RA1980/02/0580 -12
ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
February 5, 1980, 1 :00 P.M.
Council Chamber
Anaheim City Hall
PRESENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour
ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: None
PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: William 0. Talley
CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins
SECRETARY: Linda D. Roberts
REDEVELOPMENT MANAGER: Robert Lyons
Chairman Seymour called the regular meeting of the Anaheim Redevelop-
ment Agency to order.
MINUTES On motion by Mrs. Kaywood, seconded by Mr. Roth, minutes
of the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency regular meeting held January 22,
1980, were approved. MOTION CARRIED.
FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY in the
amount of $713,159.28, in accordance with the 1979 -80 Budget, were
approved.
161.158: RELOCATION CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY No relocation claims
pending over a ninety -day period were reported.
161.118: CLAIM AGAINST THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: On motion
by Mrs. Kaywood, seconded by Mr. Roth, claim of Pacific Telephone
Case No. H940 -810U, for damages to conduit run and buried cable
sustained purportedly as a result of work operations for the
Redevelopment Agency on or about November 16, 1979, was denied and
referred to staff, as recommended by the Redevelopment Agency
General Counsel. MOTION CARRIED.
161.112: EMPLOYMENT OF HAASE & HEINEMANN, ORANGE G'OUNTY SUPERIOR
COURT CASES NOS. 27 -82 -20 AND 29- 71 -63 In accordance with recom-
mendation by the General Counsel, Mr. Overholt moved that the law
firm of Haase & Heinemann be allowed to represent Fremont Indemnity
Co. on its assumption of the defense of the Anaheim Redevelopment
Agency in the case of Simpson vs. Anaheim Redevelopment Agency et
al, and also be allowed to represent Fremont Indemnity Co. on the
cross - complaint by the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency against Fremont
Indemnity Co. in the case of Contreras vs. Anaheim Redevelopment
Agency et al. Mr. Bay seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
80 -13
ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FEBRUAR 5, 1980, 1:00 P.M.
RECESS Mr. Bay moved to recess to 3:00 P.M. for a joint meeting
with the Anaheim City Council to consider a proposed agreement
with the Masonic Building Association of Anaheim. Mrs. Kaywood
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (1:13 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS Chairman /Mayor Seymour reconvened the regular meet-
ing of the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency at 5:04 P.M. for the purpose
of holding a joint public hearing with the City Council to consider
a proposed agreement with the Masonic Building Association of
Anaheim for sale of certain real property located north of realigned
Lincoln Avenue, east of Helena Street, south of Chartres Street and
west of Clementine Street, within Redevelopment Project Alpha.
161.123: PUBLIC HEARING - SALE OR PROPERTY MASONIC BUILDING
ASSOCIATION OF ANAHEIM: Public hearing was held by the Anaheim
Redevelopment Agency City Council to consider proposed
disposition and development agreement with the Masonic Building
Association for sale of certain real property within Redevelopment
Project Alpha.
�--- Chairman /Mayor Seymour asked if a representative of the Masonic
Building Association wished to address the Redevelopment Agency /City
Council.
Mr. S. F. Roberts, representing said association, indicated their
satisfaction with the proposed disposition and development agree-
ment.
Chairman /Mayor Seymour asked if anyone else wished to address the
Redevelopment Agency /City Council; there being no response, he
declared the joint public hearing closed.
Mr. /Councilman Roth offered Resolution Nos. ARA80 -8 and ARA80 -9, and
further offered Resolution Nos. 80R -50 and 80R -51 for adoption,
approving the proposed disposition and development agreement and
finding no additional Environmental Impact Reports are required.
Mr. /Councilman Bay reported that he failed to see in subject agree-
ment any wording to insure that a provision of free parking for
employees, members and guests would be carried on to any tenants
of the proposed facility so that there will be no impact on the
surrounding neighborhood. He was of the opinion that there should
be a parking agreement included for all new downtown developments
to avoid the problems which could be created by parking charges.
80 -14
ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FEBRUARY 5, 1980, 1:00 P.M.
Dan L. Rowland, 1000 W. La Palma Avenue, Architect for the proposed
development, addressed the Agency /Council noting that although such
a parking agreement might have no impact on the Masonic building
now or in the foreseeable future, this might not be the case for
other possible projects in the Redevelopment area, and such a
parking agreement should not be imposed on future projects. He
called attention to other developments in the vicinity having pay
parking, such as the Bank of America building at the southeast
corner of Broadway and Harbor Boulevard, and was of the opinion
that if such a parking agreement was to be a standard condition,
the same should be imposed on a community -wide basis and include
such facilities as Disneyland.
Redevelopment Manager Susan Schick noted that if too many conditions
were imposed, the City's Redevelopment land could become less
desirable; she felt that the issue could be more feasibly addressed
to the City's Redevelopment areas south of Lincoln Avenue,rather
than setting a precedent in the area in question, where the majority
of parking will be for the Masonic Lodge.
In reply to question by Mr. /Councilman Bay, Ms. Schick reported
that leasing of a portion of the Civic Center parking structure was
involved in the Heil and Stookey agreement for the Willdan Office
Building at the northeast corner of Broadway and Anaheim Boulevard,
approved by the Redevelopment Agency and City Council July 3, 1979.
Although no charges would be made for those using the parking struc-
ture, tenants of the Willdan Building could be charged a use fee
as a condition of their lease.
Mr. /Councilman Bay pointed out that when the agreement for the
Willdan Building was approved,it was made very clear that, in order
to avoid any additional parking in the surrounding area, employees
and customers could not be charged for parking. He noted that when
the Bank of America commenced charging for parking in their struc-
ture, a parking impact was noted both at the Central Library and
the Police Department in the vicinity. In looking at the overall
development area, he felt guidelines should be established for
future parking.
Ms. Schick was of the opinion that imposition of a parking condition
on smaller developers might be a hardship. She further noted that
the development in question had been actively in progress for
approximately one and one -half years. —*
Mr. Rowland noted that the development in question has reached the
disposition and development agreement stage and the project is
fixed; although it is not anticipated at this time, if future con-
ditions required paid parking, the developer would return for
consideration thereof by the Redevelopment Agency and City Council.
80 -15
ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FEBRUARY 5, 1980, 1:00 P.M.
Chairman /Mayor Seymour suggested that if the parking restriction
issue were to be considered, studies be made and public hearings
held by the Community Redevelopment Commission and Redevelopment
Agency to consider standardizing the parking requirements in the
Redevelopment area.
In reply to question by Mr. /Councilman Roth, Redevelopment Manager
Susan Schick stated groundbreaking should take place in the fall
of 1980.
Resolution Nos. ARA80 -8 and ARA80 -9, previously offered by
Mr. /Councilman Roth, were restated. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. ARA80 -8 : A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY MAKING ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS NECESSARY FOR THE PROPOSED
DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOP-
MENT AGENCY AND THE MASONIC BUILDING ASSOCIATION OF ANAHEIM FOR THE
SALE AND DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY.
RESOLUTION NO. ARA80 -9 : A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE CONSIDERATION TO
BE RECEIVED BY THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PURSUANT TO A DIS-
POSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY AND THE MASONIC BUILDING ASSOCIATION OF ANAHEIM FOR THE SALE
AND DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY; APPROVING THE PROPOSED
SALE OF SAID REAL PROPERTY AND THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT PERTAINING THERETO; AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF SAID DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour
NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: None
Chairman Seymour declared Resolution Nos. ARA80 -8 and ARA80 -9 duly
passed and adopted.
City Council Resolution Nos. 80R -50 and 8OR -51, previously offered
by Councilman Roth, were restated. Refer to Resolution Book.
.._. RESOLUTION NO. 80R -50 A RESOLUTION
CITY OF ANAHEIM MAKING ENVIRONMENTAL
PROPOSED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE MASONIC
HEIM FOR THE SALE AND DEVELOPMENT OF
IN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ALPHA.
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
FINDINGS NECESSARY FOR THE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ANAHEIM
BUILDING ASSOCIATION OF ANA -
THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
.
ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, FEBRUARY 5, 1980, 1:00 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 80R -51 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO THE
CONSIDERATION TO BE RECEIVED BY THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
PURSUANT TO A DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE MASONIC BUILDING ASSOCIATION
OF ANAHEIM FOR THE SALE AND DEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY;
APPROVING THE PROPOSED SALE OF SAID REAL PROPERTY; CONSENTING TO
THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS BY THE AGENCY; AND
APPROVING THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PERTAINING
THERETO.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt,
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour
Mayor Seymour declared Resolution Nos. 80R -50 and 80R -51 duly
passed and adopted.
ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the
Anaheim Redevelopment Agency, Mr. Roth moved to adjourn. Mr. Over-
holt seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 5 :22 p.m.
LINDA D. ROBERTS, MCRETARY