1952/02/26
238
City HILl 1 .. lruOlneim. California.f 'ebruary .26~ 1952 - 8:00 P.M.
The City Council of the Cit7 of Anaheia .et in Regular Session.
PRESEIT: COtJRCILMKi; Pearson, Visser, Hering, BoneT and VanWagoner.
ABSENT: COUNCILMII: Mone.
CITY J.T'l'OIlIE!z.& "1110. !UII.IIl: Present.
ern JJIaIIS"l"KATrfI O,.,ICIlt, DITB J.. MtJRII)IHz Present.
(
HINUTIS: The Minutes of tbe Regular Meet4ng lIe1d February 13th and Adjourned B.esULar
Meetings held February 20th at 8:00 otcl~ P.M. and February 21st at 4:00 o'clock
P.M., 1952 were approTed on JIOt1on 'by Cotamllaan VanWagoner, seconded by' Couneil:u.n
Visser. MOTIOIl ~,1WtIP.
l'.IJUJnIJ: Councilaaa Van Wagoner reported demands against the, Oi ty "oUllting to
183,434.23. Councilaan Boney iIo-.:ed that report or Jinance Co.a.ittee be accepted
and that warrants be drawn upon the Trea..-er to pay said Demands in accordance
vi th report. Co\1DcUaan Wisser seconded the motion. MOTIOI CADIID..
PUBLIC HIlRIMG: ORDII.lHCE NO.?96: PubUc Hearing was held on request 8ultitted
b7 lv1keet Looks, IDc., (to abandon Kroeg.. street between last Banta Ana Street
aDd But Vater Street aDd the wester17 106 teet or the two alleys between Iroeger
and South Atchison Streets. All land adjacent to the right-et-wqs to be abandoned
would revert to Xviltset Locks, Inc. The areas to be abandoned are uniaproved and
COD~ no utili tie. other than a 6-inch sever line 4'ing along 175 teet of Kroeger
street south of Santa Ana street and one ot the alleys. In return lwikset proposes
to put in a 4D-:toot street trcBD last Santa J.na Street to the first alle7 to the south
and then continue Aid street southerly as r a 2O-toot alley until 1 t meets East.South
Street. '
,
Tests have been aade uaing th, largest truck and trailer combination and 1 t
has been eatabll&hed that the 4O-toot street would be adequate to serve any trucks
delivering to the Mutual Citrus Products plant or the Pacific Lighting COrpQrat1on.
- .
Action taken at the City Planning COIBliss1on .eeting February 18, 1952 was
to re~.nd to the C1 ty Council that Kroeger street between East Santa .Ana and East
Vater S1;r..t and the westerly 105 teet ot the two alleys, between South Atchison
Street and Kroeger Street, be abandoned 8I1d that the 4D-toot street between East_
Santa J.na street and the first alley to the south and the extension of this street
southerly as a 2O-foot alley to East Vater street, as proposed to be constructed
bJ ICwikset, be pemitted. A lo-toot strip will also be given forth. widening of
kst Santa Ana Street. The soning of the abandlmed Kroeger Striet will autOlll&tica1ly
be zones as M-l, Light Inducstrial Zone.
Ordinance No. '796, to.lth,r viti! AfftdaYit of its pubUcation and atfidarit
of posting of the pr.nses vas presented br the Clerk. Also presented was map showing
propoaed changea.
Mr. V.f. SII1t.h. Attorney representing the Mutual Citrus Produats Co.
spoke, relating their probl_s created Bhould the 81;reet be abandoned, and concl11d1ng
DGt.h1Dg under a 4fJ toot street. would be satisfacto17. He ~ded the Co\1llcU of the
law whereby' the COUDCUtS onl1' consideration in the abando:naent of the street would
be whether 1 t be in the interest of the public.
Mr. Taylor of the Mutual Citrus Products Co. spoke telling of fiture plans
of the plant and ot the proposed varehoWJe to be bull t on the propert7 irrNlftd..
His concern vas the traffic problem that vculd be created when the warehouse is COIl-
pleted.
Mr. Morris Jones, A.ttorney representing K1d.kset Locks Inc., spoke set.ting
forth the reasons for the request and what the Kwikset Locks Inc. proposed to do
in lieu of the street, he al.ao advised 'that "the pJ.an't van"ted to enJ.arge and locate
in this particular area due to the transfbraer location there. Th.~ were willing
~ ino:rease the 20 toot alle1 to ;0 foot, but anything lIlOre than that wuld we the
proposed new building too small as every root the alley is increased CG8leS ort the
new building.
Counc1l11an Heying aoved that the Hearing be continued until the next meeting
to enable a lION thorough study of the situation.
Mr. Jones advised that if the _tter was continued until then, Kwikset
lIight just as well vi thdraw their application as they have d.tin1 te cOlBi tments in
relation to defense operations that couldbtt be held up 8.D'11onger. .
Gouncilaaa Heying withdrew his _tion, and moved the Council recess. CouncU-
an BoDey seconded the _tion. MCTIOI CJJ$IED.
1 ,
239
City Hall. Anaheim. California. FebruarY 26. 1952 - 8:00 P.M. -
AFTER RECESS:
Councilaan Heying .oved to coatillue this Hearing Thursday, February 28,
1952 at 2:00 o'clock P.M. Councilman BcDney seconded the- motion. MOTION CllmIED.
(Notes taken at this Hearing on file with original application)
PUBLIC HEiRIBG: MONROE E. VlLLlCl lNBllTION: Pursuant to Resolution Ho. 1915,
Public Hearing was held on tlae proposed annexation to the city or the territorr
described in Resolution No. 1915.
No protests were rUed, and no one at the meeting protested against the
proposed annexation, thereupen the Mayor declared the Hearing closed.
GolDlcilman Heying introduced ORDINANCE NO. 798 which was read in publ~c
tor the first tiJlle.
AN ORDIlWfCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVIRG THE llNELlTION TO THE CITY OF .lRlHEIM
OF THK TERRITORY KNOWN AND _IGNiTED ~ lOGOB B. WlLLlCE - ANRIXlTIOH.
PUBLIC HElRING: Proposed chfmges to the Zoning Ordinance No. 774.
The following CitY' Planning GcmI1ssion's Resolutions were received
proposing changes to the ZoDLUag Ordinance No. 714:
No.9: That Kennels (7 or more adult dogs) DOW classified in Zoning Ordinance
774, as a use pe_tted in G-2, General Business Zone, be raoved
troll Section 11, 0-2, General Business Zone and be plaoed in Section 12,
M-l Light Manutac'turing Zone.
No. 10: 1. That Section 18, General provisions, paragraphflNOTlCES" be 81Iellded
to read as follows:
HOTIGi. All proposals for 8Ilending zone boundaries or classifications
of property uses 1d.thin such zones as are defined by this ordinance, or
the granting of variances as provided in Section 16 hereof, sha1l be
set for public hearing by the Secret&r7 of the Planning Co1mdseion for
hearings to be held before the Planning Commssion, and by the City
Council tor hMriDg5 before it, notice ot which shall be given in the
manner set forth 111 paragraphs 1,,2 hereof. The date of the first of the
hearings before tlle Planning CODBiss1on shall be not less than ten (10)
days nor more thai. forty (40) days from the time of filing or 'Such verified
application or the adoption of such resolution, or the malting or such
motion; provided, however, the Planning Coadssion need not hold more than
one (1) hearing for the purpose of considering the granting of a variance.
2. In the case of an amendment to zoning boundaries, classification or
reclassification of property uses, notice of such hearings shall be
published once in a newspaper of general circulationin the city not less
than ten (10) days prior to the date of the proposed hearings,' and such
notice shall set forth a description of the property under consideration,
the nature of the proposed change and the time and place at which a public
hearing or hearings on the matter will be held, and by mailing a notice
not less than ten tlO) days prior to the date of the first of such hearings
to the owners of property within the radius of three hundred (300) feet
of the exterior boundaries of the property to be changed using for this
purpose the last known name and address of such owners as shown upon the
assessment roll or th1. Cotmty. Such notice shall contain' the same in-
formation as is required :for published notices as above described.
.3. In the case of' an amendment to the text of this ordinance, notice of
hearings shall be published once in a newspaper of general circulation in
the 01 ty not less than ten days (10) days prior to the date ot the proposed
hearings, and such notice shall set forth the nature of the proposed change
and the time and place at which such hearings will be held on the matter.
4. In the case of an application for a variance, notice of the hearing on
such applieation shall be made by mailing anotice not less than ten (10)
days prior to the date of the hearing to the owners of property within a
radius of three hundred (.300) feet of the exterior boundaries of the
property tor whioh the variance is asked, using for this purpose the last
known name and address of such owners as shvwn upon the assesSIIent roll of
this County. Such notice shall set forth a description of the property
under consideration, the nature of the proposed change, and the time and
24D
City Hall. ll-.aheiDl. California. February 26. 1952 - 8:00 P.M.
place at which a public hearing. on the matter will be held, and, as prescribed
in Ordinance No. 774 of the Oitt of Anaheim, did duly hold and conduct
two publiC hearings, did recelvf evidence and reports from persons in-
terested ~herein. I J
No. 11: That Seotion 15; Paragraph C; ,. 8Ilended to read as tollows: ,
!,Cornices, eaves, belt cour5es,~." sills, buttresses and fireplaces may
extend or project into a requir " side yard not aore'than four (4)
inches tor each one foot or the. width ot such side yard and may extend
or project into a required tron~ or rear 7ard nor more than thirt)" (30)
inches.
~
PEBMISSIBLE OOVDi.GE OF RBQUIDr BUR YARD:
Canopies, open or closed, or ro fs connecting the aain building with the
accesso17 buildings, ra.ay extend. into the required rear yard; provided
that the horizontal area of anyone alone shall not exceed 25~ of the re-
quired rear 7ard, and t)1at the orizontal area ot aTJ.'7 two or -.ore in
combination, including accesso buildings, shall not exceed JIJ% of the
area ot the required rear yard.
Ho. 12: That Section 13-M-2 Heavy Manut~ctur1ng Paragraph A Use be 8Jlended to
read as follows: i
No. 13:
J.. USE: 1. Any use pendttedi the M-l Zone EXCEPT: , '
(e) Any residential use, prort ed that a dwelling shall be~ pem1tted
on the saae lot or parcel ot 1 ~ on which a tactory is located and such
dwelling shall be used exclus1". y. by a caretaker or superintendent of
such tacto17', and his taadl7. !
(b) Hospitals (except industrif1 .ergenoy hospitals.) ,
( c) Hotels
(d) Inst1tuti"ons of Haaes for treatment of Convalescent persons, children,
aged persona, alcolholic5, the l'ounded or the mentally infirm.
(e) Lodging Houses I
(t) Schools. .lA~
(g) Trailers, when used tor hr, habitation, trailer parks.
That Section 4: Section 1S, ptragraph C. Area, subparagraph L. Front
Yard, it.- a. General detail () Is hereby _ended to read as follows:
(1) Where lots on one side or' street between two intersecting streets
are developed with buildings ha ng a front 7ard that does not conform to
the front yard prescribed by t s ordinance by being greater or less than
the prescribed front yard tor t e zone in which such buildings are located,
the required front yard shall modified in the following manner, and no
building hereafter erected or s, ructura1ly altered shall project beyond
such modified required front 7atd line;
i
~
(a) For purposes ot this para ph, a nODoontormingtront yard shall be
deEllled to be an area as defined in this ordinance as const.ituting a front
yard except that the depth the r shall be determined b)" the front of the
existing main building on each ot having a nonconforming front yard, or
a point distant, ine1ther direc. ion trom the! rear line of the required
front yard and 8qua1 to 60% of t,he required depth of the front 7ard,
wbicheTer is the closest to thejrear line of the required front yard.
(b) 1'!1~ rear line of the mod1~" ~d required frrmt yard on each lot inter-
vening between nonconforming r,. nt yards or between a nonoonforming front
yard and a conforming front y , sha11 be established at a point on each
such intervening lot formed by ,he intersection ot the line establishing
the depth on each such lot and~. straight line drawn from the point of
intersection ot the rear line 0" one non-conforming front yard as Iltahlllbod:
in it_ (a) above and a point s. larly established on Ilhe occupied lot
at the other side of such inte ening lots.
Two public hearings by the Cityl Planning CoDrliss1on were held on the above
proposed changes.
No protests to the proposed Ch~geS we~e received by the City Council, and
the reCOJlDlend,ations of the City Planning Coamdssion as contained in their Resolutlons
Nos. 9, 10 and 11 were approved and the. ity Attorney instructed to prepare necessary
resolutions.
ORDIlUBCE NO. 797: Councilaan Heying o~ered Ordinance No. 797 and moved tor its
241
City Hall. Anaheim. California. February 26. 1952 - 8:00 P.M.
passage and adoption. Councilman Boney seconded the motion. MOTION ClBRIED.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY O~ANlHEIM AMENDING SECTION 3 OF ORDINANCE NO. 774 OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM ENTITLED !tAN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING ZONES IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
AND THEREIN REGULATING THE USE OF LAND, HEIc;tHT OF BUILDINGS AND YARD SPACES: ADOPT-
ING A MAP SHOWING THE BOUNDARIES OF SAID ZONES: DEFINING THE TERMS USED IN THIS
ORDINANCE: PROVIDING FOR ITS ADJUSTMENT, AMENIMENT AND ENFORCEMENT: PRESCRIBING
PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION AND RBPEALING OIlDINANCES OR PORTIONS OF ORDINANCES IN CON-
FLICT THEREWITH", BY CHANGING THE BOUNIWUES er ZONES R-l, 0-2 AND M-l.
OOG LElSH LAW: Petition containing 204 signatures was sulmitted by the City Clerk
to the Co\Ulcil of persons opDQsing the tentative dog leash:'~law.
. The Council discussed some of the provisions ot the propo~ed ,Ordinance,
and are working on an ordinanoe for presentation at a later date.
ELECTION: The City Clerk presented a list ot Election Officers and Polling Places
tor the consideration of the Oity Council; election to be held April 8, 1952.
Councilman Van Vagqner moved the listed Election Officers and designated
Polling places be accepted. Councilman Boney seconded the motion. MOTION ClRRIED.
PLANNING COMMISSION APPOIN'IMIlfTS: Mayor Pearson re-appointed E. P. Hapgood and
J. E. Schlaacher as members on the C1 tyPlann1ng Commission for the three-year
term ending January 31, 1955.
Councilman Heying !loved the foregoing apJX>intments be ratified. Council-
man Wisser seconded the motion. MOTION ClRRIED.
PLAGENTIl AVENUE .lNNEX.lTION: On motion by" Councilman Heying, seconded by COlDlcilman
'Wisser, the City ,Attorney was instructed to prepare a R$solution to be nmbered 1929
gi~ng consent to the proponents to comaence and conduct proceedings tor the annex-
ation to the City of Anaheim of the tertitory designated as Placentia Avenue Annexa-
tion,f MOTION CJRRIED. . ,
CITY PLANNING COMMISSIONRESQLUTION NO. 17 - Application of C. A. Ziaermann
No. F-51-52-6.
At the City Planning CoJaission Meeting held February 18, 1'J52 the above
Resolution No. 17 was adopted wherein tlley JIOYed to recommend to the City Council
that application No. F-;1-52-6 be deD1ecl..
Facts determined as result of investigation and Public Hearings were:
1. This property is next to an R-l, Single F8Dli.lyRee1aential Zone.
2. The majority or the property owers in this R-l, Single Faai11 -Residential Zone
protested the intrusion ot general commercial business so close to their haaes.
3. That tl:1e Pl~ng Commission allowed this subdivision to be built on South Los
An&~les Street not too long ago.
4. That a C-2, General Commercial Zone might devaluate Single F8mily Residential
values.
5. That, it changed to a 0-2, General Commercial Zone, any business allowed in
this zone could be located on this property.
6. That the property in question 1s now zoned as R-J, Multiple Family Residential
Zone, of which there is a great scarcity in the City.
Councilman Heying 1IlOved the Council accept the recomm.endations ot the City
Planning Commission and sustain their aatlons. Councilman Boney seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
The Mayor replied to the article presented by the Administrative Officer
on the purchase of the County of Orange of a Fire Truck and equipaent tor the unin-
corporated territory ot Stanton; a ~tter that should be taken up with the League
of' California Cities to see i.f this sort of expenditure ot General Fund Monies,
raised largely in cities cannot be dispensed with.
On motion by CouncilJllan Heying, seconded by Councilman Boney, the City
Attorne7 was instructed to prepare Resolution to be nlDbered 1928 providing for the
sale ot city property to the County of Orange for a Municipal Court Site. MOTION
CARRIED.
On motion br Councilaan Boney, seconded by Councilman Heying, that the
City Attorney proceed with arrangElllents tor the purchase ot the Rust property at
the stated price ot 13,100.00. MO'1I>lf CARRIED.
COWlcilman Boney- lIOYed to adjourn to Tlmrsday, February 28, 1952 at 2:00
o'clock: P.M. Councilman Heying seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOlJRKED.
SIGNED ~4~'~/~5L -..
Clerk
1 I