Loading...
RA1981/02/2481 -20 ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FEBRUARY 24, 1981, 1:00 P.M. Council Chambers Anaheim City Hall PRESENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth, Seymour ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: None PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: William 0. Talley CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins SECRETARY: Linda D. Roberts EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Norman J. Priest REDEVELOPMENT MANAGER: Susan Schick Chairman Seymour called the regular meeting of the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency to order at 1:12 p.m. MINUTES On motion by Agency Member Kaywood, seconded by Agency Member Overholt, minutes of the regular meetings held February 3 and 10, 1981, were approved. MOTION CARRIED. FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY in the amount ---N. of $397,477.87, in accordance with the 1980 -81 Budget, were approved. 161: MONTHLY STATUS REPORT - JANUARY 1981 On motion by Mr. Roth, seconded by Mrs. Kaywood, the Monthly Status Report covering Redevelop- ment activities for the month of January 1981, was ordered received and filed. MOTION CARRIED. 161.158: RELOCATION COSTS - CASE NO. ARA- TB -47 On motion by Mr. Bay, seconded by Mr. Overholt, payment of relocation costs was authorized in the amount of $10,000, for a total not to exceed $20,842.11, in Case No. ARA -TB -47 as recommended by the Executive Director. MOTION CARRIED. 161.158: RELOCATION COSTS - CASE NO. ARA -TB -582 In accordance with recommendations by the Executive Director. Mrs. Kaywood moved that payment of relocation costs be authorized in an amount not to exceed $142,567.92, in Case No. ARA -TB -582. Mr. Roth seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 161.123: EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE AGREEMENTS - VILLAGE CENTER ASSOCIATES AND ANAHEIM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Executive Director Norman J. Priest outlined Redevelopment Parcels 4a through 4e, generally described as bounded by Olive Street on the east, Anaheim Boulevard on the west, New Lincoln Avenue on the north, and the alley immediately north of the Civic Center on the south. He reported on proposals received from the Village Center Associates and from the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce for development of Parcels 4a and 4b,respectively, and briefly reviewed recommendations submitted by the Community Redevelopment Commission that 90-8ay Exclusive Right to Negotiate Agreements between the Agency and Village Center Associates (Parcel 4a) and between the Agency and the Chamber of Commerce (Parcel 4b) be authorized; further, that the staff be directed to proceed with the design of a public parking structure to be 81 -21 ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FEBRUARY 24 1981 1:00 P.M. located generally south of the Senior Citizens residential complex, as shown on the Site Map displayed. This procedure would include determina- tion of the most appropriate financing mechanism, determination of the entity to own and operate the structure,and to negotiate terms and conditions of use with lessees, i.e., Village Center Associates, Chamber of Commerce, Mazza Properties, E1 Camino Bank Building and the Senior Citizens Center. Mr. Priest further reported that proposals for all five parcels under consideration had been received from Mazza Properties, Inc., and staff meetings were currently under way with that corporation to determine whether or not a viable development proposal could be coordinated for Parcels 4c, d and 3. He noted that the existing E1 Camino Bank Building was under proposal for restoration. The Chamber of Commerce proposal was to construct a facility for their use, and the Village Center Asso- ciates, a group comprised of local business people, was projecting a commercial office facility with restaurant and auxiliary uses. In addition, Mr. Priest advised that Weiner, Jacobs and Harrison, owners of individual lots within Parcel 4b, had presented a development proposal which was not favorably acted upon by the Community Redevelopment Commis- sion, and he noted that all those who had submitted proposals were present in the Council Chambers, with the exception of Mazza Properties, Chairman Seymour asked if any Agency Member or any interested party wished to be heard. Mr, Floyd L. Farano, Attorney.representing the Chamber of Commerce and also Mr. Obie Moore, addressed the Agency advising that they had dis- cussed certain issues with Mrs. Weiner, and she had contacted him this date requesting additional time to consider various aspects of the pro- posed Chamber of Commerce development. Mrs. Weiner came forward to state that she had been in touch with both Mr. Farano and Mr. Priest, and she confirmed that her family needed additional time to explore and study options available to them in connec- tion with the development of Parcel 4b. Brief discussion was held, and Chairman Seymour pointed out that the Chamber of Commerce represented the City's business community at large. He noted that a number of business people had exhibited faith in the Redevelopment program and had weathered the transition period for some years; and he expressed his pleasure that several small businesses were involved in the project under discussion. Mr. Seymour thereupon moved that a 90-day Exclusive Right to Negotiate Agreement between the Redevelopment Agency and Village Center Associates ..._. for development of Parcel 4a be authorized. Mrs. Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 81 -22 ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FEBRUARY 24 1981 1:00 P.M. On motion by Mr. Seymour, seconded by Mr. Bay, a 90 -day Exclusive Right to Negotiate Agreement between the Redevelopment Agency and the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce for the development of Parcel 4b was authorized, subject to approval by legal counsel for Mr. Obie Moore within a period not to exceed two weeks. MOTION CARRIED. It was moved by Mr. Seymour, seconded by Mr. Roth, that the Redevelopment staff be directed to proceed with the design of a public parking structure generally located as shown on the Site Map presented, including determina- tion of the most appropriate financing mechanism, determination of the entity to own and operate the structure,and negotiate terms and conditions of use with lessees. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT There being no further Redevelopment Agency, Mr. Bay moved the motion. MOTION CARRIED. business to come before the Anaheim to adjourn. Mrs. Kaywood seconded ADJOURNED: 1:35 p.m. LINDA D. ROBERTS, SECRETARY