Resolution-PC 89-14~
~
~`~~
~1,
~~
EtE~QL,3,TT.I~T_N0. P~89-~.4
A RE50LUTT02~ OF TF{E ANAHFIM,CITY PLANNIIZG COtdMIS~~:ON
THAT PFTiTION F~)R R~CLASSiF~TrAT.iON N0. 88-89-~0 BE GRAT1~Ti:D
r~tii~l <7~j;~~
y y k~''{~
WHEREAS, S_he Anaheim City Plannin7 Commission did roaalve a
vex•ified petitinn for Rec:lassificatioxi From MR. JIANN S. WEI, 845 Sou~.h Beach
Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92009, owner~ and LU ARCHITECT~ AND ASSOCIATES, 8862
Garden Grove Boulevard, ,3uite 101, Garden Grove, CA 92594, agent for certain
real proy~erty situated in the City of Anahe~m, County o£ Orango, State o£
California, de3cribed as Eol].ows:
1HE NORTH 105 FEET OF THE SOUTH 729 FEET OF THF EA.ST
ONE-HALF OI~' THE EAST ONE-HALF TO TTiE SOUTHE:~S'7'
QUAR7:ER OF THE SOUTHF.AST QUARTEF AtID ~HE NQRTFI I05
FEFT OF' TH~ SOUTH 729 FEET OF 'SHE E;AST 8 FEET Or THE
WEST OtdE-HALF OC SFCTION 14, IN TOiV~I5FiIP 4 SOUTfi
Rl~NGE 11 WEST, IN TEiE RANC~TO LOS COYQTES, IN THE CI"rY
OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORILNGE, STATE OE CALIFOFNIA, Au
PER MA~' RECORDED IN B04K 51, PAGE 7 ANll FO~,I.UWING,
MISCEL~LANEOUS MA~'S YN THF. OFFICE GF TFIE i:OUNTY
RECORI~ER OF SAIA COUNTI'.
WHEREAS, thQ City Plarining Commission did hold a public hQaring
mt thQ Civic Center in tho ~"'~ty af Anaheim on January 16, 1989, at 1:30 p.m.~
nfltic:o of said publie hearing h~vinq been duly givc~n as required b~ law and in
accordance with khF; ~rovisiong of the Anaheim Munici~al Code, Chapter 1.8.03,
to hear and cansider evidence .for and against said proposed rec'lassificatiun
and to investigate and make findings t~nd re~commenda~i.ons isi cunnection
therewith; and
WHERrA;;, sFid Conuni~szon, aftea~ 8uQ in~pection, inves~iqatiUn
and study made by itseii ar.c~ in iL•s behalf, and aftor due consideration of a11
evidQnce and re~por~~ o£f~r.ecl at said haariiig, does fincl and detQrmine the
fnllowing facts:
1. Thr,t ~:he patitior-ar proposes reclassi£ication of ~ubject
property from 22S-A-~13,Q00 (Re~idential/i~gr~cu7.tural) Zone to the CL
(Commercir~l, Lamited) ~~r a less intense zone.
2. That the Anaheim General ~lan deaignates subjec:t property
for General Commercial land ~a~es.
3. That, thc~ prc~oosed reclassiEication oE ~ubjec~ property is
necesa».ry and/or desir.able for L-he or.d~rly and proper de~~elapmc,nL• of the
community.
4. Th~t the proposecl rerlas~ificatior. af subjact property does
properly relat4 to i:he zone:: and thear permittad ~~ses loc:ally es'tablished in
close proximity t~ sur,:ier,t property and ro tY:e xone~ and thexr pc~rmitted uses
generally establis2~.ed throughour_ the commun.ity.
_ , ~,; ; ~ ~ ~,,:,
}'?! Y2l~,F~'~~~~
,i~•~, ~' ''''
~, . ri nr~ . ~,?i~.
~ ~ ~~;i~ ~;
. ,1}:
~
, ,~
5. Tht~t the propased r~classificata.on oE aubject prop~~~y J
requires the dedication of abutting S~reets in accordance wiCh the Circulal;ion '
;lement of Y.ha General P1an, tlue to the anticipated increase in traff.ic wh:f,ch ~~
wi.11 be gerier~t~~ by the intan~ification of land use. ~
,;.
~. That no one ind~.cated the.i.r presence at said pi,~lic hear?
in ~ppdsition; ~n8 tt~at n~ corrrspondence was reee.tvad in
sub~ec~ petitiori. o~position co
~ALIFORNI7~ ENVIRQNMEtJTAL _ pU?~LITY ACT FINDITI~: That the An~heim
City P].ann9ng Commission h~s reviewed the proposal to reclassify sub'ec~
pi~operty f.rom the RS-•A-~l3,000 (Residantial/Agricultural) Zone ~o theJ CL
(Comm~ar.cxal, Li,nited) ?one aiid to construct a 15-room addition to an exi~tin
32-ruom matel an a rectangularly_~happd ~arcel ~f lanc3 consistin o~
approxima~ely 0.72 acre having a t~on~~g~~ o~ a g
west side :~9: Beu~h goulevard, PProsimately 105 feet a~n tihs
having a maximum uepth ot approximatsly 29g
feet, being Iocat,3d app~oximately
Road and further described as 845 6South L'oachr Boulev ihii (Saha a I,~ e~f Ball ~
does hereby apprnve th~ l~egative Dec7aration upoi~ fxn~ing th~treit~ has
.^.onsidered the Negative De~claration togQther wxtih rn
duri:7g the publ:c review proc.ess and fv.rther f•indin on c°mrrients received
inikial studx and any cornments z•etceivod thaL there is~no substantaalsev d~nce
~hat the project wi11 have a significant ef~ect on th~ eiiviro~eriti.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE :CT f,ESOLVED that the bnaheim City Planii:ng
Commi~sion doe~ hereby cJrant subj~~~r pes~ition for Reclassification axiti, by so
doitig, rha~ Tatle 1$-7,onin oL ~~
exclude g ~p An3heim Mun~cipal Coda be amended to
tYie abovo_described pro~>erty frorn tho RS-A-43 000
Ay:icult.ural) Zone ancl i,o incorporate said de3cribed property `into dthe aCL
(Commorcial, Limited} Zone upon ~~he folio+~rin
found to b~ a necessary prerequisi~te to the prop sPd zusenot w ub eC~re hQreby
in ordQr to preserve tche sa£ety eind g~no.ra.~ we1fare of the Citazens of'~~he
City ot Anaheim;
1. That the
dedicate legal ~wner of subject property sh~ll irrevocably o£fer to
to the City of Rnaheit
Boulevard n an additional
, measured noi•~herly F
rom t~ strip of 1a~id along BeACh
corner of
i .
e ultimat~ xight-oE--way
the intersecf~ion of B~ach Boulevar
~ lin.e at the
n width .
~
from twelve (12) feet far th~ fir
s nd Ba11 Road, ancl varying
~n~ then .
~
transitio•,iing from twelve (12) f th:;~e_hundrod (3U0) feat
eeC
threQ-hundred (~pp) feet, ta 0 feet f or the nexC
?. That rior ~
P to the ~xitroduct;ion of an ordinanc~ rezonxng t~ub~~ct
prOPertY. C~nd3.t;ion No. 1, above-mentioned, shall be cu-nplet~xd. :~he `
`c
provisions or, rights granted by this resol•ution sh.all becumo nu~l and '
void by action of ~he planninc~ Cos.unissivn unless said co,~ciiti,on~ are /
complied with within ~ne (1) year trom the date o~ tl~is resolution, or
such further time as the Y.lanning Comm.ission may yranL•.
-2-
PCB~-14
;
~,
~;;~;'+~
~~
3, ThaL- apprnval of this ~pplication conctitu~es approv~l of the proposea
request only to the extont *_nat it c~mp~ies wirh the Anaheim Municipal
Zoning Code and any ather applicab].e City regulations. A~proval do~s
,zot include any ac~ion or fi.ndings as to c~~mpliarice or approval c" the
request regardang any otlaer applicr~ble ordinance, r.egulation ar
r3quirem~nr.
BE IT F[JRTHER R~,SOLVED that the Anaheim C~ty Planning
Commission doc~s hereby £incl and determine that adoptxon n~ this Resoluta.on is
expres~ly predicated upon applicant's campliar.ce wi~th each and all of the
conditi.ons hereinzbove set forth. Should any such conditions, or any part
thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the ~ina1 judc,~m~nt af any
c~urt ~i competenY. jurisdictic~n, then ~his Resolution, and any npprovals
herein caataxn.ed, sha17. be deemed nu11 3nc~ void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLU:iZON is signed and approveu rix me r,his 16th
day of January, 1989.
~;
.__~._.. r"'•~ =~- ../ . ~':'~~Y.~__,~,..,
CH?~IRWOMAN, ~A~NAHEIM CITY rLANNING CGi~.MISSION
ATTEST: ( ~ ~
---____=~-~-~_~~~-~.., ~ ' - ~ ~. --
SECRETARY, ANAHEZM C7'1'Y P ANNING COMMSISSIOPi ,
S7_'ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGF~' ) ~s.
CI'PY Ok' ANN~IEIbt )
I, Edith L. Harxis, Secretmry of the Ana.haim L'ity Planning Comm9.ssion,
clo hereby certif.y that Y.he ~oregoi.ng resolui:ion was ~assed and adopted at a
meet•inq of. the Anaheim City Planning Commission hold on January 16, 198~, by
thQ Lallowing vote of the members tY~er~of: ~
J.YFS: COMMISSIONCRS: BOUAS, bOYI+STUN, CARUSZ~,LO, F'ELDHAU5, FIERBST,
MC HURNEY, DIESSR
NOES: CdMMISSIONEFS: NO.~E
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NfJNE
I:~ 'AITNF.SS WHEREOL', 'I. havQ hereunt~ sot my hr~ud this 16th d8.~ of
January, 1989.
.~~-' ,~,~ ° - / .
____ ~-Y-~ .1.~~._
SECRETA 'Y ANAHEIb; CITY k'LANNING COI~IMTSSI~N
~ _3_ PC89-14
1