MobayedVictoria Ticorat
From:George Mobayed <georgem@icicorporate.com>
Sent:Monday, September
To:Nicholas J. Taylor; Ashleigh Aitken; Norma C. Kurtz; Jose Diaz; Carlos A. Leon; Natalie
Rubalcava; Stephen Faessel; Natalie Meeks
Cc:A-Cariann New (cariann4title@yahoo.com); cwalkeranaheimplanning@gmail.com;
Lucille Kring; Lieberman; Luis Andres Perez;
Commissioneracastro@gmail.com; commissionerdeirdrekelly@gmail.com
Subject:\[EXTERNAL\] The Hills Preserve Project, Salt Development, LLC
Importance:High
Some people who receivedthis message don'toftengetemail fromgeorgem@icicorporate.com. Learnwhythis isimportant
Warning: This email originated from outside theCity ofAnaheim. Donotclicklinks oropen
attachments unless you recognize thesender andareexpecting themessage.
Hi Nicholas Taylor, City Council Members, & City Planning Commission Members
Iam writing to STRONGLY APPOSE Development Application NO. 2021-00137, which
consists of a 498 Unit Multi-family development, 6 Single Family Lots and 80,000 sq ft
of commercial uses.
Ireside in the community off Eucalyptus & Santa Ana Canyon Road, and for the record
am a Land Developer as well.
The EIR is absolutely incorrect and should be revised by a neutral party:
Year 2029 Plus Project Recommended Improvements 13.3.1 Intersections The results
of the intersection capacity analysis presented previously in Table 9-1 show that the
proposed Project will not cause unacceptable operational LOS conditions at any of the
twenty-one (21) key study intersections under the Year 2029 Plus Project traffic
scenario. As such, no improvements are required under this traffic scenario.”
First and foremost; the existing infrastructure of roads cannot possibly handle what will
be a minimum of 3,000+ additional trips per day on Santa Ana Canyon Road. We are
already enduring a daily influx of traffic caused by vehicles by passing thru caused by
traffic on the 91fwy in both directions. There have been too many accidents, near
misses and pedestrian vs vehicle incidents on Santa Ana Canyon Road already.
It is almost impossible to turn left on to Santa Ana Canyon Rd. most of the day, and
there will be increased danger for the children crossing after school from El Rancho
Middle School, Haphatha Lutheran School, and Canyon High School.
1
That being said, none of the residents from Eucalyptus to Imperial Hwy. would ever be
in favor of widening Santa Ana Canyon Road, which is exactly what it would take in
order to handle the increased traffic load.
Also, it is hard to believe that many other negative impacts would not systematically
come into play with a large development like this in the foothills. The increased
demand on the Electrical Grid, Sewer, Water, Storm Runoff, etc. will absolutely have
an adverse effect caused by this development.
Also, what about Police and Fire protection? With the addition of some 500+ residents
will the city be building another Fire Station or reopening the East Anaheim Office of
Anaheim P.D.?
Iam confident that all that live in this canyon are completely against this development.
The city needs to heed the wishes of its residents, and not focus on the potential for
additional fee and tax revenue income!
Sincerely
Mr. GeorgeS. Mobayed, CPM
President & C.O.O.
2
3