PC 78-209RESOLUTION N0. PC78-20?
A RESOLUT I OtJ OF TfiE ANAHE I`i C I TY PLANN I NG COt1h1 I SS ! OPI
THAT P!'TITION FOR RECLASSIFICATIOtJ N0. 77-78-h6 BE GRAPITED.
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Clty Planning Cortunission did receive a verified
petition for Reclassification from CARL L. A~iD MIIDRED E. RAU AtlD CLASSIC DEVELOPMENT
LORP,, 12700 iCnott Avenue, Suite "R", Garden Grove, California 91.641, owners, and
SHALLER 6 LOHR ASSOCIATES, INC., 366 San Higuel Drive, Newporc Beach, California
92660, agent, of certain real property situated in the Lity ofi Anaheim, Lounty of
Orange, State of California, described as follows:
A portion of Lots 25 and 26 of Tract No. 117, Amended Hap of Vista
Del Rio Rancho recorded in BooF: ii, Page 15 of Miscellaneous Maps,
records of Orange County, California and Lot "A" Tract No. 7732
recorded in Map Book 361, Pages 16 through 19, records of Orange
County, Californta, described as follows: Beginnina at the most
westerly corner of Lot "A" per tract No. 773z recorded in Map Book
361, pages 15 through 1~. of said Orange County; thence North 60~
33' 42" East 460.49 feet along the southeasterly line of the
California State Highoiay Righ[-of-way, descrfbed in Deed to the
State of Californl~ recorded September 6, 195;, in Book 2227, Page
96 of Official Records; thence South 89° Oi' 14" Eas[, 22.55 fee[;
thence South 00° 48' Sd" East 45.00 fee[; thence North 89° O1' 14"
West 60.00 feet; thence South 00° 48' S8" East 17.1.~~ feet; thence
South 89° O1' 14" East 60.00 feet thence South 00° ~+E3' S8" East
107.5~+ feet to a point on the northerty line o` thc Santa Ana
Valley Irrigation Company's Canal and [he southerly line of Lot 25
as shown on said Tract ~Jo. 117; Thence North 6Q° 33` ~Z" East
along said San:a Ana Vallcy Irrigation Canpany Canal 101.5n feet
to a point in the southwesterly Right-of-Way li~e of Parcei 4
(Re1-321) of the Higho+ay Righ[-of-llay relinquished to thc County
of Oran9e by Resolution by the California Highway Carenission, a
certified copy of said Resolutian is recorded in Boot; 9~A3. Page
G23 of said official records and as shown on Map recorded in Book
B, Page 17 of 5[ate Highway Maps in said office; thence Souch 52°
32' 30" East 19.71 Feet; thence cantinuing along said P,ight-of-lJay
line the following courses, South 37° Z7' 30" West 5`~7.69 feet to
the beginning of a curve concave southeasterly having a radius of
3~50.00 feet; thence southwesterly alona sald curve through a
cer.tral angle of 04° 25' 46" an arc distance of 235.7° feet;
thence continuina along said Right-of-Nay ~Iorth F2° ii' 4f" West
54.29 feet to a point on [he northeasterly boundary of Tract Ho.
7733. recorded in Map Book 374, Pages 12-15 of sald Orange County;
thence along said tract boundary through the following courses,
North 10° 13' 16" East 151.17 feet, North 00° 57' 25" East 80.14
fee.t, North ~2° 14' 38" Nest 64.20 feet, North 15° 44' 26" West
92.49 feet to a poinc in the southeasterly boundary of Tract No.
7732 as recorded in a Map Book 361, Page 16-19 of said Oranae
County; thence atong said tract boundary through the following
courses, Nor[h t5°44' 26" West 61.74 feet, North 6Q° 38~ 00" East
95.95 feet, North 00° 57' 25" East 7~i.14 feet to a point on the
northwesterly Rtght-of-lJay line of Camino Tampico as shown on satd
Tract No. 7732: thencc along said Right-of-Way South 60~ 38' 00"
PC78-209
Nest 1.26 feet, to the most Sou[herly corncr of said Lot "A";
thence North 29°22' 00" West 119.5a feet along the southwesterly
line of sald Lot "A" to the potnt of beginning,
WFIERtAS~ the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Clty
Hall in the City of Anaheim on Jtily 31, 1°78, at 1:30 p.m „ nocice of satd publfc
hearing hav(ng been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the
provisions of the Anaheim Municlpal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investtgate and make
findings and recommendatlons in co~nection therewith; said public hearfng having been
continued to the Planning Commision meeting of September 11, 1978; and
WHEREAS, said Comnissfon, after due inspection, investtgation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at sald hcaring, docs find and de[ermine the followfng facts:
1. That the petitfoner proposes reclassification of subJect uroperty from
the RS-A-43,000(SC) (P,esidential/Agricultural-5centc Corridor Overlay) and Lounty A-1
(General Agricultural Olstrict) Zones to the RS-72Q0(SC) (Residential, Single-Family-
5cenfc Corridor Overlay) 2one.
2, That the Anaheim General Plan designaLes subject property for low
densi:y residential land uses.
3. The Anaheim Ct[y Planning Commisslon approved Resolution No. PC78-~0 on
May 8, 1978, granting Reclassification t~o. 77-7°-4b; ho~,rever, the matter was appealed
to the City Council and after a public hearing, the City Councll reverted subJect
proposai bacl: to the Planning Commission for additional review.
4. That the reclassification is hereby granted sub)ect to the petitioner's
stipuiation to provide adequate on-site turn-around area for Lots 12 through 15 as
approved by the City Traffic Engineer.
5. Thai the proposed reclassification of subJect property is necessary
and/or desirable for the nrderly and nroper development of the cormmunity.
6. That the proposed reclassificatlon of subject property Joes properly
relate to the zones and their {~errni[:ed uses iocaily estabiisha:<i in close proximity
to subject property and to the zones and thefr permttted uses generally established
throughout the community.
7. That the proposed reclassiflcation of subJect property requires the
dedication and improvement of abutting streets in accordance with the Circulatton
Element of the General Plan, due to the anttcipated increase in traffic which will be
generated by the intensfftca[lon of land use.
8. That 8 persons indtcated thefr presence at satd public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was received ln opposltion to the subJect
petition.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FINDING: That the Anahelm Clty Planning Canmission has
reviewed the proposal to rec assify [he propcrty from the RS-A-43~000(SC)
(Restdential/Agricultural-Scenic CorrPdor Overlay) and Cou~ty A-i (General
Agricultural Dis[rict) 2ones to the RS-7200(SC) (Residentlal, Single-Family-Scenic
Corridor Overlay) Zone to establish a 15-1ot RS-720Q(SC) subdtvision wlth waivers of
-2- PC78-209
minimum lot width and frontage and requirement tha[ single-family structures rear on
arterial highways on an irregularly-shaped par•cel of land consisting of approximately
5,2 acres, having a fron[age of approximately 63u feet on the northwes[ side of Santa
A~a Canyon Road, having a maximum depth of approximately 440 feet, and being located
approx(mately 1800 feet northeast of the centerltne of Mohler Drive; and does hereby
approve the Negative Geclaration from the requirement to prepare an environmental
impact report o~ the basis that there would be no si9nificant individual or
cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative
Declaration since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subJect property for low-
density residential land uses commensurate with [he proposal; that no sensittve
environmen[al impacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study submf[ted
by the petitloner ir~dicates no signiffcant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental lmpacts; and [hat the Negative Declaration substantiaifng the foregoing
findings is on flie fn the Cfty of Anaheim Planning Deoartment.
NOW, THEREFORE. SE IT RESOLVED that [he Anaheim City Planning Carmission
does hereby grant subJect Petition for Reclassification and, by so doing. that Tltle
18-Zoning of the Anaheim Nunicipal Code be amended to exclude the above-described
property from the R5-A-43,000(5C) (RESIDENTIAL/AGRICULTURAL-5CEP7iC CORP,IDOP, OVERLAY)
and COJNTY A-1 (GENERAL AGRICULTUR~L D15TP.ICT) ZONES and to incorporate satd
described property into the RS-7700(SC) (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY-SCEFlIC CORRIDOR
OVERLAY) ZONE upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary
prerequistte to thc proposed use of subJect property in order to preserve the safe[y
and general welfare of the C1Cizens of the City of Anaheim:
i. That fire hydran[s shall be installed anci charged as required and
determined to be necessary hy the Chief of ihe Fire Department prfor to cortmencement
of structural framing.
2. That subject property shall bc served by underground utilitles.
3• That [he owner of subJect property shall pay to the City of Anaheim [he
appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as detcrmined to bc appropriate by thc
City Council, said fees to be paid at the tlme the bullding permit 15 issued.
4. That prior to the introduc[ton of an ordinan<:e a final tract map of
subJect property shatl he submitted to and approved by the Citv Council and then he
recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder.
5. That these reclassification proceedTngs are granted subJect to
completion of annexation of subJect property :~ the City of Anaheim.
6. Tha[ all structures conscructed or. subject property shall canply with
the requirements of the City of Anaheim Fire Zone No. 4, as approved by the Fire
Depar[ment.
7. That the developer(s) remove the two tllegal tract signs located on the
block wall (facing North) on the south side of the Riverside Freeway in Tract Nos.
7730 and 7736.
8. 7ha[ the vehicular access rtghts. except at approved access points. to
Sa~[a Ana Canyon Road shall be ~ed(cated to the Cicy of Anaheim.
-3- PC78-209
9. That the developers of subJect property shall provlde a~ adequatc an-
site vehtcular turn-around area for lot Nos. 12 through 15, as approved by the City
Traffic Engineer.
10, That the developers of subJect property shall pay the [raffic signal
assessment fee (Counctl Policy No. 214) amounting to $36.00 per each new dwelling
unlt prior to the issuance of a buiiding permit.
it. Prior to the tntroduction of an ordtnance rezontng subJect property,
Condi[ton t~os. 4, 5, 7 and 8, above-mentioned, shall be completed. The provlstons or
rights 9ranted by this r•esolution shall become null and void by action of the
Planning Commission unless sald conditfons are complted with within one year from the
date hereof, or such further timc as th~ Planning Commission may grant.
12. That Condition Nos. 2, 6 and 9, above mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to final buiiding and zoning inspections.
BE IT FURTNER RESOLVED that the Anaheim Ci[y Planning Lommisston does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resoiu[ton ts expressiy predicated upon
applicant's compiiance with each and all of the conditfons heretnabove set forth.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared i~valid or unenforceable
by the final judgment of any court of competent Jurisdlction, then thfs Resolutlon,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOP,EGOItaG RESOLUTION ts signed and approved by me ihis llth day of
September, 1978,
CH RMAN, AN, . C Y LANh11NG COMMISSION
ATTEST:
~~ .~° `.~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLAN~~ING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUt7TY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIH )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commissfon, do
herehy certify that the foregoing resolu[ton was passed and adopted at a meeting of
the Anaheim City Planning Comr~ission hcld on September it. 1q78, at 1:30 p.m „ by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: E3ARNE5, DAVID, HERBST. KING, TOLAR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COHMISSi0NER5: JOHNSON
VACANY: OtIE SEAT
IPJ WITNE55 WHEREOF~ I have hereunto set my hand thls lith day af September.
1978.
~d.l.GL' ~j~qitn,.i.a~
SEC4E ARY~ ANAHEIM CI Y PLANNING COMMISSION
-4- PC78-2o9