The URL can be used to link to this page

6574ORDINANCE NO. 6 5 7 4 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 92-2 (AMENDMENT NO. 17 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN) (DEV2021-00069) WHEREAS, pursuant to the City's police power, as granted broadly under Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City Council of the City of Anaheim ("City Council") has the authority to enact and enforce ordinances and regulations for the public peace, morals and welfare of the City of Anaheim (the "City") and its residents; and WHEREAS, on April 29, 1986, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 4709 to establish uniform procedures for the adoption and implementation of Specific Plans for the coordination of future development within the City, and "Zoning and Development Standards" when the Specific Plan includes zoning regulations and development standards to be substituted for existing zoning regulations and development standards under the Zoning Code, which "Zoning and Development Standards" shall be adopted by ordinance independent of the rest of the Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the procedures set forth in Chapter 18.72 (formerly, Chapter 18.93) of the Anaheim Municipal Code, on September 27, 1994, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5454 amending the zoning map to reclassify approximately 549.5 acres of certain real property described therein into the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) No. 92-2 Zone subject to certain conditions as specified therein, and Ordinance No. 5453 relating to establishment of Zoning and Development Standards for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 by the addition of Chapter 18.48 [subsequently renumbered as Chapter 18.116] to said Municipal Code (referred to herein as "ARSP Zoning and Development Standards"); and WHEREAS, the ARSP provides a long-range, comprehensive plan for future development within The Anaheim Resort, an area of the City designated on the General Plan for Commercial Recreation land uses. The Specific Plan includes a land use plan, zoning and development standards, design guidelines and a public facilities plan and permits the development of hotel, convention, retail, and other visitor -serving uses as well as the infrastructure improvements that are needed to support future development; and WHEREAS, in connection with the adoption of the ARSP and related actions (General Plan Amendment, The Anaheim Resort Identity Program and The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program), the City Council certified Master Environmental Impact Report (MEIR) No. 313, with a Statement of Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) No. 0085 by adopting Resolution No. 94R-234 on September 20, 1994. Since being certified in 1994, two validation reports were prepared (1999 and 2004) to evaluate the continued relevance and accuracy of MEIR No. 313; and WHEREAS, since the adoption of the ARSP, the City Council has adopted fourteen (14) amendments and thirteen (13) zoning code adjustments, and two (2) amendment requests have been submitted and subsequently withdrawn, which have expanded the total acreage of the ARSP area to approximately 581.3 acres; and WHEREAS, in support of Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP to update the ARSP to reflect development conditions and regulations, increase the maximum allowable square footage in the Public Recreational (PR) District to accommodate the future expansion of the Anaheim Convention Center and replace the conditions of approval contained in Ordinance No. 5454 with MMP No. 85C in conjunction with related actions (General Plan Amendment, Zoning Code Amendment, The Anaheim Resort Identity Program Amendment and The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program Amendment), the City Council certified Supplemental EIR No. 2008- 340 (Supplemental EIR No. 340), which is a Supplemental EIR to MEIR No. 313, and approved MMP No. 85C by adopting Resolution No. 2012-158 on December 18, 2012. Since being certified in 2012, a validation report was prepared in 2019 to evaluate the continued relevance and accuracy of SEIR No. 340; and WHEREAS, the City Council did receive a verified application from Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. ("Disney") for an amendment to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (DRSP) No. 92-2 in conjunction with approval of the proposed DisneylandForward Project and related entitlements (collectively known as "Development Application No. 2021-00069" or the "Project"), for certain real property primarily located within an area known as The Anaheim Resort®, a 1,078-acre portion of the City especially designated by the City's General Plan for Commercial Recreation land uses and generally located west of the I-5 freeway, south of Vermont Avenue, east of Walnut Street, and north of Chapman Avenue, and also including areas identified in the General Plan as planned extensions of Gene Autry Way between Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street and Clementine Street between Katella Avenue and Orangewood Avenue, portions of which are outside of The Anaheim Resort, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Property") and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, properties owned or leased by Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. or subsidiaries of the Walt Disney Company within the DRSP and ARSP are depicted on Exhibit B ("Disney Properties"); and WHEREAS, properties owned or leased by Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. or subsidiaries of the Walt Disney Company within the ARSP and are listed below: 0 1515 S. Manchester Avenue (currently used as the Manchester Cast Member Lot); • 1585 S. Manchester Avenue (currently occupied by an office building and also used as the Manchester Cast Member Lot); • 1530 S. Harbor Boulevard (currently used as the Manchester Cast Member Lot); • 1900 S. Harbor Boulevard (currently used as the Toy Story Parking Lot); • 333 W. Ball Road (currently used as the Harbor Cast Member Lot); and, • 1717 S. Disneyland Drive (Paradise Pier Hotel, recently renamed "Pixar Place Hotel"); and WHEREAS, to the extent the Project would update The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program, The Anaheim Resort Identity Program and the Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area Maximum Permitted Structural Height Map, the Project site includes the entire Anaheim Resort (inclusive of the ARSP, DRSP, and Hotel Circle Specific Plan No. 93-1); and WHEREAS, the DisneylandForward Project is proposed to allow continued, long- term growth of The Disneyland Resort. The Project would allow the transfer of uses permitted under The Disneyland Resort Project to Disney Properties in other areas of the DRSP and the ARSP. It would also allow future streamlined review of Disney development projects in these areas. The Project would not increase the amount of development square footage or hotel rooms currently allowed in the DRSP and analyzed in EIR No. 311, which the City certified in 1993, and Addendum No. 1 to EIR No. 311, which the City approved in 1996, or the number of hotel rooms currently allowed in the ARSP and analyzed in Supplemental EIR No. 340, which the City certified in 2012. However, it would permit an increase of 4,376 theme park employee parking spaces in the ARSP and provide for future administrative review by the City of Disney's development projects on Disney Properties within the DRSP and the ARSP. It would also modify the limits of the existing Theme Park and Hotel District boundaries within the existing DRSP perimeter (these two Districts would be combined and the expanded District would be called the Theme Park District) and rename the Future Expansion District to the Southeast District within the DRSP. It would also establish Overlays for Disney Properties in the ARSP (Theme Park East Overlay, Theme Park West Overlay and Parking Overlay). Disney is not seeking additional square footage for theme park uses or retail entertainment uses or additional hotel rooms within The Disneyland Resort as part of this Project. Instead, the Project would allow Disney to move the existing Disneyland Resort approvals for these uses to other Disney Properties governed by the DRSP and ARSP; and WHEREAS, the DisneylandForward Project includes the following entitlements, which shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Project": 1. An amendment to the Land Use and Circulation Elements of the General Plan and the City's Bicycle Master Plan, to revise maps, figures, text and tables throughout the General Plan to conform to the following changes: a. An amendment to the Land Use Element, Table LU-4, "General Plan Density Provisions for Specific Areas of the City" describing the amended DRSP and ARSP District names, new Overlays and associated density; b. An amendment to the Circulation Element to (1) remove the planned future extensions of Clementine Street between Katella Avenue and Orangewood Avenue and Gene Autry Way between Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street; and (2) reclassify Disney Way between Anaheim Boulevard and Harbor Boulevard from a six -lane Major Arterial to a four -lane Primary Arterial (with no change to the width of the ultimate public right-of-way); C. An amendment to the Circulation Element to reflect the following intersection lane configurations (1) at Harbor Boulevard and Convention Way, provide two left - turn lanes, one shared through/right-turn lane, and one exclusive right -turn lane on the eastbound approach and one left -turn lane, one shared through/right-turn lane, and one exclusive right -turn lane on the westbound approach (consistent with existing configuration); and, (2) at Haster Street and Gene Autry Way, provide a single shared left-turn/through/right-turn lane for the eastbound approach and three left -turn lanes and two right -turn lanes for the westbound approach. The northbound approach would be equipped with a right -turn signal overlapping with the westbound left -turn signal phase; d. An amendment to the Circulation Element and the City's Bicycle Master Plan (1) to remove the Class I Bike Path in the Southern California Edison right-of-way between Harbor Boulevard and Anaheim Boulevard and add a Class I Bike Path on the north side of Disney Way between Clementine Street and Anaheim Boulevard; (2) to add a Class I Bike Path on the west side of Clementine Street between Alro Way and Disney Way (limits subject to change based on final location of a bike parking facility); and (3) to modify the classification of the planned bike facility on Walnut Street between Katella Avenue and Ball Road from Class II Bike Lanes to a Class I Bike Path on the east side of Walnut Street; 2. Amendment No. 9 to the DRSP and the DRSP Zoning and Development Standards (Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 18.114), which would comprehensively update text, graphics, and imagery throughout the documents to reflect the Project; 3. Amendment No. 17 to the ARSP and the ARSP Zoning and Development Standards (Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 18.116), which would comprehensively update text, graphics, and imagery throughout the documents to reflect the Project, including approval of the Theme Park East Overlay, the Theme Park West Overlay and the Parking Overlay; 4. An amendment to Chapter 18.40 (General Development Standards) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code to amend the Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area Maximum Permitted Structural Height Map (Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.40.080 (Structural Height Limitations — Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area)) which would provide for the DRSP to regulate building heights within a larger portion of the DRSP Theme Park District and the Southeast District and for the ARSP to regulate building heights within the ARSP Theme Park East and West Overlays; 5. Amendment No. 6 to The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program which would comprehensively update text, graphics and imagery throughout the document to reflect current conditions in The Anaheim Resort, expand The Anaheim Resort planting palette to include additional plantings that are more climate appropriate, low water using, disease and pest resistant, and native to Southern California and include information pertaining to pedestrian bridges/crossings and pedestrian and bicycle paths, in conjunction with the Project; 6. Amendment No. 4 to The Anaheim Resort Identity Program which would comprehensively update text, graphics and imagery throughout the document to reflect current conditions in The Anaheim Resort and include information pertaining to Arrival Gateways, Pedestrian Bridge/Crossings and Minor Pedestrian Directional and Informational Signs, in conjunction with the Project; 7. First Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 96-01 between the Walt Disney World Co. (renamed Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. in 2009) and the City of Anaheim to provide continued certainty to Disney to facilitate growth and investment in The Disneyland Resort and specified benefits to the City; and WHEREAS, Amendment No. 17 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, including amendments to Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP92-2) Zoning and Development Standards), has been prepared and submitted for the City's consideration pursuant to the procedures set forth in Chapter 18.72 of the Anaheim Municipal Code and is on file with the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full; and WHEREAS, Amendment No. 17 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would update the ARSP to reflect proposed modifications to The Disneyland Resort Project. It would allow for the transfer of Disneyland Resort Project theme park and parking uses permitted under the DRSP to Disney Properties in the ARSP. This includes the potential transfer of DRSP theme park uses to the proposed new ARSP Theme Park East and Theme Park West Overlays and the potential transfer of parking uses from the DRSP Parking District to the adjacent proposed new ARSP Parking Overlay. It would also provide for an increase of 4,376 theme park -related parking spaces in the proposed ARSP Parking Overlay. The amendment would also provide for future administrative review by the City of Disney's development projects on Disney Properties within the ARSP. It would also include modifications to the ARSP document (including, but not limited to, the land use plan, zoning and development standards, design plan and public facilities plan and a revised phasing plan); and, incorporation of text and graphic modifications throughout the document; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as "CEQA"), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on March 11, 2024, at 5:00 p.m., and notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony concerning the contents and sufficiency of Final Subsequent EIR (SEIR) No. 352, including all written and verbal comments received during the 45-day public review period, the Project, and related actions, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing and based upon its independent review, analysis, and consideration of the environmental information contained in Final SEIR No. 352 to EIR No. 311 and Supplemental EIR No. 340 prepared in connection with the Project, the Planning Commission found substantial evidence in the record to support its actions and did adopt its Resolution No. PC2024-004 finding and recommending that the City Council certify Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 (Final SEIR No. 352) to EIR No. 311 and Supplemental EIR No. 340, including the adoption of Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 387 (MMP No. 387), and determining that (i) Final SEIR No. 352 was prepared for the Project in compliance with the requirements of the CEQA and all applicable CEQA Guidelines; (ii) Final SEIR No. 352 reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City; (iii) Final SEIR No. 352 is adequate to serve as the appropriate environmental documentation for the Project satisfying the requirements of CEQA supplemental review; and, (iv) no further environmental documentation needs to be prepared for CEQA for the Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for the Project, recommended that the City Council approve and adopt Amendment No. 17 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, as proposed as part of DEV2021-00069; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of a summary of evidence, and a report of findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, the City Council did fix the 16th day of April, 2024, as the time, and the City Council Chamber in the Civic Center as the place for a public hearing on the Project, including Amendment No. 17 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92- 2, and for the purpose of considering Final SEIR No. 352 and the Project, and did give notice thereof in the manner and as provided by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against the Project; and WHEREAS, on April 16, 2024, the City Council did hold and conduct such public hearing and did give all persons interested therein an opportunity to be heard, and did receive evidence and reports and did consider the Project, including recommendations of the Planning Commission, potential environmental impacts addressed in Final SEIR No. 352, the Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 387; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2024-029, considered on April 16, 2024 and approved by the City Council on April 17, 2024 concurrently with but prior in time to consideration of this Ordinance, the City Council has heretofore certified FSEIR No. 352 to Final EIR No. 311 and Supplemental EIR No. 340 prepared in connection with the Project and concurrently adopted Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) No. 387 as the mitigation monitoring program for the Project and determined that: (i) FSEIR No. 352 was prepared for the Project in compliance with the requirements of CEQA and all applicable CEQA Guidelines; (ii) FSEIR No. 352 and MMP No. 387 are adequate to serve as the appropriate environmental documentation for the Project; and, (iii) no further environmental documentation needs to be prepared for CEQA for this Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council, and after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for the Project, the City Council does hereby find and determine that all of the following conditions exist with respect to proposed Amendment No. 17 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2: 1. That the property proposed for the specific plan amendment has unique site characteristics, such as topography, location or surroundings that are enhanced by special land use and development standards. The ARSP is located in an area of the City known as The Anaheim Resort, which is designated on the City of Anaheim General Plan for Commercial Recreation land uses. The Commercial Recreation designation is implemented by three Specific Plans, including the ARSP, and is intended to provide for tourist and visitor -serving uses. The proposed amendment would not change the boundaries of the existing ARSP. 2. That the specific plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan, and with the purposes, standards and land use guidelines therein. The ARSP is located in an area of the City known as The Anaheim Resort, which is designated on the City of Anaheim General Plan for Commercial Recreation land uses intended for tourist and visitor -serving uses. The Project provides for a mix of these types of uses, including theme park, retail, restaurant, entertainment, hotels, and parking uses. The proposed ARSP amendment is consistent with and implements the existing goals and policies of the General Plan and with the purposes, standards and land use guidelines therein, including following the approval of the General Plan Amendment, now pending, to the Land Use and Circulation Elements and the City's Bicycle Master Plan. The Project's consistency with the General Plan is described in detail in Table 5.10-1 (Consistency of the Project with the General Plan), which is on file with the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full. 3. That the specific plan results in development of desirable character that will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed amendment provides for development of theme park, hotel, parking and other visitor - serving uses consistent with the General Plan Commercial Recreation land use designation. The proposed amendment also includes amended zoning and development standards and design guidelines for these uses, including, but not limited to, building heights, setbacks and screening requirements, which have been designed to be compatible with surrounding uses, implement the General Plan, and will enhance and preserve the general welfare, as described in detail in the proposed amended Specific Plan. 4. That the specific plan contributes to a balance of land uses throughout the City by encouraging tourist and entertainment related industries in an area of the City specifically designated for this type of development. The proposed amendment would allow for the transfer of previously approved theme park square footage and parking spaces from the DRSP to Disney Properties in the ARSP to permit greater flexibility in the development of these uses. This includes the potential transfer of DRSP theme park uses to the proposed new ARSP Theme Park East and Theme Park West Overlays and the potential transfer of parking uses from the DRSP Parking District to the adjacent proposed new ARSP Parking Overlay. The proposed amendment would permit an increase of 4,376 theme park -related parking spaces in the proposed new ARSP Parking Overlay north of Ball Road. The proposed amendment would not increase the overall maximum development square footage or hotel rooms currently allowed by the ARSP and the DRSP. 5. That the specific plan respects environmental, aesthetic and historic resources consistent with economic realities as the potential environmental impacts associated with the Project were analyzed and applicable mitigation measures have been adopted as further described in City Council's heretofore adoption of Resolution No. 2024-*** certifying FSEIR No. 352 to Final EIR No. 311 and Final Supplemental EIR No. 340 for the Project, and concurrent adoption of Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 387 as the mitigation -monitoring program for the Project; and WHEREAS, the City Council determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this ordinance, that the facts stated in this ordinance are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentation, the staff report and all materials in the files for the Project. There is no substantial evidence that negates the findings made in this ordinance. The City Council expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 be, and the same is hereby, amended and restated in its entirety to read in full as indicated in Amendment No. 17 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 document dated March 2024, as indicated in the attachment labeled Exhibit C ("Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2") and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. That Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) No. 387 is the required MMP for the development of The Disneyland Resort Project and applicable to the following ARSP Overlays: Theme Park East Overlay, Theme Park West Overlay and Parking Overlay, as indicated in the attachments labeled Exhibit D ("Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) No. 387") and Exhibit E ("Theme Park and Parking Overlays"), incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 3. That pursuant to the above findings, this City Council approves the above actions, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval for development of The Disneyland Resort Project in the following ARSP Overlays: Theme Park East Overlay, Theme Park West Overlay and Parking Overlay, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim, as indicated in the attachments labeled Exhibit F ("DisneylandForward Conditions of Approval") and Exhibit E ("Theme Park and Parking Overlays"), incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY The City Council of the City of Anaheim hereby declares that should any section, paragraph, sentence, phrase, term or word of this ordinance be declared for any reason to be invalid or unconstitutional by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, it is the intent of the City Council that it would have adopted all other portions of this ordinance independent of the elimination herefrom of any such portion as may be declared invalid or unconstitutional. If any section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause and phrase or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one (or more) section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase had been declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 5. CERTIFICATION The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance or a summary thereof to be printed once within fifteen (15) days after its adoption in the Anaheim Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Anaheim. SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force thirty (30) days from and after its final passage. THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE was considered at a public hearing held at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim on the 16"' day of April, 2024 and introduced at the conclusion of the public hearing on the 17'h day of April, 2024, and thereafter passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 7 h day of May, 2024, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Mayor Aitken and Council Members Kurtz, Diaz, Leon, Rubalcava, Faessel and Meeks NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None CITY OF ANAHEIM By: MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM EXHIBIT "A" "PROPERTY" [Behind this sheet.] (DEV2021-00069) I:inti1: Av r i I Ilk �',� _ 'IV Mall Rd } �F 3:[ii Rd w .■ w - L , * � � � ■ r. 4 r.r ' Crrr11�,� Ave --' ,� 4 k+ i • . ' . S r Rion a ti w W'Katella�E Kt.'i.. .... is Convenllofl Wa€? . 1 Geri- ITutry_Way t� E Granitc•4o4ol Ave ap 4 ProjectDesignated for Future Extension in Generall Plan Circulation Element Specific Plan Areas Resort Specific Plan (SP92-1) Disneyland ResortAnaheim Specific r m �. SpecificHotel Circle ` a R _ •�_.i i iz -- .- - �� l _-�. . � - it . _... .._ �. •�..-. •- .1 EXHIBIT "B" "DISNEY PROPERTIES" [Behind this sheet.] (DEV2021-00069) Disney Properties EXHIBIT B 3 Cerritos Ave v r x Ball Rd Cerritos Ave � N a, ' . J �z iy ' .♦ _ r KateIla Ave ......... ' Gene Autry Way c . �Ps EP orangewood Ave 9` H Chapman Ave 0 1,000 Feet Key to Features 01 Properties owned or leased by Walt Disney Parks City Boundary and Resorts U.S., Inc. or subsidiaries of the Walt Disney Company (the "Disney Properties") Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 Boundary Subject to a Long -Term Third -Party Lease Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 Boundary The Anaheim Resort® Boundary Hotel Circle Specific Plan No. 93-1 Boundary 3585-3 EXHIBIT "C" "THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO.92-2" [Behind this sheet.] (DEV2021-00069) ANAHEIM R[50RT r THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 92-2 v � r K' ..... . . . . . City of Anaheim Planning Commission Public Review Draft (March 2024) ��a, This page is intentionally blank. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Table of Contents PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Introduction............................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose of the Specific Plan..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Organization of the Specific Plan Document............................................................................. 1-2 1.4 Existing Setting......................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4.1 The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan................................................................................. 1-5 1.4.2 The Hotel Circle Specific Plan............................................................................................ 1-5 1.5 Implementing the General Plan................................................................................................. 1-5 1.6 Specific Plan Goals................................................................................................................... 1-6 1.7 The Development Plan.............................................................................................................. 1-7 1.7.1 Land Use........................................................................................................................... 1-7 1.7.2 Development Density......................................................................................................... 1-8 1.7.3 Development Standards and Guidelines............................................................................ 1-8 1.7.4 Development Summary ...................................................................................................... 1-8 1.8 Implementing the Specific Plan................................................................................................. 1-9 2.0 PLANNING CONTENT..................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Purpose of the Specific Plan..................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Specific Plan Policies................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2.1 Create and Enhance an Urban Destination Resort Environment ........................................ 2-1 2.2.2 Establish a Unified Resort Identity..................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.3 Supply Visitor and Convention Facilities to Meet Long -Term Demand ............................... 2-2 2.2.4 Improve Public Facilities, Services and Infrastructure to Accommodate Growth ................ 2-2 2.2.5 Improve the Transportation System................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.6 Develop Implementation Mechanisms to Assure Quality Development .............................. 2-3 2.2.7 Enhance and Protect Surrounding Uses............................................................................ 2-3 2.3 Authority and Scope of the Specific Plan.......................................................... 2.4 Relationship to City Planning Documents and Regulations....................................................... 2-5 2.4.1 Relationship to the General Plan........................................................................................ 2-5 2.4.2 Relationship to the Zoning Ordinance................................................................................ 2-5 2.4.3 California Environmental Quality Act Requirements........................................................... 2-5 2.4.4 Relationship to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan ......................................................... 2-6 2.4.5 Relationship to the Hotel Circle Specific Plan..................................................................... 2-7 3.0 LAND USE PLAN............................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Regional Location..................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Existing Conditions................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.1 The Specific Plan Area....................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2.2 Existing Uses......................................................................................... .... ...................3-1 3.3 Land Use Plan.......................................................................................................................... 3-4 3.3.1 Land Use........................................................................................................................... 3-4 3.3.2 Commercial Recreation (C-R) District Development Density .............................................. 3-7 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Table of Contents 3.3.3 Mobilehome Park (MHP) Overlay..................................................................................... 3-10 3.3.4 Anaheim Resort Residential (ARR) Overlay..................................................................... 3-10 3.3.5 Public Recreation (PR) District Development Density ...................................................... 3-10 3.3.6 Theme Park (TP) Overlay................................................................................................ 3-10 3.3.7 Parking (P) Overlay.......................................................................................................... 3-10 3.3.8 Central Core Development Standards.............................................................................. 3-17 3.4 Non Visitor -Serving Uses........................................................................................................ 3-19 4.0 PUBLIC FACILITIES PLAN............................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Regional Circulation Programs..................................................................................................4-1 4.2 Regional Infrastructure Programs............................................................................................. 4-3 4.3 Vehicular Circulation Plan for the Anaheim Resort .................................................................... 4-3 4.3.1 Connections to Interstate 5(1-5)......................................................................................... 4-3 4.4 Anaheim Resort Arterial/ Secondary System............................................................................ 4-4 4.5 Transit Plans...........................................................................................................................4-18 4.5.1 The Disneyland Resort ..................................................................................................... 4-18 4.5.2 East-West Transit Connection.......................................................................................... 4-18 4.5.3 HOV Lane System........................................................................................................... 4-18 4.5.4 Bus Service...................................................................................................................... 4-18 4.5.5 Intercity Commuter Rail Service....................................................................................... 4-18 4.6 Pedestrian Circulation Plans................................................................................................... 4-19 4.7 Water...................................................................................................................................... 4-22 4.8 Sanitary Sewer....................................................................................................................... 4-24 4.9 Storm Drain.............................................................................................................................4-25 4.10 Electricity................................................................................................................................ 4-26 4.11 Natural Gas............................................................................................................................. 4-27 4.12 Telephone Services................................................................................................................ 4-27 4.13 Television/Cable Service......................................................................................................... 4-27 4.14 Solid Waste............................................................................................................................. 4-27 4.15 Public Services..................................................................................................................... 4-28 5.0 DESIGN PLAN................................................................................................................. 5-1 5.1 Design Plan Objectives............................................................................................................. 5-2 5.1.1 Create Visual Continuity between the ARSP Area and the Adjacent Disneyland Resort SpecificPlan Area............................................................................................................. 5-2 5.1.2 Create a High Quality, Visually Appealing, Pedestrian -Oriented Environment .................... 5-2 5.1.3 Create Landscape and Design Guidelines to Reinforce the Area's Identity ........................ 5-3 5.1.4 Enhance Public Views of the Theme Parks, including Back -of -House Uses, From Public Walkwaysand Streets...................................................................................................................... 5-3 5.2 Design Concepts....................................................................................................................... 5-3 5.2.1 Transform and Unify with Landscape................................................................................. 5-3 5.2.2 Create a District with a Grand Scale.................................................................................. 5-3 5.2.3 Emphasize Landscaping on Public Streets........................................................................ 5-4 5.2.4 Orient Visitors Visually....................................................................................................... 5-4 5.2.5 Create a Recognizable Center for the Anaheim Resort ...................................................... 5-4 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Table of Contents PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 5.2.6 Coordinate Streetscape Improvements with other Improvements ...................................... 5-5 5.2.7 Establish a Clear Design Hierarchy................................................................................... 5-5 5.3 Landscape Concept Plan.......................................................................................................... 5-5 5.3.1 Plant Material Selection and Use....................................................................................... 5-6 5.3.1.1 Basic Selection Criteria.................................................................................... 5-6 5.3.1.2 Tree Selection and Use Criteria........................................................................ 5-6 5.3.1.3 Shrub, Vine and Ground Cover Selection and Use Criteria .............................. 5-8 5.3.2 Layered Landscape Design Criteria................................................................................. 5-10 5.3.3 Minimum Tree Density..................................................................................................... 5-13 5.3.3.1 Tree Density to Vary According to Adjacent Use ............................................ 5-13 5.3.3.2 The Tree Density Factor................................................................................. 5-13 5.3.4 Plant Selection................................................................................................................. 5-16 5.4 Landscape Cross Sections..................................................................................................... 5-18 5.5 Identity Concept Plan.............................................................................................................. 5-50 5.6 Design Criteria for the Public Realm....................................................................................... 5-51 5.6.1 Gateways.........................................................................................................................5-53 5.6.1.1 Freeway Gateways......................................................................................... 5-53 5.6.1.2 Arterial Gateways........................................................................................... 5-55 5.6.1.2.1 Harbor Boulevard North............................................................ 5-55 5.6.1.2.2 Harbor Boulevard South........................................................... 5-55 5.6.1.2.3 Katella Avenue East................................................................. 5-55 5.6.1.2.4 Katella Avenue West................................................................ 5-56 5.6.1.3 Vehicular Arrival Gateway.............................................................................. 5-56 5.6.1.3.1 Theme Park East Overlay Vehicular Arrival Gateway ............... 5-56 5.6.1.3.2 Parking Overlay Vehicular Arrival Gateway ............................... 5-56 5.6.1.4 Pedestrian Arrival Gateway............................................................................ 5-57 5.6.1.4.1 Theme Park East Overlay Pedestrian Arrival Gateway ............. 5-57 5.6.2 Public Streets............................................................................................. .................... 5-57 5.7 Design Criteria for the Setback Realm.................................................................................... 5-58 5.7.1 Exterior Lighting............................................................................................................... 5-58 5.7.2 Freestanding Monument Sign Guidelines........................................................................ 5-58 5.7.3 Central Core.................................................................................................................... 5-59 5.7.3.1 Central Core Architectural Guidelines............................................................. 5-60 5.7.3.2 Central Core Circulation and Parking Guidelines ............................................ 5-60 5.7.3.3 Central Core Landscape Guidelines............................................................... 5-61 5.7.4 Areas Outside of the Central Core................................................................................... 5-61 5.8 Design Criteria for the Private Realm...................................................................................... 5-62 5.8.1 Organization of Private Realm Design Standards and Guidelines .................................... 5-62 5.8.2 General Site Planning Guidelines.................................................................................... 5-62 5.8.3 Service, Storage and Maintenance Areas and Loading Docks Guidelines ....................... 5-63 5.8.4 Exterior Lighting Guidelines............................................................................................. 5-63 5.8.5 Surface Parking Area Guidelines..................................................................................... 5-64 5.8.6 Parking Structure Guidelines........................................................................................... 5-65 5.8.7 Building Appearance Guidelines...................................................................................... 5-66 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Table of Contents 5.8.8 360 Degree Architectural Treatments............................................................................... 5-67 5.8.9 Building Massing.............................................................................................................. 5-67 5.8.10 Building Materials and Colors.......................................................................................... 5-68 5.8.10.1 Walls............................................................................................................ 5-68 5.8.10.2 Windows...................................................................................................... 5-68 5.8.10.3 Roof Materials.............................................................................................. 5-69 5.8.10.4 Building Color............................................................................................... 5-69 5.8.10.5 Awnings....................................................................................................... 5-69 5.8.11 Sign Guidelines................................................................................................................ 5-69 5.8.12 Landscape Guidelines..................................................................................................... 5-70 5.8.13 Wall and Fence Guidelines.............................................................................................. 5-71 5.8.14 Pedestrian Paving Guidelines.......................................................................................... 5-71 6.0 General Plan Consistency.............................................................................................. 6-1 7.0 Zoning and Development Standards............................................................................. 7-1 8.0 Legal Description............................................................................................................8-1 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1.4-1 ARSP/The Anaheim Resort Boundaries............................................................................ 1-4 Exhibit 1.8-1 Development Plan........................................................................................................... 1-10 Exhibit3.1-1 Regional Location Map...................................................................................................... 3-1 Exhibit 3.2-1 ARSP/The Anaheim Resort Boundaries............................................................................ 3-2 Exhibit 3.2-2 Aerial Photograph with the ARSP and The Anaheim Resort Boundaries ........................... 3-3 Exhibit3.3-1 Development Plan............................................................................................................. 3-6 Exhibit 3.3-2 Commercial Recreation (C-R) District Development Density Plan ..................................... 3-9 Exhibit 3.3-3 Mobilehome Park (MHP) Overlay in the C-R District........................................................ 3-12 Exhibit 3.3-4 Anaheim Resort Residential (ARR) Overlay in the C-R District ........................................ 3-13 Exhibit 3.3-5 Public Recreation (PR) District Plan................................................................................ 3-14 Exhibit 3.3-6 Theme Park JP) Overlay in the C-R District................................................................... 3-15 Exhibit 3.3-7 Parking (P) Overlay in the C-R District............................................................................ 3-16 Exhibit 3.3-8 Central Core Plan............................................................................................................ 3-18 Exhibit 4.1-1 Vehicular Circulation Plan.................................................................................................. 4-2 Exhibit 4.4 Cross Section Street Segments Within The Anaheim Resort ............................................. 4-6 Exhibit 4.4-1 Disneyland Drive (North of Ball Road) Cross Section........................................................ 4-7 Exhibit 4.4-2 Disneyland Drive (Between 825 feet n/o Katella Avenue and 1,350 feet n/o Katella Avenue) CrossSection.......................................................................................................................................... 4-7 Exhibit 4.4-3 West Street (South of Katella Avenue) Cross Section ...................................................... 4-8 Exhibit 4.4-4 West Place Cross Section................................................................................................. 4-8 Exhibit 4.4-5 Disney Way (East of Clementine Street) Cross Section .................................................... 4-8 Exhibit 4.4-6 Ultimate Katella Avenue (Between Interstate 5 and West Street/Disneyland Drive) Cross Section................................................................................................................................................. 4-10 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Table of Contents Exhibit 4.4-7 Ultimate Katella Avenue (Between Walnut Street and West Street/Disneyland Drive) Cross Section.................................................................................................................................................. 4-10 Exhibit 4.4-8 Walnut Street (Between Ball Road and Goodhue Avenue) Cross Section ....................... 4-11 Exhibit 4.4-9 Harbor Boulevard (Between Chapman Avenue and Orangewood Avenue) Cross Section................................................................................................................................................4-11 Exhibit 4.4-10 Harbor Boulevard (Orangewood Avenue to Manchester Avenue on the East Side and Orangewood Avenue to 150-250 Feet South of Manchester Avenue on the West Side) Cross Section 4-12 Exhibit 4.4-11 Harbor Boulevard (Between Manchester Avenue on the East Side and 150-250 feet South of Manchester Avenue on the West Side to the Interstate 5 Interchange) Cross Section ...................... 4-12 Exhibit 4.4-12 Harbor Boulevard (Interstate 5 to Vermont Avenue) Cross Section ............................... 4-12 Exhibit 4.4-13 Ball Road (With Landscaped Median West of West Place) Cross Section ..................... 4-12 Exhibit 4.4-14 Ball Road (Between West Place and Cast Place) Cross Section ................................... 4-13 Exhibit 4.4-15 Ball Road (East of Cast Place) Cross Section............................................................... 4-13 Exhibit 4.4-16 Clementine Street Cross Section................................................................................... 4-13 Exhibit 4.4-17 Haster Street/Anaheim Boulevard Cross Section........................................................... 4-14 Exhibit 4.4-18 Convention Way Cross Section..................................................................................... 4-14 Exhibit 4.4-19 Gene Autry Way (East of Haster Street) Cross Section ................................................. 4-15 Exhibit 4.4-20 West Manchester Avenue Cross Section.................................................................... 4-15 Exhibit 4.4-21 North Manchester Avenue (Adjacent to Interstate 5, North of the Parking Overlay) Cross Section.................................................................................................................................................. 4-15 Exhibit 4.4-22 North Manchester Avenue (Adjacent to Interstae 5 and the Praking Overlay, North of Alro Way) Cross Section............................................................................................................................. 4-16 Exhibit 4.4-23 Manchester Avenue, East of Anaheim Boulevard (Adjacent to Interstate 5) Cross Section .............................................................................................................................................................. 4-16 Exhibit 4.4-24 Orangewood Avenue Cross Section.............................................................................. 4-16 Exhibit 4.4-25 Chapman Avenue Cross Section................................................................................... 4-16 Exhibit 4.4-26 Alro Way Cross Section................................................................................................. 4-16 Exhibit 4.4-27 Casa Vista Street Cross Section.................................................................................... 4-17 Exhibit 4.4-28 Vermont Avenue Cross Section..................................................................................... 4-17 Exhibit 4.4-29 Wilken Way Cross Section.......................................................................................... 4-17 Exhibit 4.4-30 Zeyn Street Cross Section........................................................................................... 4-17 Exhibit 4.6-1 Proposed Pedestrian Circulation..................................................................................... 4-20 Exhibit 4.6-2 Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Points......................................................................... 4-21 Exhibit 5.2-1 Utilize the Streets for Landscaping.................................................................................... 5-4 Exhibit 5.2-2 The Three Elements of the Design Hierarchy: The Public Realm, The Setback Realm, and thePrivate Realm................................................................................................................................... 5-5 Exhibit5.3-1 Medium Canopy Trees...................................................................................................... 5-7 Exhibit5.3-2 Large Canopy Trees.......................................................................................................... 5-7 Exhibit 5.3-3 Vertical and Pyramidal Trees............................................................................................. 5-8 Exhibit 5.3-4 Use of Shrubs to Screen Surface Parking Lots.................................................................. 5-9 Exhibit 5.3-5 Formal (Clipped) Hedges Vary in Height.......................................................................... 5-9 Exhibit 5.3-6 Ground Cover Includes Turf and Other Grasses, Annuals, and Other Varieties of Plants 5-10 Exhibit 5.3-7 Layered Landscape Design Criteria for Properties with Frontages Greater than 300 Feet5-11 Exhibit 5.3-8 Layered Landscape Design Criteria for Properties with Frontages Less than 300 Feet ... 5-11 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Table of Contents PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 5.3-9 Layered Landscape Setback Width Criteria..................................................................... 5-12 Exhibit 5.3-10 Tree Density Factor Plan............................................................................................... 5-15 Exhibit 5.4 Landscape Cross Sections................................................................................................. 5-19 Exhibit 5.4-1 Disneyland Drive (North of Ball Road) Landscape Cross Section .................................... 5-20 Exhibit 5.4-2 Disneyland Drive (Between 825 feet n/o Katella Avenue and 1,350 feet n/o Katella Avenue) LandscapeCross Section..................................................................................................................... 5-21 Exhibit 5.4-3 West Street (South of Katella Avenue) Landscape Cross Section ................................... 5-22 Exhibit 5.4-4 West Place Landscape Cross Section............................................................................. 5-23 Exhibit 5.4-5 Disney Way (East of Clementine Street) Landscape Cross Section ................................ 5-24 Exhibit 5.4-6 Ultimate Katella Avenue (Between Interstate 5 and West Street/Disneyland Drive) LandscapeCross Section..................................................................................................................... 5-25 Exhibit 5.4-7 Ultimate Katella Avenue (Between Walnut Street and West Street/Disneyland Drive) LandscapeCross Section..................................................................................................................... 5-26 Exhibit 5.4-8 Walnut Street Landscape Cross Section......................................................................... 5-27 Exhibit 5.4-9 Harbor Boulevard (Between Chapman Avenue and Orangewood Avenue) Landscape Cross Section.................................................................................................................................................. 5-28 Exhibit 5.4-10 Harbor Boulevard (Orangewood to Manchester on the East Side and Orangewood to 150- 250 Feet South of Manchester Avenue on the West Side) Landscape Cross Section ........................... 5-29 Exhibit 5.4-11 Harbor Boulevard (Between Manchester Avenue on the East Side and 150-250 feet South of Manchester Avenue on the West Side to the Interstate 5 Interchange) Landscape Cross Section .... 5-30 Exhibit 5.4-12 Harbor Boulevard (Interstate 5 to Vermont Avenue) Landscape Cross Section ............. 5-31 Exhibit 5.4-13 Ball Road (West of West Place) Landscape Cross Section .......................................... 5-32 Exhibit 5.4-14 Ball Road (Between West Place and Harbor Boulevard) Landscape Cross Section ...... 5-33 Exhibit 5.4-15 Ball Road (East of Cast Place) Landscape Cross Section ............................................ 5-34 Exhibit 5.4-16 Clementine Street Landscape Cross Section................................................................ 5-35 Exhibit 5.4-17 Haster Street/Anaheim Boulevard Landscape Cross Section ........................................ 5-36 Exhibit 5.4-18 Convention Way Landscape Cross Section................................................................... 5-37 Exhibit 5.4-19 Gene Autry Way Landscape Cross Section................................................................... 5-38 Exhibit 5.4-20 West Manchester Avenue Landscape Cross Section .................................................... 5-39 Exhibit 5.4-21 North Manchester Avenue (Adjacent to Interstate 5, North of the Parking Overlay) LandscapeCross Section..................................................................................................................... 5-40 Exhibit 5.4-22 North Manchester Avenue (Adjacent to Interstate 5 and the Parking Overlay, North of Alro Way) Landscape Cross Section............................................................................................................ 5-41 Exhibit 5.4-23 Manchester Avenue, East of Anaheim Boulevard (Adjacent to Interstate 5) Landscape CrossSection........................................................................................................................................ 5-42 Exhibit 5.4-24 Orangewood Avenue Landscape Cross Section............................................................ 5-43 Exhibit 5.4-25 Chapman Avenue Landscape Cross Section................................................................. 5-44 Exhibit 5.4-26 Alro Way Landscape Cross Section............................................................................... 5-45 Exhibit 5.4-27 Casa Vista Street Landscape Cross Section................................................................. 5-46 Exhibit 5.4-28 Vermont Avenue Landscape Cross Section................................................................... 5-47 Exhibit 5.4-29 Wilken Way Landscape Cross Section.......................................................................... 5-48 Exhibit 5.4-30 Zeyn Street Landscape Cross Section.......................................................................... 5-49 Exhibit 5.6-1 The Three Elements of the Design Hierarchy: The Public Realm, The Setback Realm, and thePrivate Realm................................................................................................................................ 5-51 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Table of Contents PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit5.6-2 The Public Realm............................................................................................................ 5-52 Exhibit 5.6-3 Gateway Location Plan.................................................................................................... 5-54 Exhibit 5.6-4 Harbor Boulevard North Gateway.................................................................................... 5-55 Exhibit 5.6-5 Katella Avenue West Gateway........................................................................................ 5-56 Exhibit 5.7-1 The Three Elements of the Design Hierarchy: The Public Realm, The Setback Realm, and thePrivate Realm ................................................................................................................................. 5-58 Exhibit 5.7-2 Freestanding Monument Sign.......................................................................................... 5-59 Exhibit 5.7-3 Freestanding Sign Design Criteria................................................................................... 5-59 Exhibit 5.7-4 Basic Central Core Design Principles.............................................................................. 5-59 Exhibit 5.7-5 Redundant Curb Cuts...................................................................................................... 5-60 Exhibit 5.7-6 Consolidate Curb Cuts.................................................................................................... 5-60 Exhibit 5.7-7 Limit Portion of Elevation Devoted to Parking Area Entries .............................................. 5-60 Exhibit 5.7-8 Special Intersection Landscape Treatment...................................................................... 5-61 Exhibit 5.7-9 Harbor Boulevard/Katella Avenue Intersection Area ........................................................ 5-61 Exhibit 5.8-1 The Three Elements of the Design Hierarchy: The Public Realm, The Setback Realm, and thePrivate Realm................................................................................................................................. 5-62 Exhibit 5.8-2 Landscape Buffer between Uses..................................................................................... 5-63 Exhibit 5.8-3 Screen Service Areas from View..................................................................................... 5-63 Exhibit 5.8-4 Screen Parking From View.............................................................................................. 5-65 Exhibit 5.8-5 Pedestrians Move Perpendicular to Parking Spaces ....................................................... 5-65 Exhibit 5.8-6 Landscaping Detail at Ground Level................................................................................ 5-71 Exhibit5.8-7 Wall/Fencing Plan............................................................................................................ 5-73 LIST OF TABLES Table 1.8-1 Development Summary ..................................................................................................... 1-11 Table 1.8-2 Existing and Permitted Development................................................................................. 1-12 Table 4.8-1 Existing Sewer System Deficiencies and Recommended Improvements for Year 2030 .... 4-25 Table 5.3-1 Levels of Tree Density....................................................................................................... 5-13 Table5.3-2 Tree Point Values.............................................................................................................. 5-14 Table 5.8-1 Allowable Lighting Levels by Level of Security.................................................................. 5-64 APPENDICES Appendix A - List of Specific Plan Amendments, Adjustments and Associated Actions (Note: For information only: This document will be updated after subsequent amendments or adjustments to the Specific Plan.) The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) This page is intentionally blank. Table of Contents The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 1.0 Executive Summary 1.1 Introduction On September 27, 1994, the Anaheim City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5453 relating to the establishment of Zoning and Development Standards for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) No. 92-2 by the addition of Chapter 18.116 (formerly 18.48) to the Anaheim Municipal Code, and Ordinance No. 5454, amending the zoning map to reclassify approximately 549.5 acres of certain real property into the ARSP. The ARSP was specifically designated by the City's General Plan for recreation and tourist/convention-related activities. Since the adoption of the ARSP, proposed modifications to the specific plan have included 16 amendments and 13 adjustments, which have included an expansion of the ARSP area to include 31.8 additional acres, increasing the total acreage of the ARSP area to 581.3 acres. Refer to Appendix A, `List of Specific Plan Amendments and Adjustments and Associated Actions including General Plan Amendments' for a consolidated list of all amendments and adjustments. In 2021, to allow continued, long-term growth of The Disneyland Resort, Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. (Disney) proposed DisneylandForward to allow the transfer of uses permitted under The Disneyland Resort Project to other areas of the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 (DRSP) and properties within the ARSP owned or leased by Disney or other subsidiaries of The Walt Disney Company (Disney ARSP Properties, and, collectively with Disney's properties in the DRSP, Disney Property or Disney Properties). This proposal did not request an increase in the amount of development square footage or hotel rooms 1-1 1.0 Executive Summary allowed in the DRSP, or the number of hotel rooms allowed in the ARSP. However, it included an increase of 4,376 theme park -related parking spaces in the ARSP. The proposal also requested future administrative review by the City of Disney's development projects on Disney Property. In [insert year], the Anaheim City Council approved Disneyland Forward, including amendments to the Land Use and Circulation Elements of the City's General Plan and the Bicycle Master Plan [Resolution No. xxx, adopted on xxx], and Amendment No. 17 to the ARSP document and zoning and development standards [Ordinance Nos. adopted on xxx]. 1.2 Purpose of the Specific Plan The purpose of the ARSP is to provide a long- range comprehensive plan for future development of approximately 581.3 acres within The Anaheim Resort, which encompasses 1,078 acres generally located adjacent to and southwest of Interstate 5 (1-5). To achieve this, the ARSP establishes an overall identity and land use plan that is intended to maximize the area's potential, guide future development, and ensure a balance between growth and infrastructure. The ARSP additionally includes specific zoning and development standards, design guidelines, a streetscape program, and a public facilities plan, which describe how the Plan's goals and objectives will be realized. The ARSP will permit the development of hotel, convention, retail, and other visitor -serving uses as well as the infra- structure improvements that will be needed to support future development. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 1.3 Organization of the Specific Plan Document The Specific Plan is divided into eight sections: • Section 1.0, the Executive Summary, is a brief overview of the ARSP. • Section 2.0, the Planning Context, discusses the purpose of the ARSP, the City planning policies that affect development of the ARSP area, the authority and scope of the ARSP, and its relationship to other City planning documents. • Section 3.0, the Land Use Plan, describes existing land uses and conditions within the ARSP area, and describes the proposed land uses and development densities. • Section 4.0, the Public Facilities Plan, discusses the existing and proposed infrastructure within the Specific Plan area, including, but not limited to, circulation and transit connectivity, water, sewer, waste, and energy services. • Section 5.0, the Design Plan establishes the design criteria for the ARSP area. • Section 6.0, General Plan Consistency, describes how the ARSP is consistent with the City's General Plan. • Section 7.0, the Zoning and Development Standards, regulate development within the ARSP area. • Section 8.0, Zoning Explanation, compares the development standards contained in the Plan to existing City regulations. • Section 9.0, Legal Description, contains a legal description of the Specific Plan area. The Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area Maximum Permitted Structural Height Map (permitted by Section 18.40.080 (Structural 1-2 1.0 Executive Summary Height Limitations — Anaheim Municipal Code)), The Anaheim Resort Public Realm and Landscape Program, The Anaheim Resort Identity Program and Planning Standard Details 5-9, which are referenced throughout the Specific Plan, are on file with the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department. 1.4 Existing Setting The ARSP area encompasses 581.3 acres within the 1,078-acre Anaheim Resort, a portion of the City of Anaheim specially designated by the City's General Plan for recreation and tourist/convention-related activities and supporting uses. The Anaheim Resort is located 35 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles and 7 miles northwest of Santa Ana, in Central Orange County. As shown in Exhibit 1.4-1 (ARSP/The Anaheim Resort Boundaries), The Anaheim Resort is located generally west of the 1-5 corridor, south of Vermont Avenue, east of Walnut Street, and north of Chapman Avenue. In addition to this Specific Plan, the City has undertaken and adopted other planning efforts for the remaining 496.5 acres in The Anaheim Resort. The City has adopted the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 92-1) covering 489.7 acres of The Anaheim Resort and the Hotel Circle Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 93.1) covering 6.8 acres of The Anaheim Resort. The three Specific Plans have been prepared to complement one another by incorporating similar zoning and development standards, design guidelines, streetscape and signage programs and infrastructure improvements. Together, these documents guide the development and enhancement of The Anaheim Resort. In addition to the specific plans, the City Council also adopted The Anaheim Resort Identity Program and The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program to provide for the The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) streetscape elements and landscape plans that will be implemented in public rights -of -way within The Anaheim Resort. 1-3 1.0 Executive Summary The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 1.0 Executive Summary PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 1.4-1 1 ARSP/The Anaheim Resort Boundaries LEGEND MAP FEATURES The Anaheim Resort Boundary The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (92-2( The Anaheim Resort I— Specific Plan Boundary The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (92-1( J City Boundary ` Hotel Circle Specific Plan (93-11 1-4 Notes/Sources Cry Legal Lot Data, 2022 City Boundary Dula. 2022 0 750 1,500 n Feet w The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 1.4.1 The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan On June 29, 1993, the City of Anaheim approved The Disneyland Resort Project and adopted The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (SP 92-1) to provide for the development of an international multi -day vacation destination resort encompassing approximately 489.7 acres of The Anaheim Resort. The Disneyland Resort Project provides for and the DRSP permits the development of new theme park uses, additional hotels and entertainment areas, new parking facilities, and an internal transportation system. In addition, the DRSP permits the existing Disneyland theme park to continue to be modified with new attractions and other improvements. Although they are separate projects, the ARSP and The DRSP have been prepared to complement one another by incorporating similar zoning and development standards, streetscape and signage programs, and infrastructure improvements for the overall enhancement of The Anaheim Resort. In 2021, to allow continued, long-term growth of The Disneyland Resort, Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. proposed DisneylandForward, an update to The Disneyland Resort Project (1) to allow the transfer of theme park, hotel and other retail, dining and entertainment uses, and parking permitted in The Disneyland Resort Project to other areas of the DRSP and properties within ARSP owned or leased by Disney or other subsidiaries of The Walt Disney Company (Disney ARSP Properties, and, collectively with Disney's properties in the DRSP, Disney Property or Disney Properties), and (2) to provide for future administrative review by the City of Disney's development projects within the Specific Plan area and The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area. This proposal did not request an increase in the amount of development square footage or hotel rooms allowed in the 1-5 1.0 Executive Summary DRSP, or the number of hotel rooms allowed in the ARSP. However, it would include an increase of 4,376 theme park -related parking spaces in the ARSP. The proposal allowed theme park square footage to move from the DRSP Theme Park District to the ARSP Theme Park East and West Overlays provided the total theme park square footage does not exceed 6,850,000 square feet and proposal allowed the parking spaces to move from the DRSP Parking District East Parking Area to the adjacent ARSP Parking Overlay, in conjunction with development of a parking facility in the East Parking Area. Any amount of parking spaces constructed in the P Overlay at Manchester Avenue would result in an equivalent amount of potential parking spaces removed from the allotment for the DRSP Parking District, East Parking Area. Refer to Chapter 3 for additional information and Exhibit 1.8-1 (Development Plan) for the location of the Theme Park and Parking Overlays. 1.4.2 The Hotel Circle Specific Plan On August 16, 1994, the City of Anaheim adopted the Hotel Circle Specific Plan (SP 93-1) for the remaining 6.8 acres of The Anaheim Resort. This specific plan allows for the development of up to 969 hotel rooms. All of the parcels within the specific plan area are developed with a total of 818 hotel rooms. 1.5 Implementing the General Plan The Specific Plan implements the City's General Plan by addressing the pertinent goals, policies and objectives of the General Plan. In 1994, when the City adopted the ARSP, the following General Plan policies relevant to development of the Specific Plan were in place: • To maintain and encourage Anaheim's position as a nationally recognized tourist, convention and recreation center; The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH • To increase sales tax yields and further enhance the economic base of the community, thereby lessening the tax burden on real property; • To encourage the development of quality facilities that complement conventions, family entertainment, and recreation within appropriate areas of the community; and, • To maintain the integrity of the Commercial Recreation Area (now referred to as The Anaheim Resort) by permitting only compatible land uses within this designated area. In 2004, the Anaheim City Council adopted a comprehensive update of its General Plan, which continues to incorporate similar goals and policies relevant to the ARSP. A complete discussion of the relationship between the ARSP and the Anaheim General Plan is found in Section 6.0, General Plan Consistency. 1.6 Specific Plan Goals The General Plan is implemented through the following overall goals of the ARSP: • To foster the growth of the City's economic potential by revitalizing The Anaheim Resort; • To treat all landowners and users in The Anaheim Resort fairly, while recognizing the economic and social needs of the entire City; • To ensure that development complements the City's investment in the Anaheim Convention Center and other area resources and interests; • To maintain and enhance existing recreation and convention -oriented land uses; • To protect adjacent residential land uses by buffering them from potential land use WV 1.0 Executive Summary impacts associated with development of The Anaheim Resort; • To maintain or enhance traffic and circulation in and around The Anaheim Resort; • To provide convenient access to all hotel, restaurant, and retail opportunities in The Anaheim Resort to enhance the area -wide tourist experience; • To protect adjacent residential neighborhoods from unnecessary intrusion by vehicles traveling to and from The Anaheim Resort; • To accommodate potential future regional transportation networks into the Plan; • To provide for necessary public infrastructure and services to maximize the development potential of The Anaheim Resort; • To create a coherent, unique resort identity that reinforces The Anaheim Resort's image as a high -quality destination resort; • To establish a high -quality pedestrian environment; • To improve the aesthetic character of The Anaheim Resort by visually defining the boundaries with appropriate landscape treatments; • To enhance the Anaheim Resort area by providing a wider range of attractions, hotel accommodations, restaurants, shopping opportunities, and public parking; • To support the continued reimagination of The Disneyland Resort to meet and exceed evolving guest expectations for immersive entertainment and technological advances in theme park and other resort experiences in the Theme Park Overlays; and • To continue to fulfill the following vision of Walt Disney: "Disneyland will never be completed... It will continue to grow as long as there is imagination left in the world." The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 1.7 The Development Plan The Development Plan establishes the basic framework for land use and development standards, which will govern development of the ARSP area. It defines the permitted uses, development density, building setbacks, building heights, and other design standards that will be complied with by individual property owners and developers when building new or renovating existing projects. 1.7.1 Land Use The land uses permitted within the ARSP area will be consistent with the overall goal of maximizing the area's potential, while establishing an overall identity. The primary intent is to provide for the needs of visitors to the area's attractions. Consequently, the permitted uses are primarily those that, by their nature, are related to tourism and entertainment. The 518.5-acre Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1), which encompasses the entire ARSP area, except the Anaheim Convention Center and the Hilton Anaheim hotel, provides for the development of hotels, motels, convention and conference facilities, as well as restaurants, retail shops, and entertainment uses. Since the uses are oriented towards entertainment, retail uses such as neighborhood shopping centers will not be permitted. In addition, to discourage use of automobiles, drive -through restaurants and other similar uses will not be permitted. The C-R District also includes three properties on approximately 31.5 acres, which are within the Mobilehome Park (MHP) Overlay. The MHP Overlay encompasses two existing mobile home 1-7 1.0 Executive Summary parks and a recreational vehicle (RV) park. The requirements set forth in Chapter 18.14 (Public and Special -Purpose Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code provide development standards, regulations, and procedures to mitigate relocation problems and adverse effects of effects of displacement upon mobilehome owners when a park is converted to another land use. Also located within the C-R District, the 59.3-acre Anaheim Resort Residential (ARR) Overlay allows for conditionally permitted residential uses in conjunction with the development of a full - service hotel having at least 300 hotel rooms and where (i) hotel uses comprise at least half of the site density, (ii) residential uses on the site are fully integrated into the hotel, and (iii) adjacent to public rights -of -way, residential uses are at least two stories or 25 feet above ground level. The 62.8-acre Public Recreation (PR) District (Development Area 2) encompasses the City of Anaheim Convention Center and associated parking complexes, and the 1,600-room Hilton Anaheim hotel. The PR District allows up to 2,158,363 square feet of convention center/meeting space; 100,000 square feet of outdoor programmable space; 2,500 hotel rooms; and 180,000 square feet of commercial space. Development within this district is subject to the requirements of the Public Recreation (PR) Zone. The purpose of the PR Zone, which is set forth in Chapter 18.14 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, is to preserve, regulate and control the orderly use of City -owned property and adjacent private property The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Also located in the C-R District, the Theme Park (TP) Overlay includes the TP East Overlay and TP West Overlay. The TP East Overlay includes one property on approximately 52.6 acres and currently includes the Toy Story surface parking lot associated with The Disneyland Resort. The TP West Overlay includes two properties on approximately 5.15 acres and currently encompasses the existing Pixar Pals Hotel and associated parking structure. The TP Overlays allow for theme park uses in conjunction with hotel and other uses allowed by the C-R District. Also located in the C-R District, the Parking (P) Overlay includes two separate areas one at Manchester Avenue, directly north of the DRSP Parking District East Parking Area, and one at the northeast corner of Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road. The Parking Overlay at Manchester Avenue includes three properties on approximately 14.88 acres. The Parking Overlay at Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road includes eight properties on approximately 10.69 acres. The Parking Overlay allows for parking and limited back -of -house uses, such as administrative offices and other incidental theme park support facilities, such as restrooms and parking facility offices, in conjunction with hotel and other uses allowed by the C-R District. 1.7.2 Development Density Because of the location of the ARSP area in an urban setting, the density at which particular areas are developed is an important planning consideration. In particular, the timing and availability of infrastructure (such as vehicular access, water and sewer capacity, and storm drainage facilities) is the critical determinant for the future development potential of the ARSP area. In addition, proximity to the area's attractions, and the relationship to surrounding land uses was considered. For the allowable development densities within the ARSP area, refer to Section 3.3 of the Land Use Plan. 1-8 1.0 Executive Summary 1.7.3 Development Standards and Guidelines In addition to regulations that will govern development density, the ARSP contains development standards which regulate building mass and setbacks from property lines. The ARSP also contains regulations which define required landscape treatments both within the public right-of-way and in required setbacks, as well as guidelines for site planning, service area design, parking facility design, building appearance, signs, and other landscaping. In recognition of the importance of the Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue corridors to the identity of The Anaheim Resort, the plan establishes special standards and guidelines for the central portion of The Anaheim Resort. This area, known as the Central Core, encompasses lots or parcels in the ARSP area with frontage on Harbor Boulevard between 1-5 and Orangewood Avenue, and on Katella Avenue between Walnut Street and Haster Street/Anaheim Boulevard. 1.7.4 Development Summary The maps and accompanying tables on the following pages summarize the Development Plan for the ARSP. Exhibit 1.7-1 (Development Summary Plan), shows the location of the C-R District (Development Area 1), the PR District (Development Area 2), the Central Core, the Mobilehome Park (MHP) Overlay, the Anaheim Resort Residential (ARR) Overlay, the Theme Park (TP) Overlay, and the Parking (P) Overlay. It is accompanied by Table 1.7-1, which summarizes the Development Plan, and Table 1.7-2, which summarizes the existing and permitted development in the C-R and PR Districts. As shown in Table 1.7-2, the ARSP permits up to 32,500 hotel rooms or hotel room equivalents within the C-R District. There are 11,587 hotel The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) rooms or hotel room equivalents that are currently developed within the ARSP area. For impact analysis, commercial uses are converted to hotel room equivalents on a ratio of 600 square feet of commercial development to one hotel room. The PR District includes the 1,712,004 square foot (so Anaheim Convention Center and the 1,600-room Hilton Anaheim hotel. The PR District allows development of up to 2,158,363 square feet of convention center/meeting space; 100,000 square feet of outdoor programmable space; 2,500 hotel rooms; and 180,000 square feet of commercial space. The TP East Overlay allows development of up to 840,000 square feet of theme park uses allowed under the DRSP as part of The Disneyland Resort Project and up to 3,348 hotel rooms, which are allowed under the Specific Plan. The TP West Overlay allows development of up to 80,000 square feet of theme park uses permitted in the DRSP as part of The Disneyland Resort Project and up to 564 hotel rooms, which are allowed under the ARSP. Any amount of theme park square footage constructed in the TP Overlay would result in an equivalent amount of potential theme park square footage removed from the allotment for the DRSP Theme Park District such that the maximum theme park square footage in the DRSP Theme Park District, DRSP Southeast District, and TP Overlay will not exceed 6,850,000 square feet. The P Overlay at Manchester Avenue allows development of a portion of the parking spaces permitted and allocated to the DRSP Parking District East Parking Area and up to 1,116 hotel rooms, which are allowed under the ARSP. The P Overlay at the northeast corner of Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road allows development of up to 5,700 parking spaces and up to 534 hotel rooms, which are allowed under the ARSP. Any 1-9 1.0 Executive Summary amount of parking spaces constructed in the P Overlay at Manchester Avenue would result in an equivalent amount of potential parking spaces removed from the allotment for the DRSP Parking District, East Parking Area. 1.8 Implementing the Specific Plan The sketches, diagrams, and plans included in the ARSP are intended to convey the overall design intent of the ARSP. As individual properties are developed, additional site planning, design review and approval will be required prior to the issuance of building permits. In order to convey the design intent of the ARSP, the trees and other plants shown in sketches and cross -sections have been drawn to show their sizes at maturity. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Exhibit 1.8-1 1 Development Plan 1.0 Executive Summary 1 � Pve .Yertho�Y..� MOBIIENOME 1� ei►�;4R1C,O.VERIAY - City: of. a EZ Anahe m i' 7l �i-- •— A � lops isney_Icnd D rneipork; 1 r -Cemtos.-Ave- o - - :E .LL WENL IAwK`, City of, II �, L A Ad lure AnaiMrA �. l >�Qa;e Park ` ► \. _. S Kdtelld_Av_e r— � I GDY_BOUNDARY,I I, _J N City of Garden Grove Development Plan LEGEND The Anaheim Resort Boundary '+ The Anaheim Resort i� Specific Plan Boundary J City Boundary P�:-j yr f— Kdtelld A serer o� MAP FEATURES C-R District (Development Area 1) PR District (Development Area 2( /Z.4 Anaheim Resort Residential (ARR) Overlay — Mobilehome Park (MHP) Overlay within the C-R District _ Theme Park (TP) Overlay within the C-R District Parking (P) Overay within the C-R District Central Core 1-10 CWAOUNDARY� — ciiFy of — Orange Nolen/Sources City Legal Lot Data, 2022 City Boundory Data, 2022 0 750 1,500 Feet The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Table 1.8-1 Development Summary 1.0 Executive Summary Districts/Rights-of-way Land Use Approximate Acreage Commercial Recreation (C-R) District Hotel/motel, restaurant and other visitor -serving 518.5 (Development Area 1) uses Public Recreation (PR) District Anaheim Convention Center, hotels, and 62.8 (Development Area 2) accessory uses TOTAL 681.3 Mobile Home Park (MHP) Overlay in Existing mobile homes 31.5 C-R District 59.3 Anaheim Resort Residential (ARR) Allows residential uses in conjunction with a full- Overlay in C-R District service hotel Theme Park (TP) Overlay TP East Overlay Allows theme park uses in conjunction with hotels 52.6 TP West Overlay and other uses allowed by the C-R District 5.15 Parking (P) Overlay Manchester Avenue Allows development of a portion of the parking 14.9 allocated to the Parking District East Parking Area of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and limited back -of -house uses in conjunction with hotels and other uses allowed by the C-R District Harbor Boulevard/Ball Road Allows development of parking and limited back- 10.7 of -house uses in conjunction with hotels and other uses allowed by the C-R District The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Table 1.8-2 Existing and Permitted Development 1.0 Executive Summary Existing Permitted Permitted Development District Development P Development (') After DisneylandForward(') C-R District . 11,587 hotel . 32,625 hotel rooms(2) 32,625 hotel rooms rooms* Public Recreation (PR) . 1,600 hotel rooms • 2,500 hotel rooms • 2,500 hotel rooms District 1,712,004 sf 0 2,118,363 sf convention • 2,118,363 sf convention convention center center center • 180,000 sf commercial • 180,000 sf commercial development development • 40.000 sf of additional • 40,000 sf of additional hotel hotel meeting and meeting and ballroom ballroom space space • 100,000 sf outdoor • 100,000 sf outdoor programmable space programmable space Theme Park (TP) Overlay(3) TP East Overlay Temporary surface • 3,348 hotel rooms • Temporary surface parking parking facilities facilities (4,635 spaces) or 3,348 hotel rooms, 840,000 sf of theme park uses TP West Overlay 489 hotel rooms, 564 hotel rooms 564 hotel rooms, 17,619 sf of 80,000 sf of theme ancillary park uses commercial uses. Parking (P) Overlay(4) Manchester Avenue Temporary surface 1,116 hotel rooms • Temporary surface parking parking facilities facilities (1,261 spaces), (1,261 spaces), approximately 67,424 sf approximately office building 67,424 sf office or building 1,116 hotel rooms, development of a portion of the parking spaces 1-12 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 1.0 Executive Summary Existing Permitted Permitted Development District Development t+) After p Development DisneylandForward(') allocated to the East Parking Area of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Harbor Boulevard/ . Surface parking . 534 hotel rooms Temporary surface parking Ball Road facilities facilities and (1,324 (1,324 spaces) spaces) or 534 hotel rooms, 5,700 parking spaces Notes: (1) Commercial uses are converted to hotel room equivalents as allowed by Section 7.0 of the Specific Plan, on a ratio of 600 square feet (so of commercial development = 1 hotel room. (2) As of adoption of Ordinance No. 6494 approving Amendment No. 16 to the ARSP. (3) The total amount of theme park uses developed in the TP Overlay will reduce the potential amount of theme park uses in the DRSP Theme Park District such that the maximum theme park space footage in the DRSP Theme Park and Southeast Districts and the ARSP TP Overlay shall not exceed 6,850,000 square feet. The amount of restaurant sf in the TP East Overlay shall be further limited to up to 20 percent of the allotted theme park square footage in the Overlay. (4) For any square footage for back -of -house uses or limited retail, dining and entertainment uses, the traffic generation characteristics of said uses shall not exceed those associated with the otherwise permitted hotel/motel (including accessory uses) density as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager prior to approval of building plans. Further, the proposed development shall not result in infrastructure impacts greater than those associated with the property's permitted hotel/motel density, unless such impacts are duly analyzed and mitigated pursuant to subsequent environmental review (such impacts shall be determined through a sewer and traffic impact analysis to be submitted to the City Engineer). Additional infrastructure studies may be required as determined by the Planning Director. 1-13 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) This page is intentionally blank. 1-14 1.0 Executive Summary The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 2.0 Planning Context PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 2.0 PLANNING CONTENT 2.2 Specific Plan Policies 2.1 Purpose of the Specific Plan The Anaheim Resort, containing theme parks, convention facilities and visitor -serving uses such as hotels, is a unique type of land use concentration that requires special consideration and attention to ensure that the various elements come together to create an exciting, attractive environment. The unique synergy a destination resort must have is not easily addressed by traditional zoning. As a result, it is necessary to establish a basic framework, which provides planning policies and standards to assure that visitor -serving facilities and theme park uses will come together as an integrated whole. The ARSP is intended to establish this framework, thereby ensuring an attractive destination resort environment. In addition to overall planning policies, the ARSP establishes comprehensive zoning regulations and design guidelines, which recognize the distinctive nature of tourist and convention - oriented uses, and effectively implements the policies of the ARSP. It also identifies the public facilities and services that will be needed to support the development and describes how the project and its related improvements will be phased. The zoning regulations contained within this specific plan in Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards, are regulatory in nature. Subsequent development plans and subdivision maps must be consistent with both the ARSP and the City of Anaheim General Plan. Any situation or condition not specifically covered by provisions contained within this specific plan will be subject to the regulations of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. 2-1 The specific plan goals stated in Section 1.6 define the basis for the following specific plan policies. They include: • Enhance the urban destination area and create a resort development; • Establish a unified resort identity; • Supply adequate visitor and convention facilities to meet the long-term demand for entertainment, convention, lodging, and retail uses; • Improve public facilities, services and infrastructure to accommodate projected growth; • Improve the transportation system; • Develop implementation measures to assure that the area will be enhanced by high quality development; and • Protect and enhance surrounding uses. The following subsections describe these policies in more detail. 2.2.1 Create and Enhance an Urban Destination Resort Environment The primary planning policy for the ARSP is to enhance an urban destination area and create a resort environment that features the Anaheim Convention Center, hotels, restaurants, theme park attractions, and shopping and entertainment opportunities. By enhancing this area, visitors will be encouraged to stay for several days, and enjoy the variety of recreation and entertainment opportunities available. 2.2.2 Establish a Unified Resort Identity In order to establish the identity of The Anaheim Resort as a premiere destination resort, the ARSP proposes that a unifying theme be established throughout the ARSP area. This will The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) be achieved by establishing a consistent visual language for the public areas that extend throughout the ARSP area. The main components of the unifying visual language will be: architectural character and quality of the buildings, landscape, signage, and street furnishings. The architectural character and quality of the buildings proposed will be regulated through a combination of setback requirements contained in Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards, and design guidelines contained in Section 5.0, Design Plan, of this specific plan. The landscape character of the ARSP will be created primarily by extensive planting of trees, shrubs and ground cover. Similarly, signage within the ARSP area will present a unified visual character through the use of compatible and complimentary colors, forms, and typography. Street furnishings, including lighting fixtures, benches, pageantry, and entry statements will also be selected to reinforce the overall identity of The Anaheim Resort. 2.2.3 Supply Visitor and Convention Facilities to Meet Long -Term Demand Another important specific plan policy is to supply the visitor and convention facilities that will be needed to meet the long-term demand for recreation, convention, and visitor -serving activities. There are three primary types of facilities needed to achieve this that are addressed by this plan: hotels, convention facilities and visitor -serving retail and entertainment facilities. • First, the ARSP provides for the development of up to 32,625 hotel rooms within the Commercial Recreation (C-R) District. • Second, the ARSP provides for the ongoing operation and expansion of the Anaheim Convention Center, the largest convention 2-2 2.0 Planning Context facility on the West Coast, and uses supportive of this important facility. • Third, the ARSP also provides for visitor - serving retail and entertainment facilities within the ARSP area. 2.2.4 Improve Public Facilities, Services and Infrastructure to Accommodate Growth Another important specific plan objective is to improve public facilities, services, and infrastructure to accommodate the growth and development that is planned to occur within the ARSP area. The public facility components to be improved as a result of the ARSP include: the transportation infrastructure (described in Section 4.0, Public Facilities Plan), and the pedestrian environment and the streetscape (described in Section 5.0, Design Plan). The ARSP is designed to create an inviting, integrated pedestrian environment that provides convenient connections throughout the ARSP area and the adjacent Disneyland Resort. Important elements of the pedestrian environment are the landscaped parkways and pedestrian facilities that are provided throughout the area. The ARSP includes streetscape improvements that are compatible with those in the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and which contribute to a unifying visual character for the entire Anaheim Resort. Improvements to underground infrastructure, including the storm drainage, water supply, electrical and sewerage systems and enhanced public services are also provided. 2.2.5 Improve the Transportation System An essential part of the specific plan is to identify improvements to the transportation system so that access to the ARSP area will be improved. These improvements include a combination of new access routes to and from 1-5 and local roadway improvements. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT The ARSP area can also be easily accessed by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) bus lines and Anaheim Resort Transportation, both of which provide connections from nearby Metrolink/Amtrak and future high-speed rail stations, including ARTIC (Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center), a multimodal transportation facility. Day visitors to the ARSP area will have convenient access to and from two new public day -use parking facilities (described in more detail in The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan). These facilities will have a maximum capacity of 34,300 cars and will accommodate Anaheim Convention Center, as well as theme park visitors. Access from the parking facilities to the Anaheim Convention Center will be by shuttle bus or via the pedestrian walkway system. Overnight visitors arriving by 1-5 may use the same interchanges as day visitors but will be directed to surface streets for access to hotels or other facilities within The Anaheim Resort. These facilities will complement those proposed within the adopted Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, which includes high -capacity public parking facilities, pedestrian walkways, transportation system(s), and pedestrian bridges . 2.2.6 Develop Implementation Mechanisms to Assure Quality Development To assure the overall quality of the ARSP area, the ARSP contains implementation mechanisms that promote the design goals of the Plan. These mechanisms include development regulations, standards, and design guidelines, as well as a public facilities plan. Section 5.0, Design Plan, describes the design concepts that will be implemented to provide a unified identity. The City has also adopted an Identity Program for The Anaheim Resort that has been developed in 2-3 2.0 Planning Context conjunction with this specific plan and which is also described in Section 5.0. The zoning and development standards are contained within Section 7 .0, Zoning and Development Standards. They define the permitted uses and establish setback standards, among other things. 2.2.7 Enhance and Protect Surrounding Uses Implementation of the ARSP will enhance and protect the surrounding uses through the following means. First, development setback areas are created and maintained to provide an aesthetically appealing, landscaped buffer between the development in the ARSP area and neighboring uses. Second, development in the ARSP will incorporate 360-degree architecture for Disney ARSP Properties to protect and improve public views into the Specific Plan area. Third, convenient access to the public parking facilities from Interstate 5 minimizes the use of local streets by visitors to the ARSP area. As a fully integrated planning document, the ARSP provides the overall policy direction (in this Section, Section 3.0, Land Use Plan, and Section 4.0, Public Facilities Plan) as well as the particular planning tools (Section 5.0, Design Plan, and Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards) needed to ensure that these goals are achieved as development of the ARSP area proceeds. 2.3 Authority and Scope of the Specific Plan The City of Anaheim's authority to prepare, adopt, and implement specific plans is assured by California Government Code, Article 8 Specific Plans, Section 65450 through Section 65457. Procedures for the adoption, implementation, and amendment of specific plans are provided in Chapter 18.72 Specific Plans, of the Anaheim Municipal Code. The The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Planning Commission must hold a public hearing before it can recommend the adoption of a specific plan by the City Council. The City Council may then adopt the specific plan by ordinance. As required by Chapter 18.72 of the Anaheim Municipal Code and California Government Code Sections 65450 et. seq., this document and the associated environmental impact reports that have been prepared for the ARSP, Master Environmental Impact Report No. 313 (MEIR No. 313), Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 340 (SEIR No. 340), and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 352 (SEIR No. 352) specify the following in detail: • The nature, location, density and size of all existing and proposed land uses, including open space. • Vehicular and pedestrian circulation within the project and surrounding area. • The provision of essential urban services including, but not limited to, energy, public safety, public utilities, sewage, solid waste disposal, storm water drainage, water, recreation and other essential facilities which may be needed to support proposed development. • Land use and other regulations that will implement the specific plan. • Programs, public works projects, and financing measures to implement the specific plan. • A statement of the relationship of the specific plan to the General Plan. Chapter 18.72 also requires a development schedule setting forth phasing of development and target dates for completion. The ARSP is intended to provide guidelines and regulations for 2-4 2.0 Planning Context the future development of the ARSP area and does not contain any proposals for specific developments other than the Public Facilities Plan. As such, it does not contain a phasing plan, which establishes a precise sequence, time, and level of development. Development of the ARSP area will likely be spread over a number of years as individual landowners renovate their property, or replace existing buildings with new ones. SEIR No. 340 has assumed thresholds of development for modeling purposes in Year 2030 and contains mitigation measures to ensure that infrastructure improvements will be required commensurate with development. For the Disneyland Forward project, SEIR No. 352 has assumed for purposes of analysis that Disney would implement the Project over the next decades depending on market conditions and contains mitigations measures to ensure that infrastructure improvements will be required commensurate with development. In addition, this document addresses subjects, such as urban design, which are necessary and desirable for implementation of the General Plan. Further, this document provides information that specifies how the proposed ARSP is in conformance with the following findings, which the Planning Commission and the City Council are required to make prior to approving or amending a specific plan: • That the property proposed for the specific plan has unique site characteristics such as topography, location or surroundings which are enhanced by special land use and development standards; • That the specific plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and with the purposes, standards and land use guidelines therein; The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) • That the specific plan results in development of desirable character, which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood; • That the specific plan contributes to a balance of land uses; and, • That the specific plan respects environmental and aesthetic resources consistent with economic realities. 2.4 Relationship to City Planning Documents and Regulations This section describes the relationship of the ARSP to other relevant City planning documents and regulations. 2.4.1 Relationship to the General Plan As previously mentioned, the ARSP is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. Section 6.0, General Plan Consistency, includes a discussion of each of the applicable General Plan Element's goals and policies, and how they are implemented through the ARSP. 2.4.2 Relationship to the Zoning Ordinance The ARSP defines zoning districts, regulations, and development standards that will apply to the ARSP area. In cases where the ARSP does not address a particular situation, the regulations and development standards contained within Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code will apply. To the extent the two differ, the ARSP's policies, design guidelines, regulations, and development standards will apply. 2-5 2.0 Planning Context 2.4.3 California Environmental Quality Act Requirements The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that local agencies, prior to taking action on projects over which they have discretionary approval authority, consider the environmental consequences of such projects. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is a public document designed to provide the public, responsible/trustee agencies, special districts, and local and State government agency decision - makers with an analysis of the potential environmental consequences of project implementation in order to support an informed decision. Pursuant to local and State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Anaheim certified The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR No. 313 (State Clearinghouse No. 91091062) in support of the adoption of The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 in September 1994. Master EIR No. 313 evaluated impacts associated with the establishment and implementation of the ARSP and created a Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP No. 0085) in order to mitigate impacts associated with ARSP area development. Since being certified in 1994, two Validation Reports have been prepared (1999 and 2004) to evaluate the continued relevance and accuracy of Master EIR No. 313 and its ability to be used as a Master EIR for all projected development within the boundaries of the ARSP area. In December 2012, the City certified Supplemental EIR No. 340 to reevaluate all the environmental changes that have occurred in and around The Anaheim Resort and to evaluate an expansion of the Convention Center. Since being certified in 2012, one Validation Report has been prepared (2019) to evaluate the continued relevance and accuracy of SEIR No. 340 and its ability to be used as a Master EIR for all projected The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 2.0 Planning Context PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) development within the boundaries of the ARSP area. In 2021, to allow continued, long-term growth of The Disneyland Resort, Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. (Disney) proposed Disneyland Forward, an update to The Disneyland Resort Project (1) to allow the transfer of uses permitted under the Disneyland Resort Project to other areas of the DRSP and Disney ARSP Properties (Disney's Properties in the DRSP and Disney ARSP Properties are collectively referred to as "Disney Property" or "Disney Properties") and (2) to provide for future administrative review by the City of Disney's development projects on Disney Properties. Pursuant to local and State CEQA Guidelines, the City of Anaheim prepared an Initial Study which determined that certain potentially significant environmental impacts might be associated with development of the DisneylandForward project. As a result, the City prepared Subsequent EIR No. 352 (under separate cover) which identifies impacts which may result from the development of Disneyland Forward and includes recommended mitigation measures to lessen these impacts. The City Council certified the Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 for Disneyland Forward on [insert date] and created a Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP No. 387) in order to mitigate impacts associated with Disneyland Forward development. SEIR No. 352 also provides the environmental analysis required for the addition of theme park uses in the ARSP Theme Park East and ARSP Theme Park West Overlays and the additional of parking uses in the ARSP Parking Overlays. For non -Disney properties located in the DRSP and the ARSP, EIR No. 311 and SEIR No. 340, including the associated Mitigation Monitoring Plans, would continue to apply to future development. In addition to addressing the potential environmental impacts that would result from the ARSP Update and the Anaheim Convention M Center Expansion, Supplemental EIR No. 340 serves as the primary environmental document for all future entitlements associated with the ARSP, including all discretionary approvals requested or required to implement the ARSP. For the Disneyland Forward Project, Supplemental EIR No. 352 serves as an additional environmental document for all future development associated with Disney Properties. 2.4.4 Relationship to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan The City of Anaheim adopted The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 92-1) and certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 311 on June 29, 1993. The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan provides for the development of an international multi -day vacation destination resort encompassing approximately 489.7 acres of The Anaheim Resort. The Plan permits the development of new theme parks, additional hotels and entertainment areas, new parking facilities, and an internal transportation system. In addition, the Plan permits the existing Disneyland and Disney California Adventure theme parks to continue to be modified with new attractions and other improvements. In 2021, to allow continued, long-term of The Disneyland Resort, Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. proposed Disneyland Forward, an update to The Disneyland Resort Project. The Disneyland Resort Project included updates to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan to allow the transfer of theme park, hotel and other retail, dining and entertainment uses, and parking permitted in The Disneyland Resort Project and to provide future streamlined review by the City of Disney's development projects. The City Council certified the Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 for Disneyland Forward on [insert date], which included environmental review for The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 2.0 Planning Context PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) development in the Southeast District as envisioned by EIR No. 311. Although they are separate projects, preparation of the ARSP and The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan were coordinated to ensure planning consis- tency, and to ensure that elements of the plans are complementary (for example, definition of planning area boundaries, the design of the streetscape improvements and the provision of adequate infrastructure). Where appropriate, references or descriptions of the programs proposed as part of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan are included within this document in order to provide the reader with a better understanding of the relationship between the planning concepts and programs proposed as part of each of the two Specific Plans. 2.4.5 Relationship to the Hotel Circle Specific Plan On August 16, 1994, the City of Anaheim adopted the Hotel Circle Specific Plan (SP 93-1) for the remaining 6.8 acres of The Anaheim Resort. This specific plan allows for the development of up to 969 hotel rooms. All of the parcels within the specific plan area are developed with a total of 818 hotel rooms. 2-7 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) This page is intentionally blank. 2-8 2.0 Planning Context The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 3.0 Land Use Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 3.0 LAND USE PLAN 3.1 Regional Location The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) area is located in the City of Anaheim, which is 35 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles and 7 miles northwest of Santa Ana, in Central Orange County, California. Exhibit 3.1-1 (Regional Location Map) shows the regional location of the ARSP area. The ARSP area is generally located southwest of the 1-5 corridor, south of Vermont Avenue, east of Walnut Avenue, and north of Chapman Avenue. Exhibit 3.1-1 Regional Location Map s Po_wden _ _ -t� � k� 1 -- 3.2 Existing Conditions This Section contains a description of the ARSP area and other relevant existing conditions. 3.2.1 The Specific Plan Area The ARSP area is located within The Anaheim Resort, an area designated by the City of Anaheim General Plan for recreation and tourist/convention-related activities along with related visitor -serving uses. The Anaheim Resort itself contains approximately 1,078 acres. Exhibit 3.2-1 (ARSP/The Anaheim Resort Boundaries) shows the location of the ARSP area within The Anaheim Resort. Harbor Boulevard, West Street/Disneyland Drive, and Haster Street are the main north -south thoroughfares through the project area. Katella Avenue, Ball Road, and Orangewood Avenue are the main east -west thoroughfares. 1-5 also crosses through the ARSP area. 3.2.2 Existing Uses The current uses within the ARSP area include a variety of commercial, retail, hotel/motel, and visitor- and convention -serving uses. In addition, some nonconforming uses such as mobile home parks, and industrial and office facilities are located in the ARSP area. The Anaheim Convention Center is located on the south side of Katella Avenue, west of Harbor Boulevard. Residential neighborhoods consisting of single- family homes and multiple -family dwelling units are located south and west of the Anaheim Convention Center and around the periphery of The Anaheim Resort. Exhibit 3.2-2 (Aerial Photograph with the ARSP and The Anaheim Resort Boundaries) is an aerial photograph of The Anaheim Resort. The limits of ARSP area are also identified. 3-1 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 3.0 Land Use Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 3.2-1 1 ARSP/ The Anaheim Resort Boundaries -Cerritos Ave Clty of, Anaheim Katelld Ave 71 C[TY-BOUNDARY _ - � J City of Garden Grove ve�rt;gle 4 city„of -Anaheim j 7z n?r s m`. �t c� or _Certito4 Ave 3 o; m' yl� Orangewood Q,vg Otelld:Ave l _ City, of I — r Orange (_.Chapman Ave "L 1 — ARSP/The Anaheim Resort Boundaries LEGEND The Anaheim Resort L — Boundary MAP FEATURES Notes/sources The Anaheim Resort City regal tat Data. 2022 _ Specific Plan (92-2) City Boundary Data. 2022 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Boundary The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (92-1) C J City Boundary _ Hotel Circle Specific Plan (93-1) 0 750 1,500 Feet MARCH 2O24 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 3.0 Land Use Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 3.2-2 1 Aerial Photograph with the ARSP and The Anaheim Resort Boundaries Aerial Photograph with the ARSP and The Anaheim Resort Boundaries LEGEND f�l The Anaheim Resort 1� J Boundary The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Boundary J City Boundary Nat -/Sources City legal Lot Data, 2022 City Boundary Data, 2022 0 750 1.500 O Feet 3-3 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 3.3 Land Use Plan This section contains a description of the land use plan for the ARSP. In particular, it estab- lishes the general policies that will govern land use within the ARSP area. Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards, contains specific, detailed zoning and development standards, which are based on the policies described herein. The land use plan is based on three major factors that will govern land use within the ARSP area. For each of these three factors, the ARSP provides a background rationale for the proposed land use regulations, as well as a description of the basic land use policies. They are: • The land uses permitted in the Commercial Recreation (C-R) and Public Recreation (PR) Districts as well as in the Mobilehome Park (MHP) Overlay, the Anaheim Resort Residential (ARR) Overlay, the Theme Park (TP) Overlay, and the Parking (P) Overlay; • The maximum development density permitted in the C-R District; and, • The types of development standards that will apply to development. Exhibit 3.3-1 (Development Summary Plan) for the ARSP, which shows the location of the C-R and PR Districts, the Central Core, and the MHP, ARR, TP, and P Overlays. Further information regarding development densities permitted within these development areas are depicted on the maps on the following pages of the Land Use Plan. 3.3.1 Land Use As implied in its name, The Anaheim Resort is intended for land uses with a commercial and/or recreational emphasis. The presence of the Anaheim Convention Center, the Disneyland Theme Park and Disney's California Adventure Theme Park has established The Anaheim 3.0 Land Use Plan Resort as an important regional, as well as national and international destination. In the future, other similar attractions may be developed in The Anaheim Resort. As a result, visitors to The Anaheim Resort require many types of goods and services in order to make their visits safe, convenient and enjoyable. Among the most common visitor requirements are food and lodging. Consequently, in the majority of the 518.5-acre C-R District, hotels, motels and restaurants are permitted uses. In addition, many service and retail businesses intended to accommodate visitors, such as barber or beauty shops, travel agencies, automobile rental agencies, and specialty retail shops, will also be permitted when integrated within a hotel/motel development. Those uses which are consistent with the overall intent of the ARSP, but which may require special consider- ation in order to assure compatibility with surrounding uses will require conditional use permits. The 1.8 million square foot Anaheim Convention Center, one of the major visitor destinations in The Anaheim Resort, and the existing 1,600- room Hilton Anaheim hotel are located in the 62.8-acre PR District (Development Area 2). Development within the PR District is subject to the requirements of the PR (Public Recreational) Zone, which is intended to preserve, regulate, and control the orderly use of City -owned properties such as Convention Center complexes and adjacent private properties. Other related visitor -serving uses allowed in the District as accessory uses are concession stands, restaurants, and shops. As part of Disneyland Forward, which amends The Disneyland Resort Project, theme park uses were introduced in the ARSP area within the TP Overlay. The TP Overlay encompasses approximately 57.75 acres and accommodates 3-4 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) up to 920,000 square feet of theme park uses already approved in the DRSP as part of The Disneyland Resort Project and up to 3,912 hotel rooms which are allowed under the Specific Plan. The intent of the TP West Overlay is to allow development of theme park uses on ARSP properties concurrently with the development of theme park uses in the DRSP Theme Park District. The intent of the TP East Overlay is to allow development of theme park uses on ARSP properties concurrently with the development of theme park uses in the DRSP Southeast District. Any amount of theme park square footage constructed in the TP Overlay will result in an equivalent amount of potential theme park square footage removed from the allotment for the DRSP Theme Park District such that the maximum theme park square footage in the DRSP Theme Park District, DRSP Southeast District, and TP Overlay will not exceed 6,850,000 square feet. As part of Disneyland Forward, the P Overlay was introduced in the ARSP to permit parking spaces for theme park uses, a limited amount of back -of - house uses such as supporting office space, a limited amount of retail and dining such as kiosks along pedestrian pathways within the P Overlay, and up to 1,650 hotel rooms which are allowed under the Specific Plan. The P Overlay encompasses 25.57 acres. The P Overlay along Manchester Avenue north of the East Parking Area of the DRSP Parking District allows development of a portion of the number of parking spaces approved for the East Parking Area as part of The Disneyland Resort Project. The intent of the P Overlay is to allow development of these parking spaces concurrently with the development of parking facilities in the East Parking Area. The P Overlay also allows development of up to 5,700 parking spaces at the Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road properties. 3.0 Land Use Plan Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards, contains a complete list of all the permitted primary uses, as well as accessory uses, conditional uses, and prohibited uses. 3-5 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 3.0 Land Use Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 3.3-1 1 Development Plan �fAtaI0 kL/AIA pNFRL o , ' , v d7� L�_.. Disneyland; K'"IiAtiglia Theme: Farb; _Cerritos Ave_ �I� rNchr[ PA♦fR wssr City of e I i '1 aheim El) L `1 C%ema�Q Anr" 1 Katella Ave I ��- y bnrbnflon �� Eenter `O I CITY BOUNDARY, V ei rnr f" l�_ 1 Cify'oft nd Aheim \, +) X. 1 N�, I.as =_; r � >I -_ ` —:. . •� :Cerritos Ave r� �. �1 ♦ r �� Kafella.f ` a o, @s, 9` Orangewood`AGe "� � Ctty of � r— � � CITY BOUNDARY Garden Grove I - City of El— — — r Orange — — Chapman;Ave — --..—, Development Plan LEGEND MAP FEATURES Notes/sources The Ancheim Resort C-R District Mobilehome Park (MHP) GlyBouyLzalLot Data.2o22 Boundary (Development Area 1) Illlllliii0 Overlay within the C-R District Gnaary Dalo. D22 -� The Anaheim Resort PR District Theme Park (TP) Overlay I_ r Specific Plan Boundary (Development Area 2) within the C-R District City Boundary /�� Anaheim Resort Parking (P) Overlay C J Residential (ARR) within the C-R District Overlay _ i Central Core o Aso s,sooFeet �.J %) �� MARCH 2O24 3-6 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 3.0 Land Use Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2024) 3.3.2 Commercial Recreation (C-R) District Development Density The ARSP establishes seven density designations in the C-R District (Development Area 1) that will help assure that development of the area will be compatible with proposed infrastructure and with the goal to protect surrounding residential uses. These density designations are based upon hotel/motel development and allow up to 20% of each hotel/motel project gross square footage, excluding parking facilities, to be developed with integrated (i.e., included within the main hotel/motel complex) accessory uses. These accessory uses will reduce the otherwise maximum permitted hotel/motel density at the rate of one hotel/motel room per six hundred (600) gross square feet of accessory use. For properties proposed to be developed with permitted and conditionally permitted uses other than hotels/motels with accessory uses, the traffic generation characteristics of said uses shall not exceed those associated with the other- wise permitted hotel/motel (including accessory uses) density as determined by the Planning Director or designee prior to Final Site Plan review and approval. The seven density categories established by the plan are: • Low Density (up to 50 hotel rooms/acre); • Low -Medium Density (up to 75 hotel rooms/acre); • Low -Medium Density (Modified) (up to 252 hotel rooms and 75,593 square feet of accessory uses); • Medium Density (up to 100 hotel rooms/acre); • Medium Density (Modified) (up to 345 hotel rooms); • Medium Density (Modified A) (up to 127 hotel rooms); and, • Convention Center Medium Density (up to 125 hotel rooms/acre provided the trip generation characteristics are equivalent to 100 hotel rooms/acre). Exhibit 3.3-2 (C-R District Development Density Plan), identifies the location of each density designation within the C-R District. The areas with the Low Density designation are generally located where planned future infrastructure improvements will not support more intense development, or which are located further from the area's attractions. Areas with the Low - Medium and Medium Density designations are located where planned future infrastructure will be sufficient to accommodate these more intense levels of development, and which are located closer to the main attractions of The Anaheim Resort. Areas immediately adjacent to the Anaheim Convention Center have the Convention Center Medium designation in recognition that guests at these hotels typically do not have automobiles and, therefore, place fewer demands on area streets, one of the most important infrastructure factors that tend to limit development density. In addition, the Low Medium (Modified) density designation allows 252 hotel rooms and 75,593 square feet of commercial uses, which is equivalent to 378 hotel rooms, at the southeast corner of Katella Avenue and Harbor Boulevard, the Medium Density (Modified) density designation allows up to 345 hotel rooms or its equivalent on South Manchester Avenue and the Medium Density (Modified A) density designation allows up to 127 hotel rooms on Clementine Street. In recognition of the extensive existing development within The Anaheim Resort, the ARSP contains provisions, which permit existing hotels/motels to renovate or rebuild at the density existing on the date of adoption of the ARSP, even if the density exceeds the maximum WA The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) permitted by the density category in which the property is located. The C-R District also encompasses properties that have a Mobile Home Park (MHP) Overlay designation, an Anaheim Resort Residential (ARR) Overlay designation, a Theme Park (TP) Overlay designation, and a Parking (P) Overlay designation. 3.0 Land Use Plan 3-8 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 3.0 Land Use Plan Exhibit 3.3-2 1 Commercial Recreation (C-R) District Development Density Plan \� �eiino�f pve: L \ a 1f ` City of, �1r N Anaheim Ball. Rtl' _ '��, pry = L'.S �(l i )Q —. 8all'Rci 7, 1 r �1 Drsneyiand IF rh eme l ark 1f.�Magie�Way" �% Cerritos Ave- r ',0, - r�♦ C.Mtos-Ave l4Lj - '� J 4 r m City, of i rDisne CI Of � • CA�Adventuie� II Anaheim + II Therne„Park` D 177 rIL Katella Ave L Imo` K_a`tella A\ - i 4 CDVBOUND'ARY ,_I —. - ---- I Orangewood Ave'- � wi i-' _ City of CRY_BOUNDARY' ��' tr=—� Garden Grove 1_ I i I -- _ _ I - } City of _II — Orange — CHapman Ave — -� Commercial Recreation (C-R) District Development Density Plan LEGEND MAP FEATURES r—, The Anaheim Low Density Medium Density (Modified) ss Ace 75 Rooms Up 10 345 Hotel Rooms to 50 HotelwhiR L_ Resort Boundary or perei s The Anaheim Low -Medium Density Medium Density (Modified A) "` Up to 75 Hotel Rooms/Cross Acre or 75 Rooms _ Resort S ecific P per parcel, whichever is greater Up to 127 Hotel Rooms Plan Boundary Low -Medium Density (Modified) ♦ Convention Center Medium Up l0 125 Hotel Rooms/Goss Acre 75 C City Boundary Up to 252 Hotel Room vrith 75.593 squa a feet of \\\� or accessory uses rooms per parcel. whichever is greater'• Medium Density perlporo eHwhkhe msfGross Acre or 75 Rooms '\'\` greater Notes/Soraces City Legal Lot Data, 2022 Q1Y Boundary Dal.. 2D22 --With trip generation characteristics mitigated to the equivalent of 100 rooms per gross acre. 0 750 1,500 Feet 0 MARCH 2O24 3-9 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 3.3.3 Mobilehome Park (MHP) Overlay The C-R District includes three properties on approximately 31.5 acres, which have a Mobilehome Park (MHP) Overlay designation. The MHP Overlay encompasses two existing mobilehome parks and a recreational vehicle (RV) Park. The properties within the MHP Overlay are subject to the requirements set forth in Chapter 18.26 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, which provides development standards, regulations, and procedures to mitigate relocation problems and adverse effects of displacement upon mobilehome owners when a park is converted to another land use. Exhibit 3.3-3 (Mobilehome Park (MHP) Overlay in the C-R District) identifies the parcels that are subject to the MHP Overlay in the C-R District. 3.3.4 Anaheim Resort Residential (ARR) Overlay The Anaheim Resort Residential (ARR) Overlay, which is located on 59.3 acres within the C-R District, allows for conditionally permitted residential uses in conjunction with the development of a full service hotel having at least 300 hotel rooms and where (i) hotel uses comprise at least half of the site density, (ii) residential uses on the site are fully integrated into the hotel, and (iii) adjacent to public rights -of - way, residential uses are at least two stories or 25 feet above ground level. Exhibit 3.3-4 (Anaheim Resort Residential (ARR) Overlay in the C-R District) identifies the parcels that are subject to the ARR Overlay in the C-R District. 3.3.5 Public Recreation (PR) District Development Density The 62.8-acre Public Recreation (PR) District (Development Area 2) encompasses the Anaheim Convention Center and associated parking complexes, and the 1,600-room Hilton Anaheim hotel. Development within the PR District can include up to 2,158,363 square feet 3.0 Land Use Plan of convention center/meeting space; 100,000 square feet of outdoor programmable space; 2,500 hotel rooms; and 180,000 square feet of commercial space. Development within this district is subject to the requirements of the Public Recreational (PR) Zone. The purpose of the PR Zone, which is set forth in Chapter 18.14 (Public and Special -Purpose Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code, is to preserve, regulate and control the orderly use of City -owned property and adjacent private property. Exhibit 3.3-5 (Public Recreation (PR) District) identifies the parcels that are subject to the PR District. 3.3.6 Theme Park (TP) Overlay The TP Overlay includes the TP East Overlay and TP West Overlay, which are located within the C-R District. The TP East Overlay includes approximately 52.6 acres and currently includes the Toy Story surface parking lot associated with The Disneyland Resort. The TP East Overlay allows development of up to 840,000 square feet of theme park uses permitted in the DRSP as part of The Disneyland Resort Project and up to 3,348 hotel rooms, which are allowed under the ARSP. The TP West Overlay includes approximately 5.15 acres and currently encompasses the existing Pixar Pals Hotel and associated parking structure. The TP West Overlay allows development of up to 80,000 square feet of theme park uses permitted in the DRSP as part of The Disneyland Resort Project and up to 564 hotel rooms, which are allowed under the ARSP. Exhibit 3.3-6 (Theme Park (TP) Overlay in the C-R District) identifies the parcels that are subject to the TP Overlay. 3.3.7 Parking (P) Overlay The Overlay includes two separate areas, one along Manchester Avenue, immediately north of the DRSP Parking District East Parking Area, and one at the northeast corner of Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road, both of which are 3-10 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT located in the C-R District. The P Overlay at Manchester Avenue includes three properties on approximately 14.88 acres and allows development of a portion of the parking spaces permitted and allocated to the DRSP Parking District East Parking Area and up to 1,116 hotel rooms, which are permitted under the ARSP. The P Overlay at Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road includes five properties on approximately 10.69 acres and allows up to 5,700 parking spaces and development of up to 534 hotel rooms, which are permitted under the ARSP. Exhibit 3.3-7 (Parking P Overlay in the C-R District) identifies the parcels that are subject to the P Overlay. 3.0 Land Use Plan 3-11 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH Exhibit 3.3-3 1 Mobilehome Park (MHP) Overlay in the C-R District 3.0 Land Use Plan ♦ � gve 1 11��♦_ � lt� City, of, Anaheim Ball _Rc]' 'o Ball, Rd, S' rm' Drsnaylcgd A ♦ c r ` I STlserii'e`:garla �ytoglc„1GJ,aya � r♦ r VP ;Cerritos _Ave 1 O� _• ++ 6 (f - �`�r-o _ Cerritgs_Ave 00 City of �,1 "� CI1,Ailvs fne ure Dhne, NL Y �W - f I �� w Anaheim ,.� l TlemePaik; 1 03-k\. Katella Ave T )Catella A eearN � I � NC cm r _� BOUNDARY I Orangewood Ave N. Ct of L'� I Cln'BOUNDARY; Garden Grove (( I— _ _ 1 -- I City of IOrange .Chapman Ave L e — Mobilehome Park (MHP) Overlay In C-R District LEGEND MAP FEATURES Notes/sau.*s �Parcels subject to the Mobilehome Park City Legal Lot Data. 2022-j The Anaheim Resort Boundary Overlay Zone in the C-R District City Boundary Data,2022 'e The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Boundary J City Boundary 0 750 1.500 A Feet 4� 3-12 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH Exhibit 3.3-4 1 Anaheim Resort Residential (ARR) Overlay in the C-R District Vecrn°nt Ave sl ` City Oft a &. Anaheim �� -' a� % `� Baf_IRd' Ir I Lk=f T� F -Ball, Rd, p`►� 1 1 y � t f tpti, — A co" orayio�d� i � Magic tWgy flieme`Fark: L r r -Cerritos Ave _O.� �,,� I 1\cy Cemlos Ave D 4 1 city Of �. I 2A,_Aare'funfun re Disney - ay 5 I i1 An Anaheim �' II Theme Park t jIn- 3.0 Land Use Plan Kaiella Ave r�or B — — r - �_ ® r I� ICgfella Ave" 9� I� y � — 1 — — grangewopd_Ave CRY BOUNDARY __ i1r� I_ I ] I City of S�" ' tom— _ CnYBOUNDARY Garden Grove rl I I - l City of Orion " :Chapman Ave Anaheim Resort Residential (ARR) Overlay in the C-R District LEGEND MAP FEATURES Notes/sources Parcels subject to the Anaheim Resort Cilytegal Lot Dala,2M The Anaheim Resort ` Boundary Residential Overlay Zone in the C-R District CityBoundaiyDala,2022 The Anaheim Resort I. Specific Plan Boundary C J City Boundary D 750 1,5w � Feet MARCH 2O24 3-13 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 3.0 Land Use Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2024) Exhibit 3.3-51 Public Recreation (PR) District V` City, of, Anaheim Ball: Rd 7— B�dll Rd; L I'a DisneyfuRd rh F,,k IF �:enrltqs-Ave ur r % C y of it CA A dv enfuroAiaheim—TR% Ir Lc Katelia Ave L r-�(—j Ana .1 C_Cent. h..1%. --L�l 10 -71 CITY BOUNDARY J �; I .-1I I WO W %, L-y' P I! City of CRY BOUNDARY: Garden Giove J I r 7 City of L Orange Chdpff(d n Ave Public Recreation (PR) District Plan LEGEND MAP FEATURES The Anaheim Resort Parcels in the PR District Boundary The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary Notes/Sources City Legal Lol Do1c. 2022 City Boundary Data, 2022 0 750 I'sw 8NEEEEE10======= Feet 0 MARCH 202i 3-14 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 3.0 Land Use Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 3.3-6 1 Theme Park (TP) Overlay in the C-R District yem°^t Ave �i. � city,o! � Or e® * r An Anaheim µ 1 Ball Rd BaII Rd rt� d �o r II n�. I J A a �� I �� r r� im -Cerritos _Ave ri _, '(3 ---- ° I qc O' a a r —i—� RIW- {1ARK'W-11 Cfty Of c --J I CA DisoeyWgy N\ Ad�enfu`re Anaheim = L f ICatella_ Ave e- i i r �1� Katella Ave_ w" r 7 —a moAdli I _ c:enr — .. I TXEMEPARKEAST r a N CRYBOUNDARY,_I r -- — —"" - — — _ 1 drdngewood Ave I FA City of LEI r_ _ CRY BOUNDARY Garden Grove I City of 4� Orange ✓ :Chapman Ave "L — — —y Theme Park (TP) Overlay in the C-R District LEGEND MAP FEATURES I Notes/sources �-j 022 The Anaheim Resort Parcels subject to the Theme Park city&— Loy 13Wto oio.z02 Boundary Overlay (East and West) Zone in the C-R District caysovntloryooro.zozz '+ The Anaheim Resort I— Specific Plan Boundary J City Boundary 0 750 1,500 ■1 Feet i�� 3-15 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 3.0 Land Use Plan Exhibit 3.3-7 1 Parking (P) Overlay in the C-R District �, ve�otii P_ve t ' ► City, of Anaheim Bd_II 'Rd m-. t �� -- �� ,la_ �. ➢ Ball Rd 1 �f 'lliern'e. Palk_. , �1v18�it,4,W5y' Lr � 4 ' f —� I �. Cerritos Ave r y -Ql = Cerritos Ave_ C of '1 - r A Adranlurr � 1 ACity naheim =� ...I theme pork �I- Kafella Aye —,r-� I _ r KaJella Ave II s �P i + q S� I_— e CDl'BOUNDARY I _ r — — � — J O�angewood:d_ve City of CRY BOUNDARY Garden Grove I I I City of n Orange —I Chapman Ave- ` — — — — 1 Parking (P) Overlay in the C-R District LEGEND 17—, The Anaheim Resort Boundary — The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Boundary C J City Boundary MAP FEATURES —Parcels subject to the Parking Overlay Zone in the C-R District Notes/Sowaes City, legal Lot Dafa. 2022 City Boundary Data, 2022 0 750 1,500 Feet 3-16 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 3.0 Land Use Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 3.3.8 Central Core Development Standards The third factor affecting land use within the ARSP area are the additional development standards applied to parcels in the heart, or Central Core, of The Anaheim Resort. The Central Core includes parcels with frontage on Harbor Boulevard between 1-5 and Orangewood Avenue, and all parcels with frontage on Katella Avenue between Haster Street/Anaheim Boulevard and Walnut Street. For reasons described in the next paragraph, the Central Core requires different standards than does the periphery, especially with respect to building massing and provision for pedestrians. The Central Core is depicted in Exhibit 3.3-8 (Central Core Plan). Development on the parcels within the Central Core has an especially important role to play in creating an overall image for The Anaheim Resort. Inasmuch as the Central Core is in close proximity to The Anaheim Resort's major attractions, the potential for pedestrian use is greatest in this area. By making the Central Core a more interesting area to walk through, the Central Core development standards will encourage more people to leave their cars and walk, thereby improving vehicular traffic flow. The uses adjacent to these stretches of road within the ARSP area will also have a stronger visual impression on the large number of vehicles that pass through it each day. Among the differences in development standards between the Central Core and the periphery are the following: • In the Central Core, no parking will be allowed between the public right-of-way and the building face, making the Central Core more visually interesting since the parked vehicles will be behind the buildings. Whereas in the periphery, parking is allowed in front of a building provided said parking is not within the minimum required setback from the public right-of-way; • Buildings in the Central Core will be required to occupy a minimum of 60% of the frontage adjacent to the right-of-way (or provide a solid mass of landscape to achieve the same effect) in order to create a well-defined "edge" for the street. No such restrictions will apply to parcels outside the Central Core; and, • Special Landscaped Intersections will be required at the entrances to The Anaheim Resort and the center of the Central Core to create an edge and orient the pedestrian visually. These special development standards for the Central Core are described in Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards. Section 5.0, Design Plan, also contains guidelines which distinguish one area from another. 3-17 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 3.0 Land Use Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 3.3-8 1 Central Core Plan C � V etrt'o�tAve S o I` C1ty ,Of Anaheim w Ball Rd` - _ s e�7-� =-C .:. fi'dII Rd IL a, Diineylond� tTFiemeYgark.. -Cerritos�Ape p r�\ %-Cerritos Ave C o: — �t \ Gify, of F � CAA ,enfu`ie Anaheim I Theme7Rark �v , Kdtellq Ave - aa � KaYella Ave -� • I I C6nViliflon I J I y 1 Cr W%% GYP CNY_BOUNDARY. City of Garden Grove Central Core Plan LEGEND I—, The Anaheim Resort Boundary The Anaheim Resort I. r Specific Plan Boundary C J City Boundary :Orangewood Ave: r� C1rY BOUNDARY] r l City °f I — Orange Chapman Ave — — MAP FEATURES Central Core (Standards and guidelines apply to Vroperties with frontage along these portions of atella Avenue and Harbor Boulevards Special Intersection Landscape Treatment Harbor Boulevard/Katella Avenue Central Core Intersection Area described in The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program Notes/Sources City Legol Lot Data. 2022 City Boundary Doto, 2D22 0 750 1,500 feet MARCH 2O A 3-18 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 3.4 Non Visitor -Serving Uses In order to foster the establishment and growth within The Anaheim Resort of tourist, convention and entertainment -related industries, such as theme parks, hotels, motels, vacation ownership resorts, tourist -oriented retail and entertainment, restaurants, movie theaters, convention and conference facilities and other visitor -serving facilities, and recognizing that the presence of non -visitor -serving uses in The Anaheim Resort would be incompatible with this goal, residential uses may only be permitted in limited areas of the ARSP area as provided by and in accordance with the Anaheim Resort Residential (ARR) Overlay (Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.116.125) in effect as of March 19, 2007 (conditionally permitted residential uses in conjunction with the development of a full service hotel having at least 300 hotel rooms and where (i) hotel uses comprise at least half of the site density, (ii) residential uses on the site are fully integrated into the hotel, and (iii) adjacent to public rights -of -way, residential uses are at least two stories or 25 feet above ground level, and residential uses are also permitted as provided by and in accordance with the Mobile Home Park (MHP) Overlay (Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 18.26) in effect as of March 19, 2007. No other residential uses shall be incorporated into the Commercial Recreation land use designation and/or allowed within the ARSP area without (i) completion of an Environmental Impact Report prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, (ii) completion of a long-term economic impact analysis of the proposed change by an independent financial advisor retained by the City, (iii) approval by the City Council, and (iv) approval of a majority of voters of the City of Anaheim at a regularly -scheduled municipal election. 3.0 Land Use Plan 3-19 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) This page is intentionally blank. 3-20 3.0 Land Use Plan The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 4.0 PUBLIC FACILITIES PLAN The Public Facilities Plan contains a description of the proposed plans for transportation, utilities, infrastructure, and services for the ARSP area. The first two subsections describe regional improvements, which have an impact on the ARSP area. The improvements described under each of the remaining sections are intended to summarize the infrastructure/services needed for the complete build -out of The Anaheim Resort. More detailed information concerning the public facilities is provided in SEIR No. 340 and SEIR No. 352, which contain detailed maps and exhibits, including a thorough discussion of the existing conditions within the ARSP area. 4.1 Regional Circulation Programs Currently, several major facilities provide vehicular access to the ARSP area. They include: 1-5, Katella Avenue, Haster Street/Anaheim Boulevard, Ball Road, Harbor Boulevard, Chapman Avenue, and Disney Way. Secondary roads within the ARSP area include: Manchester Avenue, Clementine Street, Orangewood Avenue, Walnut Street, West Street, and Disneyland Drive. All other streets within the ARSP area are Local Streets, including Alro Way, Casa Vista Street, Vermont Avenue, Wilken Way, and Zeyn Street. Many roads within the ARSP area have been, or are anticipated to be improved, in connection with other local, county, and State circulation programs. Facilities in this category include: • 1-5, interchanges at West Street/ Disneyland Drive, Harbor Boulevard/Ball Road, Katella Avenue/Disney Way/Anaheim Boulevard, Gene Autry Way, and Orangewood Avenue 4.0 Public Facilities Plan have been improved as part of the 1-5 widening; • Katella Avenue has been improved and will be further widened as part of the Orange County Smart Street Program; and, • Several intersections have been identified in the City's Planned Roadway Network to receive additional supplemental turning lanes, including but not limited to, Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue, Katella Avenue and Anaheim Boulevard/Haster Street, Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road, Harbor Boulevard and Convention Way, and Haster Street and Gene Autry Way. Improvements are funded by State and Federal funds, Orange County's Measure M funds, City Traffic Impact Fees, as well as other public and private sources. As part of DisneylandForward, which amends The Disneyland Resort Project, previously contemplated extensions of Gene Autry Way east of Harbor Boulevard to Haster Street and Clementine Street from Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue were removed to allow for application and buildout of the DRSP Southeast District and the TP East Overlay. From Haster Street, the existing Gene Autry Way connects to the 1-5 high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes and the Platinum Triangle. Exhibit 4.1-1 (Vehicular Circulation Plan) shows the existing circulation system as well as planned improvements to the existing system described in the preceding paragraphs. The Transportation and Traffic Sections of SEIR No. 340 and SEIR No. 352 also contain detailed information on the existing circulation system. 4-1 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 4.1-1 1 Vehicular Circulation Plan 4.0 Public Facilities Plan �i♦ `�` V ercAo�t -Aye City of s r Anaheitm' S `JDoll Rd 1 } •��PAYIFKiN6�. I I for — Ball_Rd; —� �% <; f? Paklwairig, - idr'e"o. D'ianeylbnd. �NiU¢IE?G�JSy' `T►reme�Park I ` 1 ,Cer, ritos Ave- 4 N, ♦ Cerritos-Ave s c O OVERL't41;.60S •Q ___� ®m. S� a 7 J i �l rjE%PARK WEST Ltp , O - VERUY` - City ofr J Divi—efy W�a'1y�� t� Anclheim j JI� 7&4k ePgrk ` o L L Kgtellq AYe L t — r ` e �' �O' ryrMr I'.IRI•. ra,sr 7 II C OVcRl.RY C X ��I 9 I P [IiC BOUNDARY. r 111 y I 1i I I �I yL CIIYROUNDAFYI I � City of r Oiange _ ClidpmanAve L — — — Vehicular Circulation Plan LEGEND MAP FEATURES r _, The Anaheim Resort Partially Completed AR SP a� Boundary Vehicular Circulation Improvements The Anaheim Resort `Carnh'vnl'wn alcwnpk1e andnpnalnirgtobe °named""""RetlevB1op eM l� r Specific Plan Boundary C Lane Configurations Modified Due City Boundary C J to Removal of Gene Autry Way - �RelerrosERaszxcmnarytea�-oar.Padanan Modified Due NRe �IdC e�/wrryrwl� S Pro posed Traffic Signal (o dex'pimnoi R�apared4airc sgn�oblS� Feasible Improvements Proposed IReln to SEIR 3525ecRon 511 -uan: odarronlordesviplion of rea:ie� ImPra.'emenh ttoPo>ca1 Existing Theme Park Drop Off Area Proposed Theme Park �lDorcooBDon )ff, Area prop OII AraeaRu epP'obnolelPo4 Notes/Sources City Legal Lot Data, 2022 City Boundary Data, 2022 0 750 11500 Feet MARCH 2O24 4-2 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 4.2 Regional Infrastructure Programs The Anaheim Resort is located in an area that has been served by public utilities and facilities for many years. As part of ongoing efforts to improve the City's infrastructure, new facilities have been installed within the ARSP area, are currently planned, or are underway. Some of these (such as improvements to the regional sewage treatment facilities) are planned to proceed regardless of the activity in the ARSP area. Among the projects currently proposed are: • Enlargement of sewers, or parallel lines to handle increased flows; • A new water transmission main and a new water well to supply increased demand; • Construction of a new electrical substation facility; • Upgrades to existing and construction of new storm drain facilities; and • New larger water mains (16" in Harbor Blvd. from Orangewood Ave. to Chapman Ave.) and a new well to supply increased demand. These projects are discussed in greater detail in SEIR No. 340. 4.3 Vehicular Circulation Plan for the Anaheim Resort Convenient automobile access to The Anaheim Resort is an essential component to the success of the area. Most visitors will come to The Anaheim Resort by automobile or bus, and it is especially important that the visitors' experience be pleasant upon both arrival and departure. In connection with The Disneyland Resort, several improvements to the area wide circulation system have been implemented. 4.0 Public Facilities Plan These improvements are more fully described in The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. The following is a discussion of the circulation improvements completed or proposed for The Anaheim Resort including those improvements completed as part of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. 4.3.1 Connections to Interstate 5 (1-5) Convenient connections from 1-5 to the proposed public parking facilities in The Disneyland Resort have been implemented. Approximately 70% of the visitors to The Disneyland Resort arrive on I- 5. Moving them on and off 1-5 safely and efficiently is accomplished in a variety of ways. During the early stage of implementation of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, a new mixed flow off -ramp was constructed at the Disneyland Drive exit north of Ball Road. This permits southbound traffic to exit to Disneyland Drive and then onto a ramp that provides a direct link to the public parking facility in the West Parking Area of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Parking District. When the traffic leaving the parking facilities in The Disneyland Resort exceeds the traffic entering these facilities, the lanes leading into the parking facilities and crossing over Ball Road are reversed, permitting visitors to exit conveniently onto 1-5. Generally, the lanes are used for inbound traffic in the morning and for outbound traffic in the afternoon and evening. Use of the interchange by those not visiting The Disneyland Resort and/or not in a HOV, have also been accommodated. A similar system permits visitors arriving from the south to exit the HOV lane on a ramp that travels under the elevated portion of 1-5 directly to Disney Way and provides convenient access to uses located in the east part of the ARSP area. 4-3 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) This system keeps The Anaheim Resort traffic from congesting traffic on Katella Avenue. Existing access patterns to surrounding properties have generally been maintained, except that West Street was made into a cul-de- sac south of Ball Road and renamed West Place. In addition, Cerritos Avenue has been relocated approximately 1,000 feet north of its previous location. The relocated street section is named Magic Way and was constructed when West Street was realigned south of Ball Road. 4.4 Anaheim Resort Arterial/ Secondary System One of the important objectives of the ARSP is to minimize traffic impacts on surrounding arterial and secondary streets. The system of connections to 1-5 that lead conveniently to area uses contributes significantly to this objective. In addition, improvements that have been completed since the 1994 adoption of the ARSP or are proposed to be made to the local streets will enhance the overall vehicular circulation within The Anaheim Resort. The street cross sections described in this Section are typical mid - block sections. They are not intended to depict every condition which may exist in the ARSP area. Additionally, more detailed information about street rights -of -way can be found in the Design Plan. They are subject to variation at intersections and at other locations as determined by the City Engineer. 4.0 Public Facilities Plan Exhibit 4.1-1 (Vehicular Circulation Plan) shows the location of the major roads and streets within the ARSP area. The specific improvements proposed for each street are discussed on the following pages. Exhibit 4.4 (Cross Section Street Segments Within The Anaheim Resort) depicts the segments of the designated road cross sections, which correspond to the proposed improvements described for the following major roads and streets: • Disneyland Drive (Exhibits 4.4-1 and 4.4-2); • West Street (Exhibit 4.4-3); • West Place (Exhibit 4.4-4); • Disney Way (Exhibit 4.4-5); • Katella Avenue (Exhibits 4.4-6 to 4.4-7); • Walnut Street (Exhibit 4.4-8); • Harbor Boulevard (Exhibits 4.4-9 to 4.4-12); • Ball Road (Exhibits 4.4-13 to 4.4-15); • Clementine Street (Exhibit 4.4-16); • Haster Street/Anaheim Boulevard (Exhibit 4.4-17); • Convention Way (Exhibit 4.4-18); • Gene Autry Way (Exhibits to 4.4-19; • Manchester Avenue (Exhibits 4.4-20 to 4.4-23); • Orangewood Avenue (Exhibit 4.4-24); • Chapman Avenue (Exhibit 4.4-25); • Alro Way (Exhibit 4.4-26); • Casa Vista Street (Exhibit 4.4-27); • Vermont Avenue (Exhibit 4.4-28); • Wilken Way (Exhibit 4.4-29); and, • Zeyn Street (Exhibit 4.4-30). 4-4 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) As a part of Disneyland Forward, the planned extensions of Clementine Street south of Katella Avenue and Gene Autry Way between Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street were removed from the Circulation Element of the City of Anaheim General Plan and the Specific Plan. For that reason, the previous Cross -Sections 18 (Clementine Street, south of Katella) and 21 (Gene Autry Way between Harbor and Haster) were removed from Exhibit 4.4 (Cross -Section Street Segments Within The Anaheim Resort). 4.0 Public Facilities Plan 4-5 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 4.4 1 Cross Section Street Segments Within The Anaheim Resort 4.0 Public Facilities Plan 1 , ♦, O v6�mont Pie , a. City of µ Anaheim _ 1 BaII:Ra 13 -• ball Rd 4e 4 .!1 �.- _ 3 Disneyland Theme Park 20 \ �Iv1c�Ic: VJb� v I i ya21+ ,CemtosAve e a?, II a 6— 22, Cemfos Ave_ r � w l' `r a nii= v.%y 36 Y Ci/tCA Ad Anaheim Theme Pprk j1 {II - 30 Katella Ave 7 T _ L —_ b �--- 17 a t4 C11Y BOUNDARY I Orangewood.Ave A Kafella, "Ave_ C t t i9 r CRY BOUNDARY' Garden, Grove' p _ I , _ -� City of r r Orange I Chapman Avg I— — — — — — Cross Section Street Segments LEGEND [_-IThe Anaheim Resort Boundary MAP FEATURES �� Segments of the Designated Road Nots/Sourcrs cityl_n lotoato.202 CtyBoundary Data, 2022 — '2� The Anaheim Resort I— Specific Plan Boundary Specific Plan 92-1 Boundary J City Bounds Specific Plan 92-2 S ® p Specific Plan 93-1 NOTE. The numbers shown in the map above conespond To street cross sections spectried within Section 4.4, Anaheim Resart Arterial/Secondary system (with the prefix 4.4-X). 0 750 ".0 Feet MARCH 2O24 4-6 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Disneyland Drive between 1-5 and Katella Avenue serves both The Disneyland Resort and uses within the ARSP area such as the Anaheim Convention Center. Disneyland Drive is connected to 1-5 with an interchange. Between 1-5 and Ball Road, Disneyland Drive accommodates traffic arriving or departing from The Anaheim Resort, including the public parking facilities in The Disneyland Resort, the Anaheim Convention Center and area hotels. Exhibit 4.4-1 (Disneyland Drive (North of Ball Road) Cross Section), shows the typical right-of-way, parkways, sidewalks and travel lanes for this portion of Disneyland Drive. Exhibit 4.4-1 Disneyland Drive (North of Ball Road) Cross Section r 5-foot sidewalk 5-foot sidew 8-foot parkway 8-foot parkway 3 travel lanes, 3 travel lanes, typical typical 13 ft 36 feet min 36 feet min 13 ft i Right-of-way: 98 ft min At Ball Road, traffic on Disneyland Drive may either go over Ball Road directly to and from The Disneyland Resort parking facilities via a two lane overpass with reversible lanes or through the Ball Road intersection. Traffic bound for other destinations has full access to Ball Road. South of the Ball Road intersection, Disneyland Drive has two basic cross section conditions. The first cross section is described and depicted in The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and applies to the portion of Disneyland Drive located south of Ball Road up to the entry to The Disneyland Resort parking facilities. 4-7 4.0 Public Facilities Plan The second cross-section applies to the portion of Disneyland Drive located south of The Disneyland Resort parking facilities to Katella Avenue. This cross-section is depicted in Exhibit 4.4-2 (Disneyland Drive (Between 825 feet n/o Katella Avenue and 1,350 feet n/o Katella Avenue)). This portion of Disneyland Drive provides access to hotels and other uses within The Anaheim Resort. The cross-section depicts two northbound and two southbound lanes of traffic separated by a raised landscaped median. Right and left -turn lanes have been installed in some locations to improve traffic flow. Exhibit 4.4-2 Disneyland Drive (Between 825 feet n/o Katella Avenue and 1,350 feet n/o Katella Avenue) Cross Section 8-foot sidewalk 8-foot sidewalk Landscaped 8-foot parkway median 8-foot parkway 2 travel 2 travel lanes lanes v 16ft 24ft 15ft 24ft 16ft Right-of-way: 95 ft min { West Street is a continuation of Disneyland Drive, south of Katella Avenue. Supplemental turning lanes have been added to Disneyland DriveANest Street at the intersection of Katella Avenue to facilitate traffic flow. South of this intersection (approximately 600 feet south of the intersection with Katella Avenue), the right-of- way and roadway accommodates two lanes of travel in each direction. Exhibit 4.4-3 (West Street (South of Katella Avenue) Cross Section) shows the current configuration of this portion of West Street. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 4.4-3 West Street (South of Katella Avenue) Cross Section 5-foot sidewalk 5-foot sidewalk 8-foot parkway 8-foot parkway 2 travel lanes, 2 travel lanes typical typical 13 ft I 32 ft i 32 ft I 13 ft Right-of-way: 90 ft min West Place is a cul-de-sac, located immediately south of its intersection with Ball Road and depicted in Exhibit 4.4f (West Place Cross Section). Exhibit 4.4-4 West Place Cross Section 10-foot parkway 10-foot parkway 4-foot parkway 4-foot parkway Minimum one travel 0-20 foot lane each direction 0-20 foot parkway I parkway i I 14-34 ft I 52 ft 1 14-34 ft Minimum right-of-way: 100-120 ft fright -of -way: 100-120 ft 1111t Disney Way between Anaheim Boulevard and Harbor Boulevard has two to three travel lanes in each direction, except at Anaheim Boulevard and Clementine Street where the street has been widened to provide supplemental turning lanes. Classified as a Primary Arterial, Disney Way serves the traffic entering and leaving the east portion of The Anaheim Resort and the public parking facility located in the Parking Overlay and the East Parking Area of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. The portion of Disney Way west of Clementine Street is described in The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. East of Clementine Street, a landscaped median will ultimately be constructed, as illustrated in Exhibit 4.4-6 (Disney Way (East of Clementine Street) Cross Section). 4-8 4.0 Public Facilities Plan Concurrent with the adoption of Amendment No. 17 (Disneyland Forward) to the Specific Plan, the City adopted a General Plan Amendment which reclassified Disney Way between Anaheim Boulevard and Harbor Boulevard from a six -lane Major Arterial to a four -lane Primary Arterial (with no change to the width of the ultimate public right-of-way). This allows Disney Way to be reduced from three to two through travel lanes between Anaheim Boulevard and Harbor Boulevard. As part of Disneyland Forward, the eastbound travel lanes for Disney Way east of Clementine Street will be modified to provide an exit ramp/flyover from the public parking facility located within the East Parking Area of the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Parking District. With the approval of Disneyland Forward, the following roadway improvements associated with the East Parking Facility within the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan will occur within the ARSP: • Reconfiguration of Disney Way/Clementine Street to accommodate the East Parking Area parking facility exit ramp/flyover; • Disney Way/Clementine Street intersection improvements to accommodate the East Parking Area parking facility exit ramp; • Reconfiguration of the west side of Manchester Avenue, north of Disney Way to accommodate a Class I bicycle facility. Exhibit 4.4-5 Disney Way (East of Clementine Street) Cross Section 2 travel lanes Flyover ramp from parking structure 8-foot parkway, 12 travel lanes 8-foot parkway 10-foot multi -use, Class Landscaped 5-foot sidewalk I bicycle facility east of median I east of Clemenline Clementine' + least 713 ft 35-39 ft 24 ft 35-39 ft 13 ft Min- right-of-way: 120 ft Improvements Note.- 3 travel lanes in each direction were completed prior to DisneylandForward (see plans on file in the Public Works Department for the nghFOF-way dimensions along Disney Way which may vary from the abom cross section). During DisneylandForwam, 2 travel lanes in each direction are proposed. A Gass 1 bicycle facility will be added to the north side of Disney Way partially within the existing dghtrof-way. An additionat 5-foo! easement hom Southern California Edison and Caltrans will be needed to allow for the Class I bicycle facility. Final design of Disney Way is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 4.0 Public Facilities Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Katella Avenue has three to four travel lanes in each direction within The Anaheim Resort. Eastbound and westbound Katella Avenue include right -turn lanes and double left -turn lanes at most intersections, as well as a raised landscaped median, which separates opposing traffic between signalized intersections. Katella Avenue ultimately will be widened to four lanes in each direction east of West Street/Disneyland Drive, as shown in Exhibit 4.4- 6 (Ultimate Katella Avenue (Between Interstate 5 and West Street/Disneyland Drive) Cross Section). These exhibits show the location of the ultimate right-of-way as well as the interim condition. Katella Avenue is currently four lanes westbound from Manchester Avenue to 600 feet west of Clementine Street. Katella Avenue between Walnut Street and West Street/Disneyland Drive will continue to have three travel lanes in each direction, with a minimum 15 foot wide landscaped median. Exhibit 4.4-7 (Ultimate Katella Avenue (Between Walnut Street and West Street/Disneyland Drive) Cross Section), shows the ultimate of Katella Avenue between West Street/Disneyland Drive and Walnut Street. 4-9 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 4.4-6 Ultimate Katella Avenue (Between Interstate 5 and West Street/Disneyland Drive) Cross Section Ufinate rw-of-wm "Ot lamed padmray Bloat skkinmk 84od hwhcaped i I - 1 4 Usael lanes 4.0 Public Facilities Plan Utinate rift-0f-ray 84M 1-d—ped padnmy 8400t skkwMk l.amismped 840d kndscWed =dkn padaray 1 4 hwol hffm - I i * W 24 t 1 46 It 1 242E t I 46 R Right-of-way Iscles R 24 R Exhibit 4.4-7 Ultimate Katella Avenue (Between Walnut Street and West Street(Disneyland Drive) Cross Section 8-foot landscaped parkway Landscaped median 8-foot landscaped parkway 8-foot sidewalk width varies: 8-foot sidewalk 26 ft at West St.! SCE Corridor Disneyland Dr.; 8-foot landscaped 15 ft east of Walnut St. parkway 3 travel lanes 1 3 travel lanes 16 ft 35 ft varies 35 ft 24 ft i Right-of-way: 125-136 ft Improvements Note: Partially completed. Remaining 8-foot wide landscape parkway improvement on the south side of Katells Avenue will be ingtallled as new developments occur in the ARSP. 4-10 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Walnut Street carries two lanes of traffic in each direction between Katella Avenue and Ball Road with a raised median. The portion of Walnut Street south of Goodhue Avenue is described in the Disneyland Report Specific Plan. North of Goodhue Avenue, the cross section is depicted in Exhibit 4.4-8 (Walnut Street (Between Ball Road and Goodhue Avenue) Cross Section). Consistent with the City's Bicycle Master Plan, a Class I bicycle facility will be installed within and/or adjacent to the existing ultimate right-of- way on the east side of the street. These improvements will be installed consistent with the City standards, as determined by the City Engineer. Exhibit 4.4-8 Walnut Street (Between Ball Road and Goodhue Avenue) Cross Section Setback and sidewalk/parkway condition varies; to remain as -is Landscaped 3-Toot parkway median 10-foot multi -use, 2 travel I 2 travel Class I bicycle lanes i lanes I facility 9ft1 24ft 15ft 24ft ft Right-of-way: 85-87 ft Improvement Note: A Class I bicycle facility will be added to the easq side of Walnut Street within the exis?ing nghtof--way. Final design of Walnut Street is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Harbor Boulevard. Within the ARSP area, south of 1-5, Harbor Boulevard is a six -lane divided road except at Manchester Avenue, Disney Way, Katella Avenue, Convention Way, Orangewood Avenue, and Chapman Avenue, where it has been widened to accommodate additional right- and left -turn lanes. Exhibit 4.4-9 (Harbor Boulevard (Between Chapman Avenue and Orangewood Avenue) Cross Section) reflects the ultimate condition of this section of Harbor Boulevard. A landscaped 4.0 Public Facilities Plan median will ultimately be constructed. The cross section in the exhibit below does not apply for the portion of Harbor Boulevard located within the City of Garden Grove, south of Wilken Way. Exhibit 4.4-9 Harbor Boulevard (Between Chapman Avenue and Orangewood Avenue) Cross Section 8-Toot parkway Landscaped parkway 5-foot sidewalk I median 18-foot 5-foot sidewalk Min. 3 travel l Min. 3 travel lanes lanes G24 13 ft 35-39 ft ft 35-39 ft 13 ft Minimum right-of-way: 120 feet min Median and travel lanes vary in width to a curb to curb width of 94 feet. Exhibit 4.4-10 (Harbor Boulevard (Orangewood Avenue to Manchester Avenue on the East Side and Orangewood Avenue to 150-250 Feet South of Manchester Avenue on the West Side) Cross Section) shows the typical Harbor Boulevard cross section which applies between Orangewood Avenue and a point approximately 150-250 feet south of Manchester Avenue on the west side and to Manchester Avenue on the east side. 4-11 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 4.4-10 Harbor Boulevard (Orangewood Avenue to Manchester Avenue on the East Side and Orangewood Avenue to 150-250 Feet South of Manchester Avenue on the West Side) Cross Section &foot parkway 8-foot parkway 8-fo sidewalk 8-foot sidewalk kwayot 6-foot parI Landscaped 18 foot parkway median !I Min. 3 travel Min. 3 travel 1 lanes lanes 2D-26 ft 24 ft 35-38 ft mm m1n 35-38 ft min 24 ft Ultimate Right-of-way: 150 ft Improvements Nate: PadiaWy completed. Remaining &foot wide landscpae parkway improvements wX be inslaeed as new devefapmerda occurei the ARSP. Exhibit 4.4-11 (Harbor Boulevard (Between Manchester Avenue on the East Side and 150- 250 feet South of Manchester Avenue on the West Side to the Interstate 5 Interchange) Cross Section) applies to Harbor Boulevard between Manchester Avenue on the East Side and 150- 250 feet south of Manchester Avenue on the west side to the 1-5 interchange, the Harbor Boulevard right-of-way. This portion of Harbor Boulevard narrows to transition to the Harbor Boulevard overpass, which is raised above 1-5. Exhibit 4.4-11 Harbor Boulevard (Between Manchester Avenue on the East Side and 150-250 feet South of Manchester Avenue on the West Side to the Interstate 5 Interchange) Cross Section II9400tperkwayl Lan dscaped 9-fadpetkwayl sidewalk7p Mnirnmt 3traM tames Niunttm 3trarA lanes -,I- 6-9ft35ft"n 20tnat 35ftnit 69 ft 1I Nght-0Lway vanes 102-109 t mkiim nt III I North of 1-5, Harbor Boulevard has a raised median and six lanes of travel except at Ball Road and 1-5 where it has been widened to 4.0 Public Facilities Plan accommodate additional through, right- and left - lanes. The parkway consists of a 9-foot sidewalk with cutouts for tree wells. Exhibit 4.4-12 Harbor Boulevard (Interstate 5 to Vermont Avenue) Cross Section 94od sidewalk 9toot sideasdt land mpw ITree wets tredwrt Tree W Nidrmm 3 fraud tales hillin mnt 3 kwel lanes 9ft 41ft 1161ttm 41ft 9t i t14nalle tbgltt-0f-my: 12a ft j Ball Road is six lanes, except at West Street/ Disneyland Drive, Cast Place and Harbor Boulevard, where it is wider to accommodate additional through right- and left -turn lanes. Ball Road has landscape medians, with the exception of between West Place and Cast Place where it has painted medians. Currently, the right-of-way varies from 103 to 120 feet. The ultimate right-of- way west of West Place will be 120 feet, and the ultimate right-of-way between West Place and Cast Place and east of Cast Place will continue to be 106 feet as designated in the General Plan. As part of a City -led update to the Circulation Element of the General Plan in 2017, Class II bicycle lanes were added to Ball Road, as reflected in Exhibits 4.4-13 through 4.4-15. Exhibit 4.4-13 Ball Road (With Landscaped Median West of West Place) Cross Section Class II bicycle facility 6-foot parkway 3 travel lanes, typ. ri foot parkway Landscaped 4-foot sidewalk I med1, F Jian 4-foot sidewalk i ftRI 35fl I16ft 1 35fl I ftft Ultimate night -of -way: 120 ft Improvements Note: Prior to DisneylandFonvaM, all improvements were completed, with the exception of the north side ofBafl Road. As part of Street reconfiguration. a Class 11 bicycle lane will be added within the right-of-way. Final design of Ball Road is subject to approval of the City Engineer. 4-12 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 4.4-14 Ball Road (Between West Place and Cast Place) Cross Section Painted 6-foot parkway median 6-foot parkway 4-foot sidewalk) I I 4-foot sidewalk +II 3 travel 1 3 travel lanes, typ. lanes, typ. �� L 35ft 18ft 35ft ft Ultimate right-of-way: 106 ft 'Within 600 feet east and west of Harbor Boulevard. this dimension is 9 feet including 9-foot sidewalks with tree wells only. Improvements Note: Prior to DisneylandForward, all improvements were completed, with the exception of the north side of Ball Road. Final design of Bell Road is subject to approval of the City Engineer. Exhibit 4.4-15 Ball Road (East of Cast Place) Cross Section Raised median" Tree wells I ITlee wells 10-foot' sidewalk sidewalk 3 travel 3 travellanes,typ. lanes, typ. lfit7? 35 ft 16 ft 35 ft fta Ultimate right-of-way: 106 ft Within 600 feet east and wes9 of Harbor Boulevard, this dimension is 9 teat including 9-loot sidewalks with tree wells only. "Median is landscaped east of Harbor Boulevard. Improvements Note: Priw to oisneylandForward, all improvements were completed, with Me exception of the north side of Ball Road. Final design of Bali Road is subject to approval or the City Engineer. Clementine Street serves two lanes of travel in each direction and is 87 feet to accommodate a landscaped median. Concurrent with the adoption of Amendment No. 17 (Disneyland Forward) to the ARSP, the City adopted a General Plan Amendment to remove the planned future extension of Clementine Street between Katella Avenue and Orangewood Avenue in the south. Prior to Disneyland Forward, the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan contemplated transit improvements within the median for the segment of Clementine Street between Disney Way and Katella Avenue. As transit improvements within the median are not contemplated as part of DisneylandForward, all improvements to this street were completed prior to 4.0 Public Facilities Plan Disneyland Forward. All street improvements to this street were completed prior to Phase IV, with the exception of potential future transit improvements (i.e., bus or other improvements) as approved by the City. As part of Amendment No. 17 (Disneyland Forward) to the ARSP, improvements to Clementine Street will include the replacement of the existing sidewalk on the west side of Clementine Street between Disney Way and Alro Way with a multi -use Class I bicycle facility. The adjacent property owner(s) will dedicate the required property to the City to allow for the minimum, adequate horizontal width for the multi- use Class I bicycle facility. Improvements associated with DisneylandForward may also include a traffic signal at Arlo Way. The timing for installation of these improvements is identified in Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 387, associated with Disneyland Forward. Exhibit 4.4-16 Clementine Street Cross Section 4-foot sidewalk 4-foot sidewalk Landscaped 8-foot parkway Median 8-foot parkway 2 travel lanes 2 travel lanes 12ft I 24ft I 15ft I 24ft I 12ft I Right-of-way: 87 ft Haster Street/Anaheim Boulevard includes three travel lanes in each direction with a 16-foot wide raised median north of Katella Avenue. South of Katella Avenue, there are two travel lanes in each direction with a 12-foot wide painted median. At the street's intersection with Katella Avenue, the street is wider to accommodate turning lanes. The ultimate condition for Haster Street, south of Katella Avenue is six lanes with a 16-foot wide landscaped median, consistent with its 4-13 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) designation as a Primary Arterial Highway in the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan and the current street configuration north of Katella Avenue. Improvements to the west side of Haster Street, south of Katella Avenue to the southern boundary of the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan were completed. The remaining improvements on the east side of Haster Street are in ARSP area and will be completed as new development occurs. As part of Disneyland Forward, improvements to Haster Street may include a potential left -turn lane on northbound Haster Street and a potential right - turn lane on southbound Haster Street into and out of the Southeast District of the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and a potential traffic signal. The timing for installation of these improvements is identified in Mitigation Monitoring Plan No.387. At Gene Autry Way, Haster Street will also be widened to accommodate additional turning lanes. In addition, consistent with the City's Bicycle Master Plan, a Class II bicycle facility will be installed within the existing street right-of-way. These improvements will be installed consistent with the City standards, as determined by the City Engineer. Exhibit 4.4-17 Haster StreetJAnaheim Boulevard Cross Section 6-foot parkway I Class II bicycle facility 6-foot parkway 4-foot sidewalk I Landscaped 4-foot sidewalk median 3 travel 3 travel lanes, typ. 1 lanes, typ. 11 ft ft 35ft 16ft 35ft ft ft Ultimate right-of-way: 120 ft Improvements Note: With the exception of partially completed travel lanes on the east side of Haster, all improvements completed prior to Disneylandforward. Convention Way will continue to serve the Anaheim Convention Center in its current right- of-way width of 110 feet as depicted in Exhibit 4.4-20 (Convention Way Cross Section). An 18- foot wide landscape median is provided except where left -turn lanes reduce the median to 8 feet. Three travel lanes are provided in each direction 4.0 Public Facilities Plan and a 10-foot wide sidewalk area. The sidewalk has 4-foot wide landscaped cutouts at the back of the sidewalk. Exhibit 4.4-18 Convention Way Cross Section 4-fia1 plan" anas 4-roort penfbg areas LmWscgmd I10400tsidewak m lo-faotaidewalr 'IIY 3 (ravel tares 3 U%W tangy l 1011 3611 i } left ! Wa loft .t ffl#*0F%W. 110 ft j The western portion of Convention Way is currently improved with the Anaheim Convention Center Grand Plaza no typical cross section exists at this time. Gene Autry Way. Concurrent with the adoption of Amendment No. 17 (Disneyland Forward) to the ARSP, the City adopted a General Plan Amendment to remove the planned future extension of Gene Autry Way between Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street as a primary arterial roadway on the Circulation Element. As a result, Gene Autry Way will not be constructed between Harbor Boulevard and Haster Street. Between Haster Street and 1-5, Gene Autry Way transitions to the HOV interchange accommodating vehicles from the HOV lanes on 1-5. This interchange is elevated and sound walls have also been constructed in this location. 4-14 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 4.4-19 Gene Autry Way (East of Haster Street) Cross Section 1.5 foot soundwall 1.5 foot soundwall 5-foot sidewalk Landscaped 5-foot sidewalk median �5-foot landscaped parkway 5-foot landscaped parkway I 3 travel lanes 3 travel lanes IIW loft 35it 1611 35ft 10ft Right-of-way: 108 ft .� Manchester Avenue is divided into three parts: West Manchester Avenue (extends in an east -west direction from Harbor Boulevard); North Manchester Avenue (extends in a southeastern direction from West Manchester Avenue adjacent to 1-5 to Clementine Street); and, Manchester Avenue, south of Katella (extends in a southeastern direction adjacent to I- 5, east of Disney Way to the southern boundary of The Anaheim Resort. West Manchester Avenue will retain its current right-of-way and parkway/sidewalk configuration, as depicted in Exhibit 4.4-22 (Manchester Avenue Cross Section) Exhibit 4.4-20 West Manchester Avenue Cross Section 5-faot adewak 5 fad adown Landscaped kw 8.5-krd paray meldian 8.5-fad pwicws 2travel lanes W 2travellanes 13.52 I 24111 - 1 15ft 24ft 13.5ft I laght-of-way: 90 a j North Manchester Avenue is the portion of Manchester Avenue located adjacent to 1-5 that was relocated as part of the widening of the freeway and improvements for the interchange at Katella Avenue and 1-5. The ultimate configuration for this portion of Manchester 4.0 Public Facilities Plan Avenue, which occurs adjacent to 1-5, is depicted in Exhibit 4.4-21 (North Manchester Avenue (Adjacent to Interstate 5, North of the Parking Overlay) Cross Section). As part of Disneyland Forward, a transportation facility may be located within the P Overlay adjacent to North Manchester Avenue. To enhance access to the transportation facility, North Manchester Avenue would be widened up to five lanes in front of the transportation facility to provide a two-way left turn lane, and may include a landscaped median, as shown in Exhibit 4.4-22 (North Manchester Avenue (Adjacent to Interstate 5 and the Parking Overlay North of Arlo Way) Cross Section). In addition, consistent with the City's Bicycle Master Plan, a Class I bicycle facility will be installed partially within the existing street right- of-way. As part of Disneyland Forward, an additional 4 feet was added to the existing street right-of-way to accommodate the Class I bicycle facility on the west side of Manchester Avenue from the proposed Bus Shuttle Drop -Off Area to the East Parking Area of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. These improvements will be installed consistent with the City standards, as determined by the City Engineer. Exhibit 4.4-21 North Manchester Avenue (Adjacent to Interstate 5, North of the Parking Overlay) Cross Section 8-foot parkway 5-foot parkway 4-foot sidewalkl ill 2 travel 2 travel lanes lanes 12it 25ft 25ft 5 ft Right-of-way: 67 ft Improvement Note: Final design of MancheaTerAvenue is subject to approval of the City Engineer. 4-15 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 4.4-22 North Manchester Avenue (Adjacent to Interstate 5 and the Parking Overlay, North of Alro Way) Cross Section 8-foot parkway Varies from 20-foot to 30-foot 12-foot parkway 10-foot multi -use, landscaped median Class I bicycle facility 2 travel I 2 travel lanes + lanes ft2D ft 22 ft 24 ft ft Right-of-way: 96 ft Improvements Note: As part of Phase IV, a muN-use Class I bicycle facility will be added to the west side of North ManchesterAvenue within the right-of-way The adjacent property owner(s) will dedicate the required property to the City to allow for the minimum, adequate horizontal width for the multi -use Class I bicycle facility. A precise alignment was approved for this section. Manchester Avenue, south of Katella Avenue (Adjacent to Interstate 5, east of Disney Way) became a one-way (traveling south) frontage road adjacent to 1-5 as part of the widening of 1-5. There are three lanes of travel as depicted in Exhibit 4.4-23 (Manchester Avenue, East of Anaheim Boulevard (Adjacent to Interstate 5) Cross Section. Exhibit 4.4-23 Manchester Avenue, East of Anaheim Boulevard (Adjacent to Interstate 5) Cross Section 4-foot sidewalk 5-foot parkway 64cwt. parkway Minimum 3 travel lanes (n one direction) 10 ft I Minimum 37 ft 61 Right-of-way_ Minimum 521t I Orangewood Avenue is designated as Secondary Arterial with four travel lanes except at Harbor Boulevard where Orangewood Avenue will be widened to accommodate additional left - and right -turn lanes. 4.0 Public Facilities Plan Exhibit 4.4-24 Orangewood Avenue Cross Section 5-fwt sidewalk 54aat sidedvalk y 5-ioot aa�r� Travel lanes vary w loft I 35ft I 35ft 10ft 1 Riight-0f�.90ft 1_ Chapman Avenue is a Primary Arterial with six travel lanes and a landscaped median. At Harbor Boulevard, Chapman Avenue will be widened to accommodate additional left- and right -turn lanes. Exhibit 4.4-25 Chapman Avenue Cross Section 4-1nart WK11-aped 4-hXd S dewak medlim I � Ply 1&f0&PWft" 3 travel Isnea, iypiral �Ir 3 travel Yrtes. iypfical �IV loft MR 16ft 351t "an UIllnste RVd-&-way: 106 ft I Alro Way has two travel lanes, a 4-foot wide sidewalk and a 6-foot wide parkway within its 60- foot right-of-way and is designated as a Local Street, as depicted below. Exhibit 4.4-26 Alro Way Cross Section 6-foot parkway 4-foot sidewalk I 1 travel 10-foot parkway I lane each iii direction 10 R Right -of --way. 60 ft 4-16 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Casa Vista Street has one travel lane in each direction and a 4-foot wide sidewalk with a 6-foot wide parkway within its 60-foot wide right-of-way and is designated as a Local Street, as depicted below. Exhibit 4.4-27 Casa Vista Street Cross Section 4-foot sidewalk 4-foot sidewalk Y� 6-foot parkway 6-� Yr parkway 1 travel lane each direction loft 40ft loft J Rightof�xraY so ft Vermont Avenue has one travel land in each direction and 9-foot wide sidewalks with 5-foot wide tree wells within its 66-foot wide right-of-way and is designated as a Local Street. The exhibit below shows the Vermont Avenue cross section condition. Exhibit 4.4-28 Vermont Avenue Cross Section 9-foot sidewalk 9400t sidewalk well 5400t �5-foot treetravel lane each d iecUo� wetil 9ft 48ft 9ft Right=of-vray: 66 ft Wilken Way has one travel lane in each direction, 4-foot wide sidewalks and 6-foot wide parkways within a 60-foot wide right-of-way and is designated as a Local Street. The exhibit below shows the Wilken Way cross section condition. 4.0 Public Facilities Plan Exhibit 4.4-29 Wilken Way Cross Section 4-foot sidewalk 4-foot sidewalk I 64bot parkway 6-foot parkway 1 travel lane each direction W loft 401t loft Right way. 60 It r Zeyn Street has one travel lane in each direction, 4-foot wide sidewalks and 6-foot wide parkways within a 60-foot wide right -of way and is designated as a Local Street. The exhibit below shows the Zeyn Street cross section condition. Exhibit 4.4-30 Zeyn Street Cross Section 4-foot sidewalk 4-foot sidewalk I 6-foot parkway 6-foot parkway 1 travel lane each direction loft 40ft loft Right-0f way 60 ft 4-17 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 4.5 Transit Plans To minimize automobile traffic on local streets, existing and proposed transit systems will service uses within the ARSP area. The main component of the existing system is the Orange County Transit Authority (OCTA) bus service to the ARSP area. Current bus routes are located on Harbor Boulevard, Katella Avenue and Ball Road, and provide regular service to The Anaheim Resort. 4.5.1 The Disneyland Resort The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan transports theme park visitors to the theme parks from public day -use parking facilities via pedestrian walkways, buses, tram services and monorail. These existing services could be expanded in the future to provide additional transit improvements. 4.5.2 East-West Transit Connection An East-West Transit Connection is contemplated to connect The Anaheim Resort and the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC). 4.5.3 HOV Lane System OCTA and Caltrans have developed a plan to construct a countywide system of transit ways and commuter HOV lanes in freeway corridors. These facilities will be used by regional 'express' buses, regular intercity buses, shuttle buses, vanpools, and carpools. Buses and other HOVs would access or egress these facilities at exclusive HOV ramps to streets or at designated at -grade merge locations along freeways. HOV lanes have been constructed on 1-5, State Route (SR) 57, and SR 22, with a direct HOV connection between SR-57 and 1-5. The HOV interchange at Gene Autry Way allows access to and from areas east and west of 1-5, including The Anaheim Resort and Angel Stadium of Anaheim. As part of a long-term project, 4.0 Public Facilities Plan exclusive HOV ramps have been identified at Cerritos Avenue on the SR-57. 4.5.4 Bus Service OCTA and Anaheim Transportation Network/Anaheim Regional Transportation provide bus service to and within The Anaheim Resort. 4.5.5 Intercity Commuter Rail Service Amtrak and Metrolink provide train service to The Anaheim Resort via stations in Fullerton and Anaheim. 4-18 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 4.6 Pedestrian Circulation Plans An increase in the number of hotel rooms and the development of new attractions will increase pedestrian activity in The Anaheim Resort. This will enhance the urban character of the area and will require that facilities be enhanced to meet the needs of these pedestrians. Exhibit 4.6-1 (Proposed Pedestrian Circulation) illustrates the pedestrian circulation system within the ARSP area and the surrounding areas. On this plan, public pedestrian routes have been identified. The primary destinations of pedestrians within The Anaheim Resort will include: • Hotels, restaurants and other businesses in The Anaheim Resort; • The Anaheim Convention Center; • The existing Disneyland theme park, Disney's California Adventure theme park, as described in The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and in the Theme Park (TP) East and West Overlays of the ARSP area; and • The East and West Parking Areas of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Parking District. Exhibit 4.6-2 (Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Points) depicts the pedestrian and vehicular access points, associated with Disneyland Forward, within the ARSP Theme Park East and Parking Overlays. This exhibit also describes the locations of existing and potential bridges. Areas where pedestrian bridges may be installed serve as a key connector over public street rights -of -way, connecting users from one side of the street to the other without having to impede traffic flow. Pedestrian bridges were constructed over Disneyland Drive and Magic Way in the DRSP. Up to two additional pedestrian bridges or 4.0 Public Facilities Plan crossings will be constructed over Disneyland Drive as part of Disneyland Forward. At least one and up to three pedestrian bridges will be constructed over Harbor Boulevard, at least one of which will be constructed in conjunction with construction of a parking facility within the Parking Overlay and/or the DRSP East Parking Area. Exhibit 4.6-2 (Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Points) also describes the potential future pedestrian bridge over Katella Avenue connecting the DRSP Theme Park District to the PR District. Any pedestrian bridges constructed over public right-of-way will be required to obtain an encroachment license from the City. 4-19 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 4.6-1 1 Proposed Pedestrian Circulation vnrinLlt'i pve City ou Anaheim Ball Rd' 7i om, 4.0 Public Facilities Plan Oisrreyifznd l Q theme Part y t - - t Y'errlrs Ave - 0�•- � .Cerritos Ave- � a ` City of c 7. ,AB enfuie Anaheim L '' TCAhemeP,aik % _1_ Katella Ave - Center I 1 CNY BOUNDARY r — — — — — Orangewood _Ave I City of J Garden Grove 1 Clry 80111DARY, i NOTES: 1. Sidewalks are provided far oil public sheets unless shown on this e>fh)bh. Public sidewafks loaafed outside oT the bounaanes I I City of of The aheim sh Resort are not own on this eMlbff. AnMown 2. Unlit parking shure uctis conshre ucfetl In the East Parking Aa, _fOng pUbflc sidewalk to remain on the north side of Disney Way, west of Cfenentine Sheet. r Orange - — Chapman Ave — — — — Proposed Pedestrian Circulation LEGEND MAP FEATURES r• —, The Anahiem Public Pedestrian Route Resort Boundary The Anaheim Resort �— Specific Plan Boundary C J City Boundary It I Notre/Sources City Legal Lot Data, 2022 City Boundcry Data, 2022 0 750 I,soo Feet 4-20 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 4.6-2 1 Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Points 4.0 Public Facilities Plan -.44"41"t. me I Citj Of +�{' 1 Anaheim BallRd ' �t �} Ball'Rd' �� I� % r a, Dis"neylund�` 711eme� Park. , I I—tNdgig]p-afy- L % -Ce4itos Ave I ° �cP�. Cemfps Ave_ f r__-P City of ■ CA AdvehNrre Anaheim y� L — I Theme Palk - a % 1 - —7 �r - Katella Ave �^.s� �� " �I i J ` ^- .1 r—�I 1=,r ICafellaA,v_e_-_ coc.Anaheim n� I � CITY BO,UNOARY_I r — 1 FT- Orangewood'Ave .- J II I it F W _ _ CITY,BOUNDARY' NOTES: 1. P H.r bor Locations. between a Bridges: • Harbo fb k rtl, between Manchester Avenue and Disney Way. • Dmeyland 0,Ne, between Magic Way and Ktebb Avenue. City Ot • Katelte Avenue connecting the Anaheim Convention Center area to I _ l I r what h now Disney CONtomure ia Adventtheme park • 2. As at November 2021, there is bus/shuttle access, however. such Orange access m ybe removed ilahonsib center is movetltoth DRSP I— 1 — PaMng East OBMct t Parking Area or the adjacent ARSP Parking Overlay. I 3. The location of occess points maybe adjusted subject to Me approval of the City Engineer. Chapman Ave L— — •� Pedestrian Circulation Plan LEGEND MAP FEATURES Notes/sources City legal Lot Data, 2D22 �-j The Anaheim Resort Pedestrian and Vehicular Access Point in the City Boundary Data, 2022 Boundary Parking Overlay or Theme Park East Overlay The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Boundary J City Boundary 0 750 1,500 .{ Feet [� MARCH 2O24 4-21 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 4.7 Water The City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department provides water to the ARSP area. Its sources include both wells to tap groundwater resources, and water purchased from the Metropolitan Water District. Based on preliminary estimates, the average additional daily water consumption for The Anaheim Resort will be about 7 million gallons (including The Disneyland Resort). The existing water supply system consists of numerous water lines that surround or traverse the ARSP area. Modification of this system is necessary to provide water at the pressures and in the quantities needed to supply the ARSP area. The following is a list of the improvements that have been made to the water distribution system to support implementation of the ARSP. • Replacement of the 8-inch pipe in Clementine Street from Katella Avenue to Disney Way with a 20-inch pipe; • Replacement of the existing 10-inch pipe in Disney Way from Clementine Street to Harbor Boulevard with a 20-inch pipe; • Installation of a new well (Well 55) near the intersection of Clementine Street and Disney Way; • Replacement of the existing 10-inch pipe in Harbor Boulevard from Convention Way to Disney Way with a 20-inch pipe; • Replacement of the existing 10-inch pipe in Harbor Boulevard from Disney Way to Harbor Boulevard north of Manchester Avenue with a 16-inch pipe; • Replacement of the existing 12-inch pipe in Katella Avenue from Harbor Boulevard to Clementine Street with a 20-inch pipe; and, • Replacement of the existing 12-inch and 14- inch pipes in West Street/Disneyland Drive 4.0 Public Facilities Plan from Ball Road to Katella Avenue with a 20- inch pipe. The following additional improvements to the water distribution system will be made as part of the on -going implementation of the ARSP. • Installation of a 16-inch pipe in Harbor Boulevard from Orangewood Avenue to Chapman Avenue; and, • Provision for a new well to be constructed near the intersection of Haster Street and Orangewood Avenue. Additional information about water use, supply and improvements is provided in SEIR No. 340. If any analyses or conditions above demonstrate that improvements are necessary, those improvements would be regulated by Anaheim's Water Rates, Rules and Regulations, Water Services Administrative Procedures and Design Guidelines (APDG), and Water Services Standard Specifications (WSSS). The cost of all Main Extensions, Main Enlargements, abandonments, relocations, and easements documents are the responsibility of the owner or developer of the properties served by these mains in accordance with Rule 15A. Water conservation is an important part of the Plan and will be achieved through numerous measures intended to reduce water consumption. Among the measures to be implemented within the ARSP area to the extent applicable, include, but are not limited to, the following: • Low -flow sprinkler heads in irrigation systems; • Waterway recirculation systems; • Low -flow fittings, fixtures, and equipment, including low flush toilets and urinals; • Efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation, low flow irrigation heads, automatic 4-22 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) irrigation scheduling equipment, flow sensing controls, rain sensors, soil moisture sensors and other water conserving equipment; • Low -flow shower heads in hotels; • Water efficient ice -machines, dishwashers, clothes washers and other water -using appliances; • Irrigation systems used primarily at night when evaporation rates are lowest; • Provision of information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water conservation; • Water conserving landscape plant materials; wherever feasible; and, • Construction of separate irrigation lines and implementation of recycled water when it becomes available. In addition to these measures, development in the ARSP area will comply with Chapter 10.18 (Water Conservation and Water Shortage Contingency Rules and Regulations) and chapter 10.19 (Landscape Water Efficiency Ordinance) of Title 10 Anaheim Municipal Code, and Guidelines for Implementation of the City of Anaheim Landscape Water Efficiency Ordinance. 4.0 Public Facilities Plan 4-23 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 4.8 Sanitary Sewer The ARSP area is served by local sewer lines owned and maintained by the City of Anaheim. Wastewater in the local sewer lines generally flows south and then west to the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSAN) sewer trunks. Wastewater from the ARSP area is conveyed through City and OCSAN sewer trunks and interceptors to the OCSAN Treatment Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. The Central Anaheim Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers (adopted by Anaheim City Council on January 9, 2018, by Resolution No. 2018-001) analyzed sewer system capacity in the ARSP area. This plan identified the new regional sewer lines to be constructed specifically for continued buildout development within the ARSP area. As specific projects with detailed information on precise location, project statistics, and precise sewer loading become available, sewer studies may be required to determine if additional local improvements are required. 4.0 Public Facilities Plan 4-24 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 4.9 Storm Drain Storm water from the northern portion of the ARSP area will flow west in new or existing underground storm drains to the Anaheim -Barber Channel, located several hundred feet west of, and parallel to Walnut Street as identified in the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for Anaheim Barber City Channel Tributary Area June 2009 (adopted by Anaheim City Council on October 27, 2009 by Resolution No. 2009-163). Storm water from the southern portion of the ARSP area will flow south to the East Garden Grove- Wintersburg Channel as identified in the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Tributary Area January 2006 (adopted by Anaheim City Council on March 7, 2006 by Resolution No. 2006-029). Eventually, the storm water from the entire ARSP area empties into the ocean at Huntington Harbor. The following is a list of the planned facilities to be constructed to handle the storm water flows from the ARSP area: • A relief drain in Harbor Boulevard, Vermont Avenue and East Street; • An upgrade drain in Ball Road; • A parallel or relief drain in Cerritos Avenue, Walnut Street and Magic Way; • An upgrade or parallel storm drain in Katella Avenue and an upgrade drain and new storm drain line north of it in Anaheim Boulevard; • An upgrade drain in Manchester Avenue; • New storm drain lines in Guinida Lane, Palm Street and Winston Road; • A parallel or upgrade drain in Orangewood Avenue, Harbor Boulevard and Wilken Way; • A relief drain in Haster Street and Gene Autry Way. 4.0 Public Facilities Plan • A parallel or upgrade drain in Hotel Way All new development and/or redevelopment projects shall participate in the City's Master Plan of Drainage and related Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Programs to assist in mitigating storm drainage system deficiencies as described in SEIR No. 340. With approval of Disneyland Forward, the following additional storm drain improvements will be required: • With development of the Southeast District of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and the Theme Park East Overlay, connections to the existing storm drains in surrounding streets would be required; and, • Disney will continue to comply with the Master Water Quality Management Plan, which applies to all Disney Properties in The Anaheim Resort. 25 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 4.10 Electricity Electricity for the ARSP area is provided by the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Electric utilities are installed underground in accordance with City Electrical Construction Standards, the Electric Rates, Rules and Regulations, and the Development Standards and Guidelines for The Anaheim Resort. Full implementation of the ARSP will increase the demand for electricity by approximately 291.7 million kilowatt hours annually and an estimated 799,344 kilowatt hours on an average day. The estimated net increase in electrical demand associated with implementation of the ARSP area is 110.5 million volt amperes. The load could be higher if theme park uses are moved from the DRSP Theme Park District to the ARSP Theme Park East and West Overlays. As part of an existing City of Anaheim Capital Improvement Program, the existing overhead electric utilities on Katella Avenue, West Street/ Disneyland Drive, and Harbor Boulevard were placed underground. The undergrounding was completed prior to or at the same time that the area street improvements were completed. New lines constructed to serve the area will also be placed underground. A new substation facility was constructed at the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and Zeyn Street in November 2019. In order to conserve energy, the owner or developer shall implement energy saving practices which may include the following: • High -efficiency air-conditioning with EMS (computer) control; Variable air volume (VAV) distribution • Outside air (100%) economizer cycle; 4.0 Public Facilities Plan • Staged compressors or variable speed drives to flow varying thermal loads; • Isolated HVAC zone control by floors/separable activity areas; • Specification of premium -efficiency electric motors (i.e., compressor motors, air -handling units, and fan -coil units); • Use of occupancy sensors in appropriate spaces; • Use of compact fluorescent lamps; • Use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps; • Use of light emitting diode (LED) or equivalent energy -efficient lighting for outdoor lighting; • Use of Energy Star@ exit lighting or exit signage; • Use of T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts where applications of standard fluorescent fixtures are identified; • Use of lighting power controllers in association with metal -halide or high- pressure sodium (high intensity discharge) lamps for outdoor lighting and parking lots; • Consideration of thermal energy storage air- conditioning for spaces or facilities that may require air-conditioning during summer, day - peak periods; • For swimming pools and spas, incorporate solar heating, automatic covers, and efficient pumps and motors, as feasible; and, • Participation in energy efficiency incentive programs. The Public Utilities Department will coordinate with property owners and developers to incorporate feasible renewable energy generation measures, including but not be limited to the use of solar and small wind turbine 4-26 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) sources on new and existing facilities and the use of solar powered lighting in parking areas. In addition, new building construction will be required to exceed Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings at the time of building permit application by at least 10 percent. 4.11 Natural Gas Natural gas for the ARSP area will be delivered by Southern California Gas Company, which maintains both standard and high pressure gas lines in the vicinity of the ARSP area. Wherever practical, development within the ARSP area will be required to incorporate energy -saving means into the project to reduce consumption of natural gas. In addition, many of the energy conservation measures described in Section 4.10 above will also result in natural gas savings. 4.12 Telephone Services AT&T provides telephone, digital cable, and high- speed internet services to the ARSP area. Existing facilities are located in the developed areas surrounding the ARSP area. The infrastructure capacity for telephone service typically expands with new development. 4.13 Television/Cable Service Time Warner Cable currently provides both fiber and coaxial feeds in the ARSP area for a variety of services including, but not limited to, standard and high definition cable television service, PRI T1 telephony circuit(s), cable television service, high speed internet, and digital telephone service. 4.0 Public Facilities Plan 4.14 Solid Waste Solid waste from the ARSP area will be collected by a City contracted disposal company. Collected waste is processed through Republic Waste Services of Southern California LLC's Regional Material Resource Recovery Facility (MRF). The facility contains an 800-foot-long automated and manual sorter/conveyor system that separates more than 70 types of recyclables. Remaining non -recyclable waste is processed and consolidated before delivery to the Brea-Olinda Alpha landfill in unincorporated Orange County adjacent to the City of Brea. In addition to the processing of collected waste at the MRF for recyclable materials, one or more solid waste reduction programs may be required of new development, including but not limited to: • Facilitating recycling by providing chutes or convenient locations for sorting and recycling bins; • Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially in retail areas) by providing adequate space and centralized locations for collection and storing; • Facilitating glass recycling (especially from restaurants) by providing adequate space for sorting and storing; • Providing trash compactors for non - recyclable materials whenever feasible to reduce the total volume of solid waste and the number of trips required for collection; • Prohibiting curbside pick-up; and, • Providing the following on -going practices during project operations as feasible: o Use of recycled paper products for stationery, letterhead, and packaging; o Recovery of materials such as aluminum and cardboard; o Collection of office paper for recycling; 4-27 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) o Collection of polystyrene (foam) cups for recycling; and o Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser printer toner cartridges, oil, batteries, and scrap metal for recycling or recovery. Property owners that develop in accordance with the ARSP will be required to implement a Waste Management Plan that includes, but is not limited to: • Detailing the location and design of on -site recycling facilities; • Providing on -site recycling receptacles to encourage recycling; • Complying with all Federal, State, County, and City regulations for hazardous material disposal; and, • Participating in the City's "Recycle Anaheim" program or any additional substitute programs as developed by the City. 4.15 Public Services The City Fire Department, in conjunction with the Utilities Department has set the minimum standards for water flow for the ARSP area. In addition, they will review all future development for compliance with City Fire Department standards. Typical requirements include the installation of sprinklers in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code, preparation of emergency fire access and construction fire protection plans, provision of adequate access to structures for fire fighting vehicles and location of fire hydrants in conveniently accessible locations. Since continued development in the ARSP area will increase the number of service calls to the Fire Department, new development shall be required to participate in fair share funding of the 4.0 Public Facilities Plan following measures intended to improve fire protection: • One additional fire truck company; • One additional paramedic company; • Modifications to existing fire stations to accommodate the additional fire units, additional manpower, equipment and facilities; • A vehicle equipped with specialty tools and equipment to enable the Fire Department to provide heavy search and rescue response capability; and, • A medical triage vehicle/trailer, equipped with sufficient trauma dressings, medical supplies, stretchers, etc., to handle 1,000 injured persons, and an appropriate storage facility. The Anaheim Fire Department will provide the following list of services: • Development Project Meetings; • Preconstruction Plan Review; • Preplanning for firefighting and evacuations; • All new construction inspections; • All state mandated CUPA inspections; • All state mandated and non -state mandated annual fire inspections; • Review and inspections of all special event permits; • Monitoring of pyrotechnics and special effects; and, • Interconnected Safety System (ISS) Testing. 4-28 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 4.0 Public Facilities Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) The Anaheim Police Department provides law enforcement services to the ARSP area. The Police Department is divided into four service districts (Central [Main], South, East, and West) each containing a police station. The ARSP is located within the Central District and is seared by the Central Station. Law enforcement services to be provided by the Police Department include traffic control and enforcement, narcotics violations, crime control, community and tourist regulation, detention facilities, various investigations, and patrol. The additional police service personnel needed for the development of The Anaheim Resort will be funded through annual tax proceeds and incremental growth in and around The Anaheim Resort 4-29 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) This page is intentionally blank. 4.0 Public Facilities Plan 4-30 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 5.0 Design Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 5.0 DESIGN PLAN The Design Plan contains descriptions of the basic concepts that will help achieve the ARSP's fundamental goal of creating a unified resort identity for the ARSP area. Written text in this Section describes the fundamental design concepts, while the drawings that accompany the text show how the concepts will be implemented. The Design Plan has been coordinated with several adopted documents that describe design concepts for the ARSP area. These documents include The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program, and The Anaheim Resort Identity Program. In addition, this Section is intended to supplement the Zoning and Development Standards contained in Section 7.0, which is codified as Chapter 18.118 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Since the public streets are the interface between the ARSP and The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, both specific plans describe in detail the design of the public streets, as well as the treatment of setback areas adjacent to public streets. The emphasis in both plans is on creating unity through landscape design, a standardized design vocabulary for streetscape elements (such as light poles and directional signs), and regulation of private property, including standards for signs, building heights, and setbacks. For ease of reference and to better depict the relationship between the two specific plans, the ARSP contains information about the treatment of all public streets that border or are within the ARSP area boundaries. As a result, there is an overlap in the information contained in both specific plans along the border between the two areas. For example, the description and 5-1 illustrations of the design concept for Harbor Boulevard appear in both specific plans. On September 20, 1994, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 94R-239 approving The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program. Subsequent amendments have been adopted as described in the Program document on file in the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department. The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program summarizes landscape concepts proposed for the public streets within The Anaheim Resort and provides a general overview of the different landscape treatments that will help create a unifying resort identity. The ARSP is also consistent with The Anaheim Resort Identity Program approved by the City Council by adoption of Resolution No. 94R-238. Subsequent amendments have been adopted as described in the Program document on file in the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department. The Anaheim Resort Identity Program contains specific recommendations for the location and design of gateways, directional signs, banners, light fixtures, street furniture, and potential pedestrian bridges or crossings for The Anaheim Resort. Section 5.5, Identity Concept Plan, of the ARSP summarizes how signs and other identity elements will help create the unified environment envisioned for the entire Anaheim Resort area. The information in this Section supplements the Zoning and Development Standards contained in Section 7.0 in the following ways. First, it describes the fundamental design ideas and concepts that are the basis for the standards and regulations. This description of the basic concepts will assist in the interpretation of the intent of the ARSP in situations where several options may be consistent with the regulations. Also, it contains design guidelines that would be The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 5.0 Design Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) considered too general to be standards or regulations but convey useful information about the character and quality of development anticipated within the ARSP area. Finally, this Section contains sketches, cross -sections and photos that show what the physical appearance of important conditions in the ARSP area should be if the standards, regulations, and guidelines are implemented in accordance with this section and Section 7.0. By showing how the two work together, the intent of the ARSP can be conveyed in a more comprehensive manner. In addition to this introduction, this Section is divided into eight parts, including: • 5.1 Design Plan Objectives; • 5.2 Design Concepts; • 5.3 Landscape Concept Plan; • 5.4 Landscape Cross Sections; • 5.5 Identity Concept Plan; • 5.6 Design Criteria for the Public Realm; • 5.7 Design Criteria for the Setback Realm; and, • 5.8 Design Criteria for the Private Realm. 5.1 Design Plan Objectives The Design Plan is intended to achieve three principal design objectives. They are: • Create visual continuity between the ARSP area and the adjacent Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area; • Create a high quality, visually appealing, pedestrian -oriented environment; • Create landscape and design standards and regulations to reinforce the area's identity; and, 5-2 • Enhance Public Views of the Theme Parks, including Back -of -House Uses, From Public Walkways and Streets. The following are descriptions of each of these objectives. 5.1.1 Create Visual Continuity between the ARSP Area and the Adjacent Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Area An important objective of the ARSP is to visually tie the ARSP area to the adjacent Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area through the consistent use of landscape and other streetscape elements including signs, gateways, lights and other elements. The Anaheim Resort will then have a more unified identity, and there will be a smooth transition from the ARSP area and The Dis- neyland Resort Specific Plan Area. 5.1.2 Create a High Quality, Visually Appealing, Pedestrian -Oriented Environment A second design objective is to create a high quality pedestrian environment that reinforces the urban character of the ARSP area. With the development of Disney's California Adventure theme park and new theme park attractions within the ARSP area, construction of the new public parking facilities in The Disneyland Resort, and the increase in the number of visitor accommodations both within The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and the ARSP, there will be a measurable increase in the number of pedestrians in the area. Anticipated improvement and expansion of the Anaheim Convention Center will also contribute significantly to the increase in pedestrians. This will help support an active street environment for shopping, dining and lodging within walking distance from the theme parks and the Anaheim Convention Center. The Design Plan addresses the needs of pedestrians by: The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) • Establishing the size and location of pedestrian walks; • Defining the type of landscape necessary to create a pedestrian scale; and, • Providing for other amenities, such as directional signs, intended to enhance the overall pedestrian experience. 5.1.3 Create Landscape and Design Guidelines to Reinforce the Area's Identity The Design Plan also provides landscape guidelines for the setback areas and along the public streets that pass through the center of the ARSP area in order to reinforce the overall consistency of the area's identity. The setback landscape will also help provide a continuity ele- ment in front of existing buildings that have a variety of architectural styles. In addition, the Design Plan includes design guidelines intended to support the overall quality of development in the ARSP area by establishing sound minimum criteria for private development. 5.1.4 Enhance Public Views of the Theme Parks, including Back -of -House Uses, From Public Walkways and Streets. A fourth design objective is to enhance public views of theme park uses, from public walkways and streets through a variety of design interventions. Leading up to the theme parks, visitors outside the park utilize public walkways and streets to access theme park uses. As visitors make their way to and from theme park uses, landscaping and walls/fencing are utilized at the pedestrian level to screen on -site buildings and structures, enhance the visual experience, and add to the sense of anticipation and arrival. Buildings and structures are treated with varying design elements based on height and visibility from public walkways and streets in order to 5-3 5.0 Design Plan enhance the experience of visitors outside of and leading up to the theme park uses. 5.2 Design Concepts The concepts described below are the basic design policies for the ARSP area and form the basis for implementation of the Design Plan. They address the objectives of the Design Plan described in Section 5.1, Design Plan Objectives, and include a description of the important site factors that will affect implementation of the design concepts. 5.2.1 Transform and Unify with Landscape The primary concept of the Design Plan is to transform the visual character of The Anaheim Resort with landscape. The primary component of this transformation will be the streetscape, which includes trees and shrubs, as well as man- made elements such as light fixtures, benches, entry gateways, and signs. Setback areas on private land between the public street and buildings are also important in this transformation. In some instances, the visible portions of buildings and private land behind the setbacks will also play a role in defining the character of the ARSP area. 5.2.2 Create a District with a Grand Scale The Anaheim Resort encompasses approximately 1,078 acres, a large urban area in which to create a unified identity. In addition, many of the streets within The Anaheim Resort are wide and provide important regional circulation linkages. Finally, the number of visitors to the area is flexibility significant and will grow with development of the Anaheim Resort and The Disneyland Resort Specific Plans. Consequently, the character of The Anaheim Resort as a whole must be grand in scale to complement the size and importance of the area The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) as a world -class destination resort. The Design Plan proposes creating a grand scale primarily with large-scale landscape plantings and architectural regulations, including building heights and setbacks. 5.2.3 Emphasize Landscaping on Public Streets Most visitors to the ARSP area and the adjacent Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area will experience the area's streets at some time during their visit, either from automobiles, other vehicles (such as the pedestrian and/or transportation system(s) or monorail discussed in The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan), or on foot. Nearly all of the publicly -owned land within both areas is contained within the street rights -of -way (or in easements), though the space available for landscaping within the public right-of-way will be somewhat limited because of the need to serve vehicle and pedestrian circulation. Streets and their edges furnish the primary space in which landscaping can be placed to transform the identity of The Anaheim Resort. Where new rights -of -way are being created, sufficient space will be provided within the right-of-way to accommodate the proposed landscape. 5-4 5.0 Design Plan Exhibit 5.2-1 Utilize the Streets for Landscaping 5.2.4 Orient Visitors Visually Visitors to the ARSP area and the adjacent Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area often come from great distances and lack familiarity with Anaheim and The Anaheim Resort. These visitors need well-defined visual cues that orient them to their location within the area. In addition, there is great variety in the different uses and functions of the spaces within the ARSP area, and the scale of the spaces often varies as well. The Design Plan differentiates the major streets within the ARSP area by establishing landscape treatments that will help create a unique character for each. 5.2.5 Create a Recognizable Center for the Anaheim Resort In coordination with The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, the Design Plan establishes an area known as the Central Core, which will have special design standards. It includes parcels located on Harbor Boulevard between Interstate 5 and Orangewood Avenue, and on Katella Avenue between Interstate 5 and Walnut Street. For parcels adjacent to Harbor Boulevard and to Katella Avenue, special design standards will The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) apply to setbacks and streetscape treatments that are different from other locations in The Anaheim Resort. 5.2.6 Coordinate Streetscape Improvements with Other Improvements The construction of the streetscape improvements in the ARSP area will be coordinated to the extent feasible with public and private improvements, such as the undergrounding of utilities. The intent is to install public streetscape improvements as soon as possible, while minimizing the need to disrupt these improvements once they have been installed. 5.2.7 Establish a Clear Design Hierarchy The ARSP specifies three distinct levels of design hierarchy called the Public Realm, the Setback Realm, and the Private Realm. The intent is that the most visually prominent areas have the most rigorous design controls, and that the design of less visually prominent areas be more flexible. Exhibit 5.2-2 The Three Elements of the Design Hierarchy. The Public Realm, The Setback Realm, and the Private Realm Public Setback Private Realm Realm Realm Buiding Envelope Ultimate Pubic Building : Buildable Right-of--%hy I Setback I Portion Areas within the ultimate public right-of-way are called the Public Realm. This visually prominent area is the most precisely defined and designed 5-5 5.0 Design Plan of the three Realms. The Public Realm concepts for the entire Anaheim Resort area are regulated by The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Plan. The Setback and Private Realm concepts are regulated for the respective specific plan areas by the Anaheim Resort and Disneyland Resort Specific Plans. The Setback Realm includes the private property between the ultimate right -of way and the required minimum building setback. Since these areas are not quite as significant to the overall character of the ARSP area as the Public Realm, the plan provides for more flexibility in their design. The Private Realm, which includes areas behind building setbacks adjacent to public streets, is guided by design criteria that are the most flexible of the three realms, but still contain important design guidelines intended to enhance the overall identity of the ARSP area. Development of the Private Realm will occur with less predictability than the other Realms, and so less specificity is provided in the design guidelines. Additional discussion of the three Realms can be found in Subsections 5.6, 5.7, and 5.8. 6.3 Landscape Concept Plan This section of the Design Plan describes the landscape design principles for the ARSP area that will contribute to the unified environment envisioned by the Plan. It contains a description of the basic landscape concepts, criteria for the selection of plant material, and general planting design guidelines for the public streets and adjacent setbacks, which the Plan calls the Public Realm and the Setback Realm. The Landscape Concept Diagram (Exhibit 3.9-9 of The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program) shows how the principles have been applied to the important streets in The Anaheim Resort. Section 5.4, Landscape Cross Sections, illustrates the basic landscape design principles. The adopted Anaheim Resort Public Realm and Landscape Program and Anaheim Resort Identity The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT Program regulate the Public Realm within The Anaheim Resort. The landscape design drawings, photos and landscape cross sections found in this Section and Section 5.4, Landscape Cross Sections, illustrate basic landscape design concepts, and, unless needed to illustrate a concept described in the text, do not contain dimensions or other detailed information about street right-of-way widths or minimum setback dimensions. Informa- tion about street rights -of way and minimum setbacks can be found in Section 4.3, Vehicular Circulation Plan, and Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards, respectively. 5.3.1 Plant Material Selection and Use The purpose of this subsection is to: • Describe the basic plant selection criteria for the plants that will be used in the ARSP area; • Describe the role each type of plant (tree, shrub, ground cover) will play in establishing the overall character of the ARSP area; and, • Identify in a general way where and how each type will be used. The information in this subsection is supplemented by a detailed plant palette in Planning Standard Detail No. 10, which contains a list of plants recommended for use in the ARSP area. The purpose here is to provide the rationale that serves as the basis for the plant palette. 6.3.1.1 Basic Selection Criteria The desirable attributes of plants to be used in the ARSP area include: • Climate appropriate; • Drought tolerant and/or low water using; • Reasonably low in maintenance; • Relatively free from disease and pest infestation, 5-6 5.0 Design Plan • Outstanding in some characteristic, such as form, color, bark, etc.; • Unlikely to be familiar outside subtropical areas; • Evergreen; • Native to Southern California; • Moderate or fast in growth; and, • Suitable for use around people. The intent is to establish an overall appearance that has connection to Southern Californian character while also integrating plants that are climate -appropriate and/or low water using. There is virtually no list of plants that could be developed that would completely satisfy all of these conditions. The intent is to provide a list from which plants can be selected that will provide the best plants to respond to the needs of different uses/functions in the ARSP area, as well as the flexibility to be used in a variety of different situations. 6.3.1.2 Tree Selection and Use Criteria Trees will be the backbone plant material of the planting design because of the size and widespread presence in the street rights -of -way and setback areas. The following describes the different types of tree forms that will be used throughout the ARSP area, and the criteria that will be used to determine how they will be used. Small canopy trees: Small canopy trees are intended for use where it is desirable to create a more intimate scale (such as along narrow streets or in pedestrian areas), where a contrast with a larger tree will help reinforce the layered landscape concept, or to contrast with a tree with a distinctly different form. On wide streets where the separation between trees from one side of the street to another (or from a parkway to a The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) median planting) is thirty feet or greater, small canopy trees should always be combined with medium or large canopy trees. Small canopy trees will have a mature height of at least twenty feet, but not more than forty feet. Their mature spread will be approximately equal to their height. Along streets with regularly spaced trees, small canopy trees will be planted at a rate of one tree for each twenty to thirty lineal feet of frontage; spreading trees may require a somewhat wider spacing. Medium canopy trees: Medium canopy trees may serve the same purposes as either the large or small canopy trees. Typically, they will have a mature height of at least thirty feet but will not typically exceed sixty feet. Their mature spread will approximately equal their height. Along streets with regularly spaced trees, medium canopy trees will be planted at a rate of one tree for each twenty-five to thirty-five lineal feet of frontage; spreading trees may require a somewhat wider spacing. Medium canopy trees may be used on local or secondary streets but should not be used alone on arterial roads or other streets greater than sixty feet wide unless there is a landscaped median. Exhibit 5.3-1 Medium Canopy Trees 5-7 5.0 Design Plan Large canopy trees: Large canopy trees will be used on arterial roads to help reinforce the grand, civic scale of The Anaheim Resort landscape. They are intended to be large scale elements that create a strong, positive visual impression. Their mature height will not be less than fifty feet and may exceed eighty feet. For the smaller trees in this category, the spread will approximately equal the mature height, while in larger trees the spread will typically be 50% to 75% of the height. Along streets with regularly spaced trees, large canopy trees will be planted at a rate of one tree for each thirty to forty lineal feet of frontage; spreading trees may require a somewhat wider spacing. Large canopy trees may also be used in setback areas that exceed twenty feet in width and may be planted in masses. Exhibit 5.3-2 Large Canopy Trees The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Vertical and Pyramidal trees: Vertical trees have a mature height that dramatically exceeds their mature width. Vertical trees will have a ratio of height to width not less than 4:1, but which may (in the case of certain varieties of palm) exceed 20:1. Vertical trees will range in height from 30 to 100 feet when mature. The spacing of vertical trees will typically be from eight feet to thirty feet on center for streets on which they are regularly spaced, depending on the ultimate size and spread of the specific tree. When the primary purpose is screening, vertical trees will be evergreen and will be spaced so that the mature trees form a dense visual barrier. When used in the Public Realm, vertical trees will generally be used in combination with canopy trees, especially areas with pedestrians, who will need canopy trees to provide shade. Vertical trees are especially useful in narrow setback areas as a contrast with lower growing canopy trees or shrubs to create the layered landscape. Vertical and pyramidal trees are intended to serve a variety of purposes. Among these are: • Screening views of adjacent uses or property; • Establishing regular, easily recognizable geometric patterns; and, • Providing a dramatic vertical expression that stands out from the surrounding landscape. Pyramidal trees have a characteristic shape like a pyramid, and benefit from having space that permits their lower branches to touch the ground. Many needle -leafed evergreens, such as pine and cedar trees, belong to this category. Pyramidal trees will be used as screens, as large-scale backdrop, in formal rows within setbacks, or, where space permits, as large specimens. 5-8 5.0 Design Plan Exhibit 5.3-3 Vertical and Pyramidal Trees 6.3.1.3 Shrub, Vine and Ground Cover Selection and Use Criteria This subsection explains the role that will be played by shrubs, vines and ground cover to support the basic design established by the trees. Shrubs: Shrubs will serve several main design purposes to reinforce the basic landscape plan, including the following: • Screen views of surface parking lots, service areas, trash enclosures, and other sights that detract from the garden -like character envisioned for the area, or to provide privacy for pool areas, outdoor eating areas, and patios associated with ground floor hotel rooms; • Providing a physical barrier to discourage pedestrians from crossing streets mid -block, or to direct pedestrian and vehicular traffic; and, • Introducing an intermediate to low layer within a layered landscape. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 5.0 Design Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 5.3-4 Use of Shrubs to Screen Surface Parking Lots A large range of shrub species with varying heights will be utilized to create an identity and diversity within the planting palette in order to not be dominated by a single species. Shrubs will often appear as either loose (unclipped) or formal (clipped) hedges of consistent height. Shrubs that are very low growing (less than two feet tall), and that spread widely will be used as a ground cover, while shrubs that grow taller (up to fifteen feet) will be used for screening. Exhibit 5.3-5 Formal (Clipped) Hedges Vary in Height ; l 5-9 Vines: Vines will be used for the following main purposes: • Creating a cloak to cover walls and buildings. For example, clinging vines will be used on parking facilities, buildings and walls to enhance building elevations, and will help discourage graffiti; • Creating vertical and hanging gardens. Vines will be trained to the trunks of palms in order to enhance their appearance at the pedestrian level and will be used in planters on parking facilities or other buildings. Vines will also be used on garden structures such as arbors and trellises, especially where limited planting area precludes a more traditional planting of trees and shrubs; and, • Establishing a sprawling ground cover in large areas where the vine's growth can be contained in the available space. Ground Cover: In addition to spreading, low growing shrubs and sprawling vines, ground covers include turf and other grasses, low growing annuals, and other varieties of plants that do not generally exceed two or three feet in height at maturity. Large areas of landscape will be planted with low water -using ground covers in order to reduce water usage and long-term maintenance costs. The use of turf as a ground cover will be limited to particular areas where its smooth, green, manicured appearance and ability to accommodate light pedestrian traffic is needed. Generally, ground covers will be used to create a green or colored blanket over the ground. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 5.3-6 Ground Cover Includes Turf and Other Grasses, Annuals, and Other Varieties of Plants 5.3.2 Layered Landscape Design Criteria This subsection describes in more detail the layered landscape concept and provides criteria that will be used to design areas in the Setback Realm designated to have a layered landscape treatment. Since planting in both the Public Realm and adjacent Setback Realm will be needed to create a layered landscape, successful implementation requires that planting in both reinforce each other. As a result, setback landscaping will vary depending on the treatment of adjacent Public Realm landscape. Implementation of the layered landscape is most important in two areas: along Katella Avenue and Harbor Boulevard, the two major streets within the Central Core; as an additional device to create a unified appearance; and, adjacent to large parking facilities, which will benefit from the articulation of the building facade provided by the variation in the size and height of plant material. Such effective articulation for these buildings would be difficult to provide only with architecture. While construction of the layered 5-10 5.0 Design Plan landscape in the Public Realm will be achieved in large continuous sections of street, layered landscape in the Setback Realm will be constructed in smaller pieces as individual parcels develop or are renovated. Achievement of the layered landscape look will depend on the successful enforcement of the concept on numerous parcels over a number of years. The length of the street frontage of individual parcels is the most important factor that will influence implementation of the layered landscape. Parcel frontages of more than five hundred lineal feet are long enough to provide the variation needed to create the layered landscape look within a single parcel, while frontages of less than three hundred feet are too short to provide much variation. Therefore, areas that have many parcels with short frontages will require special consideration. Exhibits 5.3-7 (Layered Landscape Design Criteria for Properties with Frontages Greater than 300 Feet) and 5.3-8 (Layered Landscape Design Criteria for Properties with Frontages Less than 300 Feet) illustrate diagrammatically the criteria for creating layered landscape based on the length of parcel frontage. The width of the landscape setback will also affect the creation of the layered landscape. In order to create a layered landscape, there needs to be at least two horizontal or two vertical layers of landscape. This means that in narrow set- backs (10-20 feet wide), the selection of plant material is likely to be different than for medium (20-30 feet), or wide (greater than 30 feet) setbacks. Wider setbacks permit the use of a larger canopy or pyramidal trees, or will allow more than three layers in the Setback Realm alone. Exhibit 5.3-9 (Layered Landscape Setback Width Criteria) illustrates diagrammatically the criteria for creating layered landscape based on setback width. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 5.0 Design Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 5.3-7 Layered Landscape Design Criteria for Properties with Frontages Greater than 300 Feet Consistent street tree planting ibrms layers(s) in Pubic Realm (typical) Vertical or canopy tree greater than 50 ft tall at maturity Minimum length: 150 ft length for ground Tall shrub or small Medium shrub, 5-15 ft canopy tree, 10-25 ft tag tall at maturity Exhibit 5.3-8 Layered Landscape Design Criteria for Properties with Frontages Less than 300 Feet Consistent with street tree Within Setback Realm, each property planting forms layer(s) in must match the layered landscape of Public Realm (typical) one of its adjacent neighbors Property A Property Property C ' 1 5-11 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 5.3-9 Layered Landscape Setback Width Criteria Typical plant material "envelope" 1a1sff Minimum of 2 horizontal and 3 vertical layers in narrow width setback areas Alternate use of medium scale plant permitted (typical) ME mmm 15-25 ft Minimum of 3 horizontal and 3 vertical layers in medium width setback areas 5.0 Design Plan Larger scale plants should be used on wider setbacks 25-45 ft Minimum of 3 horizontal and 3 vertical layers in wide setback areas Each layer shall be landscaped. The number and size of trees shall be balanced between all layers. See Exhibit 5.3-10 (Tree Density Factor Plan) for size and number of trees in the setback areas. 5-12 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 5.3.3 Minimum Tree Density The Design Plan identifies trees as a critical element necessary to create a civic scale, and trees are also needed to establish the layered landscape envisioned for the Setback Realm. Trees in the setbacks adjacent to public streets also support the landscaping proposed for the Public Realm. Therefore, both the size and number of trees, which are to be planted in the Setback Realm are regulated by the minimum landscape requirement. To permit flexibility and design creativity in landscape design, the minimum landscape requirement recognizes that the effect of planting many smaller sized trees is comparable to the effect created by planting fewer large trees. Therefore, the regulation allows for variation in the size and number of trees. However, the Setback Realm landscaping adjacent to public streets must also be in conformance with the requirements identified in Subsection 5.3.2, Layered Landscape Design Criteria, which requires a balanced number of trees/plants/shrubs to be planted within the various landscaping layers. Refer to Planning Standard Detail No. 10 for relevant tree spacing recommendations. 6.3.3.1 Tree Density to Vary According to Adjacent Use The Design Plan also recognizes that the density of trees adjacent to some types of uses should be different than the density adjacent to others. The densest tree planting will be required adjacent to residential uses. Dense planting will also be required when intended to screen an area as in the case adjacent to parking structures or service areas. The least dense planting will be required adjacent to the public right-of-way for hotels, restaurants, or other visitor -serving uses where visibility to the public is important. 5-13 5.0 Design Plan 5.3.3.2 The Tree Density Factor To differentiate one tree density from another, all final landscape plans submitted to the City for approval will be required to show the Tree Density Factor for each landscape area. To establish the Tree Density Factor, all trees planted in the setback areas will have a point value based upon their size at installation. The point value varies depending on the size of the tree: large trees have a higher point value than small trees (the actual values are defined below). The Tree Density Factor for any landscape area is defined as the sum of the point values for all trees installed divided by the total area required to be landscaped. The ARSP establishes three levels of tree density, as indicated in Table 5.3-1 Levels of Tree Density. Table 5.3-1 Levels of Tree Density Tree Density Tree Level Density Factor Screening adjacent to sensitive areas, for Very Dense >_.8 example next to residential zones and the MHP Overlay Zone Screening adjacent to Dense >%5 to <.8 parking structures, interior property lines or the 1-5 freeways/ramps Landscaping adjacent to Moderately >.3 to <.5 the public right-of-way for Dense hotels, restaurants and other visitor -serving uses The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 5.3-10 (Tree Density Factor Plan), shows the location of each density of tree planting required by the plan adjacent to all public streets and to properties bordering the ARSP area. All trees are also subject to a minimum size at the time of installation. Refer to the Planning Standard Detail No. 10 for more information. The tree point values are defined in Table 5.3-2 (Tree Point Values). Table 5.3-2 Tree Point Values 5-gallon tree (minimum tree size permitted 5 points in the Setback Realm) 15 points 15-gallon tree 50 points 24-inch box canopy or vertical tree; Washingtonia or Brahea species palm with a trunk 125 points 36-inch box canopy or vertical tree; Washingtonia or Brahea species palm with a trunk:5 20 feet in height; Phoenix species palm with trunk < 5 feet in height 300 points 48-inch box canopy or vertical tree; Washingtonia or Brahea species palm with a trunk > 20 feet in height; Phoenix species palm with trunk:5 20 feet in height 600 points 60-inch box canopy or vertical tree; Phoenix species palm with trunk > 20 feet in height 1,200 points 72-inch box canopy or vertical tree The total number of points for a given landscape area within the setback must be equal to or greater than the product of the Tree Density Factor and the area to be landscaped. For example, a 10,000 square foot landscape area with a factor of .5 requires the total point value of trees planted in this area to equal or exceed 5,000 points. 5-14 5.0 Design Plan The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 5.3-101 Tree Density Factor Plan 5.0 Design Plan -vertnOnt:.Aye o City of �r _ : "Anaheim_ r �� • Ball Rd m°^. _ .....`L- w - iLj Bdl_I'.Rd. Cerriios Ave O If Q. City of+ Anaheim. -- L- Katella Ave I I CRY BOUNDARY J I a� City of Garden Grove Tree Density Factor Plan LEGEND The Anaheim Resort �-j Boundary The Anaheim Resort t� Specific Plan Boundary J City Boundary `% a,. or:�eyrar,e' ifieme. Park S flF :o_\� _Cemtos_Ave 0 o_ CA e rYlemr Park = ..� . I175, .. Katella Ave. i 9 `e � . I u — — — Orangewood_Ave R I � r� • ' � ---; � - - ... _ CITY BOUNUARY, — — —City Ot r Orange l s —J Chapman Ave I MAP FEATURES ttttttttt Moderately Dense -Tree Density Factor? 0.3 to <0.5 � Dense -Tree Density Factor? 0.5 to < 0.8 � Very Dense -Tree Density Factor>_ 0.8 t Central Core Intersection 5-15 Notes/Sources ary Legal Lot Data, 2022 ary Boundary Dal.. 2122 0 800 1,600 `■ Feet () MARCH 2O24 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 5.3.4 Plant Selection This subsection is intended to assist in the selection of plant material to be used within all three Realms of the ARSP area. Planning Standard Detail No. 10 contains two plant selection matrices: one for trees and another for shrubs, vines and ground cover. The plants listed in Planning Standard Detail No. 10 fulfill the planting design requirements contained in Subsection 5.3.1, Plant Materials Selection and Use, and identify the specific plant material that may be used to satisfy the landscape requirements in the Design Plan. Planning Standard Detail No. 10 identifies the trees by street location and Exhibit 5.4 (Landscape Cross Sections) identifies the location of application. Subsection 5.3.1, Plant Material Selection and Use, contains a description of these classifications, and generally describes the basic uses for each type of tree. For each species, Planning Standard Detail No. 10 contains detailed information about the character of the tree, including: • maximum height and spread; • spacing at installation; • water use; • intended use; and • tree type. Planning Standard Detail No. 10 identifies where and how trees should be used, and the appropriateness of each species for use in different Realm areas. For the Private Realm, any tree listed in the matrix may be utilized. Planning Standard Detail No. 10 follows a similar pattern by identifying the shrubs, vines and ground cover by street location and application. For each species, Planning Standard Detail No. 10 contains detailed information about the character of the shrubs, vines and ground cover, including: 5-16 5.0 Design Plan • maximum height and spread; • spacing at installation; and • water use. Planning Standard Detail No. 10 identifies where and how shrubs, vines and ground cover should be used, and the appropriateness of each species for use in different Realm areas. For the Private Realm, any shrubs, vines and ground cover listed in the matrix may be utilized. For Planning Standard Detail No. 10, a 'P' indicates that the particular plant has either the quality indicated (in the case of the portion of the matrix which describes the plant's character), or that the plant is preferred for the designation. A solid dot indicates that the plant is acceptable for the indicated use, and the absence of a dot generally means that the plant should not be used for the specified situation. Within the Private Realm, the matrix may be interpreted more freely; for example, it is acceptable for trees not identified as specimens to be used as specimens if planted in larger sizes (48" box, or larger). The intent is to permit more flexibility for landscape areas located in the Private Realm but visible from the public right-of-ways. Plants listed in Planning Standard Detail No. 10 should comprise at least 80% of the area to be landscaped and 80% of the total list of plants to be used within the Setback Realm and Public Realm. Plants listed in Planning Standard No. 10 should also comprise at least 80% of the area to be landscaped and 80% of the total list of plants to be used within the Private Realm, where visible from the public right-of-way. Ensuring similar and complementary tree, shrubs, vines and ground cover within both the Specific Plan and The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program, and Planning Standard Detail No. 10 will strengthen the overall appearance of The Anaheim Resort. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Planning Standard Detail No. 10 may be amended from time -to -time by the Planning and Building Director to update the matrices with more current and contemporary plant nursery offerings that are more drought, disease and/or pest -resistant plantings. For plantings within the Public Realm, Planning Standard Detail No. 10 identifies the preferred species and location. The Public Realm matrix may be amended from time -to -time by the Planning and Building Director and the Public Works Director. All plants and trees in the Public Realm shall be subject to the review and approval of the City. 5-17 5.0 Design Plan The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 5.0 Design Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 6.4 Landscape Cross Sections The Landscape Concept Diagram in Exhibit 5.4 (Landscape Cross Sections) shows the different landscape treatments proposed for each of the major public streets in the area. This Diagram is intended to illustrate the overall planting design concept and does not show the actual size or placement of trees and other landscape elements. The following landscape cross sections are intended to provide a general overview of the different landscape treatments that will help create the unifying identity for The Anaheim Resort. They also show the approximate location of the Public Realm, Setback Realm and Private Realm on each public street in the ARSP area. In this way they provide a key to Sections 5.6, Design Criteria for the Public Realm, 5.7, Design Criteria for the Setback Realm, and 5.8, Design Criteria for the Public Realm, which contain more detailed information about each Realm, including the role of each Realm creating an overall unifying identity and a description of the specific components of each respective Realm. The cross sections are not intended to illustrate every condition that may occur within or adjacent to the street right-of-way, nor do they contain setback and right-of-way dimensions. 5-18 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 5.41 Landscape Cross Sections 5.0 Design Plan � � 28 • V eF bO Wv' ° C6" of- C 1 Anaheim. I 1 Ball''RcJ` r _ 74 �,p�, , d gT7 1 1 ! = It m:.. Disneyland Theme Park 70 '-"Ma®ic Way' f 21 %, C•erriPos Ave t 0 4. � �� 22f :Cemtos-A4e I !r AnaWe- A - L� CA Adyenfwe 5 ThemePo'k !R 1 Kdtella Ave r7 L — a = '—= � Kdtdllci -Ave � --- �= 7a T + 2319 f - 9� m crryaau�aA.r --� L 24 Orangewood Ave }ar City of 29 1 _ T — _ � cCrfy Garden Grove Jl� � 9 ofRY I r Orange `" - Chapman Ave- t Landscape Gross Sections LEGEND MAP FEATURES fate./Source. The Anaheim Resort Boundaryg —'� The Anaheim Resort I— Specific Plan Boundary a Segments of the Designated d �nated Road Specific Plan92-1 County Parcel Data, 2021 City Boundary Data, *Refer to DRSP Sectionn 4 for additional 4f information an road abandonment areas. Boundary C J CityBound. Specific Plan 92-2 NOTE: The numbers shown in the map above conespond Specific Plan 93-1 to street cross sections specified within Section 4.4, Anaheim Resort Arterial/Secondary system (with the prefix 4.4-X). 0 750 L500 Feet MARCH 2O24 5-19 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Disneyland Drive Exhibit 5.4-1 Disneyland Drive (North of Ball Road) Landscape Cross Section Private j Setback Realm I Realm Setback landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, ground cover and/or turf, planting design to be layered landscape Pedestrian sidewalk eet trees in parkway to isist of closely spaced 6cal trees Public Realm 5-20 5.0 Design Plan Setback I Private Realm Realm The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 5.0 Design Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 5.4-2 Disneyland Drive (Between 825 feet n/o Katella Avenue and 1,350 feet n/o Katella Avenue) Landscape Cross Section Setback landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, and ground cover and/or turf_ Pedestrian sidewalk Street trees in parkways and median to consist of altemating vertical trees and medium or large canopy trees Planting on ground may include shrubs, ground cover and/or turf Private Setback Public Realm Realm I Realm Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 5-21 Setback Private Realm Realm Disneyland Resort Specific Plan The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 5.0 Design Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) West Street Exhibit 5.4-3 West Street (South of Katella Avenue) Landscape Cross Section Private Setback Realm I Realm Layered landscape in setback to consist of trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover and/or turf Pedestrian sidewalk Parkway planting to consist of medium or large canopy trees f Planting on ground may include ground cover and/or turf . Public Realm 5-22 Setback Private Realm Realm The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) West Place Exhibit 5.4-4 West Place Landscape Cross Section Parkway landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, ground cover and/or turf, planting design to be layered landscape Pedestrian Sidewalk Small or medium canopy tree as street tree Planting on ground may include ground cover and/or turf Private Setback I Public Realm Realm I Realm 5-23 a-clu Setback Realm 5.0 Design Plan 16 Private Realm The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 5.0 Design Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Disney Way Exhibit 5.4-5 Disney Way (East of Clementine Street) Landscape Cross Section Private Setback Realm Realm Multi -use, Class I bicycle facility Pedestrian Sidewalk---n edium or large canopy trees to be pl; in landscaped parkway Medium or large canopy trees to be planted in median I 5-24 ck Private n Realm The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 5.0 Design Plan Exhibit 5.4-6 Ultimate Katella Avenue (Between Interstate 5 and West Street/Disneyland Drive) Landscape Cross Section Private I Setback Realm Realm Layered landscape in setback consists of trees, shrubs, ground cover and turf. Double row of Date Palms twenty-four feet (24) on center Ground cover Special light fixtures mayinclude turf, with banners in ground cover, or ti parkwayand median rshrubs Public Realm 5-25 Setback I Private Realm Realm The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 5.0 Design Plan Exhibit 5.4-7 Ultimate Katella Avenue (Between Walnut Street and West Street/Disneyland Drive) Landscape Cross Section Layered landscape in setback consists of trees, shrubs, ground cover and turf. Double row of Date Palms twenty-four feet (24) on center Special fight fixtures with banners in parkway and Private Setback Realm I Realm Ground cover may include turf, ground cover, or shrubs Public Realm 5-26 Setback Private Realm I Realm The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Walnut Street Exhibit 5.4-8 Walnut Street Landscape Cross Section Setback landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, ground cover and/or turf; planting design to be layered landscape. Trees in parkway and median to be regularly spaced medium canopy trees Landscape on ground may consist of shrubs; ground cover and/or turf and may be bermed Public Realm Multi -use, Class I bicycle facility 5-27 Setback Private Realm I Realm 5.0 Design Plan The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Harbor Boulevard 5.0 Design Plan Exhibit 5.4-9 Harbor Boulevard (Between Chapman Avenue and Orangewood Avenue) Landscape Cross Section * F Alternatin vertical tree and -= Private I Setback Realm Realm Setback landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, vines and ground cover Pedestrian Sidewalk medium or large canopy tree to � q' be planted in tree wells 4. h Public Realm 5-28 Setback I Private Realm Realm The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 5.0 Design Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 5.4-10 Harbor Boulevard (Orangewood to Manchester on the East Side and Orangewood to 150-250 Feet South of Manchester Avenue on the West Side) Landscape Cross Section Layered landscape consisting of trees, shrubs and/or ground cover Vertical trees with vines planted at base, thirty-two feet (32') on center, Medium or large canopy trees in parkway and median, thirty-two feet (37) on center, typical Planting on Special tight fixtures ground to consist with banners in of barrier shrubs, parkway and rnedian, gwnind cover I I � 4 typical and/or tuq Private I Setback Public Realm I Setback I Private Realm Realm Realm Realm 5-29 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 5.0 Design Plan Exhibit 5.4-11 Harbor Boulevard (Between Manchester Avenue on the East Side and 150- 250 feet South of Manchester Avenue on the West Side to the Interstate 5 Interchange) Landscape Cross Section Medium or large canopy trees in median and parkway (as space permits), thirty- two feet (32) on center, typical Fence to be Planting on ground Special tight fbdwes planted with to consist of with banners in vines shrubs, ground parkway and median, cover and/or fief N e Nf typical Public Realm 5-30 Fence to be planted with vines Note: Planting of vines and parkway flee as shown subject to approval of Caltrans and the City Engineer_ Setback I Pmiate Realm Realm The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 5.0 Design Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 5.4-12 Harbor Boulevard (Interstate 5 to Vermont Avenue) Landscape Cross Section Private I Setback Realm Realm Setback landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, urines and ground cover Pedestrian Sidewalk medium•' canopy tree to be planted Public Realm 5-31 Setback I Private Realm Realm The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24 Ball Road Exhibit 5.4-13 Ball Road (West of West Place) Landscape Cross Section Setback landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, vines and ground cover Medium or large canopy trees to be planted in landscaped parkway Class II bicycle facility Medium or large canopytrees to be planted in existing landscaped median Public Realm Setback Private Realm I Realm 5-32 5.0 Design Plan The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 5.0 Design Plan Exhibit 5.4-14 Ball Road (Between West Place and Cast Place) Landscape Cross Section Private Realm Setback landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, vines and ground cover Medium or large canopy trees to be planted in landscaped parkways Painted median Public Realm 5-33 Setbac k I Private Realm Realm The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 5.0 Design Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 5.4-15 Ball Road (East of Cast Place) Landscape Cross Section Setback landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, vines and ground cover Medium or large canopy trees to be planted in landscaped parkway Medium or large canopy trees to be planted in median, east of Harbor Boulevard Private I Setbackl Public Realm I Setback I Private Realm Realm Realm Realm 5-34 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 5.0 Design Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Clementine Street Exhibit 4.4-16 Clementine Street Landscape Cross Section Parkway planting to consist of alternating vertical trees and small or medium canopy trees Planting on ground may include ground cover and/or turf Median planting to consist of small canopy trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover and/or turf Public Realm Setback Private Realm I Realm 5-35 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Haster Street/Anaheim Boulevard Exhibit 5.4-17 Haster Street/Anaheim Boulevard Landscape Cross Section $Otb*Cx kznd=ope to canes as trees. shnam, vMw. ^Dew covo onrdfor hart Parkway and median landscape to consist of altennatire tall vertical trees and small or medium carkopy trees ftriMg on ground moycov, of kK rhrld/or g nd COVW Class II bicycle facility JS 1-3 6-M-1 5.0 Design Plan The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 5.0 Design Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Convention Way Exhibit 5.4-18 Convention Way Landscape Cross Section Private I Setback Realm Realm Setback landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, ground cover and/or turf, planting design to be layered landscape Vertical Dalm where Public Realm 5-37 Setback I Private Realm Realm The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 5.0 Design Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 5.4-19 Gene Autry Way Landscape Cross Section Setback landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, ground cover and/or turf Pedestrian Sidewalk Alternating Palm/Canopy Trees in the Parkways and medians Supplementary median planting of large, upright, broad -leaf evergreen J shrubs Public Realm 5-38 Setback I Private Realm Realm The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 5.0 Design Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Manchester Avenue Exhibit 5.4-20 West Manchester Avenue Landscape Cross Section Setback landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, ground cover and/or turf, planting design to be layered landscape_ Pedestrian Sidewalk Street trees in parkways and median to consist of alternating vertical trees and small or medium canopy trees W Private I Setback I Public Realm I Setback Private Realm Realm 11 Realm Realm 5-39 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 5.0 Design Plan Exhibit 5.4-21 North Manchester Avenue (Adjacent to Interstate 5, North of the Parking Overlay) Landscape Cross Section Private I Setback Realm I Realm Setback landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, ground cover and/or turf; planting design to be layered landscape Pedestrian Sidewalk Street trees in parkways to consist of , alternating vertical trees and small or medium canopy trees Public Realm 5-40 Interstate 5 Right -of -Way The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 5.0 Design Plan Exhibit 5.4-22 North Manchester Avenue (Adjacent to Interstate 5 and the Parking Overlay, North of Alro Way) Landscape Cross Section Private Setback Realm I Realm Setback landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, ground cover and/or turf; planting design to be layered landscape Multi -use, Class bicycle facility Alternating vertical trees or small or AL A medium canopy trees in landscaped median Street trees in parkways to consist of alternating vertical trees and small or medium canopy trees Public Realm 5-41 Interstate 5 Right -of -Way The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 5.0 Design Plan Exhibit 5.4-23 Manchester Avenue, East of Anaheim Boulevard (Adjacent to Interstate 5) Landscape Cross Section Setback landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, ground comer and/or turf; planting design to be layered landscape Pedestrian Sidewalk Street trees in parkways to consist of alternating vertical trees and small or medium canopy Private I Setback Realm I Realm Public Realm 5-42 Interstate 5 Right -Of -Way The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 5.0 Design Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Orangewood Avenue Exhibit 5.4-24 Orangewood Avenue Landscape Cross Section Pedestrian Sidewalk Parkway planting to consist of medium or large canopy trees Planting on ground may include ground At. cover and/or turf Y Private Setback Public Realm Realm Realm 5-43 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Chapman Avenue Exhibit 5.4-25 Chapman Avenue Landscape Cross Section Setback landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, vines and ground cover Medium or large canopy trees to be painted in landscaped parkway Medium or large canopy trees to be planted in existing landscaped median Public Realm 5-44 5.0 Design Plan Setbackl Private Realm I Realm The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Local Streets Exhibit 5.4-26 Alro Way Landscape Cross Section Setback landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, ground cover and/or turf; planting design to be layered landscape Pedestrian Sidewalk Small or medium canopy tree as street r trees Planting on ground may include ground cover and/or turf Private Setback Public Realm Realm Realm 5-45 5.0 Design Plan The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 5.4-27 Casa Vista Street Landscape Cross Section Setback landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, ground cover and/or turf, planting design to be layered landscape "--'est"an Sidewalk mall or medium anopy tree as street Des Planting on ground may include ground cover and/or turf E ---- Prorate Setback Public Realm Realm Realm 5-46 5.0 Design Plan The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 5.4-28 Vermont Avenue Landscape Cross Section Setback landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, ground cover and/or turf, planting design to be layered landscape 4% f 1 Pedestrian Sidewalk Small or medium canopy tree as street trees Public Realm I Setback I Private Realm Realm 5-47 5.0 Design Plan The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH Exhibit 5.4-29 Wilken Way Landscape Cross Section Setback landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, ground cover and/or turf; planting design to be layered landscape Pedestrian Sidewalk Small or medium canopy tree as street trees ¢ r ' Planting on ground may include ground cover and/or turf Private Setback Public Realm Realm Realm 5-48 5.0 Design Plan The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 5.4-30 Zeyn Street Landscape Cross Section Setback landscape to consist of trees, shrubs, ground cover and/or turf; planting design to be layered landscape Pedestrian Sidewalk Small or medium canopy tree as street trees 4 r Planting on ground may include ground carver and/or turf Private Setback Public Realm Realm Realm 5-49 5.0 Design Plan The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 5.5 Identity Concept Plan The Anaheim Resort Identity Program describes how signs and other identity elements, such as entry gateways and street furniture in the Public Realm, and freestanding monument signs identifying private businesses in the Setback Realm, will help create the unified environment envisioned for the entire Anaheim Resort. The Anaheim Resort Identity Program was approved by the City Council as a separate document. All Public Realm Identity elements, as well as the Freestanding Monument Sign Design, described in the Anaheim Resort Identity Program are ap- plicable to the entire Anaheim Resort. This sign program for the ARSP will have the following characteristics: • Prior to installation, plans will be prepared which show the location, sign type, and message (or messages, in the case of a changeable message sign) that will be used for each sign in the ARSP area; • Signs in the Public Realm (the ultimate public right-of-way) and the freestanding monument signs in the Setback Realm have been designed as a family of signs with a con- sistent design vocabulary; and, • Consistent regulations for signs on private property will make it easier for visitors to quickly find their destination. Additional important information about signs is also contained elsewhere in the ARSP in Section 5.6, Design Criteria for the Public Realm; Section 5.7, Design Criteria for the Setback Realm; and Section 1.1, Design Criteria for the Private Realm. Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards, contains the Anaheim Municipal Code regulations which apply to signs in the ARSP area. 5-50 5.0 Design Plan The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 5.6 Design Criteria for the Public Realm Exhibit 5.6-1 The Three Elements of the Design Hierarchy. The Public Realm, The Setback Realm, and the Private Realm Public Setback Private I Reafm Realm Realm Bulding Envelope ultimate Public Building Buildable Right-of-way I setback I Portion 1 As described in Section 5.2.7, Establish a Clear Design Hierarchy, the Design Plan divides the ARSP area into three segments: the Public Realm, the Setback Realm, and the Private Realm. The most visible segment, known as the Public Realm, includes all the area within the ultimate public right-of-way within the specific plan area and includes public streets, street medians, parkways and sidewalks. Because of its visual prominence and because development of this segment will primarily be implemented by the City or other government agencies (i.e., Caltrans), more specific design solutions are prescribed for the Public Realm than for the other Realms. These design solutions are described in The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape and Identity Programs, with supplemental information provided in this section. 5-51 5.0 Design Plan The primary design emphasis in the Public Realm is to provide a streetscape design that implements the major design concepts described in the preceding sections. Adherence to the streetscape design concepts for the Public Realm is extremely important because of the dominant role a street's image has in creating The Anaheim Resort's identity. Creating a strong identity is critically dependent on implementing a consistent, high quality, streetscape treatment. Virtually all who pass through the area will be affected by the quality of the street environment. The Public Realm includes public streets wholly within the ARSP area or public streets on the border of the Specific Plan area. The ARSP describes all public streets contained wholly or partially within the ARSP area. The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan also identifies the ultimate right-of-way within its boundaries as the Public Realm. The design concepts of streets within the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and the ARSP have been designed to be compatible so that The Anaheim Resort, as a whole will have a consistent design and identity. The public streets that are entirely outside the ARSP area are not described in this document. Interstate 5, which is located outside The Anaheim Resort, has been included within the Public Realm because of its importance to the arriving visitor's experience. Exhibit 5.6-2 (The Public Realm), shows the extent of the Public Realm throughout The Anaheim Resort. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 5.6-2 1 The Public Realm Vermont Nye Q '_ i� CIfy�Of s f`' Anaheim, Ball' Rd' FialI;R'd' a 3` ,Q Ulsney qg4, 'Tileme°,Pork, :fvlLrgiE";Nlay J 5.0 Design Plan Cerritos Ave CerritorsAge. D o w A. �j}I a-6,.Jex-V/.ay Cltj/„of, r CALAbentuie' I; .QnafiCln7 L 1 Th'eme,Park i �` r _Ort Katella Ave � �r � t _ — _ � _ JICatella it � Ia -� I , •. cece� ° _ .,ane�Au'r,. W. . I v1 9� 0 17- :cny BOUNDARY_ I� OrangewoodAve- it C'y__ of r COYBOUNDARy'___f Garden Grove I G y of --� r�! F.—vecIF" I Oi••= 4 abonment of Disneyland DrNe and Magicoadjacent Pudic Realm omw wig be. Chapman",Ave — — — — The Public Realm LEGEND �-j The Anaheim Resort Boundary The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Boundary C J City Boundary MAP FEATURES _ The Public Realm 5-52 NM -/Sources City Legal Lot Data, 2022 City Boundary Data, 2022 D 750 1.`.�DD O �reet MARCH 2O24 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 5.6.1 Gateways Since many visitors will arrive in the area by vehicle, the Specific Plan defines three different types of gateways that will be oriented primarily to vehicles: Freeway Gateways, Arterial Gateways and Vehicular Arrival Gateways. The Specific Plan also contains a Pedestrian Arrival Gateway that will be oriented primarily to pedestrians. The design of the gateways reinforces the overall identity of The Anaheim Resort according to the Identity Concept Plan described in Section 5.5. The locations of the Freeway Gateways, Arterial Road Gateways, Vehicular Arrival Gateway, and Pedestrian Arrival Gateway are shown on Exhibit 5.6-3 (Gateway Location Plan). The following is a general description and guiding principles for each of these major gateways. 6.6.1.1 Freeway Gateways: The Plan identities three freeway gateways along Interstate 5 as shown on Exhibit 5.6-3 (Gateway Location Plan). They will be the first experience of The Anaheim Resort for nearly 70% of arriving visitors and will be oriented primarily to vehicles. Because most of the visitors to The Anaheim Resort will be arriving via Interstate 5, it has an important role in creating and enhancing the overall Anaheim Resort identity. The design of the Interstate 5 interchanges with Disneyland Drive, Harbor Boulevard/Ball Road, and Katella Avenue/Disney Way will reinforce and complement the overall design objectives of the Plan. Secondary carpool access to The Anaheim Resort and Platinum Triangle is provided at Gene Autry Way; however this interchange does not include the same design considerations as the other major interchanges. Each interchange is treated as a large-scale gar- den easily perceived from vehicles traveling at 5-53 5.0 Design Plan freeway speeds. To differentiate the interchanges from one another, each features a distinct landscape type found in Southern California. The Disneyland Drive interchange is a temperate garden, featuring vertical evergreen trees; the Harbor Boulevard/Ball Road interchange, a temperate/subtropical garden, featuring large flowering canopy & vertical trees consistent with the Public Realm landscape on Harbor Boulevard; and the Katella Avenue/ Disney Way interchange, an and garden, featuring succulent and other plants characteristic of the Southern California deserts. Plants are selected for their drought tolerance to the extent feasible, as well as their ability to create a visual impact and identity. The three primary Freeway arrival gateways are located at the Interstate 5 Katella Avenue/Disney Way, Harbor Boulevard/Ball Road, and Disneyland Drive interchanges, since the majority of vehicles to The Anaheim Resort will use these interchanges. The design concept for these gateways extends the landscape treatment of the adjacent Freeway interchange in The Anaheim Resort until a smooth transition can be made to the public streets. The character of the freeway gateways will be created primarily by landscaping, which may consist of large-scale plantings of trees and directional signs. Other features incorporated into these gateways include: • Night lighting which highlights the arrival experience; • Architectural elements consistent with the other garden -like elements to be used in the area; and, • Identification signs to supplement the directional signs. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 5.6-3 1 Gateway Location Plan Ve�o�s Pve 96CI Rd I City;afw Aria_ him Ball' Rd' A ti c .� a Dlsneyldn'rl i ?Tifemg.Rark, I' AAp�FVJOM _. L �• w . ,Cerritos Ave �' ', Cerritos -Ave. I m o. m. ° o r City of Anaheim ») j I Theme; Park � r _ Canrenlfon ` a _� ' f yY , I 6 !B ' N 9. P CrrY 60UNDARY_ I, _ r . = — — —' :Orangewood A've 5.0 Design Plan City of Garden. Grove NOTES: I. Freewoy, Adedal, and ArrivalGateways all camPlefed prior }o Disneylandr-onward. With the exception of the Amval Gateways at fM1e Southeast Disfnct and Disney Way, all other Gatewayys wmplefed Ppnnor fo DisneylandForward. Completed gateway desrgns moy be modir�d as part of ruNre development, in accordance with relevant DRSP and ARSP design guidance. Gateway Location Plan LEGEND The Anaheim Resort Boundary The Anaheim Resort i_ Specific Plan Boundary J City Boundary CFWDOUNDARY! _ I City o`f I r Orange -Chap man A've — — — MAP FEATURES Freeway Gateways Pedestrian Arrival Gateways . Arterial Road Gateways _ Vehicular Arrival Gateways IDimeyland Drive North, Disneyland Drive South, Southeast District North, Southeast District East, and Disney Way/Clementine Street] 5-54 Notes/Sourc.s City legal Lot Dota. 2022 aty Bwnd.,y Dot., 2022 •The Anaheim Rewl Identify Program �-, 0 MARCH 2O24 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 6.6.1.2 Arterial Gateways: Arterial gateways occur on Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue near the edges of the Central Core area. They are oriented primarily to vehicles and include the following primary elements: • Trellis -like architectural elements located in the median and/or parkways, depending on local conditions; • Trellis elements with the same appearance at each location, though their arrangement may vary; • Trellis elements placed on a base which reinforces the element's traditional character; • Landscape on the ground features color and large, uniform shrub masses, seasonal color, or other similar landscape plantings; • The gateways allow for the attachment of flags and banners; the deployment of these elements is related to seasonal or event - driven needs; • The Anaheim Resort logo is included in the gateway; and, • Night lighting highlights the gateway after sunset. There are four arterial road gateways, which are described below. Additional information regarding the arterial road gateways is provided in The Anaheim Resort Identity Program. 5.6.1.2.1 Harbor Boulevard North The Harbor Boulevard North gateway is located at the northern entry into the Central Core area. It is located immediately south of the intersection of Harbor Boulevard and Manchester Avenue. Because of the constrictions in the parkways on the east side of Harbor Boulevard, the garden trellis architectural elements are limited solely to the medians. 5-55 5.0 Design Plan Exhibit 5.6-4 Harbor Boulevard North Gateway 5.6.1.2.2 Harbor Boulevard South The Harbor Boulevard South gateway is located at the southern entry into the Central Core area. It is located immediately north of the intersection of Harbor Boulevard and Orangewood Avenue. To match the Harbor Boulevard North gateway, the garden trellis architectural elements are limited solely to the medians. 5.6.1.2.3 Katella Avenue East The Katella Avenue East gateway is located west of the intersection of Katella Avenue and Anaheim Bou levard/H aster Street. The gateway elements, including the garden -trellis architectural elements are placed in both the median and 8-foot parkway on either side of the street. No elements span the street. The gateway area begins several hundred feet west from the intersection with Haster Street west of the left - turn lane median. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 5.6.1.2.4 Katella Avenue West The Katella Avenue West gateway is located east of the intersection of Katella Avenue and Walnut Street. The gateway elements, including the garden -trellis architectural elements, are placed in both the median and 8-foot parkway on either side of the street. No elements span the street. The gateway area begins immediately east of the intersection unless there is a left -turn lane for westbound traffic, in which case the gateway area will begin immediately east of the left -turn lane median. Exhibit 5.6-5 Katella Avenue West Gateway 6.6.1.3 Vehicular Arrival Gateways There are two Vehicular Arrival Gateways located within the Specific Plan area. These vehicular arrival gateways include Harbor Boulevard at the Theme Park East Overlay entrance and Manchester Avenue along the Parking Overlay. These Vehicular Arrival Gateway will be primarily oriented to vehicles but will also accommodate pedestrians. To be compatible with the Arterial Gateways in The Anaheim Resort Identity Program, the Vehicular Arrival Gateway may include elements located in the parkways, subject to the approval of the Planning and Building Director and Public Works Director. Special landscape planting will enhance these gateway areas and may provide for pageantry, such as flags and banners. Special architectural 1_1 5.0 Design Plan features may span from one side of the street to the other, or from parkways to medians. Night lighting will be used during the evening to enhance the gateway's effect. Sign copy identifying The Disneyland Resort may also be included within the Vehicular Arrival Gateways and are regulated by Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards. Any elements constructed in the public right-of-way prior will be required to obtain an encroachment agreement from the City. A more detailed plan depicting the arrival areas in the public right-of-way shall be submitted for review and Public Works Director for conformance with The Anaheim Resort Identity Program. 5.6.1.3.1 Theme Park East Overlay Vehicular Arrival Gateway As part of DisneylandForward, a new Vehicular Arrival Gateway is proposed along Harbor Boulevard at the Theme Park East Overlay within the Specific Plan area. The Theme Park East Overlay Vehicular Arrival Gateway will be located on the east side of Harbor Boulevard at the intersection of Convention Way. This Vehicular Arrival Gateway will be primarily oriented to vehicles and include special landscape planting, surrounding garden elements, and along with pageantry and night lighting to enhance the gateway's effect. 5.6.1.3.2 Parking Overlay Vehicular Arrival Gateway As part of DisneylandForward, a new Vehicular Arrival Gateway is proposed along Disney Way between Clementine Street and Harbor Boulevard and Manchester Avenue/Clementine Street from Disney Way to the north boundary of the Parking Overlay. Since the final configuration of the DRSP East Parking Area has not yet been determined, the precise configuration and character of this gateway has not yet been established. However, the gateway elements may include: • The drop-off area adjacent to Harbor Boulevard, which may be moved to the The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Parking Overlay or DRSP East Parking Area in conjunction with the construction of a parking facility and at least one and up to three pedestrian bridges over Harbor Boulevard; Landscape, architectural, and sign elements that visitors entering the theme parks will use and see; Pedestrian walkways and/or transportation system(s) which will move people to the entry plaza; and, A Harbor Boulevard pedestrian crosswalk in combination with at least one and up to three pedestrian bridges over Harbor Boulevard. 5.6.1.4 Pedestrian Arrival Gateway Pedestrian Arrival Gateways occur between public parking facilities and theme park entry plazas, such as the existing Pedestrian Arrival Gateway on Harbor Boulevard in the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. They will be primarily oriented to pedestrians and the gateway area may include the entire experience from the parking facility to the theme park entry. The character of these gateways is related to the theme park experience and may consist of architectural, lighting, and landscape elements which are organized to heighten the pedestrian's anticipation of entering the theme park. Informational and directional signs, flags and displays may be part of the gateway, as well as marquee signs intended to identify the theme parks to pedestrians and vehicles. Sign copy identifying The Disneyland Resort may also be included within the Pedestrian Arrival Gateway and are regulated by Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards. A more detailed plan depicting the arrival areas in the public right-of- way shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning and Building Director, and Public Works Director for conformance with The Anaheim Resort Identity Program. 5-57 5.0 Design Plan 5.6.1.4.1 Theme Park East Overlay Pedestrian Arrival Gateway As part of Disneyland Forward, a new Pedestrian Arrival Gateway is proposed along Harbor Boulevard at the Theme Park East Overlay. The Theme Park East Overlay Pedestrian Arrival Gateway will be located on the east side of Harbor Boulevard at the intersection of Convention Way. It will include special landscape planting, surrounding garden elements, and pageantry and night lighting to enhance the gateway's effect. 5.6.2 Public Streets Public streets are the backbone of the Public Realm. The design concepts for the public streets are described in The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 5.7 Design Criteria for the Setback Realm The Setback Realm includes the required structural setback area between the Public and Private Realms. The primary role of the Setback Realm is to support the design objectives for ARSP area by reinforcing the design of the streets. The setback areas vary significantly in width, use and character. Consequently, the design guidelines for the Setback Realm vary depending on these factors. Visual consistency will be achieved by application of the common landscape vocabulary, such as the layered landscape concept described in preceding sections, and the regularity of the landscape treatment along the adjacent public streets. The widths of the setback areas are identified in Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards. Exhibit 5.7-1 The Three Elements of the Design Hierarchy: The Public Realm, The Setback Realm, and the Private Realm Public Setback Private Realm I Realm Realm Buiding Envelope Ultimate Public Building Buildable Right -of -Way I Setback I Portion 5-58 5.0 Design Plan 5.7.1 Exterior Lighting The following guidelines apply to exterior lighting in the Setback Realm or where visible from the public right-of-way. • Special accent lighting may illuminate unique architectural details where appropriate, but such lighting should be focused and used sparingly. • Multi -colored lights may only be used sparingly. • Landscape lighting, including tree uplights, small bare -bulb incandescent lights, "twinkle" lights, and other similar lighting effects are encouraged to add a glittering or specular effect to supplement the indirect nature of the rest of the Specific Plan area's night lighting. Requirements for exterior lighting are found in Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards. 5.7.2 Freestanding Monument Sign Guidelines The major sign element in the Setback Realm is the freestanding monument sign for identification of private businesses. Since these signs are designed to reinforce the identity of The Anaheim Resort, a similar trellis vocabulary is used. The plan provides for freestanding monument signs to be located within the Setback Realm. These signs are intended to identify particular uses or properties. The Anaheim Resort Identity Program (Appendix C) and Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards, contains design criteria, which regulate the location, size, appearance and message of these signs. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 5.7-2 Freestanding Monument Sign Hotel/motel owners may place standardized affiliation information on the Freestanding Monument Sign as shown in Exhibit 5.7-3 (Freestanding Sign Design Criteria). Exhibit 5.7-3 Freestanding Sign Design Criteria ww" m seba& sgeaNdto MeftAve between Hader Shut WW W*4d Sheet end He�hor Badowd WWwn hde�slste 5 end omnwwxw AYeme_ 0 feet else iw% 7 feet mhnmm. Freestanding monument signs are located in the Setback Realm to provide a primary source of business identification for all categories of commercial enterprise. They are part of the identity elements for The Anaheim Resort and as such contribute to the unifying effect of the overall identity sign and streetscape program. 5-59 5.0 Design Plan 5.7.3 Central Core The principal objective within the Setback Realm in the Central Core is to create a consistent, high quality pedestrian environment that reinforces the character established by the landscape and other street elements contained in the Public Realm. Generally, these objectives are achieved by: • Building massing that defines the street edge in a consistent manner; • Limiting the extent of the area devoted to the automobile; • Special intersection landscape treatment for intersections in the Central Core as well as other major entrances in The Anaheim Resort; • Planting design which is compatible with the treatment of the adjacent Public Realm • Limiting the variety of outdoor lighting effects; and, • Consistent size, placement and treatment of signs. Requirements for the Central Core are contained in Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards. Exhibit 5.7-4 (Basic Central Core Design Principles) is a diagram, which illustrates the basic Central Core design principles. The following guidelines provide property owners with additional recommendations for this area. Exhibit 5.7-4 Basic Central Core Design Principles Ground floor use to attract pedestrians f� No parking between building and right-of-way Consistent sign design k Consistent paint pallette and landscpae design treatment ■ i Public I Setback ;Private Realm Realm ;Realm The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 6.7.3.1 Central Core Architectural Guidelines Property owners are encouraged to articulate building masses adjacent to the right-of-way with elements such as: • Recesses in windows and door openings. • Variations in building height. • Balconies and awnings. • Buildings with distinct layers —a base, a middle and a top. 6.7.3.2 Central Core Circulation and Parking Guidelines The following circulation and parking guidelines are intended to enhance the pedestrian experience: • Eliminate curb cuts and driveways that disrupt the flow of pedestrians whenever feasible; eliminate redundant access driveways to the same parcel or consolidate driveways on adjacent parcels. • The maximum width of a driveway should not exceed twenty-eight (28) feet. • Entry to hotel parking areas (including those located under buildings) and surface parking lots may be directly from the adjacent Central Core street provided such entry is not more than 28 feet wide and is less than 20% of the width of the property. • The maximum number of curb cuts per lot should adhere to the following: Parcel Width Number of Curb Cuts 300 feet or less 1 >300 feet 2 5-60 5.0 Design Plan Exhibit 5.7-5 Redundant Curb Cuts Parcel A Parcel A ! Parcel B Parcel B access ' access driveway ' driveway J , _+I a! 2i a; i Sidewalk ----------- -i - -••-••-••-• ................... ' T Central Redundant curb Core Street cuts disrupt pedestrian traffic Exhibit 5.7-6 Consolidate Curb Cuts Parcel A ! Parcel A ! Parcel B Parcel B access (Di access driveway -i ! driveway �i ai 2 d! Reciprocal access easements may be necessary to assure permanent access ht_of_way Sidewalk Central Core Street Consolidated driveways smooth pedestrain flow Exhibit 5.7-7 Limit Portion of Elevation Devoted to Parking Area Entries Entry to parking areas covers no more than 28 feet I ! ! i Parcel Width The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 6.7.3.3 Central Core Landscape Guidelines The landscape character of the Setback Realm in the Central Core should support the "garden district" image of The Anaheim Resort, the landscape of the adjacent Public Realm and the underlying layered -landscape concept described earlier in Subsection 5.3.2, Layered Landscape Design Criteria. Where there is adequate space and the scale is appropriately grand, trees should be planted in a way that creates large-scale horizontal and vertical layers. Special intersection landscape treatment, as depicted in Exhibit 5.7-8 (Special Intersection Landscape Treatment), is required and further described in Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards, for the following intersections, which are either entry points to The Anaheim Resort or major intersections within this area. All of these intersections are within the Central Core except for the Ball Road intersections: • Harbor Boulevard and Manchester Avenue; • Harbor Boulevard and Orangewood Avenue; • Katella Avenue and Anaheim Boulevard/ Haster Street; • Katella Avenue and West Street; • Ball Road and West Street/Disneyland Drive; and, • Ball Road and West Place. The criteria for the Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue Intersection Area are located in Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards and Section 1.5 of The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program and are generally depicted in Exhibit 5.7-9 (Harbor Boulevard/Katella Avenue Intersection Area). 5-61 5.0 Design Plan Exhibit 5.7-8 Special Intersection Landscape Treatment Low shrubs colorfulplar Intermix of street trees Public Right-0fway Exhibit 5.7-9 Harbor Boulevard/Katella Avenue Intersection Area IIPECNLPAVWG: All PAYING WRNW THE PUBLIC RE" SKALL6E SPECIAL PAVWOMATTRIAL PER CRY STANDARDS LE.TMVLTE RIDER OFWAY— CURB— SIDEWALK— DATE PALM TREE PALM TREE IN — TREE ORATE SPECIAL PAVING START POINfATMIERSECIWN OF EKMMN OF CURS LINES KING PALMIREES IN TREE MATES I• AD1%C'ENTTO Bus UMP / — Bu88TOP- IJ WHERE OCCURS L DAIS PALM TREE SCULPTURALIWBA DESIGN ELEMENTS NOTE; FINAL LANDSCAPE DESIGN SMECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL FROM PLANNING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 5.7.4 Areas Outside of the Central Core In the areas of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan outside of the Central Core, the intent of the Design Plan is to permit flexibility in site planning, architectural design, location of parking areas, and landscape design. The design standards for this area are contained in Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 5.8 Design Criteria for the Private Realm Exhibit 5.8-9 The Three Elements of the Design Hierarchy. The Public Realm, The Setback Realm, and the Private Realm Public Setback Private Realm Realm I Realm guiding (Ultimate Public Right -I Building I Buildable j of -Way j Setback ; Portion The Private Realm includes the privately - owned property not included in the Setback Realm described in the previous section. It encompasses all of the developable area of a parcel. Although the Private Realm is less visually prominent than the Public Realm and the Setback Realm, the design guidelines contained in this section and the design standards contained in Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards, are intended to help strengthen the over quality and character of development in the Specific Plan area. The design guidelines and standards serve two main purposes: • To ensure high quality development projects will occur over time by providing uniform design criteria; and, • To help minimize development costs by reducing ambiguity about what type of criteria will be applied by the City when evaluating specific development proposals. 5.0 Design Plan 5.8.1 Organization of Private Realm Design Standards and Guidelines The design guidelines and design standards provide both the general design principles and the specific regulations that will guide the design of private development projects within the Specific Plan area. In this Section, "guidelines" are considered to be generalized rules to be applied by designers with discretion and judgment to the particular condition which they address. They are intended to help guide designers to solutions that will enhance the quality of development projects within the Specific Plan area. They are not intended to provide the only design solution to every condition a designer might face, and should not discourage creative and innovative solutions. In situations where they apply, however, they should be followed. The term "standards" refers to regulations found in Section 7.0 of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) and in Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. City staff and decision makers will use both the guidelines and standards to evaluate projects for conformance with the intent of the Design Plan and the specific requirements of the Anaheim Municipal Code. 5.8.2 General Site Planning Guidelines Site planning is the process of arranging buildings, landscaped areas, circulation, parking, and service areas on a particular site. The following are recommended in 5-62 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) addition to the requirements in Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards: • Long, unarticulated building facades should not be placed adjacent to portions of the Setback Realm adjacent to public rights -of -way. • Provide landscape buffers between different land uses. • Orient at least one public entry toward major streets. • Provide direct pedestrian access from public walkways to buildings, where appropriate. • Provide secondary entries to buildings from parking areas or interior pedestrian walks. • Design buildings to allow pedestrians to circulate around buildings without stepping into vehicular driveways. • Provide pedestrian circulation between adjacent commercial properties where appropriate. • Provide reciprocal easements between adjacent properties for shared driveways and parking aisle connections. Exhibit 5.8-2 Landscape Buffer between Uses 4 5.8.3 Service, Storage and Maintenance Areas and Loading Docks Guidelines Although service, storage and maintenance areas and loading docks are important to the smooth function of uses within the 5-63 5.0 Design Plan Specific Plan area, they are not aesthetically compatible with the planned resort and entertainment areas. These areas should be incorporated into the main building whenever possible. It is important that the requirements in Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards be followed so that these areas do not detract from the visual quality of the Specific Plan area. Exhibit 5.8-3 (Screen Service Areas from View) demonstrates how these areas should be screened. Exhibit 5.8-3 Screen Service Areas from View 5.8.4 Exterior Lighting Guidelines Nighttime illumination of buildings is important in creating an interesting and safe environment. In addition, it can highlight building design features, add emphasis to prominent entrances and plazas, and create The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) an ambiance of vitality and security. In addition to the requirements of Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards, the following guidelines suggest ways in which these purposes can best be served. • Relate exterior lighting to the design elements of the site and building they serve. Lighting should highlight archi- tectural elements and details and not entire walls. • Design exterior lighting to be an integral part of the overall architectural concept. Fixtures, standards and all exposed accessories should be harmonious with the building design and the visual environment. Obtrusive lighting elements that detract from the appearance of their setting should be avoided. • Illuminate the entrances of buildings and parking areas to promote convenient, safe and easy identification. • Exterior lighting within private development should complement and not conflict with public lighting. • Consider energy conservation in nighttime lighting plans. Plans for the design and operation of lighting and illumination should be developed consistent with the latest technical and operational energy conservation con- cepts. • Include exterior lighting of pedestrian walkways within private development. Pedestrian walkway lighting levels should be set relative to the level of security necessary The guidelines shown in Table 5.8-1 (Allowable Lighting Levels by Level of Security), are averages. Higher lighting levels may be necessary to provide for safety, subject to the approval of the City. 5-64 5.0 Design Plan Table 5.8-1 Allowable Lighting Levels by Level of Security Average conditions 0.5 footcandle Security conditions, 2.0 footcandle 9-15 foot tall fixtures Security conditions, 4.0 footcandle 15-30 foot tall fixtures 5.8.5 Surface Parking Area Guidelines Parking lot design is a critical factor in the success or failure of a commercial use. In considering the possibilities for development of a parking area, the following factors will be analyzed: ingress and egress; avoidance of pedestrian and vehicular conflicts; conflicts with street traffic; and the overall configuration and appearance of the parking area. The following guidelines are in addition to the requirements of Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards: • If future expansion is contemplated, areas should be reserved for parking expansion and indicated as such on plan submittals. • Shared parking should be accommodated between adjacent parcels when appropriate. • Avoid heavily -textured paving that may create a difficult walking surface. • Provide pavement strength of all parking areas consistent with the expected traffic. • Discourage surface parking (excluding short-term parking associated with hotel drop-off areas) between the street setback and a building/structure within one hundred feet of a street intersection, as measured from the ultimate right-of- way line. (Surface parking is prohibited The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) in the Central Core between the front setback and the building/structure.) • Locate parking areas to the rear or, if no space is available, to the side of buildings, whenever possible. • Design parking facilities in a manner such that any vehicle on the property will be able to maneuver to exit from the property traveling in a forward direction. • Design parking facilities so that a car within a parking area will not have to enter a street to move from one location to another within the same site. • Use landscape areas, walkways, and plazas to reduce the visual impact of large surface parking areas. • Encourage right angle (900) parking stalls to minimize total surface parking area. • Design parking areas so that pedestrians walk parallel to moving cars. • Minimize situations where pedestrians must cross parking aisles at right angles. • Design the parking lot so that drive aisles are perpendicular to the main building wherever feasible. • Direct vehicular circulation through a parking area to the outer edge of the lot where there is less pedestrian traffic. • Direct vehicular circulation away from fire lanes. • Design the parking area to link the building to a sidewalk system that is an extension of the pedestrian walk system through the use of design elements such as painted or enhanced paving, architectural features, and/or landscape treatments. • Minimize the number of entrances and exits to reduce conflicts at entries and lessen possible congestion at street intersections. 5-65 5.0 Design Plan Exhibit 5.8-4 Screen Parking From View Exhibit 5.8-5 Pedestrians Move Perpendicular to Parking Spaces 5.8.6 Parking Structure Guidelines Parking structures will be found throughout the ARSP area, and their design is an important consideration in the overall visual quality of The Anaheim Resort. The design guidelines in this section and the requirements in Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards are intended to assure that parking structures incorporate design features, which make them more attractive. • Consider allowing climbing vines to grow on the surfaces of parking structures on elevations of the structure that face public streets. • Consider adding planters for hanging or climbing vines on the elevations of the The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) structure that face public streets. • Consider stepping back parking structures above the fourth level on elevations adjacent to a public street, when such structures exceed four levels in height. If a parking structure has frontage adjacent to two or more public streets, consider stepping the structure back on the street with the highest traffic volume. • Consider creating openings in the upper decks that allow light to lower levels for parking structures that are only one or two levels above grade, and permit trees to be planted on grade under the openings that, when mature, will extend above the structure. • Parking levels may be stepped or terraced to visually soften the overall mass of the structure. • Parking structure facade articulation should: o Create a sense of order through play of light, shadow and texture. o Minimize horizontal or vertical banding by balancing both vertical and horizontal elements. o Use openings, columns and beams to visually segment exterior surface and provide scale. o Spandrels are to be level and uniform when feasible. o Differentiate pedestrian and vehicular entrances. • Building design should employ clean, simple, geometric forms and coordinated massing that produce overall unity, scale and interest. Appropriate treatments include: o Straightforward geometry. o Unified composition. o Delineation of floor levels and structure. o Solid parapets. 5-66 5.0 Design Plan • Facades should reflect a coordinated design concept, including portrayal of building function, structure and scale. Appropriate treatments include: o Straightforward, functional design. o Expression of structure with columns and beams. o Unity and scale reinforced through an integrated grid module. o Surface delineation through use of reveals, mullions and recesses. • Detailing should be clean, clear and straightforward. Details should reinforce overall design unity, interest and scale. Appropriate treatments include: o Coordinated mullions and details. o Delineation and alignment of structural connections o Finishes commensurate with building materials. o Coordinated entry spaces and landscaping. • Street facades should be designed to be visually interesting and screen parked cars from exterior views. • Avoid horizontal banding. 5.8.7 Building Appearance Guidelines Building appearance guidelines in this section and the requirements in Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards address the following elements: massing, shape, scale, and materials. The intent of these guidelines and standards is to assure a harmonious relationship between buildings in the ARSP area without requiring a particular architectural theme. This can be achieved by careful attention to building massing, building materials and color. The guidelines in this section are intended to apply to both new construction and renovation of existing buildings. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Existing buildings may need more latitude in the interpretation of these guidelines because of the limited opportunities to make fundamental changes in building massing, for example, than would be possible in new construction. 5.8.8 360-Degree Architectural Treatments As part of DisneylandForward, design guidance for on -site buildings and structures visible from the public right-of-way and from abutting residentially -zoned properties, is provided in DRSP Section 5.7.9, 360- Degree Architectural Treatments. In the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area, 360- Degree Architectural Treatments is applicable to the Theme Park Overlay; refer to the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan for applicable guidelines. The 360-Degree Architectural Treatments criteria applies if it has been determined through a sight -line study submitted to the Planning and Building Department that a proposed building or structure will be visible by a 6- foot tall person from the furthest point of the ultimate public right-of-way on the opposite side of the street or from a point 400 feet from the property line on perpendicular streets, as detailed in DRSP Section 7.0, Zoning and Development Standards. Application of the design criteria for the highest height range for a proposed building or structure, in lieu of criteria for the lower height ranges, will be required all the way to grade unless the Planning and Building Director determines by review of a sight -line study that the fencing/walls and landscape buffers provided will adequately screen views of the proposed building or structure in the lower height range(s) from the public right-of-way. In the Theme Park East Overlay and the DRSP Southeast District, buildings or structures adjacent to the abutting 5-67 5.0 Design Plan residentially -zoned properties, application of the Greater than 30-Foot up to 50-Foot Height Level design criteria will be required for surfaces above 20 feet. 5.8.9 Building Massing Creating attractive building masses is an important factor contributing to the overall character of the Specific Plan area. The intent of the guidelines is to promote building mass that is rich visually and creates a more exciting and varied urban landscape, but does not place too much importance on any single building. Buildings, which have a large undifferentiated mass are often unattractive, and detract from the Specific Plan's goal of encouraging more pedestrian activity, because their size and scale make pe- destrians feel uncomfortable. The following guidelines are intended to guide designers in creating building masses that satisfy the goals of the Specific Plan. It is not necessary that every guideline be employed in the design of every building; rather, each guideline should be viewed as a suggestion that should be considered for any building in the Specific Plan area. • Create spaces with building masses, whenever possible; avoid creating building masses which are perceived as objects. • Design buildings to be members of a harmonious group, rather than independent, sculptural masses. • Use building mass to enhance the pedestrian scale of the street. Increase the articulation of building massing adja- cent to major pedestrian walks and gathering places. Increase landscape and architectural detail at the ground level. • Consider the location, size and scale of neighboring buildings when massing The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) new buildings. Create a harmonious relationship between adjacent facilities, regardless of whether or not they are on the same parcel. • Articulate the different parts of a building facade using color, arrangement of facade elements, a change in materials, or other architectural devices. • Vary the height of the building so that it appears to be divided into distinct elements. • Use rooflines to help establish the mass of a building; whenever feasible, the form of the roofline should physically represent its function; avoid mansard roofs. 5.8.10 Building Materials and Colors The intent of these guidelines is to encourage the use of materials and colors that enhance the physical cohesiveness of the area, and to convey a sense of permanence. Although no particular material is specifically prohibited, the use of some materials is discouraged because it would be difficult to achieve the guidelines' goal of promoting cohesiveness and permanence. 6.8.10.1 Walls • The preferred dominant material for walls is masonry in any of the following forms: natural stone (including granite, sandstone, marble and limestone), brick, stucco, poured in place or precast natural concrete (sandblasted, textured, or exposed aggregate), and painted concrete. • Wall materials that may be used with care include: o Split face, slump, or other forms of concrete block. o Shingle, clapboard, vertical, or angled wood siding. • Use of the following materials will 5-68 5.0 Design Plan require a special design solution or other unique condition in order to be successful: o Exotic wood treatments, such as distressed wood, pecky cedar, log cabin look, stained fir plywood, or gingerbread filigree. o Reflective (mirror) glass curtain wall. o Corrugated metal. o Imitation rock work. o Plastic molded imitations of any conventional building material. o Silver or clear anodized aluminum sheets. o Imitation wood siding. o Flat or molded plastic sheeting. o White brick. o Tilt -up concrete. o Antique or old brick with partial paint, mottled light variegated brick, oversized brick, and white brick mortar. • Discourage wall and/or window mounted room air conditioners unless they are concealed from public view, or are integrated into the architecture. 5.8.10.2 Windows • The preferred dominant material for windows is transparent or lightly tinted glass. • Lightly reflective or solar glass may be used above the first floor. • Windows of dark or highly reflective glass are not recommended, especially on the first floor elevations, and will require exceptional or unique solutions to make them acceptable. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 6.8.10.3 Roof Materials • When visible from the street, the preferred roof materials include natural colored terra cotta tile, concrete tile, and other similar materials. • Roof materials that will require a special design solution or other unique condition in order to be successful include: wood shakes, wood shingles, fiberglass shin- gles, composition shingles, corrugated metal and standing seam roofs. 6.8.10.4 Building Color Building color guidelines provide another means to visually unify the ARSP area by narrowing the range of choices to a group of colors that are visually compatible with one another. Although it is not the intent of the guidelines to eliminate any specific color from consideration or use within the Private Realm, the following criteria provide appropriate guidance for the selection of building color. • Encourage large building surface areas to be light colored. In general, accent elements, including, but not limited to, windows, doors, awnings, building trim and light fixtures may be either dark or light colored. • Limit the dominant surfaces of a building to only complementary colors; accent areas may include a greater variety of colors. 5.8.10.6 Awnings Awnings can be used to create an inviting space in front of a building where people may step away from the flow of pedestrian traffic and find a shady protected area. • Allow awnings that are continuous or broken to differentiate windows and display areas; awnings can become an important element in a storefront design as they may be used to unify a storefront with the whole building. ;• • e 5.0 Design Plan • Design the shape of the awning to fit the architecture. Awnings that are barrel shaped segmented arches or round - ended create distinctive images, but should be used sparingly and only when they do not conflict with the building's architectural elements. • Ensure the highest point of a first floor awning not be higher than the midpoint of the space between the second story window sills and the top of the first floor storefront window, awning, canopy, or transom. This attachment should leave a comfortable space between awning and architectural elements, which comprise the building. • Ensure that the awnings do not obstruct the views to adjacent businesses. • Avoid awnings of more than a single color per building. 5.8.11 Sign Guidelines Signs are one of the most visible design elements in the ARSP area. The purpose of establishing sign guidelines solely for the Specific Plan area is to: • Reinforce Identity. • Encourage graphic excellence. • Reduce conflicts between signs. • Improve appearance of the Specific Plan area. • Create consistency among signs. • Promote sign legibility. • Promote smooth flow of traffic as people are able to identify sites. The guidelines below establish positive criteria for the design of desirable signs and which complement the other building elements in the ARSP area. • Use a brief message. The fewer the words, the more effective the sign. A The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) sign with a brief, succinct message is simpler and faster to read, looks cleaner and is more attractive. • Avoid faddish and bizarre typefaces. Such typefaces may look good today, but soon go out of style. The image conveyed may quickly become that of a dated and unfashionable business. • Avoid hard -to -read, intricate typefaces. These typefaces reduce the sign's ability to communicate. • Select sign colors and materials to contribute to legibility and design integrity. Even the most carefully thought out sign may be unattractive and a poor communicator because of poor color selection. • Use significant contrast between the background and letter or symbol colors. If there is little contrast between the brightness or hue of the message of a sign and its background, it will be difficult to read. • Use complementary colors on signs. Too many colors overwhelm the basic function of communication. The colors compete with content for the viewer's attention. Limited use of the accent colors can increase legibility, while large areas of competing colors tend to confuse and disturb. Harmonize sign size with the scale of the structure. Place signs consistent with the proportions of scale of building elements within the facade. Within a building fa- cade, the sign may be placed in different areas. A particular sign may fit well on a plain wall area but would overpower the finer scale and proportion of the lower storefront. A sign appropriate near the building entry may look tiny and out of place above the ground level. Place wall signs to establish facade rhythm, scale and proportion where facade rhythm does not exist. In many 5-70 5.0 Design Plan buildings that have a monolithic or plain facade, signs can establish or continue appropriate design rhythm, scale, and proportion. • Use widely recognized logos rather than print/text whenever possible. • Avoid signs with strange shapes. Signs that are unnecessarily narrow or oddly shaped can restrict the legibility of the message. If an unusual shape is not symbolic, it is probably confusing. Consider carefully the proportion of letter area to overall sign background area. If letters take up too much sign, they may be harder to read. Large letters are not necessarily more legible than smaller ones. A general rule is that letters should not appear to occupy more than 75% of the sign panel area. Make signs smaller if they are oriented to pedestrians. The pedestrian -oriented sign should read from a distance of fifteen to twenty feet, the vehicle - oriented sign is viewed from a much greater distance. The closer a sign's viewing distance, the smaller that sign need be. Design wall signs to be appropriate to the building on which it is placed. The wall sign is an integral part of the building facade. The style of a wall sign should be appropriate to the style of a building's design. 5.8.12 Landscape Guidelines • Design landscape and open space areas to be an integral part of the overall site plan design. • Use trees to define and enclose exterior spaces, and to provide physical protection from the sun and wind. • Provide for landscaped open space areas that enhance the building design and public views and provide buffers and transitions between adjacent uses. • Use trees, shrubs and vines to conceal The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) walls, building elevations and parking facilities. • Use arbors, trellises, walls, gates and other elements to reinforce the architecture of adjacent buildings; land- scape structures should be compatible and consistent with the architectural treatment of the adjacent buildings. • Screen undeveloped, vacant land intended for future phases with plants that prevent wind and water erosion. • Space plants to assure unobstructed visual access for vehicles and pedestrians. • Ensure that plant materials do not interfere with security lighting, or restrict access to emergency apparatus such as fire hydrants or fire alarm boxes. • Provide simple, bold and easy to maintain landscape planting designs which incorporate many drought tolerant plant materials. • Landscape elements visible from the public right-of-way should blend with and seem a part of the public right-of- way landscaping. • Provide for plant palettes that include both long- and short-lived plant materials. Long-lived materials include trees and most shrubs; short-lived materials include perennials, annuals and some shrubs. • Select plant materials which are suited to the soil and climatic conditions of the site. • Minimize the use of water through the selection of plants that are drought tolerant when they are mature. • Space trees and shrubs with consideration for their ultimate size. • Ensure that all ground cover is healthy and densely foliated, and is comprised of well -rooted cuttings or container plants. 5-71 5.0 Design Plan • Provide a mix of plant material sizes in informal plantings. Exhibit 5.8-6 Landscaping Detail at Ground Level 5.8.13 Wall and Fence Guidelines • Use walls and fences for security, visual screening, and aesthetic purposes. • Ensure that walls and fences are consistent with the architecture of the adjacent building in terms of material, color, and form. • Avoid walls which feature long, unarticulated surfaces. Use pilasters, height variation, setback variation, land- scaping, and surface texture to vary the wall surface. • Provide walls and fences that are of the following preferred materials: masonry, wrought iron and painted steel tubing. 5.8.14 Pedestrian Paving Guidelines These guidelines for pedestrian pavements apply to all paved areas on private property intended for use by pedestrians, including areas to be used by both pedestrians and vehicles. Pedestrian pavements may include, but are not necessarily limited to: The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 5.0 Design Plan sidewalks, paths, walkways, courtyards, and o Wooden boardwalk type paving (not plazas. suitable where heels might catch in the cracks between the boards). • Desirable qualities of pedestrian paving surfaces: o A surface texture rough enough to prevent slipping, but smooth enough to prevent stumbling. o Maintenance free. o Stain resistant. o Fade resistant. o Non -reflective. • Acceptable pedestrian paving materials: o Concrete: broom finished, salt finished, heavy sandblasted. o Colored concrete. o Stamped and saw -cut concrete, provided the pattern does not have joints or score lines that catch high heels, or cause tripping. o Unit pavers, including brick, stone, concrete and tile, provided the pavers do not have joints or score lines that catch high heels, or cause tripping. • Pedestrian paving surfaces which may be used in situations where the limitations of the material have been considered include: o Decomposed granite (not suitable for use where disabled access should be provided). o Loose gravel (not suitable for use where disabled access should be provided, or where heavy pedestrian traffic can be expected). o White, or very light colored paving (not suitable where glare from the surface will affect pedestrian safety). o Asphalt (not suitable where the asphalt is likely to become soft on hot days). 5-72 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Exhibit 5.8-7 1 Wall/Fencing Plan 5.0 Design Plan `• ve�oRi_Pve 4 City}"Of= � r r `Anaheim Ball Rd'' Ball' RcJ' f off, - A ♦ cs bekin8' � AsPor_k I�'MOg1eaVJay� L — ; � 1 Q Cernfos Ave p rl ;ta i 1. � CemtosAve �( \ �I 0 - m ' a I r — G� city Of N� 1 r 1 DIs eyWSy �` inn ah eI Rl Theme Park; ICafellcl _Ave �,� ®e y, t r R 1 4 I� P Katella IF; A I ` eYMla __j Gene Autry Way- + � N CO BOUNDARY, I - r — — — - Orangewood AveOR r mil r Way City of Garden.:Grove I � I l 1 City of IOrange Wall/Fencing Plan LEGEND The Anaheim Resort Boundary The Anaheim Resort I_ .+ Specific Plan Boundary C J City Boundary MAP FEATURES AffileNeWIND Sound attenuation wall permitted at surface parking areas with min. height of 12 feet and max. height of 16 feet, subject to A.M.C. Chapter 18.114 5-73 Notes/Sources City Legal Lot Dot.. 2022 City Boundary Data, 2022 0 750 1,500 IIIA ♦_® Feet fir: MARCH 2O24 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 6.0 General Plan Consistency PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Section 6.0: General Plan Consistency California Government Code §65450-§65453 permits the adoption and administration of Specific Plans as an implementation tool for elements contained within the local General Plan. The City of Anaheim General Plan provides guidance for long-term growth and development in the City through comprehensive plans for future development. Specific Plans must demonstrate consistency in regulations, guidelines and programs with the goals, objectives, policies, programs and uses that are set forth in the General Plan. Table 5.9-1 of Supplemental Environmental impact Report No. addresses the consistency of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) with the relevant City of Anaheim General Plan Goals and Policies and said table is incorporated by reference into the ARSP. For Disneyland Forward, Table 5.10-1 of Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 352 addresses the consistency of the ARSP with the relevant City of Anaheim General Plan Goals and Policies. This table is herein incorporated into the Specific Plan by reference. 6-1 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 6.0 General Plan Consistency PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) This page is intentionally blank. 6-2 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 7.0 Zoning and Development Standards PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) For purposes of the Planning Commission hearing documents, this Chapter is provided as Attachment No. 4b of the staff report. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 8.0 Legal Description AN 8.0 Legal Description S_ - n gar — ,t The Anahelm Resort Speciflc Plan LEGAL DESCRIPTION a 9sIS Q `KA TE AVE +CrtY of Garden Grove Kt y ;b Fires Amman Earl spedve Plan sawca 5�Y ter- SueE YE-AsM 8-1 CHA4PUAN clfr0f Crarig it The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 'vERMdN..�s - 8.0 Legal Description Inset 1 ■j;,/ Feet u Anaheim Resort specific Plan Boundary 0 The Anaheim Resort°' Boundary 8-2 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 8.0 Legal Description Legal Descriptions °� "o Inset 2 Fee 1�' Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Boundary ,_a The Anaheim Resort"" Boundary 8-3 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) 311� I 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 1 Legal Descriptions Inset 3 0 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Boundary I—J The Anaheim Resort"' Boundary .. 7 I_ Anaheim City Boundary i"`wA-"j ORANGEWOOD t-#--370" AVE 8.0 Legal Description a t0 ■ 1 " a, i N ■ 1 8-4 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Appendix A PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) APPENDIX A: List of Specific Plan Amendments, Adjustments and Associated Actions The following is a consolidated list of past Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) amendments, adjustments, and associated actions since the original ARSP adoption in 1994. ARSP Amendment No. 1. On June 3, 1997, the City Council approved Amendment No. 1 in connection with an amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan and Conditional Use Permit No. 3917. These actions designated 4.67 acres, located on the northern side of Orangewood Avenue and east of Harbor Boulevard, for Commercial Recreation land use and incorporated the site into the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (SP92-2) Zone. The General Plan Amendment amended the Land Use Element to designate the site from Medium Density Residential to Commercial Recreation land uses with a density of Low -Medium permitting up to 75 hotel rooms per gross acre. The Specific Plan Amendment reclassified the site from the RM-1200 (Residential, Multiple -Family) Zone to the SP92-2 Zone, C-R District. Conditional Use Permit No. 3917 approved the conversion of an existing 139-unit, 2-story, 8-building apartment complex into a 136-unit Vacation Ownership Resort. The City Council approved these actions by adopting Resolution Nos. 97R-73, 97R-74 and 97R-75 on May 20, 1997, and adopting Ordinance No. 5599 on June 3, 1997. Prior to approving Amendment No. 1, the City Council, by motion, on May 20, 1997, determined that Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0096 were adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for this request. ARSP Adjustment No.1, On May 18, 1999, the City Council approved Adjustment No. 1, which amended Chapter 18.116 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 92-2 (SP92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) to modify the setback and yard requirements to reflect the local street status of Convention Way by Ordinance No. 5685. The City Council found that this amendment was categorically exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), which provides that where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. ARSP Amendment No. 2. [Withdrawn by the applicant.] ARSP Amendment No. 3 On August 17, 1999, the City Council approved Amendment No. 3 in connection with an amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan. Amendment No. 3 reclassified and incorporated a 0.73-acre site, located at the northwestern corner of Casa Grande Avenue and Casa Vista Street, from the RM-1200 (Residential, Multiple -Family) Zone to the ARSP Zone, amended ARSP text, exhibits, legal description and zoning and development standards to reflect said reclassification. The General Plan Amendment amended the Land Use Element to designate the project site from Medium Density Residential to Commercial Recreation with a density of Low -Medium permitting up to 75 hotel rooms per gross acre based on the total gross acreage of the four lots, and not a per lot or parcel basis. Amendment No. 3 and the associated General Plan Amendment were approved by Resolution No. 99R-166 and 99R-167 adopted on July 27, 1999 and by Ordinance No. 5694 adopted on August 17, 1999. Prior to approving Amendment No. 3, the City Council, by motion, on July 27, 1999, determined that a A-1 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Appendix A PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0108 were adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for this request. MEIR First Validation Report. On August 30, 1999, the Planning Commission determined that no substantial changes had occurred with respect to the circumstances under which MEIR No. 313 was certified, and that there was no new available material information which was not known and could not have been known at the time MEIR No. 313 was certified, thereby validating MEIR No. 313 and the associated Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085 for continued use as the environmental documentation required by CEQA for projects within the ARSP. ARSP Adiustment No. 2. On September 21, 1999, the City Council approved Adjustment No. 2 to the ARSP to amend Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 92-2 (SP92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) to modify the minimum landscape setback requirement for properties adjacent to Manchester Avenue between Katella Avenue and the southern boundary of the ARSP Zone. The City Council approved this action by adopting Ordinance No. 5703, including a finding that this amendment is categorically exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), which provides that where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. On August 8, 2000, the City Council subsequently adopted Ordinance No. 5734 to correct an clerical error in the Code that was adopted by Ordinance No. 5703. ARSP Adiustment No. 3. On May 1, 2001, the City Council approved Adjustment No. 3 to the ARSP to amend Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 92-2 (SP92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) relating to temporary parking requirements including time limitations, landscape, and screening requirements, and permitted fence and wall materials. The City Council approved this action by adopting Ordinance No. 5769, including a finding that this amendment is categorically exempt from CEQA under CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3), which provides that where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity was not subject to CEQA. ARSP Adiustment No. 4. On April 27, 2004, the City Council approved Adjustment No. 4 to the ARSP to amend Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 92-2 (SP92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) to permit office uses in a legal non -conforming building subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Ordinance No. 5910 included a finding that the previously - certified MEIR No. 313 and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085 was adequate to serve as environmental documentation for this request. ARSP Amendment Nos. 4 and 5. On June 8, 2004, the City Council approved Amendment No. 5 to the ARSP (which also incorporates Amendment No. 4) in connection with a citywide General Plan and Zoning Code Update (ZCA 2004-00029). ARSP Amendment No. 4 included modifications to Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 92-2 (SP92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) intended to streamline project review processes. Amendment No. 5 expanded The Anaheim Resort boundaries to include approximately 26.4 acres located along Harbor Boulevard, from Orangewood Avenue to the south city limit, into the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (SP92-2) Zone. The City Council approved these actions by adopting Resolution Nos. 2004R-95 and 2004R- 97 on May 25, 2004, and by adopting Ordinance Nos. 5920 and 5922 adopted by June 8, 2004. ►_M The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Appendix A PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Prior to approving Amendment No. 5, the City Council, by Resolution No. 2004-94, on May 25, 2004, certified Environmental Impact Report No. 330 prepared for the citywide General Plan Amendment and Zoning Code Update, adopted a statement of findings and overriding considerations in connection therewith and adopting Mitigation Monitoring Program 85a, to serve as the required environmental documentation for this request. MEIR Second Validation Report. On September 20, 2004, the Planning Commission determined that no substantial changes had occurred with respect to the circumstances under which MEIR No. 313 was certified, and that there was no new available material information which was not known and could not have been known at the time MEIR No. 313 was certified, thereby validating MEIR No. 313 and the associated Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085 for continued use as the environmental documentation required by CEQA for projects within the ARSP. ARSP Amendment No. 6. On February 8, 2005, the City Council approved Amendment No. 6 to the ARSP in connection with a zone change (Reclassification No. 2004-00135) to remove the Mobile Home Park (MHP) Overlay from a property within the ARSP and Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-04922. Amendment No. 6 modified Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 92-2 (SP92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) to permit the relocation of an existing service station facility with frontage on Harbor Boulevard to a location not fronting Harbor Boulevard, allowed accessory convenience markets to sell beer and wine for off -premise consumption, as an accessory use to service stations, and prohibited tow truck operations in conjunction with service station facilities. These actions were approved by Ordinance Nos. 5954 and 5955, including a finding that the previously -certified MEIR No. 313 and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 067 incorporating measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085 were adequate to serve as required environmental documentation for this request. ARSP Adiustmen_t No. 5. On August 22, 2006, the City Council approved Adjustment No. 5 to the ARSP to amend Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 92-2 (SP92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) in its entirety to provide consistent formatting with Title 18 (Zoning Code) along with minor modifications and clarifications. The City Council approved this action by adopting Ordinance No. 6031 on August 22, 2006. The Planning Commission determined, on July 10, 2006 that the Previously -Certified Environmental Impact Report No. 330 was adequate to serve as required environmental documentation for this request. ARSP Amendment No. 7. On September 12, 2006, the City Council approved Amendment No. 7 to the ARSP in connection with an amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan to amend Chapter 18.116 pertaining to the establishment of an ARR (Anaheim Resort Residential) Overlay to provide the opportunity to develop residential units in conjunction with high -quality, luxury hotels within two targeted areas by Resolution No. 2006-205 and 2006-206 adopted on August 22, 2006 and by Ordinance No. 6036 adopted on September 12, 2006. Prior to approving Amendment No. 7, the City Council, by motion, on August 22, 2006, determined that the Anaheim Resort Residential Overlay Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085b were adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for this request. A-3 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Appendix A PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) ARSP Amendment No. 8. On May 8, 2007, the City Council approved Amendment No. 8 to the ARSP in connection with an amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan to amend Chapter 18.116 pertaining to development criteria for wholly -residential development within the ARR Overlay on a designated 26.7-acre site within the ARSP Zone by Resolution No. 2007- 052 and 2007-053 adopted on April 24, 2007 and by Ordinance No. 6058 adopted on May 8, 2007. Prior to approving Amendment No. 8, the City Council, by Resolution No. 2007-052, determined that an Addendum (dated May 23, 2006) to the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration for Amendment No.7 was adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for this request. ARSP Amendment No. 9. On March 4, 2008, the City Council approved Amendment No. 9 to the ARSP to repeal modifications to the Zoning and Development Standards, previously approved by Amendment No. 8 to the ARSP, and an amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan. Amendment No. 9 removed provisions in Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 92- 2 (SP92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) related to wholly -residential development, with the exception of residential uses in certain targeted areas when such uses are fully integrated into a minimum 300-room full service hotel (as approved by Amendment No. 7). The City Council took these actions by adopting Resolution Nos. 2007-224, 2077-225, 2007-226, 2007-227 adopted on November 27, 2007, and by adopting Ordinance No. 6099 on March 4, 2008. Under Resolution No. 2008-016, the City Council found that the City's Actions, either individually or collectively, did not constitute a "project" under Public Resources Code Sections 21065 and 21080, and alternatively, (2) even assuming the City Actions could be deemed a "project," that the City Actions, individually and collectively, were exempt from the requirements of CEQA under State CEQA Guideline Section 15061(b)(3). ARSP Amendment No. 10. [Withdrawn by the applicant.] ARSP Amendment No. 11. On March 4, 2008, the City Council approved Amendment No. 11 to the ARSP, an initiative measure ("SOAR") pursuant to the provisions of Section 1303 of the Anaheim City Charter and Section 9214 of the Elections Code of the State of California, to generally prohibit residential development within The Anaheim Resort unless such a project included environmental and economic analysis, City Council approval, and voter approval at a City election by adopting Ordinance No. 6098. Prior to introducing Ordinance No. 6098, the City Council, by Resolution No. 2008-016, on February 26, 2008, determined that the amendment did not constitute a "Project" subject to, and within the meaning of, the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), and that said proposed action is exempt from CEQA, and that no further environmental review was therefore required. ARSP Amendment No. 12. On October 14, 2008, the City Council approved Amendment No. 12 to the ARSP to redesignate a 5.9-acre, "L"-shaped property at Ball Road and Walnut Street from Low -Density to Medium Density to develop a 120-room hotel in connection with a Variance, Final Site Plan and Tentative Parcel Map. The City Council approved these requests by adopting Resolution Nos. 2008-168, 2008-169, and 2008-170 on September 30, 2008, and by adopting Ordinance No. 6117 on October 14, 2008. Prior to approving Amendment No. 12, the City Council, by motion, on September 30, 2008, determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration and the A-4 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Appendix A associated Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 000003 was adequate for the required environmental documentation for this request. ARSP Amendment No. 13. On April 14, 2009, the City Council approved Amendment No. 13 to the ARSP, an amendment to the Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program, a Conditional Use Permit, a Variance, a Determination of Public Convienence and Necessity, and a Final Site Plan to construct a 252-room hotel with supporting accessory uses. These amendments modified the text in the General Plan Land Use Element and the ARSP to reflect a new density category called "Low Medium Density (Modified)"; modified the Central Core and Special Intersection Landscape Treatment exhibits to allow special landscape and hardscape treatments at the corner of Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue; allowed a greater number and larger signs than currently permitted for hotels and accessory retail; allowed changeable copy signs for hotels when not visible from any public right-of-way, murals and building integrated multi -tenant signs subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The City Council approved these requests by adopting Resolution Nos. 2009-053, 2009-054, 2009-055, 2009-056, 2009-057, 2009-058 and 2009-059 adopted on March 31, 2009, and by adopting Ordinance No. 6141 on April 14, 2009. Prior to approving Amendment No. 13, the City Council, by motion, on March 31, 2009, determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated Monitoring Program No. 156 were adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the request. ARSP Adiustment No. 6. On June 5, 2012, the City Council approved Adjustment No. 6 to the ARSP to amend Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 92-2 (SP92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) to modify the Code references and terminology for various uses to be consistent with Chapters 18.16 (Regulatory Permits) and 18.92 (Definitions) of Title 18 (Zoning Code). The City Council approved this action by adopting Ordinance No. 6245 on June 5, 2012. The Planning Commission determined, by motion, on March 26, 2012 that this action was exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 21080 of the Public Resources Code. ARSP Amendment No. 14. On December 18, 2012, the City Council approved Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP, in connection with an amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan, to update the ARSP to reflect current development conditions and regulations and increase the maximum allowable square footage in the Public Recreational (PR) District to accommodate the future expansion of the Anaheim Convention Center. These actions were in conjunction with amendments to The Anaheim Resort Identity Program and The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program. The City Council approved these requests by adopting Resolution Nos. 2012- 158, 2012-159, 2012-160, 2012-161 and 2012-162 adopted on December 18, 2012, and by Ordinance No. 6265 adopted on January 15, 2013. Subsequently, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6266 on January 29, 2013 pertaining to Specific Plan conditions of approval. Prior to approving Amendment No. 14, the City Council, by Resolution No. 2012-158, on December 18, 2012, certified Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 2008-00340 ("FSEIR No. 340"), adopting Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, adopting Mitigation Monitoring Program 85C, and a Water Supply Assessment to serve as the required environmental documentation for this request. ARSP Adiustment No. 7. On March 3, 2015, the City Council approved Adjustment No. 7 to the ARSP to amend Chapter 18.116, Table 116-C (Primary Uses and Structures: C-R District A-5 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Appendix A (Development Area 1) of Section 18.116.070 (Uses — Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1)) to prohibit "Computer Internet and Amusement Facilities," in conjunction with a City-wide prohibition by Ordinance No. 6317. The Planning Commission determined, by motion, on January 12, 2015 that this action was not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15060(C)(2) and 15060(C)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines. ARSP Adjustment No. 8_ On October 18, 2016, the City Council approved Adjustment No. 8 to the ARSP to amend Chapter 18.116.030 (Definitions) to include a definition for "Concierge Lounge," Table 116-C (Primary Uses and Structures: C-R District (Development Area 1), Table 116-D (Accessory Uses and Structures Integrated With a Permitted Primary Use: C-R District (Development Area 1)) and Table 116-E (Accessory Uses Incidental to and Integrated Within a Hotel or Motel Including Suite -Type Hotels, and Otherwise Limited Herein: C-R District (Development Area 1)) of Section 18.116.070 (Uses — Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1)) of Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) of Title 18 (Zoning) to include (1) "Concierge Lounges" as a permitted accessory use; (2) "Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing" as a permitted and conditionally permitted use subject to the requirements of Section 18.38.025; and (3) "Transitional and Supportive Housing" as a prohibited use in conjunction with a City-wide Zoning Code Update by Ordinance No. 6382. The Planning Commission determined, by motion, on August 8, 2016 that this action was not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15060(C)(2) of the State CEQA Guidelines. ARSP Adiustment No. 9. On April 10, 2018, the City Council approved Adjustment No. 9 to the ARSP to amend Table 116-D (Accessory Uses and Structures Integrated with a Permitted Primary Use: C-R District (Development Area 1)) to permit Valet Parking as an accessory use, subject to approval of a minor conditional use permit in conjunction with a City-wide Zoning Code Update by Ordinance No. 6432. The Planning Commission determined, by motion, on February 5, 2018, that the request was exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3). ARSP Amendment No. 15.On August 14, 2018, the City Council approved Amendment No. 15 to the ARSP in connection with an amendment to the Land Use Element of the City's General Plan, a Variance, a Final Site Plan, a Minor Conditional Use Permit, and an Administrative Adjustment. These amendments created a new density category called "Medium Density (Modified)" in the Commercial Recreation (C-R) District to allow up to 345 hotel rooms or its equivalent at 1411 and 1441 South Manchester to accommodate development of a 223-room hotel with 1,516 square feet of accessory retail space and 975 square feet of meeting space on the 2.5-acre site. The City Council approved Resolution No. 2018-104 on July 31, 2018 and adopted Ordinance No. 6443 on August 14, 2018. The City Council determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated Monitoring Program No. 350 were adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the request. SEIR No. 340 First Validation Report. On April 1, 2019, the Planning Commission determined that no substantial changes had occurred with respect to the circumstances under which SEIR No. 340 was certified, and that there was no new available material information which was not known and could not have been known at the time SEIR No. 340 was certified, thereby validating SEIR A-6 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) Appendix A No. 340 and the associated Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C for continued use as the environmental documentation required by CEQA for projects within the ARSP. ARSP Adjustment No. 10. On December 3, 2019, the City Council approved Adjustment No. 10 to assign review authority of Final Site Plans in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan to the Planning Director; to allow Day Care Centers as a primary use, subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit; and consolidate Boat & RV Sales with Automotive — Vehicle Sales, Lease, and Rentals in conjunction with a City-wide Zoning Code Update by Ordinance No. 6473. The City Council determined that the request was exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3). ARSP Amendment No. 16. On September 29, 2020, the City Council approved Amendment No. 16 to the ARSP, in conjunction with a General Plan Amendment, a Minor Conditional Use Permit, a Variance, a Final Site Plan, and an Administrative Adjustment to create a new density category "Medium Density (Modified A)" in the Commercial Recreation (C-R) District, to allow construction of a 125-room hotel with accessory uses at 1730 South Clementine Street. The City Council approved the request by adopting Resolution No. 2020-112, 2020-113, and 2020-114 on September 15, 2020, and by adopting Ordinance No. 6494 on September 29, 2020. Prior to introducing Ordinance No. 6494, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-112, determining that a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 372 were adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the request. ARSP Adjustment No. 11.On September 29, 2020, the City Council approved Adjustment No. 11 to the ARSP to provide standards and regulations for unlicensed community care facilities and sober living facilities that are not operating as a single housekeeping unit. The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6493 on September 29, 2020, and determined that the request was exempt from further environmental review per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3). ARSP Adiustment No. 12. On February 9, 2021, the City Council approved Adjustment No. 12 to the ARSP as part of a comprehensive Zoning Code update, which included amendments to the ARSP regulations to prohibit dual -lit signs and allow the encroachment of outdoor dining in required street setbacks. The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6506 on February 9, 2021, and determined that the request was exempt from further environmental review per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). ARSP Adjustment No. 13. On April 4, 2023, the City Council approved Adjustment No. 13 to the ARSP as part of a comprehensive Zoning Code update, which clarified the maximum height of six feet for the transparent portion of outdoor dining enclosures within the street setback for properties within the ARSP. The City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6555 on April 4, 2023, and determined that the request was exempt from further environmental review per California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3). ARSP Amendment No. 17. On [date], the City Council approved ARSP Amendment No. 17 (Disneyland Forward), an update to The Disneyland Resort Project to allow for the transfer of uses permitted under the Specific Plan to other areas of the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and A-7 The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Appendix A PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT (MARCH 2O24) properties within the Specific Plan owned or leased by Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. or other subsidiaries of The Walt Disney Company (Disney). ARSP Amendment No. 17 also provided for future administrative review by the City of Disney's development projects on Disney property within the Specific Plan and the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. Disneyland Forward did not increase previously approved square footage or hotel rooms in the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan or the Specific Plan, however, it increased the number of theme park -related parking spaces in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Parking Overlay by 4,376 spaces. ARSP Amendment No. 17 and its associated actions were approved by [insert] and adopted on [date]. The City Council certified Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) No. 352 on [date]. In serving as the CEQA compliance document for Disneyland Forward, SEIR No. 352 provided the environmental analysis required for the addition of theme park uses in the ARSP Theme Park East and ARSP Theme Park West Overlays and the additional of parking uses in the ARSP Parking Overlays. A-8 EXHIBIT "D" "MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (MMP) NO.387" [Behind this sheet.] (DEV2021-00069) EXHIBIT D DisneylandFonaard Final Subseauent EIR No. 352 SECTION 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM (MMP) NO.000387 (INCLUDING PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES) FOR THE DISNEYLAND RESORT PROJECT AS AMENDED BY THE DISNEYLANDFORWARD PROJECT CEQA Action I Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 352 (Resolution No. ) I Project Description I General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan No. 92-1 Amendment No. 9, and Specific Plan No. 92-2 Amendment No. 17 Applicant I Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc., 500 South Buena Vista Street, Burbank, California, Project Location The Project site is located approximately 35 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles and seven miles northwest of Santa Ana, in central Orange County, California, and is generally located adjacent to and southwest of the Interstate 5 (1-5), between Ball Road to the north, Walnut Street to the west, and Chapman Avenue to the south. The Project site encompasses The Disneyland Resort, including the Theme Park, Parking and Southeast Districts of the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (DRSP), and properties in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1) owned or controlled by Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. (Disney) or other subsidiaries of The Walt Disney Terms and Definitions 1. Applicant -Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. 2. Property Owner/Developer — Any owner or developer of properties owned by Disney or other subsidiaries of The Walt Disney Company within the DRSP or the ARSP. 3. Project Design Features (PDFs) — Measures incorporated into The Disneyland Resort Project as amended by the Disneyland Forward Project by the applicant with the intent of minimizing potential environmental impacts. The PDFs included in this Mitigation Monitoring Program will be implemented as mitigation measures. 4. Environmental Equivalent/Timing — To the extent permitted by law, if Disney cannot complete any PDF or Mitigation Measure and timing thereof, the City may specify another substituted measure, which (i) will have the same or superior result, (ii) will have the same or superior effect on the environment, and (iii) has a nexus to the Project. The Planning Department, in conjunction with any appropriate agencies or City departments, shall determine the adequacy of any proposed "environmental equivalent/timing" based on substantial evidence and, if determined necessary, may refer said determination to the Planning Commission. Any costs associated with information required to make a determination of environmental equivalency/timing shall be borne by the Applicant. 5. Responsibility for Monitoring — Shall mean that compliance with the subject mitigation measure(s) shall be reviewed and determined adequate by all departments listed for each mitigation measure. 6. Ongoing Mitigation Measures —The mitigation measures that are designated to occur on an ongoing basis as part of this mitigation monitoring program will be monitored in the form of an annual letter from the Property Owner/Developer and/or Applicant in January of each year stating how compliance with the R:1Projects%WD113WD1000400kEnvimnmentaI DocumentationTinal SEIRT1na1_SEIR-022824.do 4-1 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 subject measure(s) has been achieved. Mitigation Measures are referenced in parentheses by their section number as identified in the Draft Subsequent EIR No. 352. Mitigation Measures and/or PDFs designated to occur on an ongoing basis are noted with an asterisk (*). For mitigation measures/PDFs that are to be monitored "Ongoing During Construction", the annual letter will review those mitigation measures/PDFs only while construction is occurring; monitoring will be discontinued after construction is complete. A final annual letter will be provided at the close of construction. 7. The City recognizes that the certain infrastructure improvements and service capabilities, as identified in this Mitigation Monitoring Program, will serve not only the Applicant but also other property owners/developers in the Specific Plan area, The Anaheim Resort, and the service area, each of which should contribute in allocable share of the cost of these improvements. To implement this requirement as it applies to other property owners/developers in the Specific Plan area, The Anaheim Resort, and the service area, the City shall make appropriate arrangements with other public agencies, if any, to reimburse the Applicant to the extent that its contributions for these improvements exceed the Applicant's allocable share of the cost. Such arrangements shall include one or more of the following: (1) creation of integrated financing districts; (2) entry into a reimbursement agreement with the Applicant; (3) creation of appropriate community facilities districts, assessment districts and/or use of similar public financing districts and/or mechanisms; and (4) creation of such other mechanisms or districts as may be appropriate to provide for the reimbursement of these costs. The determination of the allocable share of improvement costs attributable to the Applicant and other property owners/developers, and reimbursement amounts, shall be based on an apportionment of the costs of such improvements and equipment and personnel among property owners/developers, including the Applicant, in the Specific Plan area, The Anaheim Resort, or otherwise defined service area, as applicable, depending on the area served. 8. To the extent that this Mitigation Monitoring Program requires the Applicant to submit plans for several phases simultaneously, it is understood that such later phase plans may be considered preliminary and may be subject to change. Such preliminary plans for the later phase will not be required to provide the level of detail required for the initial phase plans provided that more detailed plans will be submitted separately at a later time. Nevertheless, such preliminary plans for the later phase shall provide sufficient schematic or descriptive detail to ensure that plans submitted for said later phase shall comply with the provisions of this Mitigation Monitoring Program and shall be consistent with the provisions of the initial phase plans. 9. Timing — This is the point where a mitigation measure/PDF must be monitored for compliance. In the case where multiple action items are indicated, it is the first point where compliance associated with the mitigation measure/PDF must be monitored. Once the initial action item has been complied with, no additional monitoring pursuant to the Mitigation Monitoring Program will occur, as routine City practices and procedures will ensure that the intent of the measure design feature has been complied with. For example, if the timing is "to be shown on approved building plans" subsequent to issuance of the building permit consistent with the approved plans will be final building and zoning inspections pursuant to the building permit to ensure compliance. 10. Building Permit — For purposes of this Mitigation Monitoring Program, a building permit shall be defined as any permit issued for construction of a new building or structural expansion/modification of any existing building, but shall not include any permits required for interior tenant improvements or minor additions of up to 1,000 square feet to an existing structure or building. R:1Projects1WD113WD10004001Environmental DawmentationTinal SEIRTinal SEIR-022824.dom 4-2 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent E!R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Responsible for Timing Measure Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number Aesthetics MM AES-1 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall submit plans which illustrate that all mechanical Planning & Building building permit; to be equipment and trash areas for the subject buildings will be screened from adjacent Department, Planning implemented prior to final public streets and adjacent residential areas. Services Division building and zoning inspections MM AES-2 Prior to final building and Private streets within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area shall have street lights Planning & Building zoning inspections installed which are compatible with the design standards used for the public streets as Department, Planning determined by the Public Utilities Department. Services Division; Public Utilities Department MM AES-3 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall submit plans which detail the lighting system for Planning & Building building permit for each the parking facilities along Walnut Street, Ball Road, Haster Street and along interior Department, Planning parking facility along property lines abutting residential neighborhoods. The systems shall be designed and Services Division Walnut Street; to be maintained in such a manner as to conceal light sources to the extent feasible to implemented prior to each minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent uses. The plans shall be prepared and final building and zoning signed by a licensed electrical engineer, with a letter from the engineer stating that, in inspection the opinion of the engineer, this requirement has been met. MM AES-4 Prior to final building and The property owner/developer shall participate in a landscape assessment and Planning and Building zoning inspection or maintenance district for the Anaheim Resort. Department, Planning whenever established; and Services Division on an ongoing basis Utilities Department, Resource Efficiency Section MM AES-5 Prior to approval of each A Construction Barrier Plan showing the location and types of barriers shall be in place Public Works grading plan or issuance of during grading and construction. Said plan shall provide for all construction areas to Department, Traffic each demolition or building be screened from view in compliance with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code and and Transportation permits, whichever occurs shall include provision for the type and height of the barriers to be placed along all Division; Planning & first construction perimeters prior to the commencement of demolition, Site preparation or Building Department, grading, whichever occurs first. Planning Services Division R,%Projects1WD113WDI000400\Environmental DocumentationWinal SEIR%Final_SEIR-022824.docx 4-3 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion Number MM AES-6 Prior to issuance of each The proposed Specific Plan incorporates design guidelines as well as zoning and Planning & Building building permit development standards, many of which have been designed to reduce the potential Department, Planning visual impacts of the project and to present a visually integrated resort area, including: Services Division • The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan provides for heavily landscaped streetscapes and gives the guidelines for trees and shrubs, light fixtures, benches, monuments, and signs located within the landscaped area. • The East and West Parking Areas and the hotel parking facilities will have landscaped setbacks from the public right-of-way and are restricted in height. • Rights -of -way will be landscaped to add to the aesthetics of the area. • The landscape treatments will vary to create distinct places visually. • The West Parking Area and hotel parking facilities will be terraced back from Walnut Street with landscaping treatments above 40 feet. In addition, canopy trees will be planted in a center median on Walnut Street, and the parkway along the street will be landscaped. • A coordinated color theme for major street features will be incorporated into the design. • The service areas and back -of -house areas will be screened from public view. • All rooftop equipment on buildings will be screened as per the Specific Plan. • A layered landscape treatment in the setback realm will provide screening of a 9-14 feet in height sound wall adjacent to the Southwest Parking Area. MM AES-7 Prior to issuance of building All plumbing or other similar pipes and fixtures located on the exterior of the building Planning & Building permits shall be shown on plans as fully screened from view of adjacent public rights -of -way Department, Planning and from adjacent properties by architectural devices and/or appropriate building Services Division materials. A note indicating that these improvements will be installed prior to final building and zoning inspections shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. MM AES-8 Prior to issuance of each All air conditioning facilities and other roof and ground -mounted equipment shall be Planning & Building building permit shown on plans as shielded from public view and the sound buffered to comply with Department, Building City of Anaheim noise ordinances from any adjacent residential or transient -occupied Division properties. A note indicating that these improvements shall be installed prior to final building and zoning inspections shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. R15rojects1WDI13WD10004001Environmental DocumentationWinal SEIRTinal_SEIR-022824.docx 4-4 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent E!R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion Number MM AES-9 Prior to issuance of each Plans shall show compliance with the 360-Degree Architectural Treatment Criteria set building permit for theme forth in the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan. Planning & Building park uses within the Theme Department, Planning Park District, the Southeast Services Division District, and the ARSP Theme Park Overlays MM AES-10 Prior to issuance of each Plans shall show that no shuttle/bus/vehicular drop-off areas shall be permitted in hotel Planning & Building building permit or vacation ownership resort front setback area. Department, Planning Services Division MM AES-11 Ongoing The property owner/developer shall be responsible for the removal of any on -site Planning & Building graffiti within 24 hours of its application. Department, Code Root and sidewalk barriers shall be provided for trees within seven feet of public Enforcement Division MM AES-12 Prior to final building and Planning & Building zoning inspections sidewalks. Department, Planning Services Division; Public Works Department, Development Services Division NM AES-13 Prior to final building and The property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department Planning & Building zoning inspections a letter from a licensed landscape architect certifying that all landscaping and irrigation Department, Planning systems have been installed in accordance with landscaping plans approved in Services Division connection with the building permit. MM AES-14 Ongoing All on -site non -Public Realm landscaping and irrigation systems, and Public Realm Planning & Building landscaping and irrigation systems, within an area in which dedication has not been Department, Planning accepted by the City, shall be maintained by the property owner/developer, in Services Division; compliance with City standards. MM AES-15 Ongoing Any tree planted within the Setback Realm shall be replaced in a timely manner in the Planning & Building event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead. Department, Planning Services Division MM AES-16 Ongoing A licensed arborist shall be hired by the property owner/developer to be responsible Planning & Building for all tree trimming. Department, Planning Services Division R:1ProjectskWD113WD10004001Environmentol DocumentationlFinal SEIR%Final SEIR-022824.docx 4-55 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number Public Works MM AES-17 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall pay a fee for street tree purposes to the City of building permits, unless Anaheim based on the length of street frontage in an amount as established by City Department, records indicate previous Council resolution or credit against the fee given for City authorized improvements Development Services payment installed by the property owner/developer. Division MM AES-18 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall submit a shade and shadow analysis to the Planning & Building building permit Planning and Building Department for review and approval demonstrating that the Department, Planning proposed structure(s) would avoid creating significant shade and shadow impacts on Services Division adjacent land uses to the maximum extent feasible. A significant shade and shadow impact would occur when outdoor active areas (e.g., outdoor eating areas, hotel/motel swimming pools, and residential front and back yards) or structures that include sensitive uses (e.g., residences) have windows that normally receive sunlight are covered by shadows for more than 50 percent of the sunlight hours. MM AES-19 Prior to issuance of each The location and configuration of all lighting fixtures including ground -mounted Planning & Building building permit lighting fixtures utilized to accent buildings, landscape elements, or to illuminate Department, Planning pedestrian areas shall be shown on all plans submitted for building permits. All Services Division proposed surface parking area lighting fixtures shall be down -lighted with a maximum height of 12 feet adjacent to any residential properties. All lighting fixtures shall be shielded to direct lighting toward the area to be illuminated and away from adjacent residential property lines. Air Quality MM AQ-1 Prior to final building and The property owner/developer shall comply with all SCAQMD offset regulations and Planning & Building zoning inspection implementation of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) and Best Available Department, Planning Retrofit Control Technology (BARCT) for any new or modified stationary sources. Services Division Copies of permits shall be given to the Planning Department. MM AQ-2 Ongoing during operation of The property owner/developer shall implement the following measures to reduce Planning & Building The Disneyland Resort emissions: Department, Planning a. To the extent practicable, schedule goods movements for off-peak traffic hours. Services Division; Public Works b. Use clean fuel for attraction rides and other uses, as practicable. Department, Traffic and Transportation Division; Utilities Department, Resource Efficiency Section R:1Projects%WDI10WD10004001Envimnmental Documentation\Final SEIRIFinal_SEIR-022824.dom 4-6 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number MM AQ-3 Prior to issuance of the first The property owner/developer shall submit a site and operations plan for this facility Planning & Building building permit associated showing the location and configuration of the on -site cast financial and dining services Department, Planning with a cumulative total of in conformance with The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. Services Division over 10,000 square feet of theme park development in The property owner/developer shall provide cast financial and dining services within the Southeast District or the Southeast District or Theme Park East Overlay and the Theme Park District to Theme Park East Overlay, accommodate cast members. whichever occurs first The property owner/developer shall continue to provide cast financial and dining Prior to final building and services in conformance with The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. zoning inspections associated with a cumulative total of over 10,000 square feet of theme park development in the Southeast District or Theme Park East Overlay Ongoing during project operation MM AQ-4 Ongoing during project The following will be achieved: (1) the 1.5 AVR target for all cast and (2) the average Public Works operation length of the out -of -area guest stay of 1.72 days, or a demonstration that the SCAG Department, Traffic VMT reduction targets have been met through other means. and Transportation Division; South Coast Air Quality Management District Ongoing during (SCAQMD) MM AQ-5 The following measures will be followed by the property owner/developer to reduce Planning & Building construction air quality impacts: Department, Building a. Normal wetting procedures (at least twice daily) or other dust palliative Division; Public Works Department, measures shall be followed during earth -moving operations to minimize fugitive Development Services dust emissions, in compliance with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code Division including application of chemical soil stabilizers to exposed soils after grading is completed and replacing ground cover in disturbed areas as quickly as practicable. R:1Projects%WD113WD10004001Environmental DocumentatiunTinal SEIRTinal_SEIR-022824.docx 4-7 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Number Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion b. For projects where there is excavation for subterranean facilities (such as parking) on -site haul roads shall be watered at least every two hours or the on - site haul roads shall be paved. c. Enclosing, covering, watering twice daily, or applying approved soil binders, according to manufacturer's specification, to exposed piles. d. Roadways adjacent to the project shall be swept and cleared of any spilled export material at least twice a day to assist in minimizing fugitive dust; and haul routes shall be cleared as needed if spills of material exported from the project site occur. e. Where practicable, heavy duty construction equipment shall be kept onsite when not in operation to minimize exhaust emissions associated with vehicles repetitiously entering and exiting the project site. f. Trucks importing or exporting soil material and/or debris shall either be covered prior to entering public streets or shall comply with the vehicle freeboard requirements of Section 23114 of the California Vehicle Code for both public and private roads. This California Vehicle Code section stipulates that the load, where it contacts the sides, front and back of the cargo container area, remain six inches from the upper edge of the container area, and that the load does not extend, at its peak, above any part of the upper edge of the cargo container area. g. Taking preventive measures to ensure that trucks do not carry dirt on tires onto public streets, including treating onsite roads and staging areas. h. Preventing trucks from idling for longer than 2 minutes. i. Manually irrigate or activate irrigation systems necessary to water and maintain the vegetation as soon as planting is completed. j. Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces to 15 miles per hour or less. k. Suspend all grading operations when wind speeds (as instantaneous gust) exceed 25 miles per hour and during second stage smog alerts. 1. Comply with the SCAQMD Rule 402, which states that no dust impacts offsite are sufficient to be called a nuisance, and SCAQMD Rule 403, which restricts visible emissions from construction. in. Use low emission mobile construction equipment (e.g., tractors, scrapers, dozers, etc.) where practicable. n. Utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean -fuel generators rather than temporary power generators, where practicable. R:1ProjectslWDI13WD10004001Envimnmental DommentationTinel SEIRTinal_SEIR-022824.do 4-8 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number o. Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them properly tuned. p. Use low sulfur fuel for equipment, to the extent practicable. q. Should demolition, grading, or, excavation activities of two or more projects within any portion of the Project site occur concurrently, air quality monitoring shall be conducted each day that demolition and grading/excavation activities occur concurrently; monitoring shall be conducted in accordance with SCAQMD Rule 403 and ensure that PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations shall not exceed the established regulatory limit of 50 micrograms per cubic meter. MM AQ-6 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export Plans. The Public Works grading permit (for plans shall include identification of offsite locations for material export from the Department, Traffic Import/Export Plan) and project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include and Transportation prior to issuance of recycling of materials onsite, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in the Division demolition permit (for vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move Demolition Plan) it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if not all can be reused on the project site. MM AQ-7 Ongoing during The property owner/developer shall implement the following to limit emissions from Planning & Building construction architectural coatings and asphalt usage: Department, Building a. Use nonsolvent-based coatings on buildings, wherever appropriate. Division b. Use solvent -based coatings, where they are necessary, in ways that minimize solvent emissions. c. Encourage use of high -solid or water -based coatings. _ MM AQ-8 Prior to issuance of building All public day -use parking facilities, not including hotel, hotel accessory uses or cast Public Works permits for each of the east parking facilities, will have a crew of cast members, based on parking predictions, on Department, Traffic and west public parking each lot or facility level, to assist speed parking procedures. In addition, the East and and Transportation structures and any parking West public parking structures and any parking structure in the Southeast District will Division structure in the Southeast incorporate the following design features on each facility level, to assist speed parking District; ongoing during procedures: project operation 1. Signage designed to enhance smooth traffic flows and reduce traffic flows on each facility level. 2. Speed ramps which will take cars directly to the level that has available spaces, thus eliminating circulation movement and time involved with hunting for a space. The speed parking striping and procedures currently used at the R.lProjeclslWDI13WD10004001Environmental DocumentationTinal SEIR%Fina1_SEIR-022824.dau 4-9 DisneylandFonaard Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number Disneyland theme park parking lot will be adapted to use within the parking structures and will be designed to safely park 60 cars per minute. (Refer to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan.) 3. Ceiling clearances and lateral clearances, an open well design, and enhanced lighting levels will eliminate the enclosed feeling of a standard garage, which tends to slow drivers. MM AQ-9 Ongoing during project The property owner/developer will implement a comprehensive and aggressive Public Works operation Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for all project employees. Department, Traffic and Transportation Division MM AQ-10 Prior to the issuance of each The property owner/developer shall implement, and demonstrate to the City, that Planning & Building building permit project design will incorporate the following energy -saving features. This energy Department, Building savings will also contribute to reduced operation -related air quality impacts. These Division and Planning measures may include, but are not limited to the following: Services Division; a. Improve thermal integrity of structures and reduced thermal load through use of automated time clocks or occupant sensors. b. Incorporate efficient heating and other appliances. c. Incorporate energy conservation measures in site orientation and in building design, such as appropriate passive solar design and proper sealing of buildings. d. Use water -wise landscaping wherever feasible to reduce energy used in pumping and transporting water. e. To the extent feasible, provide daycare opportunities for employees or participate in a joint development daycare center. f. Install facilities for electric vehicle recharging, unless it is demonstrated that the technology for these facilities or availability of the equipment current at the time makes this installation infeasible. MM AQ-11 Prior to issuance of each The public parking facilities, which may be used for theme park guest parking, shall Planning & Building building permit for public be designed in accordance with the speed parking procedures set forth The Disneyland Department, Planning day -use parking facilities Resort Specific Plan and the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan which will assist in Services Division reducing vehicular fuel from idling engines. R:1P ejectslWDI13WDI0004001Envimnmental DocumentationTinal SEIRTinal_SEIR-022824.d— 4-10 DisneylandFonvard Final Subsequent E!R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number MM AQ-12 Prior to issuance of the first The property owner/developer shall submit a human health risk assessment (HRA) for Planning & Building building permit any proposed sensitive land uses (according to SCAQMD standards at that time) to be Department, Planning located within 500 feet of the near edge of the I-5 freeway unless it is demonstrated Services Division that the health risks have been determined to be acceptable according to the standards of the SCAQMD at the time of building permit application. MM AQ-13 During construction For all offroad engines that are diesel and above 50 brake horsepower, the contractor Planning & Building activities shall use engines that comply with USEPA Tier 4 offroad engine standards. Department, Building Division; Public Works Department, I Development Services Division MM AQ-14 Prior to issuance of a If two or more dust -generating construction projects, which collectively will disturb 15 Planning & Building grading permit acres or more and which have demolition, excavation, or grading activity scheduled to Department, Building occur concurrently, a Localized Significance Threshold analysis shall be prepared. If Division; Public Works the LST analysis determines that the established Localized Significance Thresholds for Department, NOx, PM2.5, or PM10 would be exceeded, then modifications to construction Development Services equipment profiles, modifications to construction schedules, or additional pollution Division reduction measures shall be implemented. PDF AQ-1 Ongoing during project The project has been designed to reduce dependence on the private automobile, which Planning & Building operation will reduce and avoid many of the traffic -related emissions associated with the existing Department, Planning Disneyland theme park and Disney California Adventure Park, as well as those Services Division normally associated with hotels and day -use only special event activities and those associated with development of theme park uses in the Southeast District or Theme Park East Overlay. Guests will be encouraged to park their cars and leave them for the duration of their visits, thus eliminating the trips to restaurants and sightseeing, or entertainment attractions normally associated with vacation stays. Marketing efforts in Southern California will promote the Disneyland Resort as a mini -vacation site for Southland residents. PDF AQ-2 Ongoing during project A wide range of entertainment, lodging, retail and restaurant attractions will be located Planning & Building operations within the project area and will be linked by an electrically powered monorail system, Department, Planning pedestrian ways/guest transportation system to transport visitors from parking facilities Services Division to The Disneyland Resort, and/or pedestrian bridges, walkways and promenades. Convenient walkway access within the Theme Park District, the Southeast District and the Theme Park East Overlay and adjacent uses, such as the City of Anaheim Convention Center, will also facilitate pedestrian trips by non -project guests who will R:1Projects\WDI13WD10004001Environmental DocumentaticnTinal SEIR%Final_8EIR-022824.docx 4-1 t DisneylandForward Final Subsequent E1R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number remain within the project area rather than use automobiles to travel to restaurants and entertainment outside of the area. PDF AQ-3 Ongoing during project In accordance with transportation and circulation mitigation measures, The Disneyland Planning & Building operations Resort traffic will be accommodated, and existing traffic conditions and circulation Department, Planning patterns will be improved through implementation of the identified transportation and Services Division; parking features, including parking facilities, monorail and pedestrian way/guest Public Works transportation systems and convenient access to parking facilities from the freeway. Department, Traffic and Transportation _ Division PDF AQ-4 Prior to issuance of building The Disneyland Resort Project will include a special drop-off area on Harbor Planning & Building permits for the East Parking Boulevard north of Disney Way, or internal or adjacent to the East Parking Area Department, Planning Facility and ongoing during Parking Structure and/or adjacent ARSP Parking Overlay, or other accessible location, Services Division; project operations for shuttle buses to help encourage use of buses by area visitors. Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division SR AQ-1 Prior to issuance of the first The property owner/developer shall provide written evidence of compliance to the Planning & Building grading or building permit, Planning & Building Director or their designee that all construction activities shall Department, Building whichever occurs first comply with SCAQNID Rules 402 and 403, which shall assist in reducing short term Division; Public Works air pollutant emissions. SCAQMD Rule 402 requires that air pollutant emissions not Department, be a nuisance off site. SCAQMD Rule 403 (Tables 1, 2, and 3 of Rule 403) requires Development Services that fugitive dust be controlled with the best available control measures so that the Division presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source. This requirement shall be included as notes on the contractor specifications. SR AQ-2 Prior to issuance of building The property owner/developer shall submit evidence that low emission paints and Planning & Building permits coatings are utilized in the design and construction of all buildings in compliance with Department, Building SCAQMD regulations, including SCAQNID Rule 1113. This information shall be Division denoted on the project plans and specifications. The property owner/developer shall also submit an architectural coating schedule and calculations demonstrating that VOC emissions from architectural coating operations would not exceed 75 pounds per day averaged over biweekly periods. The calculations shall show, for each coating, the surface area to be coated, gallons (or liters) of coating per unit surface area, and VOC R:1Projects1WD113WO10004001Environmental DommentationlFinal SEIR1FInal_SEIR-022824.doa 4-12 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature TimingResponsible Measure for Monitoring Completion Number content per gallon (or liter). The property owner/developer shall also implement the following to limit emissions from architectural coatings and asphalt usage: a. Use nonsolvent-based coatings on buildings, wherever appropriate; b. Use solvent based coatings, where they are necessary. Biological Resources MM BIO-1 Prior to the issuance of a A letter detailing the proposed schedule for vegetation removal and building Planning & Building demolition permit, grading demolition activities shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department, Department, Planning permit, or building permit, verifying that removal shall take place between August 1 and January 31 to avoid the Services Division whichever occurs first bird nesting season. If this is not feasible, the property owner/developer shall implement MM BIO-2. MM BIO-2 Prior to the issuance of a A pre -construction nesting bird survey of structures to be demolished and/or vegetation Planning & Building demolition permit, grading to be removed shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist no more than three days prior Department, Planning permit or building permit, to such work occurring. If the Biologist does not find any active nests within or Services Division whichever occurs first, and immediately adjacent to the impact area, the vegetation clearing/construction work if Project demolition and/or shall be allowed to proceed. The pre -construction nesting bird survey shall be updated vegetation clearing must following any work stoppage of two weeks or longer. occur during the bird nesting season (February 1— If an active nest of a bird species protected under California Fish and Game Code or July 31) the Migratory Bird Treaty Act is identified within or immediately adjacent to the construction area, and the Biologist determines that the nest may be impacted or breeding activities substantially disrupted, the Biologist shall delineate an appropriate no -impact buffer zone (at a minimum of 25 feet) around the nest depending on the sensitivity of the species and the nature of the construction activity. All nests and associated buffers shall be mapped on the construction plans. The active nest shall be protected until nesting activity has ended. The following restrictions to clearing and/or construction activities shall be required until nest(s) are no longer active, as determined by a qualified Biologist: (1) clearing limits shall be established within a buffer around any occupied nest (the buffer shall be 25-100 feet for nesting birds and 300- to 500- feet for nesting raptors), unless otherwise determined by a qualified Biologist; and (2) access shall be restricted within the buffer of any active nest, unless otherwise determined by a qualified Biologist. Encroachment into the buffer area around a known nest shall only be allowed if the Biologist determines that the proposed activity would not disturb the nest occupants. Once the qualified Biologist has determined that fledglings have left the nest, there is no evidence of a second nesting attempt, or the nest has failed, construction can proceed within the buffer zone. R:1Projects1WD113WD10004001Environmental DommentationTinal SEI Winal SEIR-022824.docx 4-13 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Responsible for Design Feature Timing Measure Monitoring Completion Number Cultural Resources MM CUL-1 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified Public Works grading permit archaeologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented: Department; a. The archaeologist must be present at the pre -grading conference in order to Development Services Division establish procedures for archaeological monitoring, as well as for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of artifacts if potentially significant artifacts are uncovered. Specific monitoring procedures will be established based on review of site specific conditions, including presence of native soils, anticipated construction activities, and nature of ground disturbance including depth of excavation. If artifacts are uncovered and determined to be significant, the archaeological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage. b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process shall be donated to an appropriate educational or research institution. c. Any archaeological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified archaeologist. If any artifacts are discovered during grading operations when the archaeological monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area. d. A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the specimens shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department within ninety days. MM CUL-2 For properties within the For properties that contain a structure over 45 years old, property owners/developers Planning &Building ARSP, prior to approval of shall submit to the Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division, Department, Planning building, grading or documentation to verify the presence/absence of historic resources. On properties Services Division demolition permits, where resources are identified, such documentation in accordance with NABS whichever occurs first standards shall provide a detailed mitigation plan, including a monitoring program and recovery and/or in situ preservation plan, based on the recommendations of a qualified specialist. R:IProjectslWD113WD10004001Environmental DocumentationTinal SEIRT1nal_SEIR-022824.docx 4-14 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number MM CUL-3 Prior to the issuance of The property owner/developer shall be responsible for implementing the following and Planning & Building grading, demolition or submitting the required documentation to the Planning and Building Department, Department, Planning building permits, whichever Planning Services Division: If an individual development project within the potential Services Division occurs first Disneyland Theme Park Historic District proposes to substantially alter or demolish a contributing feature to the potential Disneyland Theme Park Historic District as identified in the Historic Resources Technical Report attached as Appendix E-2 to Subsequent EIR No. 352, that contributing feature shall be documented in the outline format as specified in the HABS History Guidelines, and photographed according to the HABS Photography Guidelines, . The documentation shall be prepared by a historian or architectural historian who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Standards in the relevant discipline. Digital copies of the documentation shall be submitted to the Anaheim Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division for storage with Heritage Services, and housed in the Walt Disney Company archives. MM CUL-4 Prior to the issuance of The property owner/developer shall be responsible for implementing the following Planning &Building grading, demolition or and submitting the required documentation to the Planning and Building Department, Department, Planning building permits, whichever Planning Services Division: If any of the individually designated or potentially eligible Services Division occurs first features or buildings within the theme park, as identified in the Historic Resources Technical Report attached as Appendix E-2 to Subsequent EIR No. 352, are proposed for substantial alteration or demolition, that feature or building shall be documented individually in the outline format as specified in the HABS History Guidelines, and photographed according to the HABS Photography Guidelines. The documentation shall be prepared by a historian or architectural historian who meets the Secretary of the Interior's Historic Preservation Professional Standards in the relevant discipline. Digital copies of the documentation shall be submitted to the Anaheim Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division for storage with the Heritage Services Division, and housed in the Walt Disney Company archives. SR CUL-I Before and during If human remains are discovered on -site, no further disturbance shall occur until the Planning & Building construction County Coroner has made a determination of origin, and disposition pursuant to Department, Planning California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Services Division Code Section 7050.5 has occurred. R:1ProjectslWDI13WD10004001Environmental DocumentationlFinal SEIR1Final_SEIR-022824.do 4-15 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Number MM ENE-1 NM ENE-2 MM ENE-3 NM ENE-4 NM ENE-5 Timing Measure Energy Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall submit plans and calculations to demonstrate that building permit the energy efficiency of each building will exceed the Title 24, Part 6, Building Energy Efficiency Standards current at the time of application by at least 10 percent. Prior to submittal of plans Any new system improvements (e.g., substation, line connections), if required, shall for electrical system be constructed in accordance with the City's Electric Rates, Rules and Regulations and improvements Electrical Specifications. Electrical Service Fees and other applicable fees will be assessed in accordance with the then current Electric Rates, Rules and Regulations and Electrical Specifications. Prior to approval of each The Southern California Gas Company has developed several programs which are final building and zoning intended to assist in the selection of most energy -efficient water heaters and furnaces. inspection The property owner/developer shall implement a program, as required, to reduce the demand on natural gas supplies. Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall demonstrate on plans that fuel -efficient models of building permit gas -powered building equipment have been incorporated into the proposed project to the extent feasible. Prior to issuance of a The property owner/developer shall incorporate feasible renewable energy building permit measures into the project. These measures may include but not be limited to useofrenewable biofuels, solar and small wind turbine sources on new and existing facilities and the use of solar powered lighting in parking areas. PDF ENE-1 Ongoing during project The project shall be developed in conformance with The Disneyland Resort Specific development and operation Plan and shall offer a broad diversity of theme park, retail, dining and entertainment experiences which will enhance the destination resort character of The Disneyland Resort. As a result, many visitors will extend their length of stay; thus, incremental vehicular trips to and from the site are expected to be reduced. R:1Projects1WD113VVD1000400\Environmental DocumentationTinal SEIRTinal SEIR-022824.d - ocx 4-16 DisneylandFonvard Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Responsible for Monitoring Planning & Building Department, Building Division; Utilities Department, Resource Efficiency Section Planning & Building Department, Building Division; Utilities Department, Electric Services Division Utilities Department, Resource Efficiency Section Planning & Building Department, Building Division; Utilities Department, Resource Efficiency Section Planning & Building Department, Building Division; Utilities Department, Resource Efficiency Section Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division Completion DisneylandFonaard Final Subsequent E!R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number SR ENE-1 Prior to the issuance of each The property owner/developer shall be required to prepare and submit to the City for Planning & Building building permit review and approval (1) a Landscape Documentation Package and (2) landscape and Department, Planning irrigation plans with appropriate water use calculations in accordance with the Services Division requirements of Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 10.19, Landscape Water Efficiency. SR ENE-2 Prior to the issuance of The property owner/developer shall be required to demonstrate to the Planning Planning & Building building permits Department, Building Division that building plans meet the applicable California Department, Building Green Building Standards. Division Geology MM GEO-1 Prior to approval of each The property owner/developer shall submit to the Public Works Department, Public Works grading plan Development Services Division, for review and approval a thorough soils and Department, geological report for the area to be graded, based on proposed grading and prepared by Development Services an engineering geologist and geotechnical engineer. The report shall comply with Title Division 17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. MM GEO-2 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department, Planning & Building building permit Building Division for review and approval, detailed foundation design information for Department, Building the subject building(s), prepared by a civil engineer, based on recommendations by a Division geotechnical engineer. MM GEO-3 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall submit a report prepared by a geotechnical Planning & Building _ foundation permit engineer to the Planning and Building Department, Building Division for review and Department, Building approval, which shall investigate the subject foundation excavations to determine if Division soft layers are present immediately beneath the footing site and to ensure that compressibility does not underlie the footing. MM GEO-4 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Planning and Building Planning & Building building permit Department, Building Division for review and approval showing that the proposed Department, Building structure has been analyzed for earthquake loading and designed according to the Division most recent seismic standards in the California Building Code adopted by the City of Anaheim. MM GEO-5 Prior to issuance of building The property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department, Planning & Building or grading permits Building Division geologic and geotechnical investigations in areas of potential Department, Building seismic or geologic hazards and provide a note on plans that all grading operations Division shall be conducted in conformance with the recommendations contained in the applicable geotechnical investigation. R:1ProjectslVMI13WD10004001Envimnmental DocumentationTinal SEIR%Final_SEIR-022824.docx 4-17 Disney/andFonmard Final Subsequent E1R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number MM GEO-6 Ongoing during grading The property owner/developer shall implement standard practices for all applicable Planning & Building activities codes and ordinances to prevent erosion to the satisfaction of the Planning and Building Department, Building Department, Building Division. Division MM GEO-7 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified Public Works grading permit paleontologist meeting the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP) standards that Department, has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented: Development Services a. The paleontologist must be present at the pre -grading conference in order to Division establish procedures for paleontological monitoring, as well as for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of fossils if potentially significant paleontological resources are uncovered. If fossils are uncovered and found to be significant, the paleontological monitor shall administer appropriate actions based on SVP protocols'. b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process shall be reposited in an appropriate educational or research institution. Preparation, storage and curation shall be funded by the property owner/developer. c. Any paleontological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified paleontologist. If any fossils are discovered during grading operations when the paleontological monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the discovery by a buffer of at least 50 feet. Construction shall not resume until the paleontological monitor has given the order to proceed in that location once a determination on the significance of the fossil discovery has been made. d. A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the specimens shall be submitted. Upon completion of the grading, the paleontologist shall notify the City as to when the final report will be submitted. SR GEO-1 Ongoing during grading All grading operations will be conducted in conformance with the Anaheim Municipal Public Works activities Code, Title 17, Land Development and Resources, and the most recent version of the Department, California Building Code. Development Services 1 Division Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (SVP), Guidelines from the Ethics Education Committee for Collecting, Documenting and Curating Fossils (last updated 2021). hftps://vertpaleo.org/Wp—content/uploads/2021/01/Guidelines-from-the-Ethics-Education-Commiftee.pdf (accessed August 18, 2023). R:1ProjectslWD113WDI0004001Envimnmental DocumentationTinal SEIRTinal_SEIR-022824.dou 4-18 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Responsible for Timing Measure Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number Greenhouse Gas Emissions As discussed in Draft Subsequent EIR No. 352, Section 5.7, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, incorporates SRs, MMs, and PDFs from Section 5.1, Air Quality; Section 5.5, Energy; Section 5.9, Hydrology and Water Quality; Section 5.14, Transportation; and Section 5.16, Utilities and Service Systems. Hazards and Hazardous Materials MM HAZ-1 Prior to any relocation of The transformers shall be tested by the property owner/developer for PCBs. Utilities Department, transformers that may Electric Services contain PCBs which are being moved or relocated as part of project development MM HAZ-2 Ongoing during demolition In the event that hazardous waste, including asbestos, is discovered during site Fire Department, and construction preparation or construction, the property owner/developer shall ensure that the Environmental identified hazardous waste and/or hazardous material are handled and disposed of in Protection Section the manner specified by the State of California Hazardous Substances Control Law (Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5), according to the requirements of the California Administrative Code, Title 30, Chapter 22. MM HAZ-3 Prior to approval of a The property owner/developer shall submit a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Fire Department, grading plan or issuance of (ESA) prepared pursuant to current ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Environmental a demolition permit, Assessments to identify potential threats to human health and the environment for Protection Section; whichever occurs first review by the City. If possible hazardous materials are identified during the site Orange County Health assessments, the appropriate response/remedial measures will be implemented in Care Agency accordance with the requirements of the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) and/or the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), as appropriate. The ESA shall detail procedures that shall be taken if a previously unknown underground storage tank (UST) or other unknown hazardous materials or waste is discovered onsite. The ESA shall outline where hazardous materials may be found, types of hazardous materials anticipated, how to screen for them, and what to do in the event they are identified. The ESA shall identify the party responsible for the screening, and training requirements for those responsible for undertaking the screening effort. The ESA shall specify requirements for reporting, handling, staging, disposal, and recordkeeping. The ESA shall also identify contingencies in the event that significant contamination is identified that is 1) above regulatory thresholds and 2) cannot be removed/ remediated by proposed construction. R:IProjectslWDl13WD10004001Environmental DocumentationTinal SEIR1Final_SEIR-D22824.docx 4-19 DisneylandForward Final Subseouent E!R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number MM HAZ-4 Prior to issuance of a In areas known or thought to have been previously occupied by underground storage Fire Department, grading or demolition tanks (USTs), or other hazardous materials or waste, and in areas where tank removal Environmental permit, whichever occurs has not been verified prior to excavation or grading; the property owner/developer Protection Section; first shall retain the services of a qualified environmental professional to conduct an Orange County Health investigation for known, or the presence of, cryptic tanks using geophysical methods Care Agency that include the potential use of ground penetrating radar (GPR) or similar technologies to determine no abandoned USTs are present. MM 14AZ-5 Prior to the removal of The property owner/developer shall obtain a permit from the Hazardous Materials Fire Department, underground storage tanks Management section of the Fire Department for removal of such tanks. During Environmental (USTs) removal of the underground storage tank, a representative from the Hazardous Protection Section; Materials Section (RIMS) of the Fire Department shall be onsite to direct soil sampling. Orange County Health Care Agency MM HAZ-6 Ongoing during remediation All remediation activities of surface or subsurface contamination not related to Fire Department, underground storage tanks (USTs), conducted on behalf of the property Environmental owner/developer, shall be overseen by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Protection Section; Board (SARWQCB) and witnessed by Anaheim Fire Department/Hazardous Material Orange County Health Management Section (RIMS). Information on subsurface contamination from an Care Agency underground storage tank shall be provided to the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB) with a copy to Planning & Building. MM HAZ-7 Prior to issuance of each A hazardous building material survey shall be conducted to verify the absence of Fire Department, demolition permit hazardous building materials and, if needed, future abatement by a California -licensed Environmental contractor, and/or removal and disposal in accordance with federal, state, and local Protection Section; transportation and disposal regulations. Orange County Health Care Agency SR HAZ-1 Ongoing during Project All construction activities, including demolition and renovation of the existing Fire Department, construction facilities and installation of the new facilities, shall be performed in compliance with Environmental all CalOSHA standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 8) to protect worker Protection Section; health and safety. Orange County Health _ Ongoing during Project Care Agency SR HAZ-2 The removal and disposal of any lead -based paint (LBP) encountered on site during Fire Department, implementation Project implementation shall be performed by an LBP Abatement Contractor that is Environmental licensed and registered in California pursuant to California Code of Regulations Protection Section; Title 17. Orange County Health Care Agency R:1Projects1WD113WD10004001Environmental DocumentationlFinal SEIR1Final_SEIR-022824.doa 4-20 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Timing Number Measure SR HAZ-3 Ongoing during Project Activities at the Project Site shall comply with existing federal, State, and local construction and operations regulations regarding hazardous material use, storage, disposal, and transport. All on - site generated waste that meets hazardous waste criteria shall be stored, manifested, transported, and disposed of in accordance with the California Code of Regulations (Title 22) and in a manner to the satisfaction of the local Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA), as applicable. SR HAZ-4 MM HWQ-1 MM HWQ-2 All transport and transfer of hazardous materials shall be performed by a licensed hazardous waste hauler in compliance with all applicable State and federal requirements, including U.S. Department of Transportation regulations under Title 49 (Hazardous Materials Transportation Act) and Title 40, Section 263 (Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) of the Code of Federal Regulations; California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) standards; and Division of Occupational Safety and Healthy (Cal/OSHA) standards. Ongoing during Project All construction activities, including demolition and renovation of the existing construction facilities and installation of the new facilities, shall be performed in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 1403 requiring a survey for and proper abatement of asbestos -containing materials prior to construction. Hydrology and Water Quality Ongoing during Project The property owner/developer shall complywith the Master Drainage and Runoff operations Management Plan (MDRMP) and shall submit updates as required for new grading for review and approval by the City Engineer. Prior to issuance of each - The property owner/developer shall submit landscaping and irrigation plans and an building permit Irrigation Management Program. This landscape plan shall include a maintenance program to control the use of fertilizers and pesticides, and an irrigation system designed to minimize surface runoff and overwatering. Additionally: a. The landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape architect shall submit plans in accordance with Anaheim's Landscape Water Efficiency Ordinance and Guidelines including: L Project Information 2. Maximum Applied Water Use expresses as annual totals. 3. Soil management report or specifications. R:1Projects%WDi13WD10004001Environmental DocumentalionlFinal SEIR1Final SEIR-022824.docx 4-21 DisneylandFonvard Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Responsible for Monitoring Completion Fire Department, Environmental Protection Section; Orange County Health Care Agency Air Quality Management District Public Works Department, Development Services Division Public Utilities, Water Services; Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division DisneylandForward Final Subseauent E1R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Number Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion 4. Landscape design plan. 5. Irrigation design plan. 6. Grading design plan. b. The Irrigation Management Program shall specify methods for monitoring the irrigation system and shall be designed by an irrigation engineer (plans to be submitted in accordance with the Specific Plan). The system shall ensure that irrigation rates do not exceed the infiltration of local soils and that the application of fertilizers and pesticides do not exceed appropriate levels of frequencies. c. The landscape and irrigation plans shall be developed to be consistent with the provisions of the Specific Plan, which require that the Estimated Applied Water Use (EAWU) to be less than the Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) or that the landscape irrigation system include water -conserving features such as low -flow irrigation heads, automatic irrigation scheduling equipment, flow sensing controls, rain sensors, soil moisture sensors, and other water -conserving equipment. In addition, all irrigation systems shall be designed so that they will function properly with reclaimed water, if it should become available. MM HWQ-3 Ongoing during operation of The property owner/developer shall provide for the following: cleaning of all paved Planning & Building the Disneyland Resort areas not maintained by the City of Anaheim including, but not limited to, private Department, Code streets and parking lots on not less than a monthly basis. Using water to clean streets, Enforcement Division parking lots, and other areas shall be allowed on a periodic basis if allowed in the property owner/developer's NPDES permit and allowable based on drought restrictions. Nightly washdown shall be allowed in the theme parks and, where advisable to maintain safe and sanitary working conditions, the back -of -house area, if allowed in the property owner/developer's and City's NPDES permit. Flushing debris, residue, and sediment down the storm drains shall conform to the property owner/developer's NPDES requirements. Property owner/developer agrees that material deposited in City storm drains shall not be in violation of the City's NPDES permit. R:1Projecta1WD113WD10004001Envimnmental DocumentationlFinal SEIRIFinal_SEIR-022824.docx 4-22 DisneylandFonvard Final Subsequent E!R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion Number MM HWQ-4 Prior to each final building The property owner/developer shall submit a Certificate of Substantial Completion, as Planning & Building and zoning inspection (for described in the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, which establishes that the landscape Department, Planning non -Setback Realm Areas); irrigation systems have been installed as specified in the approved landscaping and Services Division prior to acceptance by City irrigation plans. Engineer (for Setback Realm Areas) MM HWQ-5 Ongoing during grading The property owner/developer shall implement standard practices from all applicable Public Works operations codes and ordinances to prevent erosion. Department, Development Services Division MM HWQ-6 Prior to issuance of a The property owner/developer shall obtain coverage under the NPDES Statewide Planning & Building grading permit for sites that Stormwater Permit for General Construction Activities from the State Water Resources Department, Code disturb more than one (1) Control Board. Evidence of attainment shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Enforcement Division acre of soil Department, Building Division. MM HWQ-7 Prior to issuance of each To reduce the project's demand on potable water, the property owner/developer shall Planning & Building building permit install water lines onsite so that reclaimed water may be used for landscape irrigation Department, Planning and other purposes, if and when it becomes available. Services Division MM HWQ-8 Prior to each final building The property owner/developer shall submit a letter from a licensed landscape architect Planning & Building and zoning inspection to the City certifying that the landscape installation and irrigation systems have been Department, Planning installed as specified in the approved landscaping and irrigation plans. Services Division MM HWQ-9 Prior to issuance of building The property owner/developer shall provide written evidence that all storm drain, Public Works permits sewer, and street improvement plans shall be designed and constructed to the Department, satisfaction of the City Engineer. Development Services Division SR HWQ-1 Prior to the issuance of Development projects that will result in soil disturbance of one (1) or more acres of Public Works preliminary or precise land shall comply with the State's Construction General Permit by filing a Notice of Department, grading permits Intent (NOI) with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and Development Services implementing a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The property Division owner/developer shall provide the City Engineer with evidence that an NOI has been filed with the SWRCB by providing a copy of the NOI invoice and the assigned Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) No. for the project. The SWPPP shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) designed with a goal of preventing a net sediment load increase in storm water discharges relative to preconstruction levels and shall prohibit during the construction period discharges of storm water or non -storm water at levels which would cause or contribute to an exceedance of applicable water quality standards contained in the Basin Plan. The BMPs shall address erosion control, sediment control, R:1Projects1WD113WD10004001Environmental DocumentationlFinal SEIR1Final_SEIR-022824.dou 4-23 DisneylandFonvard Final Subsequent E1R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number wind erosion control, tracking control, non -storm water management and waste management and materials pollution control during all phases of construction, including a sampling and analysis plan for sediment and non -visible storm water pollutants. The property owner/developer shall be responsible for proper implementation of the SWPPP. SR 14WQ-2 Prior to issuance of the The property owner/developer shall prepare Water Quality Management Plans Public Works precise grading permit (WQMPs) for review and approval by the Public Works, Development Services. The Department, WQMP shall identify permanent site design, source control and treatment control Best Development Services Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on the site to control predictable Division pollutant runoff. The WQMP shall also describe the long-term operation and maintenance requirements for the treatment control BMPs and the mechanism for funding the BMPs. The WQMP shall be recorded against the property to ensure long- term compliance. SR HWQ-3 Prior to issuance of the first The property owner/developer shall pay the Storm Drain Impact Fees which would go Public Works building permit for Disney toward future storm drain improvements within The Anaheim Resort area and South Department, ARSP Properties Central City area. Development Services Division SR HWQ-4 Ongoing during Project Chapter 10.09 of the Anaheim Municipal Code is the City's NPDES Ordinance, which Planning & Building construction and operations provides regulations to comply with the CWA, the California Porter -Cologne Water Department, Code Quality Control Act, and the City's NPDES permit. This ordinance prohibits the Enforcement Division discharge of specific pollutants into the storm water; regulates illicit connections to the storm drain system; requires development projects to implement permanent BMPs on individual sites to reduce pollutants in the storm water; and requires local discharge permits for non -storm water discharges into the storm drain system. SR HWQ-5 Prior to issuance of grading The property owner/developer of individual developments shall provide written proof Public Works permit to the Public Works Department, Development Services Division of a water quality Department, certification and/or waste discharge requirement (WDR) as well as a plan for Development Services compliance with the discharge prohibitions, TMDLs, and various programs of the Division Santa Ana RWQCB. The Santa Ana RWQCB implements the Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin through the issuance of individual WDRs; discharge prohibitions; water quality certifications; programs for salt management, non -point sources, and storm water; and monitoring and regulatory enforcement actions, as necessary. R:1ProjectslWDI13WD10004001Environmental DocumentationlFinal SEIR1Final_SEIR-022824.do 4-24 DisneylandForward Final Subseauent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Responsible for Timing Measure Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number Land Use and Planning MM LU-1 Prior to issuance of each Building plans shall be submitted by the property owner/developer and will be Planning & Building building permit reviewed for consistency with The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and The Anaheim Department, Planning Resort Specific Plan. Services Division MM LU-2 Prior to issuance of each The proposed project shall be implemented based on the guidelines and standards in Planning & Building building permit The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, which includes zoning and development Department, Planning standards, design guidelines, and a Public Facilities Plan. All development proposals Services Division within The Disneyland Resort must be consistent with The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, and the City of Anaheim General Plan. MM LU-3 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall submit plans detailing the setbacks for the parking Planning & Building building permit for parking structures and landscaping plans which minimize compatibility impacts of the parking Department, Planning facilities facilities on surrounding areas, consistent with The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Services Division and the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan. PDF LU-1 Prior to approval of issuance The property owner/developer shall submit documentation that project design features Planning & Building of each building permit are in compliance with all building setbacks, height standards, landscaping Department, Planning requirements, and design guidelines as specified in The Disneyland Resort Specific Services Division Plan and the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan. Noise MM NOI-1 Ongoing during project The property owner/developer shall obtain pyrotechnic permits on an annual basis. Fire Department; operation Material additions or modifications to firework shoots shall require a separate permit. MM NOI-2 Ongoing during project Lower noise -producing fireworks displays will be used at Disney California Adventure Fire Department; operations to minimize noise from 11:00 p.m. fireworks shows to meet the noise levels in the City Planning & Building of Anaheim Sound Pressure Level Ordinance. Department, Code Enforcement Division MM NOI-3 Ongoing during project No aerial fireworks show shall be allowed west of Disneyland Drive in the expanded Fire Department; operations and prior to the Theme Park District, the Southeast District or the ARSP Theme Park Overlays. Prior Planning & Building commencement of any show to the commencement of any show in these areas that includes fireworks that are non- Department, Code west of Disneyland Drive in explosive (i.e., stage pyrotechnics) or explosive fireworks with an explosion point at Enforcement Division the expanded Theme Park an elevation less 50 feet (e.g., Fantasmic!), the property owner/developer shall present District, the Southeast a noise study to the Planning and Building Department to demonstrate that noise levels District or the ARSP Theme from the fireworks would meet the City's 60 dBA Sound Pressure Levels standard at Park Overlays areas that the property line, and would not create a noise increase greater than 5 dBA over includes fireworks that are R:1ProjectslWDR3WD10004001Environmental Documenta8on\Final SEIRTinal_SEIR-022824.dam 4-25 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent ElR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number non -explosive (i.e., stage existing ambient noise at the nearest noise sensitive receptor, whichever is more pyrotechnics) or explosive restrictive. fireworks with an explosion point at an elevation less 50 feet (e.g., Fantasmic!) MM NOI-4 Prior to issuance of a Plans submitted for the location of the amphitheater will document that the facility is Planning & Building building permit for an no closer than 2,000 feet from the nearest existing residence. The design and Department, Planning amphitheater orientation of the amphitheater will be reviewed by a certified acoustical engineer; the Services Division property owner/developer shall submit a report, for review and approval by the City, to ensure that noise from the amphitheater does not exceed the noise levels established by the City of Anaheim Sound Pressure Level Ordinance. MM NOI-5 Prior to final building and A Noise Monitoring Program prepared by a certified acoustical engineer shall be Planning & Building zoning inspection for the submitted for review and approval. The property owner/developer shall submit the Department, Planning amphitheater and within 9 results of the Noise Monitoring Program conducted by a certified acoustical engineer Services Division months of commencement to ensure that there are not violations of the Sound Pressure Level Ordinance from of amphitheater operations amphitheater operations outside the Disneyland Resort. If noise in excess of the Sound Pressure Level Ordinance is detected, the property owner/developer shall modify operations within three days to bring the amphitheater into conformance with the Sound Pressure Level Ordinance. MM NOI-6 Ongoing during Engine noise from sweeping equipment used in the parking facilities and any hotel Planning & Building construction and project parking facilities adjacent to residential areas shall be muffled. Sweeping operations in Department, Building operations the parking facilities and private on -site roadways shall be performed utilizing Division; Public Works sweeping/scrubbing equipment which operate at a level measured not greater than 60 Department, dBA at the nearest adjacent property line. Development Services Division MM NOI-7 Prior to issuance of each For structures that are adjacent to residential areas or other sensitive uses, the property Planning & Building building permit to be owner/developer shall present plans and calculations to the Planning and Building Department, Building implemented prior to final Department to demonstrate that noise levels from mechanical ventilation units, loading Division and Planning building and zoning docks, trash compactors, and other proposed on -site noise sources are designed to meet Services Division inspections the City's 60 DBA Sound Pressure Levels standard at the property line, and not create a noise increase greater than 3 dBA over existing ambient noise at the nearest noise sensitive receptor, whichever is more restrictive. R.lProjectslWDI\3WD10004001Envimnmental DocumentationlFina[ SEIR%Final_SEIR-022824.dom 4-26 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number Ongoing during The property owner/developer shall ensure that all internal combustion engines on NM NOI-8 Planning & Building construction construction equipment and trucks are fitted with properly maintained mufflers. Department, Building Division; Public Works Department, Development Services Division MM NOI-9 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall submit a noise study prepared by a certified Planning & Building building permit acoustical engineer to the satisfaction of the Building Official identifying whether Department, Building noise attenuation is required and defining the attenuation measures and specific Division and Planning performance requirements, if warranted, to comply with the California Building Code Services Division and Sound Pressure Level Ordinance. Ultimate noise attenuation requirements, if any, shall depend on the final location of such buildings and noise -sensitive uses inside and surrounding the buildings. Attenuation measures, such as but not limited to acoustic sound barriers, shall be implemented by the property owner/developer prior to final building and zoning inspections. NM NOI-10 Prior to issuance of each A note shall be provided on building plans indicating that during construction, the Planning & Building building permit for property owner/developer shall install and maintain specially designed construction Department, Building construction within 75 feet barriers between the project perimeter and the sensitive receptor. The construction Division and Planning of noise sensitive receptors sound barriers shall be a minimum height of 8 feet with a minimum surface weight of Services Division 1.25 pounds per square foot or a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 25. The structure shall be a continuous barrier. Gates and other entry doors shall be constructed with suitable mullions, astragals, seals, or other design techniques to minimize sound leakage when in the closed position. Access doors should be self closing where feasible. Vision ports are permissible providing they are filled with an acceptable solid vision product. MM NOI-I I Ongoing during Pressure washing operations for purposes of building repair and maintenance due to Planning & Building construction and project graffiti or other aesthetical considerations and in areas along the property line or Department, Code operation accessible by the public shall be limited to daytime hours of operation between 7:00 Enforcement Division AM and 8:00 PM. R:1ProjectslVMI\3WDI0004001Emimnmental DocumentationTinal SEIRTinal_SEIR-022824.docx 4-27 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number MM NOI-12 Ongoing during Property owners/developers shall pay for all reasonable costs associated with noise Planning & Building construction monitoring which shall include monitoring conducted by a certified acoustical engineer Department, Planning under the direction of the Planning and Building Department four times a year on a Services Division random basis to ensure that outdoor construction -related sound levels at any point on the exterior project boundary property line do not exceed 60 dBA between the hours of 7:00 PM and 7:00 AM of the following day where outside construction is occurring. If a complaint is received by the City, additional noise monitoring shall be conducted at the discretion of the City. If the monitoring finds that the 60 dBA threshold is being exceeded, construction activities will be modified immediately to bring the sound level below the 60 dBA requirement, with additional follow-up monitoring conducted to confirm compliance. MM NOI-13 Prior to issuance of each A note shall be provided on plans indicating that there shall be no operation of clam Planning & Building building permit shovel drops or vibratory rollers within 25 feet of any existing home. Department, Building Division MM NOI-14 Prior to issuance of each If pile driving and blasting is anticipated during construction, a noise and vibration Planning & Building building permit on Disney analysis must be prepared and submitted to the Planning and Building Department to Department, Building ARSP Properties assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities, Division including site design features such as setbacks and trenches. MM NOI-15 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall present area development plans if part of a new Planning & Building building permit and to be theme park land or building plans if part of one theme park attraction to the Planning Department, Planning implemented prior to final and Building Department to demonstrate any development of theme park uses in the Services Division building and zoning expanded Theme Park District (west of Disneyland Drive), the Southeast District, or inspections the ARSP Theme Park Overlays includes 30-foot-tall buildings or structures between the property line near residential or other noise sensitive land uses and the proposed theme park land or theme park attraction. If a noise barrier is provided, such as a ride fagade, the material used shall have a minimum surface weight of 1.25 pounds per square foot or a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 25. MM NOI-16 Ongoing during project The property owner/developer shall pay all reasonable costs associated with noise Planning & Building operations monitoring which shall include monitoring conducted by a certified acoustical Department, Planning consultant or engineer under the direction of the Planning Department to ensure that Services Division The Disneyland Resort ongoing operations do not exceed 60 dBA at any point on the property line between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. of the following day. If the monitoring finds that the 60 dBA threshold is being exceeded, modifications to the ongoing operations, such as adjustments to volume at the source or orientation of speakers, shall be commenced immediately to bring the sound level below the 60 dBA R:\Projects%WDI13WD10004001Environmental DocumentationTinal SEIMFinal_SEIR-022824.dom 4-28 DisneylandForward Final Subseauent ElR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number requirement with additional follow-up monitoring conducted to confirm compliance. Monitoring shall be conducted as follows: (a) Ongoing: Semi-annually on a random basis for a three (3) day period. (b) During the first five (5) years of operation of theme park uses in the expanded Theme Park District west of Disneyland Drive, the Southeast District, and/or the ARSP Theme Park Overlays: Four (4) times a year on a random basis for a three (3) day period. (c) In response to a noise complaint, at the City's discretion: For a three (3) day period at the location of the noise exceedance. MM NOI-17 Prior to the issuance of each A note shall be provided on the plans stating that ongoing during construction, the Planning & Building building permit, grading property owner/developer shall designate a noise disturbance coordinator who would Department, Planning permit or demolition permit respond to neighborhood complaints about construction noise by determining the cause Services Division of the noise complaints and requiring implementation of reasonable measures to correct the noise issue. MM NOI-18 Ongoing during The property owner/developer shall locate all stationary noise -generating equipment Planning & Building construction such as air compressors and portable generators a minimum of 75 feet from noise Department, Building sensitive receptors. Division _ MM NOI-19 Ongoing during No impact driven piles shall be allowed in conjunction with the construction of parking Planning & Building construction structures. Department, Building Division MM NOI-20 Prior to issuance of a The property owner/developer will submit plans to the Planning and Building Planning & Building building permit for a Department indicating noise from the parking structure will be reduced by the Department, Planning parking structure provision of convenient access to the parking structure, sound attenuation devices Services Division (louvers and walls), and the use of textured deck surfaces to reduce tire squealing. MM NOI-21 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall present plans to the Planning and Building Planning & Building building permit Department to demonstrate development of theme park uses in the expanded Theme Department, Planning Park District (west of Disneyland Drive), the Southeast District, or the ARSP Theme Services Division Park Overlays shall include installation and maintenance of at least 12-foot-tall noise barriers along the property line to reduce back -of -house noise, such as vehicle pass- bys and truck deliveries with a minimum surface weight of 1.25 pounds per square foot or a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 25. R:1Projects1WD113WD10004001Environmental DocumentationlFinal SEIR%FInal_SEIR-022824.doat 4-29 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number NM NOI-22 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall present a noise study and area development plans Planning & Building building permit and to be if part of a new theme park land or building plans if part of one theme park attraction Department, Planning implemented prior to final in the expanded Theme Park District (west of Disneyland Drive), the Southeast Services Division building and zoning District, or the ARSP Theme Park Overlays to the Planning and Building Department inspections to demonstrate any Thrill (Indoor) and Family (Indoor) attractions shall be located no less than 200 feet from the center of the ride or attraction to noise -sensitive receptors and shall include a 30-foot-high building or a 30-foot high noise barrier between the attraction and the property line near noise -sensitive receptors, provided a 30-foot-high building or 30-foot-high noise barrier shall not be required if the proposed ride or attraction is located within an enclosed building or structure. The planning of each attraction shall take into account any openings or outdoor areas of the attractions and directionally orient the openings away from noise -sensitive receptors and towards the center of the new theme nark development MM NOI-23 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall present a noise study and area development plans building permit and to be if part of a new theme park land or building plans if part of one theme park attraction implemented prior to final in the expanded Theme Park District (west of Disneyland Drive), the Southeast building and zoning District, or the ARSP Theme Park Overlays to the Planning and Building Department inspections to demonstrate any Thrill (Outdoor), rides taller than 50 feet, Parades and Large Shows shall be located: 1. For 1 st to 3rd Offsite Floor Receptors: No less than 550 feet from the center of the ride to any noise -sensitive receptor and shall include a 30-foot-high building or a 30-foot-high noise barrier between the attraction and the property line near noise -sensitive receptors. 2. For 4th Floor Offsite Receptors and above (i.e., no shielding from 30-foot buildings/barriers): No less than 1100 feet between the center of the ride and any noise -sensitive receptor. If the distance of 1100 feet cannot be met, an indoor rollercoaster shall be considered. If a distance less than 1100 feet is considered with exposure to 4th Floor receptors, the distance to noise -sensitive receptors and layout shall be reviewed by a certified acoustical consultant or engineer prior to finalizing the site plan. In general, the entire full height of the ride shall include a solid barrier shielding it from any noise -sensitive receptors. The material used for the barrier shall have a minimum surface weight of 1.25 pounds per square foot or a minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 25. R:1ProjectslWD113WD10004001Environmental Documenta0onTinni SE1MFina1SEIR-022824.do= 4-30 Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Number MM NOI-24 Timing Measure Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall present a noise study and area development plans building permit and to be if part of a new theme park land or building plans if part of one theme park attraction implemented prior to final in the expanded Theme Park District (west of Disneyland Drive), the Southeast building and zoning District, or the ARSP Theme Park Overlays to the Planning and Building Department inspections to demonstrate any Family (Outdoor), Round and Small Show attractions shall be located at least 400 feet from sensitive receptors and include a 30-foot-high building or a 30-foot-high noise barrier between the attraction and the property line near noise - sensitive receptors. DisneylandForward Final Subsequent E!R No. 352 Responsible for I Completion Monitoring Planning & Building Department, Planning Services Division SR NOI-1 Prior to issuance of grading Contractor specifications shall include a note indicating that noise -generating Planning & Building and/or building permits construction activities which produce a sound pressure level at any point along the Department, Building property line in excess of 60 dBA shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 AM to Division 7:00 PM on any day. This requirement is identified in Section 6.70.010 of the City of Anaheim's Noise Ordinance. Additional work hours may be permitted if deemed necessary by and on approval of the Director of Public Works or Building Official. SR NOI-2 Prior to issuance of building Development shall comply with Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, also Planning & Building permits known as the California Building Standards Code, which establishes building standards Department, Building applicable to all occupancies throughout the state. Title 24 requires that new hotels, Division motels, and multi -family residences be designed to prevent the intrusion of exterior noise so that the interior noise, attributable to exterior sources, shall not exceed the 45 dBA Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) in any habitable room with windows closed. SR NOI-3 Ongoing during Project No commercial use shall produce noise associated with continual loading or unloading Planning & Building construction of heavy trucks at the site between the hours of 8:00 PM and 6:00 AM (Municipal Code Department, Building Section 18.32.130). Division Population and Housing PDF POP-1 Ongoing during project The Walt Disney Company will recruit workers who are already a part of the resident Planning & Building operations work force in the region. Implementation of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan will Department, further efforts in offering employment opportunities at various socioeconomic levels. Planning Services Division R:1Projects1WD113WD10o04001Envimnmental DocumentationTinal SEIR1F1na1_SEIR-022824.do 4-31 DisneylandFonvard Final Subseauent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion Number Public Services Fire MM PS-1 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall pay all applicable fire fees in the amount then in Fire Department building permit for effect and in accordance with the City -adopted Fire Protection Facilities and Paramedic development in the ARSP Services Impact Fee Program (initially established through City Council Resolution Parking and Theme Park No. 95R-73). Alternatively, the City and the Property Owner/Developer may enter into Overlays alternative financing arrangements. MM PS-2 Prior to commencement of Onsite fire hydrants shall be installed and charged, as required, by the property Fire Department structural framing on each owner/developer. parcel or lot MM PS-3 Prior to approval of each The property owner/developer shall submit an emergency fire access plan to ensure Fire Department grading plan that service to the site is in accordance with the Fire Department service requirements. MM PS-4 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall submit a Construction Fire Protection Plan which Fire Department building permit shall include detailed design plans for accessibility of emergency fire equipment, fire hydrant location, and any other construction features required by the Fire Marshal. The property owner/developer shall be responsible for securing facilities acceptable to the Fire Department and hydrants shall be operational with required fire flow. A construction plan providing a complete timeline and construction goals shall be provided and approved by the Fire Department for all new construction projects. MM PS-5 Prior to issuance of each Plans shall indicate that all buildings shall have sprinklers installed by property Fire Department building permit; to be owner/developer, to include all open and closed parking structures, exclusive of one - implemented prior to each story detached accessory buildings of less than 120 square feet in floor area, and free final building and zoning standing shade structures that are open on at least two sides to sufficiently prevent the inspection accumulation of smoke and hot gases. Additionally, alternatives to automatic sprinkler systems (e.g., self-contained water mist systems) that provide an equivalent level of fire protection may be approved for other buildings on a case -by -case basis upon review and approval by the Fire Department. R:\Projects\WDI13WD10004001Environmental DocumentationWinal SE1MFne1SEIR-022824.do" 4-32 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent E!R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Number Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring _ Fire Department Completion NM PS-6 Prior to issuance of each Plans shall be submitted to ensure that development is in accordance with the City of building permit Anaheim Fire Department Standards, including: a. Overhead clearance shall not be less than 14 feet for the full minimum width of 26 feet for all designated fire access roads. b. All fire access roads, bridges and underground structures to be used for Fire Department access shall be designed to support Fire Department vehicles weighing 78,000 pounds. c. All underground tunnels shall have sprinklers. Water supplies (hydrants) are required at the entrances. Standpipes shall also be provided when determined to be necessary by the Fire Department. d. Adequate off -site public fire hydrants contiguous to the Specific Plan area and onsite private fire hydrants shall be provided by the property owner/developer. The precise number, types, and locations of the hydrants shall be determined during building permit review. Hydrants are to be a maximum of 300 feet apart. e. A minimum residual water pressure of 20 psi shall remain in the water system. Flow rates for all structures shall be a minimum of 1,500 gallons per minute f. Fire access roads shall be provided with vertical and horizontal clearance in compliance with Fire Department standards. Any changes to emergency vehicle access roads shall be included in the overall emergency vehicle access plans for the Resort area, and maintained by property owner/developer. The Fire Code Official shall review all proposed changes and determine whether to approve any deviations from these standards. g. Temporary structure regardless of type of construction shall be considered temporary if at a location for less than 6 months. Other than pre -fabricated construction trailers, structures that are at a location for more than 6 months shall be provided with a fire suppression system and/or fire notification/life safety systems applicable to the use of the structure. h. Integrated Safety Systems (ISS) testing as designed by the property owner/developer or an updated equivalent shall be required for all attractions on an annual basis. The property owner/developer shall provide advance notice to the Fire Department to coordinate witnessing of such testing at the Fire Code Official's discretion. R:1Projects1WD113WD10004001Environmental DammentationTinal SEIRTina1_SEIR•022824.dom 4-33 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion Number MM PS-7 Prior to issuance of the first The property owner/developer shall enter into a Fire Operations Agreement with the Fire Department; City building permit for the City of Anaheim to pay or cause to be paid its fair share of the funding to address the Attorney's Office DisneylandForward Project Operations and Community Risk Reduction staffing needs to maintain adequate levels or as otherwise specified in of service of response and ongoing fire inspection of the Project and in the Anaheim the Development Resort. Agreement between the City and Disney MM PS-8 Prior to approval of street The water supply system shall be designed by the property owner/developer to provide Fire Department improvement plans and sufficient fire flow pressure and storage for the proposed land use and fire protection water improvement plans in accordance with Fire Department requirements. MM PS-9 Prior to the final building The property owner/developer shall submit an emergency evacuation response plan for Fire Department and zoning inspection for a review and approval by the Fire Department. The plan shall require posted notices in hotel all hotel rooms on emergency evacuation procedures and incorporate ongoing emergency evacuation training for hotel staff to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. MM PS-10 Prior to issuance of each Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department as being in conformance Fire Department building permit with the California Fire Code. MM PS- 11 Prior to the placement of An all-weather fire access road shall be provided from the roadway system to and on Fire Department building materials on a the construction site and for fire hydrants at all times, as required by the Fire building site Department. Such routes shall be paved or, subject to the approval of the Fire Department, shall otherwise provide adequate emergency access. Every building constructed must be accessible to Fire Department apparatus. The width and radius of the driving surface must meet the requirements noted in the Anaheim Municipal Code and in accordance with City of Anaheim Fire Department Standards. MM PS-12 Prior to approval of building The property owner/developer shall provide written evidence to the satisfaction of the Fire Department plans Fire Department that all lockable pedestrian and/or vehicular access gates shall be equipped with "knox box" devices as required and approved by the Fire Department. MM PS-13 Prior to approval of on -site Unless each commercial building is initially connected to separate fire services, an Fire Department; City water plans unsubordinated covenant satisfactory to the City Attorney's Office shall be recorded Attorney's Office prohibiting any individual sale of buildings until separate fire services are installed in the building(s) subject to the sale. R:1ProjedslVMI13WD10004001Er ironmental DocumentationTinal SEIRTinal_SEIR-022824,docx 4-34 DisneylandForward Final Subseauent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number MM PS-14 Prior to the issuance of The property owner/developer shall locate and design a Fire Substation within the Fire Department; construction permits Theme Park District, in a location approved by the Fire Chief. The Substation shall Planning & Building associated with meet the below minimum criteria, and is subject to the review and approval of the Fire Department, development of over 10,000 Chief: Planning Services sf within the Theme Park 1. Designated parking stalls, for a medic truck, ambulance, medic golf cart, and 2 Division District or as otherwise staff vehicles specified in the Development Agreement 2. Equipped with dedicated fiber optic line (services for cable, wife) between the City of 3. Two offices with two workstations each Anaheim and Walt Disney 4. Breakroom/kitchen type area Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. 5. Day room able to accommodate up to 8 personnel (4 paramedics, 2 ambulance, 2 Community Risk Reduction) 6. Restrooms with showers/locker rooms MM PS-15 Prior to issuance of building The property owner/developer shall conduct an analysis to determine if the structure Fire Department permits for any structure would interfere with the Emergency Radio Response Communication (ERRC) System greater than 75 feet tall signal. If warranted based on the analysis, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for installation of new or relocated equipment. PDF PS-1 Ongoing during project The existing services and capabilities of the Disneyland Fire Department shall be Fire Department operation maintained for the DisneylandForward Project Site. Existing services include preconstruction checks, pre -investigation of fires and alarms, preplanning for fires and evacuations, fire prevention program activities, and monitoring of pyrotechnics and special effects. Police MM PS-16 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall pay all applicable police protection fees in the Police Department applicable building permit amount then in effect. Alternatively, the City and the property owner/developer may enter into alternative financing arrangements. MM PS-17 Ongoing during operation of The operator of the public parking facilities shall provide an adequate staff of private Police Department the Disneyland Resort security officers for patrol and surveillance of the facilities. R:1Projects1WD113WD10004001Environmental DocumentalioMFinal SEIR%Fina1_SEIR-022824.dou 4-35 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number MM PS-18 Prior to the issuance of the The property owner/developer shall enter into Police Operations Agreement with the Police Department; first building permit for City of Anaheim to pay or cause to be paid its fair share of the funding for police City Attorney's Office DisneylandForward Project personnel and equipment necessary to meet the service need of the Anaheim Resort as or as otherwise specified in determined by the Chief of Police. the Development Agreement between the City of Anaheim and Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. MM PS-19 Prior to issuance of each The Police Department shall review the safety measures incorporated into the building Police Department building permit for parking plans for the parking structures within the DisneylandForward Project Site to be structures submitted by the property owner/developer. The security measures shall include the following or other substitute security measures as may be approved by the Police Department: • Immediate access in priority criminal cases, where an urgent need or demand exists and time is of the essence. • Closed circuit television surveillance and recording equipment or other adequate security measures reviewed and approved by the Police Department. NM PS-20 Ongoing during operation of The property owner/developer shall continue to provide anti -gang, human trafficking, Police Department the Disneyland Resort child exploitation and substance abuse educational programs which are currently provided for park security cast members. NM PS-21 Ongoing during operations The Disneyland Security Department shall be maintained to provide equivalent levels Police Department of service to the entire Disneyland Resort. These services will include initial response, investigation, and report writing. Entry points to the theme parks will be patrolled by the Disneyland Security Department. NM PS-22 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Police Department for review Police Department building permit for a hotel and approval by the Chief of Police, or their designee, for safety, accessibility, crime prevention, and security provisions during both the construction and operative phases for the purpose of incorporating safety measures in the project design including the concept of crime prevention through environmental design (e.g., building design, circulation, site planning, and lighting of parking structures and parking areas). NIM PS-23 Prior to issuance of each The project design shall include parking lots and parking structures with controlled Police Department building permit for or access points to limit ingress and egress if determined to be necessary by the Police including a parking lot Department and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Police Department. and/or parking structure R:1Projects\WDI13WD10004001Emimnmental DocumentationlFinal SEIR%FIna1_SEIR-022824.docx 4-36 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Number Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion MM PS-24 Prior to issuance of the first The property owner/developer shall coordinate with the Police Department to construct Police Department; building permit for the and maintain a Substation in the Theme Park District which meets the following Planning & Building DisneylandForward Project minimum criteria: Department, or as otherwise specified in the Development Designated parking stalls, including EV charging stations, for approximately 4- Planning Services Division Agreement between the City 6 EV, 15-20 regular spaces of Anaheim and Walt Equipped with dedicated fiber optic line Disney Parks and Resorts • Minimum of two private offices U.S., Inc. • Conference/briefing room • Interview room • Kitchen • Breakroom • Locker rooms with showers, restrooms, and lockers • Enclosed bicycle storage for at least 12 bicycles • Equipment storage (size equivalent to two offices) The location and facility components are subject to the review and approval of the Chief of Police. A designee of the Chief of Police shall be included in the initial design phase of the Substation, and shall be regularly consulted during design and construction. Any subsequent modification or relocation to either facility is subject to the review and approval of the Chief of Police. R:1Projects1WD113W01000400\Environmental DommentationlFinal SEIRTina1_SEIR-022B24.d— 4-37 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number MM PS-25 Prior to issuance of the first The property owner/developer shall coordinate with the Police Department to construct Police Department; building permit for and maintain a Satellite Office in the Southeast District or the Theme Park East Overlay Planning & Building development of over 10,000 which meets the following minimum criteria: Department, sf in the Southeast District Designated parking stalls, including 2 -4 EV charging stations, 6 - 8 regular Planning Services or Theme Park East Overlay Division or as otherwise determined spaces in the Development • Equipped with dedicated fiber optic line Agreement between the City • Breakroom of Anaheim and Walt • Conference/briefing room Disney Parks and Resorts Interview room U.S., Inc. • Restrooms • Enclosed bicycle storage for at least 6 bicycles The location and facility components are subject to the review and approval of the Chief of Police. A designee of the Chief of Police shall be included in the initial design phase of the Satellite Office, and shall be regularly consulted during design and construction. Any subsequent modification or relocation to either facility is subject to the review and approval of the Chief of Police. PDF PS-2 Ongoing during project The property owner/developer shall continue to provide and expand its Court Liaison Police Department operation program to meet the needs of the Disneyland Resort. Schools MM PS-26 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall provide proof that school impact fees have been Planning & Building building permit paid consistent with State statute. Department, Building Division R:1Projects1WDR3WD1000400\Environmental Documentatioffinal SEIRTinal_SEIR-022824.doa 4-38 DisneylandFonvard Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number PDF PS-3 Ongoing during project The Disneyland Resort has developed and/or engaged in a series of educational Planning & Building operations programs in cooperation with the local community and regional agencies and Department, Planning organizations, designed to enhance and complement the educational opportunities and Services Division experiences for the youth. The 10 educational programs that currently exist are indicated below 1. Anaheim Union High School District's Anaheim's Innovative Mentoring Experience (AIMS) program 2. Big Brothers & Big Sisters of Orange County's Workplace Mentoring Program at Anaheim Union High School District 3. United Way's Youth Career Connections and Speakers Bureaus at the Anaheim Union High School District 4. Anaheim Family YMCA Avanza Program 5. Orange County Asian Pacific Islander Community Alliance's ROOTED Career Development Program at Anaheim Union High School District 6. Hola Readers at Anaheim Elementary School District 7. Anaheim Elementary School District's Broadway Bound: Empowering Young Performers in Anaheim 8. Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Anaheim -Cypress gEARed Up for the Future 9. School Support Programs Girls Inc.'s Girls Meet the Workforce/Project Accelerate 10. CIF Champion Celebration Girl Scouts of Orange County's Career Exploration Program — Dreams to Reality The property owner/developer will continue these programs and/or substitute similar programs of equal importance. Parks PDF PS-4 Ongoing during operations Substantial area within the Disneyland Resort shall be designed to encourage Planning & Building utilization by pedestrians in a park -like setting linking key areas of the project as Department, Planning described in the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. Services Division; Community Services Department, Parks Division R:\ProjectslWD113WD10004001Envimnmental DocumentationTinal SEIRTInal_SEIR-022824.docz 4-39 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent E1R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number PDF PS-5 Ongoing during operations The property owner/developer shall provide space(s), outside the ticketed theme park Planning & Building gates, easily accessible to theme park guests and non -ticketed visitors, where those who Department, Planning have brought their own food can eat. The proximity of amenities such as drinking Services Division; fountains, vending machines, and restrooms/locker facilities will be considered in the Community Services siting and design or such space(s). Department, Parks Division Libraries MM PS-27 Prior to the issuance of a The property owner/developer shall comply with the Anaheim Municipal Code, Planning & Building building permit for Section 17.08.385, Public Library Facilities Services Areas — Payment of Fees Department, Building development in the ARSP Required. Division Parking and Theme Park Overlays, with the exception of theme park square footage transferred from the DRSP Transportation MM TRA-1 Ongoing during project The property owner/developer shall implement the improvements and pay in lieu fees Public Works development and operations described in Table 19 (Recommended Intersection Improvements) and Table 20 (Other Department, Traffic Transportation Improvements) of the Operational Traffic Analysis for the and Transportation DisneylandForward Project (Gibson 2023), as set forth in Appendix J-2 of Subsequent Division EIR No. 352, within the time frames described in those tables. Prior to the issuance of each building permit, any remaining applicable Traffic Signal Assessment Fees and Transportation Impact and Improvement Fees (Fees) relating to the building permit site shall be paid by the property owner/developer to the City of Anaheim in the amounts determined by the City Council Resolution in effect at the time of issuance of the building permit, except to the extent such fees may have been previously paid or satisfied pursuant to one or more separate agreements between Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. and the City of Anaheim relating to The Disneyland Resort Project or The DisneylandForward Project. MM TRA-2 Prior to approval of the first The property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication (with Public Works final subdivision map or subordination of easements), including necessary construction easements, the ultimate Department, issuance of the first building arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent to their property as shown in the Circulation Development Services permit, whichever occurs Element of the Anaheim General Plan. Division; Public Works first, or as otherwise Department, Traffic established in Development R:1ProjectslWDl13WD10004001Envimnmental DocumentatienTinal SEIRTinal_SEIR-022824.docr 4-40 DisneylandFonvard Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number Agreement between the City and Transportation of Anaheim and Walt Division Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. or as approved pursuant to a Discretionary Exemption to establish the timing of Street and Other Right -of -Way Dedications and Improvements (Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.40.060 Dedications and Improvements) MM TRA-3 Prior to demolition of an Replacement parking for the existing parking spaces removed will be constructed or Planning & Building existing Disneyland Resort secured. Department, Planning parking lot Services Division; Access Improvements and Public Parking Facilities Included in Project Design Public Works Ongoing during project (Exhibit 4.3.1b — Interstate 5-West Street/Disneyland Drive Interchange (Showing Department, Traffic operation Entrance to West Parking Facility) and Exhibit 4.3.1c —Interstate 5/Katella Interchange and Transportation (Showing Entrance to East Parking Facility) Division Public Parking Facilities. New public parking facilities will be constructed at opposite sides of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area to receive traffic from the I-5. A minimum of 24,500 guest and cast parking spaces will be provided. The West Parking Area is oriented to receive southbound I-5 traffic, and the parking facilities in the East Parking Area and adjacent ARSP Parking Overlay will be oriented to receive northbound I-5 traffic. MM TRA-4 To be implemented prior to To be shown on street improvement plans: Planning & Building final building and zoning Department, Planning inspections for the east and Improved Access. Access roads leading up to the parking facilities shall be sized to Services Division; west parking structures/ accommodate traffic at peak hours, thereby substantially reducing the likelihood of Public Works facilities backups onto City streets and freeway ramps, subject to the approval of the City Department, Traffic Engineer. and Transportation Division No cast or guest access or egress will occur from Walnut Street. R:1Projects%WD113WD10004001Environmental DocumentationTinal 3EIR1F1na1_SEIR-022924.doa 4-41 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number NM TRA-5 Prior to issuance of each Speed Parking. Building plans shall show direct ramps to each level of the East and Planning & Building building permit; to be West Parking Area facilities to minimize internal circulation within the garages and Department, Planning implemented prior to final accommodate the project's "speed parking" operation. Services Division; building and zoning Public Works inspections for both the east Department, Traffic and west parking structures and Transportation Division MM TRA-6 To be implemented prior to To be shown on street improvement plans: Planning & Building final building and zoning Department, Planning inspection for each parking Conveyance Systems. In addition to an extensive network of landscaped pedestrian Services Division; structure and/or facility thoroughfares, conveyance systems will transport Disneyland Resort guests around Public Works The Anaheim Resort. Guest transportation systems will move guests from the parking Department, Traffic facilities to the Theme Park District. The monorail/guest transportation systems shall and Transportation move guests within the Theme Park District. Future connections may also be provided Division to the Southeast District. MM TRA-7 To be implemented prior to To be shown on street improvement plans: Planning & Building final building and zoning Department, Planning inspections for the second Theme Park Drop -Off Area. To provide access to the attractions in the Specific Plan Services Division; theme park for Phase II; and area to people staying outside of The Disneyland Resort area, a bus and shuttle drop- Public Works if pursued, to be off area will be located adjacent to Harbor Boulevard north of Disney Way as shown Department, Traffic implemented prior to final on Exhibit 4.4.2a of the Specific Plan; or, in Phase IV, the facility may be located and Transportation building and zoning adjacent or internal to the East Parking Area or the adjacent ARSP Parking Overlay Division inspections for the East Parking Structure(s), or other accessible location in the Theme Park District. The types Parking Area or adjacent of vehicles served at this facility may include public and private passenger shuttles and ARSP Parking Overlay buses. parking structure(s) or other accessible location in Phase IV R:IProjectslWDI%3WD10004001Envimnmental DocumentationTinal SEIR1Final_SEIR-022824.d— 4-42 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Design Feature Number MM TRA-8 Ongoing during project operation Measure Transportation Demand Management Prop -ram The need to minimize cast vehicle trips to reduce congestion and improve air quality, consistent with the goals of both the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and with the Regional Mobility Plan of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), is recognized. The Disneyland Resort will implement and administer a comprehensive Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for all cast, which will strive to achieve an average vehicle ridership (AVR) goal of 1.5 persons per vehicle and, an average length of out -of -area guest stay of 1.72 days. At this point in project development, it is not possible to predict precisely which programs and activities would be most successful for The Disneyland Resort in meeting these goals. In addition, property owner/developer will review annually with the City any changes to the TDM Program and the Program's effectiveness toward achieving a 1.5 AVR. In consultation with the SCAQMD, the City of Anaheim and other agencies, and after analyzing the effectiveness of these items, Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. will select specific programs for implementation. Objectives of the TDM program are: • Increase ridesharing and use of alternative transportation modes by guests. • Meet the cast 1.5 AVR target. • Provide a menu of commute alternatives for The Disneyland Resort cast, to reduce project -generated trips. • Provide transportation "linkages" to existing and future transportation modes (other than single -occupant vehicle travel) for both The Disneyland Resort cast and guests. Implementation strategies and elements of the TDM program for cast and guest trips are described below. Cast Making a commitment to commute management and trip reduction will become an integral part of the new -hire training. A menu of TDM program strategies and elements for both, existing and future cast commute options would be examined, including, but not limited to, the following: R:%Projects%WDI13WD10004001Environmental DocumentationTinal SEIR\Final_SEIR-022824.do" 4-43 DisneylandFonaard Final Subsequent ElR No. 352 Responsible for I Completion Monitoring Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division; South Coast Air Quality Management District DisneylandFonaard Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Number Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion • Onsite Service. Onsite services, such as the food, retail, and other services may be provided to the cast. • Ridesharine. An online listing of all cast members living in proximity to The Disneyland Resort may be developed for the purpose of providing a "matching" of members with other cast members who live in the same geographic areas and who could rideshare to The Disneyland Resort. • Vanuooling. An online listing of all cast members living in proximity to The Disneyland Resort may be developed for the purpose of matching numbers of cast who live in geographic proximity to one another and could comprise a vanpool to The Disneyland Resort. • Transit Pass. Southern California Rapid Transit District and Orange County Transportation Authority (including commuter rail) passes may be promoted through financial assistance and onsite sales to encourage cast to use the various transit and bus services to The Disneyland Resort from throughout the region. • Commuter Bus. As commuter "express" bus service expands throughout the region, passes for use on these lines may be provided for cast members who choose to use this service. Financial incentives will be provided. • Shuttle Service. A computer listing of all cast members living in proximity to The Disneyland Resort may be generated, and a local shuttle program will be offered to encourage cast members to travel to work by means other than the automobile. • Bicycling. A Disneyland Resort Bicycling Program may be developed to offer a bicycling alternative to cast members. Secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers will be provided as part of this program. Maps of bicycle routes throughout the area would be provided to inform potential bicyclists of these options. • Rental Car Fleet. A "fleet vehicle" program may be developed to provide cast members who travel to work by means other than an automobile with access to automobiles in case of emergency, medical appointments, etc. This service would help cast members use alternative modes of transportation by ensuring that they would be able to have personal transportation in the event of special circumstances. • Emereenev Ride Home Program. The program may provide cast members who rideshare, or use transit or other means of commuting to work, with a prearranged ride home in a taxi, rental car, shuttle, or other vehicle, in the event R:1ProjectslWDI%3WD10004001Environmental DommentatlonTinal SEIR%Final_SEIR-022824.docx 4-44 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Number Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion of emergencies during the work shift. In essence, this program addresses the concerns of the cast member who rideshares and might be stranded without a vehicle in the event of an emergency. • Local Hirint Efforts. Continue to actively recruit prospective employees within 20 miles. • Tarect Reduction of Lonaest Commute Trip. Design an incentives program for ridesharing and other alternative transportation modes to put highest priority on reduction of longest employee commute trips. • Work Schedule - Staggered Shifts. The Disneyland Resort cast may work different hours throughout the daily hours of park operation. A thorough review of cast shifts would be undertaken to provide the potential for cast shifts during nonpeak travel times, thus lessening peak hour congestion. - Compressed Work Week. The Disneyland Resort may review the possibility of developing a 'compressed work week" program, which provides for fewer work days but longer daily shifts, as an option for cast members. This program would help eliminate certain trips on certain days that would otherwise be generated daily by The Disneyland Resort Cast. - Telecommutine. The Disneyland Resort employs cast members in a wide a variety of jobs including clerical, administrative and professional roles. Sometimes that work can be completed at home. Telecommuting will be encouraged on a limited basis as operational needs allow. • Work Environment/Facility Management - Parkine Management. The Disneyland Resort may develop a parking management program that provides incentives to those who rideshare or use transit means other than single -occupant auto to travel to work. - Management Staff. The existing Disneyland theme park transportation management staff may be expanded onsite to accommodate new employees and to explore relationships with adjacent employers to determine whether joint efforts can lead to greater reductions in VMT by Disneyland Resort cast members and other employees in the Anaheim Resort. R:1Projecffi1WD113WD10004001Environmental DocumentationTinal SEIRWinel_SEIR-022824.do 4-45 DisneylandForward Final Subseauent E!R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Number Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion - Amenities. Transit systems, transit shelters, bicycle storage areas, and other amenities may be provided with efficient parking management for cast and guests. - Access. Preferential access to high occupancy vehicles and shuttles may be provided. - Delivery Management. Schedule deliveries in nonpeak traffic congestion hours to the extent reasonably practicable. • Financial Incentives In addition to the above items, certain financial incentives will be integrated into The Disneyland Resort TDM program, such as: - Financial Incentive for Ridesharing and/or Public Transit. Currently, federal law provides tax-free status for up to $300 per month per employee contributions to employees who vanpool or use public transit (including commuter rail and/or express bus pools). In addition, The Disneyland Resort provides free OCTA passes and a 75% subsidy (up to $100/month) for other transit passes. - Financial Incentive for Bicycling_and Walking. Cast members may be offered financial incentives for bicycling to work; they would be provided with secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers. Cast members may also receive a cash incentive for reporting a bike or walk commute. - Financial Incentive for Carpooling. Cast members may be offered a cash incentive for carpooling to work. - Special "Premium" for the Partici iation and Promotion of Trip Reduction. Tickets/passes to project theme parks and/or vacations could be offered to employees who recruit other cast members for vanpool, carpool, or other Disney trip reduction programs. • Guests - Even though visitors to The Disneyland Resort are estimated to average nearly four persons per vehicle, additional programs and incentives could and will be provided to encourage even more guest use of ridesharing, transit, and other modes of travel to and from The Disneyland Resort. The property owner/developer is currently developing a list of potential programs and is working with the City of Anaheim and OCTA on the R:1Projects1WD113WDI0004001Environmental DocumenlationlFinal SEIRTinal_SEIR-022824.docz 4-46 DisneylandFomard Final Subsequent E/R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion Number provision of convenient linkages to other modes of transportation. Marketing materials for The Disneyland Resort will describe it as an "auto -free" zone with a range of transportation amenities where cars are not needed. - Bicycle spaces for guests shall be visible from the primary entrance, illuminated at night, and protected from damage from moving or parked vehicles. • Construction Contractors The property owner/developer shall provide notification to the general construction contractors regarding the coordination of rideshare services for construction employees provided by the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN). MM TRA-9 Ongoing during project The property owner/developer shall continue to participate in a clean fuel shuttle Public Works operations program, and shall participate in the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) in Department, Traffic conjunction with the ongoing operation of The Disneyland Resort, including the and Transportation Disney ARSP Properties. Proof of compliance with this measure shall be submitted to Division the City Traffic Engineer. MM TRA-10 Ongoing during If Anaheim Police Department or Anaheim TMC personnel are required to provide Police Department; construction temporary traffic control services, the property owner/developer shall reimburse the Public Works City, on a fairshare basis, if applicable, for reasonable costs associated with such Department, Traffic services. and Transportation Division MM TRA-11 Ongoing during project The property owner/developer will establish an onsite public information office (which Public Works operations is conveniently and accessibly located) where construction scheduling and phasing Department, Traffic information will be available to the public. The public information office shall be open and Transportation during construction hours. A telephone "hotline" will be provided to the community to Division allow members of the public to call the office with questions or comments during business hours. At least one liaison officer will be staffed at the office. The liaison officer shall be available to answer questions from the public and shall coordinate with the City of Anaheim, other public agencies, and major developers in the area regarding the coordination of construction activities and infrastructure improvements. The City shall be provided with a monthly summary of the calls received and follow-up actions. R:1Projects%WDI13WDI0004001Environmental DocumentatioMFinal SEIRWinal_SEIR-022824.dom 4-47 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Timing Number Measure MM TRA-12 Pri7issu�ancee of each The property owner/developer shall submit a Traffic Mitigation and Construction buifor The Phasing and Control Plan. To the extent needed, as determined by the Public Works Disrt or, any Department, the Traffic Mitigation and Construction Phasing and Control Plan shall othcifically identify the following: prosmeasure MM TRA-13 Prior to approval of each grading plan or issuance of each demolition or building permit, whichever occurs first; implemented during grading and construction MM TRA-14 Prior to approval of each grading plan or issuance of each demolition or building permit, whichever occurs first; implemented during grading and construction MM TRA-15 Prior to approval of each grading plan or issuance of each demolition or building permit, whichever occurs first; implemented during construction a. A Construction Staging Area Plan showing the location and size of the construction staging area. The Plan shall also show how the staging area will be screened from view in compliance with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. A Truck Route Plan identifying truck routes along arterials, avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible and in compliance with the Sound Pressure Level Ordinance. The Plan shall show conformance with the external noise limits for construction between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. The Plan shall also prohibit construction traffic on residential streets where improvements are not planned and shall provide measures to ensure that truck drivers are directed away from residential streets and travel on approved routes only. Measures to assist in guiding truck movement on the arterial roadway system include, but are not limited to, provision of truck route maps to truck drivers and placement of flagpersons and construction signage at appropriate locations. The Truor repaving ructck Route Plan shall provide for monitoring of street conditions and potential repairing and/ by property owner/developer after completion of constion as required or the City Engineer. A Construction Traffic Management Plan which includes mechanisms to reduce construction -related traffic congestion which shall be implemented during grading and construction, including, but not limited to, the following: I. Configure construction parking to minimize onsite and offsite traffic interference. 2. Minimize obstruction of through -traffic lanes. 3. Provide flagpersons to guide traffic, as determined in the plan. A Trip Reduction Plan for construction crew vehicles shall be prepared to reduce Potential vehicle trips on the road and identify parking locations for construction employees and equipment. R:IProjects1WD113WD10004001Environmental DocumentationTinal SEIRIFnaI_SEIR-022824.docx 4-48 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Responsi4forMonitoompletion Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division DisneylandForward Final Subsequent E1R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number MM TRA-16 Prior to approval of each A Traffic Management Plan for phasing of roadway improvements, specifying the Public Works building permit sequencing of construction to do the following: Department, Traffic 1. Coordinate scheduling with other planned construction in the area. and Transportation Division 2. Coordinate scheduling with other infrastructure improvements to allow them to be facilitated efficiently during roadway improvements, such as sewer, storm drain, and water line improvements. 3. Outline procedures for any required traffic detours during construction, including provision of tour bus stops. 4. Phase each roadway improvement to allow access to all existing businesses/residential areas. In some instances this will require lane -by -lane renovation, temporary bypass roads, or traffic reroutes. 5. Employ vertical shoring as often as possible. This will minimize the amount of road surface that will be disturbed at a given location. 6. Sequence the construction of each roadway improvement to minimize disruption to residents and businesses. 7. Establish offsite parking and staging areas, where practical and possible, to minimize the impact to existing level of service on adjacent roadways. These offsite parking and staging areas will allow a dispersion of traffic flow to noncritical areas and will encourage bussing of construction workers from the offsite areas to the construction sites. 8. Identify how the project improvement construction schedules and haul routes will be coordinated with other areawide improvements. The property owner/developer shall coordinate with the City of Anaheim Traffic Management Center (TMC), the Anaheim Convention Center and area hotels to ensure continued operations of these facilities, as well as the continued operation of The Disneyland Resort. MM TRA-17 Ongoing during project The property owner/developer shall submit a quarterly update report showing Public Works construction construction activities for the upcoming quarter which shall include traffic mitigation Department, Traffic and control planning and construction scheduling. and Transportation Division MM TRA-18 Prior to approval of each The property owner/developer shall show how the project will be in compliance with Public Works grading plan the Traffic Mitigation and Construction Phasing and Control Plan. Department, Traffic and Transportation Division R:1Projects%WDI13WD10004001Environmental Documenta8onTinal SEIR1Fnal_SEIR-022824.dom 4-49 DisneylandFonvard Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number MM TRA-19 Prior to the issuance of the The location of any proposed gates across a driveway shall be subject to the review Public Works first building permit and approval of the City Engineer. Gates shall not be installed across any driveway or Department, Traffic private street in a manner which may adversely affect vehicular traffic on the adjacent and Transportation public streets. Installation of any gates shall conform to the current version of Division Engineering Standard Detail No. 475. _ MM TRA-20 Prior to the issuance of Plans shall show that all driveways shall be constructed with a minimum fifteen (15) Public Works building permits foot radius curb returns as required by the City Engineer, unless otherwise approved Department, Traffic by the City Engineer. and Transportation Division MM TRA-21 Prior to the issuance of Security in the form of a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, completion Public Works building permits or final guarantee, or cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to the City Engineer shall be Department, map approval, whichever posted with the City to guarantee the satisfactory completion of all engineering Development Services occurs first requirements of the City of Anaheim, including preparation of improvement plans and Division installation of all improvements, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, water facilities, street grading and pavement, sewer and drainage facilities and other appurtenant work, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with the specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer, as may be modified by the City Engineer. Installation of said improvements shall occur prior to final building and zoning inspections. MM TRA-22 Prior to approval of each The following Street Design Elements shall be shown on each tentative tract or parcel Public Works tentative tract or parcel map map: Department, a. Street cross -sections, including dimensions, labels, circulation designation (i.e., Development ServicesDivision Resort Secondary) and whether public or private. b. Street grades and vertical alignment. c. Horizontal alignment, including radii, and cul-de-sac radii. Tribal Cultural Resources MM TCR-1 Prior to the issuance of any Tribal Cultural Resources Monitoring. The property owner/developer or contractor Planning & Building permits allowing ground- as designee shall provide evidence in the form of an executed Agreement to the City Department, Planning disturbing activities that of Anaheim Planning and Building Department that they have retained a qualified Services Division cause excavation to depths Native American tribal monitor to provide third -party monitoring during construction - greater than current related ground disturbance activities and to recover and catalogue tribal resources as foundations necessary. The tribal monitor shall be from or approved by the Gabrieleiio Band of Mission Indians — Kizh Nation. The agreement shall include (i) professional qualifications of Native American monitor; (ii) detailed scope of services to be provided including but not limited to pre -construction education, observation, R:1ProjectslWDI%3WD1000400%Envimnmental DowmentationTinal SEIRTinal_SEIR-022824.docz 4-50 DisneylandFonaard Final Subsequent E1R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number I 1: evaluation, protection, salvage, notification, and/or curation requirements, as _ applicable, with final documentation/report to Public Works Inspector; (iii) contact information; (iv) communication protocols between Contractor and Monitor for scheduling to facilitate timely performance; (v) acknowledgment that if the tribal monitor is unavailable or unresponsive based on terms stipulated in the agreement, property owner/developer or contractor as designee may contract with another qualified tribal monitor acceptable to the City. The selection of the qualified professional(s) shall be subject to City acceptance based on generally accepted professional qualifications and certifications, as applicable. The cover sheet of the grading plans shall include a note to identify that third party tribal monitoring is required during excavation and grading activities in accordance with the City -approved Agreement. Contact information for approved tribal monitor shall be provided by the contractor to the City inspector at the pre -construction meeting. SR TCR-I Prior to approval of any The project property owner/developer shall coordinate with the City Planning Planning & Building amendment to the ARSP or Department to undergo a solicitation of Native American consultation pursuant to Department, Planning the City of Anaheim Senate Bill (SB) 18 (California Government Code, Section 65352.3). Services Division General Plan Utilities and Service Systems Public Services and Utilities - Water MM UTIL-I Prior to issuance of building Among the water conservation measures to be shown on plans and implemented by the Utilities Department, permits property owner/developer within the Specific Plan area include the following: Resource Efficiency • Use of low -flow sprinkler heads in irrigation system. Section; Planning & Building Department, • Use of waterway re -circulation systems. Building Division • Low -flow fittings, fixtures, and equipment, including low flush toilets and urinals. • Use of self -closing valves on drinking fountains. • Use of reclaimed water for irrigation and washdown when it becomes available. • Continuation of the existing cooling tower recirculation system. • Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic systems which use moisture sensors. • Low -flow shower heads in hotels. R:1Projects1WD113WD1000400\Environmental DacumentationTinal SE1MFinel_SEIR-022824.do 4-51 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent E1R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number • Water -efficient ice machines, dishwashers, clothes washers, and other water - using appliances. • Use of irrigation systems primarily at night when evaporation rates are lowest. • Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water conservation. • Use of water -conserving landscape plant materials wherever feasible. • Use of vacuum and other equipment to reduce the use of water for washdown of exterior areas. MM UTIL-2 Prior to each final building The property owner/developer shall submit a certified water audit for landscape Utilities Department, and zoning inspection irrigation systems except for areas within the Theme Parks. Resource Efficiency Section MM UTIL-3 Prior to issuance of each All water supply planning for the project will be closely coordinated with, and be Utilities Department, building permit subject to the review and final approval of, the Public Utilities Department, Water Water Engineering Engineering Division and Fire Department. Division; Fire Department MM UTIL-4 Prior to issuance of each Water pressure greater than 80 pounds per square inch (psi) shall be reduced to 80 psi Utilities Department, building permit or less by means of pressure reducing valves installed at the property Water Services owner/developer's service. MM UTIL-5 Prior to issuance of building Plans shall specifically show that the water meter and backflow equipment and any Utilities Department, permits other large water system equipment will be installed to the satisfaction of the Public Water Services Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division, aboveground and behind the building setback line in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys and in accordance with Ordinance No. 4156. Prior to the final building and zoning inspections, the water meter and backflow equipment and any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division, in accordance with the building permit plans. R."Projects%WD113WD10004001Environmental DocumentationTinal SEIRTinal_SEIR-022824.dau 4-52 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent E!R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Number Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion MM UTIL-6 Prior to final building and A separate water meter shall be installed for landscape water on all projects where the Utilities Department, zoning inspections landscape area exceeds 1,000 square feet for non-residential uses in accordance with Water Services Ordinance No. 6160. MM UTIL-7 Ongoing during project The property owner/developer shall implement the following required improvements Utilities Department, development and operations to the water supply system, in accordance with Anaheim's Water Rates, Rules and Water Services Regulations, Water Services Administrative Procedures and Design Guidelines (APDG), and Water Services Standard Specifications (WSSS), within the timeframes described below or as further determined by the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division. The cost of all Main Extensions, Main Enlargements, abandonments, relocations, and easements documents shall be paid for by the property owner/developer of the properties served by these mains in accordance with Rule 15A. • In the Theme Park District, west of Disneyland Drive, all new fire water connections, including but not limited to, those that would serve, private fire hydrants, in The Disneyland Resort shall be made to water mains served by the 335 Pressure Zone. Specifically, no new fire water connections are permissible on existing water mains in Walnut Street or Magic Way. Any new fire connections for buildings adjacent to these mains shall connect to the 20-inch water main in Disneyland Drive. • The Southeast District shall be served by at least two points of connection with internal looping. o Any new water service connections along Harbor Boulevard shall require the construction of a 12-inch water main from Convention Way intersection to a point approximately 400-ft north of the intersection. o Any new connection to the existing water main in Clementine Street, north of Orangewood Avenue, shall require replacement of the existing 8-inch water main with a new 12-inch water main. • Abandon the existing 12-inch water main within the Esplanade between Harbor Boulevard and Disneyland Drive. This work shall be completed concurrently with any proposed improvements along Disneyland Drive or Harbor Boulevard. • New easements may be required where public water infrastructure are located within private property through abandonment(s) of a public right-of-way. Such easements shall limit improvements that impact access for operation and maintenance of existing facilities. Alternatively, the property owner/developer may abandon and/or relocate existing public water infrastructure provided the property owner/developer prepares an analysis to determine any associated and R:1ProjectskVVD113WD10004001Er ironmental DocumentationWinal SEIR1Final_SEIR-022824.docz 4-53 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent E1R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number appropriate improvements due to the work. The property owner/developer shall submit the analysis and any associated improvement plans to the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division for review and approval. • Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner/developer shall submit hydraulic analyses to determine the adequacy of existing and proposed facilities if required by the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division. Public Services and Utilities — Wastewater/Sewer MM UTIL-8 Prior to issuance of any The property owner/developer shall prepare a Sewer Study for review and approval by Public Works Building Permit for any new the City Engineer, funded by the property owner/developer. Said Sewer Study shall Department, hotel development within evaluate whether there is adequate capacity in the Harbor Boulevard sewer system to Development Services the Theme Park District that accept the flow from the proposed new hotel use. The Sewer Study shall determine Division and Design proposes a portion or the whether the proposed hotel project would create a deficiency in the Harbor Boulevard Division entirety of the hotel sewer system or the downstream City sewer system. If the Sewer Study shows there project's sewer flow to would be deficiency in the Harbor Boulevard sewer system or the downstream sewer discharge to the City sewer system, the Sewer Study shall identify the required sewer system upgrades. If a sewer system on Harbor system upgrade is required, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for the Boulevard, north of Katella design and construction of the upgrade to the sewer system and all associated Avenue improvements [collectively, "Sewer Improvements"]. The City -identified and approved cost of the Sewer Improvements may be credited toward the applicable sewer impact fees for the hotel project upon completion of the Sewer Improvements and acceptance by the City. The design of the Sewer Improvements and the related sewer improvement plans shall be completed prior to issuance of any Building Permit for the hotel project and the sewer improvement plans shall identify all associated improvements required for the required Sewer Improvements. Construction of Sewer Improvements shall be completed prior to final building and zoning inspections for the hotel. If no sewer system upgrade is required, the developer shall be required to pay the applicable sewer impact fees, pursuant to A.M.C. 10. 12.085, with applicable credits applied for sewer flows from existing uses to be removed. NM UTIL-9 Prior to issuance of a The property owner/developer shall prepare a Sewer Study for review and approval by Public Works plumbing permit resulting in the City Engineer, funded by the property owner/developer. Said Sewer Study shall Department, a cumulative flow of more evaluate whether there is adequate capacity in the Harbor Boulevard sewer system to Development Services than 50 gpm peak in the accept the proposed redirected flow. The Sewer Study shall determine whether the Division and Design Theme Park District proposed redirected flow would create a deficiency in the Harbor Boulevard sewer Division resulting in redirected system or the downstream City sewer system. If the Sewer Study shows there would existing sewer flows that be deficiency in the Harbor Boulevard sewer system or the downstream sewer system, currently do not flow to the Sewer Study shall identify the required sewer system upgrades. If a sewer system R:1Projects1WDI13WD100040MEmironmental DocumentationTinal SEImFinal_SEIR-022824.dou 4-54 DisneylandForward Final Subseauent E!R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Number Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion Harbor Boulevard to instead upgrade is required, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for the design flow to Harbor Boulevard and construction of the upgrade to the sewer system and all associated improvements via non -gravity flow (e.g. [collectively, "Sewer Improvements"]. The City -identified and approved cost of the lift station, force main, Sewer Improvements may be credited toward the applicable sewer impact fees for the ejector pump, etc.) hotel project upon completion of the Sewer Improvements and acceptance by the City. The design of the Sewer Improvements and the related sewer improvement plans shall be completed prior to issuance of any Building Permit for the hotel project and the sewer improvement plans shall identify all associated improvements required for the required Sewer Improvements. Construction of Sewer Improvements shall be completed prior to final building and zoning inspections for the hotel. If no sewer system upgrade is required, the developer shall be required to pay the applicable sewer impact fees, pursuant to A.M.C. 10.12.085, with applicable credits applied for sewer flows from existing uses to be removed. MM UTIL-10 Prior to issuance of the first The property owner/developer shall prepare a Sewer Study for review and approval by Public Works building permit for the City Engineer, funded by the property owner/developer. Said Sewer Study shall Department, development of over 10,000 evaluate whether the total sewer flow proposed to the Katella Avenue sewer system, Development Services sf in the Southeast District east of Harbor Boulevard, for development authorized by the DisneylandForward Division and Design or Theme Park East Overlay project for the Theme Park East Overlay/Southeast District does not exceed a peak Division flow of 285 gpm. And that the total sewer flow proposed to be directed to the Harbor Boulevard sewer system, south of Katella Avenue, for development authorized by the DisneylandForward project for the Theme Park East Overlay/Southeast District does not exceed a peak flow of 2,000 gpm (total allowable development within Theme Park East Overlay/Southeast District). If the projected sewer effluent flow exceeds these stipulated amounts for either the Katella Avenue or Harbor Boulevard sewer system, the Sewer Study shall determine whether the development project creates a deficiency in the Katella Avenue sewer system, east of Harbor Boulevard, or the Harbor Boulevard sewer system, south of Katella Avenue, sewer collections systems and the downstream City sewer system. Should a deficiency be created, the Sewer Study shall identify the required sewer system upgrades and improvements ("Sewer Improvements"). If Sewer Improvements are required, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for the design and construction of the Sewer Improvements. The City -identified and approved cost of the sewer improvements may be credited toward the applicable sewer impact fees for the development project upon completion of the Sewer Improvements and acceptance by the City. The design of the Sewer Improvements and the sewer improvement plans shall be completed prior to issuance of any Building Permit for development in the Theme Park East Overlay/Southeast District and shall identify all associated improvements required for the required Sewer R:1ProjectslWDI%3WD1000400%Environmental DocumentatlonTinal SEIRT1nal_SEIR-022824.docx 4-55 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent E!R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion Number Improvements. Construction of Sewer Improvements shall be completed prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for development within the Theme Park East Overlay/Southeast District. If no improvement is required, the developer shall be required to pay the applicable sewer impact fees, pursuant to A.M.C. 10.12.085. MM UTIL-11 Prior to issuance of any The property owner/developer shall prepare a Sewer Study for review and approval by Public Works Building Permit for any new the City Engineer, funded by the property owner/developer. Said Sewer Study shall Department, hotel development within evaluate the sewer flow from the hotel(s) directed to Clementine Street and ultimately Development Services the Parking Overlay Katella Avenue. Sewer improvements required to address deficiencies in the sewer Division and Design (between Harbor Boulevard systems in Clementine Street and/or Katella Avenue, east of Harbor Boulevard, shall Division and Manchester Avenue) be the sole responsibility of the property owner/developer ("Clementine and Katella Sewer Improvements"). Should a deficiency be created, the Sewer Study shall identify the required sewer system upgrades and improvements. If a sewer system upgrade is required, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for the design and construction of the Clementine and Katella Sewer Improvements and all associated improvements. The City -identified cost of the Clementine and Katella Sewer Improvements may be credited toward the applicable sewer impact fees for the hotel project(s) upon completion of the Sewer Improvements and acceptance by the City. The design of the Clementine and Katella Sewer Improvements and the sewer improvement plans shall be completed prior to issuance of any Building Permit for the hotel project(s) and identify all associated improvements required for the Sewer Improvements. Construction of sewer improvements shall be completed prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the first hotel development. If no improvement is required, the developer shall be required to pay the applicable sewer impact fees, pursuant to A.M.C. 10.12.085. Public Services and Utilities — Storm Drains MM UTIL-12 Prior to approval of a final The property owner/developer shall participate in the City's Master Plan of Storm Public Works subdivision map, or Drains and related Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program to assist in mitigating Department, issuance of a grading or existing and future storm drainage system deficiencies as follows: Development Services building permit, whichever occurs first The property owner/developer shall submit a report for review and approval by the Division City Engineer to assist with determining the following: a. If the specific development/redevelopment does not increase or redirect current or historic storm water quantities/flows, then the property owner/developer's responsibility shall be limited to participation in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program to provide storm drainage facilities in 10- and 25-year storm frequencies and to protect properties/structures for a 100-year storm frequency. R:1Projects%WDI13WD10004001Environmental DocumentationTinal SEIR1Rna1_SEIR-022024.doa 4-56 DisneylandForward Final Subseauent OR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number b. If the specific development/redevelopment increases or redirects the current or historic storm water quantity/flow, then the property owner/developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney's office of the impact prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, pursuant to the improvements identified in the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area. The property owner/developer shall be required to install the storm drainage facilities as recommended by the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area to provide storm drainage facilities for 10- and 25-year storm frequencies and to protect properties/structures for a 100-year storm frequency prior to acceptance for maintenance of public improvements by the City or final building and zoning inspection for the building/structure, whichever occurs first. Additionally, the property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program as determined by the City Engineer which could include fees, credits, reimbursements, or a combination thereof. As part of guaranteeing the mitigation of impacts on the storm drainage system, a storm drainage system improvement phasing plan for the project shall be submitted by the property owner/developer to the City Engineer for review and approval and shall contain, at a minimum, (1) a layout of the complete system; (2) all facility sizes, including support calculations; (3) construction phasing; and, (4) construction estimates. MM UTIL-13 Prior to the issuance of The City shall require that building plans indicate that new developments will Public Works building permits minimize stormwater and urban runoff into drainage facilities by incorporating design Department, features such as detention basins, on -site water features, and other strategies. Development Services Division Public Services and Utilities — Electricity MM UTIL-14 Prior to issuance of each In order to conserve energy, the Disneyland Resort shall comply with the California Utilities Department, building permit; to be Energy Code (Title 10), which may include the following: Resource Efficiency implemented prior to each final building and zoning Consultation with the City energy -conservation experts at the Anaheim Public Section inspection Utilities Community and Sustainability Division for assistance with energy - conservation design features. • Use of high -efficiency air conditioning systems, connected if feasible to a computerized central energy management system, and meeting all control, scheduling and load efficiency requirements of the California Energy Code (Title 24, Building Efficiency Standards). R:1Projects1WDIQWD10004001Environmental Documentation7inal SEIRIFinal_SEIR-022824.docx 4-57 DisneylandForward Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number • Use of electric high -efficiency (NEMA) motors intended to conserve energy. • While recognizing the unique lighting apparatus required for some theme park uses, use of motion sensing lightswitch devices and light -emitting diode (LED) energy -efficiency lighting fixtures for indoor and outdoor lighting when feasible, T8 lamps, metal hallide and/or high-pressure sodium (HID) lamps. • Incorporation of electric vehicle chargers into parking structures. If the property owner/developer incorporates grid -tied renewable energy generation Utilities Department, MM UTIL-15 Prior to issuance of a building permit systems into the project, they shall comply with the Anaheim Public Utilities Resource Efficiency Department's most recent Interconnection Guidelines. Section MM UTIL-16 Two to five years prior to The property owner/developer shall provide Anaheim Public Utilities Department Utilities Department, energizing new switching electrical engineering staff with its forecasted electric demand and schedules to allow Electric Services stations for sufficient lead time for planning, design, engineering, materials procurement, and Division construction of new electrical facilities, if required, to accommodate the Project's additional or modified electrical demand. Forecasts must be at least two to five years: e.g., two years for the construction of up to two line extensions and five years for the construction of three line extensions or a new substation. Public Services and Utilities — Natural Gas As discussed in Draft Subsequent EIR No. 352, Section 5.16, Utilities and Service Systems, Natural Gas, incorporates MMs Section 5.5, Energy. Public Services and Utilities — Solid Waste MM UTIL-17 Ongoing during theme park The property owner/developer shall implement a solid waste management plan which Public Works operations and prior to final has been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department to ensure that the Department, Streets building and zoning project plans comply with AB 939, SB 1383 related to reducing organic waste in and Sanitation Division inspections of new theme landfill, the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, as administered by the City of park development Anaheim, and the County's and City's Integrated Waste Management Plans. Implementation of said plan shall commence upon occupancy and shall remain in full effect as required by the Street and Sanitation Division and may include the following plan components: a. Detailing the locations and design of on -site recycling facilities. b. Providing on -site recycling receptacles to encourage recycling. c. Complying with all Federal, State, and City regulations for hazardous material disposal. d. Continuing participation in the City of Anaheim's voluntary "Recycle Anaheim," program or other substitute program as may be developed by the City. R:1Projects%WD113WD10004001Environmental DocumentationTinal SEIR\Rna1_SEIR-022824.dom 4-58 DisneylandFonvard Final Subsequent E1R No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Timing Measure Responsible for Completion Design Feature Monitoring Number In order to meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989 (AB 939), the property owner/developer shall implement numerous solid waste reduction programs at the Disneyland Resort, including: • Facilitating paper recycling by providing chutes or convenient locations for sorting and recycling bins. • Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially from retail areas) by providing adequate space and centralized locations for collections and baling. • Facilitating glass recycling (especially from restaurants) by providing adequate space for sorting and storing. • Providing trash compactors for nonrecyclable materials whenever feasible to reduce the total volume of solid waste and the number of trips required for collection. • Prohibition of curbside pick-up within The Disneyland Resort. MM UTIL-18 Ongoing during project The existing solid waste recycling and waste minimization practices at The Disneyland Public Works operation Resort shall be expanded as feasible to serve new development in The Disneyland Department, Streets Resort. Existing practices include: and Sanitation Division • Usage of recycled paper products for stationary, letterhead, and packaging. • Recovery of materials such as aluminum and cardboard. • Collection of office paper for recycling. • Collection of polystyrene (foam) cups for recycling. • Collection of glass, plastic, kitchen grease, laser printer, toner, cartridges, oil, batteries, and scrap metal for recycling or recovery. MM UTIL-19 Prior to issuance of building Plans shall show that trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in a location Public Works permits acceptable to the City of Anaheim Department of Public Works, Streets and Sanitation Department, Streets Division. On an ongoing basis, trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in and Sanitation Division Ongoing during project accordance with approved plans on file with said Department. operation MM UT1L-20 Prior to issuance of each The property owner/developer shall demonstrate that the plans include provisions for Planning & Building building permit the installation of trash and recycle receptacles near all benches and near high traffic Department, Planning areas such as plazas, transit stops and retail and dining establishments. Services Division R:%ProjectslWDP3WD10004001Environmental DocumentationlFinal SEIRTinel_SEIR-022924.docx 4-59 DisneylandFonvard Mitigation Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 Measure/Project Design Feature Timing Number Measure Responsible for Monitoring MM UTIL-21 Ongoing during project Upon City request and no less than annually or more than semi-annuall the ro e operation Building owner/developer shall prepare and submit to the Planning & Building Directororthe r DepartmePlanning nt, Planning designee a consolidated Construction Waste Management Report for all development Services Division projects on Disney Properties demonstrating that at least 75 percent of non -hazardous construction and demolition debris has been recycled or salvaged, or has otherwise complied with the City's waste diversion program, which Report shall identify the materials diverted from disposal and whether the materials have been sorted on site or co -mingled. Public Service and Utilities — Television MM UTIL-22 Ongoing during project If the City of Anaheim determines that the proposed project creates a significant 7erDe nin & Building operation on broadcast television reception at local residences, the property P P rh' owner/devartment, Planning shall install a signal booster or relay system on the roof of the tallest project bices Division to restore broadcast television reception to its original condition as soon as pract Public Services and Utilities — Standard Requirements SR UTIL-1 Prior to the issuance of each The property building permit revi w and p oval (1) a Landscape Documentation Package and (2) landscape and D Planning &Building irrigation plans with appropriate water use calculations in accordance with the Services Divissionring requirements of Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 10.19, Landscape Water — — - Efficiency. SR UT1L-2 Prior to issuance of building The property owner/developer shall provide evidence to the Planning &BuildinFDivision &Building permits Director or their designee that all sewage and wastewater disposal into the sewent, Building system shall comply with OCSD's Wastewater Discharge Regulations, including thprocurement of the necessary permits by food service establishments that would b developed in the ARSP area. t SR UTIL-3 Prior o issuance of building The property owner/develop P permits er shall provide proof of payment to the Planning & Planning &Building Building Director or their designee for a sanitary sewer service charge to OCSD. Department, Building SR UT1L-4 Prior to issuance of building The roe P Division permits property rh owner/developer er shall provide proof of payment to the Planning & Planning &Building Building Director or their designee for a capital facilities connection charge to OCSD. Department, Building Division R:1Project'WD"3WD10004001Environmenta1 DocumentallonWinal SE1MF1na1_SEIR•022824.dOcx 4-60 Completion DisneylandFonvard Final Subsequent ElR No. 352 Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Number Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion SR UTIL-5 Prior to issuance of building The property owner/developer shall be required to demonstrate to the Planning Planning & Building permits Department, Building Division that building plans meet the applicable Title 24 Energy Department, Building Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (24 CCR 6). These Division standards are updated, nominally every three years, to incorporate improved energy efficiency technologies and methods. SR UTIL-6 Prior to issuance of building The property owner/developer shall be required to demonstrate to the Planning Planning & Building permits Department, Building Division that building plans meet the applicable California Department, Building Green Building Standards (24 CCR11). Division R:\ProjectsIWOI3WD10004001En ironmental DocumentationWinal SEIR1Final_SEIR-022824.docx 4-61 EXHIBIT "E" "ARSP THEME PARK AND PARKING OVERLAYS" [Behind this sheet-] (DEV2021-00069) EXHIBIT E k aty of w M, -Afibh�I C Both Rd L Ball -Rd' % NlagieitYayi,%Lnee%d J- -Cep rdtm Ave k It 3 Py'pt. : �A 1A.d A66heim L -71 .-6telllb Ave I r,- �� F� — , — J -- Katella -Ve THEME PARKEAST en' .116UNDAorr -'A J range -god -Ye- 1-1 r C of Garde G'rove Orang e ,ChapmanAve LEGEND The Anaheim Resort Boundary Z :: The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Boundary City Boundary MAP FEATURES Parcels subject the Theme Park Overlay (East and West) Zone in the C-R District City LegTo 1.61 Data, 2022 ly a ind" Dam. 2722 Parcels subject to the Parking Overlay Zone in the C-R District 0 7 SWO ],500 'Eee1 EXHIBIT "F" "DISNEYLANDFORWARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" [Behind this sheet.] (DEV2021-00069) EXHIBIT F DisneylandForward Conditions of Approval The conditions of approval include all mitigation measures and project design features as part of Mitigation Monitoring Program (No. 387) for this project (as required by Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code). For purposes of these conditions of approval, the following terms are used: a. Applicant: Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc., its successors and assigns. b. Property Owner/Developer: Any owner or developer of properties owned by Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. or other subsidiaries of The Walt Disney Company within the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (DRSP) or the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP). C. The Disneyland Resort: The Project site encompasses The Disneyland Resort, including the Theme Park, Parking and Southeast Districts of the DRSP, and properties in the ARSP Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1) owned or controlled by Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S., Inc. or other subsidiaries of The Walt Disney Company. NO. I CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PRIOR TO GRADING PERMIT ISSUANCE RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT That prior to issuance of each grading permit, a rough or Public Works Department, precise grading plan prepared by a registered Civil Engineer Development Services shall be submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN 2 That prior to approval of each street improvement plan the Public Works Department, following shall be provided (for a one (1) year maintenance Development Services period) in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer: A. Public Realm Parkway and median island landscaping and irrigation maintenance. B. Provision for the replacement of any tree planted in accordance with landscaping plans in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased, and/or dead. Page 1 of 8 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF TTM OR TPM OR ISSUANCE OFA BUILDING PERMIT 3 That prior to the approval of each tentative tract or parcel map Public Utilities or issuance of each building permit, whichever occurs first, Department, Electrical Public Utility Easements (PUEs) will be recorded and/or Services Division abandonment of PUEs will be processed to the satisfaction of the Public Utilities Department for the following circumstances: A. As a result of increases in right of way where electrical, water, and communication facilities are located adjacent to the existing right of way, the facilities shall be either located within the new right of way or relocated to new adjacent areas requiring a PUE. B. The undergrounding of power and communication lines along the major streets will result in the need to obtain PUEs for placement of pad mounted or subsurface equipment and related facilities required as a result of the overhead to underground conversion work. C. Alterations to existing private buildings and/or construction of new structures (buildings, signs, landscaping elements, etc.) may require relocation of existing electrical, water, and/or communication facilities. This will require abandonment of existing PUEs and recordation of new PUEs to accommodate the relocation. Such relocations shall be performed at the property owner/developer's cost. D. Abandoning of existing public streets and/or rights of way will require PUEs for public utilities currently in place or relocation of public utilities and recordation of new PUEs by property owner/developer. 4 That prior to the approval of each final tract or parcel map, Public Works Department, vehicular access rights to all public streets adjacent to subject Development Services tract or parcel except at approved access points, shall be released and relinquished to the City of Anaheim. 5 Prior to approval of a tentative tract or parcel map, or issuance Public Works Department, of a building permit, vehicular access points to the public Traffic Engineering streets shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Division Traffic Engineer. All access points shall be in substantial conformance with the District Concept Plans in Section 5.0, "Design Plan", of the Specific Plan document. Page 2 of 8 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE 6 That prior to issuance of each building permit unless records Public Utilities indicate previous payment, a fee for street lighting purposes Department, Electrical shall be paid to the City of Anaheim based on the length of Services Division street frontage in an amount as established by City Council resolution with credit against the fee given for City authorized improvements installed by the property owner/developer. 7 That prior to submittal of an application for a building permit Public Works Department, for the East Public Parking Structure, the property Traffic Engineering owner/developer shall meet with the City Traffic Engineer to Division develop plans prepared to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer showing a minimum of fourteen (14) toll lanes and a minimum of 500 vehicle storage capacity prior to the toll booths or alternative configuration approved by the City Traffic Engineer based on a traffic study, and prior to final building and zoning inspection for the East Public Parking Structure said toll lanes/storage capacity or alternative configuration approved by the City Traffic Engineer shall be provided. 8 That prior to issuance of building permits for each hotel or Planning and Building Vacation Ownership Resort parking facility, plans shall show Department, Planning the location and configuration of hotel or Vacation Ownership Services Division Resort employee and guest parking spaces. 9 Prior to submitting an application for a building permit for each Public Works Department, Disneyland Resort hotel or Vacation Ownership Resort project, Traffic Engineering the hotel or Vacation Ownership Resort project shall be Division designed to accommodate airport bus service to and from the hotels or Vacation Ownership Resort project and plans showing these areas, accessible to the general public, shall be submitted to the City Traffic Engineer for review and approval as part of an application for the building permit. 10 Prior to issuance of a building permit for a Parking Facility in Public Works Department, the East Parking Area and/or adjacent ARSP Parking Overlay, Traffic Engineering the property owner/developer shall submit a comprehensive Division; wayfinding program for vehicular access and pedestrian access to the City for review and approval by the Public Works Planning and Building Director and Planning Director if in the public right-of-way and Department, Planning the Planning Director if on private property. The approved Services Division Page 3 of 8 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT wayfinding program shall be installed prior to final building and zoning inspections of the Parking Facility. 11 Prior to issuance of a building permit for a Parking Facility in Public Works Department, the East Parking Area and/or adjacent ARSP Parking Overlay, Traffic Engineering the property owner/developer shall submit vehicle access plans Division from Disney Way and/or Manchester Avenue/Clementine Street to the parking facility prepared to the satisfaction of and subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Plans shall include, but not be limited to, design and width of proposed driveways, design of potential vehicle ramps to and from the parking facility to Disney Way including height (clearance over street grade and maximum height of ramp) and width of the ramp and any associated right-of-way improvements, including lane configurations, signal modifications, use of concrete under the ramp, and sidewalk/parkway modifications. The property owner/developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with modifications to the public right-of-way and all access improvements shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to final building and zoning inspections of the Parking Facility. 12 Prior to submittal of an application for a building permit for a Public Works Department, new public parking facility, the property owner/developer shall Traffic Engineering meet with the Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division Division, to develop a general operations plan for the new public parking facility containing information required by the City Traffic Engineer relating to such matters as ingress and egress to/from the structure during normal, moderate and peak periods of vehicle flow; speed parking operations including conflict minimization, direction of oversized vehicles and direction of vehicles requiring ADA-accessible spaces; location of cast parking; location of electric charging stations; emergency ingress/egress; and any other information deemed material to the City Traffic Engineer relating to the structure's operation. The operations plan shall be approved by the City Traffic Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. Any changes to the operations plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Traffic Engineer. Page 4 of 8 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS 13 That prior to final building and zoning inspections, the water Public Utilities backflow equipment and any other large water system Department, Water Utility equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Public Division Utilities Department, Water Utility Division, in either underground vaults or behind the Setback Realm area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Such information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. ONGOING/GENERAL 14 That pedestrian walkway lighting plans in the public right of Public Utilities way shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Utilities Department, Electrical Department, Electrical Services Division and the Police Services Division; Department prior to installation. Anaheim Police Department 15 That the roadway lighting of all public streets shall be designed Public Utilities in accordance with the Anaheim Resort Identity Program and Department, Electrical associated construction specifications. Services Division 16 That the property owner/developer shall pay or cause to be paid Public Utilities all costs associated with replacing the existing City street light Department, Electrical system within the public right of way adjacent to or within the Services Division Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Area or Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area with street lights designed in accordance with the Anaheim Resort Identity Program. 17 That all trees planted in the Public Realm shall be planted in Public Works Department, accordance with the standard City Tree Planting Detail. Development Services 18 That no development shall occur unless such development is Planning and Building substantially in accordance with The Disneyland Resort Department, Planning Specific Plan No. 92-1 document on file with the Planning Services Division Department Amendment No. 9, as adopted by Ordinance No. , and with the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2, on file with the Planning Department, Amendment No. 17, as adopted b\ Ordinance No. Page 5 of 8 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 19 That, in the event a parcel is subdivided and there is a need for Planning and Building common on- site circulation and/or parking, prior to the Department, Planning recordation of a subdivision map, an unsubordinated covenant Services Division providing for reciprocal access and/or parking, as appropriate, approved by the City Traffic Engineer and the Planning and Building Department and in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney, shall be recorded with the Office of the Orange County Recorder. A copy of the recorded covenant shall then be submitted to the Planning Services Division of the Planning and Building Department. 20 Ongoing during project operation of the West Public Parking Public Works Department, Structure(s), a minimum of eleven (11) toll lanes and a Traffic Engineering minimum of 500 vehicle storage capacity prior to the toll Division booths accessed directly from Disneyland Drive shall be provided, unless the City Traffic Engineer approves an alternative configuration. 21 That any modifications to the restricted setback in Project Public Works Department, Design Section 3.3-10, to Walnut Street (e.g., turn restrictions, Traffic Engineering narrowing of street, etc.) other than those approved as part of Division; the DisneylandForward Project shall be subject to the review and approval of the Planning Commission. All modifications Planning and Building shall be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Department, Planning Engineer. Services Division 22 That should pedestrian bridge(s) over Harbor Boulevard or Public Works Department, pedestrian bridges/overpasses over Disneyland Drive be Traffic Engineering constructed, safe and convenient pedestrian access to/from the Division east parkway side of Harbor Boulevard and to/from the east parkway side of Disneyland Drive, respectively, shall be provided during construction by the property owner/developer, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 23 Ongoing, any parking facility in the Southeast District shall be Planning and Building loaded and emptied to minimize evening noise generation, in Department, Planning compliance with the City's noise ordinance. Services Division 24 In the event the existing Harbor Boulevard Drop off Area is Public Works Department, proposed to be relocated adjacent or internal to the East Parking Traffic Engineering Facility and/or in a parking facility in the adjacent ARSP Division Parking Overlay, that prior to submittal of an application for a building permit for the East Parking Facility or a Parking I Page 6 of 8 NO. I CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Facility in the adjacent ARSP Parking Overlay, the property owner/developer shall meet with the City Traffic Engineer to review the location and design of the drop-off area. The design plan of drop-off area shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Prior to final building and zoning inspections of said facility, the drop-off area shall be provided by the property owner/developer in accordance with the approved design plan. 25 That within thirty (30) days of the City Council's action on Amendment No. 9 to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1, the property owner/developer shall provide the Planning and Building Department with three (3) printed copies and one (1) electronic copy of an amended Specific Plan document reflective of the City Council's action. Upon the Planning Department's review and approval of the amended document as being in conformance with the City Council's action three hard copies of the final amended document and electronic copies prepared to the Planning Director's satisfaction including all text and graphics in the document to enable amendments to be made to the document in the future, if necessary, shall be provided by the property owner/developer to the Planning Department. 26 That the property owner/ developer, as specified in the individual mitigation measures, shall be held responsible for compliance with the mitigation measures and implementation of the project design features identified in Final Subsequent EIR No. 352 and for complying with the Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 387, in compliance with Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code. Furthermore, the property owner/developer, as specified in the individual mitigation measures and the project design features, shall be responsible for any direct costs associated with the monitoring and reporting required to ensure implementation of those mitigation measures and project design features identified in Final Subsequent EIR No. 352. RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 27 That every five years following the adoption of Ordinance No. Public Works Department, for Amendment No. 9 to the Disneyland Resort Specific Traffic Engineering Plan, the property owner/developer shall submit a parking evaluation to the City Traffic Engineer for review and approval, Division to assess the adec uac� of parkinw, for The Disneyland Resort Page 7 of 8 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT project. The parking evaluation shall be paid for by the property owner/developer and shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer. If the parking evaluation indicates that parking is deficient, then additional parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with the recommendations of the evaluation and in conformance with the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. 28 Ongoing, the southerly vehicular access to the West Parking Public Works Department, Area on Magic Way shall be provided so long as the parking Traffic Engineering facility is required to serve the Project. Division 29 Ongoing, to prevent toll booth queues from reaching public Public Works Department, streets and potentially causing congestion, the property Traffic Engineering owner/developer shall implement the following operational Division contingency at theme park Parking Facilities during peak arrival periods approximately 15 to 20 days per year to speed up processing of vehicles through the toll booths. During peak arrival periods, property owner/developer traffic managers and Anaheim traffic control officers shall visually monitor traffic conditions. If and when traffic in the toll booth queues reaches a public street, the traffic managers shall contact the on -duty toll booth manager and the property owner/developer shall provide complimentary parking to arriving guests, typically in 20- to 100-car blocks, to allow free flow of vehicles until the queues reduce and queues no longer reach a public street. 30 No later than thirty (30) days after the City Council's action on Public Works Department, Amendment No. 9 to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. Traffic Engineering 92-1, the property owner/developer shall cease using Gate 26 Division on Walnut Street as an authorized access point for vehicle ingress to the Project site, and no later than five (5) years after said City Council action date shall cease using Gate 26 as an authorized point of vehicle egress from the Project site onto Walnut Street. In no event shall these shifts in vehicle access be considered to restrict emergency and/or security vehicles from using Gate 26 for access to and from the Project site, or to prevent the property owner/developer from allowing use of Gate 26 for vehicle ingress or egress in exigent circumstances. Page 8 of 8 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, THERESA BASS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original Ordinance No. 6574 considered at a public hearing at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the 161 day of April, 2024, and introduced at the conclusion of the public hearing on the 171h day of April, 2024, and that the same was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 7th day of May. 2024, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: Mayor Aitken and Council Members Kurtz, Diaz, Leon, Rubalcava, Faessel and Meeks NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th of May, 2024. CITY LERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (SEAL) ANAHEIM BULLETIN MYN M See Proof on Next Page Anaheim Bulletin 1920 Main St. Suite 225 Irvine , California 92614 fi 14) 796-2209 200 S. Anaheim Blvd., Suite 217 Anaheim, California 92805 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Orange County I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a parry to or interested in the above -entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the Anaheim Bulletin, a newspaper that has been adjudged to be a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Orange County, State of California, on December 28, 1951, Case No. A-21021 in and for the City of Anaheim, County of Orange County, State of California; that the notice, of which the annexed is a true printed copy, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to wit: 05/16/2024 I certify (or declare) under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct: Executed at Anaheim, Orange County, California, on Date: May 16, 2024. ORD-6574 (5190168) - Page 1 of 2 SUMMARY PUBLICATION CITY OF ANAHEIM ORDINANCE NO. 6574 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND ADOPTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO.92-2 (AMENDMENT NO. 17 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN) (D E V2021-00069) This ordinance amends various and numerous provisions of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 to comprehensively update text, graphics and Imagery throughout to reflect Disneyland Forwarid, an update to the Disneyland Resort Prolect, including providing administrative review of future development In the Theme Park and Parking Overlays, revising structural height standards In the Theme Park Overlay, requiring 360 Degree Architectural Treatments for theme park uses, revising setbacks along certain streets and adlacent to residential zones, and updating standards to reflect proposed modifications associated with Disneyland Forward. I, Theresa Bass, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Is a summary of Ordinance No. 6574, which ordinance was considered at a public hearing at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim on the 16th day of April, 2024 and Introduced at the conclusion of the public hearing on the 17th day of Aprl1, 2024, and was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Council on the 7th day of May, 2024 by the fol lowing roll call vote of the members thereof: AYES: Mayor Aitken and Council Members Kurtz, Diaz, Leon, Rubalcava, Faessel and NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None The above summary is a brief description of the sublect matter contained in the text of Ordinance No. 6574, which has been prepared pursuant to Section 512 of the Charter of the City of Anaheim. This summary does not Include or describe every provision of the ordinance and should not be relied on as a substitute for the full text of the ordinance. To obtain a copy of the full text of the ordinance, please contact the Office of the City Clerk, (714) 765-5166, between 8:00 AM and 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. There is no charge for the copy. 151972(LM Anaheim Bulletin Published: 5/16/24 ORD-6574 (5190168) - Page 2 of 2 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, THERESA BASS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original Ordinance No. 6574 and was published in the Anaheim Bulletin on the 16tn day of May, 2024, pursuant to Section 512 of the City Charter of the City of Anaheim. OC14RK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (SEAL)