1965-477RESOLUTION NO, 65R 477
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 1689
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did receive a petition for zoning variance from
FRANK R. KROGMAN and LORETTA H. KROGMAN owners
o cer a n rea proper y s uated m e ity of7NEWEiTm, County
of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
PARCEL 1:
Lot 1 of Tract 2911, as shown on a map recorded in
Book 97, Page 17 of Miscellaneous Maps, Records of
Orange County, California.
PARCEL 2:
The East 290.00 feet of the North 366.00 feet of Section
Twelve, Township Four South, Range 11 West, in the Rancho
San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, as shown on a Map recorded
in Book 51, page 11 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of
Orange County, California.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM the North 185.00 feet of the East
185.00 feet.
AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a
public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on
May 10 19 65 notice of which said public hearing was
duly given as requ by law and the provisions of.Title 18,
Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, said City Planning Commission after due
inspection, investigation_and studies made by itself and in its
behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. 1630 Series
19 64 65 denying_ Variance No. 1689 and
WHEREAS, thereafter within twenty -two (22) days from
the date of the adoption of said resolution, the. City Council did
elect, upon its own motion, to review the action taken by the City
Planning Commission in denying said variance and did set a
public_hearing thereon to be held on the 22nd day of June,
1965 at 7 :00 o'clock P.M. in the City Hall in the City
Anaheim, and notice of such public hearing was duly given as
required by law and the provisions of Title 18,.Chapter 18.76 of
the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council does find that:
1. There is no substantial property right.,,possessed
by other property in the same vicinity.and zone
and denied the subject property.
2. It appears that the subject property can be
adequately developed and used under the present
zone.
THEREFORE,. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning Commission
denying Variance No. 1689 be, and the same is hereby sustained,
and that the petition of Frank R. Krogman and Loretta H.
Krogman for a conditional zoning variance permitting a waiver
of the aggregate area requirement of all signs facing each
300 lineal feet of street frontage (Section 18.62.090(a));
a waiver of the number of free standing signs permitted
(Section 18.62.090(b -1)); and a waiver of the location of free-
standing signs (Section 18.62.090 (b -5)), on the property
hereinbefore described, be, and the same is hereby denied.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me
this 22nd day of June, 1965.
ATTEST:
6 OF ITY ANAHEIM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
CITY OF ANAHEIM
ss.
MAYb OF THE CITY OF AHEIM
I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim,
do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and
adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the
22nd day of June, 1965, by the following vote of the members
thereof:
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of
Anaheim signed and approved said resolution on the 22nd day of
June, 1965.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 22nd day of June,
1965.
(SEAL)
AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler
and Krein
NOES: COUNCILMEN: None.
ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None.
1, DENE M. W!LLIAMS, CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING IS THE ORIGIN-
AL OF REEOLUT!ON NO. 5 11- .7 7. DULY PASSLD AND
ADOP L BY THE ANAHr!M CITY COUNCIL ON 6. /0
-2-
CITY CLERK