66-223
RESOLUTION NO. 66R-223
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1760
-
WHEREAS, the "City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive a petition for zoning variance from
o!;rNCOLN fiOUARE.. owner
o certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
PARCEL 1: The South 150.24 feet of the North 216.24 feet
of the West half of the Northwest quarter of the Northeast
quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 17, Township 4
South, Range 10 West, in the Rancho Los Coyotes, City of
Anaheim, as shol....n on a map thereof recorded in book 51,
page 11, Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County;
EXCEPT the East 14.00 feet thereof;
ALSO EXCEPT the West 120.00 feet thereof;
PARCEL 2: Lot 1', Tract 2299, in the City of Anaheim, as
shown on a map thereof recorded in book 70, pages 44 to 49
inclusive, Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County.
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a
public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said
petition on Februarv 16. 1966 ,notice of which said public
hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of
Title 18, Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim MUnicipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission, after due
inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its
behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. 1940--Series
19 65-66 , recommending that Variance No. 1760
; and
,-
WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty-two (22) days from
the date of the adoption of said resolution, a written appeal
was filed with the City Council of the City of Anaheim protesting
the action of the City Planning Commission denying said
variance, and said appeal was set for public hearing on
~~~h 22 , 19 66 ,at 7:00 o'clock P.M. at the City
Hall 1n the City of Anaheim, and notice of such public hearing
was duly given as required by law and the provisions of Title 18,
Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim MUnicipal Code; and
WHEREAS, after due investigation and studies made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all the
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City Council
does find and determine that:
-1-
1.
There are exceptionai or extraordinary circum-
stances or conditions applicable to the property
involved or to the intended use of the property
that do not apply generally to the property or
class of use in the same vicinity and zone.
2. That such a variance is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of a substantial
property right possessed by other property in
the same vicinity and zone and denied to the
property in question.
.-
3. That the granting of such variance w.ill not be
materially detrimental to the public welfare or
injurious to the property or improvements in such
vicinity and zone in which the property is located.
4. That the granting of such variance will not
adversely affect the comprehensive general zoning
plan. . .
. NOW , THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by. the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that a conditional zoning variance be, and the
same is hereby granted permitting a waiver of the maximum height
limitation of a free-standing sign (Section l8.62.090(b-2)), .on
the property hereinbefore described, subject to the following
conditions:
1. That adequate clearance of existing electrical lines
shall be provided, as required by the Electrical Divi-
sion of the Utilities Department and the State of
California G.O. 95.
2. That no flashing lights shall be allowed on the free-
standing sign.
3. That subject property shall be developed substantially
in accordance with plans and specifications on file
with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibits Nos. 1 and 2.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that that portion of the peti-
tion for a zoning variance permitting waivers of the maximum
number of free-standing signs (Section 18.62.090 CB-l)) and
required locations of free-standing signs (Section l8.62.090(b-5)),
on the property hereinbefore described, be, and the same is,
hereby denied.
The City Council hereby reserves the right to revoke
such variance permit for good cause or failure of said owner,
its successors or assigns, to comply with the Anaheim Municipal
Code and regulations and the conditions herein. Said variance
is granted for the term prescribed by the Anaheim Municipal
Code unless otherwise specified herein.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by
me this 22nd day of March, ~ .
.4"/ .
- YOR OF THE -I~
CI Y CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
-2-
.-. ....
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SSe
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 66R-223 was
introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the
City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the 22nd day of March,
1966, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUK;IIJ4EN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein
.-..
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of
Anaheim approved and signed said Resolution No. 66R-223 on the
22nd day of March, 1966.
. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this 22nd day of
March, 1966 .
fJ-...""M. "lb~:.. ~.J
CI CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS,.City-Clerk of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution
No. 66R-223, duly passed and adopted by the Anaheim City-Council on
March 22nd, 1966.
"~),r.
dJ~.:.,~
CITY CLERK
, .
........