PC 78-112RESOLUTION N0. PC78-112
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIH CITY PLANNING COMHISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT N0. 1837 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Lortmission did receive a verified
Petition for Conditional Use Permit from DALE E. AND SARAH ANN F0~lLER~ 3178 East La
Patma Ave~ue. Anahelm. California, 92606, owners, and CREVIER INPORTS, i061 "H"
Shepard Street. Anahein, Californla 92806. agent, of certain real propcrty situated
in the City of Anaheim, Courtty of Orange, State of Latifornla, described as:
That portion of Lot 20 in Block K of the Kraemer Tract, as shown
on a Map recorded in Boolc 12, page 87 and 88 of MTscellaneous
Records of Los Angeles Coun[y, California~ described as follows:
Parcel No. 2. as shown on a Map filed in Book 55~ page 47 of
Parcel Maps in the office of the Coun[y Recorder of Orange Gounty,
California.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commissfon dId h
Ha11 in the Lity of Anaheim on May 22, 1978, at 1:30
hearing having been duly given as requtred by
provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chaptcr
evTdence for and against said proposed conditional
findings and recommendations (n connectton therewlth;
old a public hearing at the CiCy
p.m., notlce of said public
law and in accordance with the
~8.03, to hear and consider
use and to investigate and make
and
wHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, tnvestigation and study made
by itseif and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reparts
offe~ed at said hcarTng. does find and determine the followtng faccs:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a condittonal use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipa! Code Section 18.61.050,070 to wit: to
permit an autornobtle repair and restoration facility.
2. That the proposed use Is hereby granted for a trro-year period. subject
to review and consideration for an extenston of time to determine whether the use has
had a detrimental effect o~ the surrounding industrlal area.
3. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoTni~g land uses
a~d the grow[h and development of the area In which it is proposed to be located.
~. That the size and shape of the site proposed for tha use is adequate to
a11ow the full developme~t of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the
particu)ar area nor to the peace, health, safety~ and general welfare of the Citizens
of the Ctty of Anaheim.
5. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permlt under the conditions
tmposed~ if any, will not be detrimental to the peace~ health, safety and general
welfare of the Cittzens of the Ctty of Anaheim.
6. That no one indtcated their presence at sald public hearing Tn
opposition; and that no correspondence was receTved in opposltion to the subJect
pctition,
PC78~112
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: The Planning Director or his authorized
representat ve has eterm ned that the proposed proJect falls w(thtn the deftnition
of Categorical Exemptions, Class 1, as defined in Paragraph 2 of the Ctty of Anaheim
Environmental Impact Report Guidelines and is. therefore. categorically exempt fran
the requirement to prepare an EIR.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE iT RESOLVED that the Anaheim CTty Planning Commission
does hereby grant subJect Petitlon for Condltional Use Permit. upon the following
condttions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequlsite to the proposed use
of the subJect property in order to preserve the safe[y and general welfare of the
Citlzens of the City of Anahefm:
i. That sidewalks shall be installed along La Palma Avenue and Shepard
Street as requlred by the Ctty EngTneer and in accordance with standard plans and
speciflcations on file ln the Office of the City Englneer.
2. That subJect property shail be developed substantially i~ accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the Lity of Anaheim marked Exhibi[ Nos. 1
through 3.
3, That Condition Nos. 1 and 2, above-mentioned, shall be complted with
prlor to final building and zontng Inspections.
4, That the proposed use is yranted for a two-year period~ subJect to
review and consideratton for an extension of time, upon writted request by the
petitioner, to determine whether the use has had a Jetrimenial effect on the
surrounding indusLria) area.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEO that the Anaheim CTty Planning CamTsslon does hereby
find and determine that adoptlon of this Resolutton ts expressly predicated upon
appllcant~s compliance Htth each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth.
Should any such condition~ or any part thereof, be declared invaild or unenforceable
by the final Judgment of any court of competent jurisdictio~, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and votd.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this 22nd day of May,
~978.
,~~~~:~~~ ~~.~
CHAi N, ANAHEIN CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~ /f - /6C~f AiL= ~
SECRETARY. ANAHEIM CITY PIANNiNG COMMiS510N
-2- PC78-112
'-_ ~
57ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris~ SecPetary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hcreby certify [hat the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anahetm City Planning Cammtsslon held on May 22. 1978, at 1:30 p.m., by the
following vote of [he members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: DAVID~ HERBST, JOHNSON, KING~ LINN, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BARNES
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 1 have hereunto set my hand this 22nd day of May~ 1978•
SECRETARY~ ANA~ CITY PLANNIN~ISSION
_3_ PC78-tt2