Loading...
63-0259RESOLUTION NO e 63R -259 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1550 WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive a petition for zoning variance from DR. G. R. RAMAGE JR. and FRED C. MELLO owners of certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows All that portion of Section 4, in Township 4 South, Range 10 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the West line of Lot 10 of Miles Rancho, as shown on a map thereof recorded in book 4, page 7, Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County, distant thereon North 0 10' 00" West 767.94 feet from the South- west corner of said Lot 10, said Southwest corner being the intersection of the center lines of the road shown on a map of survey recorded in Book 1, page 55, Record of Surveys, in the office of the County Recorder of said Orange County, and running thence South 0 10' 00" East, along said West line 68 feet to the Northeast corner of the land conveyed to Everett J. Martinez by deed filed November 21, 1946, as document No. 14392, in the office of the Registrar of Titles of Orange County; thence North 89 04' 00" West along the North line of said land conveyed to Martinez 206.18 feet; thence North 0 10' 00" West parallel with said West line of Lot 10, 43.40 feet; thence Northeasterly 58 feet more or less, to a point which bears North 89 0.' 00" West 153 feet from the point of beginning; thence South 89 04' 00" East 153 feet to the point of beginning. AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim upon said petition on February 18, 1963, notice of which said public hearing was duly given as required by law and the provi- sions of Title 18 Chapter 18076 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No c _65f,. Series 19 62 recommending that Variance Noo 1550 be ,gram Sub, _to the_ condition therein set forth ;and -1- WHEREAS, thereafter, within twenty -two (22) days from the date of the adoption of said resolution, the City Council did elect, upon its own motion, to review the action taken by the City Planning Commission in granting said variance and did set a public hearing thereon to be held on the 2nd day of April, 1963, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. in the City Hall in the City of Anaheim and notice of such public hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, after due investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all the evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City Council does find and determine that: 1. There are exceptional or extraordinary circum- stances or conditions applicable to the property involved or to the intended use of the property that do not apply generally to the property or class of use in the same vicinity and zone. 2. That such a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone and denied to the property in question. 3. That the granting of such materially detrimental to injurious to the property such vicinity and zone in located. 4. That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the comprehensive general zoning plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that a conditional zoning variance be, and the same is hereby granted permitting a waiver of the one -story height limitation requirement on the property herein above described, in order to permit the construction of a two story, seven -unit apartment building, subject to the following condition: That this variance is granted subject to the completion of Reclassification Proceedings No. 62 -63 -79 now pending. The City Council hereby reserves the right to revoke such variance permit for good cause or failure of said owners, their heirs, successors or assigns, to comply with the Anaheim Municipal Code and regulations and the condition herein. Said variance is granted for the term prescribed by the Anaheim Municipal Code unless otherwise specified herein. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is _.s. ned and approved by me this 2nd day of April, 1963. ATTEST: DENE M. WILLIAMS variance will not be the public welfare or or improvements in which the property is OR SF HE "DEPUTY CITY CLERK -2- STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM (SEAL) I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 63R -259 was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the 2nd day of April, 1963, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Krein and Coons NOES: COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT: COUNCILMAN: Dutton TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCILMAN: Schutte AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim approved and signed said Resolution No. 63R -259 on the 2nd day of April, 1963, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim, this 2nd day of April, 1963. DENE M. WILLIAMS CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM By DEPUTY CITY CLERK