The URL can be used to link to this page

04/21/2026ANAHEIM CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 21, 2026 The regular meeting of April 21, 2026 was called to order at 3:00 P.M. in the Council Chamber of Anaheim City Hall, located at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard. The meeting notice, agenda, and related material were duly posted on April 16, 2026. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ashleigh E. Aitken and Council Members Carlos A. Leon, Ryan Balius, Norma Campos Kurtz, and Kristen M. Maahs. Council Member Natalie Meeks joined the meeting during Closed Session MEMBERS ABSENT: Council Member Natalie Rubalcava STAFF PRESENT: Interim City Manager Greg Garcia, City Attorney Robert Fabela, and City Clerk Theresa Bass ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSION: None PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS: Sandy Lozeau thanked the City Council for prioritizing City staff and addressing longstanding issues such as low wages, salary compaction, and employee retention. She stated that the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) union is negotiating the fourth and final year of the contract and expressed concern that the City's final offer remains below compensation increases received by other bargaining units. She stated that over 60% of the union's members are funded outside the General Fund. She added that AFSCME's current contract was lower compared to other union contracts. She noted that AFSCME was at the forefront to include longevity pay, which were denied, only for the Classification and Compensation study to reveal low benefits. She added that other labor groups now receive longevity pay, while the benefit had been removed from negotiations for AFSCME, due to the potential expansion of longevity pay Citywide. She questioned increases to Executive Management salaries while positions represented by AFSCME continue to face wage compaction with employees they supervise. She urged the City Council to implement longevity pay for all City employees. Nick Burki, speaking on behalf of AFSCME, commented on the union's efforts to address compaction issues affecting its members. He explained that prior to union representation, management and confidential employees went without salary increases for many years and lost over 22% of purchasing power. He noted that after organizing, members received increases of 31 % over the course of five years and two contracts. He expressed concern that the union's current negotiations for a fourth -year wage adjustment have been more difficult than prior negotiations. He reported regressive negotiations where proposals have been withdrawn during other proposals. He stated that union members continue to experience salary compaction, retention challenges, and increased workloads. He added that some supervisors earn less than the employees they supervise and exempt employees are expected to remain beyond standard work hours. He expressed concern that Anaheim is increasingly viewed as a stepping stone to other employment opportunities rather than a long-term career destination and urged the City to address compensation and retention concerns. City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that no electronic public comments were submitted related to the Closed Session agenda. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 2 of 43 CLOSED SESSION: At 3:08 p.m., Mayor Aitken recessed to closed session for consideration of the following: 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (d)(1) of Section 54956.9 of the California Government Code) Name of Case: David Santana v. City of Anaheim, et al.; USDC Case No. 8:25-cv-01327 JWH (DFMx) 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of California Government Code Section 54956.9): One potential case 3. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Subdivision (a) of Section 54957.6 of the California Government Code) Agency Designated Representative: Linda Andal, Human Resources Director Name of Employee Organization: Anaheim Police Association 4. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS (Subdivision (a) of Section 54957.6 of the California Government Code) Agency Designated Representative: Linda Andal, Human Resources Director Name of Employee Organizations: (1) American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (General Management, Professional/Technical, and Confidential Units); (2) Anaheim Firefighters Association, Local 2899; (3) Anaheim Municipal Employees Association (General, Clerical, and Part -Time Units); (4) Anaheim Municipal Employees Association, Police Cadet Unit; (5) Anaheim Police Association; (6) Anaheim Police Management Association; (7) International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW), Local 47; (8) IBEW, Local 47 Part -Time Service Employees; (9) International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 47 (Professional Management and Part -Time Management Units) (10) Service Employees' International Union, United Service Workers West; (11) Teamsters, Local 952. At 5:29 p.m., Mayor Aitken reconvened the Anaheim City Council. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Ashleigh E. Aitken and Council Members Carlos A. Leon, Ryan Balius, Natalie Rubalcava, Norma Campos Kurtz, Kristen M Maahs, and Natalie Meeks INVOCATION: Pastor Paulo Maciel, Dwelling Place Anaheim FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Natalie Rubalcava PRESENTATIONS: Recognizing Sydney Tran from El Rancho Charter School for winning the Orange County Spelling Bee for a second consecutive year and for representing Orange County at the national spelling bee in Washington, D.C. Mayor Aitken recognized El Rancho Charter School student Sydney Tran for winning the Orange County Spelling Bee for the second consecutive year. She stated that her success reflects hours of preparation and planning. She highlighted her supportive family and teachers that encouraged her along the way. She added that Sydney would be representing Orange County at the Scripps National Spelling Bee in May. She congratulated her on her accomplishments. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 3 of 43 Sydney Tran thanked the City Council for the recognition, the Orange County Department of Education, and the Orange Unified School District. She thanked her teachers, counselors, her family, and friends for their continued support. Recognizing the owners of Superior Laundry and LaundryUp for partnering with the Anaheim Union High School District to provide students access to free laundry services Mayor Aitken recognized the owners of Superior Laundry and LaundryUp for their generous support of Anaheim students. She shared that many students face basic needs challenges, including access to clean clothing for school attendance. She highlighted that the family -owned businesses partnered with Anaheim Union High School District to provide nearly $9,000 in laundry vouchers to support students and their families experiencing financial hardship. She thanked both Superior Laundry and LaundryUp for their generosity and commitment to supporting local students. Patrick Lee and Corey Lee accepted the recognition. Patrick Lee thanked the Mayor, City Council, the Anaheim Union High School District, and community partners for the recognition. He acknowledged his brother and business partner, Corey, and his family, who began the businesses more than 30 years ago. He expressed pride in participating in a program that assists students and families, emphasizing that access to clean clothing can have a meaningful impact on a student's confidence and ability to attend school. He expressed appreciation for serving the community. He shared that there are two laundromat locations in Anaheim and LaundryUp provides pickup and delivery laundry services throughout Orange County. Recognizing the Savanna High School Girls Basketball Team for winning their CIF Division Championship Mayor Aitken recognized the Savanna High School Girls Basketball Team for winning their first CIF Southern Section Championship, with a 46-25 win over Warren High School. She stated that the win is a milestone for the school and a testament to the hard work of the team. She thanked the coaches and parents for their dedication to the team. ACCEPTANCE OF OTHER RECOGNITIONS To be presented at a later date): Recognizing April 24, 2026, as National Arbor Day Recognizing April 19 — 25, 2026, as National Library Week Library Services Manager Joe Purtell spoke about the role of the Anaheim Public Library in fostering community connections and providing educational and recreational opportunities for residents. He stated that libraries are an important community resource that extends beyond books and traditional services by offering innovative programs that encourage learning, creativity, and social engagement. He highlighted several library programs, including the annual Anaheim Public Library's "AnaCon" event, which brings together writers, illustrators, and community members through family -friendly activities focused on anime, comics, and creative arts. He shared other recurring programs, including "Stay and Play", which provides opportunities for young children and parents to socialize, develop skills, and build community connections in a safe and welcoming environment. He highlighted the Library's Open Mic Night program, which offers residents a space to share creative works, achievements, and to engage with others in the community. He thanked the City Council for its continued support of the Anaheim Public Library and efforts to connect residents through meaningful programs and services. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 4 of 43 Recognizing April 2026, as National Poetry Month Poet Laureate Camille Hernandez addressed the City Council and reflected on her two-year tenure, emphasizing the importance of reading, literacy, and the literary arts in building empathy and strengthening the community. She shared that her work has focused on expanding literary programming throughout Anaheim. She highlighted significant growth in community engagement, including increased participation in local literacy arts initiatives and submissions to the Anaheim Poetry Review. She noted partnerships with the Muzeo to partner visual arts with literary arts, and create zines from the event to publish the work of local artists. She highlighted partnerships with the Anaheim Public Library to create events. She spoke about the important role that libraries played in her childhood and her commitment or creating similar opportunities for Anaheim residents. She emphasized the value of continued investment in public arts, literacy arts, and literacy programs. She shared a poem inspired by a mural at Brookhurst Park named Anaheim, City of Kindness. Recognizing April 2026, as Arts, Culture, and Creativity Month Recognizing April/May 2026, as Affordable and Fair Housing Month Recognizing May 2026, as Water Awareness Month Anaheim Public Utilities Water Quality Laboratory Supervisor Eleanor Busito thanked the City Council for the recognition. She described her role in overseeing water quality testing throughout the City and shared that her team conducts water quality analyses and collaborates with regional agencies to ensure Anaheim's drinking water meets all federal and state regulatory standards. She stated that Water Awareness Month provides an opportunity to educate residents and students about water quality, conservation, and careers in the water industry. She announced that Anaheim Public Utilities would host students from Stoddard Elementary School at Center Greens Park for educational activities and demonstrations, followed by a community event where residents could learn about water conservation, water quality, and the City's Capital Improvement Project. She invited the public to participate and learn more about Anaheim's water services. At 5:52 p.m., Mayor Aitken called to order the Anaheim Public Financing Authority, in joint session with the City Council. ADDITIONS/DELETIONS TO THE AGENDAS: City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that staff requested to continue Item No. 23 to the May 5, 2026 City Council meeting. She added that staff requested to remove Item No. 21 from consideration and staff would present the item at a later date. PUBLIC COMMENTS (all agenda items. except public hearinq). Prior to receipt of public comments, City Clerk Theresa Bass provided an outline of procedures for public comments, notice of translation services, and a brief decorum statement. City Clerk Theresa Bass reported that a total of 83 public comments were received electronically prior to 4:30 P.M. [A final total of 109 public comments were received electronically, distributed to the City Council, and made part of the official records]. — See Appendix. Erika Nguyen, Chair of the Cultural and Heritage Commission, stated that it had been an honor to participate in the nomination and approval process for Poet Laureate Camille Hernandez. She thanked the City Council for recognizing April as Arts, Culture, and Creativity Month. She shared that she is a founding member of the Chance Theater and highlighted the theater's more than 26 years of service to the community through storytelling, arts education, and accessible programming. She City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 5 of 43 recognized recent and upcoming productions, including The Messenger, Sanctuary City, and Jagged Little Pill. She reported that the Chance Observatory classes are open and highlighted the new Chance Choir. She announced that the Orange County Theater Guild Awards would be held on May 11'h at the Segerstrom Center for the Arts. She noted that Chance Theater received 47 nominations, the most of any theater company. She thanked the City Council for its continued leadership and support. R. Joshua Collins highlighted the services being provided in Item No. 22 regarding psychological evaluations for the Anaheim Police Department. He expressed support for conducting evaluations for police personnel but questioned whether new psychologists would be used compared to 2013 and whether evaluations address bias, officer conduct, and public safety. He referenced statistics related to Police use of force, arrests, and misconduct complaints, and called for additional transparency and accountability measures. He requested the release of the unedited body camera footage for the death of Albert Arzola. He advocated for expanded service to the unhoused population, safer parking, walk-in shelters, and encouraged the City Council to pursue meaningful change. Bulmaro Vicente with CHISPA, spoke in opposition to Item No. 7, regarding the expansion of automatic license plate reader technology. He expressed concerns about the potential sharing of information with federal agencies, including immigration enforcement entities, and noted that some jurisdictions have re-evaluated or terminated similar contracts. He urged the City Council to examine how license plate reader data is used, shared, and audited. He questioned whether adequate safeguards and community engagement efforts have been implemented, particularly for immigrant communities. He noted that expanding surveillance technology could conflict with existing City initiatives to support immigrant residents. Stef spoke in opposition to Item No. 7. She stated that the Council had previously shown support for immigrant communities and expressed concern that the automatic license plate readers could facilitate immigration enforcement activities. She requested accountability from the Police Department in the death of Albert Arzola. She called for the release of the names of the officers involved and the autopsy report. She demanded justice for the Arzola family and change for the safety of the community. She urged the City Council to oppose Item No. 7. Juanita Lopez identified herself as the grandmother of Albert Arzola. She requested the names of the officers involved and demanded justice for her grandson. She expressed her grief over the loss of her grandson. Matt Compton called for the release of the 911 call recordings and the identities of the officers involved in the death of Albert Arzola. He stated that the Arzola family has continued to seek information and accountability and urged the City Council and the Anaheim Police Department to provide additional transparency over the incident. He expressed concern over police practices and accountability within the community. He called for justice and accountability for the death of Albert Arzola and the release of the names of the officers involved. He expressed opposition to Item No. 7 and reiterated the request for justice and accountability in the death of Albert Arzola. David Pulido demanded justice in the death of Albert Arzola. He expressed concern over racial bias in the Anaheim Police Department and referenced previous deaths involving the Anaheim Police Department. He called for accountability and the release of the identities of the officers involved. He expressed concern over the alleged harassment of the Arzola family. He opposed the proposed expansion of automatic license plate readers due to the impacts on the working-class and Latino community. He called for a democratically elected commission to ensure accountability by the Police Department. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 6 of 43 Adlai Carrillo addressed the City Council regarding the death of Albert Arzola and expressed concerns regarding police practices, transparency, and accountability. He questioned the use of gang suppression units in the community and the contact made with Albert Arzola. He referenced his experience with firearms and raised concerns over officer tactics, decision -making, and use -of -force practices. He shared his personal experiences with law enforcement which influenced his perception of policing and community trust. He commented on alleged harassment of the Arzola family and expressed concern regarding a lack of communication, transparency, and accountability from the Anaheim Police Department. He urged the City to provide answers to the family, restore community trust, and provide justice for Albert Arzola. Christine Lopez addressed the City Council seeking justice and accountability for the death of Albert Arzola. She emphasized that officers should employ investigative and de-escalation practices when responding to calls. She called for the release of the identities of the officers involved and the autopsy report. She raised questions regarding vacancies on the Police Review Board and outreach efforts to fill those vacancies. She shared information regarding her nephew and his love for the City and requested transparency and accountability for his death. Leslie Lopez raised concerns regarding accessibility at City Council meetings which have prevented family members from attending. She shared her family's experience following the death of her cousin, Albert Arzola. She expressed concerns regarding the circumstances of his death and the Anaheim Police Department's use of force. She shared that her family has relied on faith and community support during their grieving process. She requested that the City Council hold an additional community meeting to provide updates and information regarding the case. She called for transparency and accountability to restore trust in the community. Rosie Camacho spoke about the impact of her son, Albert Arzola's, death on her family. She stated that she witnessed the incident and expressed grief, frustration, and a loss of trust in law enforcement. She alleged that members of her family have experienced harassment by the Police Department. She requested a meeting with the Chief of Police to discuss the status of the investigation into her son's death. She called for justice and accountability for her son's death. Pearl Arzola expressed opposition for Item No. 7 for automated license plate readers. She stated that the City should prioritize greater oversight and accountability of law enforcement. She questioned the effectiveness of current surveillance measures to address crime. She discussed her family's continued efforts to seek justice and accountability following the death of her brother Albert Arzola. She expressed concern regarding police conduct, officer screening, training practices, and alleged harassment toward the family. She criticized police response efforts to a call for service near her home and questioned the use of department resources. She requested increased accountability, transparency and engagement with the community. Grace Arzola spoke in opposition to Item No. 7, expressing concerns over how the data from the automated license plate readers would be collected, used, or shared in the future, particularly with federal immigration enforcement. She shared that community concerns over surveillance and transparency had not been fully addressed. She expressed frustration over the lack of information released regarding the death of her nephew Albert Arzola. She commented on Item No. 22 and emphasized the importance of conducting a thorough and competitive process for psychological evaluation firms. She questioned the use of body -worn cameras in the incident involving her nephew. She requested accountability and transparency. Tom Fielder addressed the City Council regarding transparency and public trust related to the City's drinking water quality. He emphasized that public confidence in the water quality depends on timely communication, transparency, and access to information. He referenced public records concerning PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) detections in Well 51 serving the West Anaheim area and City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 7 of 43 questioned the timeline between State notification, the shutdown of the well, and notification to the City Council. He reported the effects of PFAS contamination in the body, including immune system suppression, thyroid disruption, and liver damage. He requested greater transparency regarding water quality decisions, timelines, and communication to residents. G. Price expressed concern regarding the timeline of the shutdown of Well 51 following the detection of PFAS. She stated that the dates of contamination detection, State notification, and removal of the well from service, determined whether the public was notified of the shutdown in a timely manner. She questioned why Well 51 remained in operation for an extended period after PFAS levels exceeded State notification thresholds and noted discrepancies between reported dates for when the well was taken offline. She requested clarification regarding the timeline and requested further explanation on the decision -making process. She emphasized that maintaining public confidence in the water quality requires transparency, consistency, and clear communication to residents. Marc Herbert addressed the City Council regarding water quality monitoring and requested greater transparency about the City's water sampling practices. He questioned whether compliance samples accurately reflect typical water conditions experienced by residents or conditions that may be temporarily improved through operational practices such as hydrant flushing. He noted resident concerns regarding water discoloration and chlorine odors and asked for clarification on the City's sampling protocols, including whether hydrant flushing occurs before or after compliance testing, under what circumstances such activities take place, and whether these practices are disclosed when water quality results are reported to the public or the City Council. He emphasized that public trust is dependent on transparency and encouraged the City to provide additional information regarding sampling procedures and oversight by State agencies. He concluded by expressing support for the Arzola family. Stephanie Mercadante expressed concern over public trust and transparency related to the City's water quality. She requested that the presentation for Item No. 30 address discrepancies in the shutdown date for Well 51 and the State's notification, and clarification on whether operational practices affect water sampling results. She raised concerns over resident reports regarding chlorine odors, water discoloration, and inconsistent water quality and whether the information is made available to the public. She inquired whether water sampling practices are reviewed by outside agencies. She emphasized the importance of transparency, consistency, and availability of data to maintain public trust in the City's drinking water. Dave Duran referenced prior comments made by the Mayor regarding Anaheim's water quality at the March 24' Council meeting. He expressed concern that residents may not have received timely information regarding PFAS detections and water quality issues. He encouraged residents, business owners, and members of the public to test their drinking water and contact federal agencies with questions or concerns regarding water safety. He referenced a news article regarding PFAS detection in Anaheim water systems. Tanya Navarro, Organizing Director for CHISPA, spoke in opposition to Item No. 7. She expressed support for the family of Albert Arzola. She raised concerns regarding privacy, civil liberties, and the sharing of license plate reader information with federal agencies. She explained that expanding surveillance without accountability would not create safety and would disproportionately affect immigrant communities and communities of color. She requested that the City conduct and release a comprehensive audit of the existing license plate reader program regarding usage, effectiveness, data access, and safeguards against misuse. She added that meaningful community engagement should occur before expansion is considered. She urged the Council to postpone action until additional public input and transparency are provided. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 8 of 43 Kelsey Gordon urged the City Council to oppose Item No. 7 for the purchase of additional automated license plate readers. She expressed concerns regarding increased surveillance, data collection, and data sharing with other agencies. She explained that the license plate readers could impact immigrant communities and that the proposal conflicts with City initiatives to support immigrant residents. She noted concerns about privacy, data access, and the implications of expanding surveillance infrastructure. She urged the City Council to deny Item No. 7 and requested an independent public audit of the existing License Plate Reader program, greater community engagement, and investments in alternative public safety strategies. She expressed support for the Arzola family. Gustavo Castillo expressed support for the family of Albert Arzola and called for the release of the names of the officers involved in his death. He spoke in opposition to Item No. 7. He explained that increased surveillance does not enhance community safety and may impact marginalized communities. He expressed concerns about data sharing, potential access by federal agencies, and the long-term implications of expanding surveillance infrastructure. He acknowledged the Anaheim Contigo Fund and Legal Defense Fund as positive investments in the community; however, he noted that additional license plate readers would not align with those efforts. He explained that the community needs assistance and investments in housing, community services, and other programs that directly support residents. Marie Cofinco addressed the City Council regarding the death of her nephew, Fermin Vincent Valenzuela, during an encounter with Anaheim police officers in 2016. She recounted the incident and expressed concerns about officer training, supervision, and use -of -force practices. She referenced testimony presented during the civil trial and the officer's recollection of formal training related to the carotid restraint. She noted that a jury awarded damages to Mr. Valenzuela's children and determined violations of constitutional rights. She shared the impact that the loss had on her family. Vern Nelson spoke in opposition to Item No. 7 and expressed concerns over privacy, increased surveillance, and the potential use of data collected for immigration enforcement. He urged the Council to pull the item for further discussion. He highlighted community efforts by the Arzola family and noted increased civic engagement and voter registration. He called for accountability for the death of Albert Arzola and questioned whether enhanced services for Item No. 22 for psychological evaluations could prevent similar incidents. He provided an update on a local rent control petition, noting that organizers continue to collect signatures. He shared concerns regarding rising housing costs and displacement due to rent increases. Karla Navarro urged the City Council to oppose Item No. 7 to purchase additional license plate readers. She explained that expanding surveillance technology conflicts with the City's support for immigrant communities and raised concerns about potential data sharing with immigration enforcement agencies. She reported that the technology can collect detailed vehicle information including license plates, vehicle descriptions, and identifying features. She expressed concerns over privacy, data storage, ownership, access, safeguards against misuse, and third -party access with potential for the data to be shared beyond local jurisdictions. She urged the Council to oppose the item and voiced support for the Arzola family. Silvia Camacho spoke in opposition to Item No. 7 and called for police accountability. She expressed her grief over the death of her nephew Albert Arzola and called for accountability for his death. Adriana Moreno introduced herself as the new Executive Director of the Anaheim Community Foundation and expressed appreciation for the opportunity to serve the Anaheim community. She noted that during her first weeks in the role, she has met with community partners, residents, and stakeholders and has been encouraged by the support and engagement. She highlighted the City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 9 of 43 Foundation's more than 40 years of service to Anaheim and shared that in 2025, the organization awarded 332 grants totaling more than $177,000 to organizations serving Anaheim residents. She thanked the City Council for naming the Foundation as the recipient charity for the State of the City event. She noted that the funds were reinvested into the community through support for 57 local nonprofit organizations. She acknowledged the City's partnership in helping the Foundation secure a permanent office location and expressed her commitment to collaborating with the City Council and community partners to continue expanding opportunities and strengthening the community. Ruben Greg Soto shared personal views regarding religion and family. He expressed concern about law enforcement based on his personal experiences. Mazatl Tepehyolotzin thanked Council Member Kurtz and City staff for engaging with residents in neighborhood communities and identifying local needs, including sidewalk improvements, landscaping updates to conserve water, and addressing conditions in alleys and public spaces. He called for improvements along the railroad corridor near Olive Street and Vermont Avenue, and suggested adding a bicycle and pedestrian trail similar to projects in neighboring cities. He commented on rising living costs, including gas prices, renaming local schools or mascots. Art Castillo shared his personal experience with the Anaheim Police Department. He stated that the experiences shaped his long-term involvement in community advocacy and police accountability efforts. He expressed concern regarding prior use -of -force incidents, including the death of Fermin Vincent Valenzuela, and urged the City Council to acknowledge previous statements made about the incidents. He referenced concerns made by family members who reported feeling intimidated following City Council meetings. He called for changes to the Police Review Board to allow for additional accountability measures. Dana Baker requested assistance with housing and rental support. He explained that he recently lost a caregiving employment opportunity after a client passed away and was seeking new employment. He added that he needs to relocate by the end of May following the death of his landlord. He shared his background in social work and education administration and discussed his financial challenges despite a long professional career. He noted ongoing health concerns. He requested assistance or information regarding available resources. Christine shared her experience attending the College and Career Fair at the Anaheim Convention Center. She suggested separating the event into distinct college and career fairs. She explained that while the event provided valuable information, many students were still exploring potential career paths and would benefit from greater exposure to various professions. She recommended expanding opportunities for students to interact with professionals from different industries to help them discover their interests, better understand future employment opportunities, and make more informed decisions about education and career planning. She emphasized the importance of presenting alternatives to traditional college pathways, including military service and other career opportunities, to support students in identifying paths that align with their interests and goals. Sergio Pelayo expressed his support for the family of Albert Arzola and called for greater transparency related to his death. He noted that four months had passed since his death and the identity of the officers involved had not been released. He expressed concern about police accountability, the use of body -worn cameras, and department policies. He voiced support for the psychological evaluations for Item No. 22. He reiterated requests for the autopsy of Albert Arzola and further information related to his death. Sherlock Li, a student at Acaciawood Preparatory Academy, spoke about educational access for low- income families. He advocated for programs such as school vouchers and tax -credit scholarships that would allow funding to follow students to the schools their families choose. He stated that many City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 10 of 43 families face financial barriers that limit educational options and noted that many families make significant sacrifices to afford private school. He explained that expanding school choice opportunities would provide additional options for families seeking educational environments that meet their children's academic and safety needs. He concluded that access to supportive learning environments should be available to all students regardless of income. Bryan Kaye reflected on changes within the Anaheim Police Department since 2017. He noted that interactions with police leadership have become more constructive and transparent over time. He commented on a recent meeting with a Police Department staff member who engaged with him. He emphasized the importance of public participation in City Council meetings, noting that community advocacy and resident engagement contribute to positive changes in local government and public safety practices. He encouraged City leaders to continue fostering communication with residents and to remain committed to improving transparency and responsiveness. Bethel Enriquez, a student at Acaciawood Preparatory Academy, spoke about the importance of educational support and opportunities for students. She emphasized that while students possess significant potential, access to encouragement, guidance, and information is essential to help achieve their goals. She noted that many students lack awareness of available career pathways, college options, and steps necessary to pursue them. She highlighted the value of college and career fairs in exposing students to different professions, educational opportunities, and role models who can inspire future aspirations. She encouraged the City Council to support and expand programs that provide students with access to college and career exploration opportunities, including increased funding for college and career fairs. William Chiang and David Chiang, representing Acaciawood High School, expressed concerns related to public transportation following the shutdown of the Anaheim Transportation Network. He stated that many residents, workers, and students depend on affordable and reliable transit services. He noted that reduced transportation options could increase traffic congestion, raise commuting costs, and create additional challenges for individuals with limited mobility alternatives. They encouraged the City Council to continue exploring ways to improve and expand transportation services to ensure Anaheim remains accessible and connected for all residents. Mark Richard Daniels reflected on his life in Anaheim and the significant changes he has witnessed in the City, including within the Police Department. He referenced the death of Fermin Vincent Valenzuela and expressed solidarity with the Arzola family. He urged the City Council to provide closure to the family and transparency. He encouraged continued community advocacy and peaceful demonstrations in pursuit of justice and accountability. COUNCIL COMMUNICATIONS: Mayor Aitken congratulated the students from Acaciawood Preparatory Academy for attending the Council meeting and speaking during Public Comments. She acknowledged and appreciated the respectful participation of the students. She requested an update from City Attorney Robert Fabela regarding the release of the officer's information in the Arzola case. In response to Mayor Aitken's request, City Attorney Robert Fabela announced that outside counsel released the name of the officer at 6:56 p.m. to the Arzola family's attorney. In response to Mayor Aitken, City Attorney Fabela stated that the City Attorney's Office does not review the autopsy report and would follow up with the Orange County Coroner's Office. Council Member Kurtz thanked OCO and the Olive Street Elementary School community for participating in a neighborhood walk led by residents and school leaders. She thanked City staff, including Director of Public Works Rudy Emami, Public Utilities General Manager Dukku Lee, and City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 11 of 43 Community Services, for attending. She shared that during the walk, many issues were identified, including broken sidewalks and parking issues, which would be evaluated. She added that as a result of the walk, the neighborhood requested support for a neighborhood clean-up which would be planned in the following months. Council Member Kurtz provided an update on the ATID Housing Committee and introduced the Committee members, including Chairperson Bill O'Connell, Co - Chairperson Greg Eisenman, Director of Community Services Sjany Larson -Cash, Paul Sanford, and Susan Santana. She explained that the Committee represents large, medium, small, and independent hotels overseeing the ATID Housing Trust Fund to support employees of ATID payees. She congratulated the Committee for meeting and the Housing and Community Development Department for their assistance. Council Member Kurtz reported that the National Association for Industrial and Office Parks (NAIOP) challenged teams from Chapman University and UCI to envision a development on the corner of Ball Road and Anaheim Boulevard, in partnership with the City's Economic Development Department. She shared that Chapman University won the project, but mentioned UCI's unique development, similar to the Sphere in Las Vegas. She highlighted Chapman's development, which included public spaces, affordable housing, and retail components. She congratulated Chapman University and thanked the Economic Development Department for working with the students. Council Member Kurtz shared that Betsy Ross Elementary School serves as a school that is open early and late for parents and serves as a center of the community. She reported that her office and other City departments participated in the Community Resource Fair hosted by Betsy Ross Elementary School. She shared that many parents and students learned about resources available to them and the commitment the City departments have in the neighborhoods and residents. Council Member Kurtz acknowledged that the Olive Street neighborhood lacks an easily accessible community center or gathering space. She shared that as a result, Olive Street Elementary School opened its campus to residents to ensure they have a place to gather. She thanked Public Utilities, Fire & Rescue, the City Clerk's Office, Public Works, and Planning for participating. Council Member Maahs reported that the Miracle League of Orange County season has begun through June 7tn, every Sunday at noon at Pioneer Park located in District 5. She shared that the league welcomes players of all abilities and each player is paired with a buddy on their assigned team. She thanked the volunteers from Mater Dei High School for their support of the athletes. Council Member Maahs shared that there would be a floral art installation at Juarez Park on Sunday, April 26tn. She invited families and the community to enjoy the live public art. She encouraged picnics and mentioned that the first couple of hundred children would receive paletas. She shared that the event is in collaboration with Martha Rangel and Victoria's Garden. Council Member Maahs requested to adjourn the meeting in memory of Rebecca Kuhl, wife of Angel's Foundation President Dennis Kuhl, who passed away on April 71n Mayor Pro Tern Leon announced his attendance at the first Robotics Southern California State Championship. He shared that students all over Southern California learned important engineering problem -solving skills to compete and collaborate with one another. He congratulated the participants and highlighted their bright futures. Mayor Pro Tem Leon expressed his gratitude to the Neighborhood Services team and Interim City Manager Greg Garcia for a recent neighborhood cleanup effort in District 2. He announced that each household is entitled to three bulky item pickups for free. He advised residents to call ahead before placing items on the street. He shared that the effort is a small step to keeping neighborhoods clean and maintaining the quality of life each resident deserves. For additional information, residents can call 714-238-2444 or visit Anaheim. net/republicservices. Mayor Pro Tern Leon shared that his office organized the Fourth Annual Children's Day Fair at Barton Park. He mentioned that kids enjoyed games, arts, crafts, snow cones, popcorn, snacks, candy, and toys. He highlighted the spirit of the event and the bonds and interactions in the community. He thanked Rosary Academy volunteers for bringing activities to the event and helped with set-up and clean-up. He thanked the Barton Elementary PTA for providing City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 12 of 43 snow cones and all the community partners who attended. He highlighted the Parks and Recreation team, Public Works, and all City staff who ensured the park was ready for the event. He noted the attendance of Congressman Lou Correa, Anaheim Union High School District Trustee Guerrero, and Anaheim Elementary School District Superintendent Chavarria. He recognized the volunteers, his staff, Angie, Kelly, Richard, and Sandra. Council Member Rubalcava shared that a groundbreaking was held for a new Porsche dealership along the Interstate 5 corridor. She shared that the initiative is part of a larger revitalization in District 3. She added that the dealership would join the new Zia apartments, for -sale homes at Emerald Park, JR Wheels and Tires, and Radiant Beer Co. She noted that the dealership would enhance the neighborhood and generate tax revenue. She thanked Porsche and former City Manager Jim Vanderpool, who helped bring the dealership to the community. Council Member Rubalcava shared that Public Utilities held an outreach event on Mavis Street, where residents received energy efficiency resources. She noted that staff identified opportunities to improve lighting and public safety. She thanked Public Works, the Police Chief, and the Police Department for engaging in the process with the neighborhood. Council Member Rubalcava thanked the Community Services Department and the Anaheim Police Department for visiting neighborhoods in District 3. She shared that they visited the Balsam East community which fostered positive interactions with the community. She added that the event fostered positive interactions between the Police Department and older youth to deter gang activity. She thanked Public Utilities for providing pencil pouches to kids. Council Member Rubalcava recognized Earth Day participation through a community cleanup hosted by Green Bird, near Little People's Park. She thanked the organization's leaders, Jody and Kevin, for their ongoing volunteer efforts to keep neighborhoods clean. She encouraged residents to participate in community volunteer efforts and to contact her office for assistance in connecting with local opportunities. Council Member Rubalcava requested to adjourn the meeting in memory of Jad Davis, a well - regarded attorney in Orange County. She shared that he grew up in Anaheim and unexpectedly passed away on April 2"d. She sent her condolences to his family and his children. Council Member Balius reported that on Saturday, April 25th, a Young Professional Summit would be held at the Tiger Woods Learning Lab from 9:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. He shared that the event is free for any high school students to help them explore potential career paths and build real -world skills. Council Member Balius announced that he toured Fire Station 12 and Fire Station 4. He noted that the fire truck at Fire Station 4 would be in operation in late July or early August. Mayor Aitken shared that Council Member Balius and Mayor Pro Tern Leon joined her and the Public Utilities Department at Twila Reid Elementary School to plant a tree in celebration of Earth Day. She noted that the Public Utilities Department has given away over 60,000 trees and would be restarting the program. She reported that residents can apply on the City's website for up to six shade trees a year, with a promotion currently running to receive an additional tree. Mayor Aitken thanked the Hispanic Chamber of Commerce for inviting her to the Estrella Awards and congratulated the new board installed. She shared that the program highlights family -owned businesses throughout Orange County. Mayor Aitken announced that she would be adjourning the meeting in memory of former Anaheim Mayor John Seymour. She shared that he was Anaheim's 39th Mayor from 1978 to 1982. She noted that he was known for bringing the Rams to Angels Stadium where they played for 14 years. She added that he served on the Planning Commission from 1970 to 1994 and was appointed by Governor Wilson as a United States Senator. She noted that he was the only United States Senator from Orange County. She shared that he advocated for the transformative power of homeownership and prided himself on working with everyone. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 13 of 43 CITY MANAGER'S UPDATE: Interim City Manager Greg Garcia announced that the Cinco de Mayo event would be held on Saturday, May 2nd from 12 p.m. to 8 p.m. He shared that students from the Anaheim Elementary and Magnolia School Districts would be performing along with live bands, food trucks, children's activities, and more. Interim City Manager Garcia reported that there would be an open house at the Anaheim Sustainability Education Center on April 25th from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. He introduced Director of Human Resources Linda Andal to provide an update on the City Manager recruitment process. Director Andal announced that the Human Resources Department distributed the Request for Information (RFI) to ten (10) executive firms with demonstrated experience in recruiting city managers and city CEO's. She reported that the Department received six (6) responses, two declining to participate, and two with no response. She added that the Executive team is reviewing the RFI's, which would be presented to the City Council on May 121h or June 9th. She reported that the presentation would include a request from Council to select a firm to move forward with contract negotiations and proceed with recruitment. At 8:15 p.m., Mayor Aitken recessed the City Council to address the Anaheim Public Financing Authority agenda, and reconvened at 8:16 p.m. CONSENT CALENDAR: At 8:16 p.m., the Consent Calendar was considered with Council Member Rubalcava pulling Item No. 7, Mayor Pro Tern Leon pulling Item Nos. 7, 12, 15, 16, and 27, and Council Member Kurtz pulling Item No. 13 for separate consideration. MOTION: Council Member Kurtz moved to waive reading of the ordinances and resolutions and adopt the balance of the consent calendar as presented, in accordance with reports, certifications, and recommendations furnished each City Council Member, seconded by Council Member Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES — 0. Motion carried. B105 3. Receive and file minutes of the Cultural and Heritage Commission meeting of February 19, 2026; and the Older Adults Commission meeting of February 19, 2026. B105 4. Appoint two new members to the Anaheim Workforce Development Board with terms ending June 30, 2030 (Luis Aleman, representing business; and Jimmy Elrod, representing labor). D116 5• Approve certificates recognizing Public Works employee Jose Sanchez for his role in stopping an assault on a mother and her daughter; the Anaheim Police Department for placing first in their category and fifth overall at the 2026 Baker to Vegas Challenge Cup Relay; and Irving Schwartz on the occasion of his 100th birthday. D116 6• Receive and file, with the possibility of discussion, the list of Professional Services Agreements authorized by the City Manager and the list of Visit Anaheim Subcontractor Agreements approved by the Executive Director of Convention, Sports, and Entertainment for March 2026. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 14 of 43 AGR-15919 8. Approve Contract Number No. MA 106-498975 with Johnson Controls Fire Protection LP, in an amount not to exceed $543,631.15 inclusive of all applicable taxes and a 20% contingency, for testing, inspections, and emergency repair services for the fire suppression system at the Anaheim Convention Center for a one year term; and authorize the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute all necessary contractual documents related to the agreement in accordance with Sourcewell Cooperative Master Agreement No. 121024-JHN. AGR-15920 9• Approve Contract No. MA 106-499047 with Daniels Tire Service, in the amount of $26,541.12, for a cumulative combined amount of $132,705.60 plus applicable sales tax, CPI annual increases, and a 20% contingency, to provide recapped tire services on an as -needed basis for the Public Works Department for an initial one year term with four one-year optional renewals; and authorize the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute all necessary contractual documents and to exercise the renewal options as appropriate in accordance with Invitation for Bids No. 9865. D180 10. Authorize a two month extension of the existing master agreement with R.J. Noble Company for as -needed purchase of various asphalt concrete paving materials and the disposal of construction debris, increasing the total cumulative not to exceed amount from $1,200,000 to $1,300,000. AGR-15921 11 Award a contract to the lowest responsible bidder, J&S Striping, in the amount of $71,341.87, plus a 10% contingency, for the installation of signing and striping at ten local roadways; authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the contract and related documents and to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the contract; determine that the project is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Class 1, Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) and Class 2, Section 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction); and direct and authorize the Finance Director to execute the Escrow Agreement pertaining to contract retentions [Agate Street, Baxter Street, Bel Air Street, Danbrook Avenue, Gerda Drive, Greenacre Avenue, Greenleaf Avenue, Janss Street, Moonstone Street, And Santa Ana Street]. AGR-15924 14. Approve a Cooperative Agreement with the City of Buena Park, in an amount not to exceed $56,000 plus a 10% contingency for a total authorized amount of $61,600, for Anaheim's share of the construction of the Dale Street Rehabilitation from Crescent Avenue to State Route 91 Project, and authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to execute the agreement and related documents and to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the agreement. AGR-15934 17. Approve the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement of Tract No. 19290 with MTHCALV-1 Santa Ana Street, LLC, to establish a 2-lot subdivision for condominium purposes to construct 56-condominiums with private drives, generally located at 275 and 301 East Santa Ana Street. AGR-15935 18. Approve an agreement with Disability Access Consultants, LLC, in an amount not to exceed $178,480 per term for a total amount not to exceed $535,440, to provide professional consulting services related to the Americans with Disabilities Act for a two year term with two two-year optional extensions; and authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 15 of 43 execute the agreement and related documents including extensions and to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the agreement. 19. Accept Round 2 Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) funding totaling D155 $1,691,750 per Modification No. 1 to the WIOA Subgrant Agreement for Subgrant No. AA611002 between the City of Anaheim and the State of California, pursuant to Resolution No. 2025-087. 20 Approve Amendment No. 2 to Bond Purchase Agreement between the City of Anaheim, the AGR-14901.2 Public Financing Authority, and JP Morgan amending the scheduled completion date to no later than June 25, 2027 for the parking decks associated with the OCVIBE Project; and authorize the Finance Director to execute the amendment [related to Authority Item No. 1]. 21 Approve the Second Amendment to Agreement with MuniServices, LLC, increasing the not to D128 exceed amount from $300,000 to $450,000 and increasing the term by three years with three one-year optional renewals, for auditing, reporting, monitoring, and analysis of sales and use tax revenues; and authorize the Finance Director to execute the amendment and to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the amended agreement. Item No. 21 was withdrawn by staff. 22. Approve agreements with Eric Gruver, Ph.D. and Nancy K. Bohl, Inc., dba The Counseling AGR-15936 Team International, Inc., each in an amount not to exceed $300,000, to provide pre- AGR-15937 employment psychological evaluations and other psychological services for the Anaheim Police Department and Anaheim Fire & Rescue Department, for a three-year period, with the option to extend up to two additional years. 23. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE D154 CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting a Memorandum of Understanding establishing terms and conditions of employment for employees represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 47 - General Unit [effective January 1, 2026 through December 31, 2028]. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adopting a Memorandum of Understanding establishing terms and conditions of employment for employees represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 47 — Professional Management Unit & Part -Time Management Unit [effective January 17, 2026 through January 16, 2029]. Amend the Fiscal Year 2025/26 budget accordingly by $2,602,560. Item No. 23 was continued to the City Council meeting of May 5, 2026. 24. Approve the implementation of Phase I, in part, based on the Segal Company, Western D154.1 States, Inc. (Segal) Citywide classification and compensation study, by realigning base salary D154.2 ranges for specified classifications within the Non -Represented Non -Management and D 154.9 City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 16 of 43 Executive Management groups to support the City's recruitment and retention strategy, while addressing internal equity and compensation compaction; and amend the Fiscal Year 2025/2026 budget by $368,441 for the cost of unrepresented Phase I implementation and minimum wage compliance. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-030 _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending Resolution No. 2025-030, as amended, for the purpose of increasing salaries pursuant to the State of California minimum wage requirements, modifying pay policies for classifications designated as Non -Represented Full -Time and Part -Time, and amending certain Non -Represented Part -Time and Executive Management Compensation plans to align with the City's adopted market -position strategy. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-031 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending Resolution No. 2026-006, for the purpose of modifying pay policies for certain classifications represented by the Anaheim Municipal Employees Association, General Employees. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-032 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending Resolution No. 2026-007, for the purpose of modifying pay policies for certain classifications represented by the Anaheim Municipal Employees Association, Clerical Employees. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-033 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending Resolution No. 2023-081, for the purpose of modifying pay policies for certain classifications represented by the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Local 2002, General Management Unit. RESOLUTION NO. _2026-034 _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending Resolution No. 2023-082, for the purpose of modifying pay policies for certain classifications represented by the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Local 2002, Professional/Technical Management Unit. D113 25. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-035 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM authorizing the destruction of certain City records more than two years old in accordance with the City's Retention Schedules and Government Code (City Administration, City Attorney, City Clerk, Community Services, Convention, Sports & Entertainment, Finance, Fire & Rescue, Housing & Community Development, Planning & Building, Police, Public Works, and Public Utilities). AGR-15938 26. RESOLUTION NO. _2026-03_6_ _ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ratifying and approving the actions of the Anaheim Director of Public Works, or designee, in submitting a grant application on behalf of the City of Anaheim to the California Department of Transportation (CALTRANS) for the Clean California Community Cleanup and Employment Pathway (CCEP) grant funds, and authorizing the acceptance of such grant on behalf of the City and amending the budget accordingly; and determine that these actions are exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Guideline Section 15306. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 17 of 43 Waive the competitive bid requirements of Council Policy 4.0 and approve Master Agreement Contract No.106-499083 with Orange County Conservation Corps, in an amount not to exceed $500,000, to provide various recycling and cleanup of litter and debris as needed for the Public Works Department for the period of April 30, 2026 through April 30, 2027; and authorize the Purchasing Agent, or designee, to execute all necessary contractual documents [includes $87,375 in local match and in -kind contributions]. M142 28. ORDINANCE NO. _6625 (ADOPTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM amending Chapter 17.08 (Subdivisions), Chapter 17.34 (Development Fees) and Chapter 17.36 (Public Safety Facilities and Vehicle Equipment Impact Fees) of Title 17 (Land Development and Resources) of the Anaheim Municipal Code and finding and determining that this ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15060(c)(2), 15060(c)(3) and 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment because there is no possibility that it may have a significant effect on the environment and because it is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA [introduced at the Council meeting of March 24, 2026, Public Hearing Item No. 29]. BUSINESS CALENDAR: D180 7. Authorize the issuance of Purchase Order Nos. 309-408212 and 309-407722 to Motorola Solutions, Inc., in a cumulative amount not to exceed $736,334.32, for the purchase of Motorola Automated License Plate Reader equipment, including the licensing and encompassing warranty; and authorize the Purchasing Agent to execute all necessary contractual documents in accordance with Sourcewell Cooperative Agreement No.101223- M OT. Chief of Police Manuel Cid introduced Lieutenant Jimmy Rodriguez and Sergeant Jared Dewald who oversee the Real Time Crime Center. Lieutenant Rodriguez reported that the item is for the purchase of Motorola Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) equipment. He stated that the purchase would fund 72 ALPR cameras, including 11 cameras for the Resort area funded by the Anaheim Police Foundation, 20 cameras placed throughout the City funded by the BSCC Organized Retail Theft Grant, and the remaining 41 cameras would be funded with the Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) Grant. DISCUSSION: Council Member Rubalcava requested additional information on data preservation and sharing. She inquired about the number of cameras currently in the City. Lieutenant Rodriguez stated that 18 cameras were currently active in the City. He noted that there had been diminished capacity over the past 16 years since the use of ALPR's. He added that the Department initially acquired grants through grant funds from 2012. Council Member Rubalcava requested additional information on how the license plate readers would be used. She mentioned her previous support of the equipment due to street racing issues. She emphasized that the intent was not contemplated to assist immigration enforcement. Lieutenant Rodriguez explained that ALPR's were not surveillance cameras. He reported that the cameras would be stagnant, placed in thoroughfares in the City. He explained that the information is not used or run through a criminal justice information system. He stated that the information was City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 18 of 43 stored in a database provided by Motorola and compared to the Criminal Justice Information System. He reported that if there is a match to a vehicle, law enforcement receives an alert and must verify the information before taking any action. In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Chief Cid reported that any data collected was from public spaces where, from a legal standpoint, there is no expectation of privacy. He emphasized that the Police Department's policies, oversight measures, audits, and training are in place to ensure proper use. He explained that the Department does not share ALPR data with federal agencies for immigration enforcement, including Homeland Security and the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). He noted that SIB 54, Police Department policy, contractual safeguards, and periodic audits govern data access, sharing, and compliance. Council Member Rubalcava requested additional information regarding the ALPR audit process, particularly whether the City could require audits or third -party agencies to ensure collected data was not being sold or improperly shared, acknowledging concerns raised by community members. Chief Cid clarified that the City would be unable to audit a third -party company. He explained that the company could open themselves to significant litigation or a damaged reputation if they violated the terms and conditions in the contract. He noted that the Department conducts periodic internal audits to review data -sharing practices, verify authorized access, and ensure appropriate use. In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Chief Cid stated that while there is no legal expectation of privacy on public streets, including in residential areas, ALPR cameras are generally installed along major roadways and primary access routes to capture vehicle movement, assist investigations, and help identify vehicles entering or leaving neighborhoods following criminal activity. In response to Council Member Rubalcava, Chief Cid explained that ALPR's capture images of vehicles and license plates, allowing law enforcement to check information through DMV and law enforcement databases for stolen vehicles, warrants, or missing persons. He added that the system also stores vehicle characteristics, including make, model, and color, which could be used for investigations to identify possible suspect vehicles based on witness descriptions and other available information. Council Member Rubalcava requested additional information on the number of crimes solved using ALPR's. Mayor Pro Tern Leon acknowledged community concerns regarding law enforcement technology, particularly among immigrant residents, and emphasized the importance of providing accurate information to avoid creating unnecessary fear. He highlighted Anaheim's role as a major visitor destination and the City's responsibility to maintain public safety and requested clarification on whether ALPR's could be used to track undocumented immigrants. Chief Cid stated that under State law, ALPR data cannot be used to track undocumented immigrants. He emphasized that the system is used only for specific criminal investigations and to identify vehicles potentially connected to crimes. He reiterated that the Department does not engage in immigration enforcement or use technology for that purpose. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Leon, Chief Cid confirmed that the data is not shared with ICE or federal agencies. He emphasized that the City does not participate in immigration enforcement. He explained that data is shared only with California -based law enforcement agencies subject to State law, including municipal police departments, sheriff's departments, and the California Highway Patrol. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 19 of 43 He noted that per SIB 54, the department does not share data with agencies outside of California to prevent any potential indirect sharing with federal immigration authorities. Mayor Pro Tem Leon inquired about the retention policy for the data. Chief Cid stated that ALPR data was generally retained for one year, with exceptions made for information associated with criminal investigations or civil litigation, which may be preserved for a longer period consistent with other evidence retention practices. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Chief Cid reported that the data would be used for investigative purposes with legal and policy reasoning for the use. He emphasized that the system is not connected to dispatch functions, 911 operations, or efforts to identify an individual's immigration status. Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested clarification on whether the City's agreement includes contractual provisions prohibiting the sharing of data with federal agencies. Chief Cid confirmed that the agreement explicitly includes provisions that the City retains ownership and control over ALPR data, including decisions regarding data sharing. He noted that any unauthorized sharing of data by the vendor would constitute a breach of contract and could subject the company to legal action and significant reputational consequences. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Chief Cid confirmed that the Department regularly reviews policies and practices to ensure compliance with State law, particularly in areas where legal requirements most directly affect law enforcement operations. Mayor Pro Tem Leon inquired whether federal agencies have requested the information for immigration enforcement and if they would be granted access. Chief Cid reported that under his leadership, the Department has not shared data with federal immigration agencies and noted that the interactions have decreased in recent years. He emphasized that State law, Department policy and practices prohibit sharing data for immigration enforcement purposes. Mayor Pro Tem Leon acknowledged community concerns and fears related to federal immigration enforcement, emphasizing that the concerns are legitimate and should not be dismissed. He stated that the additional cameras are intended for public safety measures and not an immigration enforcement tool. He highlighted ALPR's role in protecting residents, visitors, employees, and critical infrastructure in the Resort area. Chief Cid confirmed that the ALPR system is designed to identify stolen vehicles and assist in detecting potential threats to public safety. He confirmed that cameras and ALPR's have become essential tools in modern policing. He explained that they serve as important resources for crime - solving, investigations, emergency response efforts, and preparedness for critical incidents. He noted that technologies are increasingly relied upon by law enforcement agencies nationwide and throughout the region. Mayor Pro Tem Leon provided comments in Spanish clarifying that the purpose of the automated license plate readers are strictly for public safety and not immigration enforcement. Council Member Maahs inquired whether the cameras were hidden or visible. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 20 of 43 Lieutenant Rodriguez explained that license plate readers are installed openly and were not covert or hidden. He noted that the cameras are visible in public locations and could be readily identified by residents. Council Member Maahs stated that many residents view visible cameras as a deterrent to crime and expressed interest in expanding their use. She referenced a recent incident at another agency involving a misuse of law enforcement technology and inquired what safeguards were in place to prevent improper use of ALPR's and other law enforcement tools. Chief Cid explained that there are numerous safeguards that govern the use of ALPR's and other law enforcement databases, including mandatory training, strict policies requiring a legitimate law enforcement purpose for access, and periodic audits to monitor usage. He emphasized that personal use of the systems is prohibited and may result in disciplinary action, criminal charges, or termination, and noted that audits are conducted to ensure data access is tied to legitimate investigations and to detect any potential misuse. In response to Council Member Kurtz, Lieutenant Rodriguez stated that the Resort area is considered critical infrastructure for the City and currently has no ALPR's installed. He explained that the proposed deployment would focus on the Resort area and other key locations, such as utility infrastructure, to establish a network of cameras that would help monitor major access points and create a protective perimeter around the Resort area. Council Member Kurtz requested additional information on how the funding for the Resort cameras was secured by the Anaheim Police Foundation. Lieutenant Rodriguez explained that Resort area stakeholders expressed concerns about the absence of ALPR's and contributed funding through the Anaheim Police Foundation to support enhanced public safety infrastructure. He stated that Police Department staff determined that installing ALPR's was the most effective use of the funds. Council Member Meeks expressed support for the ALPR program, noting that the cameras have helped solve crimes and contribute to public safety. She inquired whether information could be shared with out-of-state authorities in certain circumstances. Chief Cid stated that the Department would share ALPR information in connection with legitimate criminal investigations, including cases involving other states or federal law enforcement agencies, provided the information is not used for immigration enforcement. He confirmed that the Police Department would not provide access to the entire database. Council Member Meeks highlighted the importance of using ALPR technology to assist in solving crimes and locating missing persons. She inquired whether the City has thoroughly evaluated the vendor's cybersecurity measures and whether staff were confident that adequate protections were in place to safeguard the data from unauthorized access or breaches. Chief Cid expressed confidence in the vendor's cybersecurity protections, noting that the company is a large, established provider widely used by law enforcement agencies nationwide and possesses significant technological resources and infrastructure. He stated that Motorola's capabilities exceed what many local governments could independently provide and affirmed confidence in the safeguards protecting the data. Lieutenant Rodriguez added that the City has been using the specific platform for 14 years and has been the most reliable for the ALPR technology. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 21 of 43 Council Member Balius expressed support for the ALPR program and requested additional information regarding cybersecurity safeguards. He referenced concerns raised by community members regarding vulnerabilities involving Motorola products. He inquired what procedures Motorola had in place to identify, address, and ensure the security of data transmissions and connections between cameras and the hosting database. Lieutenant Rodriguez stated that there have been no incidents or concerns indicating a data breach in the system. He explained that the contract terms and conditions were negotiated over two years, with involvement from the City Attorney's Office and purchasing staff, to ensure adequate protections are in place and to minimize potential cybersecurity vulnerabilities. In response to Council Member Balius, Lieutenant Rodriguez explained that the data is stored in a cloud housed by a third party, which is more effective and efficient for the City. He noted that it comes in a package deal from the third -party entity. Council Member Balius inquired if the database is shared with other clients. Lieutenant Rodriguez explained that the ALPR information is stored in a secure cloud -based system controlled by the City and not shared with unauthorized entities. In response to Council Member Balius, Lieutenant Rodriguez stated that the database is shared with authorized entities and specific State agencies. Council Member Balius inquired whether the ALPR system uses the most current encryption technology to secure data transmissions from the cameras to storage systems. Lieutenant Rodriguez confirmed that Motorola uses the most up-to-date technology. MOTION: Council Member Meeks moved to authorize the issuance of Purchase Order Nos. 309- 408212 and 309-407722 to Motorola Solutions, Inc., in a cumulative amount not to exceed $736,334.32, for the purchase of Motorola Automated License Plate Reader equipment, including the licensing and encompassing warranty; and authorize the Purchasing Agent to execute all necessary contractual documents in accordance with Sourcewell Cooperative Agreement No.101223-MOT, seconded by Council Member Rubalcava. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES — 0. Motion carried. AGR-15922 12. Award a contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Toro Enterprises, Inc., in the amount of $3,825,688, for the Brookhurst Street Improvements from Cerritos Avenue to 150 feet North of Guinida Lane Project; authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the contract and related documents and to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the contract; and authorize and direct the Finance Director to execute the Escrow Agreement pertaining to contract retentions. Director of Public Works Rudy Emami reported that the project addresses a key traffic area by widening the west side of Brookhurst to provide a third southbound lane, improving traffic flow, safety, and overall corridor capacity. He stated that the work includes roadway widening, paving, drainage, utilities, sidewalk, landscaping, and traffic system upgrades. He reported that Toro Enterprises was the lowest responsible bidder at $3.8 million, below the engineer's estimate. He noted that the County of Orange would reimburse the City for work within its right-of-way. He added that construction was anticipated to begin the second quarter of 2026 and would be completed by the end of the year. He City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 22 of 43 reported that the project supports the City's Strategic Plan goal to improve major corridors and maintain pavement conditions. Mayor Pro Tern Leon inquired about construction staging plans for the project, noting concerns about impacts to the busy corridor and nearby small businesses, and plans for business outreach and notification during construction. Director Emami confirmed that the project specifications require extensive communication outreach during construction. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Leon, Director Emami reported that roadway lane closures associated with the project would occur between 8:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to minimize traffic impacts, while some ancillary work may occur outside those hours as needed. Mayor Pro Tern Leon requested additional details regarding traffic management during construction, specifically how southbound traffic would be accommodated and whether lane closures would be necessary during project activities. Director Emami reported that during off-peak hours, lane closures may be required with one lane remaining open to traffic. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Leon, Director Emami stated that bus stops would remain in service whenever safe access can be maintained during construction. He noted that if necessary, bus stops would be temporarily relocated nearby, with signage and ride notifications provided. He clarified that bus routes would not be rerouted around the construction area. Mayor Pro Tern Leon inquired whether the project would include a dedicated bike lane throughout the corridor and requested clarification on the overall design and safety enhancements for cyclists. Director Emami explained that the project would include a dedicated bike lane along the edge of the roadway, mirroring the existing configuration on the northbound side. He added that the remaining segment had been deferred previously due to required County right-of-way acquisition, which has been completed, allowing the City to finish the planned bicycle improvement. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Leon, Director Emami noted that the project includes some roadway paving, resulting in limited impacts within the project area. He added that staff are evaluating improvements north of the project area, within the commercial corridor, where speeding concerns have been identified. He clarified that paving would take place within the area of the project. He explained that the initial striping plan covered the entire corridor but the Anita/Cerritos midsection was deferred until right-of-way issues could be resolved. Mayor Pro Tern Leon requested clarification on whether businesses located in the commercial center on the east side of the corridor, would receive advance notice about upcoming construction activities. He acknowledged the work is occurring on the opposite side of the street but noted that local businesses may still experience impacts and emphasized the importance of proactive outreach and communication. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 23 of 43 Director Emami confirmed staff could reach out to other areas that could be impacted. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Leon, Director Emami confirmed that the project would begin in June. Mayor Aitken raised concerns about wider travel lanes contributing to increased vehicle speeds and reduced safety for pedestrians and bicyclists. He inquired whether the restriping component of the project could include narrower vehicle lanes, wider bicycle lanes, or other design changes intended to calm traffic. She inquired about planned hardscape and landscaping improvements, including medians or other traffic -calming measures, that could be incorporated to improve safety along the corridor. Director Emami explained that the original Brookhurst improvement project transformed the corridor from a four -lane roadway planned for six lanes by incorporating median islands and controlled left - turn movements, resulting in a substantial reduction in collisions and improved safety. He reported that traffic -calming strategies, including lane narrowing, continue to be considered Citywide, particularly when full roadway repaving projects are undertaken to maintain consistent striping through an entire corridor. He emphasized that the Brookhurst improvements have significantly reduced accidents and enhanced overall roadway safety. In response to Mayor Aitken, Director Emami clarified that the significant reduction in collisions and safety improvements resulted from the larger Brookhurst corridor project completed ten years ago, extending from Katella Avenue to Ball Road. He explained that the current project is a gap closure segment that was previously deferred because the County had not acquired the necessary right-of- way. He confirmed that the project would complete the remaining section to provide continuity along the corridor. Mayor Aitken inquired if the project would include hardscape or landscaping. Director Emami noted that median improvements and landscaping were completed as part of the earlier Brookhurst corridor project, including a widening parkway and swale area on the west side that was possible through previous right-of-way acquisitions. Mayor Pro Tern Leon expressed support for completing the Brookhurst gap closure project but raised concerns that the improved segment may not be visually consistent with the surrounding roadway. He encouraged staff to explore potential funding opportunities to enhance roadway uniformity along the corridor, if feasible, while acknowledging the significant costs associated with broader paving improvements. Director Emami reported that the City has been advocating for additional SB 1 and gas tax funding from the County to support roadway improvements. He noted that a proposal to distribute a portion of the funds to cities would be presented at the Orange County Transportation Authority Technical Advisory Committee meeting. He explained that additional funding would help address repaving, restriping, and ongoing roadway maintenance needs. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Leon moved to award a contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Toro Enterprises, Inc., in the amount of $3,825,688, for the Brookhurst Street Improvements from Cerritos Avenue to 150 feet North of Guinida Lane Project; authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the contract and related documents and to take the necessary actions to implement and administer the contract; and authorize and direct the Finance Director to execute the Escrow Agreement pertaining to contract retentions, seconded by Council Member Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 24 of 43 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks). NOES — 0. Motion carried. AGR-15923 13. Determine that the proposal submitted by Aubrey Silvey Enterprises, Inc. is the most advantageous to the City; award a Design -Build Agreement in substantial form, to Aubrey Silvey Enterprises, Inc., in the amount of $51,382,062, plus a 10% contingency, to design and construct the Vermont Substation Expansion Project; waive any irregularities in any of the proposal documents; determine that the project and all related construction activities associated therewith are categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3) Sections 15301(b), 15302(c), 15303(d)-(e), 15304, and 15332; and further determine that none of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply; authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to execute the Design - Build Agreement and all related documents, including cost -neutral amendments and take all the necessary actions to implement and administer the agreement; authorize changes to the Agreement that do not materially change the terms and conditions of the Agreement, as determined by the City Attorney's Office, and authorize the Risk Manager to approve changes to the insurance, indemnification, and liability provisions of the Agreement as long as the changes are in Anaheim's best interest, and authorize the Finance Director to execute the Escrow Agreement pertaining to contract retentions in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22300. Public Utilities General Manager Dukku Lee reported that the item was an expansion project to the Vermont Substation located in the Utility yard. He stated that the Vermont Substation was currently the second point of delivery to the regional grid and serves as a very critical reliability function. He added that it was constructed in 2008 to connect substations, but it does not currently serve customers. He reported that the project for consideration is to expand and equip the substation to customers. General Manager Lee explained that the need for expansion is to maintain reliability due to increased activity in Anaheim housing development electrification to align with State policies, and commercial and industrial overloads, which put additional demands on existing substations and high voltage circuits. He reported that the Vermont Substation would give field crews and operators more tools, including the ability to offload circuits with higher demands or reroute power when needed. He emphasized the importance due to power outages which require Public Utilities to place customers on other circuits to make repairs. General Manager Lee reported that the project would be located in the Public Utilities yard, where inventory equipment was kept, field crews and vehicles were housed, and training was conducted. He stated that the existing substation was located in the center of the parcel, and bounded to the west by the Metrolink rail line. He addressed impacts to nearby homes and schools. He noted that Public Utilities is cognizant of traffic impacts during school drop-off and pick-up times. He reported that Public Utilities would schedule deliveries of large equipment to avoid those hours. He added that the City was coordinating with the Vermont Avenue undergrounding project to install additional conduits concurrently, reducing the need for future street excavations and helping address infrastructure proximity concerns near residential areas. He highlighted the newly constructed block walls to address ongoing efforts to address theft and vandalism and a visual break for residents to avoid seeing the utility equipment. He noted that the walls would also reduce noise and dust from the facility. He stated that large transformers enclosed but ventilated with louvers would include sound dampening to reduce the noise from the transformers and allow necessary cooling to prevent City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 25 of 43 overheating. He added that the enclosure was another way to provide a visual break for residents and add an additional layer of protection. General Manager Lee stated that the Public Works Department administered the Design -Build beginning with the Request for Qualifications. He noted that following an evaluation of the proposals submitted, staff recommended awarding the contract to Aubrey Silvey Enterprises. He reported that Aubrey Silvey previously built the Anaheim Substation, located near the Anaheim Packing House. He stated that the project cost was $51.4 million and would be paid for through electric rates and supported through a revenue bond issued last year. He added that Public Utilities redirected budget savings in the City's Power Supply budget, with no impact on the General Fund. He reported that the timeline is three years for design, equipment, procurement, construction, with a completion date in 2029. General Manager Lee highlighted outreach efforts, including hosting a community information meeting at the Sustainability Education Center and mailers to nearby businesses, including project information and staff contacts. DISCUSSION: Council Member Kurtz highlighted the importance of visiting schools and hosting community events at the Sustainability Center for the public's awareness. She inquired whether staff anticipated any closures on Vermont Avenue. General Manager Lee explained that the work would be focused inside the utility yard. He noted that there would be occasions when equipment would be delivered and large vehicles would be passing through; however, staff would schedule the deliveries around times to avoid impacting traffic. Council Member Kurtz requested that large vehicles enter Vermont Avenue from East Street to avoid passing through neighborhoods on Vermont Avenue. Director Emami stated that construction deliveries would be routed via East Street to South Street before entering the project site. He added that the contractor had been directed to keep construction activity and traffic contained on -site to minimize impacts on surrounding streets. MOTION: Council Member Kurtz moved to determine that the proposal submitted by Aubrey Silvey Enterprises, Inc. is the most advantageous to the City; award a Design -Build Agreement in substantial form, to Aubrey Silvey Enterprises, Inc., in the amount of $51,382,062, plus a 10% contingency, to design and construct the Vermont Substation Expansion Project; waive any irregularities in any of the proposal documents; determine that the project and all related construction activities associated therewith are categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3) Sections 15301(b), 15302(c), 15303(d)-(e), 15304, and 15332; and further determine that none of the exceptions to the categorical exemptions set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply; authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to execute the Design -Build Agreement and all related documents, including cost -neutral amendments and take all the necessary actions to implement and administer the agreement; authorize changes to the Agreement that do not materially change the terms and conditions of the Agreement, as determined by the City Attorney's Office, and authorize the Risk Manager to approve changes to the insurance, indemnification, and liability provisions of the Agreement as long as the changes are in Anaheim's best interest, and authorize the Finance Director to execute the Escrow Agreement pertaining to contract retentions in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22300, seconded by Council Member Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES — 0. Motion carried. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 26 of 43 AGR-15925 15. Approve eight Professional Services Agreements, each in an amount not to exceed $600,000 AGR-15926 per year for a total amount for each not to exceed $3,000,000, for on -call consulting support AGR-15927 services for Clean Water Act Permit Compliance Programs for the Development Services AGR-15928 Section of the Department of Public Works, for a one year term with four one-year optional AGR-15929 renewals, authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the agreements and take the AGR-15930 necessary actions to implement and administer the agreements; and authorize de minimis AGR-15931 changes that do not substantially change the terms and conditions of the agreements, so long AGR-15932 as such changes are determined to be de minimis by the City Attorney's Office [EEC Environmental, Fuscoe Engineering, Inc., Geosyntec Consultants, Inc., GSI Environmental, Inc., Michael Baker International Inc., Recupero and Associates, Inc., Tetra Tech, Inc., WSP USA Inc.]. DISCUSSION: Mayor Pro Tern Leon requested clarification on the funding availability in the FY 2026/27, which had not been approved. Director Emami explained that the contracts are approved in advance due to existing agreements expiring in August, and planning for the next fiscal year would be underway. He noted that the funding was available through August, and the reference to the FY 2026/27 budget was in anticipation of continued use of the consultants pending budget approval. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Leon moved to approve eight Professional Services Agreements, each in an amount not to exceed $600,000 per year for a total amount for each not to exceed $3,000,000, for on -call consulting support services for Clean Water Act Permit Compliance Programs for the Development Services Section of the Department of Public Works, for a one year term with four one- year optional renewals, authorize the Director of Public Works to execute the agreements and take the necessary actions to implement and administer the agreements; and authorize de minimis changes that do not substantially change the terms and conditions of the agreements, so long as such changes are determined to be de minimis by the City Attorney's Office [EEC Environmental, Fuscoe Engineering, Inc., Geosyntec Consultants, Inc., GSI Environmental, Inc., Michael Baker International Inc., Recupero and Associates, Inc., Tetra Tech, Inc., WSP USA Inc.], seconded by Council Member Kurtz. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES — 0. Motion carried. AGR-15933 16. Approve the Purchase and Sale Agreement with Servite High School, in the acquisition payment amount of $65,000, for the purchase of real property located at 1952 W. La Palma Avenue (APN 072-131-12), for a Storm Drain Easement for the La Palma Avenue Storm Drain Improvements Project; and authorize the Director of Public Works to accept City Deed No. 12924 (APN 072-131-12, ACQ 2025-01651) for property located at 1952 W. La Palma Avenue conveying to the City of Anaheim certain real property interests granted in conjunction with the project and authorize the City Clerk to attest and cause said Deed to be recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder. Director Emami reported that the item is for approval of a Purchase and Sale Agreement to acquire a Storm Drain Easement off La Palma Avenue. He explained that the acquisition was necessary for the La Palma Storm Drain Improvements project, which would address capacity limitations and reduce flooding in the area. He stated that the easement would be acquired from Servite High School for $65,000, which reflected fair market value. He noted that the acquisition would help move the La Palma Storm Drain Improvements project forward and improve storm water infrastructure and reliability. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 27 of 43 DISCUSSION: Mayor Pro Tem Leon requested additional information on flooding in the area. Director Emami stated that the flooding has been a long-standing issue. He explained that stormwater improvements in the area are constrained by the limited capacity of the downstream County Flood Control Channel despite the flat area. He reported that the project would incorporate stormwater retention and storage measures to manage runoff before releasing it into the County system. He highlighted the project as a success of the City's Stormwater Credit Program and noted that the approximately $15 million project is fully grant -funded, allowing the City to address a long- standing neighborhood flooding issue without using local funds. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Director Emami stated that the property was located at the end of the cul-de-sac along the west edge of Servite High School. Mayor Pro Tem Leon inquired if a grant had been secured for the project. Director Emami confirmed grant funds had been secured for the project and it is in the early design phase. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Director Emami explained that securing the easement will allow the storm drain to connect to La Palma Avenue. He reported that the project securing the easement will allow the storm drain to connect to La Palma Avenue. He added that staff have been coordinating with Servite representatives, who have identified additional area improvements that may be incorporated into the project to address the school's needs. Director Emami clarified the location of the easement, explaining that it is a small paved triangular area near Dogwood and Wichita Street, adjacent to but outside the high school's parking lot. He noted that the area is not used for parking or other school activities and that the storm drain will be constructed from Dogwood, through Wichita Street, and connect to La Palma Avenue. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, Director Emami confirmed that staff would coordinate with Servite to minimize construction impacts, including noise and disruptions to school operations. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Leon moved to approve the Purchase and Sale Agreement with Servite High School, in the acquisition payment amount of $65,000, for the purchase of real property located at 1952 W. La Palma Avenue (APN 072-131-12), for a Storm Drain Easement for the La Palma Avenue Storm Drain Improvements Project; and authorize the Director of Public Works to accept City Deed No. 12924 (APN 072-131-12, ACQ 2025-01651) for property located at 1952 W. La Palma Avenue conveying to the City of Anaheim certain real property interests granted in conjunction with the project and authorize the City Clerk to attest and cause said Deed to be recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder, seconded by Council Member Meeks. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES — 0. Motion carried. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 28 of 43 T107 27. RESOLUTION NO. - orming Underground Utility District No. 73 — Ball/Brookhurst and determining that said action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15301(b), 15302(c)-(d), and 15303 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. General Manager Lee reported that the item is a resolution to form the next Underground District identified in the Five -Year Plan. He stated that if approved, Anaheim Public Utilities (APU) would begin detailed design engineering and coordination activities with affected property owners. He reported that the proposed underground district is located along Ball Road from east of Brookhurst Street to west of Euclid Street. He highlighted other active undergrounding projects in the surrounding area. He noted that project limits are within proximity to adjacent schools, and staff would coordinate with the schools to ensure the project does not affect pick-up and drop-off times. General Manager Lee provided an overview of the project. He reported that the project is 1.3 miles of overhead wires that would be undergrounded, at an estimated cost of $12 million. He noted that the project would replace lights that are on wooden poles with new standalone street light poles, spaced to meet current roadway guidelines to enhance roadway visibility. He reported that staff would coordinate with the affected telecommunication companies who are on the poles and offer them the opportunity to joint trench. General Manager Lee reported that the Public Utilities Board held a public hearing on March 25'h. He shared that one email was received from a telecommunications company requesting to update their contact information and a phone call from a business that inquired about construction impacts. He stated that staff responded to both and assured the business that it would maintain access to their property during construction activities. He mentioned that no public comments were received in person during the hearing. He added that following the public hearing, the gas company submitted a letter stating that they had no transmission pipelines in the project area. General Manager Lee stated that the engineering and design coordination phase was estimated to take about a year and a half to complete, to work with many property owners as part of the easement process, to place equipment that serves the properties and other utilities and agencies. He reported that following the design, a bid package would be issued to prequalified high -voltage contractors. He noted that construction would take roughly 18 months. He displayed images of other projects to convey the types of civil construction activities that would be taking place. He noted that the new street light system would be installed and equipped with tamper -proof measures to mitigate wire theft. He added that as part of the undergrounding process, street resurfacing would be performed towards the end of the project. He reported that accommodations would be made during the civil construction process to allow for residents, schools, and businesses to continue their daily activities. General Manager Lee reported that once underground structures are complete, new underground equipment, including cables, transformers and switches, would be installed, and a combination of surface and below -ground equipment would be installed to convert each customer's electric service from overhead to the new underground system. He stated that when all conversions are complete, the overhead electrical facilities would be removed. He explained that based on the ordinance approved by City Council in 2024, communication companies would have one year from when the civil structures are complete to underground their facilities prior to the removal of the remaining portion of the utility poles. He thanked the public for its patience, explaining that the project requires a lengthy design and construction process and extensive coordination needed with affected property owners. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 29 of 43 DISCUSSION: Mayor Pro Tem Leon expressed appreciation to the Public Utilities team and the Public Utilities Board for advancing the project and acknowledged the extensive work involved. He recognized the value of the incremental infrastructure improvements occurring throughout the City and requested an outline of the project's major milestones, including design completion, easement acquisition, bid award, construction start, and other key phases that residents could follow throughout the project timeline. General Manager Lee explained that the project schedule is presented as a range of dates because easement acquisition timelines can vary and may affect the overall construction schedule. He noted that property owners have already received mailed notices about the project and anticipated timelines, and additional notifications would be provided as design progresses and construction approaches, giving residents opportunities to ask questions and address property access concerns. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Leon, General Manager Lee outlined the project's public outreach plan, stating that property owners have already received mailed notices about the public hearing and project. He explained that additional notifications would be provided before construction begins, including construction signage, street markings, mailed notices one to two weeks before any planned service outage, and door hangers 48 hours in advance. He noted that planned outages may last up to six to eight hours and emphasized that construction will progress in 100- to 200-foot segments to keep the public informed of ongoing work. Mayor Pro Tern Leon thanked staff for the outreach efforts and asked about coordination between the Public Utilities and Public Works departments regarding street paving. He acknowledged the efficiency of completing pavement restoration after underground work is finished, but expressed concerns about the current condition of Ball Road and inquired whether interim pavement repairs could be considered during construction to improve roadway conditions for residents until the project's completion. Director Emami emphasized the City's priority for keeping roads safe. He stated that staff would inspect the Ball Road segment to determine whether short-term repairs, such as crack sealing or pothole repairs, could be completed. He added that permanent pavement restoration is coordinated with utility projects to maximize funding efficiency and deliver a fully rehabilitated street upon project completion. Mayor Pro Tern Leon acknowledged the need for efficient project coordination but reiterated concerns about the current condition of Ball Road and encouraged consideration of interim improvements while the project progresses. He expressed appreciation to the Public Utilities team for all their work. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Leon moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2026-037 . A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM forming Underground Utility District No. 73 — Ball/Brookhurst and determining that said action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15301(b), 15302(c)-(d), and 15303 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, seconded by Council Member Balius. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 7 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Rubalcava, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES — 0. Motion carried. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 30 of 43 D125 29• Discuss options to remove billboards impacting neighborhoods in the City of Anaheim, and provide direction to staff. Interim City Manager Greg Garcia introduced the item and stated that the presentation would provide an overview of the City's existing billboard regulations, current conditions, and potential policy options, and requested Council direction on possible next steps. Director of Economic Development Sergio Ramirez reported that at the January 13, 2026 Council meeting, Council Member Maahs requested a discussion on addressing blight and billboards within the City. He reported that the City currently has 71 legal nonconforming/grandfathered static billboards, which many contribute to visual light due to deteriorating conditions. He stated that staff reviewed the City's longstanding prohibition on new billboards, including a freeway -oriented sign ban dating to 1958 and a broader billboard ban adopted in 2006, while noting that State -authorized special sign districts allow digital spectacular signs in designated areas near Angel Stadium and the Honda Center. Director Ramirez provided an overview of the City's existing billboard inventory and policy options. He explained that "digital spectaculars" are permitted only within designated special sign districts near Angel Stadium and the Honda Center due to their architectural design and scale. He stated that of the City's 71 legal nonconforming billboards, the majority are located in Districts 1, 2, and 5, with most owned by three major advertising companies, Clear Channel Media, Outfront Media, and Lamar. He explained that billboard sizes vary, with standard billboards typically measuring approximately 300 square feet and smaller displays measuring about 72 square feet. He presented four strategies for addressing billboards, including: maintaining the current Citywide prohibition and allow billboards to be removed over time through redevelopment and deterioration; creating a digital freeway billboard program that would allow new digital freeway signs in exchange for removing multiple existing neighborhood billboards; establishing an amortization program with a deadline for billboard removal; and pursuing condemnation to acquire and remove billboards. Director Ramirez noted that the first approach has reduced the number of billboards from 141 in 1991 to 71 today, requires minimal staff resources, and has no direct cost to the City, but does not accelerate billboard removal. He reported that for the second strategy, other jurisdictions have achieved the removal of approximately four to ten static billboards for each new digital freeway billboard. He explained that implementing such a program in Anaheim would require additional analysis and consultant assistance due to the regulatory and technical complexities involved. He reported that the 1967 Outdoor Advertising Act (OAA) requires both Caltrans and local approval for freeway -oriented billboards. He noted that most of Anaheim's freeway corridors are designated as landscaped by Caltrans, limiting new billboard placement, although a process exists to request declassification of specific freeway segments. He stated that staff also reviewed implementation approaches used by other jurisdictions, including requests for proposals, cap -and -replace ordinances, and direct negotiations with billboard operators. He explained that competitive processes generally produce more favorable terms, with other cities achieving removal ratios of four to ten static billboards for each new digital billboard and negotiating revenue -sharing agreements. He noted that Anaheim's high traffic volumes could potentially result in stronger financial returns under such a program. He outlined the third strategy to establish an amortization program requiring legal nonconforming billboards to be removed by a specified deadline after a reasonable period of continued operation, without compensation to billboard owners. He reported that the fourth strategy would use eminent domain to acquire and remove billboards, requiring the City to compensate owners at fair market value. He stated that if the Council wishes to pursue either the amortization or condemnation approach, the City Attorney's Office should conduct further legal evaluation before any ordinance is considered. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 31 of 43 DISCUSSION: Mayor Aiken thanked staff and Council Member Maahs for bringing forward the discussion and explained that the purpose of the item was to obtain preliminary Council direction before developing any formal policy proposals. She emphasized the need to determine whether the City's priority should be billboard blight reduction, revenue generation, or a combination of both. She expressed concern about the condition and content of some neighborhood billboards, noting that the current policy has resulted in only a limited reduction in billboards over the past two decades. She suggested exploring partnerships with billboard operators to relocate billboards to freeway corridors, establish revenue -sharing agreements, or provide space for City and community event messaging, and requested additional information about the history of the City's digital spectacular sign districts and the exemption for the billboards around OCVIBE, ARTIC, and Angels Stadium. Director Ramirez explained that the City's digital spectacular sign districts were authorized through special State legislation, with the ARTIC area implemented in 2014 and an additional district established in 2018. He noted that the City Attorney's Office could provide further clarification regarding the dates of the enabling legislation and the City's implementation of those provisions. In response to Mayor Aitken, Director Ramirez clarified that the display board at Angels Stadium would be considered spectacular because it is a monument with a digital display. Assistant City Attorney Leonie Mulvihill clarified that digital displays have been permitted only within designated special sign districts authorized by State legislation. She explained that the initial legislation created opportunities for transit facilities to generate maintenance revenue through advertising, leading to the City's implementation of the ARTIC Special Sign District. She noted that subsequent State legislation extended similar authority to qualifying stadiums and arenas, allowing additional digital advertising opportunities outside the standard permitting process established under the Outdoor Advertising Act. Mayor Aitken requested clarification on the process for removing Outdoor Advertising Act restrictions in designated freeway areas, specifically inquiring whether the City would work directly with Caltrans or pursue state legislation to allow potential new billboard locations. Community Investment Manager Ajay Kolluri explained that Caltrans has a formal process for requesting declassification of landscaped freeway segments under the Outdoor Advertising Act. He reported that requests may be submitted by the City or members of the public on a location -by - location basis, after which Caltrans conducts an inspection and determines whether the segment should remain classified as landscaped or be declassified based on existing conditions. Council Member Maahs thanked staff for the presentation and expressed interest in exploring a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) for a program that would remove neighborhood billboard blight while allowing a limited number of digital billboards if it provided significant public benefit to the City. She asked what factors contributed to the reduction in billboards between 1991 and 2006. Director Ramirez explained that the reduction in billboards was largely attributable to street widening projects and redevelopment. He noted that additional research would be required to determine the specific history of each billboard location and the circumstances surrounding individual removals. In response to Council Member Maahs, Director Ramirez explained that existing billboards are legal nonconforming structures and cannot be rebuilt if they are substantially damaged or destroyed. He noted that, aside from standard Code Enforcement responding to maintenance issues, the City does not currently have a formal program to monitor the condition of all existing billboards. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 32 of 43 Council Member Maahs requested clarification that, because of the City's special sign districts, billboards would continue to be permitted in designated areas around ARTIC, Angel Stadium, and the OCVIBE, meaning the City's billboard inventory would not be reduced to zero. Director Ramirez explained that Anaheim's special sign districts are unique because of the City's entertainment and sports venues. He noted that the presence of major arenas supports the use of architecturally designed digital spectacular signs within designated entertainment districts and that such digital displays are expected to remain in those areas. In response to Council Member Meeks, Director Ramirez explained that the special sign district legislation was originally enacted for entertainment venues in Los Angeles and noted that Anaheim later received similar authority for its sports and entertainment district. Council Member Meeks expressed support for maintaining digital spectacular signs within designated entertainment areas but voiced concerns about expanding digital freeway billboards near residential neighborhoods. She encouraged stronger Code Enforcement efforts to address poorly maintained billboards and remove structures that are no longer being lawfully operated. Assistant City Attorney Mulvihill confirmed that the Municipal Code prohibits billboards that are chipped, rusted, or otherwise in disrepair, and that such conditions are subject to code enforcement. In response to Council Member Meeks, Assistant City Attorney Mulvihill confirmed staff can begin the process to eliminate inactive billboards. Council Member Meeks stated that removing blighted billboards should be one of the City's highest priorities and questioned whether the billboard exchange programs used by other jurisdictions provided sufficient public benefit. She stated that any future digital billboard program should require a more substantial trade-off given the larger size and value of digital billboards. Director Ramirez explained that digital billboards are larger than static billboards. Council Member Meeks noted that digital billboards are significantly larger and can display multiple advertisements, making them substantially more valuable than traditional static billboards. She stated that any billboard exchange program should require the removal of a substantially greater number of static billboards to reflect the increased advertising capacity of digital displays. She expressed concerns that exchanging only a small number of static billboards for new digital billboards would provide insufficient community benefit and questioned whether the financial return justified additional digital signage, particularly near residential areas. She supported prioritizing Code Enforcement to address blighted billboards and requested further evaluation of an amortization program as a potential long-term strategy for removing existing billboards and improving neighborhood aesthetics. Council Member Kurtz echoed Council Member Meeks' comments and expressed concern over the effects digital display boards would have in neighborhoods. She emphasized that the City should use its existing Code Enforcement authority to address blighted billboards immediately and noted that similar enforcement approaches have been used for other City initiatives. She inquired whether the State permitting process for new billboards includes a public comment opportunity that would allow the City or residents to provide input on proposed billboard applications. Community Investment Manager Kolluri clarified that Caltrans' declassification of a freeway segment would not automatically allow a new billboard. He stated that any proposed billboard would still require local authorization and City approval through a public process, as Anaheim's existing ordinance prohibits new billboards outside the designated special sign districts. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 33 of 43 Council Member Rubalcava thanked staff for the research and effort devoted to the billboard policy discussion and expressed support for prioritizing the removal of blighted billboards through existing Code Enforcement. She noted concerns about graffiti and inappropriate advertising content on some billboards and encouraged enforcement of current maintenance standards. She inquired whether a billboard company had approached the City to request permission for additional digital billboards. Director Ramirez stated that multiple billboard companies have expressed interest in the City evaluating digital freeway billboards, specifically identifying Lamar and Clear Channel as companies that have approached the City regarding the concept. He confirmed their inquiries prompted the discussions which began a year ago. Council Member Rubalcava acknowledged that staff had been researching billboard policies for approximately a year but expressed concerns about expanding digital freeway billboards, citing potential visual impacts, driver distraction, and effects on nearby neighborhoods. She questioned whether the potential revenue would justify additional digital signage and emphasized the importance of protecting the City's character. She supported efforts to address blighted billboards through existing code enforcement, particularly along major corridors such as Lincoln Avenue and East Street. Council Member Balius expressed support for removing existing billboards but not for replacing them with new digital billboards elsewhere. He noted that billboard removal alone may not fully address neighborhood blight where overhead utility lines remain and emphasized the importance of comprehensive beautification efforts. He also supported stronger code enforcement to address deteriorated billboards, acknowledged that some property owners receive revenue from billboard leases, and stated that any future policy should prioritize complete blight reduction rather than exchanging one type of billboard for another. In response to Council Member Maahs, Director Ramirez reported that no specific number has been determined and that further research, consultant analysis, and discussions with billboard companies would be needed before returning to the Council with recommendations on potential locations, quantities, and billboard exchange ratios. Council Member Maahs stated that she had not received any public complaints regarding the existing digital spectacular signs along the 57 Freeway. In response to Council Member Meeks, Community Investment Manager Kolluri explained that jurisdictions use different billboard exchange formulas, including square -footage -based approaches, noting that under such a method, a smaller 72-square-foot billboard would not typically qualify for a one -for -one exchange with a larger 300-square-foot digital billboard. Mayor Aitken acknowledged concerns about digital billboards but noted they could be considered in carefully selected freeway locations that minimize impacts on neighborhoods, subject to Caltrans restrictions. She also expressed interest in the amortization option and asked staff to explain how establishing a deadline for billboard removal without compensation differs from the condemnation process. Assistant City Attorney Mulvihill explained that state law allows cities to require the removal of certain billboards in residential areas through an amortization process without compensation, provided billboard owners are given a legally required notice period based on the value of the billboard. She noted that, if the City chose to pursue this option, it would apply to eligible residential areas and would require further review of the City's existing code before initiating the removal timeline. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 34 of 43 Mayor Aitken asked whether the City has information on the advertising revenues generated by the major billboard companies, including the rates they charge advertisers, to better understand the financial value of existing billboards. She expressed support for pursuing an amortization program as an initial approach to reducing billboards and suggested that the City could separately evaluate limited digital billboard opportunities in appropriate locations if warranted. She commented that amortization appeared to be the most straightforward policy option. Director Ramirez stated that the purpose of the discussion was to obtain Council direction on potential next steps. Interim City Manager Garcia explained that based on the discussion, staff's understanding is that the Council was not directing staff to pursue additional study of a digital billboard conversion program at this time, but instead supported strengthening code enforcement for existing billboards and conducting further legal analysis of a potential amortization program, with staff to return with additional information or recommendations. Mayor Aitken asked whether staff could evaluate how billboard conversion formulas used by other cities might apply in Anaheim. Interim City Manager Garcia responded that Anaheim's unique characteristics, including its visitor traffic and freeway exposure, would likely require a consultant to analyze the local value of digital and static billboards and develop appropriate billboard exchange ratios tailored to the City. Mayor Aitken requested that any future analysis include an inventory of potential freeway billboard locations not restricted by landscaped freeway designations. Director Ramirez responded that such opportunities are very limited and noted that six of the City's existing 71 billboards are already freeway -oriented static signs. In response to Mayor Aitken, Director Ramirez clarified that one potential option would be to allow the conversion of an existing static freeway billboard to a digital display in exchange for the billboard operator removing multiple static billboards located within neighborhoods and commercial areas. Mayor Aitken expressed interest in evaluating whether converting existing freeway billboards to digital displays could incentivize the earlier removal of neighborhood billboards and requested that this option be included in any future analysis for Council consideration. Council Member Meeks reauested that any future analysis of digital billboard conversions include an evaluation of potential impacts on nearby residential properties to ensure that any proposed locations would not adversely affect surrounding neighborhoods. Council Member Kurtz requested additional information before authorizing a consultant study, including an inventory of potential freeway billboard locations, the number and ownership of existing neighborhood billboards, the applicability of the City's amortization ordinance, and the number of billboards with maintenance issues subject to code enforcement. She stated that this information would help the Council determine whether further consultant analysis is warranted. Deputy City Manager Ted White reported that in 2008 the City Council directed staff to prepare a RFP for a billboard exchange program, supported by a consultant -led analysis. He explained that, although one billboard company submitted a responsive proposal, negotiations ultimately ended without an agreement by 2010. He suggested providing the previous analysis to the Council as part City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 35 of 43 of the follow-up on amortization, noting that while financial figures are outdated, the study remains useful for understanding billboard exchange concepts and policy trade-offs. Interim City Manager Garcia recommended a phased approach, beginning with a comprehensive code enforcement review of the City's existing billboards to identify noncompliant structures and initiate corrective action where appropriate. He explained that evaluating potential freeway billboard locations would be more complex due to Caltrans regulations, property ownership, legislative requirements, and the need to avoid impacts on residential neighborhoods and existing special sign districts. He noted that any future evaluation of potential locations would likely require professional analysis, while committing to return to the Council with the results of the code compliance review of all 71 existing billboards. Mayor Aitken summarized the discussion, noting general Council support for increasing code enforcement efforts to address deteriorated and noncompliant billboards and encouraging public reporting of maintenance issues. She expressed continued reservations about adding new billboards but indicated that limited future options could be considered if they resulted in the removal of neighborhood billboards. She also voiced support for pursuing an amortization program and beginning that process to establish a long-term path for removing billboards from residential areas. Council Member Balius sought clarification regarding the Council's direction, asking whether the majority of the Council opposed pursuing billboard exchange programs and questioning whether staff was being directed to hire consultants to evaluate potential locations for new digital billboards. Interim City Manager Garcia clarified that no direction had been given to hire a consultant. Community Investment Manager Kolluri explained that consultant assistance would only be necessary if the Council later chose to pursue a detailed analysis of potential freeway billboard locations, as determining eligible sites under Caltrans regulations is technically complex and would benefit from independent expert evaluation. Interim City Manager Garcia clarified that consultant services would only be needed if the Council directed staff to explore potential locations for new billboards. Council Member Balius reiterated support for removing existing billboards but stated opposition to evaluating locations for additional billboards. Council Member Rubalcava expressed skepticism that a digital billboard program would provide meaningful financial benefits to the City, stating that billboard operators would likely receive the greatest economic advantage. She encouraged staff to prioritize existing revenue initiatives and focus efforts on addressing billboard blight and improving neighborhood aesthetics rather than evaluating locations for additional billboards. Interim City Manager Garcia explained that billboard agreements vary depending on the specific terms and whether the billboard is located on City -owned or private property. Council Member Rubalcava commented that billboards may generate less revenue than in the past due to the growth of social media and other advertising platforms, expressing skepticism that digital billboards would provide significant financial benefits to the City. Mayor Aitken asked staff to proceed with developing a proposed amortization policy and to provide existing background information without pursuing additional billboard conversion analysis at this time. She also requested a staff report summarizing code enforcement activity related to billboards, City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 36 of 43 including the number of complaints received, the enforcement process, and whether amortization could provide a more efficient means of addressing blighted billboards than the current code enforcement process. Interim City Manager Garcia stated that they would begin reviewing the condition of existing billboards and initiate code enforcement where warranted. He committed to keeping the Council informed through periodic memoranda on enforcement efforts and to working with the City Attorney's Office to further evaluate an amortization program, with the option of returning the matter to the Council for future consideration if appropriate. Director of Planning and Building Heather Allen sought confirmation that the Council supported a more proactive approach to billboard code enforcement. She noted that most remaining billboards are located on commercial, industrial, or railroad properties rather than residentially zoned land, and explained that billboard conditions may also be addressed under the City's public nuisance code, providing additional enforcement tools. She that the applicability of amortization would require further legal evaluation. Mayor Pro Tern Leon expressed support for enhanced billboard code enforcement but emphasized that those efforts should not divert code enforcement resources from other neighborhood priorities and existing enforcement responsibilities. Director Allen responded that the City has identified the locations of all 71 existing billboards, allowing area and corridor code enforcement officers to monitor billboard conditions as part of their regular field activities without significantly impacting other enforcement responsibilities. Discussion; no formal action taken by the City Council. D182 30. Receive a presentation and discuss information on water quality [informational item]. General Manager Lee introduced a presentation on Anaheim's water quality in response to a Council request. He introduced representatives from Anaheim Public Utilities (APU), the Orange County Water District (OCWD), and the State Water Resources Control Board's Division of Drinking Water, including Assistant General Manager of Water Services Craig Parker, OCWD Executive Director of Water Quality and Technical Resources Jason Dadakis, and District Engineer from the Santa Ana Field Office of the State Water Resources Control Board Oliver Pacifico, who outlined their respective roles in water operations, groundwater management, water quality monitoring, and regulatory oversight. He noted that the presentation would provide an overview of Anaheim's water system, the Orange County groundwater basin, and the regulatory framework governing drinking water quality. Assistant General Manager Parker provided an overview of Anaheim's water supply, explaining that more than 80% of the City's drinking water comes from the Orange County Groundwater Basin, with the remaining supply provided through imported water from the Metropolitan Water District via the State Water Project and the Colorado River. He described the City's cross -connection control program, which includes monitoring more than 11,000 backflow prevention devices to protect the drinking water system from contamination and noted that recent ordinance changes strengthened the City's authority to address potential health hazards. Assistant General Manager Parker reported that the City has invested more than $150 million to upgrade groundwater wells with advanced treatment systems, with 14 wells completed and four additional well upgrades currently in design. He highlighted the City's partnership with the Orange County Water District, national recognition for its water treatment program, and the operation of the City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 37 of 43 Lenain Water Treatment Plant, which treats imported water and provides a critical water source for firefighting. He outlined the City's comprehensive water quality monitoring program, including approximately 44,000 annual water quality tests, weekly sampling throughout the distribution system, routine reservoir cleaning, state regulatory inspections, and hydrant flushing to maintain water quality, disinfectant levels, and system reliability. He added that the City is evaluating additional reservoir mixing improvements to further enhance water quality and reduce the need for flushing. Mr. Dadakis provided an overview of the agency's mission to manage and protect the Orange County Groundwater Basin, which supplies approximately 85% of the drinking water for 2.5 million residents in north and central Orange County, including Anaheim. He described the groundwater basin as a critical underground storage reservoir and highlighted OCWD's efforts to replenish supplies through stormwater capture, Santa Ana River diversions, and the Groundwater Replenishment System, which purifies recycled water for groundwater recharge. He outlined OCWD's role in protecting water quality through comprehensive groundwater monitoring, laboratory testing, and research. He noted that the District conducts groundwater quality testing on behalf of Anaheim and other local water providers, performing approximately 400,000 laboratory tests annually to ensure compliance with state and federal drinking water standards while supporting local agencies with water treatment and quality improvement efforts. Mr. Dadakis outlined regional efforts to address PFAS ("forever chemicals") contamination in the groundwater basin. He explained that, after state health advisories were issued, Anaheim proactively shut down affected wells while OCWD partnered with local water agencies to identify cost-effective treatment solutions. He reported that through a cost -sharing agreement, OCWD funds 100% of the capital costs for treatment facilities, while participating cities share future operating costs. He stated that treatment systems have restored 14 Anaheim wells to service, with a third phase of treatment currently in design to address additional wells impacted by new federal PFAS drinking water standards adopted in 2024, which must be met by 2029. He highlighted OCWD's successful litigation against major PFAS manufacturers, noting that settlement funds are being used to offset treatment costs and reduce the financial burden on local ratepayers. Mr. Pacifico explained that California administers and enforces the federal Safe Drinking Water Act under authority delegated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, while also adopting state drinking water standards that are at least as stringent as federal requirements and, in some cases, more protective. He reviewed the development of drinking water regulations, including maximum contaminant levels and treatment requirements, and highlighted the ongoing process for identifying and regulating emerging contaminants. He noted that California is in the process of adopting the new federal PFAS drinking water standards, with monitoring requirements underway and compliance scheduled for 2029. He noted that the federal Safe Drinking Water Act was enacted in 1974, followed by California's Safe Drinking Water Act in 1976, making this year the 50th anniversary of the State law. He explained that these laws establish comprehensive drinking water quality standards and monitoring requirements to protect public health. He described the City's water quality monitoring program, which includes testing at water sources, treatment facilities, and throughout the distribution system. He distinguished between primary drinking water standards that address public health risks, secondary standards related to water quality and consumer acceptability, and monitoring for emerging, unregulated contaminants such as PFAS. He also noted that water quality monitoring includes continuous treatment plant monitoring as well as testing for bacteria, disinfectant byproducts, lead, and copper within the distribution system. Mr. Pacifico outlined additional responsibilities of the California Division of Drinking Water, including coordination with Regional Water Quality Control Boards on wastewater and recycled water programs, administration of funding for water infrastructure improvements, and oversight of accredited laboratories conducting drinking water testing. He noted that compliance testing results City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 38 of 43 are maintained in the Division's public database and that the Santa Ana field office oversees public water systems throughout Orange County by conducting facility inspections and reviewing water quality reports. He outlined the legal responsibilities of public water systems under state regulations, highlighting the comprehensive requirements governing drinking water quality and system operations. Mr. Pacifico concluded the presentation by reviewing current regulations for perchlorate and PFAS. He explained that California's perchlorate drinking water standard is more stringent than the recently proposed federal standard and reported that Anaheim's 2025 water quality testing found perchlorate levels well below the state's maximum contaminant level. He summarized current federal PFAS standards, which become enforceable in 2029, and compared them with California's notification and response levels for emerging contaminants. He explained the purpose of notification levels, response levels, and public health goals, noting that these measures help protect public health while new drinking water standards are developed. General Manager Lee thanked the presentation panel and emphasized the extensive technical, operational, and regulatory efforts required to ensure Anaheim's drinking water meets all safety standards. He highlighted ongoing public outreach efforts, including community meetings, facility tours, educational events, website resources, utility bill inserts, and collaboration with federal agencies to keep residents informed about water quality and environmental issues. He also reported that Anaheim's annual water demand has declined approximately 30% over the past 25 years due to conservation efforts, efficiency improvements, and public education. He stated that despite increasing water treatment costs, staff noted that Anaheim's water rates remain approximately 31 % below the Orange County average, largely due to the City's reliance on the Orange County Groundwater Basin. He emphasized the value of groundwater and recycled water in maintaining a reliable, sustainable, and cost-effective water supply before concluding the presentation and inviting Council questions. DISCUSSION: In response to Mayor Aitken, General Manager Lee confirmed that Anaheim's water is safe to drink. He confirmed that the California standards are more stringent than national standards. Mayor Aitken inquired whether differences in contaminant levels could be attributed to factors such as nearby industrial activity or stormwater runoff. Mr. Dadakis explained that Anaheim's perchlorate levels are consistent with those found in neighboring communities and remain well below California's drinking water standard. He noted that low levels of perchlorate in the groundwater basin are likely attributable to multiple historical sources, including agricultural fertilizer use and industrial applications such as rocket propellants, while emphasizing that current concentrations do not exceed state health standards. Council Member Meeks thanked staff and agency representatives for the presentation and expressed confidence in the quality and safety of Anaheim's drinking water. She highlighted the importance of the Orange County Groundwater Basin, groundwater recharge facilities, and the Groundwater Replenishment System in providing a reliable, sustainable, and cost-effective water supply. She commended Anaheim Public Utilities and the Orange County Water District for their prompt response to PFAS contamination through well shutdowns, treatment system installation, and restoration of groundwater production. She inquired how frequently the City's wells are tested for water quality. Mr. Dadakis explained that groundwater wells are generally tested annually for most regulated contaminants, while some contaminants are monitored every three years, depending on regulatory requirements. He noted that Anaheim Public Utilities conducts additional water quality testing beyond the minimum required standards and deferred to City staff for further details. Assistant General Manager Parker explained that, in addition to required source water monitoring, Anaheim Public Utilities conducts quarterly testing for certain contaminants and continuously monitors City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 39 of 43 treated water produced by its wells. He emphasized that the City complies with all federal and state drinking water testing requirements to ensure the water delivered to customers meets applicable safety standards. In response to Council Member Meeks, Assistant General Manager Parker explained that if testing identifies an increasing trend or an unusual result, additional sampling is conducted to determine whether the finding is an anomaly and to continue monitoring water quality. Council Member Meeks noted that customer complaints are investigated promptly. She thanked staff for their work and expressed appreciation for Anaheim's ability to provide high -quality drinking water at affordable rates. Council Member Balius thanked staff for the presentation and referenced the City's compliance with perchlorate regulations. He inquired ow Anaheim's perchlorate levels compare with those of neighboring water agencies and whether the City is an outlier in terms of perchlorate concentrations. Mr. Dadakis responded that Anaheim's perchlorate levels are consistent with those of neighboring communities, including Garden Grove, Buena Park, and Santa Ana. He stated that Anaheim is not considered an outlier, as perchlorate concentrations are typical for the region and comparable to those found throughout the Orange County groundwater basin. Council Member Balius noted that Anaheim conducts water quality testing both at the groundwater source and after treatment to ensure drinking water safety. He also recognized the Orange County Water District's partnership in identifying effective PFAS treatment technologies and helping manage treatment costs. He asked whether the PFAS treatment systems also improve water quality by addressing other contaminants beyond PFAS. Mr. Dadakis explained that Anaheim's PFAS treatment systems use ion exchange technology, which is designed to remove PFAS from drinking water. He noted that the treatment also provides the added benefit of removing perchlorate, improving overall water quality in wells where both contaminants are present. In response to Council Member Balius, Mr. Dadakis stated that no single industrial source has been identified as the cause of perchlorate detected in the region's groundwater. He explained that available evidence indicates perchlorate likely originates from multiple historical sources, including agricultural fertilizers and industrial propellants, rather than a single point source. Council Member Balius asked how regulatory compliance is handled when federal and California drinking water standards differ, seeking clarification on which requirements govern the City's water quality program. Mr. Pacifico clarified that the State follows the more stringent standards, which are California's. Mayor Pro Tern Leon thanked staff and agency representatives for the presentation, noting that the involvement of multiple regulatory and water agencies provides confidence in the safety of Anaheim's drinking water. He asked what residents should do if they notice discolored water, unusual odors, or other water quality concerns at their home, while acknowledging that such issues could be related to private plumbing or localized conditions rather than the City's water supply. General Manager Lee explained that Anaheim Public Utilities provides free water quality testing for residents, businesses, and schools when concerns arise. He stated that staff would investigate potential causes of issues such as discoloration or odor, identify whether the source is within the City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 40 of 43 customer's plumbing or the City's system, and provide information to help customers address problems on private property, although repairs remain the property owner's responsibility. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Leon, General Manager Lee stated that Anaheim Public Utilities actively informs customers about available water quality resources through social media, the City's website, utility bill inserts, and the annual Water Quality Report. He noted that free water quality testing is available to residents, businesses, and schools, and that the same certified technicians who perform regulatory compliance testing also conduct customer -requested water testing. In response to Mayor Aitken, General Manager Lee explained that Anaheim operates a state -certified laboratory and performs many water quality tests in-house. He noted that for specialized analyses that require equipment or expertise the City does not possess, Anaheim partners with outside laboratories and the Orange County Water District to ensure comprehensive and cost-effective water quality testing. Informational item; no formal action taken by the City Council. Council Member Rubalcava left the meeting at 11:10 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING: 6137.1 31. Public hearing, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, to consider the issuance of certain tax-exempt bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $25,000,000 by the California Municipal Finance Authority for the Hermosa Village Phase III affordable housing project [1217 Lynne Avenue,1309 Lynne Avenue, 1329 Lynne Avenue, 1513 S. Hampstead Street, 1525 S. Hampstead Street,1543 S. Hampstead Street, 1614 S. Hampstead Street, 1619 S. Hampstead Street, 1620 S. Hampstead Street, 1630 S. Hampstead Street, 1624 S. Calle Del Sol, 1630 Calle del Sol, 1607 S. Calle Del Mar, 1613 S. Calle Del Mar, 1220 W. Cerritos Avenue, and 1500 S. Ninth Street] [continued from Council meeting of April 7, 2026, Public Hearing Item No. 151. RESOLUTION NO. 2026-038 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving the issuance of certain California Municipal Finance Authority Exempt Facility Bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $25,000,000 for the purpose of financing or refinancing of the acquisition by ground lease, substantial rehabilitation, improvement, equipping, and operation of Hermosa Village Phase III affordable housing project; and making certain other findings related thereto. Director of Housing and Community Development Grace Ruiz-Stepter reported that the item is a resolution authorizing the California Municipal Finance Authority to issue up to $25 million in tax- exempt conduit bonds to finance the rehabilitation of 112 affordable housing units at Hermosa Village Phase III. She explained that the project is part of a long-term investment strategy in the former Jeffrey -Lynne neighborhood and continues the preservation of the larger Hermosa Village affordable housing community, which contains 521 affordable units within an approximately 700-unit neighborhood, with the remaining units not controlled by the Housing Authority. She provided background on the development, noting that Phase I properties were acquired over approximately a 10-year period beginning around 2000-2003, and that Phases I and II have already been fully rehabilitated and preserved for long-term affordability. She noted that the proposed work represents the next phase of preserving aging affordable housing by rehabilitating Phases III and IV, including 120 units requiring significant capital reinvestment, with the current bond financing supporting Phase City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 41 of 43 III's 112 units. The rehabilitation will preserve affordability for an additional 55 years. She reported that the renovation scope includes complete interior upgrades, such as new kitchens, bathrooms, flooring, and appliances; energy -efficiency improvements; ADA accessibility modifications for selected units; exterior improvements including new paint, landscaping, enhanced security features, and the addition of community exercise equipment. Director Ruiz-Stepter outlined the tenant relocation plan, explaining that construction will require temporary relocation of some residents. She explained that depending on the scope of work, relocations are expected to range from approximately 10 days to as long as 60 days. She stated that residents would receive advance written notices, and a bilingual community meeting has already been held to explain the process. She added that relocation assistance will include stipends for residents who relocate independently, as well as the option of hotel accommodations paid by the property owner or relocation into comparable vacant units within the development, when available. Director Ruiz-Stepter explained that the financing utilizes recycled private activity bond authority available through CMFA, which is not available through City -issued bonds. She reported that the bonds will be repaid solely from project revenues, with no financial obligation to the City or the Housing Authority and no impact on the General Fund. She concluded that the project will preserve affordable housing, improve the safety and livability of aging units, and ensure the long-term sustainability of the property, and recommended approval of the resolution. At 11:24 p.m., Mayor Aitken opened the public hearing. Marc Herbert stated that, despite the City's presentation on water quality and regulatory compliance, they believed it did not address a timeline discrepancy they had previously raised. He expressed concern that the presentation provided only a general overview and did not resolve their specific questions regarding the issue. Mr. Herbert stated that the City's presentation did not address what they described as discrepancies between information provided to the public and state records. He requested greater clarity on unresolved issues and asked that state regulators independently review records related to the City's drinking water sampling and hydrant flushing practices. He emphasized that residents were seeking a review of specific records and timelines rather than a general overview of policies or procedures. Mr. Herbert requested that the City and state provide written directives and field documentation related to hydrant flushing and drinking water sampling, rather than general explanations of water quality procedures. He raised concerns regarding the timing of flushing activities in relation to water sampling and questioned the timeline for Well 51, including when it was taken offline following state notification. He inquired how sampling conditions are verified to reflect actual water conditions experienced by residents and urged the City and state to provide direct responses to these specific concerns to maintain public confidence and transparency. Mayor Aitken reminded Mr. Herbert that the public hearing was related to the Hermosa Village project and requested that Mr. Herbert to direct his comments accordingly. Mr. Herbert explained that residents attending the Hermosa Village community meeting were not informed of concerns related to Well 51, despite the speaker's claim that the City had been notified by the state prior to the meeting. He questioned why the issue was not discussed during the community outreach process and expressed concern about the timing of the well being taken offline. He argued that residents should have been informed and requested the opportunity to complete his remarks explaining the connection to the agenda item. He noted that the project involves a 30-year-old development undergoing improvements to maintain safety standards. He cited the staff report and City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 42 of 43 emphasized that, while the project is intended to preserve safe living conditions, residents should also be assured of the safety of the water provided to the community. No electronic public comments were received related to Public Hearing Item No. 31. At 11:30 p.m., Mayor Aitken closed the public hearing. DISCUSSION: Council Member Kurtz commended staff for their proactive communication with Hermosa Village residents regarding the rehabilitation project. She noted prior concerns about resident outreach due to past issues involving tenant evictions at privately owned properties in the area but stated that recent conversations with residents indicated they were well-informed about the remodeling process. She shared that residents expressed appreciation for staffs outreach efforts, understood what to expect during construction, and were enthusiastic about the planned improvements. She thanked staff, particularly Deputy Director Andy Nogal, for effectively engaging with residents and ensuring clear communication throughout the project. Mayor Pro Tern Leon expressed appreciation for staffs work on the Hermosa Village rehabilitation project and acknowledged the positive feedback regarding resident communication. He requested additional information on the temporary relocation process, noting an earlier impression that residents might need to relocate for an extended period. Director Ruiz-Stepter confirmed that temporary resident relocations will generally last 10 to 60 days, with the longer relocation periods expected to be limited to a small number of units requiring extensive ADA accessibility upgrades. She added that most residents will experience shorter relocation periods for improvements such as new appliances, painting, and other interior renovations. She noted that, having already rehabilitated approximately 400 units, the project team has established an efficient rehabilitation process, and this final phase will complete the modernization of all units within the City's affordable housing portfolio at Hermosa Village. MOTION: Council Member Meeks moved to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2026-038 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM approving the issuance of certain California Municipal Finance Authority Exempt Facility Bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $25,000,000 for the purpose of financing or refinancing of the acquisition by ground lease, substantial rehabilitation, improvement, equipping, and operation of Hermosa Village Phase III affordable housing project; and making certain other findings related thereto, seconded by Council Member Kurtz. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES — 6 (Mayor Aitken and Council Members Leon, Balius, Kurtz, Maahs, and Meeks); NOES — 0; ABSENT — 1 (Council Member Rubalcava). Motion carried. City Council Minutes of April 21, 2026 Page 43 of 43 REPORT ON CLOSED SESSION ACTIONS: City Attorney Robert Fabela stated there was no reportable action for Item No. 1; for Item No. 2, the City Council authorized litigation regarding property located in District 6 [6352 Nohl Ranch Road], and no other reportable action. PUBLIC COMMENTS (non -agenda items : None COUNCIL AGENDA SETTING: None ADJOURNMENT: With no further business before the Council, Mayor Aitken adjourned the City Council in memory of Rebecca Kuhl, Jad T. Davis, and former Anaheim Mayor and Senator John Seymour, at 11:38 p.m. Respectfully submitted, .MC From: Tanya Navarro <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 5:22 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Tanya Navarro Santa Ana, California 92707 From: Ramon Vargas <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 6:50 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Ramon Vargas Santa Ana, California 92701 From: Thomas Hunt -Gibbon <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 7:02 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Thomas Hunt -Gibbon Santa Ana, California 92704 From: Yesenia Juarez <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 8:00 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Yesenia Juarez Tustin, California 92780 From: Christopher Pantoja <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 8:19 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Christopher Pantoja Santa Ana, California 92703 From: andrea briseno <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 8:26 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. andrea briseno anaheim, California 92804 From: Marina Salmon <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 8:28 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Marina Salmon Santa Ana , California 92701 From: Omar Dominguez <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 8:45 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Omar Dominguez Santa Ana, California 92704 From: Veronica Jimenez-fernandez <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 9:11 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Veronica Jimenez-fernandez Orange, California 92868-0000 From: Marlina Balcazar <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 9:31 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Marlina Balcazar Anaheim, California 92801 From: Stephanie Trujillo <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 10:11 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. i hanie Tru*illo South Gate, California 902805 From: Maria Ruvalcaba <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 10:19 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Maria Ruvalcaba Santa Ana, California 92704 From: Melina Arrazola <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 10:25 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Melina Arrazola Santa Ana, California 92703 From: Adnaly Muniz <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 10:25 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Adnaly Muniz Anaheim, California 92805 From: Sabrina Barrot <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 11:50 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Sabrina Barrot Santa Ana, California 92705 From: Marianne Almero <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 3:01 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Marianne Almero Anaheim, California 92806 From: Chris Araujo < noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 6:40 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Chris Araujo Santa Ana, California 92701 From: Crystal Ordonez <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 7:01 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Crystal Ordonez Santa Ana , California 92701 From: Grant Kobayashi <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 9:55 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Grant Kobayashi Orange, California 92865 From: Ashlee Pineda <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 10:09 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Ashlee Pineda Tustin, California 92780 From: Karen Hernandez <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 10:13 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Karen Hernandez Anaheim, California 92805 From: Shanna Somers <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:02 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Shanna Somers Tustin, California 92780 From: Katherine Roark -Schwartz <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:04 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Katherine Roark -Schwartz Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688 From: Stephanie Hopkins <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:08 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Stephanie Hopkins Anaheim, California 92808 From: <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:08 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. From: Alexander Rudenshiold <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:09 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Alexander Rudenshiold Irvine, California 92617 From: Haley Horton Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:13 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Automated surveillance systems - consent calendar item 7 [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim city council and city staff, Please be aware that the surveillance systems being out in by city's with Flock or with ALPR are not secure, violate our rights, and will be used by bad actors like ICE to hunt down Californians. Do not violate our rights to "prevent crime" because the crime will already have been committed against all of us, and we have not voted to give up our rights this way. What Anaheim does affects all the OC because of the businesses and entertainment located in the city. Please do not continue down an expensive and mistaken path of illegal surveillance. Thank you, Haley Horton From: Natalie Ochoa < noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:27 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Natalie Ochoa Anaheim, California 92801 From: Katie Dillard Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:28 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Please read allowed -Public Comment: Vote no on adding cameras and surveillance in OC You don't often get email from Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I am writing today because I have been made aware that it it sthe intention of the Anaheim City Council to vote on adding 72 ALPR cameras (Flock -style) to your survillance network in the city and throughout Orange County. I vehemently say that the community does not want these cameras and ask you to vote no on this addition. These cameras and the networks that support them are not secure and create more safety and liability issues for the community and you as a council than any benefit they may have for survelliance. The face validity of their use isn't even there as just having videos doesn't improve public safety. Please use any additional funds for safety services to increase services to people living in poverty or enhancing community safety patrols focused on watch dogging aggressive use of force inappropriately by current safety workers. Use any funding saved to provdie enhanced training to current safety staff around mental health deescalation or community focused relationship and engagement support. Anything that is evidence based and science backed for actually creating increased safety in our OC community but not increased camera survelliance that's only benefit is to line the pockets of the system developers, further remove hyperlocal safety efforts AND decrease support from real, trained human beings needed in our community. thank you, concerned oc resident From: Bulmaro Vicente <boomer@chispaoc.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:29 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Public Comment Item 7 - Motorola Automated License Plate Reader Attachments: 4.21.26 Chispa Item 7 - Letter of Opposition.pdf Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hi, Please find Chispa's letter of opposition for Item 7 In Solidarity, Boomer Policy and Political Director I Chispa e: boomerPchispaoc.org c: 1505 E 17th Street Suite 117 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Chispa is building a political home for young Latinxs in Orange County! Please consider making a donation to help us build our casita. Chispa is a project of Tides Advocacy, a 501c4 non-profit organization. Chispa � C fiispa April 21, 2026 Mayor Ashleigh Aitken and Members of City Council City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Item 7 - Opposition to Motorola Automated License Plate Reader Dear Mayor Aitkens and Members of the Anaheim City Council, On behalf of Chispa, we write to express our strong opposition to Item #07, which proposes expanding the City of Anaheim's (City) Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) program through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well -documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. Anaheim has experienced large-scale immigration enforcement actions over the past year, where we have seen ICE abduct members of our community. We appreciate the City's efforts to support residents through initiatives such as the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo. However, expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Investing in surveillance technology not only sends the wrong message to residents, particularly immigrant communities, who are already vulnerable but it is at odds with the City's values. At a time when immigrant communities are facing heightened fear due to increased enforcement activity, this item risks deepening harm,eroding trust between residents and local government, and being used as a tool by outside agencies like ICE. We urge the City Council to reject Item #07 and instead prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents. Best,, 44W&gt'- Bulmaro Vicente, Policy and Political Director ' Khari Johnson and Mohamed Al Elew, "California Police Are Illegally Sharing License Plate Reader Data with ICE and Border Patrol," CalMatters, June 13, 2025, hUs://calmatters.ora/economy/technology/2025/06/califomia-police-sharing-license-plate-reader-data/ (accessed April 21, 2026) From: Haley Horton <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:41 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing because what happens at Anaheim:affects all of OC simply because of the world famous venues located in Anaheim. I strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Haley Horton Costa Mesa, California 92627 From: Karla Navarro <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:41 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Karla Navarro Santa Ana , California 92707 From: Ernesto Gutierrez <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:43 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Ernesto Gutierrez Anaheim, California 92805 From: Andrea Diaz <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:46 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Andrea Diaz Santa Ana, California 92706 From: Katherine Derrington <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:54 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Katherine Derrington Laguna Niguel, California 92677 From: Lauren Fisher <info@mylagunaoffice.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:58 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion You don't often get email from info@mylagunaoffice.com. Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Lauren Fisher info@mylagunaoffice.com Laguna Beach, California 92651 From: Katherine Derrington - Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:58 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Prioritize Safe Streets without Surveillance [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Thank you for your consideration, Katherine Derrington From: Ellisse Garcia <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 12:06 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Ellisse Garcia Placentia, California 92870 From: Yesenia Altamirano < noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 12:19 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Yesenia Altamirano Anaheim, California 92805 From: Kristi Hetchler <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 12:22 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Kristi Hetchler Laguna Niguel, California 92677 From: Fatima Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 12:24 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Consent calendar item #7 You don't often get email from Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. My name is Fatima and I write here as an OC resident urging the council to oppose consent calendar item #7. Across California, police have illegally shared license plate data with ICE and Border Patrol, therefore implementing ALPRs puts much of the Anaheim community at risk. This automated ticketing also furthers stark racial disparities in criminalizing low-income Latino, Black, and immigrant communities, as shown by ProPublica's Chicago case studies. We can and should prioritize safer streets without increasing surveillance --for example, this could look like implementing speed bumps, rethinking urban planning, and increasing availability of public transportation. From: < noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 12:31 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. From: Mia Verdin < noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 12:31 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Mia Verdin Santa Ana, California 92705 From: Felicity Figueroa <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 12:42 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Felicity Figueroa Irvine, California 92604-3003 From: Perla Gonzales <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 12:51 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Perla Gonzales Santa Ana, California 92703 From: Rachel Dinah <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 1:09 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Rachel Dinah Santa Ana, California 92701 From: Rebecca Pasillas <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 1:18 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Rebecca Pasillas Santa Ana, California 92701 From: Donna Malamud <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 1:28 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Donna Malamud Venice, California 90291 From: Jay C < noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 1:43 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Jay C Lk Forest , California 92630 From: Grace Suh <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 2:16 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Grace Suh Irvine, California 92602 From: Susan Burgess <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 2:19 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Susan Burgess Tustin, California 92780 From: Natalie Camarena Lopez <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 2:21 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Natalie Camarena Lopez Santa Ana, California 92704 From: Ivon Pena <iPena @occord.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 2:30 PM To: Public Comment Cc: Angeles Ochoa Carmona; Gustavo Castillo Subject: [EXTERNAL] Opposition Letter for Item 7 — Motorola Automated License Plate Reader Attachments: 4.21.26 OCCORD Item 7 - Letter of Opposition.pdf You don't often get email from ipena@occord.org. Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Anaheim City Council, Please see attached OCCORD's letter of opposition regarding Item 7, the Motorola Automated License Plate Reader item. Thank you foryour time and consideration. In Solidarity, Ivon Non Pena OCCO R D BUILDING COMMUNITY POWER Executive Director 0 ipena()occord.org u https://www.occord.org/ 0 1505 E 17th St. Suite 122, Santa Ana, CA 92705 1 OCCO R D _. BUILDING COMMUNITY POWER April 21, 2026 Mayor Ashleigh Aitken and Members of City Council City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Item 7 - Opposition to Motorola Automated License Plate Reader Dear Mayor Aitkens and Members of the Anaheim City Council, On behalf of Orange County Communities Organized for Responsible Development (OCCORD), we write to express our strong opposition to Item #07, which proposes expanding the City of Anaheim's (City) Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) program through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well -documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country.' Anaheim has experienced large-scale immigration enforcement actions over the past year, where we have seen ICE abduct members of our community. We appreciate the City's efforts to support residents through initiatives such as the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo. However, expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Investing in surveillance technology not only sends the wrong message to residents, particularly immigrant communities, who are already vulnerable but it is at odds with the City's values. At a time when immigrant communities are facing heightened fear due to increased enforcement activity, this item risks deepening harm,eroding trust between residents and local government, and being used as a tool by outside agencies like ICE. We urge the City Council to reject Item #07 and instead prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents. Best, Ivon Pena, Executive Director ' Khari Johnson and Mohamed Al Elew, "California Police Are Illegally Sharing License Plate Reader Data with ICE and Border Patrol," CalMatters, June 13, 2025, hit s://calmatters.org/economy/technology/2025/06/califomia-po]ice-sharing-license-plate-reader-data/ (accessed April 21, 2026). From: betsy Lobos <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 2:42 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. betsy Lobos Santa Ana, California 92706 From: Evelyn Garcia <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 2:48 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Evelyn Garcia Anaheim , California 92801 From: Adrian Stephen <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 2:58 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Adrian Stephen Anaheim, California 92805 From: <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 3:21 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject ALPR (Automated License Plate Reader) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. From: < noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 3:24 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. From: Karen G. Hernandez <karen@ocrapidresponse.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 3:33 PM To: Public Comment Cc: tanya@chispaoc.org; boomer@chispaoc.org; Kelsey Gordon; Sandra De Anda; Subject: [EXTERNAL] April 21 - Anaheim Public Comment - Agenda Item #7 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed You don't often get email from karen@ocrapidresponse.org. Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Mayor and Council Members, My name is Karen Hernandez, Managing Director of OC Rapid Response Network, and an Anaheim resident in District 4. 1 am writing to express my STRONG opposition to Agenda Item 7 on the consent calendar, which would authorize over $736,000 to expand Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) surveillance in Anaheim and across the region. This proposal would significantly expand Anaheim's ALPR program by adding 72 new cameras, deepening the City's integration into a dangerous and controversial regional data -sharing network across Orange County. This is not a small upgrade; it is a major expansion of surveillance infrastructure. ALPR systems collect data on every vehicle that passes by, not just those connected to crimes. Research shows that over 99% of this data is unrelated to any criminal investigation, meaning the system primarily tracks ordinary residents without suspicion or consent. This expansion raises serious concerns about privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR systems are designed to share data across jurisdictions, and that data does not stay local. Across California, law enforcement agencies have already shared ALPR data with federal immigration authorities, including ICE, in violation of state law, including documented cases here in Southern California. That means this is not just about local policing —it is about building infrastructure that can and has been illegally used for immigration enforcement. Even if that is not the City's intent, these systems rely on third -party vendors and regional platforms that enable broad access. Once this data is collected, the City cannot fully control how it is used or who ultimately accesses it. Expanding this system increases the risk of misuse and undermines public trust —especially at a time when Anaheim has taken important steps to support immigrant communities through efforts like the Contigo Fund. For many residents, this is not theoretical. Surveillance changes behavior. People avoid work, school, healthcare, and places of worship when they believe their movements are being tracked. That makes this not just a privacy issue, but a public safety issue. Time and again, in the community work OCRRN engages in, we see the real impact of harmful policies like surveillance layered on top of the daily attacks immigrant communities already face. Families are navigating fear not just from federal enforcement, but from systems that quietly track their movements and create uncertainty about who may have access to their information. These technologies don't exist in a vacuum —they deepen mistrust, discourage people from accessing essential services, and make it harder for communities to feel safe in their own neighborhoods. This expansion will not meaningfully improve safety —it will only expand monitoring, and those are not the same. While the proposal relies in part on grants and donations, it still commits the City to long-term costs and deeper dependence on surveillance technology. Anaheim MUST reject this expansion and instead invest in community -based safety strategies that build trust and protect the rights and dignity of all residents, especially those most vulnerable to illegal ICE enforcement actions. At a minimum, the City should require: • Explicit prohibitions on sharing ALPR data with federal immigration enforcement • Strict limits on data retention and access • Independent audits and public reporting • Meaningful community input before expanding surveillance systems Until these protections are in place, approving this item is premature. For these reasons, I urge you to vote no on Agenda Item 7. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Karen Hernandez References: • https://reason.com/2026/04/16/san-loses-creepy-and-deeply-intrusive-alpr-camera-system-is- unconstitutional-a-new-lawsuit-says/ • https://caImatters.orq/economv/technology/2025/06/caIifornia-police-sharing-license-plate- reader-data/ • https://www.eff.orq/deeplinks/2019/03/heres-why-you-cant-trust-what-cops-and-companies- claim-about-automated-license • https://www.aclunorcal.org/news/alameda-rejects-surveillance-deal-company-tied-ice/ • https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/11/how-cops-are-using-flock-safetys-alpr-network-surveil- protesters-and-activists • https://pasadenanow.com/main/residents-raise-privacy-equity-concerns-over-police-use-of- flock-cameras ..,.� Karen G. Hernandez Pronouns: (She/Ella) �i Managing Director Orange County Rapid Response Network www.ocrapidresponse.org Email: karen@ocraPidresPonse.= THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. IF THE READER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR THE EMPLOYEE OR AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THE MESSAGE TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBUTION OR COPYING OF THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. From: Erin Moncure <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 3:50 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Erin Moncure Lake Forest, California 92630-5234 From: Angeles Ochoa Carmona <aochoa@occord.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 4:05 PM To: Public Comment Cc: Ivon Pena; Gustavo Castillo Subject: [EXTERNAL] Opposition Letter for Item 7 — Motorola Automated License Plate Reader Attachments: Opposition Letter for Item 7 — Motorola Automated License Plate Reader.pdf Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Hello, Please see my attached public comment on Item 7 for today's council meeting. Thank you. Best, Angeles Ochoa Carmona Digital Organizer laOCCORD BUILDING COMMUNITY POWER 05 aochoaCq)occord.org www.occord.org Fq 1505 E 17th St, Suite 122, Santa Ana, CA 92705 1 Re: Item 7 - Opposition to Motorola Automated License Plate Reader Dear Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, My name is Angeles Ochoa and I am the Digital Organizer with Orange County Communities Organized for Responsible Development (OCCORD). I am writing to express my opposition to Item #7, which proposes expanding the City's Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) program through the purchase of 72 additional cameras. I want to acknowledge that public safety is important to all of us. However, expanding surveillance is not the solution. This proposal would significantly increase the monitoring of residents across Anaheim without adequately addressing the serious risks it brings to privacy, civil liberties, and community trust. ALPR systems are not just cameras —they are data collection tools. They track where people go, store that information and often share it across agencies and jurisdictions. Even when there are policies in place, there are well -documented concerns about how this data can be accessed indirectly by federal agencies, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), through third -party vendors and data -sharing systems. This is especially concerning given the real experiences of immigrant families in Anaheim. Over the past year, our community has witnessed increased immigration enforcement actions that have caused fear and harm. Expanding surveillance infrastructure in this context does not make people feel safer, instead it makes them feel watched and vulnerable. The City has taken steps to support immigrant communities through efforts like the Anaheim Contigo program and the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund. However, expanding ALPR technology undermines those efforts by creating conditions that can put the same communities at greater risk and erode trust in local government. Public safety should be rooted in trust, transparency and community investment, not expanded surveillance. There are alternative, community -based approaches that prioritize safety while respecting the dignity and rights of all residents. For these reasons, I urge the City Council to reject Item #7 and instead invest in solutions that truly strengthen and protect our community. Thank you for your time and consideration. Best, Angeles Ochoa Digital Organizer From: Carlos A <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 4:24 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Carlos A Anaheim, California 92804 From: Karla Ortiz <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 7:20 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Karla Ortiz Anaheim, California 92805 From: Elizabeth Zuniga <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 7:38 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am a resident of Anaheim who is writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Elizabeth Zuniga , CA From: Catherine Goldenberg <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 7:45 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] No to Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Thank you for your time and consideration, C.G. Catherine Goldenberg Tustin, California 92782 From: Todd Goldenberg <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 7:45 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Todd Goldenberg Tustin, California 92782 From: Reina Marchi <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 8:03 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Reina Marchi Anaheim, California 92801 From: daniella brooks <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 8:27 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. daniella brooks Santa Fe Springs, California 90670 From: daniella brooks <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 8:28 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. daniella brooks Santa Fe Springs, California 90670 From: Andrea Sosa <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 8:39 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Andrea Sosa Santa Ana, California 92707 From: Karyn Philhower <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 8:44 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Karyn Philhower Orange, California 92869 From: Genesis Luviano <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 8:46 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Genesis Luviano Santa Ana, California 92707 From: Dalia Zidan <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 8:58 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Dalia Zidan Anaheim, California 92808 From: Janielle Rollins <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 9:08 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Janielle Rollins Irvine, California 92604 From: Christopher Pham <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 9:09 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Christopher Pham Anaheim, California 92807 From: Elizabeth Wiest <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 9:12 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Elizabeth Wiest Orange, California 92865 From: Jose Lopez <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 9:51 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Jose Lopez Anaheim , California 92805 From: Victoria Kim <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 9:57 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Victoria Kim Irvine, California 92602 From: Leana de Leon <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 10:25 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Leana de Leon Westminster, California 92685 From: Emanuel Lucas <noreply@adv.actionnetwork.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 10:52 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Reject Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) Expansion Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim City Council Anaheim City Council, To: Mayor Aitken and the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to strongly oppose Item 07, the proposed expansion of the City of Anaheim's proposed Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) through the purchase of 72 additional cameras from Motorola Solutions. I do not support taxpayer dollars being used in this way. This proposal represents a significant expansion of surveillance across the City and County of Orange. ALPR systems raise serious concerns over the violation of privacy, civil liberties, and the safety of immigrant communities. ALPR technology has historically enabled data sharing across jurisdictions, creating pathways for access by federal agencies such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Even when cities do not intend to share information directly with ICE, the use of third -party vendors and regional data -sharing platforms introduces real and well - documented risks of indirect access and has led to unintended access by outside agencies in municipalities across the State of California and Country. I applaud the City's efforts to support residents that have been impacted by immigration enforcement actions. I support the Anaheim Legal Defense Fund and Anaheim Contigo programs. Expanding surveillance infrastructure like this undermines and contradicts the spirit of those efforts as ALPR technology puts the City's immigrant families at greater risk. Anaheim residents deserve real support. I urge the City Council to prioritize community -based approaches to public safety that respect the rights, dignity, and safety of all residents - reject Item #07 and vote NO on expanding Automated License Plate Readers in the City. Emanuel Lucas Anaheim, California 92802 From: James Campbell dames@TheDiamondGroup.net> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 2:22 PM To: Ashleigh Aitken <AAitken@anaheim.net>; Natalie Meeks <NMeeks@anaheim.net>; Carlos A. Leon <CLeon@anaheim.net>; Ryan Balius <RBalius@anaheim.net>; Natalie Rubalcava <NRubalcava@anaheim.net>; Norma C. Kurtz <NKurtz@anaheim.net>; Kristen Maahs <KMaahs@anaheim.net>; Berenice Ballinas <BBallinas@anaheim.net>; Magnolia Moreno <MMorenol@anaheim.net>; Ryan Carey <RCarev@anaheim.net>; City Manager <Citymanager@anaheim.net>; Ted White <TedWhite@anaheim.net> Cc: Ray Baker <rbaker@lamar.com>; Hal Kilshaw <hkilshaw@lamar.com>; Roger Faubel <Roger@faubelpa.com>; Kent Saunders <ksaunders@lamar.com> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Relative to Item 29 on tonight's agenda... You don't often get email from lames@thediamondgroup.net. Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Good afternoon. Please see the email below and attached revised proposal from Lamar Outdoor Advertising related to the November, 2024 proposal to the City. We appreciate your leadership and general discussion on this issue and are available going forward to discuss specifics relative to this agenda item and Lamar's proposal. Best, James Campbell Subject: Revised Anaheim Public -Private Partnership Proposal — Lamar Advertising Mayor Aitken and Members of the City Council, Please find attached Lamar Advertising's revised Public -Private Partnership proposal, building upon our original submission from November 2024. IlThis updated proposal outlines a comprehensive approach to modernizing Anaheim's outdoor advertising environment through a strategic combination of public and private locations, along with the removal of select surface street signage. The program is designed to leverage advanced digital technology to enhance the City's visual landscape while delivering meaningful public benefits. Through this initiative, Anaheim has the opportunity to implement a forward -thinking program that: Generates significant, long-term revenue for the City (approximately $63,750,000 over the initial 30-year term, with the potential to reach $85,000,000 over the full term including the mutual extension) Enhances communication capabilities for public safety, emergency alerts, and civic messaging Supports local economic development, including a 25% rate card discount for Anaheim - based businesses Improves overall aesthetics by transitioning from legacy signage to modern, high -quality digital displays Removes 34 existing surface street billboard faces, representing a meaningful private investment by Lamar to reduce legacy signage and enhance the City's visual environment in exchange for this modernization program Beyond the financial impact, this proposal reflects a continued commitment to partnership with the City of Anaheim —delivering both immediate and long-term value while aligning with the City's broader goals for economic development, public engagement, and visual improvement. We appreciate your time and consideration and would welcome the opportunity to discuss this revised proposal in greater detail at your convenience. Respectfully, Ray Baker Ray Baker / Vice -President & General Manager Lamar Advertising of Los Angeles/Orange County O: 323.933.3222 / 1121 S. Boyle Ave, Ste. 201, Los Angeles, CA 90023 lamar.com/losanaeles CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This electronic message may contain confidential or legally privileged information from Lamar Advertising Company. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us immediately by telephone at (323) 933-3222 or by email and delete this message uncopied. YqL Aor IL x ; � «. g§ « . � :�.� � :�. �� •» . ) � _ e Cit ofAnahei*m Digital Billboard Proposal Lamar of Los AngelesiOrange County April 20, 2026 Q ANAHEIM - OVERVIEW MAP CITY OF ANAHEIM - ALL INVENTORY - OCTOBER 2024 W Malvern Ave Alta Vista St inaa dlra' Artesia Ave E Chapman Ave x W Commonwealth Ave Fullerton ECommomv RhAve Placentia A E Crowther Ave BU Park W Valencia Or € W Valergia or � e A e INJ4,.. P. ATWOOD � Eprao9 � Orengethorpe Ave E Orang ?Ihmpe Ave r apara ' .ePalma a' -� g ert+.w • -. J 1j1Y,.F E Romneye Or e < aayar YiW �e 14Ba1ma Ave x r ,,. 3 3IL Crescent Ave Anaheim fS10 Y nebl aJ'n`� lam, Ana $t al ^ Lmcotn Ave t an A �ffl I II 6 ,ve va Lincolna 1 e .. '` ESa nta #" w p a ES.,t+� OrargeA 2 T � ed R� Ball Rd �•.. J - ..„ ' �u Bell Rd mad ad IYf FA� a i5 vF L. Taft Ave rer_ tyc.-I�u HER MOSA Villa Park em W Ctos Ave pJv 1 W Cerntos Ave VILLAGE ,,,,- L i a,.,� .I W Ka1Hla Ave SOUTHWEST ANAMEIM y n Katella Ave Stanton Katella Ave W Karelia Ave u ' CONVENTION RUSTIC LANE CENTER 'R '� Orangewood Ave = 'M lid'r xfa 5IA11I1 �� p - Walnut Ave EWalnut Ave y 3 Chapman Ave Chapman Ave Chapman Ave y RESORIT Orange .�+. OLD TOWNE :ST GARDEN e Lampson Ave GROVE Lamps.. Ave. Lamps- Ave J E la Veta Ave m x ,.. .0 Garden Grove Fairhaven Ave aym WEST FLORAL PARK ppRK SANTIAGO E Santa Clara Ave ^ a„ cnua 0eor ,yi. ea _,Mapdala®2024000gle Repwtamape•rar LAMARi I LOSANIGELES I 313911"" I tr"/n{ORU1gep1MON 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company 11 LosAngeles- Anaheim 2 ANAHEIM - WEST ZOOM VIEW OTY OF ANAHEIM , ALL I NVEN TORY - OCTOBER 2024 a FoRcir L THIS] L L Lo JL orc%r 0APPOLVA MINE iUAND AMiNeIN h r..�.aa Mtn w a 11-1 VAL& ro r 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company 11 Los Angeles- Anaheim 3 AN HEIM - EAST ZOOM VIEW C'TY OF X�AHEIM - ALL IPdVENT RY - OCTOBER ?a A H w k ck r r. eM -A- 7' PtKff" IL 9�Ja C dA OR '+* i4'ILwk'LT L�l _toe i I LMo'p' i, WAni IPI. r na'helm ..w v�+�tisary.' All k WLLw { m t .lit wwA kLw� �,. •� ` yh�-ir � . �, .... �� AYYYSEIY '4♦ l w i4 IN �. �1■I�eL.+.M �.ryCy .y .... if,ay ll! _ S l � � ":ra4C" it ". • Ji+ 6M°Wsi AYIY •:� i.• L. l A�JY i'r ne. �f a 1 1aMxkwRN 1 144NUM I 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company 11 LosAngeles- Anaheim 4 City of Anaheim - InventorY Analysis dJlirl I - 3G �F %1 Ma5 !.vl ram t*y 4v tir 1` s�.:,.:,,u�a +VMcic �,_.. rka AA.', I.nw EJ.,ka Ld �- _�".h ¢' Ir a II'k 777 f 4L.E 51 4ti'L I• :� ALL L Ma �°o-'.Ir r LW' r I I 7'OG IT cP*cP'a ; 5t'1, nw n c] iNoA mm wt J•Ynar �'Ft•� am y North V Ir a I +• Ir � two 2e95 +CFFEFISOM ST'.%1 Nor N OF UIR►;Ouk SF 1aAY.04 Aay4 w Iflasw f So.* I}' fy . 12 W 11.1 3.] c Ntnrh'r II_AJ l%DrsAiI Fill 110ERT(L+LF504IMLLP'ISF ftrakwj an rra tar4.]4F0nna flaS{{ 'a+iLlQda L"C'a I., II. VT4 . LTIV h,I kr� 'W104 . l2AE4 ? ', .619 13 11.22 �+II. Eld SL. ]i5f"I tu+:, L61.IIr iT dl '0L(SrrAh O` E EL y yr; 5 or LIIKCMN.%A w lerloN f'anlsa �LralNa s17 -.rt w PhM4ia fi4 tsw NMh �" IS'" I L�° fr V cr . I7' IP M7 KO 112J401 SZMA 13 'r 4.n .. L{+ T+1 'hL3, Cll4h �AS.t LL '_ WI S 01 LI!MUN ohl � , _. L 41�r `'A EL LWF 4 OF ORL4EE AwyA� P1f Jrrra, ftu*. 1` [],mul: .�._._...._ .. _._.-.._. JaR4'Af Fxr4Lt° Elas4;c WTI) i° IJ` a 12, W . ... V T 4 L2' 4' h,r 0 lIi am .. _. .. 1%0 9ili1S 4I �"413 lL4t71" VA dt kbCi 4 {II dri%4Lr NAM M ti144r.. Y, 4.A S.I F� Y 0 r rLlh lw Ii „ [ SL 5 . � ST EF jwMM Itrljs. + tin WL ..._., . 62 9 I#!t? 7 t1 1 1Y71 Llhl soh" fL ]AII c5^ Uf I14a L. W-1I NA Ss YWF h&& P&Lbw it,I.. mt 54n1 V r a 0, it No 1IML _,.�.. ;Ssmi L4 I A.^acUID11 Is: EL :a` F i LJI La. LI.: iJ?sa'er hI i�laYl palam iusuL =, b.._._., n b' Er' I LTIr NO 9kP&M LS SL EL 33qF S OF Ls wd,° aAeL.A'aE SF )Wt' 4 P&LW I 02: LK SQOa V Ir s L2' lr 40 11L*tNS Lt lei, I LIFTt'%k% W hL IM 5fW OF STATE COIL k EF hRION F&Fw JUNW ChI S' Ira L2' Ei NO KM L7 1977 1,11v1 '1, A he rF'd1,' IY STATE COLL 14'W J o*d ft4w I fjMI4c 'W;l1 41 G" b L7' (r Oro M.05 L9 iiTE#, tip.§rE�h •`aF dei, ! itr S {Sa LryCC4lh '4F Id Lw44or ,F i7 MSk w-w h V Ir a IT cr kd� -�} LS 2w? yd,2rLkh keE s4L L45f 5 V LI4117XPrNA SF xfIw Po4w I Ejmk So— T4' W 4 L2' 4'° 40 >lAhs 24 Mill EkFp,,sn+W-Y}I,gQFEC#M+ NijFate'5r(F f—+ w K4wf4J MPc V t— V4"aL2'kr ko STWA 17 7229 ■W¢5i s4Ai Si 'Y�F II eIr hafi I NJ Ii$F S'r SIVI &1*ff" fu1ja 141"uS 4+eci 4.' Iry I7' Q' w w 7 2 2& wmm mky %I a,IZs [ n, hJ IlLL ANT 1? hn141 Ann [IRSNk 14M V Er- a 17, n' No WMM .7y M? HIMA114'sW 51 1121 E 01 0.{NYlrFbA L *A WF hirwrtVWW CLIP4k W", V Ir a I',' ®' NIP Af�JNGI # soaa ILAI. F [I MN 14'00 W {,I .,LILlAi SI Mn hash 4' um ICIMUC Viwl a.` Ir I I!' a, 111110 Ia]MM 2% lL SM% 401ii Hatil t kNI MI 14 - W {U G059Ai Si Lr N. LNI Nr %I YaL SA°II 4 $f AALt MR Sr JarMK fuLb rtcl R LA,Id $Da ft ,Alcor%k.... a i' 11? u, #. �" I.1 '.N� h.o �..Ah{Ny WAN 4k &M 3Jr A SN:IaP I[l+ 30 L.•LNI Kr %I AI ]ill 4 .i.N4LL Ilf NO I'LAI i IC 6t ML I,w a fit dl.%I I tMA 6I'IFI3 ILL tarao #otlru e4=Lw as V IrI I>.. D. ]Cr & a i it h�J hu i i0a !dw rLM 1 Lalk1 LStl M JA333 F]tl . NG ML 1.'Sd E 00 S Nil °�' 1'tI.I. kYb Wf dAl'- re L1 } ].a` E 124E DAU MfE EF lLift& dudem 7 dailiLlfl l Mrd C Wl ]d IY a r Ir 31Y $' 17' IY' MU TES gym 11MM 30 i*i-S I i0734 6AI PD S': 3LI f W L'AI I if Wf AnIftr dai31llh f we-rt 31713" 17' 0' *FS &w" 32 i41" IY41.1 AD S, �3 Y. Clt 0001N:1N.NMTST IF iuf & duMi Wi f LAW C'M Ice (Y a 7' cr hQ 31 1 i1395A dili RD 53 343' Y C?F MOON -JR5e ST WT 14M'41ra+ MAMA f F4r 'Aw 4fi4.4t ID 01 I PC' hO MKW 34 10452 IMAGPAM.LL AW Et 3 33' Sii F ;wn1° *lF Wkw dLdkd4% t RP• '.40F Nar'Ih I U T 4 7' Ir No 42"A 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company 11 LosAngeles- Anaheim !1:m JIN I r x ..a d •Pt �� •TM� �`tr .. ""die• '+ - �. +-�: ..a r: ._ •i !fir ' _ , ' r ,. � � � ,. rMi¢. � ,gip • �� e•. _, f,, vn � � _ ��• a -� �•� � � w a �� g � � Company Indentification and Experience Lamar Advertising Company Attn: Ray Baker, Vice President/General Manager 1121 S. Boyle Ave, Suite 201 Los Angeles, CA 90023 323-933-3222 The main contact at Lamar who will handle the negotiations of the Agreement will be Ray Baker. Below is a list of projects that outline Lamar's experience in developing large projects and the track record of superior design. Similar Projects Lamar's Southern California Division has a well -established track record of working with local public agencies to develop, construct, and maintain digital displays. For every project, the Lamar team has partnered with the agency to address regulatory issues, community concerns, and aspects of development that serve to maximize the benefits of the project for the agency, community, and local businesses. The regulatory environment for sign development involves multiple agencies and can be complex. Lamar has developed substantial expertise in this area working with public agencies to effectively navigate this process in the most efficient manner possible. For all projects involving freeways, Lamar has obtained the necessary approvals from State of California departments involved in freeway landscape classification, legal, and business issues associated with sign permitting. On a local level, Lamar has assisted agencies with making modifications to existing sign ordinances and effecting zone changes as appropriate. Lamar's extensive development experience and approach to developing symbiotic relationships with its partnering agencies ensures that agencies obtain maximum financial benefit while maintaining the highest quality and community character. Lamar collaborates with agencies in areas that include providing revenue generation through up -front financial benefits and ensuring long-term property rental income. In addition to the financial benefits, Lamar works to improve community aesthetics by removing and upgrading older signs, assisting with outreach in addressing concerns from the community, providing opportunities for public-service announcements and developing opportunities for promotion of local businesses. The following is a list of successful relevant projects completed by the team at Lamar Southern California: 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company 11 LosAngeles- Anaheim 7 Similar Project Number 1: Fullerton, CA Lamar operates a back-to-back LED digital display along the 91 Freeway in the City of Fullerton. Lamar successfully partnered with the city through a development agreement that allows for the operation of the digital display while providing revenue participation to the city. The agreement also includes provisions for public messaging, including the promotion of city initiatives and emergency alert capabilities. As part of the project, Lamar worked collaboratively with the city to align on development standards and ensure compatibility with local planning objectives. As with all projects, Lamar obtained all necessary California Department of Transportation approvals in addition to local entitlements. Similar Project Number 2: Lynwood, CA Lamar operates a digital billboard along the 710 Freeway, just north of the 105 Freeway interchange, in the City of Lynwood. Lamar partnered with the city through a development agreement that allows for the operation of the digital display while providing revenue participation to the city. The agreement also includes provisions for public messaging, including the promotion of city initiatives and emergency alert capabilities. As part of the project, Lamar removed 26 static billboard faces within the city, supporting local objectives to reduce legacy signage and improve overall corridor aesthetics. Lamar worked collaboratively with the city to align on development standards and ensure compatibility with local planning goals. As with all projects, Lamar obtained all necessary California Department of Transportation approvals in addition to local entitlements. 2026 II Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company 11 LosAngeles- Anaheim 8 Similar Project Number 3: Long Beaeh, CA Lamar operates two digital billboard locations in the City of Long Beach —one along the 405 Freeway near the airport and another along the 91 Freeway. Lamar partnered with the city through a development agreement that allows for the operation of these digital displays, including provisions for public messaging such as the promotion of city initiatives and emergency alert capabilities. As part of the project, Lamar removed a significant number of existing static billboard faces within the city, supporting Long Beach's objectives to reduce legacy signage and enhance overall corridor aesthetics. While this agreement does not include direct revenue participation for the city, it provides substantial public benefit through sign reduction, improved visual environment, and ongoing public communication capabilities. As with all projects, Lamar obtained all necessary California Department of Transportation approvals in addition to local entitlements. �° IIIIIIII iuiiu.tu.tu.tu�tu�h IIII IIIIIIII Illlllllllllllllu .,_ .� 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company 11 LosAngeles- Anaheim 8 Similar Project Number 4: Placentia, CA Lamar operates multiple LED digital billboard faces along the 57 Freeway, just north of the 91 Freeway, in the City of Placentia. Placentia was Lamar's first city partner in this program and remains a valued legacy partner. Lamar partnered with the city through a development agreement that allows for the operation of these digital displays while providing revenue participation to the city. The agreement also includes provisions for public messaging, and the City of Placentia has been highly engaged in utilizing this platform to promote community initiatives and emergency alert communications. Lamar currently operates six digital faces at this location and has received approval for a fourth and final location along the 91 Freeway. The final site is fully entitled, and Lamar is currently awaiting permit issuance from California Department of Transportation to proceed with construction. As with all projects, Lamar has worked closely with the city to ensure alignment with local planning objectives and compliance with all regulatory requirements. 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company II LosAngeles- Anaheim 10 Similar Project Number 5: El Monte, CA Lamar has secured entitlements for an LED digital billboard along the 10 Freeway in the City of El Monte, one of the latest cities in the Los Angeles area to participate in this program. Lamar partnered with the city through a development agreement that allows for the operation of the digital display while providing revenue participation to the city. The agreement also includes provisions for public messaging, including the promotion of city initiatives and emergency alert capabilities. As part of the project, Lamar removed one existing static billboard within the city to facilitate the development of the digital location, supporting local objectives to modernize signage and improve overall corridor aesthetics. Lamar worked collaboratively with the city to align on development standards and ensure compatibility with local planning goals. Lamar has obtained all necessary entitlements and is currently awaiting construction materials to begin development, with the display anticipated to be operational by June/July 2026. All work is being completed in full compliance with applicable regulatory requirements, including obtaining necessary approvals from California Department of Transportation. Similar Project Number 6: Murrieta, CA Lamar operates LED digital billboard displays in the City of Murrieta, one of the newest cities to approve participation in this program. Lamar partnered with the city through a development agreement that allows for the operation of these digital displays while providing revenue participation to the city. The agreement also includes provisions for public messaging, including the promotion of city initiatives and emergency alert capabilities. Lamar is currently in the process of developing eight digital faces within the city. Four faces have been recently constructed and are operational, with the remaining four faces scheduled for development in the near term. As with all projects, Lamar has worked closely with the city to ensure alignment with local planning objectives and compliance with all regulatory requirements, including obtaining necessary approvals from California Department of Transportation. 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company II LosAngeles- Anaheim 11 Similar Project Number 7: Rancho Cucamonga, CA rue,-,onWarl Fard ara W— ti Elrn Outtot Lamar operates LED digital billboard displays in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, where four digital faces have been developed. Lamar partnered with the city through a development agreement that allows for the operation of these digital displays while providing revenue participation to the city. The agreement also includes provisions for public messaging, including the promotion of city initiatives and emergency alert capabilities. As part of the project, Lamar removed existing static billboard signage along surface streets, supporting the city's objectives to reduce visual clutter and enhance the overall aesthetic environment. Lamar worked collaboratively with the city to align on development standards and ensure compatibility with local planning goals. As with all projects, Lamar has worked closely with the city to ensure alignment with local planning objectives and compliance with all regulatory requirements, including obtaining necessary approvals from California Department of Transportation. Similar Project Number 8: Ontario International Airport Authority Lamar operates 2 LED digital display jr. bulletins (I O'x30') and 2 LED digital displays posters (I Vx22') on Ontario International Airport property. Lamar's response to the Ontario International Airport Authority's RFP was awarded and accepted as the winning bid for all exterior static and digital billboard signage. All displays for this project required leases `� with the Ontario International Airport Authority. Lamar obtained the necessary local and FAA permits. 2026 I Request For Proposal 12 Lamar Advertising Company II Los Angeles- Anaheim Similar Project Number 9: Corona, CA Lamar operates 8 freeway LED digital displays in the City of Corona. Project includes a profit sharing agreement with the city. Lamar worked closely with the city to develop an ordinance that: 1) permits digital displays in certain zones within the city, and 2) sets forth a static (nondigital) billboard net reduction program to demolish older static billboards, thereby beautifying the city. As in all projects, Lamar obtained all necessary Caltrans permits, local permits, and approvals for compliance with all federal, state and local legislation. '11 Similar Project Number 10: Fontana, CA W, Lamar operates 9 freeway LED digital displays on city -owned property, providing lease revenue to the city. Lamar partnered with the city to draft a comprehensive Ordinance to: 1) permit digital displays in certain zoning districts of the city; and, 2) allow for the relocation of already -constructed billboards via a relocation agreement to mutually benefit the city and Lamar. Lamar collaborated with the city by constructing and maintaining LED Digital Displays on city -owned property via a lease agreement, which provides consistent lease revenue to the City of Fontana. In addition to partnering with the City, Lamar successfully obtained all Caltrans permits, local permits for compliance with all federal, state and local legislation. 2026 II Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company II LosAngeles- Anaheim 13 CEQA Opinion Lamar is committed to the preservation and maintenance of the natural environment and firmly believes in strict adherence to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In all of the above projects, the lead agency has found that the construction of the LED digital displays were exempt from CEQA. Lamar believes that the City, as lead agency could use the exemption pursuant to Class 3 "Small Structures", 14 CCR Section 15303, which provides in part: Class 3 consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures; installation of small new equipment and facilities in small structures; and the conversion of existing small structures from one use to another where only minor modifications are made in the exterior of the structure. The numbers of structures described in this section are the maximum allowable on any legal parcel. Examples of this exemption include but are not limited to: A store, motel, office, restaurant or similar structure not involving the use of significant amounts of hazardous substances, and not exceeding 2500 square feet in floor area. In urbanized areas, the exemption also applies to up to four such commercial buildings not exceeding 10,000 square feet in floor area on sites zoned for such use if not involving the use of significant amounts of hazardous substances where all necessary public services and facilities are available and the surrounding area is not environmentally sensitive. However, should the City, as lead agency, deem the Project not exempt and determine that the potential environmental cumulative impacts of the Project are significant, Lamar would perform an Initial Study and, depending upon the result, prepare a Negative Declaration. 2026 II Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company II LosAngeles- Anaheim 14 References Damien Arrula City Administrator, City of Placentia, CA darrula@placentia.org (714) 993-8118 Dean Derlith City Attorney, City of Corona, CA Dean. Derleth@CoronaCA.gov (951) 279-3505 Deborah Robertson Mayor, City of Rialto, CA drobertson@rialtoca.gov (909) 644-8520 Jason Caudle City Manager, City of Lancaster, CA jcaudle@cityoflancasterca.org (661) 750-9311 Aequanetta Warren Mayor, City of Fontana, CA awarren@fontana.org (909) 578-2586 Wes Speake Mayor, City of Corona, CA wes.speake@corona.gov (951) 736-2371 2026 1 Request For Proposal 15 Lamar Advertising Company 11 Los Angeles- Anaheim UINIWIan toz r ME31—A-0 y g r ° • �' ,, - �. l :ter �., � �-� ° �• + � , I IN or IL �u a 0i 40 v, o r If m rZ Vol F e a NWC Lincoln ManchesterIRS w SEC Lincoln Manchestcr �" •"-.,, NWC Lincoln I Manchester Southbound NWC Lincoln I Manchester Northbound 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company 11 LosAngeles- Anaheim 18 SEC Lincoln I Manchester Southbound SEC Lincoln I Manchester Northbound 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company 11 LosAngeles- Anaheim 19 PROPOSED LOCATION 5 FWY Y k'5o. r' e 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company 11 LosAngeles- Anaheim 20 1050 E. Stanford Court- Northbound 1050 E. Stanford Court - Southbound 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company 11 LosAngeles- Anaheim 21 NWC Lewis I Anaheim - Northbound at 1300 ft. . _ r NWC Lewis I Anaheim - Northbound at 700 ft. 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company 11 LosAngeles- Anaheim 22 NWC Lewis I Anaheim - Southbound 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company 11 LosAngeles- Anaheim 23 PROPOSED LOCATION 91 FWY 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company 11 LosAngeles- Anaheim 24 8201 Santa Ana Canyon - Eastbound 8201 Santa Ana Canyon - Westbound 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company 11 LosAngeles- Anaheim 25 LEASED LOCATIONS ANAHEIM - 5 FWY, 57 FWY & 91 FWY 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company 11 LosAngeles- Anaheim 26 300 Wilshire - Northbound - 5 FWY 300 Wilshire - Southbound - 5 FWY 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company 11 LosAngeles- Anaheim 27 2590 Cerritos - 57 FWY r 3001 White Star - 91 FWY 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company 11 LosAngeles- Anaheim 28 I Imo L I UP . r AGREEMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS Term The proposed agreement is for a term of thirty (30) years, with an optional ten (10) year renewal period, subject to mutual agreement. Compensation to the City Lamar is prepared to provide the City of Anaheim with a significant and stable long-term revenue stream through this program. • Estimated Annual Compensation: Approximately $2,125,000 per year • Total Estimated Compensation (30 Year Term): Approximately $63,750,000 This structure is designed to provide the City with both predictable annual revenue and long-term financial value, while maintaining flexibility to finalize the underlying terms and conditions in collaboration with the City. Community Benefits • Economic Development: A 25% discount off the rate card for any business located within the City of Anaheim, supporting local economic growth and increased visibility for local businesses. • Public Safety & Messaging: Dedicated access for emergency alerts and public service messaging, including: AMBER Alerts Law enforcement notifications Earthquake and fire alerts Traffic messaging Public health communications Advertising Standards • No sexually oriented businesses (SOBs), including but not limited to adult entertainment venues, conventions, or related content. • All advertising will comply with applicable local, state, and federal regulations. 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company 11 LosAngeles- Anaheim so Insurance Lamar will maintain insurance coverage consistent with City of Anaheim requirements and all applicable California state laws. Regulatory Compliance All development and operations will be conducted in full compliance with applicable regulatory requirements, including obtaining necessary approvals from California Department of Transportation. Economic Impact & Partnership Value This program represents a meaningful long-term partnership between Lamar and the City of Anaheim, delivering both direct financial benefit and broader economic impact. In addition to the approximately $85 million in projected revenue to the City over the term, the program provides a platform to support local businesses, enhance public communication, and strengthen Anaheim's economic development initiatives. By combining sustained revenue generation with community -focused benefits, this proposal is designed to create lasting value for the City while aligning with Anaheim's broader goals for growth, visibility, and public engagement. 2026 II Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company II LosAngeles- Anaheim 31 Indemnity (As stated in our Development Agreement, Section B, item 15 on page 76 of this proposal) Indemnification. Developer agrees to, and shall, hold City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees free and harmless from all liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of Developer or those of Developer's contractor, subcontractor, agent, employee or other person acting on Developer's behalf which relate to the construction and operation of the Project. Developer agrees to, and shall, defend City and its elected and appointed officials, officers, agents and employees with respect to actions for damages caused or alleged to have been caused by reason of Developer's activities in connection with the Project. This hold harmless provision applies to all damages and claims for damage suffered or alleged to have been suffered by reason of the operations referred to in this Development Agreement regardless of whether or not the City prepared, supplied or approved the plans, specifications or other documents for the Project. 2026 11 Request For Proposal Lamar Advertising Company 11 LosAngeles- Anaheim 32 From: Stephanie Mercadante Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 5:05 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] On Behalf of Tom Felder, District 1, Councilmember Ryan Balius Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. For public comment on April 21, 2026: Good evening, Mayor and Council Members, We recognize the City has repeatedly stated that Anaheim's water is safe, and residents certainly want that to be true. But public confidence is built on transparency and trust, not on social media videos or assurances alone. Tonight's presentation is an opportunity for transparency. I expect it will emphasize that Anaheim's water is safe and regularly tested. Residents rely on City, State, and Federal experts to provide accurate information about our drinking water, and that information must be complete and consistent. We are here to ensure this discussion is substantive, not promotional. What residents need to understand is when decisions were made, why they were made, and whether they were made in a timely manner. Public statements show that the State notified the City on December 22, 2025, that Well 51, serving West Anaheim, had PFOS levels of 6.2 parts per trillion, exceeding the 4.0 ppt Notification Level. PFAS may sound minimal at parts per trillion, but it is measured at that scale because it is toxic even at extremely low concentrations. PFAS exposure is associated with immune suppression, thyroid disruption, liver damage, reproductive issues, and increased risk of kidney and testicular cancer. Under California law, including Health & Safety Code Section 116455 and State Water Board Division of Drinking Water guidance, the City is required to notify its governing body when a well exceeds the Notification Level. According to public records, Anaheim Public Utilities notified the City Council on February 17, 2026 that Well 51 was shut down. That raises a critical question: why did it take 58 days after the State's notification to inform the Council and initiate shutdown? Records also indicate the well was not actually shut down until March 6, 2026 — 17 days after the Council was told it was closed, and 74 days after the State's initial notification. These dates matter. They speak directly to whether required actions were taken promptly and whether the public received accurate, timely information about "forever chemicals" in their drinking water. If the public cannot rely on consistency in the information provided, then every future assurance becomes harder to trust. And at that point, the issue is no longer just about water quality; it is about credibility. From: Stephanie Mercadante Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 5:06 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] On Behalf of Georgia Price, District 6, Councilmember Natalie Meeks Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. For public comment on April 21, 2026: Good evening, Mayor and Council Members, This issue comes down to three dates: 2 3. When PFOS contamination was detected, 4. 5. 6. 7. When the State was notified, 8. 9. 10. 11. When Well 51 was actually taken off line. 12 These dates are critical to determining whether the public received timely and accurate information. Based on available records, the State was notified in late December that PFOS levels at Well 51 exceeded the notification threshold. Yet the well appears to have remained in service until early March, approximately 74 days later. Residents were also told the well was taken off line on or about February 17, while other records indicate it continued operating beyond that date. This is not a matter of interpretation. It is a matter of dates. And dates do not change. If both February and March appear in the record, the public deserves to know which one reflects reality —and why they were told something different. Beyond the timeline, there is a larger question. The City has previously taken other wells offline due to PFAS concerns. This is not a new situation, and there is already an established approach for responding to exceedances. So what was different here? What factors led to the decision to continue operating Well 51 for more than two months after the exceedance was identified, when more immediate action has been taken in other cases? If there were operational constraints, blending strategies, or system limitations, those should be clearly explained. But if this was a discretionary decision, then the public deserves to understand the reasoning behind it, especially given the known risks associated with PFAS exposure over time. So tonight, I am asking for something straightforward: Please provide a clear, documented timeline for Well 51, and explain the decision -making process that led to the delay in taking the well off line. When timelines don't align and decisions aren't explained, the issue is no longer just water quality. It becomes a question of whether the public can trust the information they're being given. And confidence in our water system depends not only on safety, but on transparency and consistency. From: Stephanie Mercadante Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 5:10 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] On Behalf of Marc Herbert Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. For public comment on April 21, 2026: Good evening, Mayor and Council Members, I want to address an issue that is critical to public confidence: whether water sampling reflects normal system conditions or ideal ones. The City continues to state that the water is safe, but those assurances rely on compliance sampling. The strength of those results depends on one principle: that samples represent the water residents receive every day, not conditions that are optimized beforehand. Right now, there is a growing gap between what residents are experiencing and what they are being told. Residents are reporting strong chlorine odors, discoloration, and inconsistent water quality. Whether those issues are temporary, localized, or systemic, they raise a fundamental question: do compliance samples reflect what residents actually experience at their tap, or something different? So tonight, I am requesting clarity on the City's sampling protocols, specifically as they relate to system flushing. Does the City conduct hydrant flushing before or after compliance sampling? If so, under what conditions? And are those activities disclosed when results are presented to the public or to this Council? If operational activities like flushing occur immediately before sampling, it raises a reasonable concern: are those samples capturing normal, day-to-day water quality, or temporarily improved conditions? This is not an accusation; it is a request for transparency. If the system is operating properly, then the sampling methodology should stand up to scrutiny and be clearly explained. I would also ask whether the State Water Board has reviewed these practices, and whether they consider them representative of typical system conditions if flushing occurs between tests. At the end of the day, this comes down to trust. If sampling reflects ideal conditions instead of typical conditions, then "safe" becomes a moving target. Residents are not asking for best -case scenarios. They are asking for an accurate picture of what comes out of their tap every day. And when residents turn to bottled water while being told everything is fine, that is not just perception; it is a breakdown in public confidence. So tonight, I am asking the City to close that gap with transparency, not just reassurance. From: Stephanie Mercadante Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 5:15 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] On Behalf of Stephanie Mercadante, District 4, Councilmember Norma Campos Kurtz Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. For public comment on April 21, 2026: Good evening, Mayor and Council Members, What we are hearing tonight is not just a technical discussion; it is a matter of public trust. Residents are being asked to rely on repeated assurances that the water is safe. But when timelines don't align, when operational details are unclear, and when reasonable questions go unanswered, that trust erodes. So I want to be clear about what is being requested tonight. We are asking the City's presentation to directly address: • The discrepancy between the February and March Well 51 shutdown dates • The decision not to take the well offline immediately after the State's December notification • And whether operational practices — such as flushing — may influence sampling results, including whether • normal flushing times are five minutes rather than the 30-60 minutes residents have reported, and whether these practices are reviewed by anyone outside the City of Anaheim These are not extreme questions. They are reasonable, and they deserve direct answers. Because when the information provided to the public does not fully align with regulatory data, it creates doubt, intentional or not. And once doubt is introduced, the burden shifts back to the City to provide clarity. There is also a broader concern. Residents are reporting chlorine odors, discoloration, and inconsistent water quality while being told the water is safe. Are these complaints being recorded and 1 tracked? Is that information available to the public? That gap between official messaging and lived experience is exactly why these questions matter. Claims of safety rely on testing, but testing only builds trust if it reflects normal conditions. So we are asking a straightforward question: do sampling results reflect what residents actually experience at the tap, or conditions influenced by system practices like flushing? And, just as importantly, has the State reviewed those practices to confirm they are representative, or are they simply accepting what they are told while residents' concerns go unaddressed? If testing reflects best -case conditions instead of typical conditions, then the water isn't safe in any meaningful sense. Here is the bottom line: If the water is safe, the data should be consistent. If the process is sound, it should be transparent. And if the City is confident in both, then these questions should be easy to answer. Clearly, directly, and on the record. Repeating that the water is safe is not enough. Holding up water bottles is not enough. Posting videos on social media is not enough. Provide a presentation that shows the proof, not pretty photos and charts. From: Stephanie Mercadante Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 9:55 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: On Behalf of Dave Duran, District 1, Councilmember Ryan Balius Attachments: 2026_04_20_23_02_07_1.m p3 Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Replying again on this thread to include the audio that was played during today's Public Comments. Please find it attached. On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 5:19 PM Stephanie Mercadante For public comment on April 21, 2026: wrote: In case the public didn't get a chance to hear and/or attend the March 24t" City Council meeting, I believe it is important to listen to what the mayor is telling the public: PLAY RECORDING Thanks to tonight's last few speakers, the mayor and the council have "again" learned that there are residents of this city that have been sounding an alarm of critical importance because the mayor and the council have `again" failed to do ... So tonight, I want to document and let the public know that they should seriously consider having their Anaheim tap water tested for their personal safety ... the safety of their family ... their pets, and/or their employees since it's evident that Anaheim officials have failed to properly take the necessary actions... which are probably required by law ... to immediately notify its residents while taking the required actions to immediately mitigate imminent and/or potential harm to the public. I am asking the Anaheim residents, Anaheim business owners, and Anaheim employees to save and call this phone number to help make sure your drinking water is safe... For more information and or to share your concerns, please call the EPA - Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 1-800-426- 4791... AGAIN, that's 1-800-426-4791. On December 5, 2025 USA Today reported that analysis of the records shows water utilities in Anaheim California has joined 944 systems scattered across the country that have also failed to meet the EPA standards. The summary report stated: On average, PFOS was measured 4.5 times over the limit at Well 47. Altogether, testing detected seven chemicals at 12 locations. The highest single measurement was 7.3 times over the allowable limit. And according to the results found by the Environmental Protection Agency, (published in November 2025) Anaheim's PFSA was well over the limit. 1 Well 51... Well 47... what other failed wells are missing from the report? .... What else have Anaheim officials failed to be transparent about? ... more important is how many residents have been harmed by the city's silence? This city needs to publicly and immediately notify everyone... residents, schools, and businesses that were and are currently in jeopardy of suffering harm from being in contact and/or ingesting the potentially toxic city water. Please do not dismiss our genuine concerns, documented findings, or comments. In closing, if you are not motivated to take action to improve the health and safety of all the people who live, work, go to school, or visit Anaheim, please immediately resign so someone more qualified can replace you for the health, safety and betterment of society ... OR ... do what the residents of this city elected you to do because the public deserves to know the truth instead of being misinformed or lied to by the person they voted to represent them.... Are Disney lobbyists paying you or telling you to stay quiet about the toxic water so the tourists won't decide to not go to Disneyland because the water isn't safe to drink... or conventions and shows won't want to plan or book hotels and/or events at the convention center... is this why the residents are being neglected, misinformed and/or or lied to? ... Who do you believe the Environmental Protection Agency, USA Today, Anaheim's own reports/findings or the mayor who either believes, is misinformed, or who is maliciously lying to the public stating that the water is safe... z From: Stephanie Mercadante Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 5:20 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] On Behalf of Dave Duran, District 1, Councilmember Ryan Balius Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. For public comment on April 21, 2026: In case the public didn't get a chance to hear and/or attend the March 24t" City Council meeting, I believe it is important to listen to what the mayor is telling the public: PLAY RECORDING Thanks to tonight's last few speakers, the mayor and the council have "again" learned that there are residents of this city that have been sounding an alarm of critical importance because the mayor and the council have `again" failed to do ... So tonight, I want to document and let the public know that they should seriously consider having their Anaheim tap water tested for their personal safety ... the safety of their family ... their pets, and/or their employees since it's evident that Anaheim officials have failed to properly take the necessary actions... which are probably required by law ... to immediately notify its residents while taking the required actions to immediately mitigate imminent and/or potential harm to the public. I am asking the Anaheim residents, Anaheim business owners, and Anaheim employees to save and call this phone number to help make sure your drinking water is safe... For more information and or to share your concerns, please call the EPA - Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 1-800-426-4791... AGAIN, that's 1-800-426-4791. On December 5, 2025 USA Today reported that analysis of the records shows water utilities in Anaheim California has joined 944 systems scattered across the country that have also failed to meet the EPA standards. The summary report stated: On average, PFOS was measured 4.5 times over the limit at Well 47. Altogether, testing detected seven chemicals at 12 locations. The highest single measurement was 7.3 times over the allowable limit. And according to the results found by the Environmental Protection Agency, (published in November 2025) Anaheim's PFSA was well over the limit. Well 51... Well 47... what other failed wells are missing from the report? .... What else have Anaheim officials failed to be transparent about? ... more important is how many residents have been harmed by the city's silence? 1 This city needs to publicly and immediately notify everyone... residents, schools, and businesses that were and are currently in jeopardy of suffering harm from being in contact and/or ingesting the potentially toxic city water. Please do not dismiss our genuine concerns, documented findings, or comments. In closing, if you are not motivated to take action to improve the health and safety of all the people who live, work, go to school, or visit Anaheim, please immediately resign so someone more qualified can replace you for the health, safety and betterment of society ... OR ... do what the residents of this city elected you to do because the public deserves to know the truth instead of being misinformed or lied to by the person they voted to represent them.... Are Disney lobbyists paying you or telling you to stay quiet about the toxic water so the tourists won't decide to not go to Disneyland because the water isn't safe to drink... or conventions and shows won't want to plan or book hotels and/or events at the convention center... is this why the residents are being neglected, misinformed and/or or lied to? ... Who do you believe the Environmental Protection Agency, USA Today, Anaheim's own reports/findings or the mayor who either believes, is misinformed, or who is maliciously lying to the public stating that the water is safe... z From: Bobby Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2026 5:27 PM To: Sjany Larson -Cash; Audrey Lujan; Ashleigh Aitken; Norma C. Kurtz; Natalie Meeks; Kristen Maahs; Ryan Balius; Carlos A. Leon; Natalie Rubalcava; Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Happy Tuesday everyone I like for the Library to get extended to least an hour opening and closing and in other cities around Orange County besides Orange because they have difficulties right now to see if I can open at 10 AM and close at 8 PM Library in Anaheim open at 11 it's basically the morning gone. I'd like to see them all the libraries in Anaheim open at 10 and close at 8 o'clock and it's time for the all the libraries open on Saturdays thank you for your time Sent from my iPhone From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Ruben Soto Wednesday, April 8, 2026 4:56 AM [EXTERNAL] Watch "#anaheim city council meeting" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Ruben Soto [EXTERNAL] #i'm not a rat I don't call police when you're a dirt back to me boys Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Sent: To: Subject: Ruben Soto Monday, April 13, 2026 12:07 PM [EXTERNAL] Watch "#who's not doing theirjob government" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Sent: To: Subject: Ruben Sot [EXTERNAL] Corruption in the court system District attorneys, public defenders , lawyers Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Sent: To: Subject: Ruben Soto Tuesday, April 14, 2026 3:52 PM [EXTERNAL] Watch "#Riverside City council meeting keep it up boys" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Sent: To: Subject: Ruben Soto Saturday, April 18, 2026 3:00 PM [EXTERNAL] Watch "#security downtown Disney Anaheim City council meeting" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Sent: To: Subject: Ruben Soto [EXTERNAL] Walk away you know how from your responsibility Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Sent: To: Subject: Ruben Soto Sunday, April 19, 2026 5:27 PM [EXTERNAL] Riverside City council meeting Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Sent: To: Subject: Ruben Soto Sunday, April 19, 2026 9:02 PM [EXTERNAL] The true patriot Mr Ruben Greg Soto Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Sent: To: Subject: Ruben Soto [EXTERNAL] Watch "#when you do someone wrong like me the wrong come back and get you" on YouTube Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. From: Sent: To: Subject: Ruben Soto [EXTERNAL] Fwd: Your 2026 Marijuana Roadmap Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Morgan & Morgan, P.A. <reply(,-Oreply.forthepeople.com> Date: Mon, Apr 20, 2026, 2:37 PM Subject: Your 2026 Marijuana Roadmap To: Advertising Material I News from Morgan & Morgan I View Online AMERICA'S LARGEST INJURY LAW FIRM Injured? We're here to help. Start your free case evaluation today. 1 There's no better day than April 20th to take stock of where marijuana laws actually stand. The legal landscape has shifted dramatically in recent years, but so has the conversation around how people use it, and why. Whether it's already a staple in your life or you're simply curious about what's changed lately, here's what you need to know. Marijuana as Medicine When it comes to medical marijuana, there's no "right way" that works for everyone. It helps to think about how quickly you need relief, how long you want the effects to last, and whether your doctor has any guidance. Here's a look at the most common methods to help you weigh your options. • Smoking: For most people, smoking is the first method that comes to mind. It offers a rapid onset of effects within minutes (or even seconds), making it useful for symptoms that need quick relief. However, smoking carries risks and can be harmful to your lungs. With that in mind, it's generally not the first recommendation for medical use. • Vaping: Like smoking, vaping works quickly. Vape pens and herb vaporizers avoid smoke, but it's worth knowing that they may expose you to substances that can cause lung damage. • Edibles: If you don't need immediate relief, edibles are a popular alternative to smoking and vaping. Marijuana can be infused into baked goods, gummies, chocolates, and more. While they take longer to kick in (anywhere from 30 minutes to 2 hours), the effects tend to last longer than smoking. This makes them a good fit for managing symptoms that benefit from sustained relief. • Tinctures: Like edibles, tinctures let you skip the smoke entirely. These cannabis -infused liquids (usually alcohol or oil -based) can be taken in small doses under the tongue or mixed into a drink. The onset tends to fall somewhere between smoking and edibles. • Lotions & Balms: Cannabis -infused lotions, oils, and balms are applied directly to the skin. This method is less studied than the others, and there's no firm consensus yet on how effective it is. Anecdotally, some people have found it helpful for skin conditions, inflammation, and localized discomfort. Know the Law Where You Live Marijuana laws vary more than you might think. Understanding the distinctions can help you make informed decisions. • Medical Use: Marijuana is used to treat pain associated with a growing number of medical conditions. Although the process varies from state to state, patients interested in medical marijuana can become certified through their healthcare provider forth etreatment of qualified illnesses. In some states, caregivers can be granted their own cards to enable them to pick up and administer medical marijuana for their loved ones. • Recreational & Medical Use: In states where recreational use is legalized, adults 21+ are allowed to purchase, consume, and sometimes even grow marijuana without a qualifying medical condition. But before you rush to your nearest dispensary, don't forget to check the specific laws in place foryour state. There may be limitations on the number of ounces you can purchase or the number of plants you can grow in your home. • CBD/Low-THC: CBD, short for "cannabidiol" is a compound found in cannabis plants that doesn't make you feel "high." Studies have shown that CBD may be effective in treating epilepsy, chronic pain, and insomnia among other conditions. In the 10 states that don't allow medical or recreational marijuana usage, CBD/low-THC products may still be available. Traveling soon? Before you packyour bags, be sure to check the marijuana laws where you're going. And remember: even between two legal states, crossing state lines with marijuana is still a federal offense. ME AK VT7DC MA WA MT ND S MN WI MI NYRI OR ID WY NE IA IL IN OH CO KS MO KY WV MD DE AZ NM OK AR TN VA GA NC TX LA MS AL SC Recreational and Medical use CBD/Low HTC medical use 0 only only Source: Encyclopedia Britannica Georgia legislature has approved a bill that would lift limits on THC content in medical marijuana, and has been sent to the governor to be signed into law. A Brief History of Pot Daddy 5 Marijuana is personal to John Morgan's family: his father and brother have benefited from use of medical marijuana to ease painful symptoms without the harmful side effects or addictive qualities of powerful pain medications. So, together with United for Care, we joined the fight to legalize medical marijuana in Florida. After gathering 700,000 signatures to get it on the ballot, a failed attempt to pass it in 2014, and millions of dollars spent, medical marijuana legalization finally passed with 71 % of the vote in 2016. John Morgan was lovingly dubbed "Pot Daddy." Shop Pot Daddy Celebrate 4/20 with the very best of Pot Daddy merch. Use discount code FTP420 for a 10% discount. Offer ends April 30th. Shop Now 6 TRIVIA What percent of Americans believe that medical marijuana should be legalized?* *AreordIrkg,to a 2C25 study U the Pew ReSeareh Cerorer Sc: Ups ,u t he bottom for answer_ e How We Can Hel 833.573.0545 1 forthepeople.com I contact@forthepeople.com ©2026 Morgan & Morgan, PA. All Right Reserved. Te podemos ayudar en Espanol 1855.925.0666 1 www.abogados.com America's largest injury law firm. Morgan & Morgan, P.A., RESULTS ARE BASED ON CUMULATIVE RECOVERIES ACROSS MORGAN & MORGAN'S OFFICES NATIONWIDE. ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT. Morgan & Morgan, P.A. is a lawfirm located at . The lawyers responsible for this ad are licensed in Florida and may rely on co -counsel for some or all of the cases. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision, and it should never be based solely upon an advertisement. Before making your choice of any attorney, you should give this matter careful thought. The selection of an attorney is an important decision. No representation is made that the legal services to be performed are greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. Every case is different and must be judged on its own merit. No representation is made here about your specific rights. Cases will be handled by attorneys licensed in the local jurisdiction. Any attorney appearing in this ad may not be licensed in the local jurisdiction. Morgan & Morgan has lawyers licensed to practice law in a1150 states and Washington DC. Orlando FL. Cases may be associated with, or referred to, other law firms as co -counsel or referral counsel in these and other jurisdictions. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. No representation is made that the lawyers are certified specialists or experts in any field of law. Contingent attorney fees are negotiable and not set by law. No legal fees or costs will be charged unless a recovery is obtained for the client. No legal services or advice will be provided unless a written agreement is signed by the client and lawyer. Only the law firm's non -lawyer staffed call center is open 24 hours a day / 7 days a week. Portions of this ad may be a simulation, not showing actual persons or events. FREE BACKGROUND INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. Disclaimer and Terms of Use From: Mike Hazelrigg <mike.hazelrigg@hume.org> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2026 11:41 AM To: Mike Hazelrigg Subject: [EXTERNAL] Invitation to Hume Christian Camps- Free Fundraising Event in Newport Beach You don't often get email from mike.hazelrigg@hume.org. Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Dear Councilmembers and City Leaders, I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to invite you to attend the Ripple of Life: Expanding Impact Gala, a special fundraising event supporting the work of Hume Christian Camps at the Harborside Grand Ballroom in Newport Beach. The ministry of Hume Christian Camps provides year-round youth camps and retreats that focus on mentorship, character development, and building strong, values -centered communities for young people. The gala will be an evening dedicated to sharing stories of impact, connecting with community leaders, and raising support to expand opportunities for youth to experience these life -changing programs. More details and registration can be found here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/ripple-of-life-expanding-impact-gala-tickets- 1983487568712?aff=oddtdtcreator We would be honored by your presence at this event, as your leadership plays an important role in supporting initiatives that strengthen families, youth development, and community well-being. Would you consider signing up for a table or two? There is no charge for the event, but there will be an opportunity to support the ministry if you feel led to do so. Please let me know if you have any questions or if we can assist with your attendance. I would be happy to provide additional details. Thank you for your service to our community, and I hope you can join us. Warm Regards, 1 Mike Mike Hazeirigg Major Gift Officer CenCal I Development (559) 970-8425 1 hume.org Learn more about giving, gift planning, or donor advisement. From: Rep. Lou Correa<repcorrea@mail8.housecommunications.gov> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2026 3:57 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] 4.10.26 Weekly Update Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. LOU C"RREA REPRESENTATIVE/,wCALIFORNIA'S 46T" DISTRICT Hello, Sq DOWNTOWN �i ` EtANGE� (I, aF yam- �fppf��q I hope this message finds you well. It's been a busy week working for California's 46th Congressional District, and I want to take a moment to share a quick update: A Dog's Day Out Last weekend, I was excited to celebrate the opening of Santa Ana's first dog park at Centennial Park and see so many neighbors out enjoying it. This is a space built for happy tails and a lot of new four -legged friendships. You could say it's a pawsitive addition to our community! 1 Rep. Lou Correa interacts with a happy doggo who enjoyed the new park. Congressional Art Competition High School Students: My office is now accepting submissions for the 2026 Congressional Art Competition! Show us what makes our community special through your eyes. Whether it's a detailed sketch, a powerful photograph, or a painting, we want to see your creativity. The deadline to submit your artwork is April 15th @ 5 PM. for additional information on the Congressional Art Competition. LOU C "' RREA REPRESENTATIVE/,",CALIFORNIA'S 46- DISTRICT CONGRESSIONAL ART Submission Due: Wednesday, April 15, 2026 Cd 5:00PM Enter your artwork for the unique opportunity to have it displayed inside the U.S. Capitol! For Additional Guidelines Visit: Coriea.house.gov/services/art-contest Call: (714) 559-6igo As always, I am committed to serving you, representing your interests in committee hearings, and standing for our underrepresented immigrant communities. If you need assistance, are applying for 3 a work permit, or have any immigration questions, my office is here to help. Give us a call at (714) 559-6190. Sincerely, Rep. Lou Correa Member of Congress Sign up for my newsletter to get updates on this issue and others! �rOo Visit my website to learn more! Contact Me Washington D.C. 1039 Longworth House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Santa Ana Rancho Santiago Community College Building 2323 N. Broadway, Suite 319 (202) 225-2965 Santa Ana, CA 92706 (714) 559-6190 Unsubscribe from future messages. From: Rep. Lou Correa<repcorrea@mail8.housecommunications.gov> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2026 5:34 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] 4.17.26 Weekly Update Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. LOU C"RREA REPRESENTATIVE/,wCALIFORNIA'S 46T" DISTRICT Hello, Sq DQ1NN70WN ` It's been another busy week in Orange County and Washington, D.C., working for California's 46th Congressional District. Here are some highlights: Presenting Federal Funding to the Fullerton Fire Department I was proud to secure federal funding for the Fullerton Fire Department. Firefighters serve on the front lines of many of the worst tragedies that communities face, which is why it is incredibly important that they have the resources they need to effectively and safely respond to emergencies. Learn more by watching s news segment and the _=ullerton 0x"." `s article about my event. 1 Rep. Lou Correa speaks to the Fullerton Fire Department. One Big Ugly Bill Over 46,000 people in our community will lose access to health coverage due to Medicaid cuts in the Republicans' One Big Ugly Bill. AND guess what? Republicans in Washington set up a vote this week to celebrate that. Q Rep. Lou Correa explains the One Big "Ugly" Bill. Fighting for DACA Recipients I led 86 colleagues to from the Secretary of Homeland Security on why DACA recipients are facing major renewal delays —causing financial hardship, job loss, and even detention and removal. DACA recipients deserve protection and a pathway to citizenship, not to be failed by their government. Read NOTUS' article to find out more. NOTUS ICE Is Detaining DACA Recipients April 10, 202E r LJ Vote to Remove U.S. Forces from Iran War Congress is the branch of government with the sole power to declare war. 4 We are at war in Iran. Yet, the President has yet to justify to Congress why we are engaged in this war, what the objectives are, when these objectives will be accomplished, and what a win looks like. Congress needs to reassert our authority to declare war. This nation must not be part of any efforts to destroy the Persian Civilization or any other civilization. I voted for the Iran war powers legislation to cease American efforts in this war. National Institute on Drug Abuse Director Speaks to PATH Caucus Honored to have Dr. Nora Volkow, the National Institute on Drug Abuse Director, join me and my PATH Caucus Co-chair Rep. Jack Bergman to discuss clinical research on psychedelic therapies and how these emerging therapies show strong results in treating addiction, depression, and other conditions. Rep. Lou Correa meets with Dr. Nora Volkow at the PATH Caucus roundtable. Honoring Sylvia Mendez reminds us of the importance of standing up for yourself and your community. Californians should be aware that school segregation was not just an injustice that occurred in the 'Jim Crow' South, but it happened right here too. Recognizing both Sylvia Mendez's story and the landmark Mendez v. Westminste ruling through a state holiday will help shine a light on the history of school segregation in Orange County, the perseverance of the Latino community, and how a young girl has the power to make sweeping change. R au0S�Q°w Rep. Lou Correa awards Sylvia Mendez a Congressional Certificate. Orange County Job Fair On April 23 from 11 am to 2 pm, Santa Ana College will be hosting a job fair. Interested in attending? Register I'm proud to serve you —whether that means advocating for your priorities in committee hearings or championing the voices of our underrepresented immigrant communities. If you're navigating the immigration process, applying for a work permit, or simply have questions, my office is ready to help every step of the way. Don't hesitate to reach out at (714) 559-6190—we're here for you. Sincerely, Rep. Lou Correa Member of Congress Sign up for my newsletter to get updates on this issue and others! :fZyZoZ�7 Visit my website to learn more! Contact Me Washington D.C. Santa Ana 2082 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 (202) 225-2965 Rancho Santiago Community College Building 2323 N. Broadway, Suite 319 Santa Ana, CA 92706 (714) 559-6190 Unsubscribe from future messages. From: jodiemosley Sent: Friday, April 10, 2026 4:54 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Thank you Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Thank you Ryan Balius for everything you are trying to do for west Anaheim. It is SO hard fighting this corrupt system, and I just want to recognize your efforts. I wish desperately district one was more more focused on by the whole city, but I do see what you are doing, and respect it. Good luck! Jodie Mosley Sent from my Galaxy From: jodiemosley Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2026 11:11 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Prostitutes on beach and ball Attachments: 20260412_110845 j pg Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. We are sick of this. POUR YOUR ENERGY INTO DISTRICT ONE. Ryan Balius is trying. But he can't do it ALONE. Sent from my Galaxy p n lle. t�jSrki, r..rr �rX'T R AM I L E Che i I wltA TECHRON I EXTRA M I l E A Ich° v L From: Sent: To: Subject: Craig A Durfey [EXTERNAL] Fwd: Screen time Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. ---------- Forwarded messa e--------- From: Craig Durfey Date: Sat, Apr 11, 2026 at 12:21 AM Subject: Screen time https://www.facebook.com/reel/972153234767657?fs=e&mibextid=wwXlfr&fs=e Sent from my Phone From: Sent: To: Subject: Craig A Durfey [EXTERNAL] Fwd: Sharing California students author new 'digital wellness' bill, say school cellphone bans fall short Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Craig A Durfey Date: Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 12:23 PM Subject: Sharing California students author new `digital wellness' bill, say school cellphone bans fall short To: Craig Durfey Maureen Blackmun I thought you would want to see this interesting story from EdSource: https://edsource.org/?p=755990 From: Lori Hughes Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2026 5:32 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Festival Center Project Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. To Council Members who voted for Festival Center development: You all know what you did is wrong!!! Anaheim Hills has already fulfilled its housing requirements, even beyond at least two other districts! Your decision to put the Anaheim Hills residents at even greater risk when we face another wildfire is unconscionable!!! Please, please, reverse course! Do not allow this Shea apartment complex to be built at Festival Center. Build it somewhere safer in our district. Please!!!! How could you even think it's okay to build it in the middle of a severe fire danger zone when it already takes three hours to go 1 /4 of a mile during an evacuation! Please stop this project from going forward! You have to!!!!! This is not fun and games for those of us who live here. This is life and death!!! Please search your souls and do the right thing for us. Stop this project now!!! This project is wrong for Festival on so many levels. Do not allow this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Regards, Lori Hughes From: Lori Hughes Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2026 2:49 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Anaheim Hills fire destroys homes - ABC7 Los Angeles Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Anaheim Hills fire destroys homes - ABC7 Los Angeles https://abc7.com/videoC[ip/2512964/ From: Lori Hughes Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 8:10 AM To: Public Comment <publiccomment@anaheim.net> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Festival Center high rise apartment complex. Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Bing = Q anaheim hills wildfires 0 ALL Z SEARCH IMAGES VIDEOS MAPS COPILOT Copilot Search Anaheim Hills Wildfires The Anaheim Hills are currently facing wildfire risks due to a combination of factors such as vegetation and fuel sources, possible ignition sources, and environmental conditions. The region has experienced significant wildfires in the past, with the 2017 Canyon Fire being a notable example that impacted 447 buildings in Anaheim. The risk of wildfires in the Anaheim Hills is projected to increase over the next 30 years, with 8,969 properties in the area having some risk of being affected. The community is encouraged to be prepared and aware of their evacuation routes to ensure safety during a wildfire emergency. c-D 7 ,!� wildfiretrackers.com Wildfires/Smoke near CZ anaheim hills W 900 1 From: Khue Bui Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2026 1:09 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] Release the footage and autopsy! Fire Albert Arzola's killers! You don't often get email fro Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for Albert Arzola, who was killed by police. I demand the release of the full, unedited body camera footage from every officer involved, the immediate release of the autopsy report, the disclosure of the officers' names, and the immediate termination of the officer who fatally shot Albert. Albert was ambushed by two Anaheim PD officers who jumped out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his own home. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front of his family. The officers then threatened to shoot his family and held them at the scene for hours. They delayed providing medical care for ten minutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert had done nothing wrong and posed no threat to anyone. He was only 19 years old and had recently graduated from Katella High School. He was a hardworking resident of Anaheim who took pride in his job and dreamed of a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member, and friend with a bright future ahead of him. Albert should still be alive today. I demand the full body camera footage from all officers at the scene. I demand the release of the autopsy report. I demand the names of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Khue Bui From: Sonya Lopez Sent: Monday, April 20, 2026 11:01 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the immediate release of the autopsy report, the names of the officers involved, and the immediate firing of the officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two Anaheim PD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front of his family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained them at the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten minutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated from Katella High School. He was a hard-working resident of Anaheim who took pride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him. Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers from the incident. I demand the release of the autopsy report. I demand the names of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Sonya Lopez Sent from my iPhone From: Erika Armenta Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 7:12 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! You don't often get email fro Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the immediate release of the autopsy report, the names of the officers involved, and the immediate firing of the officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two Anaheim PD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front of his family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained them at the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten minutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated from Katella High School. He was a hard-working resident of Anaheim who took pride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him. Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers from the incident. I demand the release of the autopsy report. I demand the names of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! From: David Pulido Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 7:16 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! You don't often get email fro Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the immediate release of the autopsy report, the names of the officers involved, and the immediate firing of the officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two Anaheim PD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front of his family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained them at the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten minutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated from Katella High School. He was a hard-working resident of Anaheim who took pride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him. Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers from the incident. I demand the release of the autopsy report. I demand the names of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! From: Matthew Compton Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:31 AM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! You don't often get email from Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the immediate release of the autopsy report, the names of the officers involved, and the immediate firing of the officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two Anaheim PD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front of his family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained them at the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten minutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated from Katella High School. He was a hard-working resident of Anaheim who took pride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him. Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers from the incident. I demand the release of the autopsy report. I demand the names of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! From: Johanna Lopez Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 11:48 AM To: Public Comment Cc: Subject: [EXTERNAL] Comment Re: Justice for Albert Arzola You don't often get email from Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. I am the mother of Brandon Lopez, and I was present the day my son was killed by Anaheim police. What happened to my son was not a split-second decision. It unfolded over time, with opportunities to slow things down, to communicate, and to choose a different outcome. My son was unarmed, and yet deadly force was used. We were told that lessons would be learned —that changes in training and tactics would come from his death. But years later, in the case of Albert Arzola, we are hearing the same things again: questions about whether a weapon was present, rapid escalation, and a lack of clear de-escalation. So I am asking plainly: what has actually changed? Where are the improvements in threat assessment, in crisis response, in the use of time and distance to prevent loss of life? Why are families still left with the same unanswered questions? My son's life should have led to meaningful reform. Instead, we are seeing the same patterns repeat. I am asking this council to demand real accountability and to ensure that changes are not just promised, but proven. Johanna Lopez From: Grace Arzola Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 12:08 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the immediate release of the autopsy report, the names of the officers involved, and the immediate firing of the officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two Anaheim PD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front of his family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained them at the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten minutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated from Katella High School. He was a hard-working resident of Anaheim who took pride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him. Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers from the incident. I demand the release of the autopsy report. I demand the names of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Respectfully, Grace Arzola From: Teresa Cortez Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 12:15 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the immediate release of the autopsy report, the names of the officers involved, and the immediate firing of the officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two Anaheim PD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front of his family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained them at the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten minutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated from Katella High School. He was a hard-working resident of Anaheim who took pride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him. Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers from the incident. I demand the release of the autopsy report. I demand the names of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Sent from my iPhone From: Cynthia Cortez Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 12:19 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the immediate release of the autopsy report, the names of the officers involved, and the immediate firing of the officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two Anaheim PD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front of his family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained them at the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten minutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated from Katella High School. He was a hard-working resident of Anaheim who took pride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him. Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers from the incident. I demand the release of the autopsy report. I demand the names of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Sent from my iPhone From: Stephanie Arzola Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 12:30 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the immediate release of the autopsy report, the names of the officers involved, and the immediate firing of the officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two Anaheim PD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front of his family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained them at the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten minutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated from Katella High School. He was a hard-working resident of Anaheim who took pride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him. Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers from the incident. I demand the release of the autopsy report. I demand the names of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Sent from my iPhone From: Pearl Arzola Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 12:50 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the immediate release of the autopsy report, the names of the officers involved, and the immediate firing of the officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two Anaheim PD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front of his family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained them at the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten minutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated from Katella High School. He was a hard-working resident of Anaheim who took pride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him. Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers from the incident. I demand the release of the autopsy report. I demand the names of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Sent from my iPhone From: Ariana Avalos Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 12:52 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! You don't often get email from earn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the immediate release of the autopsy report, the names of the officers involved, and the immediate firing of the officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two Anaheim PD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front of his family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained them at the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten minutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated from Katella High School. He was a hard-working resident of Anaheim who took pride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him. Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers from the incident. I demand the release of the autopsy report. I demand the names of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! From: stephanie dorantes Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 12:56 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! [You don't often get email from . Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the immediate release of the autopsy report, the names of the officers involved, and the immediate firing of the officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two Anaheim PD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front of his family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained them at the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten minutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated from Katella High School. He was a hard-working resident of Anaheim who took pride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him. Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers from the incident. I demand the release of the autopsy report. I demand the names of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Sincerely, Stephanie Dorantes From: Baac Garcia Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 3:15 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the immediate release of the autopsy report, the names of the officers involved, and the immediate firing of the officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two Anaheim PD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front of his family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained them at the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten minutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated from Katella High School. He was a hard-working resident of Anaheim who took pride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him. Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers from the incident. I demand the release of the autopsy report. I demand the names of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! From: Peter Arzola Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 7:48 PM To: Public Comment Subject: [EXTERNAL] No more silence! Justice for Albert Arzola! [You don't often get email from Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ] Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Mayor Aitken and Members of the Anaheim City Council, I am writing to demand justice for the police killing of Albert Arzola. I demand the full, unedited body camera footage from all officers, the immediate release of the autopsy report, the names of the officers involved, and the immediate firing of the officer who shot Albert to death. Albert was ambushed by two Anaheim PD officers who leapt out of an unmarked vehicle and chased him to his house. One officer shot him in the back, killing him in front of his family. They threatened to shoot his family and then detained them at the scene for hours. They delayed medical attention for ten minutes and dragged Albert's lifeless body onto the sidewalk. Albert was doing nothing wrong and was not a threat to anyone. He was only 19-years-old and recently graduated from Katella High School. He was a hard-working resident of Anaheim who took pride in his job and aspired to a career in culinary arts. He was a beloved son, family member and friend with a bright future ahead of him. Albert should be alive today! I demand the full body camera footage of all officers from the incident. I demand the release of the autopsy report. I demand the names of the officers involved. And I demand that the officer who shot Albert be fired immediately. Justice for Albert Arzola! Sent from my iPhone From: Bobby Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 7:51 PM To: Ryan Balius; Ashleigh Aitken; Carlos A. Leon; Norma C. Kurtz; Natalie Rubalcava; Public Comment; Sjany Larson -Cash; Audrey Lujan; Kristen Maahs; Natalie Meeks Subject: [EXTERNAL] You don't often get email from Learn why this is important Warning: This email originated from outside the City of Anaheim. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the message. Good evening everyone I have a suggestion of one of my many suggestions. It's time to open the library an hour early 11 AM is not fishing in the I meant. I'm worried the days when I was open 9 to 9. My suggestion for hours is for central Library during the week Monday through Friday 10 AM to 8 PM In for all the other libraries in the city 11 AM basically in the morning gone already it's mainly open in the afternoon enough with the 11 AM opening for the next you guys should consider opening the library at 10. Thank you for your time.