Loading...
1956/12/11 1198 Ci ~v Ha1lJ ,Anaheim\, Califo~nia, ,De~embe~.,,~I~~6 - ,,11.00 A.,M~ PERSONNEL: The Administrative Officer reported the appointment of the following personnel: Norbert V. Mang, Patrolman, Police Department; Harold L. Looney, Athletic Official and Gerald Gray, Athletic Official. Said appointments were approved by the City Council on motion by Councilman Coons, secondep by Councilman Fry. MOTION CARRIED. OVERTIME PARKING: The Administrative Officer was authorized to proceed.with necessary arrangements for additional patrolling to further enforce the two hour parking limits on off-street parking lots. Councilman Fry moved to adjourn. Councilman Coons seconded the motion~ MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED.g\ ,~ C)' _. " SIGNED: ./ L-& 711- AJ~*/;;.J -, ' ""'city Clerk "~ ~ City _Hall" Ana_he~m~ Ca~~fornia1 ,December .11" 1?5Q - ?:OO P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in Regular Session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser. ABSENT: COUl<C I LMEN: No ne . CITY ATTORNEY: Preston Turner, Present. CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: Keith A. Murdoch, Present. MINUTeS: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting held November 27, 1956 and Adjourned Regular Meetings held November 30th and December 6th, 1956, were approved on motion by Councilman Wisser, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. !~ RESOLUTION NO. 3599: Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 3599 and moves for its passage and adoptiono Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUrcIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND DIRECTING THE PAYMENT OF DP~NDS AGAINST THE CITY AS OF DECEMBER 11, 1956. ($239,251.22) On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN I coutCILMENa COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser. None. None. The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted. BID PROPOSALS - JO~ NO. .1081: Pursuant to Resolution No. 3574 and Legal Notice duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin November 24th and 30th, 1956, on motion by Council- man Wisser, seconded by Councilman Fry, the City Clerk was instructed to open bid proposals for the Burton Street Sewer Improvement from Acacia Street to a point 900 feet westerly, Job No. 1081. MOTION CARRIED. BIDS RECEIVED -, S. & Sa Construction 1632 Wo 226th Street Torrance, California (Accompanied bya Bid Bond in the amount of $503.50) $ 5,030.00 J.P.S. Contracting Co., Inc. 12084 Westminster Boulevard Santa Ana, California (Accompanied by a Bid Bond in the amount of $340.50) $ 3,405.00 W. I. Ro ck 2425 Almira Fullerton, California (Accompanied by a Bid Bond in the amount of 10%) $ 3,102.50 1799 City Hall. Anaheim. Californla, ,D,ecember 11, 1956~- 7:00 P~Mo Leo Weiler Company 10616 Stanford Avenue Garden Grove, California Eli) Eo Bernard 5868 Lime Avenue Long Beach 5, California r I t Elmer Eo Barnett 13152 Century Boulevard Garden Grove, California Chris Evanovich 537 Oakford Drive Los Angeles 22, California (Accompanied by a Bid Bond in the amount of 10%) $ 3,440000 (Accompanied by a Bid Bond in the amount of 10%) $ 4,695000 (Accompanied by a Bid Bond in the amount of 10%) $ 3,245000 (Accompanied by a Bid Bond in th& amount of 10%) $ 3,440000 (Accompanied by a Bid bond in the amount of $270~60o ) Plumbing Contractors, Inc. 11662 East Westminster Boulevard Garden Grove, California $ 2,706.00 Bids were referred to the City Engineer for tabulation and report on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Fry. MOTION CARRIED. After tabulation, the City Engineer reported the Plumbing Contractors, Inco to be low bidder ($2,706.00) and recommended the acceptance of said bid. RESOLUTION NO. 3600: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 3600 and moved for its passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PRO- POSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT, AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE BURTON STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENT FROM ACACIA STREET TO A POINT 900 FEET WESTERLY, JOB NO, 108} ~ r- On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser. Noneo Noneo The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adoptedo BIQ,~RQPOSALS - JOB NOo_1082: Pursuant to Resolution Noo 3575 and Legal Notice duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin, November 24th and 30th, 1956, on motion by Councilman Wisser, secqnded by Councilman Schutte, the City Clerk was in- structed to open bid proposals for the Lincoln-Brookhurst Sewer Improvement on Brookhurst to a point 620 feet south of Lincoln and on the south side of Lincoln to a point 1250 feet east of Brookhurst, Job Noo 10820 MOTION CARRIED. r- Leo Weiler Company 10616 Stanford Avenue Garden Grove, California S & S Construction 1632 W. 226th Street Torrance, California JoPoSo Contracting Coo, Inco 12084 Westminster Boulevard Santa Ana, California BID RECEIVED (Accompanied by a Bid Bond in the amount of 10%) $ 15,081.50 (Accompanied by a Bid Bond in the amount of $1,836050) $ 18,464.00 (Accompanied by a Bid Bond in the amount of $1,216.95) $ 12,109.50 1800 City Hall, Anaheim. California, Decembe,r 1_1. 1Sl>6 - 7:00 PoM. Elmer E~ Barnett 13152 Century Boulevard Garden Grove, California Chris Evanovich 537 Oakford Drive Los Angeles 22, California Plumbing Contractors, Inc~ 11662 Es Westminster Boulevard Garden Grovet California (Accompanied by a Bid Bond in the amount of 10%) $ 12,849050 (Accompanied by a Bid Bond in the amount of 10%) $ 11,981000 (Accompanied by a Bid Bond in the amount of $1,090030) ......., $ 10,903ltOO Bids were referred to the City Engineer for tabulation and report on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Fry 0 MOTION CARRIED. After tabulation, the City Engineer reported the Plumbing Contractors, Inc. to be low bidder ($10,903000) and recommended the acceptance of said bidlt RESOLUTION NO. 3601; Councilman Wisser offered Resolution Noo 3601 and moved for its passage and adoptione Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT, AND, ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE LINCOLN-BROOKHURST SEWER IMPROVEMENT, ON BROOKHURST TO A POINT 620 FEET SOUTH OF LINCOLN, AND ON LINCOLN TO A POINT 1250 FEET EAST OF BROOKHURST. JOB NO. 1082Q On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN, ~ Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wissere Nonee Noneo The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adoptede BID PROPOSALS - JOB NO. 129: Pursuant to Resolution Noo 3576 and Legal Notice duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin November 24th and 30th, 1956, on motion by Councilman Wisser, seconded by Councilman Schutte, the City Clerk was instructed to open bid proposals for the Haster-Katella Street Improvement on the west side of Haster Street from Katella Avenue to the Freeway and on the north side of Kateila Avenue from Haster Street westerly 660 feet, Job Noo 1290 MOTION CARRIED. Cox Bros. Construction Co~ P. 00 Box nc" Stanton, California Griffith Company 1060 South Broadway Los Angeles 15, California Sully-Miller Contracting Coo 19761 Old County Park Road PoO~ Box 432 Orange, California BIDS RECEIVED (Accompanied by a Bid Bond in the amount of 10%) $ 7,899.92 (Accompanied by a Bid Bond in the amount of $1,000800) $ 8,984070 (Accompanied by a Certified Check Noo 6709 in the amount of $1,0000) ~ $ 7,753092 Bids were referred to the City Engineer for tabulation and report on motion by Councilman Coons~ seconded by Councilman Wissere MOTION CARRIED. After tabulation, the City Engineer reported the Sully-Miller Contracting Company to be low bidder ($7,753092) and recommended the acceptance of said bid. 1801 City Hall, Anaheim, California, December 11, 1956 - 7:00 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 3602i Councilman Fry offered Resolution Noo 3602 and moved for its passage and adoptiono Refer to Resolution Book, page r- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PRO- POSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRA~T TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT, AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE HASTER-KATELLA STREET IMPROVEMENT t ON HASU;R STRFET FROM KI\ un .LA A VFNUF TO Ttffi FR~WA Y, .AND ON KA TELLA A VENUE FROM HASTER STREET WESTERLY 660 FEET. JOB NO. 12? 0 On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wissero None. None. The Mayor declared the forego~ng Resolution duly passed and adopted. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 631: Submitted by James Sparkes, re- questing that property described briefly as located north of Lincoln Avenue, east of Stanton Avenue be used for a dump for earth, trash, and other materials other than oil well rotary mud. Public hearing was held on this matter November 13, 1956 at which time said hearing was continued to this date~ The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 64, granted said Variance for a commercial dump for non-combustible materials. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council on the matter. ,--- Communication dated December 10, 1906 from Butler~Harbour Construction Company (Merrill Butlerj Jro) was submitted and read in fullo Mro Butler ad- dressed the Council opposing the Variance and reiterated the points and recom- mendations noted in the letter, should the Variance be granted, as follows: l~ That the disposal station only be operated between the hours of 9:00 AsMo and 4:30 PoMo 20 That the fill material be restricted to non-combustible material, such as dirt, broken concrete, tree stumps, etco 3~ Before the disposal station is closed each evening that a sanitary earth fill be placed over the material deposited during the course of the day. 40 That the County be required to treat the fill with chemicals to prevent the creation of odor and to maintain the fill in a sanitary conditione 50 That the ingress and egress to the disposal station be restricted to Stanton Avenueo 60 That the disposal station be fenced with a 5 fto high chain link fenceo 7~ That at the conclusion of the filling operation by the County, the property be returned to the City of Anaheim for the subsequent authorization of a public park and recreation area. Also in this regard may the Council adopt a resolution to the effect that the City of Anaheim will accept such a dedication and will so construct a recreation areao ;"--' Mrs Jacobs, Attorney, addressed the City Council favoring the granting of the Variance and with reference to the letter previously read, made the following comments: Suggestion 1: He felt to be rather regulatory and would not be objectionableo Suggestion 2~ If you limit the operation you don,Vt have a dump. Suggestion 3~ He felt to be impossible~ He suggested though that a regulatio~which certainly would be reasonabl~would to be after a certain amount of fill is made that the next day the dirt should be placed over the matter that had been dumpedo He felt it would be a rather difficult situation when you have a small amount of dumping one day to stay there and operate a tractor to press the material down in the time limit specified aboveo 1802 City Hall, Anaheim, California, December 11, 1956 ~ 7:00 PoM. Suggestion 4: He felt to be not out of line in certain respects pro- viding whatever is dumped there causes an odoro Suggestion 5: He made the statement that they had a road coming in there at the present timeo Suggestion 6: He questioned this, wondering why it would be necessary to put a chain link fence around the disposal areae Su~gestion 7: He felt would probably be all righto ...-, Mr. Jacobs stated that he would recommend that where you have a cut and fill operation to fill it five feet and then tractor or press down and place at least 12 inches of dirt over the fill~ Further, there should be some provision for fire protection either by foamite or tanks with hose length enough to reach all locationso He felt that some of the suggestions contained in the letter to be very good and should be considered by the City Council, and in regards to other suggestions they should be ironed out a littleo A gentlemen from the audience speaking on behalf of the Butler-Harbour communication, advised the Council he did not feel it unreasonable to require that the area be fenced and in regards to chemicals, he believed that to be now an accepted procedure~ He further stated that if the dump is to be granted, it would be appreciated if the procedure as contained in the letter would be establishedo Mro Butler advised that he asked for the fence because it was the only means to protect that area and to protect the children at playo Further, every area developed by them, where there is a flood control channel or storm drain, a fence is requiredo He did not feel that the fence presently constructed would give as much protection to the children as would a chain link fenceo Suggested conditions for operation of disposal and reclamation site near Stanton Avenue and Lincoln Avenue were read in full and are as follows: 1. That access to site be limited to Stanton Avenue in order to minimize a traffic hazard already existing on Lincoln AvenueG 20 That the entire area be fenced with a minimum of a six foot chain link ~ fences 30 Tha t operations not be 40 That $100,0000 50 That adequate fire protection equipment be provided and maintained to extinguish a fire readilyo 60 That the filling operation be of the cut and cover type with an 12" minimum dirt covers That all disposal material be covered within 24 hours and that the day's disposal material be surrounded by a dirt fire wallo 70 That disposal material include no garbageo 80 That disposal materials deposited within 50 feet of the site boundaries be limited to non~combustible materials onlyo 90 That adequate and effective chemicals be available on the site and used for the elimination of offensive odors if any such odors temporarily arise in the operationo 100 That the depth of excavation be limited in conformance with the re- commendations of the Water Pollution Boardo 110 That proper equipment be employed to adequately compact the disposal material@ 120 Director of 130 140 15@ of compacted an attendant be present during all hours of operationo That conducted after 8:00 PoMo dailyo liability insurance be carried in an amount not less than That dust control measures be employed to the satsifaction of the Public Workso That no burning be allowedo That no salvage operations be conducted at this site& The disposal material be covered in layers of a maximum of four feet material plus the 12n minimum dirt covero ~ Mr. Jacobs spoke with reference to the fencing situation and felt that the Council should require a fence around that area being used for the dump and that this would be more effective than to fence the entire area at one time because when the dirt is removed it would necessitate changing the fence each timeo Refer to Condition Noo 80 Mro Jacobs felt that 25 feet from the site boundaries would be sufficiento 1803 .. Ci_tv .Ha_ll, ~na.hei~,_ C~li-forniat Dec~mber 11, 1956 - 7=.00 P.M. _ _ Refer to Condition No. 140 Mr. Jacobs advised that there is always iron and other valuable materials that can be salvaged from a dump and that if you limit the salvage operation to the owner, it would be fair, but that to eliminate complete salvage would be unfair. He felt that the Council in establishing this condition meant not to allow the public to salvage from the dump. f) Mre Butler asked the definition of garbageo Mr. Murdoch, City Administrative Officer, read from the Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 5200, the definition of garbage. Further discussion was held by the City Council on the matter of limiting the deposit of non-combustible materials within 50 feet of the site boundaries. It was determined that this condition should stand in order that a safe bank along the exterior boundaries may be built back up and maintained. Mr. Sparkes advised that the deepest part of the pit was approximately 40 or 45 feet and that excavation is to the easterly property line. With reference to Condition NO.4, the Administrative Officer re- commended a minimum amount of liability insurance of $100,000.00 and stated that further investigation would be made into the matter to see if this would be sufficient. Mr. Butler called attention to the redesign of the highway and advised that there would be a divider strip along Lincoln Avenue and that the first opening to the east will be directly across from their development. He felt the trucks would drive east and turn left at this opening to return to the dump site, thereby creating an additional traffic ha~ard. - I Discussion followed with reference to the Orange County Board of Supervisors committing themselves with regard to donating the site to the City of Anaheim for a Park Site when the pit is filled. The City Attorney advised that the Orange County Board of Supervisors could declare what they intend to do with the property when filled, if and when they acquire it. Future zoning of the area was discussed, the area being presently zoned R-A. There being no further discussion on the matter, the Mayor declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 3603: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 3603 and moved for its passage and adoption, granting Variance No. 631 subject to the fifteen conditions as established. Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 631. On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT & caUl<<: I LMEN : COUNCI LMEN I COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser. None. None. r- · The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 639:. Submitted by the County of Orange requesting permission to establish a County Disposal Station (cut and cover system) on various parcels of property located north of lincoln Avenue and east of Stanton Boulevard. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 73, granted said Variance subject to the following conditions: That the dump be used for a cut and cover type of dump, with all garbage, trees and tree trunks to be excluded and no burningo 1804 City Hall. Anaheim, ,California, December 11. 1956 - 7:00 PoMo A review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was ordered by the City Council to be held November 13, 1956, 7100 PoMo, at which time an appeal was filed by Attorney James Eo Walker on behalf of Clarence Wo Rains and Dollie Po Rains, and with mutual consent, public hearing was ordered held this dateo The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council on the mattero Mro James Walker, Attorney, addressed the City Council on behalf of Mro ~ and Mrso Rains and urged the Council's denial of Variance Noo 639 because the County of Orange at the time they applied for Variance, was neither owner or lessee of the property, and in his opinion, had no right to make the applicationo Further, the application was made without the consent, approval, or knowledge of the owners of the propertyo He felt, in this respect, this application differs from the Sparkes application, and in view of the action on the Variance requested by Mro Sparkes, he felt that the fair and just thing to do would be to deny the County of Orange application for the reasons stated and enable the Rains to file an ap- plication on their own account as owners of the propertyo Mro Walker further advised that the Rains property and the Sparkes pro- perty were operated as one pit under joint management of the owners of the property. Further, that Mr. and Mrs. Rains would be willing to accept the fifteen cantlitions as established in the Resolution granting the Variance to Mr. Sparkes. He felt there was no reason to discuss the conditions further as he had heard them and heard them discussed and that they appeared to be legally reasonable, practicable and necessary, taking into account the public interest and public safety: Mr. Walker felt that the action taken on the Sparkes Variance to be con- sistant with the free enterprise system in the operation and development of private property by private ownership and earnestly requested that the City exercise their right and reject the County application for Variance on the ground that it was prematurely filed and prematurely considered by the City Planning Commission, thereby leaving the matter open for further proceedings. 1------ Mr. J. A. Stinson, 8812 Lincoln Avenue, addressed the Council commending the Council on granting the Variance to Mr. Sparkeso There being no further discussion on the matter, the Mayor declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 36041 Councilman Coons offered Resolution Noo 3604 and moved for its passage and adoption, granting Variance application No. 639 to the County of Orange, subject to the fifteen conditions previously established in granting Variance Noo 631 (Resolution Noo 3603) and further subject to the acquisition and perfection of title am the completion of the condemnation proceedingso Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTTNG VARIANC~ NO.. 6390 (Refer to page 1805 for roll call) Mro Jacobs stated that if you grant the Variance to be effective when the County obtains possession of the property, they might not complete title for one and one-h~lf yearso Mr. Turner, City Attorney, questioned whether they could get an order for im- mediate possessiono It was his understanding that an order for immediate possession was limited to flood control, highways and streets. Mro Walker advised that he was surprised by this action and was relying on the provision of the Ordinance that the applications for Variance shall be made by the owner or lessee of the propertyo He stated that there was no dispute that the County was not the owner nor the lessee of the property on the date of their applicationo Mayor Pearson asked if they had started any action at all on the con- demnation proceedings. Mr. Walker stated that action to condemn the property had not been institutedo Whether the Resolution to condemn this property had been instituted and was effective he did not knowo He asked if the Council felt the basis of the application was legal and further, since it was a legal problem and that they had forty days in which to make their decision, suggested that necessary time be allowed to further meet these matters. He further stated that Mr. Sparkes' application was filed first and then the County of Orange asked for a Variance on the Rains and the Sparkes property, which was already under consideration. Mr. and Mrs. Rains have made no application for ......, 1805 Ci ty Hal.l~ Anaheim, California, December 11, 1956 - 7:00. P.M. r I Variance and if the effect of the action that is proposed to be taken by the City Council is to leave the Rains in a position where they can not now file a Variance, he was unable to follow that line of reasoning. He stated that the Rains should not be penalized because they failed to get their Variance in before Sparkes and that it seemed unjust to treat the Rains any differently than to treat the Sparkes. He again advised that the County had no right as owner or lessee when they filed for a Variance and that the action to condemn was filed after the action of the variance was filed. Mr. Turner advised the Resolution to acquire the title was adopted by the Orange County Board of Supervisors in August of this year and that they filed suit to condemn the property on September 19, 1956. Further, the application for the Variance was dated September 20, 1956, filed with the City Planning Com- mission and in the file before them for consideration. Mr. Walker stated that it would be noted that no representative was here from the County of Orange and that another solution to the problem would be to deny the County's application without prejudice, pending the acquisition of the property, and then, if the County was interested in getting the Variance they could come in and file again, and the Rains could file theirs, and the City Council then could consider whether the Variance be given to the Rains or to the County of Orange. In that way, it would preserve ~he County's right and they would come in on the same standing on a new application. Further, he believed that it was very possible that the County of Orange would not file again. In this way, he felt it would permit the Rains to have a Variance the same as the Sparkes, and seemed to him to be a fair solution that would get all out of a technical difficulty, as it was, he felt it to be a clear discrimination against the Rains. r' Mayor Pearson stated that in his op~nlon the City is much better pro- tected by granting this Variance with these conditions established and that it would be better for the City to have them operate this dump under these re- gulations than theirs. Further, there was nothing to preclude Mr. and Mrs. Rains from filing an application for' Variance immediately. Mr. Turner advised that any Variance that the City would grant to the County of Orange now would have to be on condition of acquisition of the property through condemnation or purchase" The filing action did not make the County of Orange owners and would not until a judgment has been entered in that action, however, he thought it did give them sufficient right to justify them in making an application for Variance. He further advised that filing the condemnation suit creates a cloud upon the title and they do acquire the right to pursue that to the conclusion and acquire the title, and that any variance would be inactive until they do acquire the title, and that the County of Orange would have no jurisdiction until the suit is settled. Mr. Walker stated that that sounded alright to him. On roll call the foregoing Resolution No. 3604 was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser. None. None. The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted. ,,--. VARIANCE NO...6~4; Submitted by Mr. J. M. Hammerman, requesting permission to install a bowling alley at 312 North Los Angeles street. Public h~aring was held November 20, 1956 and continued to this date for the decision of D~. Gendel with reference to the property owned by him and involved in this Variance. Mr. Mungall, Secretary of the City Planning Commission, reported that Dr. Gendel planned to rent the Church, thereby automatically voiding the Variance granted by the City Planning Commission, thereupon, the Mayor declared the hearing closed. 1806 City Hall, Anaheim, California, .December 11, 1956 - 7:00 PoMo RESOLUTION NO. 3605: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution Noo 3605 and moved for its passage and adoptiono Refer to Resolution Book, page ~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 644. On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: n AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUt-CILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wissero None. None. The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION F-56-57-21: Submitted by Spadrom Estates requesting R-3 Zoning on Lots 1 to 64, Tract No. 2624, which is located on the north side of Romneya Drive between West Street and Euclid Avenue. Public hearing was held on the matter November 27, 1956 at which time said hearing was continued to this date. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 82, recommended said Reclassification be denied. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council on the mattero Mro Barry Hichens, 1213 West Romneya Drive, representing home owners directly beside the proposed rezoning addressed the Council in opposition to the rezoning. Mr. Bernard, Attorney, addressed the City Council urging the granting of the Reclassification and presented an additional letter from a manufacturing concern interested in housing facilities for their personnelo He further advised the City Council that they would have stipulated deed restrictions that would be followed to the letter. 'I Mr. Moffitt, 1302 Lombard Drive, addressed the City Council and advised that when the property was purchased by the Lesser Enterprises it was zoned R-l and also that the rezoning would increase the traffic problem and endanger the children. Mro Bernard advised the Clty Council that the Lesser Enterprises had the property zoned R-l and had made a mistake that they were now trying to correct9 Mrs~ Borne, 1258 Lombard Drive, addressed the City'Council and stated she would rather have a home owner next to' her, one that would be interested in his home and school, rather than a renter that may be a transient. Mro Bergeron, 1232 Lombard Drive, addressed the Council and stated that he was a resident-owner of the property that backs up to the property on which they are planning to build multiple units. He felt the City Planning Commission had foresight in rezoning this area R-l and that it should remain as presently zonedo Mra Hichens called attention to the petition which was in excess of 150 names in opposition to the rezoning. There being no further discussion, the Mayor declared the hearing closed. 'I I RESOLUTION NO. 3606: Councilman Fry offered Resolution NOQ 3606 and moved for its passage and adoptiono Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (F-56-57-21) 1807 City H~ll. Anaheim. California9 December 11. 1956 - 7:00 P.M. On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES, NOES: ABSENT: COUlCILMEN: COUOCILMEN, COUNCILMEN : Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser. None. None. r The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSI FICATION F-!16-~7-?~: Submi tted by M. J. Thiesen, et aI, requesting ~l Zoning on properties described briefly as located on the west side of Euclid Avenue between Lincoln Avenue and the Santa Ana Freeway. Public Hearing was held on this matter November 20, 1956 and continued to this date so that the right-of-way problem could be resolved before action of the Ci~y Council. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 91, recommended said Reclassification. Keith A. Murdoch, Administrative Officer, reported that the Engineering Department had made a study of the traffic situation adjacent the intersections of Euclid and Lincoln Avenues and that there was sufficient room on the present right~of-way, plus that which the State has purchased or is about to purchase, for a conversion of the right hand lane to a 12 foot travel lane with no parking to take care of the traffic out of the industrial plants in this area and also the south bound traffic from the Freeway onto Euclid, therefore, no additional right- of-way would be necessary. There being no further discussion on the matter, the Mayor declared the hearing closed. r-": RESOLUTION NO. ~~nRI Councilman Wisser offered Resolution No. 3608 and moved for its passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINI~ THAT A CB4NGJ! OF ZONP IS NECESSARY IN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE CITY AND THAT ARTICLE IX, CHAPTER 2 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL COOE SI{)ULD BE AMENDED TO ACCOMPUSH SAID CHANGE OF ZONE. (F-56-57-23 - M-l ZoninQ) On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following votel AYESa NOES: ABSENT I cauteI LMEN I COUOCILMENa COUtCILMENI Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wisser. None. None. The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted. PUBUC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION F-56-57-26. Submitted by Bob's Super Markets, Inc. and Mary E. Morgan, requesting C-l Zoning on property described briefly as the southeast corner of Ball Road and Knott Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 93, recommended said Reclassification, subject to the following conditionsl r-- 10 The filing of the City of Anaheim standard deed restrictions for C-l Neighborhood Commercial. 20 The deeding of 20 feet along Ball Road and Knott Avenue for street widening. 30 Engineering requirements. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council on the matter. A Petition containing 15 signatures protesting the Reclassification was submitted and read. 1808 _ Ci \y H~lll Ana~el~" Cal~ f~rnla.\ Decembe~ 1,1\ 19,56 - 7&00 PoM, Mr. Robert Lo Haneline, 7091 Ball Road, addres~ed ~he Counc~l and advised that the Savanna School District had recently purchased the 15 acre site directly across the street from this location, and with the new subdivision tract located to the east the children would be within walking distance of the new school and would have to pass the intersection where the market 1s to be locatedo He felt that with the widening of the two streets, the area remaining would not be large enough for a business and further advised that within one mile in three directions there would soon be shopping centers which would be larger with more adequate off ~ street parking and more convenient to reach. He further stated that the rezoning would downgrade their propertyo Mayor Pearson asked what the property could be used for being located next to the railroad track. qr Leonard Smith presented the layout of the proposed market. Mr. D. W. Roper, 9971 Knott Avenue, owner of the northwest corner and owner of a large chicken ranch (l~,OOO chickens), asked if the rezoning was granted, ~ould it be mandatory that they put 1n curbs and make the necessary dedication of land on both avenues even if all of the property was not used at this time. The answer was "Yes", the subdivider putsin the curbs. Mr. Roper adv1sed the City Council that he did not object to the Variance. Al Wolf, 7223 Ball Road, stated he was a resident of this location for 33 years and that the markets east of them were not adequate and it would be an advantage to them to have a large market so clo'se which would increase property values. He felt the children were not 1n any danger, however, he would not be 1n favor of the store selling beer or liquor. Rev. R. I. Reid, 7031 Ball Road, addressed the Council in opposition to the Reclassification and stated they purchased the property and build their homes there and felt this would downgrade their value. He objected also because there would be liquor sold 1n the store which would be within ~OO feet from the proposed new school. He felt this development would create a traffic hazard, and further, they had heard that there was to be built a restaurant where beer and liquor would be sold which would be a congregating place for those they considered might be un- desirable. ~ Mr. Young, 9922 Knott Avenue, stated he lived next door to the proposed market and that at the time the service station variance was granted by the County 'of Orange he appeared before that body objecting to said variance and that the reason more objections were not entered was because the people in the area were unaware that it was being consideredo Mr. Chandler, Attorney, advised that for some time Ball Road and Knott Avenue have been proposed 100 foot highwlys, which will be helvily traveled "fast roade. That the subdivisions being built do not face onto Ball Road but Ire all facing on inside streets having center stre.ts leading out to Ball Road. Further, that the lady owning this property hll resided there for approximately 20 y.ars and at this time she was attempting to use her property II she see. fit for I lawful, valid, economic purpose that would not affect her neighbors property in any way, Mayor Pearson advised of the City's experience in the past with re- ference to liquor license being issued by the Stat. where they would be in close proximity to a school and further Isked what they suggested the property be used for. ,~ Revo Reid stated that homes like those of the Cinderella Subdivision could be built thereo Mr. Chandler stated that the property did not lend itself for subdivision, and that if the property was not used for some good purpose it could very well end up being used as another service station. Bob Wessler, owner of the Cinderella Realty Company, addressed the Council and stated he knew these people had purchased acre sites with 100 foot frontages 1809 -. , t City Hall, Anaheim, Californ!a..December 11, 1956 ~ 7100 P.Mo on Ball'~oad and' planned to make their homes there, but that progress cou~d not be stopped and that the section lines were destined to be primary 100 foot streets9 which would eliminate any future residences facing these main streetso Further, that in planning practically every instpnce where there is a primary intersection the area becomes a commercial developmento In this instance, he felt a shopping area here would be an advantage as the Cinderella builders have built approximately 500 homes, some that would come within 500 feet to 800 feet of this cornero He further advised that there was no definite time as to when these other shopping areas would begin construction and that the Bob's Market is proposed to be within a yearo He stated that there was a definite need for this type of development and this to be a logical locations Jeff Medaris, with reference to down grading of property, stated that the zoning in the past has shown that property immediately adjacent to commercial developments have increased tremendously in value, further, that a survey was made before requesting this Reclassification. The City Council felt that they would like to have more time to con- sider this matter and on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Wisser, continued the hearinq to D~cember 26, 1956, 7:00 o'clock P.M. MOTION CARRIED. TRACT NO. 2258 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Communication from Ho Ao Darby on behalf of the Fairfield Homes, loco was submitted and read, wherein they request an extension of one year be granted for the recording of Tract Noo 22580 On the recommendation of City Engineer, George E. Holyoke, Councilman Fry moved said extension of time for a period of one year be grantedo Councilman Wisser seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Coons left the meeting, 10:00 o'clock PoM. r-i COMPLETION OF PROJECT NOe 531 George Eo Holyoke, City Engineer, certified that the Sully-Miller Contracting Company had completed the improvement of South Olive Street from Santa Ana Street to Vermont Avenue, Project NOe 53, in accordance with plans and specificat10ns and recommended the work be officially acceptedo RESOLUTION NO. 3610: Councilman Wisser offered Res91ution No. 3610 and moved for its passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C~TY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING.THE COMPLETION AND THE RJRNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF SOUTH OLIVE STREET, FROM SANTA ANA STREET TO VERMONT AVENUE, PROJECT NO. 530 On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: A YES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMENi COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Fry, Schutte and Wisser~ Noneo Coons. The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted. r-, ASSIGNMENT OF INTEREST - SANTIAGO LATERAL CONNECTION, METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT: On motion by Councilman Fry, said assignment of interest was approved subject to the approval of the City Attorney as to the form of agreement to be made and entered intoo Councilman Wisser seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. WORK ORDER 2327: George Fo Oelkers, Director of Public Utilities, reported on informal quotations for the installation of power overhead distribution facilities on Placentia Avenue from Anaheim-Olive Road to South Street, Work Order Noo 2327, as follows: 1810 _City Hall. Anaheim, California, December 11,1956 - 7:00 PoM. E. D. Johnson Company Grimes Electric Schurr & Finley $ 2,213000 2,485000 2,486ctOO acceptedo Mr~ Oelkers recommended that the quotation of Eo D. Johnson Company be RESOLUTION NO. 3607: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 3607 and moved for its passage and adoption, subject to the approval by the City Attorney of the Agreement as to form and sufficiency~ Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING THE OFFER OF E. D. JOHNSON & COMPANY TO FURNISH ALL LABOR AND EQUIPMENT TO INSTALL PRIMARY ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES ALONG PLACENTIA AVENUE, FROM THE INTERSECTION OF PLACENTIA AVENUE AND THE WESTERLY EXTENSION OF SOUTH STREET NORTHERLY APPROXIMATELY 2,000 FEET, THENCE EAST 1,300 FEET, THENCE NORTH 400 FEET, WORK ORDER NO. 2327; AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT TO BE MADE AND ENTERED INTO WITH SAID E. D. JOHNSON & COMPANY. On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Fry, Schutte and Wisser. None. Coons. The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adoptedo RESOLUTION NO. 3609: Councilman Fry offered Resolution No. 3609 and moved for its passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE GRANTING OF AN EASEMENT TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES; AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF SAID GRANT OF EASEMENT. (Altec-Lansinq and City Fire Station NOG 3) On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly pass.ed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN; ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Fry, Schutte and Wisser. None. Coons. The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1109; Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance No. 1109 for first reading and moved for its passage and adoption. AN O~DINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING THE INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO VACATE AND ABANDON A PORTION OF AN ALLEY AND AN EASEMENT FOR ALLEY PURPOSES UPON, OVER, ACROSS AND ALONG THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY: FIXING A TIME AND PLACE FOR A HEARING THEREON: AND DIRECTING THE POSTING OF NOTICES THEREOF AND THE PUBLICATION OF THIS ORDINANCE. (Public hearing January 22, 1957, 7:00 PoMo) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance Noo 1109 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Fry moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived~ Councilman Schutte seconded the motiono MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. FINANCIAL AND OPERATING REPORTS: Financial and operating reports for the month of November, 1956 were ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Fry, seconded by Councilman Wissera MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 1107: Councilman Wisser offered Ordinance Noo 1107 for final reading and moved for its passage and adoptiono r i""'" i~ i j i 1811 Ci ty Hall, Anahelm\ Ca_li fornla. December III 1956.... 7100 P ctMo Refer to Resolution Book, page , r-\ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ARTICLE IX, CHAPTER 2 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THEREIN REGULATING THE USE OF LAND, HEIGHT OF BUIIDINGS AND YARD SPACES; ADOPTING A MAP SHOWING THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID ZONES; DEFINING THE TERMS USED THEREIN; PRO- VIDING FOR ADJUSTMENT, AMENDMENT AND ENFORCEMENT; PRESCRIBING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION AND REPEALING ALL SECTIONS OR PARTS OF SECTIONS IN CONFLICT THEREWITH& (F-56-57-l3 ~ C-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance Noo 1107 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Wisser moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waivedo Councilman Schutte seconded the motiono MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIEDo On roll call Ordinance Noo 1107 was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Fry, Schutte and Wissero None. Coonso The Mayor declared the foregoing Ordinance No~ 1107 duly passed and adoptedo ORDINANCE NO. 1110: Councilman Schutte offered Ordinance Noo 1110 for first reading and moved for its passage and adoptiono AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ARTICLE IX, CHAPTER 2 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THEREIN REGULATING THE USE OF LAND, HEIGHT OF BUILDINGS AND YARD SPACES; ADOPTING A MAP SHOWING THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID ZONES; DEFINING THE TERMS USED THEREIN; PRO- VIDING FOR ADJUSTMENT, AMENDMENT AND ENFORCEMENT; PRESCRIBING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION AND REPEALING ALL SECTIONS OR PARTS OF SECTIONS IN CONFLICT THEREWITH. (F-56-57-l7 - C-l and C-3) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance NoolllO and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Wisser moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waived. Councilman Fry seconded the motiono MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. _RESOLUTION NO. 3611& Councilman Schutte offered Resolution Noo 3611 and moved for its passage arid' adoptiono Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Richard E. DuffY) On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Fry, Schutte and Wissero Noneo CoonSQ r-- The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted" RESOLUTION NO& 3612: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No~ 3612 and moved for its passage-and adoptiono Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AOCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR 'ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Shell Oil Company) 1812 City Hall, ~naheim, California, December 11, ,1956 - 7&00 PoMo On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote~ A YES : NOES! ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUOCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Fry, Schutte and Wissero None 0 Coonso The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adoptedo r RESOLUTION NO. 3613: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution Noo 3613 and moved for its passage and adoptiono Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Lee Symonds) On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote~ AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUf'{;ILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Fry, Schutte and Wissero None. Coonso The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adoptedo RESOLUTION NO. 3614: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution NOe 3614 and moved for its passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CON- VEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSESo (Lee Symonds~ ~ On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: AYES~ NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Fry, Schutte and Wissero Noneo Coonso The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adoptedo RESOLUTION NO. 3615: Councilman Wisser offered Resolution Noo 3615 and moved for its passage and adoptiono Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A CONVEYANCE THEREOF; AND RESCINDING RESOLUTIONS NO. 3319, NO. 3434 AND NO. 35220 (Emil Mittman) On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: ~ AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNGILMEN~ Pearson, Fry, Schutte and Wissero Noneo Coonso The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adoptedo ASSIGNMENT OF RIGHTS = JOB NO~ 1070: Assignment of rights executed by Edwin Lo Barkley in the amount of $5,228032 to the Gladding-McBean Company was submitted ~d read. Said assignment of rights was accepted by the City Council subject to the rights of labor and material men to file notice to withhold in the time provided by law and further that it be paid after the expiration of that time, and in the event there are no withholding, and further acceptable only to the extent of the amount of money owing to the assignee, on motion by Councilman Fry, seconded by Councilman Wissero MOTION CARRIED~ 1813 City Hall, Anaheim. California, December 11, 1956 - 7:00 PoM. , ., . PURCHASE OF TRACTOR; The Administrative Officer reported on informal quotations received for the purchase of a tractor for the Public Works Department, as follows: McCoy Motor Company Orange County Tractor Sales Wallace Tractor Sales $ 3,314e84 (without power steering) $ 3,129093 (wi thout power steerirg ) $ 3,187.57 (including power steering) ri All quotations including sales taxo Mro Murdoch recommended the purchase of the tractor with the power steering from the Wallace Tractor Sales ($3,187057)0 Said purchase was authorized by the City Council on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Wissero MOTION CARRIED. CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Verified claim for damages submitted by Claude Go Henderson for injuries claimed to have arisen out of an accident which occurred-inrthe La Palma Stadium, November 2, 1956, for the amount of $10,000.00 was submitted and reade Said claim was denied by the City Council and ordered referred to the City's insurance carried on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Council- man Wissero MOTION CARRIED. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT; Notice of Public Hearing to be held Wednesday, December 19, 1956, in the City Council Chamber of the City of Santa Ana, City Hall, with reference to the improvement of the adopted route of the Santa Ana - San Diego Freeway was submitted and read. PLUMBER BONDS: Plumber Bonds submitted by Donald Lo Goode, dba D & L Plumbing Company, and Nat Taylor and Sons, Inc. were ordered received and filed when approved by the City Attorney, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Wissero MOTION CARRIED. r-, COMPLETION OF WORK ORDER No. 2308: George Fe Oelkers, Superintendent of Public Utilities, certified that the E. D. Johnson and Company had completed the in- stallation of pole line facilities on West Broadway and Dale Avenue, in accordance with plans and specifications, Work Order No. 2308, and recommended the work be official acceptedo RESOLUTION NO. 3616: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 3616 and moved for its passage and adoptiono Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY Ac:J:EPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE RJRNISHING OF ALL LABOR AND EQUIPMENT TO INSTALL PRIMARY ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES ON BROADWAY AND DALE AVENUE, WORK ORDER .NO. 23080 On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by the following vote: A YES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Fry, Schutte and Wissero None. Coonso The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adoptedo PERSONNEL: The Administrative Officer reported the employment of the following personnel: Mrso K. Irene Johnson, Police Department; James Truman Baker, Donald George Morse, Glen Robert Smith, Vernon Odell Deviney, and Sylvester Palbicki as Groundmen in the Light and Power Departm~nt; Ora Wendell Range, Maintenanceman Public Works Department; and Paul Jo Ryan, Administrative Departmento Said appointments were authorized by the City Council on motion by Councilman Wisser, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. COMMUNICATION, FINANCE DIRECTOR: Communication from the Finance Director, Beatrice Mo Miller, with reference to present accounting division and the future establishment of a system of internal control, was submitted and reado The City Council considered this to be a very good measure and one that should be pursued. 1814 City Hall, Anaheim, Californiat December 11, 1956 -- 7:00 PoMo ANNUAL REPORT ~ DIEHL, EVANS AND COMPANY: The report submitted by the Diehl, Evans and Company for the fiscal year ending July 30, 1956 was ordered received and fi~ d on motion by Councilman Fry, seconded by Councilman Schutte~ MOTION CARRIEDe APPOINTMENT, LIBRARY BOARD: Mayor Pearson reappointment Mro Edward Seekins member of the Library Board for the ensuing termo Said appointment was ratified by the City Council on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Wissero MOTION CARRIED. I~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. F-56~57~25: Submitted by John L~ McElroy, requesting M-l Zoning on the east 150 feet located at the southwest corner of Santa Ana and East Streetso Public Hearinq was ordered held on the matter January 8, 195U, 7:00 oVclock PoMo on motion by Councilman Wisser, seconded by Councilman Fry. MOTION CARRIED. RECLASSIFICATION NO. F-56~57-27: Submitted by Mrs~ Annie A. Bonkosky, requesting C-2 and C-3 Zoning on property described as the southeast corner of Euclid and Lincoln Avenueso Public Hearinq was ordered to be held on the matter January 8, 1957, 7:00 o'clock PClMo on motion by Councilman Fry, seconded by Councilman Wissero MOTION CARRIEDe VARIANCE NO. 668: Submitted by Harry Ao and Agnes B$ Keefer, reque~tihg permission to erect a three bedroom dwelling and garage on the front of property located at 428 South Ohio Streeto The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution Noo Ill, granted said Varianceo No actloh was taken by the City Councilo .......... ! i VARIANCE NO. 669: Submitted by Dro Robert Po Ralls, requesting permission to erect a service station on the corner and a professional building at the rea+ of the property located at the southwest corner of La Palma Avenue and \It/est Streeto The City 'Planning Commission, purs~aDt to their Resolution NO(J 112, granted Variance No. 669 for professional offices but denied the service station use on this pro~rtyCJ Communication was received from Dro Ralls with reference to the City Planning Commission's action and it was requested said communication be keptc-on record until the matter could be heard by the City Council. Council Wisser moved that ~ction taken by the City Planning Commission with reference to Variance Noo 669 be reviewed and that Public Hearinqbe ordered held on the matter becember 26, 1956, 7:00 o'clock PoM., Councilman Fry seconded the motiono MOTION CARRIED. VARIANCE NO. 670: Submitted by Dale 10 Sellon, requesting permission to erect a service station on property described as a triangular area where Center Street and the Anaheim-Olive Road merge west of Placentia Avenue. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution Noo 113, denied said Variance. ~ No action was taken by the City Council. VARIANCE NO. 671: Submitted by Dre Edward Ho Abrams, requesting permission to use the residence located at the southeast corner of Broadview Street and West Lincoln Avenue for a residence and medical officeo The City Planning CommIssion, pursuant to their Resolution Noo 114, granted said Variance, subject to the providing of three off~street parking spaces and suitable landscaping. A petition was filed protesting the granting of said Variance and on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Wisser, public hearinq was ordered to be held on the matter January 8, 1957, 7:00 oVclock P.Mo MOTION CARRIED. 1815 City Hall. Anaheim, ~alifornia1 December II, 1956 -, 7,;00 PoM. VARIANCE,NO. 67~: Submitted by Mrs. Evelyn Bonnat, requesting perm~ssion to use Lots 1, 2 and 3 of Tract 1178 for the erection of small modern retail stores, physician, dental, or other professional offices on property located at 1717-1731 East Center Streeto The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution Noo 115, denied said Varianceo r I No action was taken by the City Councilo VARIANCF NO. 074: Submitted by H. J. Belshe, requesting permission to erect an eight unit motel with living quarters, laundry and garage on property located on the east side of Stanton Avenue, 185 feet north of Ball Road. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution NOG 116, granted said Variance~ No action was taken by the City Council. REVIEW NO.6: Petition submitted by S & H Rubbish Hauling for Special Use Permit, requesting permission to store and/or bale corrugated cartons, store wooden crates and boxes, store empty bottles and large cans, miscellaneous metals and rags salvaged from the operation of trash collecting in the City of Anaheim, on property located at 306 East Santa Ana Streeto The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 117, granted said Special Use Permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. The erection of an 8 foot solid masonry wall entirely around the property on account of possible fire hazard and the hiding of the trash from view and also the blowing of same by wind. "...-- I 20 The providing of off-street parking on the property for all employees and customers. No action was taken by the City Councilo REVIEW NO.7! Petition for Special Use Permit submitted by the Central Baptist Church of Orange County, requesting pennission to erect a tent for temporary church services until actual construction of a permanent building is started at 301 North Magnolia Avenue, was submitted. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to their Resolution No. 118, granted said Special Use Permit for a period of 120 days. No action was taken by the City CouncilQ TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 3160. Submitted by E. Ao Farion, said tract is located on East Broadway, just west of the Southern Baptist Church (8 lots)o The City Planning Commission, at their regular meeting held December 3, 1956, apnroved said tentative map subject to the following conditions: lQ The payment of $25eOO per lot for the acquisition of Park and Recreation siteso 2. Engineering Requirementsp r-- I i Tentative Map of Tract Noo 3160 was approved by the City Council subject to the conditions as established by the City Planning Commission, on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Wisser. MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE MAP. TRACT NO. 2713: Submitted by George Buccola, said tract located on the west side of Valley Street just south of Niobe Avenue (10 lots)o The City Planning Commission, at their regular meeting held December 3, 1956, approved said tentative map subject to the following conditions: 10 The payment of $25000 per lot for the acquisition of Park and Recreation sitese 20 Engineering Requirementso 1816 City Hall, Anaheim, California, Decemb~r 11, 1956 - 7:00 PoMo Tentative Map of Tract Noo 2713 was approved by the City Council, subject to the conditions as established by the City Planning Commission, on motion by Councilman Wisser, seconded by Councilman Fry. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Wisser moved to adjourn to Thursday, December 13, 1956, 12:00 o'clock noon. Councilman Schutte seconded the motionQ MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED. ;f \ SIGNED: JL ~/: ~ City Clerk 'l City Hall. Anaheim, California, December 13, 1956 - 12:00 Noon The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in adjourned regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wissero ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None. CITY ATTORNEY: Preston Turner, Present. CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER: Keith A. Murdoch, Presento RESOLUTION NO. 3617: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 3617 and moved for its passage and adoption. Refer to Resolution Book, page A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI TY OF ANAHEIM ADOPTING BUDGET AND APPROVING MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT FOR EXPENDITURE OF GAS TAX ALLOCATION FOR MAJOR CITY STREETS. (1957 Allocations) ~ I On roll call the foregoing Resolution was duly passed and adopted by tm following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: COUNCILMEN: Pearson, Coons, Fry, Schutte and Wissero Noneo Noneo The Mayor declared the foregoing Resolution duly passed and adopted 0 ORDINANCE NO. 1111: Councilman Fry offered Ordinance No. 1111 for first reading and moved for its passage and adoptiono AN ORDINANCE OF THE CI1Y OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ARTICLE IX, CHAPTER 2 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF ZONES IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THEREIN REGULATING THE USE OF LAND, HEIGHT OF BUILDINGS AND YARD SPACES; ADOPTING A MAP SHOWING THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID ZONES; DEFINING THE TERMS USED THEREIN; PRO- VIDING FOR ADJUSTMENT, AMENDMENT AND ENFORCEMENT; PRESCRIBING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION AND REPEALING ALL SECTIONS OR PARTS OF SECTIONS IN CONFLICT THEREWITH. (F-56-57-9 - R~3 Zoning, Tract 2567) After hearing read in full the title of Ordinance Noo 1111 and having knowledge of the contents therein, Councilman Schutte moved the reading in full of said Ordinance be waivedo Councilman Fry seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ~ TAXI CAB STAND: Request of Yellow Cab Service of Anaheim for a taxi cab stand on the south side of Center Street, in front of the SQR Store, was submitted and read. Said request contained the approval of Mrs. Martha Ko Shumacher, owner of the property immediately adjacent to the requested siteo The City Council approved the location and the permit was granted for the taxi cab stand as requested, on motion by Councilman Coons, seconded by Councilman Fry. MOTION CARRIED.