1962-0474WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive a petition for zoning variance from
MARY B. DOESKEN owner
oa in rear property s ui a ec fi� in t e i ty o Anah qty
of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
The West 132 feet of the East 661 feet of the
North half of the Northwest quarter of the
Northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 4
South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho Los
Coyotes, as shown on a Map recorded in Book 51,
page 11 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of
Orange County, California.
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a
public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
March 1962 notice of which said public hearing
was du iven as requir by law and the provisions of Title 18,
Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission, after due
inspection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its
behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No 260 Series
1961 -62 denying Variance No. 1452 and
WHEREAS, therafter, within twenty -two (22) days from
the date of the adoption of said resolution, a written appeal
was filed with the City Council of the City of Anaheim protesting
the action of the City Planning Commission denying said
variance, and said appeal was set for public hearing on
A ril 1 19 62 at 7 :00 occlock P.M. at the City
a n the City of Ana e m, and notice of such ,public hearing
was duly given as required by law and the provisions of Title 18,
Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, after due investigation and studies made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all the
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, the City Council
does find and determine that:
RESOLUTION NO. 62R -47L
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 1452
1. There is no substantial property rig ht_possessed
by other property in the same vicinity and zone
and denied the subject property.
2. It appears that the subject property can be
adequately developed and used under_.the present
zone.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning Commission
denying Variance No. 1452 be, and the same is hereby, sustained
and that the request of Mary B. Doesken, 278 West Ball Road,
Anaheim, California, for a variance permitting a waiver of the
wall requirements and the single -story height limitations on
the property hereinabove described be, and the same is hereby,
denied.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me
this 15th day of May 19 62
ATTEST:
A/.
CITY CLERK CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
I, DENE
do hereby certify
adopted at a
held on the 15th
following vote of
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of
Anaheim signed and approved said resolution on the 15th day
of May 19 62
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 15th day of
May 19 62
(SEAL)
YOR OF T CI OF NAHE M
M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim,
that the foregoing resolution was passed and
regular meeting of the City Council
day of May 19 62 by the
the members thereof:
COUNCILMEN: Chandler, Dutton, Krein, Schutte
and Coons.
COUNCILMEN: None.
COUNCILMEN: None.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.