PC 87-47-'~`.
RE£iOLUTION N0. AC8'i-••Y7
WH~REAa, th~ Anaheim r,ity Planninq Commissioa did r.eceive a verifi.E~d
F~etition for Variance irom RICK.L L VAR3LG AND 5[i~RRX L. VARRL~, 375 ~'ia
Montaner.a, Anahc~im, Califocnia 9'~807, owners of certain real. propecty situal•e~9
in the City ~~ Anaheim, County of Orange, Skate of Californ.ta describ~d as:
A RESOGU'PION Or TH~ ANAHEIM G2T't PLANNING COMMISSTON
THA'?' PETiTION EOK VARIANCE t~Co 3637 li~ GRANT.ED
LOT 19 UI' TRACT N0. 9217, AS PGl~. MAP RECOI2DGD IN BOOK 395, PAGES
5'.~0 B INCLUSIVE OF ~IISCBLLANEOUS Mr1PS, IN THE 0"r"FICE OF.' THF
COUNTY RF.COF.DER OF SATll COUNTY.
s~
P~HFR~AS, the GiL-y Planning Commission did hold a publ:i.c hearing a~
the Civic Center in the Ci.ty of Anahtim on Feoruary 1B, 1987, at 1:30 p.m.r
notice of said public hearing having been duly given a~ required by law and in
acc~rdance with thn provisions o~ L•he Ariaheim Muniripa.l C~de, Chapter ].~3.03,
i:o hear and considPr evidenee fnr and against sai.d proposed v?riance and to
irivestigate and make Pindi.ngC and r~~c:ommendations in connectic~:~ therewil-.h; and
WIiFFtEASr said Con~missior~, after due inspecti~n, inv~stigaki.on and
s~urly ma~e by iL-selt and ir~ its behalP, and after. ;aue consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said l~ea!:ing, dces find an~~ d~~ermine the
Followiny Pacts:
1. Th~t che pet.itioner propose~ wazvers of the: following Eo
constr.~tiaL• a room addit:~.on ti7 an existing :,ingle-tamily residencer
SGC'~ION 1~.23.U53.020 - Minimum sid~~~ard.
(10-feet reqtiiT:ed; 6.5 feeL• proposed)
2. Th~it tY~e above•-menL•ioned waiver is herek~y yranted on ~he b~sia
that un the hasis that there are Upecial circumstar,ces appli:.aU1e t~ the
proper~y such ~; s.ize, ~hape, to~ogrci~hy, loc~ation and surruundings which do
not apply to ather identically zoned pcope.rt.~ ~n tt~~ same vici.nity; a~~~] ~hat
strict ap~lication oL- the 'Loning Code deprivE~ the ~ropQrty ot pr3.vilege~
enj~yed by other. propertips in the ident:ical zone ar~d cla:siEicatian :in the
vicinity.
ni:- '.S
~`;:,
•~YR ~
~
r.;, 3. `Pli~at. rher.~ are ~xc~ptional or Extraordinary ci~cumstances c,r
condiL•ions ~pplicable t~~ thc proptrty involv~d or to the inte:~ded use ot l:he
~roper.ty l-t~at do na* apply 9enerally to Lhe prop~rty or cl~~ss o~ use i.n thP
j'~ same vicinity anc~ zone.
r„`:
';
,~`.i
,~;~: j
~~,~!:,C
9, That tY,e requ~sL•ed vari~nct~ is nAcess~ry Cor the pceservation and
enjoymerit o.f a substantial property right C~ossessed by other property in the
sarne vic:in~ity an~3 zone, an~7 denied L-o the prunert1r in question.
5. That ttie requested variance wi11 not he matecially ~lekrimental to
the public: welf.are or injurious to tt~e properF,y ar i.mprovemen~s in suci~
vi.cinity and zone ici which the propr ety is loca~ed.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in
opposition; and that no correspondence was cec~ived in op~asition tu subject
petition.
t058r
PC87-47
`,
%i
~ ~_ a~~
,~,
~ i
~
~ ~ i ~4~
.?;
i:;~
,~t
~NVTRONh1ENTAi~ IMPACT FINDING: The Planning Dzrector. nr his
authorizeci representa~:ive nas dstermined that the proposed project falls
within the definitiun oE Categorical E:xem~~+:ions, C].ass S, as detined in the
State f~TR Guidelines and is, therefote, categorically exempt £roir Lhe
requirement to prepare an EIR.
NOLV, ~'HER~rbRE, AE IT RFSOLVED that the Anahei.m City Planning
Commission does her.zby granl• subject Petition Por Variance, upon the fol lowing
eonditions which are hereby found to be a n^cessary prerequisite t o l•he
proposed use of the subject proper.ty in order to preserve ~he safe ty and ,'f;
genera.l wc~lfare of the Citizens oE che City oP Anaheim:
''i;
1. That pr.ior ro issuun~e of a building permit~ ~he appropriate rnajor
thorouyhfare and bri.dc;e fee shall bc paicl 'to the City of AnaYiEim in
an amount a~ spe~i;~ied in the Major Tt~orouqhPare and Bridge ['ee
Pr.oyram f~r the E'oothill/Lastern Transport~~t~c~i~ Corridor, as apnroved
by City Council Resulution No. ~5It-423.
2. Tha~ suhject property sha11 be develo~ed substani:ially in accordance
witn plans and specifications on file with the Cit,y of Anaheim marked
EYt~ibit Nos. .l, '?, and 3.
3. Tr~at pri~r L•o final buildir.g and c~ning inspections, Condi.tion No. 2,
above-menkioned, shall be complied svith.
BE IT L~UR.THER RESOLVBll lhat th~ Anaheim City ~.lanning Commission do~s
her~by ~ind and determine thai: adoption o~ this Resol,uti~~n is expresal.y
predicated upon applicant's compliance with ea~h a~icl all of the cond itions
hereinabove set Porth. Should ~ny such condition, or any part there o f, be
declar~d invalid or unenforcNable by tt~e final judgment af. any co u rt of
competent juriscliction, the;~ khis Resoiutio~.; and uny approvals herein
contained, sh~.ll he deemed null arid void.
~'FiE FOREGOiNG t?ESOLUTION is signed and approved by me this i8tr day
of February, 1967. ~
...(i:7 ~ - "yr .
'l;, ~~.
~ , .. ~~...
CEIAIRMAN, AN F.IM CITY PL TNG CC)MMISSION
1~'PTE ~T: ~
SECRETAR., ANAHGIM CI'PY PLANNING COMMISS.l'ON
~~1,;,
;; t
"2' PC87-47
,~,,
~~.v~,,.:~r..:::
r^~.
S'i'ATE OF C~LIFO'_~NIA )
COUNTY or ORANGE ) ss.
CITY 0[' ANAHEIM )
/n`~'~~
~
rt
t, EdiL•h L. Harris, Secret.azy of the Anaheim City Planning J
Commission, do h~reby certify that the Eoregoii~.g r~solution was passed and ,:~,,.~
adapi:ed at a meetir-G o.f the Anaheim City Pl~.nning Commission held on February ';'~;i,;
18, 1987, by the Following vote af the me;noers tnereof:
AXES- C4MMISSIONE~RS: E30UAS, PRY, HCP.B~T, LA CLA:IREE, LA~JICi.I, MC SURNEY, I~~~
MESSE ~~I
~
NOES: GC~Mh]ISSIONERS: PlOidE i',.
AT35ENT: COMMISSTONERS: NprXE '''''
,..¢~
,; ;,
iN WITDiFSS WHEREGI', I have hereunko se'~ my hand this 18th day of °<
Fpbruary, 1987. ,,~
~;
' '-'Ja~,~ /! s • ";
SEChETARY, ANAHEIM CITY FLANNING COMMISSIQN >,~
,
i
~
~'
~,
~.~~:
;, .
~~~.:~ ~~ ~ ~
~~;~~~~`~{~~~~~~'~'~ ~~ ~ ~ ~
~A'4, ~M:OF4blIM
-3-