63-0054RESOLUTION NO. 63R
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 1535
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive a petition for zoning variance from
G. L. WUNSCH and MAXINE WUNSCH, owners
of certain real property situated 'fin tfie ity o Anaheim, County
of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
Lot 34 of Tract No. 2537, as shown on a map
thereof recorded in Book 75, pages 38 and 39,
Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange
County.
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a
public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
December 10 19 62 notice of which said public hearing
was duly given as requirec"1 by law and the provisions. of Title 18,
Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission, after due
inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its
behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. 555 Series
1962-63 denying Variance No. 1535 and
WHEREAS, therafter, within twenty-two (22) days from
the date of the adoption of said resolution, a written appeal
was filed with the City Council of the City of Anaheim protesting
the action of the City Planning Commission denying said
variance, and said appeal was set for public hearing, on
January 15 1963 at 7:00 o 4 c l ock P.M. at the i
Hall in the City of Anaheim, and notice of such public hearing
was duly given as required by law and the provisions of Title 18,
Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, a slue investigation and studies made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all the
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the. City Council
does find and determine that:
1. There is no substantial property ight_possessed
by other property in the same vicinity and zone
and denied the subject property.
2. It appears that the subject property can be
adequately developed and used under the present
zone.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning Commission
denying Variance No. 1535 be, and the same is hereby sustained,
and that the petition for Variance No. 1535 to permit the
establishment of a beauty salon within a residence situated on
the property hereinabove described,be, and the same is hereby
denied.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me
this 15th day of January 19 63
ATTEST:
C Y CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
YOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council
held on the 15th day of January 19 63 by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCILMEN: DUTTON, CHANDLER, KREIN AND COONS.
NOES: COUNCILMEN: NONE.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: SCHUTTE.
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of
Anaheim signed and approved said resolution on the 15th day
of January 19 63
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 15th day of
January 1963
C 'Y CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.