Ronald Holmes, 544 Fairhaven, stated that Mr. Griffith had promised that there would only be single family residence on that property. Mr. R. C. Remick, 536 Parkwood and owner of another parcel of property within the territory, advised that he would like to see it developed to its fullest and was in favor of the granting of the Variance and stated that it was his opinion that any development on this highway would help the entire area and for those interested in selling their homes, it would create a greater demand. Mrs. Lorentzen, 520 Fairhaven, advised that they were told that the empty lots on Euclid were R-l zones. Mr. Lewis W. Steeves, 553 North Fairhaven, advised that the lights from the existing station shine into his bedroom window and that he objected to the additional noise that would be created by another station; that the noise /-1 from the existing sta,tion not only troubled him but his father-in-law, who is a resident in his horn! and an invalid confined to his bed. He also called attention to the iner~ase in traffic and the additional expenditure that would be necessary to inct~ise the safety measures of this intersection. Mr. John Rathe, 530 Parkwood, addressed the Council and stated that the property was n~ longer suitable for dwellings and that the use of the area had changed and tqat he favored either business or professional use. Further, that he sat outside of the Union Station for nearly 30 minutes this evening and found the busi ne$'s to be clean and probably wi th less noi se than most other businesses. He felt that due consideration should be given to these major businesses~ Mrs. R. E. Rogers, Jr., 516 Fairhaven, felt that apartments should be constructed there and called attention to the increased traffic travelling both Fairhaven Street and the Alley. Mayor Pearson asked, would it make any difference if Mr. Griffith planned a proposed elevation of the entire area so that the people in the area could see what would go in there and what they could expect in the future as this was a problem that would come up every time a use is offered. "...... Mr. Griffith stated that the reason they had not asked for the re- zoning of the entire strip was because they did not know what other uses might be made of the property; and that the company wanted to keep the entire area for an investment.. They had in mind a medical and dental center, however, it would take time to find doctors that wanted to relocate and find out their needs so that the buildings could be constructed to their specifications, such as how much parking would be required, etc. He stated that it would be rather difficult for him to be bound by a proposed plan under the circumstances. Mr. Bill Franklin, 536 Fairhaven, addressed the Council in opposition to the granting of the Variance. Councilman Wisser moved that the hearing be closed and that the matter , be held over to the next meeting to allow further study and consideration. (November 20, 1956). Councilman Fry seconded the motion. MOTION/CARRIED. 1762 City Hall, Anaheim~ California, November 13, 1956 - 7&00 PoM. VARIANCE" NO. 612; Submitted by Fabre Construction Corp 0 (George Do Buccola), re- questing permission to develop lots within Tract NOe 2530 into single family re- sidential lotso Said tract is located at the southeast corner of Laara Street am Claredge Drive. Public hearing was held on this matter October 9, 1956, at which time the hearing was declared closed with action to be taken at a later date@ :1 The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 43, granted said Varianceo Mr. MacDaniel addressed the Council and advised that since the last meeting, Mrs Buccola, Mr$ Holyoke, and himself had discussed the tract and that Mrs Holyoke had made considerable study on the methods of compaction and that both he and Mr. Buccola agreed to conform to any reasonable rulings as established by Mr. Holyoke and go along with any reasonable methods of compaction~ including compaction testso Mro Holyoke, City Engineer, stated that sample ordinances have been obtained from several cities on the methods of compactiont and that Mro MacDaniel had assured him that they would agree to this action, and thereupon, recommended the acceptance of the tentative map, subject to engineering requirements and adequate compactiono TRACT NO. 2530: Councilman Coons moved the Tentative Map of Tract Noo 2530 be approved and that if the final map is presented before the Ordinance is adopted, that the subdivider furnish compaction reports on all filled ground, said reports to show a minimum of 90% density on all filled grounde Councilman Schutte seconded the motiono MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 3564: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution Noo 3564 and moved for its passage and adoption, granting Variance Noo 612, changing certain lots within Tract NOG 2530 from R....O to R...l, subject to engineering requirementsa I~ Reier to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE N03 6120 On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: mUNCILMEN: mUNCILMEN: mUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wissero None", Noneo The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adoptedo PUBLIC HEARING - BUTLER...HARBOUR ANNEXATION: Pursuant to Resolution No. 3486 duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin and Placentia Courier, October 4 and October 11, 1956, and written notices mailed to owners of property October 4, 1956, public hearing was ordered held on the proposed annexation of uninhabited territory known and designated as the Butler-Harbour Annexationo The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council on the mattere No one present addressed the Councilo The City Clerk reported that no written protests had been received, thereupon, the Mayor declared the hearing cl~ ed. ~ ORDINANCE NO. 1103: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance Noo 1103 for first reading and moved for its passage and adoptiono AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS THE BUTLER-HARBOUR ANNEXATION. After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance Noo 1103 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Coons moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waivedo Councilman Wisser seconded the motiono MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. .~~~;-;~ c.r' 1763 qi tv Hall, Ana.heim, California. November 1.3,.1956 - 7JO~ P.~._ SOUTHEAST ANNEXATION: Public Heari~9 was held on th~ p~opose~ annexation of un- inhabited territory known and designated as the Southeast Annexation on October 23, 1956, at which time no written protests to said proposed uninhabited annexation were filed. The hearing was continued to allow the necessary 10 days for the filing of protests. The Clerk reported no protests to said proposed annexation had been r fi led. Councilman Coons moved the hearing be closed. Councilman Wisser seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. ll04& Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1104 for first reading and moved for its passage and adoption. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED AS THE SOUTHEAST ANNEXATION. After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. ll04 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Wisser moved the reading in full of said ordinance be waived. Councilman Fry seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. KATELLA ANNEXATION: Public hearing was held October 23, 1956 on the proposed annexation of inhabited territory known and designated as the Katella Annexation, and continued to allow the necessary 10 days for the filing of supplemental protests to said annexation~ The City Clerk reported on the contents of the following filed certificate with reference to the original and supplemental protests filed on the inclusion of property within the proposed annexation; [I STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) s s CITY OF ANAHE IM ) I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that upon receipt of written protests to the inclusion of properties within the proposed KATELLA ANNEXATION, this office checked said written pro- tests to determine the sufficiency thereof, and I FURTHER CERTIFY, that according to the last equalized assessment roll of the County of Orange, State of California, the assessed valuation of privately owned property within said proposed annexation is ~...... $ 322,159.00 AND, the assessed valuation of property appearing on the Public Utility Rolls, State of California, (Southern California Edison Compa ny) i s I).... I) .. . . . . . It . . 0 I) 0 . 0 . 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4 ,400 .00 AND, the assessed valuation of property appearing on the Public Utility Rolls, State of California, (Southern California Gas Company), is ....................................................... $ 55,500.00 AND I FURTHER CERTIFY, that the total assessed valuation of all land, exclusive of improvements, within the area proposed for annexation is ....~........................................................... $ 382,059.00 AND I FURTHER CERTIFY, that the total assessed valuation of ~i property, exclusive of improvements, owned by persons within said ter- I ritory proposed to be annexed who have filed written protests on or before i I October 23, 1956, and whose ownership I have been able to veri fy, including those persons requesting their names be withdrawn from said written pro- tests, as previously reported, was .0.............................. $ 60,970.00 AND, during the period from October 24, 1956, through and in- cluding November 2, 1956, additional written protests have been filed by owners of property having an assessed valuation, exclusive of improvements totaling .~...O.......................$...e......~................. $ 4,640.00 AND I FURTHER CERTIFY, that the assessed valuation of all written protests filed to the inclusion of properties within said proposed KATELLA 1764 City Hall, Anaheim. California, November 13, 1956 = 7:00 PoM. ANNEXATION, exclusive of improvements, and according to the last equalized assess- ment roll of the County of Orange, State of California, whose ownership I have been able to verify, including those persons requesting their names be withdrawn from said written protests, is O.GGOO"OG..OO~GGO..000G..OO.9000....O.... $ 65,610.00 AND I FURTHER CERTIFY, that the total assessed valuation of properties, exclusive of improvements, owned by persons within said territory proposed to be annexed requesting their names be withdrawn from said protests and whose ownership I have been able to verify, as previously reported, is 80 $ 2,370.00 :1 AND I FURTHER CERTIFY, that the total assessed valuation of property, exclusive of improvements, which may be owned by persons within said territory proposed to be annexed who have filed written protests to said annexation, but whose ownership I have not been able to verify by reason of irregularity in signatures, or for other reasons, as previously reported, was 0080...$ 18,030.00 AND, during the period of October 24, 1956, through and including November 2, 1956, two owners satisfactorily proved ownership, thereby re- ducing the above amount GOOG.....O...O..O.......................... $ 770000 AND I FURTHER CERTIFY, that the total assessed valuation of properties exclusive of improvements, which may be owned by persons within said territory proposed for annexation who have filed written protests to said annexation but whose ownership I have not been able to verify by reason of irregularity in signatures, or for other reasons, including those persons requesting their names be withdrawn from said protests, is now ......00.......0........... $ 17,260.00 AND I FURTHER CERTIFY, that the total assessed valuation of property, exclusive of improvements, which may be owned by persons within said territory proposed to be annexed but whose ownership I have not been able to verify and who have requested their names be withdrawn from said written protest, is ... $ 9,020.00 :~ i AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the total assessed valuation of properties, exclusive of improvements, owned by persons within said territory proposed to be annexed, filed prior to and including November 2Q 1956, including property which may be owned by persons within said territory proposed for annexation who have filed written protests against said annexation, but whose ownership I have not been able to verify by reason of irregularity in signatures or for other reasons, and including those persons requesting their protests be withdrawn from said written protests, is the sum of OQOGct..0.8QOGOQ80e&.088Qe $ 82,870.00 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 13th day of November, 1956. /s/ Dene ~. Williams DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim (SEAL) Councilman Schutte moved that the City Council find that $82,870.00 valuation of the total protests is not 50% of the total assessed valuation of the territory proposed for annexation, exclusive of improvements. Councilman Coons seconded the motione MOTION CARRIED. The City Council considered the request of the owners of property re- questing exclusion of their land from the proposed annexation as filed by Melrose Abbey, Inc., William C. Stephens, agent on behalf of all protesting property owners within Tract Noo 71, and William CQ Stephens on his own property consisting of approximately 15 acres within Tract No. 71, and D. W. Tubbs, for and on behalf of Pearl Wall Lang. ~~ Councilman Coons moved that the boundaries of the proposed annexation remain as originally established by the proponents requesting annexation and that the applications for exclusion be deniedo Councilman Wisser seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 1765 City Hall, Anaheim, California, November 13, 1956 ~ 7100 P.M. . \ . . . . . , .. . RESOLUTION NO. 35651 Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 3565 and moved for its passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CALLING A SPECIAL ELECTION ON THE ~5TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1957, IN A CERTAIN TERRITORY IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE '-"1 OONTIGUOUS TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM PROPOSED TO BE ANNEXED TO SAID CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROVIDING FOR THE HOLDING OF SUCH ELE.CTION AND SUBMITTING TO THE ELECTORS 'RESIDING IN SUCH TERRITORY THE QUESTION WHETHER SUCH TERRITORY SHALL BE ANNEXED TO, IN- CORPORATED IN, AND MADE A PART OF SAID CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE PROPERTY IN SUCH TERRITORY BE, AFTER SUCH ANNEXATION, SUBJECT TO TAXATION EQUALLY WITH PROPERTY WITHIN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO PAY ITS PRO RATA PORTION, BASED UPON ASSESSED VALUATION, OF ALL THE BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OF SAID CITY OF ANAHEIM OUTSTANDING ON THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1956, OR THERETOFORE AUTHORIZED; DESCRIBING SAID TERRITORY AND DESIGNATING IT BY THE NAME OF ttKATELLA ANNEXATION", ESTABLISHING AN ELECTION PRECINCT AND POLLING PLACE IN SAID TERRITORY; APPOINTING THE OFFICERS OF ELECTION FOR SAID SPECIAL ELECTION, AND PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF SUCH ELECTION. r-- r, \ f I On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following votel AYES. NOES. ABSENT: mUNCILMEN a COUNCILMEN. OJUNCI LMENa Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser. None. None. The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted. BALL-DALE ANNEXATION. A copy of a letter presented by Mr. Bill Adams was briefed by Mayor Pearson, with referehce to the conduction of the Ball-Dale Annexation election. HASTER STREET ANNEXATION, Report of the City Planning Commission recommending the City Council consider the inhabited area for annexation known and designated as the Haster Street Annexation was submitted and read. RESOLUTION NO. 3566. Councilman Wisser offered Resolution No. 3566 and moved for its passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIlY OF ANAHEIM CONSENTING TO THE COM- MP~~M~NT_OF PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNEXATION OF INHABITED TERRITORY TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (Haster Street Annexatiol')) On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote. AYES. NOES. ABSENT. COUNCI LMEN I OOUNCILMEN. CDUNCILMEN. Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser. None. None. The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted. FINAL MAP - TRACT NO. 2450. Located on the West side of Gilbert Street running from Stonybrook north to Orange Avenue. George E. Holyoke, City Engineer, reported that all necessary fees had been paid and the required bonds filed and recommended the acceptance of said map. It was moved by Councilman Fry, seconded by Councilman Wisser,that Final Map of Tract No. 2450 be approved subject to engineering requirements. MOTION CARRIED. TRACT NO. 1812 - REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TI~I The Administrative Officer reported that the original approval of tentative map, 'Tract No. 1812, had been granted by the City Council 1n January, 1904, subject to the completion of the Ball Road Annexation No.2, and that the Ball Road Annexation No. 2 was completed 1 766 ' f City Hall, Anaheim, California, November 13, 1956 ~ 7:00 P.M. in March, 1956. In view of further investigations made and the report of the Administrative Officer, Councilman Coons moved that the extension of time be granted for a period of one year for the filing of Tract Noo 18120 Councilman Fry seconded the motione MOTION CARRIED. TRACT NO. 2688 - REQUEST FOR pXTENSION OF TIME: Request submitted by D~ E. Stevens, Engineer, representing the subdivider of Tract Noo 2688, for an extension of time for a period of one year was submitted and reado On the recommendations of the City Engineer, George E~ Holyoke, Councilman Schutte moved that the extension of time for the requested period of one year be granted $ Councilman Wisser seconded the motiono MOTION CARRIED. TRACT NO. 2569 - REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME: Request submitted by D~ ~. Stevens, Engineer, representing the subdivider of Tract No. 2569, for an extension of time for a period of one year was submitted and readg On the recommendations of the City Engineer, George E. Holyoke, Councilman Coons moved th~t an extension of time for a period of six months be grantedo Councilman Wisser seconded the motione MOTION CARRIED. YARIANCE NO. 648: Submitted by Lloyd A. Mannes, requesting pennission to erect a medical building for professional art on property located east of Brookhurst and south of Niobe Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 85, granted said Variance, subject to the following conditions: l~ The filing of a tentative map of Tract No. 2713 at the rear of the property which map has not yet been filed with the Commissione 2. The erection of a six foot masonry wall along the rear 100 feet of the property requested for the professional offices. 3. Dedication of 20 feet along Brookhurst Street for street widening 4. Engineering requirementS0 No action was taken by the City Council~ VARIANCE..NO" 649; Submi tted by James Lombardo, requesting permission to use the corner room of his apartment house located at 503 West Vermont Avenue for a beauty shop. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 86, granted said Variance, subject to arranging for a legal waiver by the apolicant of the deed restrictions presently on the property. No action was taken by the City Council. VARIANCE NO. 650: Submitted by Altha A. Dietsch, requesting permission to continue the use of the rear building at 817 North Sabina Street as two apartments. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 87, granted said Variance. No action was taken by the City Councilo VARIANCE NO. 651: Submitted by Amberwood Corporation, requesting variation from the Code with reference to rear yard setbacks on certain lots within Tra~t No. 2370, which is located at the northwest corner of Nutwood Street and Cerritos Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution NOe 88, granted said Variance for a waiver of rear yard setbacks on the particular lots requested in the VarianceC!l No action was taken by the City Council. ~ -, ~ 1 j at 1767 City Hall,. Anaheim, California, November l3. 1956 - 7:0q P.M. VARIANCE NO. 652: Submitted by Barney Thoele, requesting permission to continue the operations of the retail sale of finished fireplace wood and split wood at 10472 Lincoln Avenue. ,-- The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 8'), denied Variance No. 652 inasmuch as it is an M-I use, but that the applicant be given three months to clean up the wood presently on the property and that no additional wood is to be brought in for processing. No action was taken by the City Council. REVIEW NO. 0: Submitted by William S. MacTavish, requesting that a Special Use Permit be granted for the conduction of teen-age dancing at 13~ West Center Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 90, granted said Special Use Permit for teen-age dancing classes, subject to the conduct of these classes as outlined by the Applicant and subject to revocation if these conditions are not enforced. List~d below are the conditions as outlined in the application. 1. Classes to be held from 8:00 o'clock P.M. to 12:00 o'clock P.M. 2. There shall be no smoking. Anyone caught doing so shall be immediately eliminated from the dance club. 3. Liquor shall be barred in any form. Anyone trying to gain en- trance to these dances with liquor on their persons or under its influence shall be barred as well as their membership dis~ontinued. 4. No one shall leave the dance during said hours unless there be a written request or phone call by their parents. 5. There shall be present four or more parents as chaperons. Any parent may visit free any of these teen-age functions. 6. There shall be a required dress at each functional dance. Jackets with club insignia of any organization shall not be allowed. 7. These dances shall be conducted to a conformity with absolutely no petting, suggestive dancing or anyting pertaining to such. No action was taken by the City Council. 9ITY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 84: City Planning Commission Resolution No. 84 entitled, itA RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING a:>MMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY mUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM THAT THE SANTA ANA FREEWAY BE CHANGED FROM A FREEWAY TO A LANDSCAPED FREEWAY"; and further that: 1. That an Ordinance be enacted to proh~bit display advertising along the Santa Ana Freeway in accordance with the provisions Of the Highway Department for landscaped freeways. 2. That an Ordinance be enacted to request the California State Departme~ of Public Works, Division of Highways, to declare the Santa Ana Freeway a Land- scaped Freeway and that funds be allocated to change its character from a Freeway to a Landscaped Freeway. RESOLUTION NO. 3567: Councilman Wisser offered Resolution No. 3567 and moved for its passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book, page ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REOUESTING THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS, OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, TO DECLARE THE SANTA ANA FRE~WAY A r.AND~CAP~Tl FRJ;RWAYJ AND REQUESTING THAT FUNDS BE ALLOCATED TO CHANGE ITS CHARACTER FROM A FREEWAY TOA LANDSCAPED FREEWAY. On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: CDUNCILMEN: rnUNCILMEN: mUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser. None. None. The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted. 1768 City Hall, Anaheim, California, November 13, 1956 - 7:00 P.M. ORDINANCE NO. 1099: Councilman Coons offered Ordinance No. 1099 for final reading and moved for its passage and adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book, page AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO SAID CITY OF ANAHEIM OF CERTAIN INHABITED TERRITORY KNOWN AS BALL-DALE ANNEXATION. ~ After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance No. 1099 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Coons moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Wisser seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. On roll call the foregoing Ordinance No. 1099 was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: (DUNe I LMEN 1 CDUNClLMEN: mUNClLMENI Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser. None. None. The Mayor declared the foregoing Ordinance duly passed and adopted. LEGAL ADVERTISING - CALL FOR BIDS: The City Clerk was authorized to publish a notice inviting sealed proposals for the City of Anaheim legal advertising, bids to be opened November 27, 1956, 7100 o'clock P.M., on motion by Councilman Fry, seconded by Councilman Coons. MOTION CARRIED, CX>MPLETION OF JOB NO. 10691 George E. Holyoke, City Engineer, certified that Plumbing Contractors, Inc. had completed the construction of the Lewis Street Sewer, Job No. 1069, in accordance with plans and speCifications, and recommended the ac- ceptance of the work. RBSOLVTION NO. 3568: Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 3568 and moved for its passage and adoption. .-...., Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACChPTTNG THE COM- PLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PER- FORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CDNSTRUCT AND OJMPLE1E THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVE- MENT: THE LEWIS STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENT, FROM BALL ROAD TO A POTNT 1 ,000 FPPT SOUTH THEREOF, JOB NO. 1069. On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the fo.llowing vote; AYES: NOESa ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: mUNCI LMEN : CDUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coon~, Fry, Schutte and Wisser. None. None. The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 3569: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 3569 and moved for its passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book, page :~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OOUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AOCEPTING A GRANT DEED. mNVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES. (James Donald Duval) On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYESI NOESI ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: mUNCl LMEN: cnUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser. None. None. The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted. 1769 City Hallt Anaheim, qalifornia, November 13, 1956 - 7:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 3570: Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 3570 and moved for its passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CDNVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY, TOGETHER WITH THE YffiLL,. ,-- METER AND APPURTENANCES THERETO, LOCATED ON SAID PROPERTY, FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES. (Nutwood Properties, Inc.) ,......-. I ,-- On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: cnUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser. None. None. The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 3571: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 3571 and moved for its passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DESIGNATING AND AP- POINTING HAROLD DAOUST AS A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO SIGN FOR AND ACCEPT SURPLUS FEDERAL PROPERTY FOR CIVIL DEFENSE PURPOSES. (Harold Daoust, Purchasing Agent) On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser. None. None. The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted. ORAM3EWOOD DEVELOPMENT CDRPORATION: Communication from Mr. Paul MeR. Jones, own~t of fotty"acres on'the south side of Katella, between Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street, was submitted and read regarding the recent inspection made of the problem of access into the Nixon Drive-In site from south bound traffic on Harbor Boulevard and west bound traffic on Katella Avenue, and the possible construction of a traffic island and divider strip on these roads. The letter contained suggestions for a traffic pattern and an offer to provide an access road to relieve traffic, ^carrying it westerly to the existing entrance driveway into the Nixon site. CANCELLATION OF CITY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by COuncil- man Fry, cancellation of City Taxes on property purchased by the State of California Division of Highways for highway purposes and formerly assessed to Arthur Hartelt was authorized. MOTION CARRIED. FINANCIAL AND OPERATING REPORTS: Financial and operating reports for the month of October, 1956, were ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Fry, seconded by Councilman Coons. MOTION CARRIED. LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION: The Administrative Officer reported the following for on-sale general licensesl Orange Crest Corporation (Crest Dinner Inn Club) 2571 West La Palma; Forest G Smith, Jr. (Clock), 1770 South Harbor Boulevard; and off-sale general license, James A. Hume, Disneyland Hotel Sundrie and Liquor, l44l South West Street; and on-sale beer and wine license, Donna F. and Joseph DelGiorgio, 1108 North Palm street. Councilman Coons moved that the City Council instruct the City Attorney to object to the license application of Donna F. and Joseph DelGiorgio on the grounds that it is adjacent to the La Palma Park recreation area, the Anaheim- Fullerton Municipal Court, and the Horace-Mann School. Councilman Fry seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 1770 City Ha,ll, Anaheim, Califo_rnia, November 13, 1956 - 7,:00 P.Mo - . PURCHASE OF VEHICLES: The Administrative Officer reported the following informal bid proposals for the purchase of two ranch wagons: Cone Bros. Chevrolet $ 4,089014 McCoy Motor Company -- Ford $ 3,881.64 (No Plymouth bid available) il Councilman Fry moved that purchase order be issued for the purchase of two Ford Ranch Wagons from the McCoy Motor Company, Councilman Schutte seconded the motiono MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF TRANSFORMERs George F. Oelkers, Director of Public Utilities reported that informal bid proposals had been received from the Kuhlman, General Electric Company, and Line-Material (Pennsylvania), for the sum of $4,808s00, and from the Niagara Company for the sum of $4,389.00. He further advised that the Niagara quoted ten to twelve weeks delivery after approval of the drawings, and that in view of the urgency and time element involved, he did not plan to prepare a drawing, and, therefore, recommended the acceptance of the General Electric CompanyVs bid and further advised that they had promised shipment January 11, 1957 if awarded the contract for the three transformerso Councilman Coons stated that these transformers were needed to relieve the overload on the facilities of the Essex Wire Corporation and in view of the time factor being the essence of this transaction, moved to purchase the three 833 KVA Transformers from the General Electric Company at $4,808.00 each, F.O.B. factory with freight allowed to Anaheim,Californiao COuncilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. EXEMPT BUSINESS LICENSE: Request from the Good She~ Lutheran Home of the West was submitted, requesting a waiver of the usual business license fee for their Thrift Shop operated at 244 E. Center Street by volunteer personnel, so that all funds earned can be applied toward aiding mentally handicapped children. ~ 1 i Said request was granted and waiver of usual business license fee ordered on motion by Councilman Fry, seconded by Councilman Coons. MOTION CARRIED. PLUMBER BONDS: Plumber Bond submitted by Robbins and Wann Plumbing Company,and Edward A. Harrison were ordered received and filed when approved by the City Attorney on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Fry. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1105: Councilman Fry offered Ordinance Nos 1105 and moved for its passage and adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book, page AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ARTICLE III, CHAPTER 2, SECTION 3256 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO A NEW SUBDIVISION TO BE DESIGNATED "(i)". (Parking limitations on Lemon Street between Broadway and Cypress) Ordinance No. ll05 was read in full. On roll call Ordinance No. 1105 was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: -, AYES: NOES: ABSENT: CDUNCI U1EN : mUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser~ None. Noneo The Maydr declared the foregoing Ordinance duly passed and adopted. Councilman Schutte moved to adjourn to November 20, 1956, 7:00 O'Clock P.M. Councilman Coons seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED. a- t... '- SIGNED: It L-?,,<- )Jr., 2X~~~ Ci ty Clerk