Resolution-PC 89-74~
~F ~xoN z~o....~~~
~ ~,lt{ ~ 4' y'~F;1'U"Y1~
~ . ~ ,~.1' 1 '~~-la!~vr~7~i
~ . r •'~:~ ~ ~ 4'k
,f~~
~ \r
~''~
~
~
A RESnLU'.CION OF TI~~ I~TAHETM CI7'Y PLAN1dING CONMISSIOPT
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION N0. d~1-89-4X HE GRANT~D
'WFiEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did rece.ive a
verified petition £or .Reclassification iram WzLLTAM YOCFic~M AND LORENE YOCH~M,
281.0 Randy Avez-ue, Anahoim, CA 92806, ownars, and MOF(LE2Z CORPORATION, 874 N.
Batavia St~reet, Orange, CA 92660, agont for cerCain rea]. property situated
in tihe City of An.ahai,m, Count,y o£ Oranye, St~te of California, deacriY,~d as
~ollows:
THE NORTH 120 FEET OF THE WEST 180 FEET OF THE
NOR~'HWEST QUI~,RT.GR OF THF 50UTHW~ST QUARTER OF TF1E
SUUTEiVZEuT QUAR1'FE2 OF SEC'1'IUN 7, T27 TOWNSH::P 4 SOUTH,
RANGE p W~ST, iJ,N BERNARDINA EtASE AND MFRIDII~N'.
WFiEREAS, che City Plar~ning Commission did hold a public hearing
at the Givic C~ ~-.ec in the City of Anaheim on February 27, 1989 at 1:~0 p.m.,
noh.ice of said public hearing havinc~ beAn duly niven as req~~ired by law ttnd in
accordance wi~,h th4 pruvisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18,03,
~o hear and cansidQr evidarice for And against said proposed recl~xssiLication
anii to investigato and makP fin~ings and recommendations in conneccion
therewitki; and said p~:blic hearing was cont.inuQd to the meQting af Marc;h 7.~,
1939; and
WHEREAS, said Conunissi.on, a~'ter due inspecEion, ihvestigation
and study made by ?tse:lf and in i.ts behalfo and after due consideration of all
evidence an8 reports offered at said liearing, dues Eind and determine the
follow.ing fac~s:
1. TY-at l:he petitianer pr~poses reclassiEication o£ subject
pro~~~ert~ trom ttio RS-A-93,OOU (Residential/Ac~ricultux•al} Zone ~o the FtM-1200
(ResideYitia:, Multiplc~-F~mi'ly) 7one.
2. That although the An2~he~.irn General P1an designah.es subject
proporty for low-density resiile:itSal land use, Goneral Plan T,mendment Nq. 252
ia p~nding to cbange t4~~ land use d~signatioi~ to medium ciensity res=.dential.
, 3. Thz-t the proposeCi reclassiE.icat~on of 3ubjecti propezt~+ is
nQCessary and/~~r dosirab7.e for the order7.y and praper development oE the
community.
4. T2iat tlie propo~ed r~c~assification o~ subjscti v.ro~9rty Qoes
proparly relnte to ths zonos and their permitted uses locf~lly e~tablished in
cl~se proximity to subject propertx and to the z~nes and th~ir permitted uses
generally esta~lishe~~ througY.out the community.
5. TY,at the proposed reclassification of subj~ct proporty
requires tlie doc9icat.ion and improvem~nt of. abu~t:inq streets in accordance wit2i
th~ Circulation Elemont of the GQneral Plan, due tu the s~nticipated inczease
~I in traffic which wiJ.l be generated by the intonsification oi• land usc~.
07.17r -1- PC89-74
i
~ ,
~
... ~ `' • , , . , ~..: ~.~.F4,
~~t>>~
. , q
6. That no ono inciicated their prUSence at sa,id public hearing
in appogition~ and that no correspondQnce was received in appor~ition ta
subjecL• pet3tion.
'ALIF R~N~A_ ~NVIRONMENTAL (1uALIxY ACT. F:(ND~CN~: That t.he Anaheim
Ci:~y Planning Conunission has reviawea the proposal ~o ~mend the Land Use
~lemeut: of the GQneral Plan to redc~signata subject propert~ fram Low Density
Residential tn Mediwn Density R~sident.ia2, to reaclassify subject property
from thc~ RS-A-43,000 (Residential/ Agricultuxal) Zane to th,e RM-120A
(R~sidential, Multiple-Family) anc3 l•,o cunstruc~ a 2-~~ory, 8-unit apartment
buildiny with waivers of. maximum structural height and minimum structuLal
setback on a rect:angularly-shat~ed parcel of l:~nd consisting of appraximately
C.37 acre having a trontage of approxima~ely 120 ~eet on the east side oE Rio
Vista Street, having a m~scimum depth oE 15U feet, being loca~ea approxi.mately
26U ~eeL- south of the centerline of Linroln Avenue and further described as
502 Soutti Rio Vista StreQt~ and does hareby ~pprove the NegaY.ive Declaratian
upon finding that iY, h2~s cons.idered the Negal•.ive Declaration tage~ther with
any cummenrs ~~~~:ei~ed dur.ing the public revisw proce~s and furtlzer finding on
the basis ot the i.nitial stud,y and any comments received ttiat there is no
substantial t~vidsnce that the project will have a aignificant effect on the
envirc~iiment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE TT RFSOL'VED that the Y-naheim City Planning
Commission does herc~by grar~t subject Petition for Reclassificatian and, by so
doing, that T•itle 1$-Zoning of the Anahvim Municipal Code be amended to
excludQ the above--r]escrib~d pro}~er~:y fr.om tbe RS-A-43,000 (Resfdt~nL-it~l/
Agricultilra:) 2one and to incorporatc~ said clescribed property iiito the
RM-1200 (12esidential, Multipl~-Fami.ly) Z~ne upon th9 followinq .^.ond3.L•ions
whicl~ arQ hereby f~una to be a a~eceasary prerequi.site to the praposod use nf
subjoct property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare, oi the
Citiz~ns ot t•h~ City o£ Anaheim:
1. Thal street. lightxng faci.litia~ al.ong Rio Vista 5tre~t shall Le installed
as requirod by the UtilitiQS Gc:neral Manager in accordance with
specifications an filp in ttie Office of th~ Utilities General Me~nager; or
that security in the form of a bozid, corti£icaLe of deposit, leL-ter. of
credit, or cash, in ~n amaunt and ~orm 3at3.si'actory to th~ City of
Anaheim, shall be posted with t'ho City to guar.ax~tee the sa.tisfactory
corepletion of the above--menti.oned improvements. Sai.d security shal]. be
gosted with tha CiL•y of Anaheim prior to the introducrion o£ an ordxnance
rezaning subj~ct proper.ty. The above•-required improt-ements shall be
installed priur to occupancy.
2. Th~.t the leqal oaner of subjec~ pro;~erty s2ia11 dedicate to the City of
Anaheim a strip oE land five (5) fe~ei: in width located alonq the north
property line ot subject property f:or pub]..ic utility purposes.
3. That a fee shal]. bo paid to the City of. Anah~im for tree planting alonq
Rio V.ista Street in an a.~nnur.t as ~stabli.shec? by City Counci.t resolution.
-'l -
PCti9-74
' 1 ~)'l,
;S
~
;r~
~~:k;~
;;; .
4.
~,
~
~~
That prior to inL•r.odu~~tion of ar~ ordin~ance rozoning yub ject property, the
legt~l ~~rok~erty ow:ner eshall preparo and record an unsubordinated aovon~nt
limitinc~ occupancy~ of each apur~ment unit to no more than twu (2) persons
(othE~r tY~a~n ctii:ldren und~r~ the age af twa (2) yoars) per bedroom. Said
limita~ic~Y, shal.l be include~ in each le~se/rental agreement. A copy~ of
Ch~ covenan~ sliall he submi~ted to anci approvc~d by the City Attornoy
pr~iox ta rec~rd~tzo~i. 1~ copy ot the record~d covenant shall he Eurnishad
to the 2oning Divisi~~n.
5. ThaL- a covenanL- sh~all be recorcled agreeing to provide the renter o£ each
dwe:lling unit with wriL•ten information obtained f~-om the School
DisCrict(s) pertain.in~ tn possible overcrowded conditions and bu~ing
status Qf the school(sl sorviny the dwelling uni~.
6. That prior ~o the inti:~~ciuct~.on of an ordinance re2onar_g subject proper~y
or within a period of one (1) yaar o:E the date o~ tihis res~lution,
whichever occurs first,. Cor.dition Nos. 1 through 5, above-montioned,
;shall be completad. Tha pr~visions or righte c~r~nted by this rc~solution
shall become nu:ll a.n8 v~id by actio.~ af the l~lanninq Commission un.l.ess
st~id conditicins ~ire comp:;.l.ed vrith within oi~e ye~~r frnm the d~te of this
reraolut.ion, or su,;}i furthE~r time as the Planning i^.ommission may grant.
7. That: ~pproval oF this appl.icat3.on constitutes ~-;pproval of ~h~ rroposed
zec~u~sst only t~a the extant: t.hat it complic~s with the Anaheim Municipal
~~onina Code ar.cl any other ,~pplicable City regulations. A,pproval due3 no~
fnclu;le any ace:ion or fin3ings as to ~omp,lxanc:e or approva3 af th~
re~c~uest regaxding any other applicable ord~.nance, regulatio~a or
require~ment.
B~ TT FURTHGR RESOLVLD thaC the Anaheim Cit;y Planning• Cornmiss.ion
does he:reby ~ind ano. dekermine t~iat adoption of this Resolution is oxpressly
predic~ted upoxi a~plicant';3 conpli~rice with Fach and ,s11 UE tP.a conditzons
Yeereinabove set farth~ 5havld ar.~.y such conditions, ~r any part t•hereof, be
declared invalid ar. uti~nfor.ceable by the fina7 judqmt3nt of any court oE
~c~npeC4n~ jurisdi~.tion, then ~.his Resoluti.unr and any approvaJ.s herein
cantained, shall be deemed nu.il an~i void.
-3-
, ~j~~~
PC89-79 ~;~;
;+
~~~~'~
~;7
y~~Y
.~... . ~.. ....'~~-r'~~1 ~~S
~n~~Y
~HE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is si.gned and app•roved by me thi,s 13~h dny ~
of MarcYi, 1989.
, ~ ' ~~
,r._~,•' ~ ~ A` 1 ^~ ~~ ;r I ~f~'~ ~~ ~- J..~ `- -- ~:
CHAIEtWOMAN, )CNAI~IEIbf CITY PLF.N27aNG COMMISSION )^;
/ -:
. ,~
ATTES`1'; ` !~«
_ ' .-1~~-.~..L..~ _._.~ ~!i
'; i
f:t
~ 1~.
SECRETA X, ANA.kIEIM f:TY PLANNING CO~~SMISSION
STA~'E OF CALTFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY' OF T,NAHFIDi )
I, EdiL-h L. Eiarr; t3, Secretary of the Anaheim City PJ.anning Commission, do
hexeby cert~.f.y thnt the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a
mgating a.f tYie Anahoim City I~lanning Carnmissien hel~ on March 13, 19$9, by
the :Eollowing vo~e of t2ie mambers theracf:
AYES: COMMTSSTaNERB: BOCTAS, nOYDSTUN, CARUS:[I.LO, I'ELAFiAUS, MESSG
NOES: COMMTSSiONERS: NODTE
VACANT: TWO SEATS
7N NIITNESS WHER~OF, I ha~~~: her~unto set mp hand this 13th day oi
March, 1989.
~r.A
---°~~/?~~~j '
SECRET RY, ANAHEIM CIT'Y PLAtdNING COMMISSION
,,e
~
,~
;~
r,
-4- PC89-74
~
~~ V ~~~:~ , .. ~ . ~ .
'-.'~
,
;s'i
`.:4
' S/