Loading...
02/24/2026ANAHEIM CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 24, 2026 The regular meeting of February 24, 2026 was called to order at 4:00 P.M. in the Council Chamber of Anaheim City Hall, located at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard. The meeting notice, agenda, and related material were duly posted on February 19, 2026. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ashleigh E. Aitken and Council Members Carlos A. Leon, Ryan Balius, Natalie Rubalcava, Norma Campos Kurtz, Kristen M. Maahs, and Natalie Meeks. STAFF PRESENT: Assistant City Manager Greg Garcia, City Attorney Robert Fabela, and City Clerk Theresa Bass ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSION: None PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS: None CLOSED SESSION: At 4:01 p.m., Mayor Aitken recessed to Closed Session for consideration of the following: 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of California Government Code Section 54956.9): One potential case 2. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT (Subdivision (b)(1) of Section 54957 of the California Government Code) Title: Interim City Manager 3. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Subdivision (a) of Section 54957.6 of the California Government Code) Agency Designated Representative: Linda Andal, Human Resources Director Title: Interim City Manager At 5:00 p.m., Mayor Aitken reconvened the Anaheim City Council. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ashleigh E. Aitken and Council Members Carlos A. Leon, Ryan Balius. Natalie Rubalcava, Norma Campos Kurtz, Kristen M. Maahs, and Natalie Meeks. INVOCATION: Reverend Dr. Joel Van Soelen, Anaheim Christian Reformed Church Prior to the Flag Salute, Council Member Maahs took a moment to recognize the men and women who have served the country. FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Kristen M. Maahs PRESENTATIONS: Recognizing Cypress College Foundation's 515t Americana Awards Honorees Mayor Aitken recognized Cypress College Foundation's Americana Awards Citizens of the Year for Anaheim, Alden and Linda Esping. She shared that for more than 60 years, the Espings have poured their hearts into the City, bettering the lives of kids and families and strengthening Anaheim. She City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 2 of 33 noted that they are teachers, mentors, and a steady presence when students needed encouragement, guidance, or someone to believe in them. She stated that from 1963 to 2011, they both served as educators in the Anaheim Union High School District. She highlighted the impact that they've had over the five decades they taught. She shared that Mr. Esping's services extended from the Anaheim Family YMCA, the City's Planning Commission, Senior Citizen Commission, and Chamber of Commerce. She added that Mr. Esping has been honored as Ambassador of the Year by the Chamber, Orange County Teacher of the Year, and a Friend of Education. Mayor Aitken shared that Ms. Esping has served on the Library Board, advising and coaching through Kiwanis Bowl, and supporting groups such as Cop4Kids, Caterina's Club, the Tiger Woods Foundation and the Anaheim Community Foundation. She added that Ms. Esping was named South Junior High School Teacher of the Year and Kiwanis Bowl Coach of the Year. She noted that the Espings invested in the City and helped build generations. On behalf of the City, she recognized Alden and Linda Esping as the 51st Americana Citizens of the Year. Howard Kummerman, Executive Director of the Cypress College Foundation, noted that the event helps more than 7,000 students who attend Cypress College from the City. He added that the Foundation gives away nearly $1,000,000 in proceeds to the students. He explained that the efforts are due to citizens like the Espings who make a difference. He announced that the event will be held on March 21st. He presented Mayor Aitken with a copy of a 50t" Anniversary book for her and the Library Recognizing Chain Reaction Music Venue for operating in the City of Anaheim for nearly 30 years Mayor Aitken reported that for nearly 30 years, Chain Reaction was an all -ages place for live music, especially for young fans, without many places to go. She shared that Chain Reaction was a subcultural icon, hosting up-and-coming punk, emo, and other alternative bands, including early shows for Fall Out Boy, Paramore, and My Chemical Romance. She added that Chain Reaction gave bands an opportunity to be heard long before gaining widespread recognition and gave fans an opportunity to watch their first show. She noted that the venue created a sense of belonging in a space that welcomed young people exactly as they were and rising artists, a place to connect directly with the audience. She shared that Chain Reaction's closure reflects an increasingly challenging environment for small music venues. She recognized the cultural and community impact Chain Reaction had in Anaheim. She shared that Chain Reaction will forever be part of the City's live music history. She thanked Council Member Maahs for bringing the recognition forward. She invited Andy Serrao to accept the recognition and thanked Chain Reaction for nearly 30 years of dedication to live music in the community. Andy Serrao expressed appreciation to the City for its longstanding support of the venue, noting the venue's role as a safe community space for generations of artists and fans to discover and support the arts. He highlighted various City departments' assistance, including Planning, Police, and Fire, in helping sustain the venue and its programming. He thanked the City for its partnership and support. ACCEPTANCE OF OTHER RECOGNITIONS To be )resented at a later date : Recognizing February 22-28, 2026, as National Engineers Week At 5:12 p.m., Mayor Aitken called to order the Anaheim Housing Authority, in joint session with the City Council. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDAS: None City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 3 of 33 PUBLIC COMMENTS {all agenda items, except public hearings) Prior to receipt of public comments, City Clerk Theresa Bass provided an outline of procedures for public comments, notice of translation services, and a brief decorum statement. City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that a total of 72 public comments were received electronically prior to 3:00 P.M. [A final total of 79 public comments were received electronically, distributed to the City Council, and made part of the official records]. — See Appendix. R. Joshua Collins addressed the City Council regarding homelessness and affordable housing. He emphasized the need for additional affordable housing units and expand shelter options to address homelessness in the community. He urged the City to prioritize basic needs for vulnerable residents He urged the City to consider implementing income -based fines to help prevent homelessness and expand support and outreach services for unhoused individuals. He encouraged continued action and collaboration for affordable housing in the Maxwell Park area. Paul Hyek shared information regarding a potential program being developed by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that would allow individuals with rent -to -own vouchers to purchase homes obtained through foreclosures. He reported that there are State laws regulating e- bike use and sales to underage riders. He requested assistance from the City Council to coordinate with the GardenWalk and the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) to allow bus drivers to use restroom facilities before 10 a.m. due to construction at Disneyland. Janis Heckel, Executive Director of the Anaheim Community Foundation, expressed gratitude on behalf of the Anaheim Community Foundation Board of Directors, for the consideration of the Lease Agreement for the property located at 883 S. Anaheim Boulevard. She shared that the City Council's support represents an investment in people, partnerships, and hope for residents across Anaheim. She added that property would serve as a hub where organizations meet, share resources, build partnerships, and develop innovative solutions to support Anaheim residents. She shared that the Foundation is excited about restoring the spirit of the Anaheim Hive, which closed due to redevelopment. She added that the Foundation would host an open house to welcome new neighbors, community partners, and the public. She thanked the City Council for their leadership and commitment to the community. Orailia Felix provided an update on the work Disney has been doing in the Anaheim community and at the Disneyland Resort. She reported that on February 3rd, the Disneyland Resort surprised the Anaheim Track team with two one -day park hopper tickets to enjoy the theme parks during the summer. She shared that Mickey Mouse joined for a special appearance with the team. She added that the Disneyland Resort engages with workforce development efforts with Anaheim youth each month during the school year. She noted that volunteers from Disneyland Resort host five workshops supporting career readiness for nearly 350 students from four different high schools in Anaheim, including Loara, Savanna, Magnolia, and Anaheim High Schools. She shared that the workshops are offered in collaboration with Big Brothers/Big Sisters of Orange County and Orange County United Way to provide one-on-one mentoring opportunities for students and career development skills. She shared that the Resort recently held the Run Disney 5K and Half Marathon races. She added that Disney worked with Big Brothers/Big Sisters of Orange County raising $50,000 for a charity for the race to continue their work supporting youth in Anaheim. She highlighted the conclusion of the Lunar New Year Festival. She added that Napa Rose, recently completed an extensive renovation and welcomed guests with a reimagined space and new menu. She reported that the Disney California Food and Wine Festival would return March 5 to April 27, 2026. Hillary Lacher invited the Mayor, City Council, and community to attend the 150th celebration honoring E. Kate Rea on Saturday, March 21St from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m. She shared that Ms. Rea was an educator City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 4 of 33 and civic leader whose dedication shaped the Anaheim community. She noted that Ms. Rea served as the first chairwoman of the Anaheim Library Board and remained a member for 4 years. She added that Ms. Rea helped establish the City's first Parent Teacher Association (PTA) and highlighted her service as a charter member of the Ebell Club of Anaheim. She noted that Ms. Rea along with her sister Ella, inspired the naming of Katella Avenue. Mark Richard Daniels shared that a petition is circulating for the November General Municipal Election ballot for the City to adopt rent control. He encouraged the City Council to be proactive and adopt an ordinance implementing rent control. Jocelyn Pacheco addressed the City Council regarding the officer -involved shooting of Albert Arzola and called for greater transparency and accountability from the Anaheim Police Department. She urged the City to release the name of the officer involved, the unedited body camera footage, and the autopsy report. She expressed concern about transparency, public trust, and police accountability. Leslie Lopez expressed concerns regarding the circumstances of the officer -involved shooting of Albert Arzola. She criticized the response of the Anaheim Police Department. She questioned public statements made on the incident and the justification for the use of force according to Police Department policy. Grace Arzola expressed concerns about the Police Department's response to the shooting of Albert Arzola. She criticized the communication with the family and community and the information provided to the neighborhood on the incident. She called for transparency, accountability, and the release of the body camera footage of the incident. She raised concerns regarding accessibility accommodations and compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) at Council meetings. Sergio Pelayo called for justice and accountability for the death of Albert Arzola. He questioned the use of force used and the response time for medical assistance. He expressed concern that another family member was placed in danger during the incident. He reflected on Albert's character and the emotional toll that the loss has had on the family. Cecil Jordan Corkern expressed concerns regarding Disney content and imagery and questioned City involvement with Disney. He shared that he would compile and submit information to the Police Department for review and investigation. He emphasized the importance of protecting children and addressing community safety concerns. Ruben Greg Soto shared his personal experience with law enforcement and homelessness. He expressed frustration regarding social services and support for vulnerable individuals. He called for greater assistance for people experiencing homelessness and hardships. Rosie Camacho addressed the City Council regarding the death of her son, Alberto Arzola. She called for greater transparency, an independent investigation, and stronger oversight of the Police Department. She noted that the upcoming election would allow residents to evaluate the City Council's leadership. She urged the City Council to ensure accountability for the officer -involved shooting and to restore public trust. Mike Robbins criticized the influence of special interests and campaign contributions in elections. He expressed concern about governance, fiscal priorities, and public accountability in the City. He urged the City Council to prioritize the needs of residents, address public safety and policing concerns, and ensure accountability in decision -making outside of special interests. G. Price raised concerns regarding wildfire evacuation planning related to the proposed Festival project. She emphasized the importance of accounting for individuals evacuating from outside the City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 5 of 33 evacuation zone. She stated that the current evacuation study did not account for those individuals and urged the City Council to delay any project approvals until a complete evacuation model is completed and related data is publicly released to ensure safety and transparency. Andrew Winger expressed support for the Arzola family. He expressed concern regarding the proposed Festival project and its location in a Very -High Fire Hazard Zone. He questioned the project's evacuation planning, parking impacts, and residential density. He expressed concern over the Know Your Way evacuation plan and evacuation times based on ideal human behaviors during evacuation conditions. He urged the City Council to prioritize public safety, transparency, and alternative locations for the development. David Pulido demanded justice for the death of Albert Arzola. He called for the release of the unedited body camera footage, autopsy report, and the name of the officer involved in the shooting. He expressed concerns regarding police accountability and criticized investigative processes involving officer -involved incidents, stating that investigations often result in findings that officers did not violate criminal laws or departmental policies. He called for independent oversight, greater transparency, and representation of the public's interests. Art Castillo shared his community involvement in Anaheim since he was a teenager. He expressed concerns regarding community -police relations, racial bias, and retaliation. He encouraged City officials to engage directly with residents in neighborhoods. He requested accountability and collaboration to address community concerns. Mazatl Tepehyolotzin expressed support for transparency and accountability regarding the death of Albert Arzola. He called for the release of the officer's identity. He discussed Native American and Chicano cultural representation in Anaheim, including appreciation for community mural projects. He shared his personal experience growing up in neighborhoods and expressed concerns regarding cultural representation. He highlighted the native plant landscaping being installed near the OCVIBE project. He requested increased Native American representation at public sites and community spaces. John Baca, representative for the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), addressed the Council regarding ongoing contract negotiations involving IBEW employees. He emphasized the importance of ensuring the Union's concerns are clearly communicated to the Council and expressed a desire to reach a contract resolution so the City can focus on other community issues. Sophia Sosa addressed public health concerns regarding Disneyland fireworks. She shared that while the fireworks are an Anaheim staple, she noted long-term threats to residents and the local environment due to perchlorate exposure and aerial shells. She explained that the chemicals settle into the waterways, backyards, and the body during respiration. She cited the National Institute of Health's report regarding the health impacts of perchlorate exposure. She requested that the Council implement policies that require Disneyland to transition into low -emission alternatives such as drone shows or LED technology. Brian Olson commented on ongoing labor negotiations for City linemen. He noted the risks associated with maintaining high -voltage power lines and emphasized concerns regarding the expired labor contract. He noted financial uncertainty the employees experience until a new contract is negotiated. He requested improved communication between the negotiating parties for the Council to ensure employee concerns are accurately understood and the urgency to finalize a contract. David Aguon addressed the City Council regarding ongoing IBEW labor negotiations. He highlighted the essential role that utility employees have in maintaining electric and water services for the City He expressed concerns regarding the length of negotiations, employee retention and recruitment, City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 6 of 33 pension -related issues, and the bargaining process. He requested a timely resolution for contract negotiations and offered to discuss the matter with Council Members further. Vance Dizney expressed appreciation for the Council Members and acknowledged challenges facing the community. He shared ideas to promote infrastructure improvements and alternative currency concepts. Bryan Kaye addressed the City Council regarding public safety and interactions with the Police Department. He expressed concerns regarding police conduct and accountability. He referenced ongoing legal matters and urged accountability and improved decision -making. Marc Herbert stated that the Arzola family was still owed a dedicated community meeting regarding the officer -involved incident and expressed concerns about the format and outreach of prior public meetings. He mentioned future development at Angels Stadium and leadership from the City Council on the sale. He urged the inclusion of affordable housing. He requested greater transparency regarding the public posting of calendars of City executive staff. Pearl Arzola requested the release of the unedited body camera footage and the identities of the officers involved in the shooting of Albert Arzola. She raised concerns regarding human trafficking activities along Beach Boulevard and urged the City Council to prioritize enforcement and support services for affected youth. She expressed opposition to the proposed Festival project. Andrew shared his personal experiences with homelessness and interactions with law enforcement and service providers in Anaheim. He expressed concerns regarding the response to calls involving alleged threats, assaults, and requests for police assistance. He requested accountability from the Police Department. Christine Ediss addressed the City Council regarding the death of her nephew Albert Arzola. She shared that Albert loved the City, attended Anaheim public schools, and contributed to the City. She emphasized that the family's concerns are focused on accountability rather than opposition to law enforcement. She commented on the family's previous interactions with police officers. She called for transparency, accountability, and the release of the unedited body camera footage and autopsy report. Kenneth Batiste expressed concerns regarding accountability, public trust, and community safety. He called for the release of video footage for the officer -involved shooting with Albert Arzola. He shared concerns regarding wildfire risks associated with the proposed Festival development. He advocated for rent control measures and tenant protections in the City due to rising housing costs and displacement concerns. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS: Council Member Kurtz reported that in response to feedback from mobile food truck owners and their businesses on enforcement, City staff, herself, and Council Member Maahs worked to review regulation challenges and the concerns raised. She shared that meetings were held with vendors to look at options for flexibility while addressing current regulations and community needs and concerns. She explained that the City recognizes the concerns and the services provided by mobile food vendors, but also concerns raised about parking safety and health. She shared that the City must follow the Municipal Code, Orange County Health Care Agency regulations, and State law. She reported that after extensive efforts, staff was unable to find a workable option for the vendors that would allow them to continue their current operation practices without violating State and County health and safety standards. She stated that the City must return to regular enforcement of the Municipal Code. She shared that the Code Enforcement team would be working with vendors to City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 7 of 33 understand the permitting process and operational requirements. She noted that the goal is to educate before any resumed enforcement. She reported that the City celebrates and welcomes entrepreneurs and small businesses and offers a pathway to vendors. She thanked Council Member Maahs, City staff, and the vendors for their effort and creative thinking. She noted that the vendors would be receiving additional information on how to operate within the constraints of the Municipal Code and the County Health Code. She shared that the public can contact Code Enforcement or her and Council Member Maahs. Council Member Maahs thanked Anaheim Fire and Rescue for the fire safety and emergency preparedness meeting held on February 12'h at the Sunkist branch of the Anaheim Library. She expressed her appreciation for the residents who attended, for Anaheim Fire and Rescue for providing their expertise, the Library for hosting, and her team for sharing information on the meeting. She shared that participants had the opportunity to learn about disaster preparedness and the importance of a plan. She highlighted the importance of being prepared for a disaster. Council Member Maahs announced that she would be co -hosting, with the Sierra Club, a screening of the movie Join or Die, about civic life and community involvement. She shared that doors open at 5:30 p.m. and several local service clubs would be present to share ways for residents get involved and participate. Council Member Maahs requested to adjourn the meeting in memory of Dick Mosher. She shared that she had the privilege of knowing Mr. Mosher through his service and deep devotion to his family. She added that for 25 years, he read weekly to first -grade students at Betsy Ross Elementary School. She shared that for 37 years, he worked in the aerospace industry, starting as a forklift operator to logistics and contract management. She mentioned that in her last conversation with Mr Mosher, he spoke about his family and his wife of 68 years. She shared that he was a proud father, husband, grandfather, great-grandfather, and member of the Kiwanis Club for nearly 50 years. She extended her thoughts to his wife and the entire Mosher family. Council Member Rubalcava thanked and expressed her appreciation for everyone who participated during public comment, including the Arzola family. She shared that City Council has something for the family, in recognition of the City Council adjourning a previous meeting in memory of Albert Arzola. She mentioned that the Police Chief confirmed the release of the video footage soon, and an independent investigation was ongoing. She thanked IBEW for attending and shared that her father is a longtime member of IBEW. She acknowledged their comments and expressed hope that Human Resources is negotiating in good faith. Council Member Rubalcava highlighted the District 3 community Open House which included Code Enforcement, Public Utilities, the Police Department, Fire and Rescue, and the Housing and Community Development Department. She noted the many resources provided to the unhoused and recognized Deputy Director of Housing and Community Development Sandra Lozeau for her work. She thanked City staff for their work addressing issues and beautification efforts on Lincoln Avenue. She acknowledged the concerns from District 6 residents but acknowledged the need for housing across the City and City staff recommendations. Council Member Rubalcava highlighted the upcoming mural at Center Greens by Damin Lujan. She recognized the community and the Community Services Department's efforts on the project. She also recognized Mazatl, for his efforts to promote the inclusion of Native American culture in the mural. Council Member Rubalcava shared that she visited Price Elementary School as part of a reading initiative nationwide. She announced that it was an honor to read to second and third graders who live in District 3. She shared that she read a water -wise book for the students. Council Member Rubalcava requested to adjourn the meeting in memory of Anaheim Police Department Investigator Jaime Llamas after a long and courageous battle with terminal brain cancer. She shared that he passed away peacefully in his home, surrounded by his family. She highlighted his service to the community with dedication and professionalism since 2006. She shared that when a member of the Anaheim family passes, it impacts everyone and offered her prayers to his family. City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 8 of 33 Council Member Balius thanked the Public Works Department, including James from Traffic, for assisting during the recent storm and for a speedy recovery from the damages incurred. He recognized Anaheim Fire and Rescue Truck 6 for the hazmat truck orientation. Council Member Balius acknowledged the human trafficking concerns mentioned during public comments and encouraged individuals to call 911. He shared that new State laws provide flexibility for the Police to address the situation. Mayor Pro Tem Leon recognized Anaheim Public Utilities and their work installing brighter street lights on Brookhurst. He highlighted the benefits the street lights would have on the community. He thanked Public Works and Union Pacific for coordinating a railroad crossing. He noted that railroad crossings are typically replaced every 40 to 50 years and require extensive coordination. He shared that he was invited to celebrate Lunar New Year with UVSA (Union of Vietnamese Student Associations of Southern California) and Advance Beauty College. He highlighted the vibrant celebrations and pride amongst the community. Mayor Pro Tern Leon thanked the Community Services Department for hosting Youth in Government Day. He shared his participation while he was a student and highlighted the program's investment in students. He requested to adjourn the meeting in memory of Paul Joseph Schiada, an Anaheim Union High School District music and math teacher for more than 35 years, including many years at Magnolia High School. He highlighted his dedication to students and brought his passions for music and the arts to his work every day He shared that he is survived by his partner Vince and his siblings. CITY MANAGER'S UPDATE: Assistant City Manager Greg Garcia highlighted the completion of the most recent Community Open Houses. He stated he had the opportunity to attend the meetings and noted the high turnout and discussion on various topics including Rebuild Beach, parks, and public safety. Assistant City Manager Garcia shared that staff solicited high-level feedback and thoughts from residents regarding the Angel Stadium site and what they might want to see in the long term on that site. He reported that the stadium assessment is ongoing and he would continue to provide updates as appropriate moving forward. At 7:03 p.m., Mayor Aitken recessed the Anaheim City Council to address the Anaheim Housing Authority agenda, and reconvened at 7:04 p.m. CONSENT CALENDAR: The Consent Calendar was considered with Mayor Pro Tern Leon pulling Item Nos. 5 and 13 for separate consideration. MOTION: Council Member Maahs moved to waive reading of the resolutions and adopt the balance of the consent calendar as presented, in accordance with reports, certifications, and recommendations furnished each City Council Member, seconded by Council Member Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES — 0. Motion carried. B105 3. Receive and file minutes of the Library Board meeting of January 12, 2026, Parks and Recreation Commission meeting of December 3, 2025, and Public Utilities Board meeting of December 17, 2025. City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 9 of 33 D116 4. Approve certificates recognizing Janis Heckel on her retirement as Executive Director of the Anaheim Community Foundation; Brent Finlay on his retirement as Chief Executive Officer of the Anaheim YMCA; and Radiant Beer Co. on their 5th Anniversary. AGR-15850 6. Approve Master Agreement (MA) Contract No. 106-498964 with DMS Facility Services LLC, in AGR-15851 the amount of $616,440 and $489,900 for the first year, for landscape maintenance services for City parks in the North Central and Central service areas respectively, for a total first year not to exceed amount of $1,106,340, with up to four one-year optional renewals, for a total cumulative not to exceed amount of $5,531,700, plus annual renewal increases subject to Consumer Price Index (CPI), applicable taxes, and a 20% contingency for as -needed services; approve MA Contract No. 106-498965 with Parkwood Landscape Maintenance, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $1,021,548 for the first year, with up to four one-year optional renewals, for a cumulative not -to -exceed amount of $5,107,740, plus annual renewal increases subject to CPI, applicable taxes, and a 20% contingency for as -needed services, for landscape maintenance services for City parks in the East service area; authorize the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute all necessary contractual documents and exercise the renewal options in accordance with Invitation for Bids No. 9867A; and increase the Community Services Department Fiscal Year 2025/26 General Fund budget by $250,000 to cover the increase in landscape maintenance costs for the remainder of the fiscal year. AGR-15852 7 Approve Master Agreement Contract No. 106-498990 with Convergint Technologies LLC, in an amount not to exceed $440,038 in the first year and $54,821.30 annually thereafter, plus applicable taxes and fees, for a cumulative total amount not to exceed $714,144.50 and a 20% contingency, for the purchase of Milestone video management systems software and associated services for a term effective through February 18, 2029 with three one-year optional extensions; and authorize the Purchasing Agent to execute all contractual documents, in accordance with Cooperative Sourcewell Master Agreement No. 121024. AGR-15853 8• Approve Master Agreement Contract No. 106-498989 with Veterans Communication Services, Inc., in an annual amount not to exceed $80,241, for a one year period, with four one-year optional renewals, for a total amount not to exceed $401,205, plus applicable sales tax and a 20% contingency, for the removal, replacement and furnishing of security camera equipment and related services on an as -needed basis; and authorize the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute all contractual documents and renewal options, in accordance with Bid No. 9870. AGR-15854 9. Award a construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Asplundh Construction, LLC, in the amount of $2,102,980.50, plus a 10% contingency, for Electric Utility Relocation Project at Cerritos Avenue and Douglass Road; authorize the Director of Public Works, or designees, to execute the contract and any related documents, including any cost -neutral amendments of the contract and any contemplated by the contract, and to take such actions as are necessary, required, or advisable to implement and administer the contract; determine that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15301(b), 15302(c) and (d), and 15303 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; and authorize the Finance Director to execute the Escrow Agreement pertaining to contract retentions in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22300. City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 10 of 33 10. Approve the Close -Out Change Order with All American Asphalt, Inc., in the amount of $31,530.88, which includes settlement of any outstanding claims and extra work orders for the AGR-15155.0.1 Serrano Avenue Rehabilitation from the West City Limit to Weir Canyon Road Project; and authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the Change Order and to take such actions as are necessary or required to implement and administer the Change Order. 11 Approve the Second Amendment to Agreement with Carpi & Clay Inc., increasing the term by two additional one-year optional renewals, increasing the monthly compensation from $5,000 AGR-4729.D.2 to $5,500, and increasing the total not to exceed amount by $132,000 from $315,000 to $447,000, for federal advocacy services; and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to administer the agreement under the terms and conditions of the agreement. 12. Waive Council Policy 4.1 and approve a SaaS Subscription and Services Agreement with AGR-15855 Benevate, LLC, dba Neighborly Software, in an amount not to exceed $250,000, for grant management software for a term commencing February 14, 2026 and ending January 31, 2031; and designate the Director of Housing and Community Development, or designee, to as the certifying official authorized to execute the agreement and all documents related to the administration, management, and implementation of the agreement. 14. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-005 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Pilo CITY OF ANAHEIM vacating a portion of a Public Service Easement located at 7581 East Country Hill Lane pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code Section 8330, et seq. — Summary Vacation (ABA2025-00442). Authorize the City Clerk to hold the recordation of the Resolution in the Orange County Recorder's office until directed by the Public Works Director or designee. 15. RESOLUTION NO. _ 2026-006 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE D154.1 CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting a Memorandum of Understanding establishing terms and D154.2 conditions of employment including modification of pay policies, creating, deleting, and/or D154.8 modifying certain classifications for employees in classifications represented by the Anaheim Municipal Employees Association, General Employees and superseding Resolution Nos. 2022-136 and 2025-006. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-007 _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting a Memorandum of Understanding establishing terms and conditions of employment including modification of pay policies, creating, deleting, and/or modifying certain classifications for employees in classifications represented by the Anaheim Municipal Employees Association, Clerical Employees and superseding Resolution Nos. 2022-137, 2025-007 and 2025-077. RESOLUTION NO. _ 2026-008 _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting a Memorandum of Understanding establishing terms and conditions of employment including modification of pay policies for employees in classifications represented by the Anaheim Municipal Employees Association, Part -Time Unit and superseding Resolution Nos. 2022-138, 2023-067, 2025-008, and 2025-078. Amend the Fiscal Year 2025/2026 budget by $9,579,846. City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 11 of 33 D114 16. Approve minutes of the City Council meeting of December 9, 2025. BUSINESS CALENDAR. D116 5. Receive and file, with the possibility of discussion, the list of Professional Services Agreements authorized by the City Manager and the list of Visit Anaheim Subcontractor Agreements approved by the Executive Director of Convention, Sports, and Entertainment for January 2026. DISCUSSION: Mayor Pro Tern Leon requested clarification regarding the Tourism Economics agreement and whether the agreement included multiple agreements and the evaluation process for aggregate contract thresholds. He also requested clarification on the City's contract approval process for Council review and approval. Executive Director of Convention, Sports and Entertainment Tom Morton clarified that any subcontract exceeding $150,000, whether individually or in an aggregate amount, is subject to review and approval by the City. Christina Dawson with Visit Anaheim explained that the Tourism Economics contract includes multiple agreements affiliated with Tourism Economics. She stated that although the Tourism Economics agreement was for $92,500, the combined value of the related agreements exceeded the $150,000 aggregate, which triggered the additional approval. She explained that the related agreements were disclosed to ensure transparency regarding the total contract amounts and associated services. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Leon, Ms. Dawson clarified that the agreement are affiliated with the same company; however, each contract includes a distinct scope of work. She noted that each individual agreement and scope of work is available and could be provided for City Council review. She confirmed each agreement includes a different set of deliverables. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Leon moved to receive and file, with the possibility of discussion, the list of Professional Services Agreements authorized by the City Manager and the list of Visit Anaheim Subcontractor Agreements approved by the Executive Director of Convention, Sports, and Entertainment for January 2026, seconded by Council Member Kurtz. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES - 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES — 0. Motion carried. AGR-15856 13. Approve an agreement with Eagle Systems International, Inc., dba Synergy Companies, at an annual cost not to exceed $1,395,220 (initial -term aggregate equals $6,970,000), plus a 10% contingency for as -needed extra services, for energy and water efficiency residential programs and direct installation services for an initial five year and up to two one-year optional extensions; and authorize the Public Utilities General Manager, or designees, to execute the agreement and all related or implementing documents, including any cost -neutral amendments, assignments, and documents contemplated by the agreement, and to take actions necessary to implement and administer the agreement. Public Utilities General Manager Dukku Lee reported that the agreements would continue two home efficiency services that have been well -received by customers. He shared that the Home Utility Check -Up Program provides a no -cost, in -home assessment that includes a detailed bill analysis and recommendations on ways to improve specific household electricity and water usage. He reported City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 12 of 33 that the Dusk -to -Dawn Lighting Program provides single-family and multi -family electric customers with high -efficiency exterior security light fixtures, which aims to improve neighborhood safety and energy efficiency. He stated that in July 2025, a Request for Proposals (RFP) was issued, resulting in two submissions that were evaluated based on Council Policy 4.1. He reported that the highest- ranking firm was not recommended for approval due to their pricing proposal, which was 30% higher than that of the second -ranked firm. General Manager Lee stated that Synergy Companies' proposal met the scope of work and offered the lowest -cost proposal. He noted that the company has performed similar work with other utilities, including Southern California Edison, San Diego Gas & Electric, Riverside Public Utilities, and Colton Electric Utility. He added that the proposed agreement term is five years with two optional one-year extensions with payments based on actual participation levels. He noted that the funding is not from the General Fund. He reported that electric utilities are required by State legislation to allocate funds from electric rates for energy efficiency and low-income programs established during energy deregulation in the late 1990's. He added that water measures are separately funded from the water utility and would help meet Statewide drought mitigation regulations. DISCUSSION: In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, General Manager Lee confirmed Synergy Companies was the City's current vendor. He reported that the current agreement term concluded, which required an RFP. He shared that residents can call the Public Utilities Department or 3-1-1 or use Anaheim Anytime for any questions. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Leon moved to approve an agreement with Eagle Systems International, Inc., dba Synergy Companies, at an annual cost not to exceed $1,395,220 (initial -term aggregate equals $6,970,000), plus a 10% contingency for as -needed extra services, for energy and water efficiency residential programs and direct installation services for an initial five year and up to two one-year optional extensions; and authorize the Public Utilities General Manager, or designees, to execute the agreement and all related or implementing documents, including any cost -neutral amendments, assignments, and documents contemplated by the agreement, and to take actions necessary to implement and administer the agreement, seconded by Council Member Balius. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES - 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES — 0. Motion carried. D150 17. Receive a presentation regarding program updates and funding needs of the Contigo program offered by the Community Services Department and provide direction to staff as needed. Director of Community Services Sjany Larson -Cash reported that at the February 3rd Council meeting, Council Member Kurtz requested an update on the Contigo program, and Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested that staff explore options to expand funding. She stated that funding for the program, in the amount of $250,000, was approved in July 2025 to assist Anaheim residents affected by immigration enforcement activities with emergency grant funding for rent, utilities, or miscellaneous expenses. Chief Communications Officer Mike Lyster recognized Communications Specialist Natalie Aguirre for her role with the Contigo Program. He reported that Anaheim Contigo launched June 17, 2025, in response to the challenge and disruption due to federal immigration enforcement. He stated that it consists of three key areas, including timely updates on enforcement activity or suspicion of activity, legal referrals, and emergency assistance grants. He shared that since June, the Communications team has responded to over 100 incidents or potential incidents to detail the circumstances or dispel speculation or inaccurate information. He displayed an image of the City's website with current City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 13 of 33 updates. He noted the importance of the updates and accuracy of the information. He shared that following enforcement events in Minneapolis, there has been targeted enforcement activity. He added that there have not been any confirmed activities in the City over the past two weeks and no roving enforcement since late January. He noted that the activity can change at any time. He urged the public to seek reliable information on the City's website and other trusted sources. Chief Communications Officer reported that extensive information and resources on the City's website. He stated that the information includes what to do in the first 24 hours if someone is detained, the Contigo leaflet, information for workplaces, how to avoid legal scams, and an overview of how federal immigration enforcement works and how to distinguish it from the Police Department and other local law enforcement. He shared that the website also includes an overview of Anaheim Police operations. He added that links to the Mexican consulate, Representative Lou Correa's office, Orange County Rapid Response, and other agencies are included on the website, as well as a list of nonprofit legal referrals available for the community. Neighborhood Services Manager Joe Perez reported any Anaheim resident in need of assistance can contact the City at any of the three Family Resource Centers located throughout the City. He shared that the bilingual case managers continue to meet with clients in person, over the phone, and virtually to conduct client intake and assessments that determine program eligibility. He reported that qualifications to participate include residency in the City, low-income household designation, and the ability to demonstrate an immediate emergency need due to immigration enforcement. He added that eligible clients qualify for up to $1,000 for rent or up to $500 for all other household expenses. Neighborhood Services Manager Perez reported that the City Council authorized $250,000 in grant funds to provide economic relief to residents impacted by immigration enforcement in the community. He shared that the City has assisted 331 Anaheim families through the programs, in partnership with the Anaheim Community Foundation. He stated that approximately $213,000 in emergency grant funds have been distributed to creditors to help pay for rent, utilities, and other miscellaneous expenses. He reported that the remaining $36,000 will be expended in two to three months based on current service level demand. He shared that no case is typical, with rental assistance being the highest priority and largest monthly expense for clients. He noted that funds for rental assistance have come from the Housing Trust Fund and all other expenses from the City's General Fund. He reported that all other family needs identified outside of the Contigo fund are referred to community, faith, education, and nonprofit agencies to address gaps in support that are needed to help stabilize home environments. He shared that based on client eligibility, case managers match the needs to available resources that include access to food, medical, health support, information and referrals for other support services. Neighborhood Services Manager Perez relayed a message of gratitude from clients for the support; however, he noted challenges with funding limitations. He shared that the financial support concerns stem from the high cost of rent, utilities, and other household expenses. He stated that case managers noted rents owed range from $1,900 to $3,100 monthly. He reported that short-term assistance provides up to 30 days of temporary relief for each case, only allowing a slight pause and regrouping for families. He added that the current model does not allow for assistance with legal expenses. He shared that the Contigo program provides much -needed assistance and temporary relief to families to address present and ever -changing needs. Chief Communications Officer Lyster shared that legal assistance was contemplated when Contigo was formed. He stated that the City approached the Anaheim Community Foundation, which welcomed the opportunity to provide the assistance; however, they noted that they did not have prior experience providing legal assistance. He reported that the City approached the Public Law Center and Orange County Justice Fund as referral partners. He added that since the program's inception, City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 14 of 33 the Mexican Consulate in Santa Ana and UCI Law are other trusted referral options. He stated that CHIRLA has created a legal concentration consultation service, once a week by appointment. DISCUSSION: Council Member Kurtz thanked City staff and resource center teams for their work supporting the community, particularly during the early stages of emergency response efforts. She acknowledged the dedication, communication, and patience demonstrated by staff in assisting residents during a challenging period. She thanked Ms. Aguirre and Neighborhood Services Manager Perez for their dedication to the program and responding to the community's concerns and needs. She inquired about the service level demands for the program. Neighborhood Services Manager Perez stated that community service requests and calls for assistance fluctuate based on activity and enforcement efforts occurring within the community. He noted that there is no typical pattern for service demand but emphasized that staff remain available to respond to calls and provide assistance as needed. In response to Council Member Kurtz, Director Larson -Cash explained that City Council previously approved and allocated $250,000. She stated that rental -related assistance were funded through the Housing Trust Fund, while miscellaneous expenses associated with the program were funded through the General Fund. Assistant City Manager Garcia added that Council's direction allowed staff the ability to use both funds, based on requests, and evaluate which fund to use. He explained that an amount was not determined from either fund. Council Member Kurtz requested clarification on the emergency assistance funding set aside when the Housing Trust Fund was established. Assistant City Manager Garcia stated that $1 million was set aside for emergency assistance. Council Member Kurtz stated that $1,000 in rental assistance based on average rental amounts may not be enough support. Council Member Rubalcava thanked Chief Communications Officer Lyster for responding to enforcement activity and efforts to respond. She inquired how assistance is determined, whether requests for assistance were declining based on activity, and how staff verify that assistance is being provided to individuals impacted by activity. Neighborhood Services Manager Perez explained that assistance requests are reviewed through a vetting process conducted by case managers, beginning with a client intake and profile. He shared that eligibility requirements include verification of Anaheim residency, income verification using the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) guidelines to confirm low- to moderate - income status, and a self -attestation describing how the individual has been directly impacted by enforcement activity. In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Neighborhood Services Manager Perez stated that some individuals inquire about available assistance funds but do not qualify under the program requirements. He reported that if possible, staff have provided support through other emergency assistance funds administered through the Anaheim Community Foundation, including assistance programs established prior to Contigo and emergency assistance funds designated for older adults ages 55 and older. Council Member Rubalcava expressed appreciation for staff's efforts in exploring a legal defense City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 15 of 33 fund and noted ongoing coordination with legal organizations and nonprofits serving impacted residents. She referenced concerns regarding expedited deportation processes and reduced due process protections, which may increase family separations, and asked whether staff are seeing requests for legal defense assistance or primarily requests related to housing and day-to-day support services. Neighborhood Services Manager Perez stated that some clients have requested assistance with legal fees related to immigration matters, but the program is limited in the assistance it can provide and generally refers individuals to partner agencies and legal service organizations. He noted that clients have shared that legal fees are estimated between $20,000 and $35,000 and acknowledged a growing need for legal support services. In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Chief Communications Officer Lyster reported that the City have received general requests to consider a legal defense fund but not specific requests from nonprofits. Council Member Balius requested clarification regarding Council's direction on the funding source for the assistance. Director Larson -Cash clarified that several options were considered for funding. She reported that Council directed staff to evaluate the most appropriate funding sources with the least operational disruption, as it was not yet clear how much could be allocated from the Housing Trust Fund versus the General Fund. She noted that subsequent updates and memos have been provided to Council regarding the number of individuals served, funding sources, and services being provided. In response to Council Member Balius, Assistant City Manager Garcia explained that Council direction was to evaluate both funding sources and find ways to use funds from the Housing Trust Fund as much as possible and the General Fund when needed. Mayor Pro Tern Leon commended staff and community partners for establishing the Anaheim Contigo program and supporting residents during federal immigration enforcement activity, noting that the City acted in alignment with its values by providing outreach, communication, and assistance during a period of fear and uncertainty in the community. He thanked staff, particularly the Communications team, and partners for helping residents feel informed and supported and asked about the remaining program balance, clarification on the reported funding amounts, and the process for bringing a request to replenish program funds back to the council for consideration. Assistant City Manager Garcia stated that approximately $36,000 remains in the program fund balance, which is anticipated to support the program for at least the next couple of months, depending on the volume of requests received. He noted that Council could consider replenishing the funds from both the General Fund and the Housing Trust Fund and could provide additional direction regarding the desired allocation amounts from each funding source moving forward. City Attorney Fabela recommended that a request for additional funding be agendized for further discussion, in compliance with the Brown Act. Mayor Pro Tern Leon expressed support for bringing back a discussion on replenishing program funds and cautioned against interpreting the recent decline in enforcement activity as an indication that community needs have ended, noting that enforcement activity tends to occur in cycles and could increase again at any time. He emphasized the importance of maintaining available assistance funds proactively to avoid leaving families without support during future enforcement surges. He also expressed interest in exploring a legal defense component within the Contigo program and asked City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 16 of 33 whether staff have recently engaged with legal service organizations regarding their current capacity, the timeliness of legal assistance being provided to referred residents, and whether individuals are being placed on waitlists for services. Assistant City Manager Garcia reported that staff have reached out to ten nonprofit organizations that provide immigration defense and other cities with similar programs. He explained that legal defense services generally fall into three categories: legal consultation and guidance, immediate petitions related to detainment, and longer -term legal representation. He indicated that additional time would be needed to further evaluate options, gather proposals from organizations, and determine whether to pursue a formal request for proposals process. Chief Communications Officer Lyster noted that the current level of immigration enforcement activity is unprecedented compared to prior periods and stated that nonprofit legal service providers are experiencing significantly increased demand for assistance, resulting in capacity constraints and limited availability of services. Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested that staff return with proposals outlining potential legal defense fund options for the Anaheim Contigo program, including possible partnerships with nonprofit organizations already providing immigration legal services in Orange County and examples of programs implemented by other cities. He also expressed interest in reviewing options for replenishing Contigo program funding, noting that recent declines in enforcement activity may only be temporary and that the city should remain prepared to respond to future community needs. Council Member Kurtz expressed support for Mayor Pro Tem Leon's request. She noted that residents often need quick information about available resources and procedures after a family member or neighbor is detained. She also raised concerns about individuals being taken advantage of by private attorneys charging excessive legal fees and stated that partnerships with nonprofit organizations could help connect residents with trusted information and referrals for additional legal support if needed. Council Member Maahs thanked staff for their work supporting the Anaheim Contigo program, specifically recognizing Ms. Aguirre's and Chief Communications Officer Lyster's efforts to assist residents directly and provide timely and accurate information to the community. She asked staff what the average amount of financial assistance being provided per family was through the program. Neighborhood Services Manager Perez reported that the assistance is $1,000 for rent and up to $500 for other expenses for each family. In response to Council Member Maahs, Neighborhood Services Manager Perez confirmed that families are utilizing the full assistance amounts. In response to Council Member Maahs, Director Larson -Cash stated that the Anaheim Community Foundation would welcome and accept private donations to support the Anaheim Contigo program and noted that some outside donations had already been received at the start of the program. She added that any continued donations would be set aside specifically for program assistance efforts. Council Member Maahs expressed concern with full representation and potential limits it may impose to serve fewer individuals. She expressed interest in exploring available options. Council Member Rubalcava expressed concern regarding the funding source used for the Anaheim Contigo program, stating that the Council's prior direction was for the initial funding to come from Disneyland Forward funds rather than the General Fund, and requested staff review the prior Council City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 17 of 33 direction. She also expressed interest in identifying additional funding sources specifically to support families impacted by immigration detainment, including potential partnerships with other elected officials, local agencies, businesses, hotels, and private donors. She praised staff efforts related to community outreach, including Know Your Rights materials, family resource center services, and public safety outreach, and acknowledged partnerships with local, county, and federal officials supporting immigrant communities. She highlighted Congressman Lou Correa's efforts in partnering with the City and advocating for better support for individuals and funding. Mayor Aitken thanked staff for preparing the Anaheim Contigo program update and noted that the discussion was timely as the City approaches budget season and considers potential future funding allocations. She expressed interest in exploring additional legal clinic partnerships with organizations such as the Public Law Center and the Orange County Bar Association to expand community legal assistance opportunities. She also requested that staff circulate information to the Council regarding the original intended funding sources and the actual funding allocations used for the program, emphasizing the importance of maintaining clarity and alignment with prior council direction. Assistant City Manager Garcia thanked City staff for their continued work supporting the Anaheim Contigo program and assisting residents through the Family Resource Centers. He recognized the Communications team for providing around -the -clock community outreach and information and commended staff for quickly mobilizing resources and continuing to evolve the program to meet community needs. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Leon, City Attorney Fabela advised that further direction be given during the Council agenda setting. Informational item; no formal action taken by Council. D154 18. Discuss and provide direction to the Human Resources Director on the recruitment process for the position of the City Manager for the City of Anaheim. Director of Human Resources Linda Andal reported that staff has been asked to move forward with a nationwide recruitment for the vacant City Manager position and return with options to consider the structure of the process as outlined in the City Charter. She stated that the City Manager serves as the City's Chief Administrative Officer and is appointed and serves at the City Council's discretion. She highlighted the importance of the recruitment process reflecting the Council's priorities and consider professional best practices. She stated that the recruitment process should balance transparency, equity, deliberation, and candidate confidentiality. Director Andal reported that a typical executive recruitment takes three to five months from initiation to appointment, depending on outreach strategy, interview scheduling, background processes, and contract negotiations. She stated that staff recommends retaining a professional executive recruitment firm, which is standard practice for City Manager recruitments and supports broad outreach objective screening, and confidential engagement with highly qualified candidates. She shared that Council direction is requested on proceeding with the firm and preferred selection method. Director Andal reported that transparency in the process could be achieved through clear communication of the recruitment timeline, process milestones, and opportunities for input. She stated that confidentiality is critical to attracting experienced sitting executives and preserving a strong candidate pool. She noted that staff would structure the process to balance transparency and confidentiality consistent with Council direction. She shared that Council input on leadership qualities, City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 18 of 33 executive experience, management, philosophy, and community expectations would help shape the recruitment brochure and outreach strategy. She explained that it would ensure the process is guided by the Council's collective vision. She added that staff would facilitate meetings with the executive recruiter and Council to ensure all priorities are required. Director Andal reported that structured input opportunities could help inform the candidate profile and reinforce public confidence in the process. She explained that could be achieved through confidential surveys or small group sessions. She stated that staff seek Council direction on the level and format of stakeholder or community input. She reported that Council may choose a streamlined process with interviews conducted solely by the Council, consistent with previous City Manager recruitments. She shared that if advisory panels are preferred, staff could incorporate panels to provide structured feedback. She reported that staff would request Council direction to establish the panel's role as advisory and any additional Council direction. Director Andal concluded that staff seeks direction on the nationwide recruitment, use of an executive recruiter, timeline, candidate profile, priorities, and stakeholder involvement to allow Human Resources to move forward in alignment with the Council's expectations and best practices. DISCUSSION: In response to Mayor Aitken, Director Andal explained that a Request for Proposal (RFP) process for selecting an executive recruitment firm would be more time intensive, requiring development of a scope of work, a formal bidding process, review of proposals, and interviews with responding firms, with the process typically taking approximately 90 days. She noted that a Request for Information (RFI) process is generally faster and commonly used for executive recruitments, involving outreach to firms previously used by the City as well as firms that have expressed interest and shared their qualifications and experience. She added that an RFP process is more formal in nature. Mayor Aitken requested effective ways to involve the community in the process while maintaining confidentiality for the candidates. Director Andal recommended gathering community and business stakeholder input early in the recruitment process to help identify community priorities while maintaining candidate confidentiality. She noted that this approach had been used successfully in prior executive recruitments, including the recent police chief recruitment, and explained that the feedback would help shape the recruitment brochure and align the process with both community needs and Council priorities before the brochure is released. In response to Mayor Aitken, Director Andal reported the previous City Manager recruitment was held in 2017 for an appointment in 2018. Mayor Aitken requested information on whether the process included community stakeholder panels. Director Andal stated that the panel consisted of the City Council. Mayor Aitken emphasized the importance of conducting a thorough and deliberate recruitment process for the City Manager position, stating that selecting the right candidate is more important than completing the process quickly. She expressed support for either an RFP or RFI process, provided the City casts a wide net and works with executive recruitment firms that have strong reputations for attracting qualified candidates and proactively recruiting talent. She also suggested consulting similar cities and professional networks for recommendations on experienced executive search firms. She expressed interest in including community involvement while maintaining candidate confidentiality. She suggested including staff and department heads in the process. City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 19 of 33 Council Member Kurtz echoed Mayor Aitken's comments on not rushing the process. She stated that community involvement in the City Manager recruitment process should include residents, businesses, department heads, and labor unions due to their close working relationship with the City Manager's Office. She expressed a preference for an RFI process over an RFP, noting concern that an RFP could prioritize selecting the lowest -cost firm rather than the most experienced and reputable executive recruitment firm. She emphasized the importance of hiring a well -respected firm capable of attracting strong candidates and stated that while the City Council would make the final appointment decision, input from multiple stakeholder groups would be valuable throughout the process. In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Director Andal described the Police Chief recruitment process as beginning with an RFI process to select an executive recruitment firm specializing in police chief recruitments. She explained that after the firm was retained, the recruiter met individually with City Council Members, affected police department labor groups, department personnel, and department heads who regularly work with the Police Department. She added that staff also conducted several community meetings and attended all City Council district meetings to gather public input. She stated that the feedback collected through those efforts was then used to help shape the recruitment profile and process, which staff described as thorough and comprehensive. She reported that the process took 90 days from beginning to end. Council Member Rubalcava expressed support for using an RFI process for the City Manager recruitment due to the flexibility it provides and concerns that traditional bidding processes do not always result in selecting the best -qualified consultant. She also supported conducting a national search and praised the Police Chief recruitment process as thorough and professionally managed. She stated that community involvement should focus primarily on key stakeholders and organizational leadership rather than broad public vetting of candidates, noting that the City Manager's primary role is to lead the City organization and work closely with employees and the City Council. She suggested that select community leaders with strong knowledge of City operations could provide valuable input. She supported a comprehensive and deliberate recruitment process, opportunities for Council to provide input on the candidate profile, and involvement from department heads and labor unions in the process because of the close relationship with the City Manager. She also emphasized the importance of maintaining confidentiality and protecting the process from outside influence while ensuring the Council retains responsibility for selecting the next City Manager. Council Member Meeks expressed support for following a recruitment process similar to the recent Police Chief search, where interviews and outreach with labor unions, community members, stakeholders, and Council Members occurred prior to development of the recruitment brochure to help shape the candidate profile and attract the strongest applicants. She expressed support for using an RFI process, emphasizing that the qualifications and experience of the individual recruiter assigned to the project are more important than the name of the firm itself. She also supported the use of an executive advisory panel to assist Council in the selection process, while maintaining the City Council as the final decision -making authority. She stressed the importance of protecting the integrity and confidentiality of the process by limiting unofficial communications between candidates and Council Members outside the formal recruitment process. She encouraged staff to move forward with community meetings and issuance of the RFl while prioritizing quality throughout the recruitment effort. Director Andal requested clarification from the Council regarding the selection process for the executive search firm, specifically whether the Council wished to participate directly in selecting the firm through interviews and review of candidates, receive a shortlist of top firms from Human Resources, or delegate the selection authority entirely to Human Resources. City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 20 of 33 Mayor Aitken expressed interest in being informed about the executive search firm selected for the recruitment process, including the firm's experience working with California cities of similar size and scope. She also emphasized the importance of identifying the specific recruiter who would be assigned to conduct outreach and represent the city throughout the recruitment process. Director Andal confirmed that information regarding the executive search firms and their experience would be provided to the Council, noting that preliminary outreach and research on executive recruiters had already been conducted and that several firms demonstrated extensive experience with city manager recruitments. Council Member Meeks stated she was comfortable relying on the Human Resources Director's recommendation regarding selection of the executive search firm. In response to Mayor Aitken, City Attorney Fabela reported the item would not be eligible to be agendized under Closed Session. Council Member Rubalcava expressed support for deferring to Human Resources on the executive search firm selection process and stated confidence in staff's judgment. She suggested that staff provide the council with a list of firms that submitted RFIs along with the recommended firm and evaluation criteria when bringing forward a recommendation for council approval. Director Andal confirmed that would be the process moving forward. Council Member Kurtz expressed support. Mayor Pro Tern Leon support providing the information to Council and the importance of Council selecting the recruiting firm. Council Member Balius stated support for the RFI process and indicated comfort with staff presenting one or two recommended executive search firms for Council consideration. He emphasized the importance of prioritizing a quality recruitment process over speed and asked for clarification regarding stakeholder involvement, specifically whether the selected recruiter would identify and engage stakeholders to help shape the candidate profile and recruitment brochure before the position is advertised. Director Andal stated that, if directed by the Council, Human Resources could coordinate with the Assistant City Manager to identify and engage key stakeholders, including major business stakeholders, as part of the recruitment outreach and candidate profile development process. Council Member Balius expressed support for stakeholder input during the early stages of the recruitment process but raised concerns about stakeholder involvement during candidate interviews and final selection. He stated a preference for limiting participation at the interview stage, potentially allowing only minimal advisory involvement, such as a representative from the department heads, while maintaining the Council's primary role in the selection process. Director Andal explained that the only interview panel for the City Manager, in the past, has been the City Council. Council Member Balius emphasized the importance of receiving stakeholder and community input during the recruitment process while noting that the City Council, as the elected body, retains the responsibility and authority to make the final decision regarding the City Manager appointment. City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 21 of 33 Mayor Aitken echoed Council Member Balius' comments and agreed with incorporating community input early in the recruitment process and suggested utilizing City commissioners and other engaged community stakeholders to help provide feedback on the candidate profile and recruitment materials. She also noted the importance of allowing flexibility for the selected executive recruiter to recommend additional strategies or approaches based on their prior experience and best practices. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Director Andal explained that using an RFI process instead of an RFP would reduce the recruitment timeline by approximately two months. She noted that under the RFI process, the City would solicit responses from executive search firms outlining their proposed costs, scope of work, and experience conducting city manager recruitments. She clarified the RFI process would reduce the process by two months, compared to the formal RFP process. Mayor Pro Tern Leon acknowledged that the RFI process would shorten the recruitment timeline compared to an RFP and expressed support for the City Council selecting the final executive recruitment firm. He requested that firms' experience recruiting city managers for similarly sized cities, particularly cities undergoing transition or rebuilding public trust, be considered during evaluation. He supported stakeholder involvement in the process, suggesting that community and business stakeholders provide input through meetings with the recruiter rather than direct participation in candidate interviews. He suggested including community surveys or other low-cost public feedback opportunities to help shape the candidate profile. He also requested regular public progress updates at key milestones in the recruitment process, including selection of the recruitment firm, completion of the candidate profile, and advancement of the applicant pool, while maintaining appropriate confidentiality. He concluded by expressing confidence in the City's current leadership and staff to maintain organizational stability during the recruitment process. Director Andal stated that community surveys could be incorporated into the recruitment process, similar to the Police Chief recruitment, where QR-code-based surveys were administered by both the City's Public Information team and the executive recruiter. She noted that survey responses helped shape the recruitment brochure and informed interview questions during the selection process. She inquired whether Council preferred public meeting updates or regular informational memos to provide progress reports at key recruitment milestones. Mayor Pro Tern Leon confirmed both processes for updates on the recruitment process. In response to Council Member Maahs, Director Andal explained that if staff conducted an RFP, many of the executive firms that would respond to the RFP would be contacted through the RFI. Council Member Maahs expressed support for proceeding with an RFI process and supported incorporating community engagement opportunities through online surveys or a dedicated website. She also agreed that stakeholders should provide input during the recruitment process rather than serve in an advisory role for candidate selection. Council Member Rubalcava noted that additional clarification may be needed regarding stakeholder involvement in the recruitment process, as outlined in the staff memo. She explained that Council discussion generally supported involvement from labor groups, employees, and Council, while emphasizing that the City Council would continue to lead the process. She suggested that further discussion or future agenda consideration may be helpful to provide clearer direction on stakeholder participation, while recognizing that selecting the executive search firm remained the immediate priority. City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 22 of 33 Director Andal explained that stakeholder identification would be important later, with the executive recruiter conducting individual conversations, otherwise the discussion would be agendized for a public meeting. Council Member Rubalcava requested additional discussion regarding stakeholder involvement to ensure Council provides clear direction moving forward. She also raised questions regarding the structure of communication and oversight during the recruitment process, including identifying the appropriate point of contact for Council Members to ensure the process remains impartial and consistent with reporting protocols. She noted the importance of maintaining the integrity of the process, avoiding inappropriate influence, and ensuring staff direction occurs through the proper channels. Director Andal explained that, consistent with past practice, authority over the recruitment process would be delegated to the Human Resources Director to maintain the integrity and confidentiality of the process. She reported that the Human Resources Director would communicate directly with Council Members, and the executive recruiter would also be available to Council throughout the recruitment. She noted that if any inappropriate communications between candidates and Council Members were identified, the executive recruiter would address the issue directly with the candidate and remind them not to engage in those communications outside the formal process. Council Member Meeks expressed support for modeling the City Manager recruitment process after the recent Police Chief recruitment, noting that the process provided meaningful opportunities for input from labor groups, community members, and stakeholders through multiple in -person and virtual meetings with the recruiter. She stated that the process was efficient, took approximately a week and a half, and effectively gathered broad community feedback while keeping the recruitment moving forward. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Leon, Director Andal confirmed that the recruitment process would remain flexible and evolve in consultation with the selected executive recruiter. She noted that the recruiter would likely provide best practices, creative recruitment strategies, and insights based on prior executive recruitment experience to help attract the strongest candidates for the city manager position. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Leon, Director Andal stated that there appeared to be general Council consensus supporting stakeholder involvement, including business and community stakeholders, in the recruitment process. She proposed working with the Interim City Manager to identify stakeholder groups and coordinate outreach with Councilmembers and the selected executive recruiter. She indicated that sufficient direction had been provided to begin discussions with executive recruitment firms and asked Council for confirmation to proceed. In response to Mayor Aitken, City Attorney Fabela confirmed a motion was not required for the item, unless otherwise stated. He explained the discussion is for the benefit of the Human Resources Director to take the input provided by Council and move forward. In response to Council Member Balius, Director Andal stated that the current maximum salary for the City Manager position is approximately $404,000 and noted that, while competitive, the compensation may not fully reflect the complexity and scale of the city. She emphasized the importance of offering competitive compensation to attract highly qualified candidates given the City's size, operational complexity, labor relations, and stakeholder environment. She also noted that the ongoing Classification and Compensation Study conducted by Segel was nearing completion and that the first phase of the implementation plan, including a potential update to the City Manager salary range, was expected to be presented to Council at the March 24th meeting. City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 23 of 33 Council Member Balius emphasized the importance of offering competitive compensation in order to attract highly experienced and qualified candidates for the City Manager position and noted that salary considerations should be evaluated alongside the recruitment process. Mayor Aitken noted that the selected executive recruiter should provide comparative salary data from similarly situated cities nationwide prior to posting the position, in order to help Council evaluate whether the current compensation range for the City Manager position is appropriate or should be adjusted. Director Andal confirmed the recruiter would have information on compensation but would not conduct a salary study. She noted that Human Resources Department staff can conduct a study internally. Information item; no formal action taken by Council. D154 19. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-009 _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM for exception to the 180-day wait period in compliance with Government Codes 7522.56 and 21224 of the California Government Code (appointment of Dawn Hernandez, Senior Police Dispatcher, as a retired annuitant). Director Andal reported that the resolution for consideration is to waive the 180-day waiting period under the California Public Employees Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) and approve the appointment of Dawn Hernandez as a retired annuitant in the position of Senior Police Dispatcher. She stated that under PEPRA, a retired employee may return to work for up to 960 hours in a fiscal year, without impacting their retirement benefit, provided certain conditions are met and Council determines those findings. She explained the findings include certification that the appointment is to fill a critically needed position, the compensation remains within the approved salary range, and that no additional benefits are provided, no service credit is accrued, and that the appointment is approved by the governing body in a public meeting. She reported that Ms. Hernandez retired in December 2025 after 29 years of service as a Senior Police Dispatcher. She stated that dispatchers serve as the first point of contact in emergency situations and their quick ability to gather accurate information and deploy first responders is critical to public safety. She explained that there is an immediate need for an experienced dispatcher who can support dispatch operations and assist in training and mentoring new hires to maintain continuity of operations. She reported that approval of the resolution would authorize the appointment of Ms. Hernandez as a retired annuitant at the hourly rate of $52.11 for a period not to exceed 960 hours in the fiscal year, with no additional benefits and service credit. MOTION: Council Member Kurtz moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 1 2026-009 __ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM for exception to the 180-day wait period in compliance with Government Codes 7522.56 and 21224 of the California Government Code (appointment of Dawn Hernandez, Senior Police Dispatcher, as a retired annuitant), seconded by Council Member Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES — 0. Motion carried. City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 24 of 33 PUBLIC HEARINGS: AGR-1463 20. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 99-01 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED POINTE ANAHEIM INITIAL STUDY. MITIGATED DECLARATION, AND ADDENDA APPLICANT: GardenWalk Hotel II, LLC (assigned from GardenWalk Hotel I, LLC); 333 City Boulevard West, Suite 2000, Orange, CA 92868 and Westgate Resorts, Anaheim LLC; 5601 Windhover Drive, Orlando, FL 32819 PROJECT LOCATION: The property is located at 321 West Katella Avenue and 400 West Disney Way, between Disney Way and Katella Avenue, approximately 700 feet east of Harbor Boulevard. REQUEST: Pursuant to Resolution No. 82R-565, governing the consideration of development agreements, the City Council will consider establishing new development timeframes for GardenWalk Hotel II, LLC (assigned from GardenWalk Hotel I, LLC) and Westgate Resorts Anaheim, LLC to comply with Development Agreement No. 99-01. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City Council will consider whether to find and determine that the previously -approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Declaration and Addenda, serve as the appropriate environmental documentation for the request (continued from the Council meeting January 27, Public Hearing Item No. 16). RESOLUTION NO. 2026-010 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM establishing a performance time schedule for the commencement and completion of construction of Hotel 2 as set forth in the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 99-01 between the City of Anaheim and GardenWalk Hotel II, LLC, and determine that the previously approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), and associated addenda, are the appropriate environmental documentation for this request. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-011 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM establishing a performance time schedule for the commencement and completion of construction of Vacation Ownership Resort No. 1 as set forth in the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 99-01 between the City of Anaheim and Westgate Resorts Anaheim, LLC and determine that the previously approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), and associated addenda, are the appropriate environmental documentation for this request. Planning and Building Director Heather Allen reported that the item is a request from GardenWalk Hotel II, LLC and Westgate Resorts Anaheim, LLC to modify their respective performance timeframes associated with the GardenWalk Development Agreement. She stated that at the December 16th City Council meeting, the Council determined that both parties were not in compliance with their performance timeframes and directed staff to notice a public hearing to establish new time schedules for compliance. She noted that the public hearing was originally set for January 27, 2026 and continued to February 24 at the request of the applicants. Director Allen reported that in 1999, the City of Anaheim and Pointe Anaheim LLC, executed a Development Agreement for this Project. Following the execution of the Development Agreement, the original developer, Pointe Anaheim, LLC, assigned the Development Agreement to multiple responsible parties. She stated that STC GardenWalk, LLC was responsible for the retail, dining and entertainment component and the parking structure, all of which have been constructed. She reported that GardenWalk Hotel I and II, LLC are responsible for the development of two hotels; the JW City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 25 of 33 Marriott Anaheim Resort (466-rooms completed in August 2020) and a hotel at the northeast corner of the site along Disney Way. She shared that Westgate Resorts Anaheim, LLC is responsible for the vacation ownership resort component of the project, which would be constructed on top of the parking structure at the western portion of the site along Katella Avenue. Director Allen reported that the previous performance timeframe for GardenWalk Hotel II required construction to begin on the hotel by November 2025, which did not occur. She explained that GardenWalk Hotel II submitted a letter of request indicating that they were not able to meet the performance timeframe due to financial reasons, updates to the Building Code, and unexpected passing of a partner in their joint venture. She reported that they are requesting that the timeframes associated with the second hotel be extended five years to require construction to begin by November 2030, with construction completion by May 2033. She added that GardenWalk Hotel II has a proven track record for developing projects in The Anaheim Resort and are very familiar with the City's entitlement process. She noted that the proposed timeframe extension would allow for more than adequate time to develop plans for the City's review and for construction to be initiated. Director Allen stated that the previous performance timeframe for Westgate Resorts Anaheim required building permit issuance of the vacation ownership building by April 2025, which did not occur. She reported that Westgate Resorts Anaheim submitted a letter of request explaining that they previously secured an architect and hotel flag, but the deal with the development partner fell through. The developer is requesting that the timeframes associated with the vacation ownership component be modified to require construction to begin by October 2028 and finish construction by October 2030. She added that Westgate has indicated that it intends to market the entitled project to prospective investment partners and purchasers. She shared that Westgate believes that maintaining the Agreement will provide potential investors with greater certainty and predictability during any ownership transition, reduce regulatory risk, and enhance the overall marketability and feasibility of successfully delivering the project. Director Allen reported that staff current market conditions and would assist both parties in providing high -quality projects that would enhance the overall Resort area. She noted that the revised timeframes also place the construction commencement after the conclusion of the Olympics in 2028 and allow for staggered construction between the two projects. She added that the City Council may accept the staff recommendation or can direct staff to set a subsequent public hearing to modify or terminate the Development Agreement as to a specific party. DISCUSSION: Council Member concurred with staff's recommendation She stated that the property owner had expressed continued interest in developing the property but had been impacted by broader economic uncertainties, including tariffs and interest rates. She noted that the staff recommendation would provide flexibility and additional time for the owner to pursue a long-term development plan or potential sale of the property, and expressed support for staff's recommendation. Director Allen confirmed the action would occur via two separate votes following the public hearing. In response to Mayor Aitken, Director Allen confirmed the developer can return to Council to begin construction earlier than 2030, but no later than. She explained that the developer would need to submit a final site plan as the next step in the process, which would then proceed to building permits. She noted that the project could move forward at any time, provided construction begins by the required deadline. City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 26 of 33 Mayor Aitken inquired whether staff would maintain ongoing communication with the property owners during the extension period to identify any changes or opportunities for the City to help facilitate construction and remove potential obstacles. She expressed support for the long-standing family business and a desire to see the project move forward sooner rather than later. She inquired whether the entitlement was limited to vacation ownership/timeshare uses or if a future purchaser could instead develop a traditional hotel on the site. Director Allen explained the entitlement is not limited and the developer could build a regular hotel depending on the extent of the changes. She confirmed the developer is not required to build vacation ownerships. She noted that a concept in review with the development partner that did not move forward was to develop two hotels. At 8:52 p.m., Mayor Aitken opened the public hearing. Marc Herbert expressed concerns regarding the proposed project extension, questioning the lack of penalties for noncompliance with existing deadlines and whether alternative developers or uses for the property had been considered. He raised concerns about changing economic conditions and the long-term demand for hotel development and suggested the site could instead be reconsidered for affordable or mixed -use housing to help address the City's housing shortage. He encouraged the City to explore partnerships and alternative development concepts that could support workforce and affordable housing needs. City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that no electronic public comments were received related to Public Hearing Item No. 20. At 8:57 p.m., Mayor Aitken closed the public hearing. DISCUSSION: Council Member Rubalcava expressed support for staff's recommendation and clarified that the property is privately owned entitled land, not publicly owned or owned by Disney. She also noted that the site is not included in the City's Housing Element and is not zoned for housing. MOTION: Council Member Kurtz moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2026-010 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM establishing a performance time schedule for the commencement and completion of construction of Hotel 2 as set forth in the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 99-01 between the City of Anaheim and GardenWalk Hotel II, LLC, and determine that the previously approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), and associated addenda, are the appropriate environmental documentation for this request and RESOLUTION NO. 2026-011 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM establishing a performance time schedule for the commencement and completion of construction of Vacation Ownership Resort No. 1 as set forth in the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 99-01 between the City of Anaheim and Westgate Resorts Anaheim, LLC and determine that the previously approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND), and associated addenda, are the appropriate environmental documentation for this request, seconded by Council Member Rubalcava. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES — 0. Motion carried. City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 27 of 33 C410 21. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NO. 2024-00058 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AMENDMENT NO. 18 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 92-2 AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 18.116 ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 92-2 {SP 92-2) ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDSI INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 395 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT OWNER REPRESENTATIVE: Alice Hsu; 515 W. Katella Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92802 APPLICANT AGENT: Kenneth Pang; 150 El Camino Real, #112, Tustin, CA 92780 PROJECT LOCATION: The property is located at 515 West Katella Avenue, approximately 260 feet east of Harbor Boulevard. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of an increase in the number of hotel rooms at the Wyndham Hotel from the previously -approved 78 rooms to 107 rooms, and changes to accessory use areas. The request requires approval of the following entitlements: (1) General Plan Amendment to create a new density category, "Medium Density (Modified B)" for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP); (2) Amendment No. 18 to the ARSP to create a new density category "Medium Density (Modified B)," including an amendment to the Zoning Code; (3) Administrative Adjustment to allow a 28% reduction in the number of parking spaces required by the Code. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The City Council will consider whether to approve and adopt an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) and Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) No. 395, and determine that the IS/MND and MMP No. 395 prepared for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) are adequate to serve as the appropriate environmental documentation for the project. ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Approved Resolution No. PC2025-041 recommending that the City Council approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 395 for the Wyndham Hotel Density Modification Project; Resolution No. PC2025-042 recommending that the City Council approve and adopt a proposed General Plan Land Use Amendment; Resolution No. PC2025-043 approving an Administrative Adjustment for a reduction in Code - required parking for the Wyndham Hotel and making certain findings in connection therewith; and recommended approval of the project. VOTE: 7-0 (Chairperson Walker and Commissioners Abdulrahman, Castro, Kelly, Lieberman, Perez, and Tran-Martin voted yes) (Planning Commission meeting of December 1, 2025). RESOLUTION NO. 2026-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM to approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 395 for the Wyndham Hotel Density Modification Project (DEV2024- 00058) (515 West Katella Avenue). RESOLUTION NO. 2026-013 _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending the General Plan Land Use Element of the City of Anaheim (DEV2024-00058) (515 West Katella Avenue). ORDINANCE NO. 6621 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving and adopting amendments to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) and Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Amendment No. 18 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan) (DEV2024-00058). City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 28 of 33 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving an administrative adjustment for a reduction in code -required parking for the Wyndham Hotel and making certain findings in connection therewith (DEV2024-00058) (515 West Katella Avenue). Director Allen stated that the item is a public hearing for the existing Wyndham Hotel located at 515 West Katella Avenue in the Anaheim Resort. She noted that the Planning Commission recommended approval of this project at their December 1, 2025 meeting. She reported that the project site is located on the north side of Katella Avenue, east of Harbor Boulevard and was originally approved by the City in 1995 for 72 suite -type keyed rooms. Director Allen reported that in 2024, the City became aware that the hotel was operating with more keyed rooms than what had been originally approved for the site. She shared that a Code Enforcement case was opened in 2024 and inspections confirmed the increase. She explained that following the original construction, some of the two bedroom / two bathroom suites (1 keyed room) were converted into two keyed individual rooms. She stated that those and other unpermitted modifications resulted in a total of 107 keyed rooms and a conversion of approximately 6,400 square feet of accessory uses from serving hotel guests and employees to being open to the public. She added that the building footprint, overall square footage, sewer demand, site access, and on -site parking did not change from the previously -approved condition. She stated that other than work which may be required through the building permit process to legalize the unpermitted modifications, no new construction is proposed as part of the request. Director Allen reported that in order to retain the additional keyed rooms and accessory uses open to non -hotel guests, the applicant requests: a General Plan Amendment; a Specific Plan Amendment; an Administrative Adjustment pertaining to parking; and the corresponding environmental analysis. Director Allen stated that the site has a General Plan land use designation of Commercial Recreation which is unchanged. She reported that the C-R District in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan allows for hotels, motels, convention and conference facilities, as well as restaurants, retail shops and entertainment facilities with development densities ranging from 50 rooms per gross acre to up to 345 rooms. She noted that the various development densities are identified in Table LU-4 of the General Plan. She stated that the project requests the addition of a new density category of "Medium Density (Modified B)" to Table LU-4, which would permit a maximum density of up to 107 rooms and 6,394 square feet of accessory uses open to the public. Director Allen reported that similar to the General Plan Amendment, the amendment to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would create the "Medium Density (Modified B)" category. She noted that the amendment would update exhibits and text within the Specific Plan document and relevant ARSP Code Chapter to reflect the new density category and change the density associated with the property from Low -Medium Density to Medium Density (Modified B). She stated that the proposed amendment would not change the boundaries of the existing specific plan or make any changes to the development standards that implement this designation. She added that modification of density within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan is consistent with prior Council action to increase density for specific properties following a project -specific evaluation of the infrastructure which supports the request. Director Allen reported that the applicant requests a 28% reduction in the number of parking spaces required by the Code for the additional keyed rooms. She added that site is developed with 98 spaces, consistent with their original approval. She shared that Code now allows a deviation of up to 50% from the Code -required parking for hotels within the Resort through an administrative adjustment City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 29 of 33 and supported by a parking survey. She reported that a parking survey conducted at the existing hotel identified the highest demand for parking to be 79 spaces. She stated that the survey supports the adequacy of the 98 spaces to meet the parking requirement for the project, justifying the 28% reduction (well under the max 50% allowed). She added that staff have not received any complaints regarding parking from the surrounding business owners. She reported that to ensure that there are no impacts in the future should operations change, a condition of approval is included in the draft resolution that would require the introduction of alternative solutions such as valet or off -site parking. Director Allen reported that an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts of the project and to identify necessary mitigation measures. She noted that environmental analysis concluded that the existing infrastructure capacity is sufficient to accommodate the proposed density increase, and that the project impacts would be less than significant level with the implementation of mitigation measures from previously -certified EIR No. 313 and SEIR No. 340 for the ARSP. She stated that the proposed project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan by maintaining additional accommodation options for visitors of the resort area. She added that the project would allow an increase in hotel density and accessory uses for the existing hotel, which has been operating with the requested increase in density for several years. She concluded that the additional density can be accommodated through the existing infrastructure, and therefore, staff recommends Council approval of the project. DISCUSSION: Mayor Aitken inquired if the property owners have paid Transient Occupancy Taxes (TOT) on the 105 rooms or 72 rooms. Director Allen explained that the property owner has paid for the actual number of rooms. In response to Mayor Aitken, Director Allen explained that the application processing fees for the request are deposit -based and total approximately $35,000 for departmental review. She noted that the applicant funded a separate environmental review contract, which exceeded $58,000, although the full amount was not expended. She added that any other taxes, fees, or costs incurred by the City have been reimbursed. Mayor Aitken inquired whether the City should consider future zoning or land use changes to allow higher -density development on similar parcels in the area, noting that many of the existing hotels were developed prior to major resort -area expansions and improvements. She inquired whether increasing allowable density on such properties may be worth evaluating in the future. Director Allen confirmed the possibility of evaluating future zoning and land use changes to permit higher -density development on similar resort -area parcels, noting that many existing hotel properties were developed prior to significant growth and improvements in the area. Mayor Aitken requested whether the City could explore a broader area -wide zoning or planning update for hotel properties, rather than processing individual amendments on a case -by -case basis, and suggested the possibility of shared participation by hotel property owners to help offset the costs and resource demands of such an effort. Director Allen acknowledged that a broader, multi -parcel planning approach could create efficiencies of scale, particularly for environmental review and development planning. She noted that concepts such as shared parking among hotel properties could help reduce costs and support redevelopment on smaller or constrained parcels. City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 30 of 33 Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested clarification on the project timeline and asked staff to confirm whether the property owner had expanded the project from 78 to 107 rooms without the City's knowledge until the discrepancy was later brought to staff's attention. Director Allen clarified that the project was originally approved for 78 rooms, with 72 rooms ultimately constructed. She explained that during a TOT audit in 2024, and through review of the business license records, the City became aware that additional rooms had been added beyond the originally approved amount. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Leon, Director Allen explained that the property owner had not obtained the required permits for the unapproved work. She explained that through the Code Enforcement process, the owner was required to obtain an investigation permit to determine next steps. She noted the owner had the option to either remove the unpermitted improvements and restore the property to its original condition or pursue legalization of the work through the planning and building permit process. She explained that the owner chose to retain the improvements and, if approved by the Council, would be required to complete the building permit process and bring the work into compliance with current Code requirements. She confirmed that the legalization process would include the necessary inspections and code compliance review. In response to Council Member Balius, Director Allen confirmed that explained that, had the applicant sought approval prospectively, the process would have been the same as prior hotel projects, including the Hilton Garden Inn, Roadhouse, and Hyatt, by requesting an increase in density through the formal planning process rather than addressing it retroactively after construction. Council Member Balius inquired whether other hotel operators with larger suites or room configurations could pursue a similar process in the future to convert existing units into additional rooms through the City's established approval process. Director Allen reported the process would be similar. She explained that the City has not placed a cap on additional hotel density in the resort area and continues to evaluate requests on a project -by - project basis. She noted that similar conversions or redevelopment proposals may be considered if the infrastructure can support the increased room count, including evaluating impacts on utilities such as sewer capacity. She also noted that similar approvals have been granted for other hotel properties in the past. In response to Council Member Balius, Director Allen explained that current code provisions allow hotels to reduce parking requirements by up to 50% if certain conditions are met, such as providing rideshare pickup and drop-off spaces supported by a parking study. She noted that, in this case, the property has sufficient parking capacity beyond the originally approved room count and aligns with the resort area's "park once" philosophy to reduce vehicle use. She stated that as an added safeguard, conditions of approval authorize the Planning Director to require additional parking management measures, such as valet or off -site parking, if future issues arise. Council Member Kurtz acknowledged that the City's audit process effectively identified the unpermitted additional hotel rooms, noting that the property owner had continued paying the appropriate transient occupancy taxes and was not concealing the increased room count. She also commended staff for working collaboratively with hotel operators to explore redevelopment opportunities and flexibility for maximizing property potential, stating that the City's willingness to work with hoteliers may encourage additional reinvestment and improvements in the Resort area. At 9:18 p.m., Mayor Aitken opened the public hearing. City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 31 of 33 Kenneth Pang, architect for the property owner, thanked the City Council and staff for their review and collaboration throughout the application process. He noted that the environmental review found no significant impacts and emphasized that the property has been operating at its current capacity for many years without substantial change. He also introduced the property owner, Alice Hsu, who was present to provide additional background and context regarding the project. Alice Hsu, representing the owner, addressed the Council in support of the application, explaining that the discrepancy between the City's approved room count and the hotel's actual operation dates back to the original construction in 1999 and that the reasons for the discrepancy are unknown due to the passing of the original owner and contractor. She stated that the hotel has operated at its current room count for 27 years without issue and requested that the City correct the discrepancy to preserve the property's operational viability and brand affiliation. She noted that environmental and operational studies support the current use and emphasized the economic benefits to the City, including TOT revenue and local employment. She shared that the average room rate is $200 per night, generating over $334,000 in annual TOT taxes. She highlighted the property's 27 years of successful operation and requested Council's consideration and approval to correct the issue. Marc Herbert expressed concerns regarding the City's Code Enforcement practices, questioning how the unpermitted hotel room conversion went undetected for many years and raising concerns about consistency and fairness in Code Enforcement across different areas of the City. He urged the City to review enforcement practices more broadly and consider whether similar compliance issues may exist at other hotel properties. City Clerk Bass reported that no electronic public comments were received related to Public Hearing Item No. 21. At 9:28 p.m., Mayor Aitken closed the public hearing. DISCUSSION: Council Member Meeks thanked the property owner for cooperating with the City to resolve the room count discrepancy, acknowledging that the current ownership was not responsible for the original unpermitted conversion. She noted the owner's willingness to cover processing and environmental review costs and to comply with required building inspections MOTION: Council Member Meeks moved to RESOLUTION NO. _. 2026-012 _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM to approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 395 for the Wyndham Hotel Density Modification Project (DEV2024-00058) (515 West Katella Avenue), RESOLUTION NO. 2026-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending the General Plan Land Use Element of the City of Anaheim (DEV2024-00058) (515 West Katella Avenue), introduce ORDINANCE NO. 6621 _ (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving and adopting amendments to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) and Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Amendment No. 18 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan) (DEV2024- 00058), and RESOLUTION NO. 2026-014 _.._._ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving an administrative adjustment for a reduction in code -required parking for the Wyndham Hotel and making certain findings in connection therewith (DEV2024- 00058) (515 West Katella Avenue), seconded by Council Member Kurtz. DISCUSSION: Council Member Rubalcava requested clarification on whether the comments made by the property owner and project architect introduced any new information or differed from staff's recommendation. City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 32 of 33 Director Allen reported that the original record included 72 rooms. Council Member Rubalcava confirmed with Director Allen that the property owner's and architect's comments were consistent with the staff recommendation. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Leon, Director Allen clarified that when unpermitted construction is identified, property owners are generally given the option to pursue legalization of the work if it can be brought into compliance with current code requirements, or to remove and restore the property if compliance is not feasible. She confirmed that this process and set of options are applied consistently to all property owners. MOTION: Council Member Meeks moved to RESOLUTION NO. _- 2026-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM to approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 395 for the Wyndham Hotel Density Modification Project (DEV2024-00058) (515 West Katella Avenue), RESOLUTION NO. 2026-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending the General Plan Land Use Element of the City of Anaheim (DEV2024-00058) (515 West Katella Avenue), introduce ORDINANCE NO. 6621 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving and adopting amendments to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) and Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Amendment No. 18 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan) (DEV2024- 00058), and RESOLUTION NO. ___ 2026-014 _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving an administrative adjustment for a reduction in code -required parking for the Wyndham Hotel and making certain findings in connection therewith (DEV2024- 00058) (515 West Katella Avenue), seconded by Council Member Kurtz. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES — 0. Motion carried. Ordinance introduced. REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS: City Attorney Robert Fabela stated there was no reportable action for Item Nos. 1 and 3. For Item No. 2, the City Council voted 7-0 to approve the appointment of Greg Garcia as Interim City Manager. PUBLIC COMMENTS (non -agenda items),: None COUNCIL AGENDA SETTING: Mayor Pro Tern Leon requested that staff bring back options for replenishing funds for the current Contigo program and establishing a legal defense fund. Mayor Aitken stated that she is happy to work with Mayor Pro Tern Leon regarding a pro bono legal work component. Council Member Maahs requested a recognition for Blake's Place, a delicious barbecue restaurant located in District 5, celebrating 30 years of business. Council Member Kurtz requested a recognition for E. Kate Rea, one of the founders of the Anaheim Ebell Club, in honor of her accomplishments and contributions to the community City Council Minutes of February 24, 2026 Page 33 of 33 Council Member Rubalcava requested an item to discuss State rent control enforcement and possible implementation in Anaheim. She reiterated her prior request for a no -cause eviction policy protecting homeowners and renters. Assistant City Manager Garcia confirmed that he would follow up on the request and provide a memo to Council. Council Member Rubalcava stated that a memo would be acceptable; however, an agendized discussion would allow the Council to discuss policy considerations and enforcement expenses. Assistant City Manager Garcia stated that staff would provide a memo and a discussion could be agendized for a future date. Mayor Aitken requested that the memo include residents' options under the Fair Housing Act, whether violations are reported to the City, potential costs and funding sources to partner with the Public Law Center. and enforcement mechanisms. Assistant City Manager Garcia shared that staff previously reviewed those items and can prepare a memo soon. ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Council, Mayor Aitken adjourned the City Council at 9:36 p.m., in memory of Dick Edward Mosher, Jaime Llamas, and Paul Joseph Schiada. Respectfully submitted, _ e a ass, CMC City C erk Date: 2/4/2026 9:40:12 AM From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Fmd: Watch "#more criminal activity incidents to my car you have keys" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. ---------- Forwarded message ---- From Ruben Soto Date: Wed, Feb 4, 2026, 924 AM Date: 2/4/202611:29:27 AM Front To: Cc: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch "#you're all drunk in public hey you dirty cops you'll get yours too" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments uniess you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/9/2026 7:53:42 AM Front To: Cc: Subject Warning: lids email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/9/2026 1:24:44 PM From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] F,%W: Humboldt County Man Sentenced to 10 Years in Prison for Attempted Enticement of a Minor Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click finks or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. and Robert Morris the pastor at Gateway Church got 10 years but only served 6 months you see favoritism there or corruption or what do you sec just cuz he's a pastor ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: FBI <�a)subscriptions.ibigov> Date: Mon, Feb 9, 2026, 12:02 PM Subject: Hunruboldt Coutity Man Sentenced to 10 Years ui Prison for Attempted Enticen-rnt of a Mirror To: r FBI San Francisco News Humboldt County Man Sentenced to 10 Years in Prison for Attempted Enticement of a Minor A Humboldt County resident was sentenced to 120 months in federal prison for attempting to coerce and entice a minor to engage in sexual activity. Feb. 6, 2026 You have received this message because you are subscribed to one or more of the following categories: San Francisco Manage Subscription I Unsubscribe If you have questions about this service, email us at delivery&subscriptions.fbi.gov. Help I Privacy Policy I Visit FBI.gov Date: 2/12/2026 7:53:34 PM Front To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch 'Tnindyour ownbusiness nowit's too late" onYouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/13/2026 7:40:17 AM Front To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch "#you ain't all that police and Sheriff's and government" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/14/2026 1:00:25 PM From "Ruben Soto' To: Cc: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch "Met me knowwhen it's my mom's Last Rites to say a rosary" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/15/2026 1:10:26 PM From: To: Cc: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch "#thanks for letting me take you to hell and exposing your true colors ugly religion" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/15/202610:39:35 PM From: To: Cc Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch "the real truth about my family keep your nose out of my business boy" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/16/2026 8:15:00 AM Front To: Subject. YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/16/2026 6:27:39 PM Front To: Cc: Subject: [EXTERNAL] kick me out again Disneyland and you perverted men Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/18/2026 4:22:48 PM Front "Ruben Soto" To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch "#being homeless doesn't stop me to serve the Lord" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/18/2026 4:30:50 PM From To: Subject Waring: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/19/2026 12:18:01 PM From: To Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch " I just don't like you illegals" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/19/202612:26:42 PM From: To: Subject; Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/19/202612:32:21 PM From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch'Tkeep it up boys it proves you hate roman" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/19/20261:51:28 PM From To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch "#nry legacy my path my life rest in peace mom and dad" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/19/2026 3:05:42 PM From: To: Subject: [FXTERNA1.] Watch "hashtags so this is a God thing the way I'm living like a refugee huh" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click finks or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/20/2026 2:47:41 AM From: To: Cc Subject: (EXTERNALI Watch "#admit you got a problem brother and sister judge me I judge you you Liars" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/20/2026 3:07:43 AM From: To: Cc: Subject: Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/20/2026 3:24:42 AM From: "Ruben Soto"� To: Cc: Subject: [EXTER.N'AL] Watch "#the truth about our court system" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/21/2026 5:17:55 AM From: To: Subject: [FXTERNAI.] Watch "#another Criminal incident boss Auto Fullerton Robert" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click finks or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/21/2026 5:34:06 AM From: "Ruben Soto"� To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch "#more criminal incidents with boss Auto Flullerton Robert non-american" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/4/202610:37:46 AM Front To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] F%&- ❑ Paving the Way: How All Kids Bike Sparks Safer Routes to School Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From Craig A Durfey Date: Wed, Feb 4, 202 at Subject: Fwd: ❑ Paving the Way. How All Kids Bike Sparks Safer Routes to School To: Craig A Durfey Maureen Black= ---------- Forwarded message --------- From All Kids Bike <mtb&allkidsbJke.org> Date: Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 8:59 AM Subject: ❑ Paving the Way. How All Kids Bike Sparks Safer Routes to School To: CRAIG A View this email in your browser We're on a mission to teach every child in America how to ride a hike in kindergarten PE class. Across the country, we asked teachers if their community had safe biking routes to and from school —and whether the All Kids Bike program has helped spark improvements. The responses paint a clear picture of how this program is influencing not just students, but the safety of the routes they ride. "Are there safe biking routes to and from school? Has the All Kids Bike Program led to any improvements or advocacy for safer biking infrastructure in your area? " "Yes, by providing bikes and teaching safety in school, the program has helped promote safer biking practices and increased awareness. It has also contributed to advocacy efforts for improved biking infrastructure within the community." -Lashona Richetta, Toomer Elementary, Atlanta GA "Yes, as we speak the city of Cohasset is putting in sidewalks that connect from a busy road that goes toward the school, with a cross walk to get to the other side of street where the school sidewalk is, along with a lighted crosswalk." -Anne Campbell, Grand Rapids Schools, Minnesota "I've worked with Safe Routes to School and got older kids bikes before I had these striders. Also threw those grants I got a couple trails and there is a 4 mile trail as well on the edge of town." -Susan Carney, Arlee Elementary, Arlee, MT These insights show that when kids learn to ride, it can ignite a movement —one that rallies communities to create safer, more bike -friendly routes for everyone. And it's all possible because of supporters like you. Want to see more success stories from schools across the country? Follow us on social media for the latest updates, photos, and smiles! Nearly 1,800 schools are now rolling with the All Kids Bike Kindergarten PE Learn -to -Ride Program —reaching almost 180,000 students each year! That's 1.8 million children over the next decade who will gain the confidence, independence, and joy that comes with learning to ride. But we're not done yet. Right now, 125 schools are waiting in our funding queue, ready to start but needing support from generous donors like you. Your gift can be the one that puts a child on two wheels —and on the path to a lifetime of confidence. Here's what your donation helps provides for a school: ❑ Full Teacher Training and Complete Learn -to -Ride Curriculum with 8 lessons ❑ Access to the Teacher Portal + Program Support ❑ 24 Strider Balance Bikes ❑ 24 Pedal Conversion Kits ❑ 24 Fully Adjustable Helmets ❑ 2 Metal Rolling Storage Racks to store all student equipment ❑ 1 Teacher Instruction Bike with Pedal Conversion Kit + Helmet This $9,000 ready -to -teach program empowers PE teachers to teach bike riding in class —reaching thousands of students over the life of the program. "I highly recommend everyone gives this program a chance. You will find your own way to make this program work for you, your kids and your space. Focus on teaching bravery, safety and kindness, and your kids will shine. The parents will thank you too:' -Denise Streenstra, Liberty Oaks Elementary, Missouri We thank you for being a part of our mission of teaching every child in America how to ride a bike! Copyright © 2022 All Kids Bike, All rights reserved. Mailing Address: 2221 N. Plaza Dr Rapid City, SD 57702 Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list. Date: 2/5/2026 2:07:44 PM From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Al Draco Malfoy chatbot told `teen' thinking of suicide `to just do it already' Warning: This email originated from outside the Oity of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and are expecting the message. I thought you would be interested in this story I found on MSN: Al Draco Malfoy chatbot told `teen' thinldng of suicide `to just do it already' - baps•J/www.rrnn.corrien-us/news/teclmlo,gy/aI draco- DmIlby-chathot- told- teen- tivnku� = of- suicide- to- just- do- it- alreLdy/ar-AA 1 VJx5w? ocid=socialsbare Date: 2/5/20261:49:11 PM From To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Al Draco Malfoy chatbot told `teen' thinking of suicide `to just do it already' Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I thought you would be interested in this story I found on MSN: Al Draco Malfoy chatbot told `teen' thddrig of suicide `to just do it already' - https//www.msn.conicn-us/news/tecimology/ai draco-malfoy-cbatbot-told-teeti--dmding of-suicide-to-jtEt-do-it-already/ar-AAIVJX5w9 ocid=socialshare Date: 2/10/2026 2:11:05 PM From To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Fwd. Orange County Register. Social media `adducting the brains of children,' plaintiti's lawyer argues in landimik trial Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From Craig A Durfey Date: Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 12:03 PM Subject: Fwd: Orange County Register: Social media `addicting the brains of children,' plaintiffs lawyer argues in landmark trial ---------- Forwarded message --------- From Craig Durfey Date: Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 11:13 AM I thought you might like this story from Orange County Register. Social media `addicting the brains of children,' plairtiff's lawyer argues in landmark Dial bUs1/www.ocregister.corn(2026/02/10/opening-statements-social media -trial/ Sent from my Phone Date: 2/11/2026 6:58:44 AM From To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Fvvd: Children expose to screen time Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From Craig Durfey Date: Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 6:56 AM Seit from my tPhone Date: 2/11/20261:35:14 PM From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Fed: ❑ New Screen Deep Episode: The Costs of Youth Attachment to Al Companions Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From Children and Screens <infolcr)cMdrenandscreens.org> Date: Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 7:00 AM Subject: ❑ New Screen Deep Episode: The Costs of Youth Attachment to Al Companions To: Episode 27 The Costs of Youth Attachment to Al Companions wlrn Pilyoung Kim, PhD Professor in the Department of Psychology University of Denver Director Brain, Artificial Intelligence, and Child (BAIC) Center 1raa1 Al "friends" and companions are increasingly providing children and adolescents with social interactions and "relationships," despite being a technology that has no need for empathy or emotional reciprocity. On this episode of Screen Deep, host Kris Perry is joined by developmental psychologist and professor Dr. Pilyoung Kim. Dr. Kim describes her research examining children's responses to different types of Al systems, explains what makes certain children more vulnerable to developing problematic attachments to chatbots, and suggests better product design approaches to minimize harm while facilitating helpful uses. What you'll learn from this episode: • What makes Al chatbots feel "human" to kids and why that matters • Which children are more vulnerable to forming strong attachments to Al "best friends" - and the hidden costs of constant interactions with Al companions • Why children who are still developing their understanding of relationships and appropriate boundaries may be at risk from human -like Al companions • What parents and caregivers can do to help children and adolescents navigate Al companions more safely • What researchers urgently need to study next to identify and support youth most at risk of overattachment to Al chatbots Listen now to Screen Deep on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, Amazon Music and iHeartRadio. Each 30-50 minute episode brings fresh perspectives, cutting -edge research, and practical advice for raising children in the digital age. The next episode drops on March 4 — don't miss it! Learn more on the Children and Screens' website. P.S. Your support helps keep resources like this free and accessible. Every dollar is matched — double your impact today. child renandscreens.ora 1 276 5th Avenue Suite 704, Box #900 I New York, NY 10001 US Unsubscribe I Update Profile I Constant Contact Data Notice GConstant Contact ! ry email marketing for free today! Date: 2/11/20261:46:59 PM From: "Craig A Durfey" To Subject: [EXTERNAL] Fed: ❑ New Screen Deep Episode: The Costs of Youth Attachment to Al Companions Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Al "friends" and companions are increasingly providing children and adolescents with social interactions and "relationships," despite being a technology that has no need for empathy or emotional reciprocity. On this episode of Screen Deep, host Kris Perry is joined by developmental psychologist and professor Dr. Pilyoung Kim. Dr. Kim describes her research examining children's responses to different types of Al systems, explains what makes certain children more vulnerable to developing problematic attachments to chatbots, and suggests better product design approaches to minimize harm while facilitating helpful uses. What you'll learn from this episode: • What makes Al chatbots feel "human" to kids and why that matters • Which children are more vulnerable to forming strong attachments to Al "best friends" - and the hidden costs of constant interactions with Al companions • Why children who are still developing their understanding of relationships and appropriate boundaries may be at risk from human -like Al companions • What parents and caregivers can do to help children and adolescents navigate Al companions more safely • What researchers urgently need to study next to identify and support youth most at risk of overattachment to Al chatbots Listen now to Screen Deep on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, Amazon Music and iHeartRadio. Each 30- 50 minute episode brings fresh perspectives, cutting -edge research, and practical advice for raising children in the digital age. The next episode drops on March 4 — don't miss it! Learn more on the Children and Screens' website. P.S. Your support helps keep resources like this free and accessible. Every dollar is matched — double your impact today. ---------- Forwarded nrssa e--------- From Craig A Durfey Date: Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 1:35 PM Subject: Fwd: ❑ New Screen Deep Fpisode: The Costs ofYouth Attachment to Al Companions ---------- Forwarded rrrrssage--------- From CtWdren and Screens <inIb&cMdrenandscreens.org> Date: Wed, Feb 11, 2026 at 7:00 AM Subject: = New Screen Deep Episode: The Costs ofYouth Attachment to Al Corrpatuons To: Episode 27 The Costs of Youth Attachment to Al Companions With Pilyoung Kim, PhD Professor in the Department of Psychology University of Denver a� Director Brain, Artificial Intelligence, and Child (BAIL) Center 1raa1 AI "friends" and companions are increasingly providing children and adolescents with social interactions and "relationships," despite being a technology that has no need for empathy or emotional reciprocity. On this episode of Screen Deep, host Kris Perry is joined by developmental psychologist and professor Dr. Pilyoung Kim. Dr. Kim describes her research examining children's responses to different types of Al systems, explains what makes certain children more vulnerable to developing problematic attachments to chatbots, and suggests better product design approaches to minimize harm while facilitating helpful uses. What you'll learn from this episode: • What makes Al chatbots feel "human" to kids and why that matters • Which children are more vulnerable to forming strong attachments to Al "best friends" - and the hidden costs of constant interactions with Al companions • Why children who are still developing their understanding of relationships and appropriate boundaries may be at risk from human -like Al companions • What parents and caregivers can do to help children and adolescents navigate Al companions more safely • What researchers urgently need to study next to identify and support youth most at risk of overattachment to Al chatbots Listen now to Screen Deep on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, YouTube, Amazon Music and iHeartRadio. Each 30-50 minute episode brings fresh perspectives, cutting -edge research, and practical advice for raising children in the digital age. The next episode drops on March 4 — don't miss it! Learn more on the Children and Screens' website. P.S. Your support helps keep resources like this free and accessible. Every dollar is matched — double your impact today. child renandscreens.ora 1 276 5th Avenue Suite 704, Box #900 1 New York, NY 10001 US Unsubscribe I Update Profile I Constant Contact Data Notice (:G__ Constant ./V Contact Try email marketing for free today! Date: 2/11/20261:21:22 PM From: "Craig A Durfey" To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Fw: Legislative Leaps and Bounds: Global Guardrails Are Taking Shape —and Parents Lead the Way Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Mothers Against Media Addiction <info@wearemama.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 202612:01 PM To: CRAIG A DURFEY Subject: Legislative Leaps and Bounds: Global Guardrails Are Taking Shape —and Parents Lead the Way The push to reform Section 230 in Washington, D.0 with [from L to R]: Dani Pinter, Kristin Bride, Joseph Gordon -Levitt, Julie Scelfo, SC Rep. Brandon Guffey, and Sarah Q'Quinn Dear CRAIG, The movement to hold Big Tech accountable for how their products harm our children is a global one. And all across the world, policymakers are increasingly stepping up to put guardrails on social media and other addictive tech. In a watershed moment, Spain has just become the first European country to propose banning social media for kids under 16, and the Spanish government is also devising a plan to hold social media companies liable for illegal, hateful or harmful content on their platforms. At the same time, the European Union is demanding changes to TikTok's addictive design, stating that its endless scroll and other features violate EU law for online safety and pose potential harm to the "physical and mental well-being" of kids and other users. At MAMA, we are determined to ensure that our politicians here in the U.S. follow these global examples and take swift, meaningful action to protect kids. Last week, I was proud to join survivor parents, including Kristin Bride of Parents Rise!, along with the Center on Countering Digital Hate, Issue One, the National Center on Sexual Exploitation (NCOSE) and actor and advocate (and dad) Joseph Gordon -Levitt in Washington, D.C. to push for reforms to Section 230. This outdated policy shields social media companies from legal responsibility for harmful content promoted on their platforms, enabling major tech companies to avoid liability even when their products cause unthinkable suffering. At a press conference led by Sen. Dick Durbin, several parents spoke movingly about the children they have lost to social media. That included Kristin, whose son Carson died by suicide after he experienced intense cyberbullying, as well as Bridgette Noring, who tragically lost her son to fentanyl poisoning after he encountered a drug dealer on Snapchat. Let's continue to take these incredible parent activists as inspiration, a deeply powerful reminder of why we are all in this fight. Not backing down, Julie Updates from MAMA HQ _I WE DID IT!! Last week, South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster signed the Age - Appropriate Design Code into law, establishing that social media companies have a clear "duty of care" to protect kids from harmful content on their platforms, while also requiring these companies to responsibly handle minors' personal data, rein in addictive features, and stop targeting kids with surveillance advertising. Passage of this bill was a two-year effort for MAMA in the face of relentless opposition from Big Tech, and the tech giants aren't done fighting yet. One of the major tech lobbying groups has already filed a lawsuit to challenge this critically important legislation. We thank Gov. McMaster, State Rep. Brandon Guffey, our Fort Mill Chapter Leader Kimberly Long and all our advocacy partners for helping us protect our kids and for staying in the fight against media addiction! And special thanks to all South Carolina MAMA community members who helped make this victory happen by ensuring our voices were heard. In Nebraska, state senators have introduced new legislation that would create safeguards to protect minors from the growing threats of AI.The proposed legislation would require companies to clearly disclose when a user is communicating with a chatbot and not a real person, prohibit these companies from instituting a reward system for continuous use, and prevent Al chatbots from generating any sexually explicit content or interactions. Our Omaha MAMA Chapter Leader Michele Neily (above) testified in support of the bill and shared her concerns about how kids are becoming increasingly reliant on Al technology: "Two in three teens use Al chatbots, and 12% have turned to them for emotional or mental health support." New MAMA Chapter 4P ❑ Give a warm welcome to our new Granby, Connecticut Chapter! If you're in Granby. CT and want to get involved or just hear more, please click below and we'll connect you to our new Chapter. ON TRIAL Meta executive Adam Mosseri, the head of Instagram, is as the world's biggest social media companies face a landmark trial in Los Angeles seeking to hold them responsible for harms to children who used their platforms. A lawyer for the plaintiffs called the case as "easy as ABC... addicting the brains of children." He also shared communication of Meta employees discussing how Instagram is "like a drug" and that employees are "basically pushers." Additional internal documents revealed that a Meta researcher warned in 2020 that 500,000 kids a day were being targeted by 'creeps' on Facebook and Instagram. A similar trial is underway in New Mexico focused on whether Meta misrepresented the safety of its platforms LEADERSHIP In the wake of landmark social media trials, we are starting to see more political candidates standing up to Big Tech and supporting policies that would protect kids. And no surprise - it's starting with moms. Michigan State Sen. Mallory McMorrow, a candidate for U.S. Senate, (whose bio includes the description "Noa's mom") just rolled out a new set of proposals designed to take action on kids' online safety and put safeguards on Al, which she explains in VULNERABLE More than 1 in 3 teen boys report gambling in the last year, and nearly 60% of them say the content "just started showing ,: on their social media algorithms. Tim Daly, a longtime education expert who writes the EdDaly substack, warns that legalized and heavily marketed gambling is quietly becoming a major threat to teens — especially boys. USA Today investigative reporter Nick Penzenstadler spoke with The Excerpt podcast about how regulators are doing little to nothing to stop it. CAUTION In a conversation with ABC News about Al technology, Anthropic co-founder Daniela Amodei expressed concerns about the risks of Al for her children and other kids, acknowledging that "we still have a lot of work to do' to mitigate Al's potential harms. Amodei also explained the need for caution in how kids interact with Al, noting that Anthropic does not allow users under 18 to interact with its chatbot. UNHEALTHY Is overreliance on technology causing students to miss the most important parts of growing up? Clay Shirky, New York University's Vice Provost for Al and Technology in Education says they might be in an important guest essay for The New York Times. Al's constant praise trains users for validation over connection, contributing to what sociologists call social deskilling. DISTRACTED Even film students are struggling to sit through full movie,. This eye-opening piece from The Atlantic shows how the attention economy and nonstop scrolling are reshaping young people's ability to focus, learn, and engage with the world around them. BREAKUP As governments and individuals alike grow wary of U.S. tech company power, countries such as France, India, and South Korea are pushing for "tech sovereignty" by encouraging users to stay away from U.S. platforms, and promoting apps and social media websites developed within their own countries. In these locations, alternatives to Silicon Valley platforms are suddenly gaining real momentum. SAFETY A new report from Common Sense Media reveals that a strong majority of U.S. adults are now in favor of strict age restrictions and privacy protections for social media and Al, driven by concerns that these platforms are "not meant for children" and that current age -verification tools are too easy to bypass. PEACE A group of Buddhist monks concluded their 2,300 mile walk for peace across the U.S. yesterday, arriving in Washington, D.C. and delivering remarks. One of the monks had an urgent message. "Please don't touch your phone when you wake up in the ;. This is a must.This is way to train yourself. Every time when you touch your phone, your mind starts wandering... Instead, make your bed, nice and neat. Go to the bathroom - still no phone. Do your thing. Come out. Get a piece of paper and a pen. Write out the statement `today is going to be my peaceful day.'..when your han[d] pairs with the mind, it makes a big difference." MERCH Stock up on all Winter items! Enjoy our MAMA Merch from our All proceeds support MAMA. ALMA MAMA's BOOKSHOP Looking for resources about raising children with technology? Or maybe you're just wanting to know more about the growing impact of Al? Look no further than We have carefully curated essential reads for understanding the impact of tech and media on our children's lives. Fighting Media Addiction 0 by Mothers Against Media Addiction RESET YOUR I EN ARGUMENT'S CHILD'S BRAIN FOR DELETIM a YOUR SOCIAL. MEDIA ACCOUN"IS I 11I I11 NO\Y' yy View all (9) I IIARTIFICIAL UNINTELLIGENCE I 24/6 °°^ '— i �o� yyy TIFFANY SWAIN Eai� OIrM BPOYSSANO Date: 2/11/2026 3:06:33 PM From: To Cc: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Instagram chief says he does not believe people can get clinically addicted to social media Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. (P.R.D.D.C.) PARENTS FOR THE RIGHTS OF DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED CHILDREN CRAIG A. DURFEY FOUNDER OF P.R.D.D.C. P.O.BOX 2001 GARDEN GROVE, CA 92842 FACEBOOK: CRAIG DURFEY U.S. HOUSE OF CONGRESS H2404 - HONORING CRAIG DURFEY FOR HIS FIGHT AGAINST AUTISM ... Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. httpsd/www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-2003-03-27/pdf/CREC-2003-03-27.pdf new website socialemotionalpaws.org Instagram chief says he does not believe people can get clinically addicted to social media Adam Mosseri said he and his colleagues use the term "problematic use" to refer to "someone spending more time on Instagram than they feel good about, and that definitely happens." By KAITLYN HUAMANI and BARBARA ORTUTAY LOS ANGELES (AP) —Adam Mosseri, the head of Meta's Instagram, testified Wednesday during a landmark social media trial in Los Angeles that he disagrees with the idea that people can be clinically addicted to social media platforms. Related Articles • New Mexico lawsuit accuses Meta of failing to protect children from sexual exploitation online • Landmark trial accusing social media companies of addicting children to their platforms begins • Security concerns and skepticism are bursting the bubble of Moltbook, the viral AI social forum • Malibu's HRL Labs cuts 376 jobs after losing, government work • EU accuses TikTok of `addictive design' that harms children, seeks changes to protect users The question of addiction is a key pillar of the case, where plaintiffs seek to hold social media companies responsible for harms to children who use their platforms. Meta Platforms and Google's YouTube are the two remaining defendants in the case, which TikTok and Snap have settled. At the core of the Los Angeles case is a 20-year-old identified only by the initials "KGM," whose lawsuit could determine how thousands of similar lawsuits against social media companies would play out. She and two other plaintiffs have been selected for bellwether trials — essentially test cases for both sides to see how their arguments play out before a jury. Mosseri said it's important to differentiate between clinical addiction and what he called problematic use. The plaintiffs lawyer, however, presented quotes directlyfrom Mosseri in a podcast interview a few years ago where he said the opposite, but he clarified that he was probably using the term "too casually," as people tend to do. Mosseri said he was not claiming to be a medical expert when questioned about his qualifications to comment on the legitimacy of social media addiction, but said someone "very close" to him has experienced serious clinical addiction, which is why he said he was "being careful with my words." Edit Image He said he and his colleagues use the term "problematic use" to refer to "someone spending more time on Instagram than they feel good about, and that definitely happens." It's "not good for the company, over the long run, to make decisions that profit for us but are poor for people's wellbeing," Mosseri said. Late NFL star Pat Tillman's brother pleads guilty to setting fire at California post officeWatch More Mosseri and the plaintiffs lawyer, Mark Lanier, engaged in a lengthy back -and -forth about cosmetic filters on Instagram that changed people's appearance in a way that seemed to promote plastic surgery. "We are trying to be as safe as possible but also censor as little as possible," Mosseri said. In the courtroom, bereaved parents of children who have had social media struggles seemed visibly upset during a discussion around body dysmorphia and cosmetic filters. Meta shut down all third party augmented reality filters in January 2025. The judge made an announcement to members of the public on Wednesday after the displays of emotion, reminding them not to make any indication of agreement or disagreement with testimony, saying that it would be "improper to indicate some position." In recent years, Instagram has added a slew of features and tools it says have made the platform safer for young people. But this does not always work. A report last year, for instance, found that teen accounts researchers created were recommended age - inappropriate sexual content, including "graphic sexual descriptions, the use of cartoons to describe demeaning sexual acts, and brief displays of nudity." In addition, Instagram also recommended a "range of self -harm, self -injury, and body image content" on teen accounts that the report says "would be reasonably likelyto result in adverse impacts for young people, including teenagers experiencing poor mental health, or self -harm and suicidal ideation and behaviors." Meta called the report "misleading, dangerously speculative" and said it misrepresents its efforts on teen safety. Meta is also facing a separate trial -in -New -Mexico that began this week. Date: 2/12/2026 8:24:45 PM From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Bay Area family supports lawsuit accusing social media apes of being addictive, harmful Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I thought you would be interested in this story I found on MSN: Bay Area f roily supports lawsuit accusing social media apps of being addictive, hanrdid-1mpsJ/www.nsn.conien-us/rmney/otber/bay-area-tairn`ly- supports-lawsuit-accusing-socia�-nedia-apps-of-being addictive -hat i&� ,i AAl Wc6UX?ocid=socialsbare Date: 2/13/2026 2:28:35 PM From To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] BA- In the News: Human Trafficking & Online Exploitation 2.12.26 Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. ---------- Forwarded messa e--------- From Craig A Durfey Date: Fri, Feb 13, 2026 at 223 PM Subject: Fwd: In the News: Human Trafficking & Online Exploitation 2.12.26 To: Craig A Ihn%y Maureen Blackmm ---------- Forwarded message --------- From Million Mrds <i fo&pi lionkids.org> Date: Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 1-03 PM Subject: In the News: Htunan Trafficking & Online Exploitation 2.12.26 To: MILLI Keepin, Kids Safe From Predmtors EDUCATE TO PROTECT & PREVENT THANK YOU FOR CARING. PLEASE FORWARD THIS EMAIL TO FAMILY AND FRIENDS AND LET'S FIGHT TOGETHER TO EDUCATE TO PROTECT OUR CHILDREN. THIS EDITION OF "IN THE NEWS" (Scroll down to see content): • Behind the crowd at big events • Predators on Roblox • School provided laptops • Peer led online safety • Human Trafficking: Life sentence imposed, Bridal shop served as hub, • Exploitation: Norway's Police2Peer CSAM Project, Man from Chile entices 14-year-old from Los Angeles, Opinion: Porn industry normalizing sex trade for teen girls, 2nd jury trial for Meta, Florida teen linked to extremist group • Around the Globe: Australian CSAM offender with 23,000 files, Europe finds TikTok in breach, Undercover in a scam center, UK finds Al clones • P3 Kids Podcast: Do You Know These Terms and Why they Matter to Your Child's Online Safety? The following content may contain sensitive topics. Reader discretion is advised. Ban Nudify Apps Million Kids stands with over 107 organizations, institutions and individuals globally to demand urgent action against nudifying tools —technology designed to create non-consensual nude and abusive imagery disproportionately targeting children and women. Click on the button below to sign the statement. On the website, scroll down to where it says: online form Behind the Crowd: See What Others Miss at Big Games Thousands of people gather for big events like the Super Bowl and World Cup. That means more eyes watching —and more chances to spot the signs of trafficking. Human trafficking doesn't always look like what you've seen in movies. It's happening around you right now in the hotel down the street, at the restaurant where you ate lunch, even near the stadium where you're cheering. You have the power to spot the real warning signs. You can be the voice that breaks the silence. Together, we can help protect people who desperately need it by reporting what we see. LINK TO WEBSITE Million Kids Insights: Please know that each one of us has to speak up if we see something suspicious and not just at the big game but in our neighborhoods. Even if we don't have proof. By identifying and reporting suspected human trafficking, you are doing your part to help law enforcement recover victims. This comes directly from the DHS website: Law enforcement can connect survivors of human trafficking to services such as medical and mental health care, shelters, job training, and legal assistance that restore their freedom and dignity. The public's vigilance to report human trafficking is a vital line of defense against this heinous crime. What to Report: • WHO you saw. • WHAT you saw. • WHEN you saw it. • WHERE it occurred. WHY it is suspicious No tip is insignificant. If a situation gives you pause, trust your instincts. The presence or absence of any of the indicators is not necessarily proof of human trafficking. It is up to law enforcement to investigate suspected cases and make the determination. Factors such as race, ethnicity, gender, and/or religious affiliation are not indicators of suspicious behavior. Below is an aerial billboard flown in San Francisco over the Super Bowl weekend. Dad claims 16-year-old daughter took her own life after meeting a predator on Roblox, slams game platform beloved by kids Penelope Sokolowski was just 16 years old when she took her own life last February Her father, Jason, believes her suicide was the culmination of a grooming process that began on Roblox, the game platform beloved by kids — with some 170,000 users under the age of 13, according to company data from 2023. "We kind of thought we were covering all the bases," Jason told The Post, noting that his family had used a third -party app to monitor Penelope's online activity. Jason alleges that his only child was contacted by a predator on Roblox who coerced her into cutting his name into her chest and sending videos of herself bloodied from self -harm — and who, ultimately, sent Penelope down a spiral that culminated in her death. LINK TO ARTICLE Million Kids Insights: Matt Dolman's firm, an attorney for a plaintiff, is aware of at least 119 lawsuits filed against Roblox since 2025. The cases, which span 34 states, include a shocking array of predatory behavior. What many parents don't understand about Roblox is that it is a game creation platform and hosts games which can be created by anyone including kids and teens, hobbyists, professionals, companies creating branded events and even predators. There are millions of individual games on Roblox and only a very small fraction are made by Roblox. Most importantly, there is no vetting or approval process before a game goes live. A creator can publish instantly and the content can be unsafe for children. Because anyone can create a game and publish it instantly, parents should know: • Quality varies between games. • Safety is not required. • Some games include unmoderated chat, private servers, or loopholes. • Predators can join games to contact kids (especially those with unmoderated chat). This is why parents should vet each individual qame, not assume that "Roblo)e' as a whole is safe. They should also be checking their child's chats or messaging, know who they are interacting with and what games they are playing. Washington County schools implement Proxyware to detect predators and scammers online Washington County, Virginia, Public Schools are using a new system called Proxyware, CEO of the Virginia -based company Chris Olson tells News 5's Yannia Nordelo it helps detect online predators and scammers targeting students. We protect children by detecting and disrupting digital harms that reach them through social media websites and apps, said Olson. Olson says online danger doesn't always look obvious. LINK TO ARTICLE Million Kids Insights: Your seven year old is using their school provided laptop for tutoring. The tutor is using a cartoon filter that glitches to reveal that the tutor is naked. A 10-year-old is groomed online for weeks by a predator through their school provided Chromebook until the parent discovers the messages. Both of these are real cases. School -provided laptops are not inherently safe from scammers or predators. They can be safer than a personal device, but only if the school configures and monitors them well, and unfortunately many don't or can't. The evidence shows that predators and exploitative networks absolutely reach kids through school devices, even when filters are in place. On many school devices, the protection and security blocks inappropriate websites. But predators don't usually use websites to contact kids. They will use email, chat features inside educational platforms, gaming platforms accessible through the browser, Discord -like clones or lesser -known messaging tools, social media sites that slip past filters and anonymous or encrypted apps that don't require installation. Predators also exploit the fact that kids assume that the school laptop is safe. Law enforcement warns that predators do not stop because a child is "in school." Kids may be targeted just as easily during school hours as they might be during the off school hours. The FBI also reports a major rise in sextortion and grooming attempts across platforms commonly used by students. School devices reduce some risks (malware, unsafe downloads) but do not protect against human predators, grooming, or sextortion. The safest approach for any parent is to treat school laptops exactly like any other internet-connected device: • Regularly check browser history, email, and messaging tools • Keep the device in shared spaces at home and turned off at night • Ask your child who they talk to online and why • Set clear rules about communication with strangers • Teach them to report anything uncomfortable immediately Parents should also be asking the school what monitoring tools they use and whether those rules apply off -campus. And finally, the school should be transparent with parents about third -party apps, tutors, and communication channels being used. Students leading the way: Hampshire Regional pioneers first peer -led online safety program Who is teaching kids howto safely browse social media, video games and the internet? This past month at Hampshire Regional High School, it has been high schoolers who have taken the lead in mentoring middle schoolers, as the first school in the area to pioneer such a peer -led initiative. Starting in early January, HRHS students in grades 10 through 12 were trained to give an online safety lesson to seventh graders, aiming to give younger students the tools to recognize and respond to online harm. LINK TO ARTICLE Million Kids Insights: These types of programs should be in every school. And it can't just be peer -to -peer but also at home between parent and child. Even grandparent and grandchild. Technology is not to be feared but to be understood. To know the way it can be used for good, but to also understand the risks and dangers. The following is taken from Opal's new book Digital Warfare: Our Kids on the Frontline - To be successful, the less of a technology information gap there needs to be between the generations. The better you can have discussions about how and where young people can become leaders for the next generation. Fortunately, most younger parents today grew up using technology, but the older people are still living in a world of Facebook and FreeCell. For young people to take you seriously, you have to have an understanding of the world they live in. This generation of young people cannot afford to be naive and gullible and easy to influence. They will be interacting (online) with millions of people they have never met, and some of those people will want to access, groom, seduce and recruit our young people. Others will want to indoctrinate or radicalize them and tell them endless untruths to get them to engage in criminal or political activities that might be harmful. Being a parent today may be one of the greatest and toughest callings of all time. Every day, our team sees stories of innocent young people drawn into things their parents never imagined. It's up to parents, teachers, coaches, and mentors to guide kids to become strong, grounded leaders with healthy values in a complex and fast - changing world. RELATED STORY: `I fell into it': ex -criminal hackers urge Manchester pupils to use web skills for good Cybercriminals, the shadowy online figures often depicted in Hollywood movies as hooded villains capable of wiping millions of pounds off the value of businesses at a keystroke, are not usually known for their candour. But in a sixth -form college in Manchester this week, two former hackers gave the young people gathered an honest appraisal of what living a life of internet crime really looks like. LINK TO ARTICLE The Riverside County Child Exploitation Team delivered in 2025. RCCET is a multi -agency task force comprised of 27 federal, state, and local Law Enforcement Officers with a single mission: Investigate and disrupt child exploitation crimes occurring in Riverside County. Stats provided by: Liam Doyle -Supervising District Attorney Investigator/ FBI Task Force Officer @ Riverside County DA's Office Note: Riverside County, CA is the location of the Million Kids home office. Year -to -Year Comparison 2024 2025 % Change CyberTip Rcports Received 5,360 11,187 +108 % Child Rescues and Identifications 19 76 +300 % Arrests 154 179 +16 % Search Warants and Sbpocnas 124 1,325 +968 % Terabytes of Data Forensically Examined 93 TB 244 TB +162% Human Trafficking Life sentence imposed in federal human trafficking case Chad Cornelious Seymore, a/k/a "Circle City Pimp", 50, of Dothan, Alabama, was sentenced to Life in federal prison after previously pleading guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion; four counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion; two counts of interstate travel in aid of racketeering; and one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering. Seymore's co-defendant, Kimberly Robinson Gandy, 48, of Gulfport, Mississippi, was found guilty by a federal jury in June 2025 of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion; sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion; and conspiracy to commit money laundering. Gandy was sentenced to 25 years' imprisonment. Over a four-year period Seymore conspired with others to bond adult women out of county jails and then forced or coerced them to commit commercial sex acts in Alabama and across North Florida. Seymore also recruited women suffering from drug addictions at hotels and through online advertisements. He threatened and physically abused his sex trafficking victims. Gandy conspired with Seymore to traffic women in Panama City Beach and Destin. They used online money exchange platforms to transfer funds received from commercial sex acts. LINK TO ARTICLE Bridal shop served as `hub' for human trafficking, drug -dealing operations, prosecutors say Authorities in Virginia say a Roanoke business is part of an ongoing investigation about possible ties to prostitution and human trafficking. Prosecutors say the bridal store, Amanda's Touch, was used as a "front" for such crimes. According to the Virginia State Police, investigators discovered the defendants were dealing drugs in several locations between Rockbridge and Floyd counties. The group then used that money to fuel the human trafficking operation. "There is evidence to show drugs, money and coercion were being used to control these victims, to coerce them into prostitution and human trafficking," Floyd County Commonwealth's Attorney Eric Branscom said. LINK TO ARTICLE Six arrested in juvenile human trafficking investigation, Gulfport Police say Six people have been arrested in a human trafficking and kidnapping investigation, according to the Gulfport Police Department - The juvenile was held against her will between Dec. 2025 and Jan. 2026 and forced to perform sexual acts for Mills, officials said. Police said Mills threatened to report the juvenile as a runaway if she refused to comply. The juvenile escaped by fleeing through a window. LINK TO ARTICLE Video for Parents Click the arrow and watch a one -minute video for a quick look at how sex traffickers use the Internet to recruit. If the link doesn't work, you can also go to https://youtu.be/ZpEemVpBi10 ONLINE SEX TRAFFICKING REa rING _ Keay' n Kids -Safe Fri- freda±�rs Exploitation: CSEA Sextortion, CSAM, Grooming & Recruitment Norway's Police2Peer CSAM Project - Live Map of People looking for Child Sex Abuse Materials The Police2Peer project works to protect children from abuse by raising awareness about how much abusive material is shared online and by making it more difficult to access real images and videos of abuse. The project, which has been running since 2017, uploads files to file -sharing networks (Peer2Peer/P2P) with names that resemble real child sexual abuse material. This is done to show how easy it is to find and share such content on these networks. For someone searching for abusive material on these networks, the files appear genuine because of their filenames. The actual content of the files only becomes visible after they are downloaded and played on the user's device. In reality, these files contain videos and images with information from the police. The purpose is to inform users about the risks they are taking and the legal consequences of downloading or distributing abusive material — and to increase the perceived risk of detection. LINK TO LIVE MAP SHOWING WHERE SOM EONE IS ATTEM PTING TO DOWNLOAD CSAM L.A. girl, 14, sexually assaulted by man visiting Southern California from Chile A 22-year-old man from Santiago, Chile was sentenced to more than 11 years in federal prison for enticing a 14-year-old Southern California girl to engage in illicit sexual activity, authorities announced earlier this month. Daniel Andres Aravena Oliva met the unidentified juvenile female online, federal investigators said. Between December 2023 and May 2024, Aravena used various internet platforms to communicate with the teen, including Zoom, FaceTime and the virtual -reality gaming platform Roblox, and knowingly encouraged her to engage in illegal sexual activity with him, including sending him sexually explicit photos of herself. LINK TO ARTICLE Opinion: The porn industry is normalising the sex trade for the next generation of teen girls Teacher and researcher Eoghan Cleary breaks down a recent L'Oreal advertising campaign that partnered with an OnlyFans creator — and explains how girls are being targeted by the porn industry at younger and younger ages. LINK TO ARTICLE `Marketplace for predators': Meta faces second jury trial over child exploitation claims Meta's second major trial of 2026 over alleged harms to children begins on Monday. (We included info on the first lawsuit out of Los Angeles in last week's "In the News.") The landmark jury trial in Santa Fe pits the New Mexico attorney general's office against the social media giant. The state alleges that the company knowingly enabled predators to use Facebook and Instagram to exploit children. The trial will introduce evidence that Raul Torrez, the state's attorney general, believes shows how Meta's social networks create dangerous environments for children, exposing them to sexual exploitation, solicitation, sextortion and human trafficking. LINK TO ARTICLE Teen linked to neo-Nazi satanic hate group accused of planning mass shooting at Wimauma church: HCSO WIMAUMA, Fla. - The Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office says a teen arrested last week was involved in a chatroom for violent extremists and discussed plans to carry out a mass shooting at a church near his home in Wimauma. What we know: The sheriffs office began investigating Jose Pagan Jr., 14, on Jan. 27 after receiving information about suspected child exploitation activity linked to the IP address of Pagan's residence. During the investigation, detectives searched Pagan's home and computer, recovering 14 graphic images involving the abuse of infants and toddlers, HCSO said. LINK TO ARTICLE AROUND THE GLOBE Queensland Australia man charged after police allege 23,000 files of child abuse seized A Queensland man has been charged with 596 child abuse -related offences after he allegedly "groomed, coerced and threatened" hundreds of children. Ethan Burns-Dederer, 27, from UK: Criminals using AI to clone voices and set up direct debits National Trading Standards (NTS) said it blocked almost 21 million scam phone calls and shut down 2,000 numbers in a six-month period. Fraudsters began the process by asking victims to participate in a so-called "lifestyle survey" phone Maryborough, was allegedly found in possession of 23,000 videos and images relating to his offending, involving 459 victims in Australia and 14 other countries. Police allege Mr Burns-Dederer offended against primarily male children aged five to 15 years old and they've identified potentially 360 victims to date. LINK TO ARTICLE European Commission preliminarily finds TikTok's addictive design in breach of the Digital Services Act The European Commission preliminarily found TikTok in breach of the Digital Services Act for its addictive design. This includes features such as infinite scroll, autoplay, push notifications, and its highly personalised recommender system. LINK TO ARTICLE Sky News reporter goes undercover in scam centre - and gets hired after two -minute interview More than a year ago, Brother Compound in Cambodia's capital was impenetrable. There was no way we'd get past the barbed wire, high walls and security guards at the gate to peer inside the notorious scam factory. LINK TO ARTICLE call, which was actually designed to gather personal, health and financial details. Latest figures from NTS suggests that UK adults now receive an average of seven scam calls or texts per month, with about one in five (21 %) receiving them most days and 9% receiving them every day. LINK TO ARTICLE India: 3 sisters jump to their deaths from balcony after dad bans them from playing Korean 'love game' Three young sisters threw themselves off their balcony and died in India on Wednesday after their father banned them from playing a Korean "love game" on his phone, according to shocking local reports. The children, identified as Vishika, 16, Prachi, 14, and Pakhi, 12, were so upset that their parents cut off their access to the addictive game they left behind an eight -page suicide note and then plunged, one after the other, NDTV reported. LINK TO ARTICLE LA's Rival Gangs Form "Super Gang" Under Mexican Mafia Control Once -bitter enemies MS-13 and 18th Street Gang have formed an unprecedented alliance across Los Angeles, creating what police describe as a "super gang" under Mexican Mafia control. LINK TO ARTICLE HAVE YOU ORDERED THIS MUST HAVE BOOK FOR YOUR FAMILY? Digital Warfare: Our Kids on the Frontline Available as a PDF, Audio, Kindle version and/or Paperback DO YOU KNOW HOW TO RECOGNIZE ONLINE Cyber exploitation of minors may be the fastest growing crime in the world. DANGERS? CAN YOU TALK TO YOUR FAMILY ABOUT THEM? This is a must have for every parent, grandparent, teacher, coach, school administrator, faith based leader and anyone who cares about kids and wants to protect them from predators. KNOWLEDGE IS POWER! Click here > PDF and/or AUDIO Version P3 Kids Podcast The insights you'll gain here will help you build stronger, more honest conversations with your child, giving them the tools to resist, recover, and be leaders in a digital world. Most importantly, these conversations may not just shape their future... IT MAY SAVE THEIR LIFE. Click here Amazon > Kindle or paperback Do you know these terms and why they matter to your child's online safety? Most parents have never heard of many of them but predators, cartels, and global scam networks use them every single day to target kids. So if you don't know what they mean, your child is already at a disadvantage. FINANCIAL SEXTORTION FRIEND -OF -A -FRIEND SEDUCTION STRATEGY APP-TRANSFER TRAPS NUDES ONLINE — IT'S A TRAP SCAM FARMS & NUDIFY SITES OPEN All IN GAMING & CHARACTER AI GEOLOCATION SOFTWARE E2EE (END -TO -END ENCRYPTION) 764 F2P GAMES & FREEMIUMS If these terms are new to you, that's exactly why this podcast matters. Kids are navigating a digital battlefield with enemies they can't see and tactics they don't understand. Parents can't protect their children from threats they don't know exist. Being educated as a parent is foundational, and then talking to your kids is the next step. It's not about fear. It's about giving your kids the tools to protect themselves and recognize the dangers. It's about giving families the truth, the tools, and the language they need to protect those they love in a world that has changed faster than anyone expected. Links to listen to the P3 Podcast Be sure to Subscribe - Like Pandora CLiC;K HERE iHeart Radio CLICK HERE Spotify CLICK HERE Apple Podcasts CLICK HERE Amazon Music CLICK HERE Rumble CLICK HERE YouTube CLICK HERE Million Kids Social Media Links Be sure to Follow - Like - Subscribe Facebook: IEiyiiliionKids Instagram: MillionKidsTeen X: IEMillionKids Linkedln: Opal Singleton Linkedln: Million Kids BlueSky: Million Kids. bsky.social Parler: (g),MillionKids TikTok: (WillionKidsTeen National Human Trafficking Hotline: (https://humantraffickinghotline.org/en)** 1-888-3737-888 or BeFree Textline Text "BeFree" (233733) [Spanish Version](https://humantraffickinghotline.org/es) Obtenga Ayuda 24/7 Confidencial - 1-888-373-7888 Report Online Sexual Exploitation of Children: National Center for Missing & Exploited Children(http://www.missingkids.com/home)** Go to[CyberTipline](http://vmm.missingkids.com/ciethelpnow/cybertipline) or call 1- 800-THE-LOST Department of Homeland Security: Know2Protect is a Department of Homeland Security national public awareness campaign to educate and empower children, teens, parents, trusted adults and policymakers to prevent and combat online child sexual exploitation and abuse (CSEA). Explains how to report online enticement and victimization. Offers response and support resources for victims and survivors of online child sexual exploitation. Kn ow2 Protect ff you or someone you know is struggling with mental health or thoughts of suicide, call 988 or text TALK to 741-741. DONATE TO MILLION KIDS Let's stop the exploitation of our children and together say NEVER AGAIN. Your donation helps provide essential resources, research and education. Thank you for being part of the vision to keep every child safe from predators. Together, we are saving lives. (c)2026 Million Kids You received this email because you signed up on our website, joined us for a workshop or made a purchase from us. Unsubscribe Date: 2/13/2026 7:28:06 PM From To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Dangers of social media for teens examined in newdocumentary Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I thought you would be interested in this story I found on MSN: Dangers of social media for teens exarrined in new docunentary - httpsl/www.msn.corrien-us/money/other/dangers-of-social media-for-teens-exaTnkwd-in new-docun-entary/vi-AAID2A4N?ocid=socialsham Date: 2/13/2026 6:33:15 PM From To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Lawsuit challenges Meta, Google over claims they engineered addiction in children's brains Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. A bndnwk Us Angeles trial begins as attorney Mark Lanier accuses Meta and Google of intentionally designing addictive social rwdia platforms that harmmvnors. httpsl/www.foxla.coriinews/muta-google-social niedia-addiedon trial nvmrs Date: 2/13/2026 7:15:43 PM Front To: Cc: Subject: [EXTERNAL] "Parents have to wake up."Florida AG James Lthmeier is warning parents that predators are using apps like Fortnite, Snapchat, and Roblox to target Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. 02-13-2026 (P.R.D.D.C.) PARENTS FOR THE RIGHTS OF DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED CHILDREN CRAIG A. DURFEY FOUNDER OF P.R.D.D.C. P.O.BOX 2001 GARDEN GROVE, CA 92842 SOCIALEMOTIO NAL PAWS.CO M FACEBOOK: CRAIG DURFEY U.S. HOUSE OF CONGRESS H2404 - HONORING CRAIG DURFEY FOR HIS FIGHT AGAINST AUTISM ... Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California. httos:liwww.govinfo.gov/co ntent/okg/CREC-2003-03-27/ndf/CREC-2003-03-27.odf new website socialemotionalpaws.org "Parents have to wake up." I Florida AG James Uthmeier is warning parents that predators are using apps like Fortnite, Snapchat, and Roblox to target children online. He urges families to closely monitor what their kids are doing on these platforms. https.//www.facebook.com/reel/777278611505702 Date: 2/13/2026 7:06:52 PM From To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] India tightens grip on social media with newthree-hour takedown rule Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I thought you would be fiterested in this story I found on MSN: India tightens grip on social media with new three-hour takedown rule - httpsl/www.n-sn.cotrdetrus/money/other/india-tightens-grip-on-social-n-edia-with-new three-hour-takedown-rule/ar-AAI W42fq? ocid=socialshare Date: 2/13/2026 8:03:09 PM From To Subject: (EXTERNAL] DDr Lisa Strohman spent 30 years studying what harms kids, from FBI Quantico after Columbine to serving as an expert witness in New Mexico v. Meta. Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. 02-13-2026 (P.R.D.D.C.) PARENTS FOR THE RIGHTS OF DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED CHILDREN CRAIG A. DURFEY FOUNDER OF P.R.D.D.C. P.O.BOX 2001 GARDEN GROVE, CA 92842 SOCIALEMOTIONALPAWS.COM FACEBOOK: CRAIG DURFEY U.S. HOUSE OF CONGRESS H2404 - HONORING CRAIG DURFEY FOR HIS FIGHT AGAINST AUTISM ... Ms. SANCHEZ of California. httpsdlwww.govinfo.govlcontent/pka/CREC-2003-03-27/pdf/CREC-2003-03-27.pdf new website socialemotionalpaws.org Dr. Lisa Strohman spent 30 years studying what harms kids, from FBI Quantico after Columbine to serving as an expert witness in New Mexico v. Meta. Her conclusion? The phone in your child's pocket may be more dangerous than a gun on your kitchen table. At least a child knows to fear the gun. We cover CDC data, Meta's internal research, 400 girls who deleted social media in one day, and what happened when she gave her own son Snapchat. The full episode is live on YouTube, Apple, and Spotify. Comment LISA and 1 will send you the link. #FamilylTGuyPodcast https:/Iwww.facebook.com/reel/4286709198280509 Date: 2/14/2026 3:42:22 PM From: "Craig A Durfey" To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Real-noridissues sparked by video games Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I thought you would be interested in this story I found on MSN: Real -world issues sparked by video games - httpsJ/www.nsncorn%r� us/news/teclmlogy/real-world-issues-sparked-by-video-games/ss-AAl NGP99?ocid=soc6bhare#inuge=7 Date: 2/15/2026 4:31:10 PM From To Subject: [EXTERNAL] Indian teens roll their eyes at talk of a social media ban Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I thought you would be interested in this story I found on MSN: Indian teens roll their eyes at talk of a social nudia ban - httpsVhvww.n-sn eonien-us/news/world/mdian-teens-roll-their-eyes-at-talk-of-a-social-media-ban/ar-AAIW8SHd?ocid=socialshare Date: 2/15/2026 3:08:25 PM Front To Subject: [EXTERNAL] Hownuch screen time is safe for children? Warning: This email originated from outside the Oity of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and are expecting the message. I thought you would be interested in this story I found on MSN: How mach screen time is safe for children? - httpsl/www rnsacorrderr us/heahWweMess/how reach-screerrti w-is-safe-for-chiddren/ar-AA1Ly1pE?ocid=socialshare Date: 2/15/2026 4:44:28 PM From: To Subject: [EXTERNAL] Why Screen Limits Matter for Parents Too Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. l thought you would be interested in this story l found on MSN: Why Screen Linits Matter for Parents Too - http0www.rnsn.conden- us/heaWi/other/why-screeniiits-matter-for-parentss-too/ar-AAlFV IIUR?ocid=socialshare Date: 2/15/2026 5:31:57 PM Front "Craig A Durfey' To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Portugal approves restrictions on social media access for children Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I thought you would be interested in this story I found on MSN: Portugal approves restrictions on social media access for children - httpsl/www.nr,n.conier�us/news/worl/portupl-approves-restrictions-on social media-access-for-cbMren/ar-AAlWe8mE?ocid=socialshare Date: 2/15/2026 5:40:34 PM Front "Craig A Durfey" To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Portugal approves restrictions on social media access for children Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I thought you would be interested in this story I found on MSN: Portugal approves restrictions on social modia access for children - https//www.msn.eorrier�us/news/worll/portugal-approves-restrictions-on social rmdia-access-for-cbMrcr/ar-AA1We8mE?ocid=socialshare Date: 2/15/2026 5:57:51 PM From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Millennial & Gen Zparents hope to reverse screen time trend Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I thought you would be interested in this story I found on MSN: Millennial & Gen Z parents hope to reverse screen tirre trend - httpsJ/www.r rsn.corr)�eri-us/news/technology/tnMermial-gen-z-parents-hope-to-reverse-screer}tkw-trend/ar-AAI W9Y28?ocid=socialshare Date: 2/15/2026 6:26:57 PM From To Subject: [EXTERNAL] Lin>iting screen time for children isn't enough, research finds Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I thought you would be interested in this story I found on MSN: Unithg screen tirne for children isn't enough, research finds - https//www.nr,n.cotiierrus/heahWodvrAmtmg-screeti--hnr-for-children-isn t-enougli-research finds/ar-AAIUKnKq?ocid=socialshare Date: 2/15/2026 6:38:51 PM From To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] 7 Signs Your Kid Has Screen Addiction and What To Do About It Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I thought you would be interested in this story I found on MSN: 7 Signs Your Kid Has Screen Addiction and What To Do About It - https//www.nr.n.coniert-us/heakWodvr/7-signs-your-kid-has-screenaddiction and-what-to-do-about-it/ar-AAIQogzT?oeid=socialshare Date: 2/15/2026 7:41:26 PM Front To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Carlsbad joins cities banning a -bikes for riders underage 12 Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expec ft the message. I thought you would be interested in this story I found on MSN: Carlsbad joins cities banning e-bikes for riders under age 12 - https//www.msn.corrier�us/news/us/carlsbad-joins-cities-banning-e-bikes-for-riders-under-age-12/ar-AAl WoyuD?ocid=socialsharc Date: 2/18/2026 2:55:59 PM From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Why 16 Is Still Too Young for Social Media Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. httpsllopen.substack.corrdpub/screenstronglp/why-l6-is-still-too-young-for-social?utm campaigr"ost-expanded-share&irtm mcduvi-r=web Date: 2/19/2026 8:25:54 PM From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Why Better Bike Lanes Mean Better Cities Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I thought you would be interested in this story I found on MSN: Why Better Bike Lanes Mean Better Cities - https//www.rnsn eon)�en- us/autos/motorcycles/why-better-bike-lanes-nieari-better-cities/vi-AAl uqO1R?ocid=socia1share Date: 2/19/2026 8:43:16 PM From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Fw: OCTA E-Bike Safety Action Plan Update Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attacluue nts unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: OCTA Bike <bike@email-octa.net> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2026 5:30 PM To Subject: 0 OCTA E-Bike Safety Action Plan Update OCTA is taking action to improve e-bike safety in Orange County. Last year, many of you volunteered your time and provided your input and insight in support of the development of OCTA's E-bike Safety Action Plan. This plan identifies key strategy areas and priority actions with the goal of safer use of e-bikes as a mode of transportation. Check out the final plan here and learn more about how OCTA is developing an implementation strategy. Safety Education in Action r OCTA's newest e-bike safety campaign, called Round Planet, presents important rules of the road in a new and memorable way. Take a look and please share! MA 0 Copyright2026 Orange County Transportation Authority Orange County Transportation Authority 550 S. Nhin Street. PO Box 14184 Orange, CA 92863-1584, USA Click here to update yflur preferences or opt -out Date: 2/4/2026 2:13:17 PM From "Jackie Lanirandel To: "Public Cormnent" publicconnnent@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public con®nent to city council. What are you going to do about the animal shelter? You don't often get email fro Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Mayor Aitken, I published an open letter to you in the Voice of OC. Please read it. Cotniawity members will create a permanent record of how each city council number votes on this issue, we hope you will choose the right side of this issue. A vote to renew the contract without cleaning house is a vote for mismanagement, incompetence, and cruelty. Voice of OC, February 2, 2026 Lamirande: How Negligent are OC Cities in 'Ibeir Contract with the County Animal Shelter? h_ptt sJ/voiceofoc.org/2026/02/lamirande-how-negl2ent-are-oc-cities-in-their-contract-with-the-county-animal-shelter/ Dear city officials, if you hire people with a track record of dishonesty and incompetence, you're responsible for the consequences. If you are in favor of good governance and a good shelter you must make two demands: First, get rid of toxic managers. Second transparently implement the Strategic Plan. Jackie Lanirande "Be the change you want to see in the world" - Gandhi Date: 2/4/2026 7:48:53 PM From "Dea Ogata" "Public Comment" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubaleava@anaheimnet, "Non= C. Kurtz" NKurU2*auaheimne4 "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please vote NO on the Shea/Festival Center apartments — It's a safety issue! [Some people who received this message don't often get email from- Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Waning: This email originated from outside the City ofAnaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Menber, I hope you will read every word of my letter and take it seriously, because I would hate for it to one day become a part of my obituary I amwriting to you as a resident of Belsomet to ask you to please vote "NO" on the proposed apartments at the Anaheim Hills Festival Center. I lived here during the Canyon Fire 2 in 2017, and I will never forget the terrifying feeling of being evacuated. My daughter and I were frightened enough just trying to get our dogs and us out - without the assistance of iriy husband or son to help, as they were at work and couldn't get back home to us because there was a four mile perimeter that was only letting residents go out ofthe area. But even that wasn't enough! We were stuck in my car alone, scared, watching the smoke coning closer towards us from two directions, and we literally did not move for over an hour. It wasn't just "traffic" - it was a total standstill. There was no place to go. When we finally managed to get to the other side ofthe 91 to meet up with the rest of our family, it looked like Armageddon all around us. Helicopters were diving into the river every two minutes The sky was an eerie, orange tinted black color. And we literally watched as the flames jumped the lanes ofthe 91 freeway and began roving towards causing even more devastation. The 241 and 91 even freeways had to be closed. Where was our "escape route" then? The thought of adding hundreds of new apartments and about 1000+ more people to that exact same escape route is terrifying to those of us who have actually been in that situation. Our only escape route could take us hours, and that's time we just don't have. The reports for this project say that adding these cars will "only" add about 7 ninutes to the evacuation time. That's a LIE. I CHALLENGE anyone who helped to create that report to conic sit with me in the snarled mess oftraffic, if God forbid we have another fire lice the one in 2017. Because when you're already stuck for three hours and the fire is moving toward you, 7 minutes is a lifetime - or a death sentence. We don't have extra roads or "secret" ways out ofthe Hills; we all end up on the same few streets, in the same few lanes. We virtually have one way in and one way out. Adding more people to a neighborhood that is already a bottleneck during a fire just feels like a tragedy waiting to happen. And I'mbegging you as a mother- please don't be responsible forkilling my children. I don't care what part of Anaheimanyone lives in, east or west - we are NEIGHBORS. Does anybody really think that it's worth risking people's fives just to add more outrageously expensive lrousurg? I understand that the city needs housing, but it shouldn't be built in a place where people are already struggling to get outs arely. And ifyou're going to add more housing, try making it more AFFORDABLE first! Please don't make an existing danger even worse just for anew development_ We are asking you to prioritize the lives and safety ofthe PEOPLE who already live here and pay taxes here. Don't be selfish with our lives. Sincerely, Dea and Scott Ogata SentfromDea's iPhone 10-1 Date: 2/5/2026 9:24:15 AM Frog "Susan medart" "Public Comment" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubaleava@anaheimnet, "Nonlria C. Kurtz" NKurU2*auaheimne4 "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheitnnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please vote NO on the Shea/Festival Center apartments — It's a safety issue [You don't often get email fro Learn why this is important at https:/, aka.nis/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City ofAnaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Member, I amwriting to you as a resident of [Your Neighborhood] to ask you to please vote "No" on the proposed apartments at the Anaheim Hills Festival Center. I lived here during the Canyon Fire 2 in 2017, and i will never forget the feeling ofbeing stuck in my car, watching the smoke get closer, and literally not moving for over an hour. It wasn't just "traffic" it was a total standstill. The thought of adding hundreds ofnew apartments and about 1000+more people to that exact same escape route is terrifying to those ofus who have actually been in that situation. The reports for this project say that adding these cars will "only" add about 7 minutes to the evacuation time. But when you're already stuck for three hours and the fire is moving toward you, 7 minutes is a lifetime. We don't have extra roads or "secret" ways out of the Hills; we all end up on the same few lanes. Adding more people to a neighborhood that is already a bottleneck during a fire just feels like a tragedy waiting to happen. I understand that the city needs housing, but it shouldn't be built in a place where people are already struggling to get out safely. Please don't make an existing danger even worse just for a new development. We are asking you to prioritize the lives and safety ofthe people who already live here and pay taxes here. Sincerely, FYI I am75 in March. The last evacuation took me hours to get outgoing over Knol Ranch road down to the 55 freeway! Date: 2/5/20261:45:28 PM From: "Veronica Davis" "Public Comment" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Nonrrra C. Kurtz" NKuttz*anaheimnet, "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Vote NO on Shea/Festival project You don't often get enrul from Learn why this is important Wanting: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Subject: Please vote NO on the Shea/Festival Center apartments — It's a safety issue Dear Council Member, I am writing to you as a resident of [Your Neighborhood] to ask you to please vote 'No" on the proposed apartments at the Anabeim Hills Festival Center. I lived here during the Canyon Fire 2 in 2017, and I will never forget the feeling of being stuck in my car, watching the srmke get closer, and literally not rmving for over an hour. It wasn't just'Vaflic"—it was a total standstill. The thought of adding hundreds ofnew apartments and about 1000+ tmre people to that exact sane escape route is terrifying to those of us who have actually been in that situation For those council members who live in this area I can't believe you would be for this. I'm sure you have seen 1st hand how terrible the traffic is heading towards the 91 fwy on Weir canyon right past Serrano. It is horrible with all the people cutting across Serrano to get onto weir canyon so they can get on to the freeway. For us residents who five off of Weir Canyon just trying to get to the festival center or the Savi Ranch shopping center is terrible. Our street backs up so much and now add in a fire that would make it even worse. The reports for this project say that adding these cars will "only" add about 7 n utes to the evacuation titre. But when you're already stuck for three hours and the fire is rnovtng toward you, 7 nn k tes is a lifetine. We don't have extra roads or "secret" ways out ofthe Hills; we all end up on the sane few lanes. Adding rmre people to a neighborhood that is already a bottleneck during a fire just feels like a tragedy waiting to happen I understand that the city needs housing but it shouldn't be bur& in a place where people are ah-eady struggling to get out safely. Please don't make an existing danger even worse just for a new development. We are asking you to prioritize the lives and safety of the people who already live here and pay taxes here. Sincerely, Veronica Mirarnontes-Davis Date: 2/5/20261:49:52 PM From: "Public Comment" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: C-,eon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Norma C. Kurtz" NKuttz*anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please vote NO on the Shea/Festival Center apartments - It's a safety issue You don't often get enrol from Learn whthis is =ortant Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Member, I am writing to you as a resident of Canyon Crest Neighborhood to ask you to please vote "No" on the proposed apartments at the Anaheim Hills Festival Center. I lived here during the Canyon Fire 2 in 2017, and I will never forget the feeling of being stuck in my car, watching the smoke get closer, and literally not moving for over an hour. It wasn't just "traffc"—it was a total standstill. The thought of adding hundreds of new apartments and about 1000+ more people to that exact same escape route is terrifying to those of us who have actually been in that situation. The reports for this project say that adding these cars will "only" add about 7 minutes to the evacuation time. But when you're already stuck for three hours and the fire is moving toward you, 7 minutes is a lifetime. We don't have extra roads or "secret" ways out of the Hills; we all end up on the same few lanes. Adding more people to a neighborhood that is already a bottleneck during a fire just feels like a tragedy waiting to happen. The bottlenecks that already exist are insane — taking sometimes 40+ minutes to go less than 3 miles during rush hour. I understand that the city needs housing, but it shouldn't be built in a place where people are already struggling to get out safely. Please don't make an existing danger even worse just for a new development. We are asking you to prioritize the lives and safety of the people who already live here and pay taxes here. Sincerely, Dianne Markis Date: 2/5/2026 2:25:52 PM From "Hetan Sangani" "Public Comment" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Nonlria C. Kurtz" NKurU2*auaheimne4 "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please vote NO on the Shea/Festival Center apartments — It's a safety issue [You don't often get email from am why this is important at httns •J/aka.rns/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City ofAnaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Menber, I amwriting to you as a resident of Anaheimllilla to ask you to please vote "No" on the proposed apartments at the Anaheim Hills Festival Center. I lived here during the Canyon Fire 2 in 2017, and I will never forget the feeling ofbeing stuck in my car, watching the smoke get closer, and literally not moving for over an hour. it wasn't just "traffic" it was a total standstill. The thought of adding hundreds of new apartments and about 1000+rmre people to that exact same escape route is terrifying to those ofus who have actually been in that situation. The reports for this project say that adding these cars will "only" add about 7 minutes to the evacuation time. But when you're already stuck for three hours and the fire is moving toward you, 7 minutes is a lifetime. We don't have extra roads or "secret" ways out of the Hills; we all end up on the same few lanes. Adding more people to a neighborhood that is already a bottleneck during a fire just feels like a tragedy waiting to happen. I understand that the city needs housing, but it shouldn't be built in a place where people are already struggling to get out safely. Pleas e don't make an existing danger even worse just for a new development. We are asking you to prioritize the lives and safety ofthe people who already live here and pay taxes here. Sincerely, Hetan Sansani Sent fromnry iPhone Date: 2/5/2026 3:33:58 PM From nichaelbrenna "Public Conrnent" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Non= C. Kurtz" NKurU2*auaheimne4 "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Concerns about the Festival Center Project and Wildfire Safety [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at httns://aka.ms/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City ofAnaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Menber, I moved to Anaheim Hills because it is a beautiful, family -oriented corrmamity, but I am very concerned about the proposed Shea/Festival Center apartment project. Since nerving here, I've learned that our neighborhood is in a high -risk fire zone with very limited ways to get out. i was shocked to read that it already takes over three hours to evacuate this area during an emergency. Adding over 1,000 more people and their cars to our streets seems like a huge risk to everyone's safety. The project's environmental report admits that these new apartments will make evacuation times even longer. As a parent, I think about what would happen if a fire broke out while I was trying to get my [kids/pets/elderly parents] to safety. Ifthe roads are already failing, adding hundreds more cars into the mixwill make a bad situation impossible. It feels like the city is hoping for the best rather than planning for the worst. I amnot against new housing in general, but it has to be built in the right places. Putting high -density housing at a known bottleneck in a fire zone is not responsible I am asking you to please put our safety first and vote "No" on this project until we have a real solution for getting people out of the Hills safely. Sincerely, [Your Name] [Your Address] Date: 2/5/2026 6:26:02 PM From "rmrtha'� "Public Continent" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubaleava@anaheimnet, "Non= C. Kurtz" NKurtz@auaheimnet, "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Safety FIRST, Vote NO Festival Center development [You don't often get email fro am why this is important at httns://aka.ms/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City ofAnaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Member, I am writing to you as a resident ofhidden ridge (weir canyon and oak) to urge you to please vote "No" on the proposed apartments at the Anaheim Hills Festival Center. I lived here since 1998 when this area was being developed and to say the least it is over populated for our safety. During the Canyon Fire 2 in 2017, and I will never forget the feeling ofbeing stuck in my car, trying to get out of my house and getting my momdown the street and my 3 kids at Running Springs. The school scenario was scary, the bused the kids out and they went down Serrano and the buses were stuck in traffic and the poor kids were watching the fire bum close to them All because ofthe congestion on the streets. We were all frightened and not being able to get out ofa true fire hell. I recall watching the smoke get closer, and literally not roving for over an hour. It wasn't just "traffic" it was a total standstill. The thought of adding hundreds of new apartments and about 1000+more people to that exact same escape route is terrifying to those ofus who have actually been in that situation. The reports for this project say that adding these cars will "only" add about 7 minutes to the evacuation time. But when you're already stuck for three hours and the fire is moving toward you, 7 minutes is a lifetime. We don't have extra roads or "secret" ways out ofthe Hills; we all end up on the same few lanes. Adding more people to a neighborhood that is already a bottleneck during a firejust feels like a tragedy waiting to happen. I understand that the city needs housing, but it shouldn't be built in a place where people are already struggling to get out safely. Please don't make an existing danger even worse just for a new development. We are asking you to prioritize the lives and safety ofthe people who already live here and pay taxes here. Sincerely, Martha Vega God Bless, Martha LL Date: 2/6/2026 6:25:40 AM Frog "Joyce Standrod" "Public Continent" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Non= C. Kurtz" NKurU2*auaheimne4 "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@ naheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Logic and Safety: Why the Festival Center Project is a Mistake [You don't often get email fro Learn why this is important at https 1/aka.ms/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City ofAnaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Member, I amwriting to ask you to vote "No" on the Anaheim Hills Festival Center apartment project. You don't need to be a traffic expert to see that Santa Ana Canyon Road is already at its limit. Most days, just getting to the store or work is a challenge. The idea that we can add over 400 apartments and about 1300 people to this area without creating a disaster during a wildfire evacuation just doesn't pass the "common sense" test. The city's own reports admit that it already takes residents over three hours to get out during a fire. To then say that adding another 7 minutes of delay is "not a big deal" is incredibly frustrating to those of us who live here. If a bucket is already overflowing, you don't keep pouring more water into it and say it's fine. By approving this, the city is basically admitting the evacuation plan is broken but choosing to make it even more crowded anyway. We need our leaders to look at the reality ofour streets, not just the numbers on a developer's spreadsheet. Please do the responsible thing and protect the residents who are already here. We need better ways to get out ofthe Hills, not more people trapped in them Please vote "No" on this project. Sincerely, Joyce Standrod Sent fromnry iPhone Date: 2/6/2026 6:42:40 AM From "Heather Taylor" "Public Comment" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Nortna C. Kurtz" NKuttz*anaheimnet, "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheitnnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please vote NO on the Shea/Festival Center apartments — It's a safety issue [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City ofAnaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Menber, I amwriting to you as a resident of [Your Neighborhood] to ask you to please vote "No" on the proposed apartments at the Anaheim Hills Festival Center. I lived here during the Canyon Fire 2 in 2017, and i will never forget the feeling ofbeing stuck in my car, watching the smoke get closer, and literally not moving for over an hour. It wasn't just "traffic" it was a total standstill. The thought of adding hundreds ofnew apartments and about 1000+more people to that exact same escape route is terrifying to those ofus who have actually been in that situation. The reports for this project say that adding these cars will "only" add about 7 minutes to the evacuation time. But when you're already stuck for three hours and the fire is moving toward you, 7 minutes is a lifetime. We don't have extra roads or "secret" ways out of the Hills; we all end up on the same few lanes. Adding more people to a neighborhood that is already a bottleneck during a fire just feels like a tragedy waiting to happen. I understand that the city needs housing, but it shouldn't be built in a place where people are already struggling to get out safely. Please don't make an existing danger even worse just for a new development. We are asking you to prioritize the lives and safety ofthe people who already live here and pay taxes here. Sincerely, Heather Ta for Date: 2/6/2026 9:26:16 AM From "Dana Sirotnak" "Public Conrnent" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Catios A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubaleava@anaheimnet, "Norma C. Kurtz" NKurb2*anaheimnet, "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please vote NO on the Shea/Festival Center apartments — It's a safety issue [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.rns/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City ofAnaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Please Council Member, I amwriting to you as a resident of to ask you to please vote "No" on the proposed apartments at the Anaheim Hills Festival Center. I lived since the fire in 2008 and experienced the fire that suddenly jumped the freeway from Corona and took down the apartments right by my street burning a tree down directly behind my house, and some houses up the hill by the water tower. People lost everything. I never thought the fire could reach my house but those Santa Ana winds are horrible when they kick up when not if. The core city of Anaheimshould not try to continue to earn money off ofthe Anaheim Hills area the way that they do. In the end it's all about the money I realize but we cannot handle anymore people here. During the Canyon Fire 2 in 2017I had to evacuate and stay at friends's home. My son's truck was stuck on Santa Ana Canyon for over two hours going 3 miles with dogs and things in the car and if the fire was sweeping through, he would've been hurt along with thousands of others who were jammed along the Freeway. Also, how could any firefighters even maneuver because there is a fire station right there? Even police cars couldn't get in and out ofthe anaheim hills police station. Unfortunately, no one knew the 91 freeway would be such a horrendous trip headed toward the inland empire on a daily basis people funneling constantly through our part of town. My own street has turned into a mini freeway in which it is backed up often. During the state of a big emergency, we would have major problem; out in this area. And I know I'mnot speaking for this tiny area of Anaheim Hills but also the Yorba Linda side of the 91 freeway down into the back into Orange. I know you're getting a lot of copy and paste letters, but please pay attention because it's not a game. It's not just oh let's build some nice new hous es or some little apartments where people could live. There arc plenty of other towns. Please do not let greed for C be the guide. Sincerely, Dana Cody Hinkle (Miss Anabeun 1981 J LL) Date: 2/6/202611:13:06 AM From "Sue Hennings" To: "Public Conmmnt" publiccomrneirt@anahehnnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Pickleball Courts [You don't often get email fro am why this is important at his://aka.rm/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. It seems many cities are building pickleball courts. I five in east anaheim across fromYorba Regional Park and the baseball fields. There is open land that would be perfect for pickleball courts. The only courts I know of are the two inside the East Anaheim Hills senior center. Two courts are not sufficient for the number of people who want to play, plus the gym is used for other activities. I have irony friends who five in Yorba Linda and they have added courts in many neighborhoods. Wondering and hoping Anaheim would consider adding courts at this location. Thank you, Susan Hennings Sent fromnry iPhone Date: 2/7/2026 3:28:19 PM From "ALBERT MURPIW' To: "Public Continent" publiccomtmnt(kanaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] AnaheimIMs Festival Project [You don't often get email fro Learn why this is important at h_pt s://aka.ms/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Waming: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council: I have been a resident of Anaheim Hills since 1988. The fire safety issues in Anaheim Hills are as great or greater today as they were in 2024, 2017 before that, 2012, 2007 and 2006 before that. Traffic has continued to increase fromthe 91/55 freeway drivers using Serrano Ave & Santa Ana Cyn Rd. as a bypass. There are only 3 ways out ofthe Hills - there is Serrano Ave to the west, Imperial Hwy to the North & West and Weir Cyn to the east. Whenever a brush fire happens, it comes fromthe East so that elinrinates Weir Cyn Rd as an egress - there is no evacuation option to the south as Fremont Canyon elirmnates option. I was evacuated in 2017 and it took me 45 minutes in bumper to bumper traffic to go 3 miles along Serrano Ave. The winds were blowing hard that day and the fire department measurement calculated the fire moving at 9 miles per minute. The fire department does keep things as safe as possible with fire watch and other preemptive measures but the winds are unforgiving. I choose to vote for safety here over increased housing. The recent Anaheim Hills project at Deer Canyon was denied due to severe fire safety issues in this area. This project at the Festival Center is no different - it creates more traffic in an area that is already gridlocked on a mostly daily basis and is less than one mile fromthe denied Deer Canyon Project. The fact that it is on developed land vs undeveloped land is meaningless -the wind doesn't really care; remember 9 miles per minute. It will bum through property either way. This area and all ofthe Hills are a potential fire trap if the right conditions are present. I ask you to do the right thing and deny the AnaheimHills Festival Project for the safety of our Hills res idents. Sincerely, Al Murphy Sent from my iPad Date: 2/9/202611:20:30 AM From "Reem" "Public Comment" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Nonrrra C. Kurtz" NKurU2*auaheimne4 "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheitnnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please vote NO on the Shea/Festival Center apartments — It's a safety issue [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City ofAnaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Member, I am writing to you as a resident of Anaheimto ask you to please vote "No" on the proposed apartments at the AnaheirnHills Festival Center. I lived here during the Canyon Fire 2 in 2017, and I will never forget the feeling ofbeing stuck in my car, watching the smoke get closer, and literally not rnoving for over an hour. It wasn't just "traffic"it was a total standstill. The thought of adding hundreds of new apartments and about 1000+ Wore people to that exact sane escape route is terrifying to those ofus who have actually been in that situation. The reports for this project say that adding these cars will "only" add about 7 minutes to the evacuation time. But when you're already stuck for three hours and the fire is moving toward you, 7 minutes is a lifetime. We don't have extra roads or "secret" ways out of the Hills; we all end up on the same few lanes. Adding more people to a neighborhood that is already a bottleneck during a fire just feels like a tragedy waiting to happen. I understand that the city needs housing, but it shouldn't be built in a place where people are already struggling to get out safely. Please don't make an existing danger even worse just for a new development. We are asking you to prioritize the lives and safety ofthe people who already live here and pay taxes here. Sincerely, Reem Date: 2/9/20261:55:58 PM From "cwalkeranahein#arming@gmail.com" cwalkeranaheimplanning@gmail.com, "jtranmartin@gmail com" jtranmarlin@gmail.com, "abgorashi@gmail com" abgorashi@gmail com, "Michelle Lieberman" mlieberman92805@gmail.com, "luisbperez@outlook.com" luisbperez@outlooLcon�"conunissioneracastro@gmail.com" To: comnissioneracastro@gmail.com,"conmissionerdeirdrekelly@gmail.com" cormAssionerdeirdrekelly@gniail.com, "Public Comrent" publiccomment@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Norma C. Kurtz" NKutz*anaheimnet, "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: AL] Vote NO - Renaissance Canyon Acres Project (233 S. Quintana Dr.) DEV2025-00027 You don't often get email from Learn mdjythis is unportant Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Mayor and Council Members, and Planning Commissioners, I am writing as an Anaheim Hills resident to respectfully urge you to vote NO on the proposed Renaissance Canyon Acres development located at 2335. Quintana Drive, Anaheim, CA 92807 (DEV2025-00027). While I understand the City's need for housing, this project raises serious concerns regarding traffic congestion, wildfire evacuation safety, and neighborhood compatibility that must be addressed before any approval is considered. According to the developer's own materials, this project would introduce 140 new vehicles into an area that already functions as a traffic and evacuation choke point. Quintana Drive is a narrow corridor with no viable alternate routes, and it serves as the sole exit for four narrow private roads, including Trail Drive homes, all merging into S. Quintana Drive. There has been no credible evidence presented that existing Canyon Acres traffic conditions have ever matched this level of added volume, nor that the roadway can safely accommodate it —especially during an emergency. I lived through Canyon Fire 2 in 2017 and experienced complete gridlock while smoke was approaching, sitting in my car for over an hour without moving. This was not a minor inconvenience —it was frightening and dangerous. Project reports suggest the added traffic would increase evacuation time by "only" seven minutes; however, when residents are already trapped for hours during a wildfire, seven minutes can be the difference between safety and tragedy. Beyond public safety, this development is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Although the proposed project zoning is labeled Low Density (115-2), the existing RS-2 homes were not built to the scale, massing, or setback intensity proposed here. In addition, the majority of the project property is currently zoned RH-2 and abuts similar estate -style RH-2 zoning. A 25-unit project does not blend with the surrounding single-family homes and does not reflect the established character orvalues of the community. Growth should never come at the expense of public safety. Approving additional density before addressing evacuation routes, traffic infrastructure, and emergency response capacity places existing residents at unacceptable risk. Should you find it helpful, I would welcome the opportunity for you or your staff to visit the site and surrounding streets to better understand the physical constraints and safety concerns outlined above. I respectfully ask you to prioritize safety, infrastructure, and community compatibility by voting NO on the Renaissance Canyon Acres project. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Paul Nasij Anaheim Hills Resident Date: 2/10/2026 8:58:49 AM From "Chris Moyers" - To: "Public Comment" publiccomurnt@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please Vote NO— Renaissance Canyon Acres Project (233 S. Quintana Dr.) DEV2025-00027 You don't often get ema� from Learn wk�miportant Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Mayor and Council Members, and Planning Commissioners, I am writing as an Anaheim Hills resident to respectfully urge you to vote NO on the proposed Renaissance Canyon Acres development located at 233 S. Quintana Drive, Anaheim, CA 92807(DEV2025-00027). While I understand the City's need for housing, this project raises serious concerns regarding traffic congestion, wildfire evacuation safety, and neighborhood compatibility that must be addressed before any approval is considered. According to the developer's own materials, this project would introduce 140 new vehicles into an area that already functions as a traffic and evacuation choke point. Quintana Drive is a narrow corridor with no viable alternate routes, and it serves as the sole exitforfour narrow private roads, including Trail Drive homes, all merging into S. Quintana Drive. There has been no credible evidence presented that existing Canyon Acres traffic conditions have ever matched this level of added volume, nor that the roadway can safely accommodate it —especially during an emergency. I lived through Canyon Fire 2 in 2017 and experienced complete gridlock while smoke was approaching, sitting in my car for over an hourwithout moving. This was not a minor inconvenience —it was frightening and dangerous. Project reports suggest the added trafficwould increase evacuation time by "only" seven minutes; however, when residents are already trapped for hours during a wildfire, seven minutes can be the difference between safety and tragedy. Beyond public safety, this development is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Although the proposed project zoning is labeled Low Density (RS-2), the existing RS-2 homes were not built to the scale, massing, or setback intensity proposed here. In addition, the majority of the project property is currently zoned RH-2 and abuts similar estate -style RH-2 zoning. A 25-unit project does not blend with the surrounding single-family homes and does not reflect the established character orvalues of the community. Growth should never come at the expense of public safety. Approving additional density beforeaddressing evacuation routes, traffic infrastructure, and emergency response capacity places existing residents at unacceptable risk. Should you find it helpful, I would welcome the opportunity for you or your staff to visitthe site and surrounding streets to better understand the physical constraints and safety concerns outlined above. I respectfully ask you to prioritize safety, infrastructure, and community compatibility by voting NO on the Renaissance Canyon Acres project. Thank you for yourtime and consideration. Sincerely, Christine Abbey Anaheim Hills Resident Sent from my Phone Date: 2/10/202610:34:12 AM From: "Elena Morcelin" "cmlkeranahein#arnvng@gmail.com" cwmlkeranaheimplanning@gmail.com, "jtranmartin@gmail com" jtranmartin@gmail.com, "abgorashi@gmail com" abgorashi@gnrail.com, "Michelle Lieberman" mlieberman92805@gmail.com "luisbperez@outlook.com" luisbperez@outlooLcon�"conunissioneracastro@gmail.com" To: comnissioneracastro@gmail.com,"conmissionerdeirdrekelly@gnrail.com" cormAssionerdeirdrekelly@gnrail.com, "Public Conrnent" publiccomment@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Norma C. Kurtz" NKrutz*anaheimnet, "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: AL] Please Vote NO — Renaissance Canyon Acres Project (233 S. Quintana Dr.) DEV2025-00027 You don't often get email from Leant why this is irmortaut Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Mayor and Council Members, and Planning Commissioners, I am writing as an Anaheim Hills resident to respectfully urge you to vote NO on the proposed Renaissance Canyon Acres development located at 233 S. Quintana Drive, Anaheim, CA 92807 (DEV2025-00027). While I understand the City's need for housing, this project raises serious concerns regarding traffic congestion, wildfire evacuation safety, and neighborhood compatibility that must be addressed before any approval is considered. According to the developer's own materials, this project would introduce 140 new vehicles into an area that already functions as a traffic and evacuation choke point. Quintana Drive is a narrow corridor with no viable alternate routes, and it serves as the sole exit for four narrow private roads, including Trail Drive homes, all merging into S. Quintana Drive. There has been no credible evidence presented that existing Canyon Acres traffic conditions have ever matched this level of added volume, nor that the roadway can safely accommodate it —especially during an emergency. I lived through Canyon Fire 2 in 2017 and experienced complete gridlock while smoke was approaching, sitting in my car for over an hour without moving. This was not a minor inconvenience —it was frightening and dangerous. Project reports suggest the added traffic would increase evacuation time by "only" seven minutes; however, when residents are already trapped for hours during a wildfire, seven minutes can be the difference between safety and tragedy. Beyond public safety, this development is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Although the proposed project zoning is labeled Low Density (RS-2), the existing RS-2 homes were not built to the scale, massing, or setback intensity proposed here. In addition, the majority of the project property is currently zoned RH-2 and abuts similar estate -style RH-2 zoning. A 25-unit project does not blend with the surrounding single-family homes and does not reflect the established character or values of the community. Growth should never come at the expense of public safety. Approving additional density before addressing evacuation routes, traffic infrastructure, and emergency response capacity places existing residents at unacceptable risk. Should you find it helpful, I would welcome the opportunity for you or your staff to visit the site and surrounding streets to better understand the physical constraints and safety concerns outlined above. I respectfully ask you to prioritize safety, infrastructure, and community compatibility by voting NO on the Renaissance Canyon Acres project. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Elena Morcelin Anaheim Hills Residents Elena Elenz Morcelin Es . Date: 2/11/2026 8:13:47 AM From "Joan" — "Public Comment" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Non= C. Kurtz" NKurU2*auaheimne4 "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please vote NO on the Shea/Festival Center apartments — It's a safety issue [You don't often get email from = Learn why this is important at httns://aka.ms/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City ofAnaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Menber, I am writing to you as a resident of Anaheimto ask you to please vote "No" on the proposed apartments at the AnaheirnHills Festival Center. I lived here during the Canyon Fire 2 in 2017, and I will never forget the feeling ofbeing stuck in my car, watching the smoke get closer, and literally not rnoving for over an hour. It wasn't just "traffic"it was a total standstill. The thought of adding hundreds of new apartments and about 1000+ Wore people to that exact sane escape route is terrifying to those ofus who have actually been in that situation. The reports for this project say that adding these cars will "only" add about 7 minutes to the evacuation time. But when you're already stuck for three hours and the fire is moving toward you, 7 minutes is a lifetime. We don't have extra roads or "secret" ways out of the Hills; we all end up on the same few lanes. Adding more people to a neighborhood that is already a bottleneck during a fire just feels like a tragedy waiting to happen. I understand that the city needs housing, but it shouldn't be built in a place where people are already struggling to get out safely. Please don't make an existing danger even worse just for a new development. We are asking you to prioritize the lives and safety ofthe people who already live here and pay taxes here. Sincerely, Joan Guaderrarm Date: 2/11/2026 8:55:43 AM From "Public Comment" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Norma C. Kurtz" NKurfz*anaheimnet, "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please vote NO on the Shea/Festival Center apartments — It's a safety issue You don't often get erna:l from MLeam why this is importatrt Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Member, I amwriting to you as a resident of Anaheimto ask you to please vote 'No" on the proposed apartments at the Anabeim Hills Festival Center. I lived here during the Canyon Fire 2 in 2017, and I will never forget the feeling of being stuck in my car, watching the stroke get closer, and literally not roving for over an hour. It wasn't just '9rafc"—it was a total standstill. The thought of adding hundreds of new aparttitents and about 1000+ snore people to that exact same escape route is terrifying to those of us who have actually been in that situation The reports for this project say that adding these cars will "only" add about 7 mmnutes to the evacuation time. But when you're already stuck for three hours and the fire is tmving toward you, 7 nvnutes is a lifetime. We don't have extra roads or "secret" ways out of the Hills; we all end up on the same few lanes. Adding tore people to a neighborhood that is already a bottleneck during a fire just feels like a tragedy waiting to happen I understand that the city needs housing, but it shouldn't be built in a place where people are already strtWJntg to get out safely. Please don't make an existing danger even worse just for a new development. We are asking you to prioritize the lives and safety of the people who already live here and pay taxes here. Sincerely, Date: 2/11/2026 2:29:23 PM From: "Doug Vu" — "Public Comment" publiccomment@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubaleava" NRubaleava@anabeimnet, "Norma C. Kurtz" NKuttz*anaheimnet, "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please vote NO on Shea/Festival Center Apartments —Public Safety at Risk You don't often get enuff from Learn why this is i Mortant Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Member, I am writing to you as a resident of Anaheim and a homeowner on Basil Street in the East Anaheim Fills neighborhood to respectfully ask that you ,,ote "No" on the proposed apartments at the Anaheim Hills Festival Center. I liked here during the Canyon Fire 2 in 2017, and I will never forget the fear of not being able to get to my children, who were stuck at school for hours during the evacuation. The roads were at a complete standstill. It wasn't simply traffic — it was gridlock. And parents like me felt helpless, unable to reach our kids during a rapidly escalating emergency. The project reports state that the additional vehicles would add approximately seven minutes to evacuation times. However, when residents are already facing hours of congestion while a wildfire advances, seven minutes can feel like a lifetime. Our neighborhood does not haw multiple exit routes —we all funnel onto the same limited roadways. Adding hundreds of new apartments and more than a thousand additional residents to an area that is already becoming a bottleneck during emergencies raises serious safety concerns. I understand that Anaheim needs housing, but development should not come at the expense of public safety. This location has already proven vulnerable during wildfire evacuations. Please prioritize the safety of existing residents and carefully consider the real -world evacuation risks before approving this project. Thank you for your time and consideration Sincerely, Dong Vu Date: 2/13/2026 10:27:50 AM From: "Rep. Lou Correa" repcorrea@mail8.housecommunications.gov To: "Public Comment" publiccomment@anaheim.net Subject: [EXTERNAL] Stop by my Youth Resource and Job Fair! Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. DOWN7 .:)RANGE COUNTo LOU C `- R R EA REPRESENTATIVE CALIFORNIA'S 46'" DISTRICT Dear Neighbor, Our community is stronger when our children have access to the resources they need to thrive. That's why my office is hosting a youth resource and job fair right here in Santa Ana —to connect our kids from grades 9 through 12 to local organizations offering mentorship, internships, employment preparedness, resume assistance, and so much more to help plan their future after high school. If this is something that interests you, or someone you know, please RSVP by filling out THIS FORM. We'll be holding the event from 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM on Saturday, February 28th. You can get more information about this event by calling my Santa Ana office at (714) 559-6190. 1W LOU CORREI REPRESENTATIVE 0"- CALIFORNIA'S 46- DISTRICT YOUTH IRREEM B RESOURIE FAIR 0 THIS YOUTH CAREER & RESOURCE FAIR CONNECTS HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS (GRADES 9-12) WITH LOCAL ORGANIZATIONS OFFERING MENTORSHIP, INTERNSHIPS, EMPLOYMENT PREPAREDNESS, SCHOLARSHIPS, RESUME ASSISTANCE, CAREER PATHWAYS, EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES, AND COMMUNITY RESOURCES TO HELP PLAN THEIR FUTURE AFTER HIGH SCHOOL. SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 289 2026 10:00 AM -12:00 PM DELH1 CENTER SOS E CENTRAL AVE, SANTA ANA, CA 92707 sk I@ lFYOU HAVEANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL OUR OFFICE: 714-559-6190 A& ft 0 My office is here to help you —if you have questions about federal resources or need help with a federal agency, or would like to join us for one of our upcoming events, give us a call at (714) 559-6190. Sincerely, Rep. Lou Correa Member of Congress Sign up for my newsletter to get updates on this issue and others! C 0 Visit my websiteto learn more! correa.house- aov Contact Me Washington D.C. 2082 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 (202) 225-2965 Santa Ana Rancho Santiago Community College Building 2323 N. Broadway, Suite 319 Santa Ana, CA 92706 (714) 559-6190 Unsubscribe from future messages. Date: 2/15/202610:17:45 AM From "Chris McKeen" To: "Public Cominent" publiccomment@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Renaissance Canyon Acres You don't often get ema> from Learn whthis is mVortant Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the tuessage. Dear Mayor and Council Members, and Planning Commissioners, We are writing as Anaheim Hills residents to respectfully urge you to vote NO on the proposed Renaissance Canyon Acres development located at 233 S. Quintana Drive, Anaheim, CA 92807 (DEV2025-00027). This project raises serious concerns regarding traffic congestion, wildfire evacuation safety, and neighborhood compatibility that must be addressed before any approval is considered. According to the developer's own materials, this project would introduce 140 new vehicles into an area that already functions as a traffic and evacuation choke point. Quintana Drive is a narrow unlit corridor with no viable alternate routes, and it serves as the sole exit for four narrow private roads, all merging into S. Quintana Drive. There has been no credible evidence presented that the current roadway can accommodate an increase in traffic, especially during an emergency. Formal studies should be completed prior to the approval of any future development. We have lived through several fire threats in this area and are acutely aware of just how inadequate even the existing roads are for evacuation purposes. Being trapped in afire is extremely scary and dangerous and the city has a responsibility to maintain a level of development that does not add even more congestion to the already limited road capacity. Living in this area with large spaces of overgrown and ill maintained brush has created a fire hazard that the city has repeatedly ignored. Along with the heavily landscaped grounds that are being maintained by homeowners, there are very large areas of hillside that are Not being maintained by Homeowners Associations in the area. Although these entities have been contacted on numerous occasions, they have failed to keep their homeowner's accountability for maintaining overgrown brush. As for the city, we have repeatedly contacted the fire authority and had them visit our home and personally view the blatant fire hazards in our area. Through multiple letters, contacts and personal visits, the city and fire authority has repeatedly failed to address or mitigate major fire risks in the area. This Leaves us with an increased risk of fire and now to add additional traffic to a small country road is not responsible behavior. In addition, several years ago on Ramsgate Drive there was a collapse of several homes when the slope failed. The landslide ended up blocking much of the road on Hidden Grove. To date, the city has neither cleared the dirt nor required the owner to clear the dirt blocking a good portion of the Hidden Grove Road. In fact, when the street was repaved, they repaved around the slide area blocking the road even further. Pure negligence on the part of the city. And, here we are again, with a city that not only doesn't maintain an area for safety but now wants to add even more traffic to an existing limited roadway. This proposed development is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Although the proposed project zoning is labeled Low Density (RS-2), the existing RS-2 homes were not built to the scale, massing, or setback intensity proposed here. In addition, the majority of the project property is currently zoned RH-2 and abuts similar estate -style RH-2 zoning. A 25-unit project does not blend with the surrounding single- family homes and does not reflect the established character or values of the community. We would be happy to meet any city representatives on site to show them first-hand how limited the access is in this area. We respectfully ask you to prioritize safety, infrastructure, and community compatibility by voting NO on the Renaissance Canyon Acres project. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Chris McKeen and Kent Koepsell Y McKEEN HHRYS HT�HH A� AWAY I— MdCs C— McK— aNrorn4 v.,cmw. 714.423.2561 714.308.6055 cw RRLL.� R13W C_CdCE McK¢FN.orm LA &RLL�t�013Y471D �.CHMMcKR .rnm Date: 2/15/202612:08:26 PM From "charles porter"_ "Public Comment" publiccoru rent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "No tna C. Kurtz" NKurtz@auaheimnet, "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please vote NO on the Shea/Festival Center apartments — It's a safety issue [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at httns://aka.ms/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City ofAnaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Menber, i am writing to you as a resident of Anaheimto ask you to please vote "No" on the proposed apartments at the AnahennHills Festival Center. I lived here during the Canyon Fire 2 in 2017, and I will never forget the feeling ofbeing stuck in my car, watching the smoke get closer, and literally not rnoving for over an hour. It wasn't just "traffic"it was a total standstill. The thought of adding hundreds of new apartments and about 1000+ Wore people to that exact sane escape route is terrifying to those ofus who have actually been in that situation. The reports for this project say that adding these cars will "only" add about 7 minutes to the evacuation time. But when you're already stuck for three hours and the fire is moving toward you, 7 minutes is a lifetime. We don't have extra roads or "secret" ways out of the Hills; we all end up on the same few lanes. Adding more people to a neighborhood that is already a bottleneck during a fire just feels like a tragedy waiting to happen. I understand that the city needs housing, but it shouldn't be built in a place where people are already struggling to get out safely. Please don't make an existing danger even worse just for a new development. We are asking you to prioritize the lives and safety ofthe people who already live here and pay taxes here. Sincerely, Charles Porter Date: 2/15/2026 2:38:56 PM From "Amanda Rippy" "cwalkeranahein#arming@gmail.com" cwalkeranaheimplanning@gmail.com, "jtranmartin@gmail.com" jtranmartin@gmail.cort "abgorashi@gnrail.com" abgorashi@gmail.coru"Michelle Ilebenman" mlieberman92805@gmail.com, "luisbperez@outlook.com" IWsbperez@outlooLcon�"conunissioneracastro@gmail.com" To: comnissioneracastro@gmail.com,"conmissionerdeirdrekelly@gnulcom" cormWssionerdeirdrekelly@grrrail.com, "Public ConNuent" publiccomment@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Nouns C. Kurtz" NKutz*anaheimnet, "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: AL] Please Vote NO — Renaissance Canyon Acres Project (233 S. Quintana Dr.) DLV2025-00027 You don't often get email fro Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Mayor and Council Members, and Planning Commissioners, I am writing as an Anaheim Hills resident to respectfully urge you to vote NO on the proposed Renaissance Canyon Acres development located at 233 S. Quintana Drive, Anaheim, CA 92807 (DEV2025-00027). While I understand the City's need for housing, this project raises serious concerns regarding traffic congestion, wildfire evacuation safety, and neighborhood compatibility that must be addressed before any approval is considered. According to the developer's own materials, this project would introduce 140 new vehicles into an area that already functions as a traffic and evacuation choke point. Quintana Drive is a narrow corridor with no viable alternate routes, and it serves as the sole exit for four narrow private roads, including Trail Drive homes, all merging into S. Quintana Drive. There has been no credible evidence presented that existing Canyon Acres traffic conditions have ever matched this level of added volume, nor that the roadway can safely accommodate it —especially during an emergency. My neighbors lived through Canyon Fire 2 in 2017 and experienced complete gridlock while smoke was approaching, sitting in my car for over an hour without moving. This was not a minor inconvenience —it was frightening and dangerous. Project reports suggest the added traffic would increase evacuation time by "only' seven minutes; however, when residents are already trapped for hours during a wildfire, seven minutes can be the difference between safety and tragedy. Beyond public safety, this development is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Although the proposed project zoning is labeled Low Density (RS-2), the existing RS-2 homes were not built to the scale, massing, or setback intensity proposed here. In addition, the majority of the project property is currently zoned RH-2 and abuts similar estate -style RH-2 zoning. A 25-unit project does not blend with the surrounding single-family homes and does not reflect the established character or values of the community. Growth should never come at the expense of public safety. Approving additional density before addressing evacuation routes, traffic infrastructure, and emergency response capacity places existing residents at unacceptable risk. Should you find it helpful, I would welcome the opportunity for you or your staff to visit the site and surrounding streets to better understand the physical constraints and safety concerns outlined above. I respectfully ask you to prioritize safety, infrastructure, and community compatibility by voting NO on the Renaissance Canyon Acres project. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Amanda Rippy Anaheim Hills Resident Date: 2/18/2026 9:39:38 AM From "Linda David" "Public Comment" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Norma C. Kurtz" NKurfz*anaheimnet, "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please vote NO on the Shea/Festival Center apartments — It's a safety issue You don't often get ennui from Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Member, I am writing to you as a resident of Anaheim to ask you to please vote 'No" on the proposed apartments at the Anaheim Hills Festival Center. I lived here during the Canyon Fire 2 in 2017, and I will never forget the feeling of being stuck in my car, watching the smoke get closer, and literally not moving for over an hour. It wasn't just "traihc° it was a total standstill. The thought of adding hundreds ofnew apartments and about 1000+ more people to that exact saner escape route is ten*ing to those of us who have actually been in that situation. The reports for this project say that adding these cars will "only" add about 7 minutes to the evacuation firm. But when you're already stuck for three hours and the fire is rnovmg toward you, 7 minutes is a lifetime. We don't have extra roads or "secret" ways out ofthe Hills; we all end up on the sarre few lanes. Adding rnore people to a neighborhood that is already a bottleneck during a fire just feels like a tragedy waiting to happen. I understand that the city needs busing but it shouldn't be built in a place where people are already struggling to get out safely. Please don't make an existing danger even worse just for a new developrrrent. We are asking you to prioritize the lives and safety of the people who already live here and pay taxes here. Sincerely, Linda David Date: 2/18/202612:27:52 PM From "Karissa Walker" To: "Public Connnent" publicconment@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Renaissance Canyon Acres Project (233 S. Quintana Dr.) DEV2025-00027 You don't often get err ail fro Leam why this is mVortant Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Planning Comnissioners, My name is Kanssa Walker, and I live in the home that holds the easement for a portion of the road leading to Carryon Acres. I am writing to respectfully urge you to deny the proposed Renaissance Canyon Acres development located at 233 S. Quintana Drive, Anaheim CA 92807 (DEV2025-00027). This project would directly and significantly impact my family. Because my property includes part of the easement access to Canyon Acres, any increase in traffic will flow directly past my home and driveway. I have already nearly been hit twice by vehicles traveling to Canyon Acres. Both incidents occurred as I was corning down mry driveway and cars quickly turned onto the street, almost colliding with me. This is happening before the project is even built. There is already a steady aninuit of traflx; on Canyon Acres Road as it is, including trash trucks, delivery drivers, aril current workers - arxl die development has not even opened. Adding 25 new hones would drastically increase traffic on what is a very small, constrained road. It would also significantly increase congestion on Quintana Drive after the stop sign, which is an extremely narrow street. In addition, it is already extremely dangerous for residents on Quintana Drive to turn le$ onto Santa Ana Canyon Road The traffic flow makes it very difficult to safely merge, and I am honestly shocked there are not more accidents at that intersection as it is. Adding more residents to this area would only increase the riunber of vehicles attempting that sane risky left turn, compounding an already unsafe situation Whiilc the developers claim the road meets regulatory width requirements, the real -world conditions tell a different story. There is simply no way a fire trek could safely travel up one side of Quintana Drive while a passenger vehicle fits on the other. In an emergency, that lack of nuneuverability could have serious consequences. My family moved into this hone less than a year ago specifically to get away from bigh traffic, densely populated areas. While I understand that development is sometimes necessary and property owners have rights, this particular location is of appropriate for the level of density being proposed. The surrounding neighborhood consists of single-bn* homes on quiet streets that were never designed to handle this volume of traffic. Beyond the daily inconvenience, there are serious safety concerns. Particularly regarding wildfire evacuation Quintana Drive functions as a narrow corridor with united exit options. Increasing density before addressing traffic flow and emergency access puts existing residents at risk. I respectfiilly ask that you prioritize the safety of current residents, the physical limitations of the roadway, and the character ofthe neighborhood by disapproving of the Renaissance Canyon Acres project. Thank you for your time and consideration -Karissa Walker Vice President Date: From: To: Subject: 2/18/2026 2:56:28 PM "Koff & Company" hello-kottandco.cor a�sharedl.ccsendcom "Public Comment" pub6ccomment@anaheimnet [EXTERNAL] Legacy Meets Innovatiion I Kott & Company Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Paul Kott Realtors is now Kott and Company For nearly half a century, you have known us as Paul Kott Realtors. Today, we are excited to share an evolution in our journey. While our name has changed to Kott & Company, our core staff and values remain exactly where they have always been. At Koff & Co., our unwavering commitment to putting our clients first is the cornerstone of everything we do. Upholding the legacy of Paul Kott Realtors - a legacy built on integrity, honesty and personalized care - is not just a promise but our guiding principle. Having thrived for decades as a small business, we have earned the respect of our community and built deep-rooted relationships with the brokers, affiliates, lenders and clients who share our dedication to excellence. Legacy Meets Innovation We are now blending the traditional values you've always trusted with the innovative energy of the next generation. This ensures your real estate experience is seamless, successful and stress -free. To better serve you, we will be sending out periodic updates featuring our latest market insights, featured listings, and recent sales. Our goal is to provide you with the same professional edge we bring to the negotiation table, delivered straight to your inbox. For over 43 years, we have been serving our clients with their residential, commercial and investment needs. If you're ready to experience a real estate journey defined by trust and unparalleled professionalism, reach out to us today. Let's make your real estate goals a reality with Kott & Company by your side. "While our name is changing, our core values remain the same - integrity, expertise, and a deep-rooted passion for serving our community. Kott & Company represents the next generation of leadership and vision, carrying forward our tradition with renewed energy and a modern approach to real estate. The heart of who we are isn't changing - it's expanding." - Paul Kott, Founder & Broker Looking forward to hearing from you. Call us today! 714-772-7000 Our Website I Call Us I Email Us CA DRE# 00871311 Kott & Company, Inc. 1 1225 W. Lincoln Avenue I Anaheim, CA 92805 US Unsubscribe I Update Profile I Constant Contact Data Notice .'1 E Constant Contact I e m c i I & scoaI mY rke-lr,c fc Tee_ Date: 2/18/2026 3:38:35 PM From: "David Sankey" "Public Continent" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Norma C. Kurtz" NKuttz*anaheimnet, "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks(kanaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please Vote NO —Renaissance Carryon Acres Project (233 S. Quintana Dr.) DEV2025-00027 Some people who received thjs message don't often get ernaA fro Leam why this is importarrt Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Mayor and Council Members, and Plan ningCommissioners, I am writing as an Anaheim Hills resident to respectfully urge you to vote NO on the proposed Renaissance Canyon Acres development located at 233 S. Quintana Drive, Anaheim, CA 92807 (DEV2025-00027). While I understand the City's need for housing, this project raises serious concerns regarding traffic congestion, wildfire evacuation safety, and neighborhood compatibility that must be addressed before any approval is considered. According to the developer's own materials, this project would introduce 140 new vehicles into an area that already functions as a traffic and evacuation choke point. Quintana Drive is a narrow corridor with no viable alternate routes, and it serves as the sole exit for four narrow private roads, including Trail Drive homes, all merging into S. Quintana Drive. There has been no credible evidence presented that existing Canyon Acres traffic conditions have ever matched this level of added volume, nor that the roadway can safely accommodate it —especially during an emergency. I lived through Canyon Fire 2 in 2017 and experienced complete gridlock while smoke was approaching, sitting in my car for over an hour without moving. This was not a minor inconvenience —it was frightening and dangerous. Project reports suggest the added traffic would increase evacuation time by "only" seven minutes; however, when residents are already trapped for hours during a wildfire, seven minutes can be the difference between safety and tragedy. Beyond public safety, this development is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Although the proposed project zoning is labeled Low Density(RS-2), the existing RS-2 homes were not built to the scale, massing, or setback intensity proposed here. In addition, the majority of the project property is currently zoned RH-2 and abuts similar estate -style RH-2 zoning. A 25-unit project does not blend with the surrounding single-family homes and does not reflect the established character orvalues of the community. Growth should never come at the expense of public safety. Approving additional density before addressing evacuation routes, traffic infrastructure, and emergency response capacity places existing residents at unacceptable risk. Should you find it helpful, I would welcome the opportunity for you or your staff to visit the site and surrounding streets to better understand the physical constraints and safety concerns outlined above. I respectfully ask you to prioritize safety, infrastructure, and community compatibility by voting NO on the Renaissance Canyon Acres project. Thank you for your time and consideration. David Sankey Anaheim Hills resident 0 Virus-free.wmN.avast. corn Date: 2/18/2026 4:15:47 PM From "Margaret Mapes' To: "Public Comment" publiccomrneirt@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Save Anaheim IMs You don't often get email from Learn wllthis is mlportant Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. To Whom It May Concern: My son and I have been residents of Anaheim Hills since 2019 and absolutely love this comnn*. I am opposed to the building of a 447 unit development in the Festival Shopping Center for the following reasons: 1. These new units will not likely be affordable as are most of the rental units in Southern California. 2. Traffic will become rnore of an issue as it can be on Santa Ana Canyon when the 91 freeway is a parking lot. 3. Although we are out of the drought now, who is to say what our fiture years will look like as far as water availability. 4. The Yorba Linda fire was not that long ago and should be a major consideration for adding that many more people to this area in the event of an emergency. Thank you for your true and consideration of these issues. Sincerely, Margaret C. Mapes Date: 2/18/2026 5:05:52 PM From: "Robin Sol Lieberman To: "Public Comrnent" publiccommentC.anaheim.net Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please Vote NO— Renaissance Canyon Acres Project (233 S. Quintana Dr.) DEV2025-00027 You don't often get email fro Learn mk this is mMortant Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Mayor and Council Members, and Planning Commissioners, I am writing as an Anaheim Hills resident to respectfully urge you to vote NO on the proposed Renaissance Canyon Acres development located at 233 S. Quintana Drive, Anaheim CA92807 (DEV2025-00027). While I understand the City's need for housing, this project raises serious concerns regarding traffic congestion, wildfire evacuation safety, and neighborhood compatibility that must be addressed before any approval is considered. According to the developer's own materials, this project would introduce 140 new vehicles into an area that already functions as a traffic and evacuation choke point. Quintana Drive is a narrow corridor with no viable alternate routes, and it serves as the sole exit for four narrow private roads, including Trail Drive homes, all merging into S. Quintana Drive. There has been no credible evidence presented that existing Canyon Acres traffic conditions have ever matched this level of added volume, nor that the roadway can safely accommodate it —especially during an emergency. I lived through Canyon Fire 2 in 2017 and experienced complete gridlock while smoke was approaching, sitting in my car for over an hour without moving. This was not a minor inconvenience —it was frightening and dangerous. Project reports suggest the added traffic would increase evacuation time by "only" seven minutes; however, when residents are already trapped for hours during a wildfire, seven minutes can be the difference between safety and tragedy. Beyond public safety, this development is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Although the proposed project zoning is labeled Low Density (IRS-2), the existing RS-2 homes were not built to the scale, massing, or setback intensity proposed here. In addition, the majority of the project property is currently zoned RH-2 and abuts similar estate -style RH-2 zoning. A 25-unit project does not blend with the surrounding single-family homes and does not reflect the established character or values of the community. Growth should never come at the expense of public safety. Approving additional density before addressing evacuation routes, traffic infrastructure, and emergency response capacity places existing residents at unacceptable risk. Should you find it helpful, I would welcome the opportunity for you or your staff to visit the site and surrounding streets to better understand the physical constraints and safety concerns outlined above. I respectfully ask you to prioritize safety, infrastructure, and community compatibility by voting NO on the Renaissance Canyon Acres project. Thank you for your time and consideration Sincerely, Robin Lieberman Anaheim Hills Resident x�� Date: 2/19/2026 3:09:00 PM From: "Tma Low' "cwalkeranahein#amvng@gmail.com" cwalkeranaheimplanning@gmail.com, "jtranmartin@gmail com" jtranmartin@gmail.com, "abgorashi@gmail com" abgorashi@gmail com, "Michelle Ueberman" mlieberman92805@gmail.com, "luisbpereza outlook.com" luiisbperez@outlooLcon�"conunissioneracastro@gmail.com" To: comnissioneracastro@gmail.com,"conmissionerdeirdrekelly@gmail.com" cormissionerdeirdrekelly@grrrail.com, "Public Comrent" publiccomment@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Norma C. Kurtz" NKutz*anaheimnet, "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: AL] Please Vote NO — Renaissance Canyon Acres Project (233 S. Quintana Dr.) DLV2025-00027 You don't often get email from Learn i ft tivs is mVortant Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Mayor, Council Members, and Planning Commissioners, I am writing to you as an Anaheim Hills resident and a parent whose children attend I respectfully urge you to vote NO on the proposed Renaissance Canyon Acres development located at 233 S. Quintana Drive, Anaheim, CA 92807 (DEV2025- 00027). While I understand the City's need for housing, this project raises serious concerns regarding traffic congestion, wildfire evacuation safety, and neighborhood compatibility that must be addressed before any approval is considered. According to the developer's own materials, this project would introduce 140 new vehicles into an area that already functions as a traffic and evacuation choke point. Quintana Drive is a narrow corridor with no viable alternate routes, and it serves as the sole exit for four narrow private roads, including Trail Drive homes, all merging into S. Quintana Drive. There has been no credible evidence presented that existing Canyon Acres traffic conditions have ever matched this level of added volume, nor that the roadway can safely accommodate it —especially during an emergency. My family and I lived through Canyon Fire 2 in 2017 and experienced complete gridlock while smoke was approaching. This was not a minor inconvenience —it was frightening and dangerous. Project reports suggest the added traffic would increase evacuation time by "only" seven minutes; however, when residents are already trapped for hours during a wildfire, seven minutes can be the difference between safety and tragedy. Beyond public safety, this development is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Although the proposed project zoning is labeled Low Density (RS-2), the existing RS-2 homes were not built to the scale, massing, or setback intensity proposed here. In addition, the majority of the project property is currently zoned RH-2 and abuts similar estate -style RH-2 zoning. A 25-unit project does not blend with the surrounding single-family homes and does not reflect the established character or values of the community. Growth should never come at the expense of public safety. Approving additional density before addressing evacuation routes, traffic infrastructure, and emergency response capacity places existing residents at unacceptable risk. I invite you to visit the site and surrounding streets to better understand the physical constraints and safety concerns outlined above. The situation is not as the developer is presenting it in their submittal documents. I respectfully ask you to prioritize safety, infrastructure, and community compatibility by voting NO on the Renaissance Canyon Acres project. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Tina Low Anaheim Hills Resident Date: 2/19/2026 4:03:00 PM From "Lana Eastman" "Public Comment" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Nonrrra C. Kurtz" NKurU2*auaheimne4 "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please vote NO on the Shea/Festival Center apartments — It's a safety issue [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at httns://aka.ms/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City of.Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Menber, I am writing to you as a resident of Anaheimto ask you to please vote "No" on the proposed apartments at the AnahennHills Festival Center. I lived here during the Canyon Fire 2 in 2017, and I will never forget the feeling ofbeing stuck in my car, watching the snake get closer, and literally not moving for over an hour. It wasn't just "traffic"it was a total standstill. The thought of adding hundreds of new apartments and about 1000+ more people to that exact sane escape route is terrifying to those ofus who have actually been in that situation. The reports for this project say that adding these cars will "only" add about 7 minutes to the evacuation time. But when you're already stuck for three hours and the fire is nerving toward you, 7 minutes is a lifetime. We don't have extra roads or "secret" ways out of the Hills; we all end up on the same few lanes. Adding more people to a neighborhood that is already a bottleneck during a fire just feels like a tragedy waiting to happen. I understand that the city needs housing, but it shouldn't be built in a place where people are already struggling to get out safely. Please don't make an existing danger even worse just for a new development. We are asking you to prioritize the lives and safety ofthe people who already live here and pay taxes here. Sincerely, Galina and Eugene Markovich Lana Eastman Sent fromnry iPhone Date: 2/20/2026 8:11:54 AM From "jodie mosley' To: "Public Comment" publiccommeirt@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] 39 COMMONS Waring: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Every city council mtg I see there is NEVER any talk about improvement for west Anaheim Ever. This is ridiculots, the unfinished 39 Commons on Beach is a joke to the conrri mitt'. But any project near near disney or gardenwalk, or city ball gets finished. Yahoo Mail: Search, Orgmjze_ Conxluer Date: 2/20/2026 3:47:05 PM From: "Lois Jones" To: "Public Cor rnent" publiccomment@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Save Anaheim Hills You don't often get email from Learnwh miportant Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hi, my narrr is Lois Jones and I live at � in Anaheim Hills just behind Festival center. I frequently drive on Santa Ate Canyon, Weir Canyon, Serrano as well as the area surrounding the Festival center. Whether driving to church to work or to any of the anynities along Santa Ana Canyon Road the current traffic is trenrndous. I just can't imagine what over 400 units aright do to my ability to get around Anaheim Hills. On a daily basis. My &wily and I have bad to evacuate our home on three separate occasions. In one instance we were forced to go over Serrano Road into Orange to escape the fire. This was due to the amount oftraffic that was on Weir Canyon trying to escape the flames. I can't imagine what it will be Bice when another fire occurs in our area. A three hour evacuation tirne is completely unacceptable and the idea to shelter in place when you're fearing for your life is not humane. Please do not pennit the development of447 units that is proposed in the festival center to take place. I appreciate your consideration of try concerns. Sincerely, Lois Jones. Date: 2/21/2026 2:04:14 PM From "Tammy Witke" To: "Public Connnent" publiccomlmirt@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Festival center housing opposition [You don't often get email from -Learn why this is important at httus://aka.ms/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. M I would like to be heard regarding the proposed new development ofhousing in the festival center. This is a high fire zone are in where the multiple times we have been evacuated it was major Chaos. There is no Know your way. The street lights were not helpful during this tirm and there currently are only set to help Corona residents cut thm the neighborhood. We currently cannot get home owners insurance due to the negligence ofthe city in regards to planting pine trees everywhere, letting them sprout and never attending to the growth. We do not need to add any further traffic to an already dead stop traffic zone at weir and Santa Ana eyn. Daily. The streets are blocked every day during peak hours and often on the weekends. The city council members are voted in by the conymnity and there is a clear opposition to this measure. Please, Please listen to our concerns and not no on this. Thank you, Tanury Witke Date: 2/21/2026 3:08:53 PM Front To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch "Mired of your damn abusive religious assholes" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/22/2026 6:42:41 AM From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch "#Africans say you're whitewash black people in America" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/22/2026 6:49:14 AM Front To Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch "#now I4ispanic THINK Mexican born here are whitewash too" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the (sty of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognise the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/22/2026 7:31:15 AM From: To Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch " M don't care if I lose the ring" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/22/2026 8:45:52 AM Front To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch "#the Bible says you do something wrong wrong will come back to get you that's right" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/22/2026 4:47:21 PM From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] #a lot of traumatizing to Ruben me abuse not spiritual warfare Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/22/2026 8:39:00 PM From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/22/2026 10:23:02 PM From: To Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch'Tanother message from boss Auto Robert he's a sick man" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/23/202610:11:26 AM From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] BA* U.S. Department of Justice DOJ Press Releases & Ne% Update Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From U.S. Department of Justice <usdoj&public.,govde%erLcom> Date: Mon, Feb 23, 2026, 10:05 AM Subject: U.S. Department ofJusbee DOJ Press Releases & News Update To: You are subscribed to DOJ Press Releases & News for U.S. Department of Justice. This information has recently been updated, and is now available. Justice Department Finds the Special School District of St. Louis's Seclusion and Restraint Practices Discriminate Against Students with Disabilities 0212312026 07: 00 AMEST WASUNGTON — Today, the Justice Department ("the Departn erif) notified the Special School District of St. Louis, Missouri ("the District's that it found the District's seclusion and restraint practices violate Title H of the Americans with Disabilities Act. After a twenty-one rmmnth investigation, the Department concluded that the District discriminates against students with disabilities by routinely subjecting them to ineffective seclusion practices that are highly susceptible to abuse and restraints without justification, rather than providing the interventions and supports they need to receive the education they are guaranteed by federal law. © O 0 You have received this e-mail because you have asked to be notified of changes tot he U. S Department of Justice uelsite. CnvDehvery is providing this service on behalf of the Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave.. NW • Washington. DC20530 202-514-2000 and may not use your subscription information for any other proposes Manaue your Sibscrintions Department of Justice Privacy Policy I GovDelivery Privacy Policy Date: 2/21/2026 3:29:38 PM Frog "Celia Acevedo" "Public Comment" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Non= C. Kurtz" NKurU2*auaheimne4 "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please vote NO on the Shea/Festival Center apartments — It's a safety issue [You don't often get email from Learn why this is inportant at https://aka.rrs/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City ofAnaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. No Dear Council Member, I am writing to you as a resident of Anaheimto ask you to please vote "No" on the proposed apartments at the AnaheirnHills Festival Center. I lived here during the Canyon Fire 2 in 2017, and I will never forget the feeling ofbeing stuck in my car, watching the smoke get closer, and literally not rnoving for over an hour. It wasn't just "traffic"it was a total standstill. The thought of adding hundreds of new apartments and about 1000+ more people to that exact sarre escape route is terrifying to those ofus who have actually been in that situation. The reports for this project say that adding these cars will "only" add about 7 minutes to the evacuation time. But when you're already stuck for three hours and the fire is moving toward you, 7 minutes is a lifetime. We don't have extra roads or "secret" ways out of the Hills; we all end up on the same few lanes. Adding more people to a neighborhood that is already a bottleneck during a fire just feels like a tragedy waiting to happen. I understand that the city needs housing, but it shouldn't be built in a place where people are already struggling to get out safely. Please don't make an existing danger even worse just for a new development. We are asking you to prioritize the lives and safety ofthe people who already live here and pay taxes here. Sincerely, Fnviado desde rm iPhone Date: 2/21/2026 6:28:09 PM From: "Jerry Minsky" "Public Comment" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Nonrua C. Kurtz" NKurU2*auaheimne4 "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please vote NO on the Shea/Festival Center apartments — It's a safety issue Some people who received this message don't often get email fro Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Member, I am writing to you as a resident of Anaheim to ask you to please vote 'No" on the proposed apartments at the Anaheim Hills Festival Center. I lived here during the Canyon Fire 2 in 2017, and I will never forget the feeling of being stuck in my car, watching the smoke get closer, and literally not moving for over an hour. It wasn't just "traihc° it was a total standstill. The thought of adding hundreds ofnew apartrnents and about 1000+ more people to that exact satre escape route is ten*ing to those of us who have actually been in that situation. The reports for this project say that adding these cars will "only" add about 7 minutes to the evacuation firm. But when you're already stuck for three hours and the fire is rnovmg toward you, 7 minutes is a lifetime. We don't have extra roads or "secret" ways out ofthe Hills; we all end up on the sarre few lanes. Adding rnore people to a neighborhood that is already a bottleneck during a fire just feels like a tragedy waiting to happen. I understand that the city needs busing but it shouldn't be built in a place where people are already struggling to get out safely. Please don't make an existing danger even worse just for a new developrrrent. We are asking you to prioritize the lives and safety of the people who already live here and pay taxes here. Sincerely, Thank you, Jerry Minsky Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6, an AT&T 5G smartphone Get Outlook for Android Date: 2/21/2026 8:33:11 PM From "PAULA RICHARDSON" "Public Comment" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Nonrrra C. Kurtz" NKurU2*auaheimne4 "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please vote NO on the Shea/Festival Center apartments — It's a safety issue [You don't often get email from- Learn why this is important at httns://aka.nis/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City ofAnaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Mender, i am writing to you as a resident of Anaheimto ask you to please vote "No" on the proposed apartments at the AnaheirnHills Festival Center. I lived here during the Canyon Fire 2 in 2017, and I will never forget the feeling ofbeing stuck in my car, watching the stroke get closer, and literally not roving for over an hour. It wasn't just "traffic"it was a total standstill. The thought of adding hundreds of new apartments and about 1000+ more people to that exact same escape route is terrifying to those ofus who have actually been in that situation. The reports for this project say that adding these cars will "only" add about 7 minutes to the evacuation time. But when you're already stuck for three hours and the fire is moving toward you, 7 minutes is a lifetime. We don't have extra roads or "secret" ways out of the Hills; we all end up on the same few lanes. Adding more people to a neighborhood that is already a bottleneck during a fire just feels like a tragedy waiting to happen. I understand that the city needs housing, but it shouldn't be built in a place where people are already struggling to get out safely. Please don't make an existing danger even worse just for a new development. We are asking you to prioritize the lives and safety ofthe people who already live here and pay taxes here. Sincerely, Paula Richardson iananemm runs, uH yusua The Sunanit Sent frommy iPhone Date: 2/21/2026 8:05:17 PM From "Pearl Arcola" To: "Public Comment" publicconunent@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arcola! [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https:Haka.ms/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This ernail originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members ofthe Anaheim City Council, I amwriting to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the inanediate release ofthe autopsy report, the names ofthe officers involved, and the immediate firing ofthe officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two AnaheimPD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front ofhis family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained themat the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten rrunutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated fromKatella High School. He was a hard-working resident ofAnaheim who tookpride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers fromthe incident. I demand the release ofthe autopsy report. I demand the names ofthe officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Sent frommy iPhone Date: 2/21/202611:18:57 PM From "Rick Pollgreen" To: "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheininet, "Public Comment" publicconment@anaheimnet Cc: "Ashleigh Aitken" ashleigh@ashleighaitken.con6 "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] The festival project! Warning: This email originated from outside the City ofAnaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hi council woman. Thanks for your service. -- I amwriting you as a last resort based upon all I amhearing and seeing on social media regarding this upcoming vote on march 3. What I amhearing is that the council has already made up their minds on which way they are voting. Ifthat was the case, why did they postpone that vote? They should have just voted the last titre it was on agenda. Right? To add more people and cars into this EXTREME FIRE HAZARD AREA is just so wrong! And not what a reasonable person would do. So, it seems that money surely has to be involved although claiming that gets me in trouble apparently. What other reason is there for people to willfully endanger those of us who already live here with this insane project? There are plenty of other locations in Anaheim that are perfectly suited for this type of project! And Anaheim Hills is totally different in its feel and character! Putting in high rise apartments like THE VIBE are totally out of character. That is a fact! Look at the original planned corntrunity plans for AH. Why not stick to that look and feel? And that has nothing to do with the fire evacuation issue that clearly exists. I just hope that each ofyou on the council can live with yourselves if/when we have another wildfire evacuation event and people are trapped in trying to evacuate! Shame on you! I URGE YOU TO VOTE NO ON THIS PROJECT! Sincerely, A VERYCONCERNED RESIDENT RickPollgreen Thanks, Rick Date: 2/22/202612:09:22 PM From "Maria Cara" To: "Public Comment" publiccomment@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at httns://aka.rrs/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This ernail originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members ofthe Anaheim City Council, I amwriting to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the inanediate release ofthe autopsy report, the names ofthe officers involved, and the immediate firing ofthe officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two AnaheimPD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front ofhis family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained themat the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten rrrinutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated fromKatella High School. He was a hard-working resident ofAnaheim who tookpride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers fromthe incident. I demand the release ofthe autopsy report. I demand the names ofthe officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Sent frommy iPhone Date: 2/22/202612:41:46 PM From "Danrads Guman" To: "Public Comment" pubticconnnent@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at his://aka.rrrs/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This ernail originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members ofthe Anaheim City Council, I amwriting to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the inanediate release ofthe autopsy report, the names ofthe officers involved, and the immediate firing ofthe officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two AnaheimPD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front ofhis family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained themat the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten rrrinutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated fromKatella High School. He was a hard-working resident ofAnaheim who tookpride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers fromthe incident. I demand the release ofthe autopsy report. I demand the names ofthe officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Sent frommy iPhone Date: 2/22/2026 8:59:10 PM From "maria zamudio" To: "Public Corrrnent" publiccongnent@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! You don't often get email from Learnwkthis is �nportant Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members ofthe Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demarxl justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the lid unedited body camera footage from all officers, the immediate release of the autopsy report, the name of the officers involved, and the immediate firing of the officer who shot Albert to death Albert was ambushed by two Anaheim PD officers who leapt out of an unmAed vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front of his famly. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained them at the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten minutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated from Katella High School. He was a hard-working resident of Anaheim who took pride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright fixture ahead of him Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers from the incident. I demand the release of the autopsy report. I demand the nacres of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Maria Zamudio Date: 2/23/2026 8:24:25 AM From To: "Public Comment" publiccomment@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] ATTENTION: 447 Proposed Development You don't often get email from 11MILarn wh this is ' ortant Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim Council Members My wife and I are 100% opposed to this catastrophe in the works. Every neighbor I've spoken with is in agreement. Every councilmernber along with the mayor should take the time and survey what the traffic is like in this area between the hours of 3-6. Thank you Respectfully, Dennis and Debbie Currie Anaheim, CA 92808 Date: 2/23/202610:00:54 AM Frog "Anna Rocha" "Public Comment" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Non= C. Kurtz" NKurU2*auaheimne4 "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please vote NO on the Shea/Festival Center apartments — It's a safety issue [You don't often get email fro Learn why this is important at httus://aka.rrs/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City ofAnaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Member, I am writing to you as a resident of Anaheimto ask you to please vote "No" on the proposed apartments at the AnahennHills Festival Center. I lived here during the Canyon Fire 2 in 2017, and I will never forget the feeling ofbeing stuck in my car, watching the snake get closer, and literally not roving for over an hour. It wasn't just "traffic" it was a total standstill. The thought of adding hundreds of new apartments and about 1000+ more people to that exact sane escape route is terrifying to those ofus who have actually been in that situation. The reports for this project say that adding these cars will "only" add about 7 minutes to the evacuation time. But when you're already stuck for three hours and the fire is roving toward you, 7 minutes is a lifetime. We don't have extra roads or "secret" ways out of the Hills; we all end up on the same few lanes. Adding more people to a neighborhood that is already a bottleneck during a fire just feels like a tragedy waiting to happen. I understand that the city needs housing, but it shouldn't be built in a place where people are already struggling to get out safely. Please don't make an existing danger even worse just for a new development. We are asking you to prioritize the lives and safety ofthe people who already live here and pay taxes here. Sincerely, Anna Rocha 30 year resident Sent fromnry iPhone Date: 2/23/202612:29:15 PM From "Grace Arcola" To: "Public Comment" publicconumnt@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at httns://aka.ns/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This ernail originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members ofthe Anaheim City Council, I amwriting to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the inanediate release ofthe autopsy report, the names ofthe officers involved, and the immediate firing ofthe officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two AnaheimPD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front ofhis family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained themat the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten rrunutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated fromKatella High School. He was a hard-working resident ofAnaheim who tookpride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers fromthe incident. I demand the release ofthe autopsy report. I demand the names ofthe officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired imunediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Respectfully, Grace Arzola Date: 2/23/202612:39:28 PM From: "PragneshRay" "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Public Comment" publiccomrent@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Norma C. Kurtz" NKuttz*anaheimnet, "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please vote NO on the Shea/Festival Center apartments - It's a safety issue You don't often get email from Learn why this is migortart Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Member, I amwriting to you as a resident of Anaheimto ask you to please vote "No" on the proposed apartments at the Anaheim Hills Festival Center. I lived here during the Canyon Fire 2 in 2017, and I will never forget the feeling ofbeing stuck in my car FOR 3 hrs, watching the smoke get closer, and literally not moving for over an hour. It wasn't just "traffic"- it was a total standstill. The thought of adding hundreds ofnew apartments and about 1000+ more people to that exact same escape route is terrifying to those ofus who have actually been in that situation. The reports for this project say that adding these cars will "only" add about 7 minutes to the evacuation time. But when you're already stuck forthree hours and the fire is moving toward you, 7 minutes is a lifetime. We don't have extra roads or"secret" ways out ofthe Hills; we all end up on the same few lanes. Adding more people to a neighborhood that is already a bottleneck during a fire just feels like a tragedy waiting to happen. I understand that the city needs housing, but it shouldn't be built in a place where people are already struggling to get out safely. Please don't make an existing danger even worse just for a new development. We are asking you to prioritize the lives and safety of the people who already live here and pay taxes here. Sincerely, Pra nesh Ra Anaheim,CA 92808 Yahoo Mail Search, Orgu» m, Conquer Date: 2/23/20261:19:21 PM Front To Subject: [EXTERNAL] Fmd: Children crime book Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click finks or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. ---------- Forwarded message ------- From Craig Durfey- Date: Mon, Feb 23, 2026 at 4:13 AM btnsl/www.facebook. corn'reeV929534576485535/?fs=e&rnbex6d=wwMfr&fs=e Sent from my Phone Date: 2/23/2026 3:43:14 PM From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Feds say man groomed 13-year-old to engage in self -harm online and lured her to LA. motel for sex Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Feds say man groomed 13-year-old to engage in self -harm online and lured her to L.A. motel for sex httpsl/www.latims.conr cahfoniWstory/2026-02-23/feds-say-nmri-who-groomed-13-year-old-&I into-acts-of-self-hanrronhne-hued-her-to- la-motel-for-sex Federal authorities believe the suspect to be associated with nihilistic violent extrernist ideology, which prosecutor Bill Fssayli caged "a growing threat to American faniies" and 'one of the rnost twisted and disturbing ideas to crawl out of the tntemet." Date: 2/23/2026 2:17:31 PM From "Manisha Sheth" "Public Conrnent" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubaleava@anaheimnet, "Non= C. Kurtz" NKurU2*auaheimne4 "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Concerns about the Festival Center Project and Wildfire Safety [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at httns://aka.ns/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City ofAnaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Member, I moved to Anaheim Hills because it is a beautiful, family -oriented corrinimity, but I am very concerned about the proposed Shea/Festival Center apartment project. Since moving here, I've learned that our neighborhood is in a high -risk fire zone with very limited ways to get out. I was shocked to read that it already takes over three hours to evacuate this area during an emergency. Adding over 1,000 more people and their cars to our streets seems like a huge risk to everyone's safety. The project's environmental report admits that these new apartrnents will make evacuation times even longer. As a parent, I think about what would happen if a fire broke out while I was trying to get my kids to safety. If the roads are already failing, adding hundreds more cars into the mixwi l make a bad situation impossible. It feels like the city is hoping for the best rather than planning for the worst. I amnot against new housing in general, but it has to be built in the right places. Putting high -density housing at a known bottleneck in a fire zone is not responsible I am asking you to please put our safety first and vote "No" on this project until we have a real solution for getting people out of the Hills safely. Sincerely, Manisha Date: 2/23/2026 5:57:43 PM From "Ariel Espinosa" To: "Public Comment" publiccomment@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arcola! [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.cos/LeamAboutSendcrldentification ] Warning: This ernail originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members ofthe Anaheim City Council, I amwriting to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the immediate release ofthe autopsy report, the names ofthe officers involved, and the immediate firing ofthe officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two AnaheimPD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front ofhis family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained themat the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten rrrinutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated fromKatella High School. He was a hard-working resident ofAnaheim who tookpride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers fromthe incident. I demand the release ofthe autopsy report. I demand the names ofthe officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Sent frommy iPhone Best regards Ariel Espinosa Date: 2/23/2026 6:08:43 PM From "MatthewCompton" To: "Public Comment" publiccominent@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNALI No more silence! Justice for Albert Arcola! You don't often get email from am wh this is ' ortant Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members ofthe Anaheim City Council, I am writing to derrand justice for the police killing of Albert Arcola. I demaixi the fid unedited body camera footage from all officers, the inrrrdiate release of the autopsy report, the names of the officers involved, and the immediate firing ofthe officer who shot Albert to death Albert was ambushed by two AnaheimPD officers who leapt out of an unmAed vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front of his family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained them at the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten mmiutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated from Katella High School. He was a hard-working resident of Anaheim who took pride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, f wily member and friend with a bright fixture ahead of him Albert should be alive today! I dematid the full body camera footage of all officers from the incident. I demand the release of the autopsy report. I demand the nacres of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired i rnediately. Justice for Albert Arcola! Date: 2/23/2026 6:15:29 PM From "Erika A►menta' To: "Public Comment" publicconvnent@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arcola! You don't often get enrail7 from Learn wh_y this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arcola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the innnediate release of the autopsy report, the names of the officers involved, and the irrardiate firing of the officer who shot Albert to death Albert was ambushed by two Anaheim PD officers who leapt out of an ru nwked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front of his family. They threatened to shoot his farnily and then detained them at the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten minutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated from Katella High School He was a hard-working resident of Anaheim who took pride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, fannly member and friend with a bright fimure ahead of him Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers from the mcideM I demand the release of the autopsy report. I demand the names of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Date: 2/23/2026 6:57:11 PM From "Cynthia Cortez" _ To: "Public Comment" publiccomment@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at httns://aka.rrs/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Waming: This ernail originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members ofthe Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the inanediate release ofthe autopsy report, the names ofthe officers involved, and the immediate firing ofthe officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two AnaheimPD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front ofhis family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained themat the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten rrrinutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated fromKatella High School. He was a hard-working resident ofAnaheim who tookpride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers fromthe incident. I demand the release ofthe autopsy report. I demand the names ofthe officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Sent frommy iPhone Date: 2/23/2026 7:38:00 PM From "Erlvnne Ballo' To: "Public Comment" publicconunent@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTEILNALI No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at httns://aka.ma/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Waming: This ernail originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members ofthe Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the inanediate release ofthe autopsy report, the names ofthe officers involved, and the immediate firing ofthe officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two AnaheimPD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front ofhis family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained themat the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten rrrinutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated fromKatella High School. He was a hard-working resident ofAnaheim who tookpride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers fromthe incident. I demand the release ofthe autopsy report. I demand the names ofthe officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Sent frommy iPhone Date: 2/23/2026 7:52:58 PM From "abe" To: "Public Continent" publiccommentCanaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arcola! You don't often get email from Learn whythis is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to derrnnd justice for the police killing of Albert Arcola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the iannediate release of the autopsy report, the names of the officers involved, and the iru nediate firing of the officer who shot Albert to death Albert was ambushed by two Anaheim PD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, krilbg him in front of his family. They threatened to shoot his farnily and then detained them at the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten minutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated from Katella High School He was a hard-working resident of Anaheim who took pride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, fannly member and friend with a bright fit ure ahead of him Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers from the mcideM I derrmid the release of the autopsy report. I demand the names of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Date: 2/23/202610:06:01 PM From "Sonya Lopez" To: "Public Comment" publicconvnent@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at httns://aka.ms/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Waming: This ernail originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members ofthe Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the inanediate release ofthe autopsy report, the names ofthe officers involved, and the immediate firing ofthe officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two AnaheimPD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front ofhis family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained themat the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten rrrinutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated fromKatella High School. He was a hard-working resident ofAnaheim who tookpride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers fromthe incident. I demand the release ofthe autopsy report. I demand the names ofthe officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired imunediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Sonya Lopez Sent frommy iPhone Date: 2/24/2026 5:02:02 AM From "Maria Cruz" To: "Public Comment" publicconunent@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTEILNALI No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! [You don't often get email fro Leam why this is important at httns://aka.rrs/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members ofthe Anaheim City Council, i amwriting to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the inanediate release ofthe autopsy report, the names ofthe officers involved, and the irnmediate firing ofthe officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two AnaheimPD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front ofhis family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained themat the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten rrrinutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated fromKatella High School. He was a hard-working resident ofAnaheim who tookpride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers fromthe incident. I demand the release ofthe autopsy report. I demand the names ofthe officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Sent frommy iPhone Date: 2/24/2026 8:43:15 AM From "Teresa Cortez" To: "Public Comment" publicconumnt@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! [You don't often get email from Leam why this is important at httns://aka.rm/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This ernail originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members ofthe Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the inanediate release ofthe autopsy report, the names ofthe officers involved, and the immediate firing ofthe officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two AnaheimPD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front ofhis family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained themat the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten rrunutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated fromKatella High School. He was a hard-working resident ofAnaheim who tookpride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers fromthe incident. I demand the release ofthe autopsy report. I demand the names ofthe officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzota! Date: 2/24/2026 8:44:04 AM From "Isabella Leon" To: "Public Comment" publicconvnent@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https:Haka.ms/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This ernail originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members ofthe Anaheim City Council, I amwriting to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the inanediate release ofthe autopsy report, the names ofthe officers involved, and the immediate firing ofthe officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two AnaheimPD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front ofhis family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained themat the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten rrunutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated fromKatella High School. He was a hard-working resident ofAnaheim who tookpride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers fromthe incident. I demand the release ofthe autopsy report. I demand the names ofthe officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Sent frommy iPhone Date: 2/24/2026 9:08:01 AM From: To Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch'Tis America the best place to live what is Courthouse dope stuff' on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/24/2026 9:19:28 AM From: "Ruben Soto' To Subject: Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/24/2026 9:59:35 AM From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch "#you judge Trwnp you try to destroy me you are guilty Democrats" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/24/202610:11:50 AM From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch "#who is the churches donating their money too favoritism corruption" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/24/202610:04:19 AM From "A.I.M." To: "Public Comment" pubilicconunent@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arcola! You don't often get enrail7 fro Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arcola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the innnediate release of the autopsy report, the names of the officers involved, and the iru nediate firing of the officer who shot Albert to death Albert was ambushed by two Anaheim PD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front of his family. They threatened to shoot his farnily and then detained them at the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten minutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated from Katella High School He was a hard-working resident of Anaheim who took pride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright fimure ahead of him Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers from the incident. I demand the release of the autopsy report. I demand the names of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired imrediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Alesha Marshall Date: 2/24/202610:04:43 AM From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Ford: Child brain study expose lose What matter Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Forwarded message - From Craig Durfey Date: Tue, Feb 24, 2026 at 10,02 AM bapsl/www.facebook.cotr�reeV1279374120756142/?fs—c&nibextid—ww)Cfr&fs=e Sent from my Phone Date: 2/24/202611:36:33 AM From "Majestik Theatre" To: "Public Continent" publiccommeirt@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Art You don't often get email fro Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I'd really like to conrrern on the discontinuation of the art bus and art on demand. I think that it's a really big disservice to the city And the tourism in the city. The employees love their jobs and they do an anwing job. They should definitely continue to do it. People rely on this service and it should really be continued. Date: 2/24/202611:40:32 AM From "Majestik Theatre" To: "Public Comment" publiccommeirt@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Tax ID use for utility service You don't often get email from Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I'd really like to bring up the fact that a company can use a tax ID to start utility services and not be charged a deposit upfront although that tax ID has never been used within the city before however a citizen cannot use a tax ID that is provided to themby the government and they are using it to earn credit It can be run on a credit report to obtain credit history, but they cannot use it to open an account. They have to be treated as though they have no credit history and open an account with a deposit upfront regardless of their credit it feels hke citizens are treated hke they're not the same because they are in tr igrants who have a tax ID rather than a Social Security, although they are also paying taxes. Date: 2/24/202611:58:41 AM From: "Joni Gaynor" "Public Continent" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Norma C. Kurtz" NKuttz*anaheimnet, "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] NO ON FESTIVAL HOUSING You don't often get eniul fro Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Member, I am writing as a resident of Anaheim to respectfully ask that you vote "No" on the proposed apartments at the Anaheim Hills Festival Center. I lived here duringthe Canyon Fire 2 in 2017, and I will never forget sitting in my carfor2.5 HOURS to go 1/4 mile, unable to move, breathing in smoke. It was NOTtypical congestion. It was a complete standstill on the very routes we are expected to rely on in an emergency. Adding hundreds of apartments and roughly one thousand additional residents to that same evacuation corridor raises serious safety concerns. The project reports suggest the added traffic would increase evacuation time by about seven minutes. THIS IS ABSURD! In a wildfire situation, minutes matter, but more than likely this will lead to 45 minutes to an hour more time to evacuate. When roads are already gridlocked and conditions are changing rapidly, even a short delay can place lives at risk. Anaheim Hills does not have multiple evacuation alternatives. Most residents funnel onto the same limited roadways. Put the infrastructure in before the housing! Otherwise it is like building the titanic and not providing enough life jackets. The end result will be the same. Lives lost! There are also concerns regarding senior safety. The nearby Overlook senior community does not have a dedicated evacuation plan in place. At Natalie Meek's open house I asked travel engineers, fire and police staff and not one person could answer how these seniors would be evacuated. Many residents have mobility challenges and would require assistance during an emergency. Increasing traffic density in the immediate area further complicates their ability to evacuate safely and quickly. In addition, the proposed development appears to fall short of the number of required parking spaces under city code. Reduced on site parking will inevitably push more vehicles onto surrounding streets, narrowing already constrained roadways. This does not consider either the handicap spaces orTesla charging stations that will eventually be installed. I understand the need for housing. However, public safety must remain the priority, especially in a high fire risk area with documented evacuation challenges. Our Lives Matter!! In addition, District 6 has met the required quota already. I respectfully urge you to consider the real life evacuation history of this community, the vulnerability of nearby seniors, and the parking deficiencies tied to this project when casting your vote. Thank you for your time and consideration Joni Gaynor Joni Gaynor Date: 2/24/202612:08:15 PM From "Daily Information" To: "Public Comment" publicconmmnt@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Tax paying citizens equality You don't often get email from Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. To Whom It May Concern, I would like to address a discrepancy in how utility service accounts are established. Currently, companies can use a tax ID to start services without an upfront deposit, even if that ID has no prior history with the city. In contrast, individual citizens using govemn ent-issued tax IDs to build credit are unable to use those IDs to open accounts. Despite having a verifiable credit history that can be run on a report, these individuals are treated as if they have no credit and are required to pay a deposit upfront. It appears that citizens who are immigrants paying taxes are being treated differently because they use a tax ID rather than a Social Security number. I befieve all taxpayers should be held to the same standards and provided the sane opportunities to establish services without unnecessary financial barriers. Date: 2/24/20261:17:34 PM From "Aline Young" To: "Public Comment" publiccominent@anaheintnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Festival Development Anaheim Hills You don't often get email from Weam wh�miportant Warning: This entail originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. To whom it may concern, I have lived in this area for the majority of my life and was proud to be part of the first graduating class from Carryon High School I currently own homes in the Hills and in Villa Park, and I care deeply about the safety and firture of our commnity. I have written to you before regarding my concerns about the proposed development. Unfortunately, it appears that financial considerations are being prioritized over public safety. I fimdamer tally disagree with this approach from our elected representative. Your number one responsibility should be to keep your constituents safe. The current fire evacuation plan is flawed on multiple levels. It does not adequately account for existing traffic volunne, let alone the additional congestion this developniant would create. In the event of another fire of any meaningful size, I fear that Wes could be lost. That is not an acceptable risk. I see no justification for roving forward with this building project until meaningful infrastructure improvements — including additional road access — are completed. Furthermore, the current evacuation signage is inadequate and mist be significantly 4roved. As a member of your constituency, I strongly urge you to vote no on this proposal until safety is fully addressed and assured. On March 3, many of us will be watching closely to see who prioritizes the well-being of our comnmity. Respectfully, Aline Young Date: 2/24/2026 2:53:22 PM From "David Pulido" To: "Public Comment" publicconunent@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] JUSTICE FOR ALBERT ARZOLA You don't often get email from Learn whxfl is is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Counci , My name is David Pulido. I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the fill, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the inivediate release of the autopsy report, the names of the officers involved, and the immediate firing of the officer who shot Albert to death Albert was ambushed by two Anaheim PD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front of bis family. They threatened to shoot his f rrily and then detained them at the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten minutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated from Katella High School. He was a hard-working resident of Araheimwho took pride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, farmly umber and friend with a bright future ahead of him Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers from the incident. I demand the release of the autopsy report. i demand the names of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Date: 2/24/2026 2:54:37 PM From: "Jocelyn" To: "Public Comment" publicconxnent@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arcola! You don't often get enrrail from Learn whthis is nnportant Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the it nnediate release of the autopsy report, the names of the officers involved, and the iru nediate firing of the officer who shot Albert to death Albert was ambushed by two Anaheim PD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front of his family. They threatened to shoot his finny and then detained them at the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten minutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated from Katella High School He was a hard-working resident of Anaheim who took pride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, fat* member and friend with a bright fimure ahead of him Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers from the incident. I demand the release of the autopsy report. I demand the names of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired imrediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Date: 2/24/2026 2:57:40 PM From "Christine Ediss" To: "Public Comment" publiccomment@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https:Haka.ms/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This ernail originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members ofthe Anaheim City Council, I amwriting to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the inanediate release ofthe autopsy report, the names ofthe officers involved, and the immediate firing ofthe officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two AnaheimPD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front ofhis family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained themat the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten rrunutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated fromKatella High School. He was a hard-working resident ofAnaheim who tookpride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers fromthe incident. I demand the release ofthe autopsy report. I demand the names ofthe officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired imunediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Christine Lopez Ediss, M.A. Sent frommy iPhone Date: 2/24/2026 3:45:33 PM From "Johanna Tomes' To: "Public Continent" publicconntent(aanaheinonet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Concerns about the Festival Center Project and Wddfine Safety You dodl otien gel email Gum- Loam why thu u nporourl Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Council Member, these is Johanna Torres, I moved to Anaheim Hills because it is a beautiful, family -oriented coaununity, but I am very concerned about the proposed Shea/Festival Center apartment project. Since moving hen The project's environmental report admits that these new apartments will make evacuation times even longer. Ae a parent, I think about what would happen if a fire broke out while I am not against new housing in general, but it has to be built in the right places. Putting high -density housing at a known bottleneck in a fire zone rs not responsible. I am as Sinecrc ly, Johanna Torres Date: 2/24/2026 3:58:19 PM From "Zurdo W To: "Public Comment" publiccomment@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at his://aka.rns/LeamAboutSenderldentification ] Warning: This ernail originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members ofthe Anaheim City Council, I amwriting to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the inanediate release ofthe autopsy report, the names ofthe officers involved, and the immediate firing ofthe officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two AnaheimPD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front ofhis family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained themat the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten rrunutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated fromKatella High School. He was a hard-working resident ofAnaheim who tookpride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers fromthe incident. I demand the release ofthe autopsy report. I demand the names ofthe officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Sent frommy iPhone Date: 2/24/2026 4:12:41 PM From "Cliff Peebles" "Public Comrnent" publicconnnent@anaheimnet, "Ashleigh Aitken" AAitken@anaheimnet, "Carlos A. Leon" To: CLeon@anaheimnet, "Ryan Balius" RBalius@anaheimnet, "Natalie Rubalcava" NRubalcava@anaheimnet, "Norma C. Kurtz" NKurtz*anaheimnet, "KristenMaahs" KMaahs@anaheimnet, "Natalie Meeks" NMeeks@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Vote NO on the Festival Center Apartment Project You don't often get enil fro Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I acknowledge that there is a lack of housing in Southern California, and across mach of our nation, and this issue needs attention However, my NO vote reconmrndation is not due to NIBY. My request is because I have witnessed the traffic gridlock in leaving my horns during an emergency. I vividly recall the last tirne we were evacuated by fire, and seeing fires burning on both sides of Weir Canyon road as we drove north down the bfil to the 91 freeway. Yes, w need more housing, but fast we need the road infrastructure in place to support the housing. Please vote NO on the Festival Center Apartment Project. Respectfi*, Cliff Peebles Date: 2/24/2026 4:31:15 PM From: To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Digital addiction in children: `I treat children who spend the weekend in their room with their cellphones' Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I thought you would be interested in this story I found on MSN: Digital addiction in children: `I treat children who spend the weekend in their room with their cellphones' - httpsJ/www.nrncoriierrus/heakWother/digital addiction in chMreri-i-treat-children who-spend-the-weekend-irrtheir- roornwdi-their-cckhones/ar-AAl WZkW?ocid=socialshare Date: 2/24/2026 6:36:47 PM From: "Ruben Soto" = To: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Watch "Anaheim City council meetingshaming religious people" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Date: 2/24/2026 8:07:18 PM From: "Dean Gaynor' To: "Public Comment" pub6ccomment@anaheimnet Subject: [EXTERNAL] Fw. Festival Re -Zoning to a1lowMulti Fanny Housing Project You don't often get ema>7 fro Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. — Forwarded Messa e From: Dean Gaynor To: publiccomments@anaheim.net <publiccomments@anaheim.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2026 at 06.35.31 PM PST Subject: Festival Re -Zoning to allow Multi Family Housing Project This is not about rich people in District 6 not wanting Multi Family in our area. I have lived in in District 6 for 32-years and: 1) We aren't rich, we live paycheck to paycheck like the rest of our neighbors, 2) We are fine with putting more multi family in district 6 if we need it. Just put it on the other side of Santa Ana Canyon and of the 91 freeway where people have multiple streets to use to evacuate in an emergency. THIS IS STRICTLY ABOUT LIFE AND SAFETY! The Hills will catch fire again, it's just a question of when. We are just asking our City Council to not be irresponsible with our lives and the lives of these potential new families by packing more families and cars into this one area that is land locked on 3 sides by hills that catch fire and locked off on the remaining side by Santa Ana Canyon which isn't equipped to handle the amount of normal traffic it gets and certainly can't handle safe evacuations. Please be responsible before putting any more families at risk and putting the existing families in this little land locked area at greater risk by first fixing the infrastructure. If you want to rezone to allow dense multi family on this side of Santa Ana Canyon, widen Santa Ana Canyon. Or, give us actual, functional, over passes. They are spending millions in Los Angeles to give the wild life an overpass for their safety. I love our Mountain Lion populatin and am glad they are doing this, but don't your constituents deserve at least as much before you vote to make their situation go from extremely unsafe to unimaginably unsafe? Also why not first extend Weir Canyon towards Orange and Irive. We have been told for years years it was going to continue, but it still deadends not allowing us an alternate route to possible safety. Do more than just the "know Your Way Plan" to cut down on our current 3+ hour evacuation times before putting another 1,000 estimated cars in this small pocket! We appreciate the work on the "Know Your Way" plan and we will be it's greatest supporters, but let's be realistic- it's not enough to throw that many more families and cars into this already unsafe current situation. And commercial/retail usage AS IT IS APPROPRIATELY CURRENTLY ZONED FOR is not the same as 1,000+ more cars crammed into a parking structure for residential housing when trying to get human lives out safely. Dense residential housing in this small pocket will make it worse than it would be for any commercial retail use that may go into the theater space. People aren't shopping or going to appointments in festival center during wildfires. Those of us who live here know, THAT IS NOT WHAT HAPPENS IN OUR COMMUNITY! WHEN THE WINDS PICK UP AND ESPECIALLY WHEN AFIRE STARTS THERE WON'T be 1,000 CARS PARKED THERE TO USE WHATEVER PERMITTED USE MAY GO IN WHERE THE THEATER IS. WE DO KNOW THOUGH THAT UNDER THOSE CONDITIONS THE OCCUPANTS OF THOSE ESTIMATED 1,000 Additional cars will be there packed in their new proposed parking structure with their new families scouring media to find out if they need to evacuate and then discovering what we all know who already live here, that they can't get out in any safe, reasonable amount of time. Not asking our representatives to take any drastic measures - Just asking them to vote NOT to change the zoning. Leave it as it is and vote no on this proposal. How will you live with yourselves if people burn in their cars trying to flee like they did on Maui and you personally voted to make evacuations more impacted? My wife and I and our neighbors have spoke before, but it is worth repeating here. We live on Altair Lane in the housing track above Target. One of the times were were evacuated, I believe it was during the 2017 fire, just trying to go from our house, out our track, taking Bauer Road to Roosevelt (next to Festival) trying to get to Santa Ana Canyon (a route that Google says takes 3 minutes in traffic), was one we couldn't even complete because Santa Ana Canyon was so impacted due to the evacuation. It took us 2.5 hours just to get to the driveway going into Festival. We jumped the center median, along with other neighbors as spot fires were popping up along the street and pulled into festival after 2.5 hours hoping that if the winds picked up and the fire headed our way we wouldn't burn to death or die from smoke inhilation if we parked in the middle of the asphalt of the shopping center. We are glad to have the Know Your Way Plan to cut down any amount of time off our evacuation, but it is simply not enough given how long it took then to make anyone feel that another 1,000+ residential cars can safely be added to the mix when when human life is on the line and certainly not enough for you to feel comfortable approving this project. I would be happy to talk further with any of you who want to know what the evacutation situation really is rather than going off of an obviously flawed traffic model that I can assure you does not reflect the reality that we all live in this small pocket. Sincerely, Dean Gaynor