Resolution-PC2025-038RESOLUTION NO. PC2025-038
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR REDUCED SETBACKS FOR `PARKING DECK A' AND
DETERMINING THAT THE PREVIOUSLY -CERTIFIED FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 339, ADDENDA NO. 11
AND ADDENDA NO. 13, SERVE AS THE APPROPRIATE
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND MAKING CERTAIN
FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2024-00077)
(1715 SOUTH DOUGLASS ROAD)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning
Commission") did receive a verified application from Anaheim Real Estate Partners, LLC for the
approval of Development Project No. 2024-00077 (the "Proposed Project") on certain real
property located at 1715 South Douglass Road in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of California, as generally depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 3.23 acres in size in the Transit District of the
Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. The development standards and regulations of Chapter
18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the
"Code") applies to the Proposed Project. The Property is designated on the Land Use Element of
the General Plan for Mixed -Use Urban Core land uses; and
WHEREAS, on September 27, 2022 and October 4, 2022, the City Council approved
Addendum No. 11 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental
Impact Report No. 339 (FSEIR No. 339) associated with the OCVIBE Mixed Use Project,
including General Plan Amendment No. 2020-00532; Miscellaneous Case No. 2020-00739;
Reclassification No. 2020-00333; Zoning Code Amendment No. 2020-00174; Development
Agreement No. 2020-00004 including Master Site Plan (Miscellaneous Case No. 2020-00751), a
request for Density Bonus and Development Incentives, and Deviation from Engineering Standard
Details; Final Site Plan No. 2020-00004; Final Site Plan No. 2020-00005; Final Site Plan No.
2020-00006; Final Site Plan No. 2020-00007; Final Site Plan No. 2020-00008; Conditional Use
Permit No. 2010-05492 Amendment; Conditional Use Permit; Minor Conditional Use Permit; and
Tentative Tract Map No. 19153, including Street Name Change; and
WHEREAS, on October 29, 2024 and November 13, 2024, the City Council approved
Addendum No. 13 (Development Project No. 2023-00050) to FSEIR No. 339 associated with
Amendment No. 1 to the OCVIBE Master Site Plan, including a General Plan Amendment, a
Bicycle Master Plan amendment, a Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan amendment, a Master
Site Plan amendment, a Zoning Code amendment, an Amended and Restated Development
Agreement No. 2020-00004, a Conditional Use Permit amendment, and a Minor Conditional Use
Permit amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Proposed Project would demolish five existing industrial buildings and
retain one existing industrial building to construct a seven -level parking structure with 1,840
parking stalls, a digital advertising display, murals, and associated landscaping and hardscaping.
The Proposed Project includes the following land use entitlements:
1. A Final Site Plan which encompasses approximately 3.23 acres in the Transit
District adjacent to Douglass Road, to construct a seven -story, 1,840-stall parking structure called
Parking Deck A.
2. A Minor Amendment to the OCVIBE Master Site Plan (MIS2020-00751) to reflect
the changes proposed for Parking Deck A.
3. A Minor Conditional Use Permit for reduced structural setbacks along Douglass
Road and SR-57.
4. A Minor Conditional Use Permit amendment to modify the OCVIBE Mural Plan
for one additional mural and;
WHEREAS, Section 18.60.080 (Planning Director Reviews) of Chapter 18.60
(Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code provides that, when multiple discretionary land use
applications are submitted for concurrent Planning Commission review and approval, and one or
more of such applications requires Planning and Building Department Director review and
approval, all such applications shall be subject to full review and approval by the Planning
Commission as the granting authority; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
"CEQA"), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA
Guidelines"), the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental
documents for the Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the
City of Anaheim on November 17, 2025, at 5:00 p.m., with notice of said public hearing having
been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the
Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and to investigate and
make findings in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines that previously -certified
FSEIR No. 339 and its Addenda, including Addendum No. 11, Addendum No. 13, and Mitigation
Monitoring Plan No. 383 (MMP No. 383), prepared for the OCVIBE Mixed -Use Project in
compliance with the requirements of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines; and Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 106C (MMP No. 106C); and other previously -approved
environmental documents for development in the Platinum Triangle area, serve as the appropriate
environmental documentation in connection with the Proposed Project (collectively the "CEQA
Documents"); that the approved mitigation measures continue to be appropriate for the project;
that no further environmental documentation needs to be prepared under CEQA for the Proposed
Project; and
- 2 - PC2025-038
WHEREAS, none of the conditions described in Sections 15162 or 15163 of the State
CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR or negative
declaration have occurred, specifically:
1. There have not been any substantial changes in the Proposed Project that require
major revisions of the CEQA Documents because of new significant environmental effects or a
substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.
2. There have not been any substantial changes with respect to the circumstances
under which the Proposed Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the CEQA
Documents due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial
increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects.
3. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and
could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time FSEIR No. 339
was certified as complete or the other CEQA Documents were adopted, that shows any of the
following: (a) the Proposed Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in
FSEIR No. 339 or the other CEQA Documents; (b) significant effects previously examined will
be substantially more severe than shown in FSEIR No. 339 or the other CEQA Documents; (c)
mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible
and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Proposed Project, but the
Owner declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives; or (d) mitigation measures or
alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in FSEIR No. 339 or the other
CEQA Documents would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment,
but the Owner decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made
by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said
hearing with respect to the request for a Minor Conditional Use Permit, does find and determine
the following facts:
Section 18.20.195.050.0501 Setbacks Abutting Public Rights -of -Way, Private Streets and Alleys
Douglass Road — Parking Structure (10 feet required; 0 feet proposed)
Douglass Road — Wayfinding Signage (10 feet required; 2 feet proposed)
SR-57 — Exterior Drive -Aisle (10 feet required; 3 feet proposed)
SR-57 — Existing Industrial Building (10 feet required; 0 feet proposed)
1. The setback reduction is permitted by Paragraph .0502 (Modifications) in
Subsection .050 (Structural Setbacks) of Section 18.20.195 (Arena District and Transit District
Standards) of Chapter 18.20 (PTMU Overlay Zone) pursuant to approval of a MCUP.
2. The setback reduction would not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, as the
location of the setback for the structure, vehicular driveway, and pedestrian wayfinding signs are
not adjacent to an existing building. In addition, the reduction in setbacks do not adversely affect
growth or development of the area because they are confined to the subject property.
-3- PC2025-038
3. The setback reduction would allow for the full development of the site and would
not be detrimental to health or safety since the site layout provides adequate circulation and
landscaped areas to buffer the structure from surrounding uses while maintaining adequate vehicle
and pedestrian connectivity.
4. The setback reduction would not alter traffic patterns or volumes along adjacent
streets, including Douglass Road, and would not impose an undue burden on the surrounding street
network as the proposed setbacks are for the physical location of the structure, rather than traffic
generating land uses, and would not have any impact on vehicular circulation or traffic.
5. The project would comply with all applicable building, fire, and safety codes.
Therefore, the setback reduction would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare,
nor materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentation, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that
negate the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it
considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all
evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, pursuant to the above findings, the Planning
Commission does hereby approve the Minor Conditional Use Permit, in the form presented at this
meeting, contingent upon and subject to (1) the adoption of resolutions to approve a Final Site Plan
to construct a seven -story, 1,840-stall parking structure, a Minor Amendment to the OCVIBE
Master Site Plan to reflect the changes, and an Amendment to the Minor Conditional Use Permit
to update the OCVIBE Mural Plan; and (2) the condition of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary
prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general
welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon compliance with each and
all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction,
then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
- 4 - PC2025-038
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
November 17, 2025. ,
CHAIP�& .RSON, PLANTJPG COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANA EIM
ATTES
SEC I°AR , LANYING COMMISSION
OF TH TY OF A. AHEIM
- 5 - PC2025-038
EXHIBIT "A"
PROPERTY
232-071-02LILL
232-071-03
E KATELLA AVE
0 75 is)
MFeetm
Source: Recorded Tract Maps and/or City GIS.
Please note the accuracy is +/- two to rive feet.
EXHIBIT "B"
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
NO.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
REVIEW
BY
1
The premises shall be developed substantially in accordance
Planning and
with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim
Building
by the applicant, which plans are on file with the Planning
Department,
Department, and as conditioned herein.
Planning Services
Division
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Bridgette Bambrick, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim held on November 17, 2025, by the following vote of the
members thereof:
AYES: Commissioners Abdulrahman, Castro, Kelly, Lieberman, Perez, Tran-Martin, and
Walker.
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto s y h• this 17th day of November 2025.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM