Loading...
RA1990/06/051. 95 Anaheim Civic Center. ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY June 5. 1990, 5:20 P.M. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood, Pickler, Hunter AGENCY MEMBERS: None CITY MANAGER: James Ruth CITY ATTORNEY: Jack White SECRETARY: Leonora N. Sohl DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (Several Members of Redevelopment Lisa Stipkovich staff were also in attendance) A complete copy of the agenda for the meeting of the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency was posted at 4:00 p.m. on June 1, 1990 at the Civic Center kiosk, containing all items as shown herein. Chairman Hunter called the regular meeting of the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency to order at 5:42 p.m. MINUTES: Agency Member Kaywood moved to approve the minutes of the regular meetings held April 24 and May 8, 1990. Agency Member Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY in the amount of $763,188.62 for the week ending May 25, 1990; and $126,683.81 for the week ending June 1, 1990, in accordance with the 1989 -90 budget, were approved. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS: On motion by Agency Member Hunter, seconded by Agency Member Pickler, the following actions were authorized in accordance with the reports and recommendations furnished each Agency Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda: 1. 161.123: Approving a loan for the costs of development fees not to exceed $23,553 associated with the Habitat for Humanity Patt Street project located on Lot 6 of the Patt Street neighborhood (to defray the cost of development to lower the purchase cost of two condominium units for very low income households). 2. 161.123: Approving an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Donlan Investments for the purpose of rehabilitation of an existing industrial park generally located in a portion of the block at the northwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Euclid Way. 3. 161.123: Amending Demolition and Site Clearance Contract No. D89 -1 with Viking Equipment Corp., from $103,650 to $290,000 for asbestos removal in accordance with Air Quality Management District Rule 1403. End of Consent Calendar. MOTIONS CARRIED. RECESS: On motion by Agency Member Hunter, seconded by Agency Member Kaywood, the Agency recessed to later in the meeting for a Joint Public Hearing with the Community Redevelopment Commission /City Council, to consider the proposed Plaza Redevelopment Project. MOTION CARRIED. (5:43 p.m.) Later in the meeting (6:00 p.m.) Chairman Hunter reconvened the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency. 90 -44 1 0 Q Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY .,�. June 5. 1990, 5:20 P.M. 161.157: JOINT PUBLIC HEARING BETWEEN COUNCIL /AGENCY/COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION TO CONSIDER THE PROPOSED PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT: Mayor /Councilman Hunter called to order the Joint Session of the Community Redevelopment Commission, Anaheim Redevelopment Agency and City Council noting that the Members of the City Council also sit as Members of the Redevelopment Agency. The purpose of the Session is to conduct the subject Joint Public Hearing. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Doug Renner, Robert Doty, Donna Berry, Steve Bristol, Bob Anthony and Fernando Olivares ABSENT: Paul McMillan Co- Chairman, Community Redevelopment Commission (CRC), Donna Berry called to order the Commission and also introduced each Member of the Commission for audience information as requested by the Mayor. Mayor /Chairman Hunter then introduced Lisa Stipkovich, Director of Community Development for the City of Anaheim, to provide the background relative to the proposed Plaza Redevelopment Project. Lisa Stipkovich, Director of Community Development. -on" Prior to giving the overview to the redevelopment process, she is going to address a neighborhood flyer that was distributed in the area yesterday or today west of the proposed project area. The flyer claims that the proposed redevelopment project includes the redesignation of two areas; the parking lot on Loara Street between Price Elementary School and Westmont (the Loara site), and the Cal Fed parking lot between Euclid and the post office (Cal Fed site) as medium density housing which allows 18 to 20 apartments per acre without a further public notice. The anonymous author either was provided erroneous information or is attempting to mislead the community. A redevelopment plan does not change permitted land uses. Only general plan amendments, zoning ordinances and zoning amendments, adopted after a properly noticed public hearing, can change permitted land uses. The Cal Fed site is identified in the General Plan and in the proposed redevelopment Plan as commercial and not residential and it is consistent with its current use which is commercial. The portion of the Loara site fronting on Loara is currently designated medium density residential in the General Plan which allows up to 36 units per acre. The redevelopment Plan recommends an alternate land use subject to subsequent amendment to the General Plan and zoning ordinances a reduction in density to low medium which would allow up to 18 units per acre. The back portion or the one closest to the neighborhood to the east is designated low- density residential under the General Plan allowing up to 6 units per acre. The proposed 90 -45 M Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY June 5. 1990. 5:20 P.M. Redevelopment Plan makes no suggestion to an alternate use and would be consistent with the General Plan in allowing for a low density residential use. That site is currently zoned commercial (later further explained that it is zoned RSA - 43,000) and any change in zoning would require notification of all property owners within 300 feet whether or not in the redevelopment project area. Perhaps some of the confusion was caused by the post office site which is identified in the General Plan which is commercial and that the post office in the alternate land use would be identified as low medium residential use allowing up to 18 units per acre. That would require a general plan amendment, an additional public hearing and an amendment to the current zoning. It is a federal use and they would have to determine whether or not they would like to move out of the area some time in the future. That is a future possibility and it is not proposed. She emphasized the redevelopment action they are asking for tonight in no way changes any land uses. The adoption of the Redevelopment Plan would be to form the boundaries of a redevelopment project area and create the financing mechanism known as tax increment. Any future land use changes would require public hearings and notification of all surrounding property owners. Mrs. Stipkovich then gave a presentation on the history and background of the project and the reasons for undertaking the project. The area has been under consideration for some time. There are many problems and deficiencies in the area, both economic and physical, identified throughout the proposed plaza redevelopment project area. The declining and economically declining plaza shopping center has ranked near the bottom of all regional centers in Southern California in terms of sales productivity. In addition, there are many other problems throughout the area - inadequate infrastructure, inadequate sewer and storm drain systems, lack of sidewalks, curbs and gutters in portions of the area, deficient intersection capacities, inadequate traffic circulation for the area as well as proposed impacts by the Caltrans widening. The area does suffer from a poor image, poor parcelization in parts and confusing and inadequate access to the freeway. The area has been under consideration for some time and much more intensely since December of 1988 when they asked the Urban Land Institute to do a study. The Land Institute came up with a recommendation that the City of Anaheim and the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency look into putting the area into redevelopment. Since spring 1989, the Agency has been working on all the legal documents necessary for project adoption, including but not limited to, a preliminary plan, Draft EIR, preliminary report and Final EIR. Many workshops have been conducted including four public workshops, an open house at Anaheim Plaza, six news letters distributed to the 900 - member mailing list and staff has attended all of the task force meetings at the Chamber of Commerce which were 10 to 15 meetings. 90 -46 Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY June 5. 1990, 5:20 P.M. In summary, the information binder previously submitted to the Agency /Council /Commission as well as the items submitted as supplemental information today is the information to be used for their analysis in determining the feasibility of the proposed project. As well, all of the photos and exhibit boards posted in the Council Chamber relative to the project should become part of the record. (See information binder entitled - Joint Public Hearing on Proposed Redevelopment Plan - Plaza Development Project - which explains all aspects of the plan in detail and which includes among other documentation, the Final Environmental Impact report and all required documentation relative to plan approval. Also see supplement to report to the City Council on the proposed redevelopment plan for the plaza redevelopment project - made a part of the record). The affidavits of publication and of mailing notices to property owners and taxing agencies were then submitted to the City Clerk also to be entered into the record. City Clerk Leonora Sohl then announced that as of this moment, approximately 9,200 signatures have been received in favor of the plaza redevelopment project and one resolution in favor of the project from the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce signed by .o. Donald E. Natenstedt, President. No written comments in opposition to the project have been received. Mayor /Chairman Hunter opened the public hearing to receive testimony or questions. The following 20 people spoke to the project. Their comments /questions are summarized. Of the 20 people, one spoke in opposition, one did not feel saving the plaza was feasible, others had questions regarding disposition of their property or wanted clarifications relative to certain aspects of the plan. (A verbatim transcript of the proceedings is on file in the City Clerk's Office). Chuck Cooper, Plaza Merchant (owner, Hickory Farms). He represents COMBAP (Concerned Merchants for the Betterment of Anaheim Plaza). He has been in business in the Anaheim Plaza for 15 years. He has a resolution to be entered into the record after it is read. Mr. Cooper then read a resolution from COMBAP (made a part of the record) supporting the formation of the Plaza Redevelopment Project Area and asking the Agency /Council to implement the plan immediately, expedite redevelopment of the project area and to take "all action necessary to see that the development of Anaheim Plaza and the project area, be undertaken in a timely manner to enhance the business atmosphere in Anaheim and assure stability of the project area to the City." Charles M. Farano, Farano & Kieviet, 100 South Anaheim Boulevard, Attorney for COMBAP. Their estimates are if something is not done as soon as possible, if the redevelopment plan is not adopted, the plaza 90 -47 Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY June 5. 1990, 5:20 P.M. will be 50% vacant by the end of this year. It will basically spell "death" for the plaza. The property owner in the past has neglected and not kept up the property. There are several problems with the infrastructure and the traffic pattern surrounding the property that can only be overcome through redevelopment. The merchants in the plaza and the entire community have joined together with the help of the City to try and boost sales in the plaza area but it has not been enough. There is no time to waste. He is not present merely to urge the Council /Agency but to plea on behalf of the merchants of the plaza for them to adopt the plan. There is much support for it. Paul Bostwick, 1411 South Anaheim Boulevard. He does not have property in the area, but he is currently the Committee Chairman for the Community Development Committee of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce and within that is the Plaza Area Redevelopment Task Force. He then read in full the proclamation from the Chamber of Commerce previously submitted, strongly recommending that the Agency and Council adopt and implement the formation of a redevelopment project area known as the Anaheim Plaza Project Area and that such action be taken as quickly as possible. He also read excerpts from the Loesser report previously commissioned and submitted to the Agency relative to the project as well as Strategy 8 in the City's Vision 200 Plan, which were statements of further justification to put the redevelopment plan in place. Mayor /Chairman Hunter at in favor of establishing Approximately 100 people were also set up outside for a show of hands of tl opposition. this time asked for a show of hands of those present the proposed plaza redevelopment project. inside the Council Chamber raised their hand (chairs the Chamber for the overflow crowd). He then asked lose in opposition; there were two people who were in Christopher Whorton, President, Anaheim City School District, 2074 Della Lane. He was accompanied by his fellow Board Members and Superintendent. While the District has taken no position on the project, the City School District believes the agreement in concept reached between the School District and the Redevelopment Agency will be of benefit to the project, City of Anaheim in general and the students of the District. Under the terms of the agreement, the Agency will assist the District in acquiring a new downtown school site or in capital improvements to their existing school facilities. The cooperation exhibited by the Agency is refreshing and they wish the City well with the project. Marshall Krupp, business person in the community. He has a unique perspective on the redevelopment project. As past Chairman of the City's Economic Development Board, they were very much involved in evaluating the opportunities for 90 -48 Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY June 5. 1990, 5:20 P.M. Anaheim in terms of revitalizing and enhancing the economic environment throughout the community. One of the primary objectives the Board conveyed to the Council was the need to address Anaheim Plaza and the constraints in terms of redevelopment and development activities surrounding the plaza. This is the only opportunity the Board saw for bringing together the public and private sector to enhance the quality of Anaheim Plaza. It has been a community effort to come to where they are today. Although Anaheim is one of the larger cities in Orange County, it is the only city without a viable regional shopping center and Anaheim Plaza is the location where it should be. He knows there is only one decision to make and that is a vote to revitalize Anaheim Plaza. John Machiaverna, 608 South Hilda, and owner of a jewelry business in the Anaheim Plaza. (J. Mac Jewelers) He has approximately 300 more signatures on petitions signed today in the Westmont /James area. He is on the Board of Directors of the Anaheim Merchants Association. He then read a document from the Board wholeheartedly endorsing approval of the Anaheim Redevelopment Plaza Project (made a part of the record). Doris Taylor, 1461 West Beverly Drive, Anaheim. She is representing herself but many of the neighbors in their area (Westmont) have discussed the matter many times. They do support redevelopment of Anaheim Plaza and would very much like to have a regional shopping center that works for everyone. It is very unfortunate that the flyer previously discussed was distributed since it caused great concern and mild panic. The implied threat of many apartment buildings brought out many homeowners. It is regrettable that the misunderstanding took place and she is grateful that the matter was cleared up. They need assurance the City is looking out for the residents' best interest. Jeff Kirsch (opposed), 2661 Palais, Anaheim. He does not support the redevelopment project and he has expressed opposition in the past to redevelopment projects. He expressed his opposition and concern relative to tax increment financing. Later in the meeting, Mr. Kirsch again expressed his concern relative to such financing and posed a line of questioning on tax increment financing answered by Mrs. Stipkovich. Mr. Kirsch also questioned if over time is it not reasonable to expect in that area as well as other areas that costs to the City will increase with more costs going to police services and the like. Lisa Stipkovich. It should have the impact of lessening all the social services and police requirements for the area. If there is better housing, better commercial areas, better managed properties, it 90 -49 ISO Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY June 5. 1990, 5:20 P.M. can be shown statistically that there are less problems in terms of crimes and other issues. There should not be any increase in additional City services for the area. It is targeting the money to go back into that area to help solve problems. The theory in tax increment is that without redevelopment spurring on the new development, they would probably not get any additional increment. Without the Agency /City there to help in redeveloping the plaza, it would probably stay stagnant or else go downhill. She invited Mr. Kirsch to come to the Agency's offices where staff would be happy to answer any further questions or expand on those posed tonight. She will also put his name on the mailing list to receive any additional information on the project. Lorretta Bowen, 1208 North Street, in the project area. (Staff confirmed that Mrs. Bowen's home was not, in fact, inside the project area). She supports the project as far as redeveloping Anaheim Plaza but she also has concerns relative to the financing and if additional public hearings were going to be held regarding the financial effect on the taxpayer. She also stated that in a �-- General Plan, variances and ordinances can be changed without public notice. Lisa Stipkovich. She first clarified that the only way to change zoning is through a zoning ordinance. She then deferred to the City Attorney. City Attorney, Jack White. Any action that would change the land use of any of the property within the proposed redevelopment area would have to be done either by a general plan amendment or a zoning ordinance, conditional use permit or variance, all of which require noticed public hearings. There is no action that the City could take to change the land use for the property that would not require a noticed public hearing before the City Council or Planning Commission. Lisa Stipkovich. Relative to tax increment financing, it is really a misnomer. The people who are in a redevelopment project area pay no additional taxes. It is a redistribution of who gets the taxes. The property tax base is frozen at the time a project is adopted and any additional property tax normally paid due to a sale or property being developed because it is a higher density or value is still based upon the same rate everybody else pays. That increment would go to the Redevelopment Agency rather than the taxing entities that currently receive it. It is more of a redistribution. What it guarantees is that the money the Agency gets would be reinvested only in that area. It is a way of 90 -50 Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY onft June 5. 1990, 5:20 P.M. directing funds to help an area. There is no impact of the redevelopment project of increased taxes in and of itself. That money would then be utilized in a different way and the Agency would have the capability of putting it back into the area. Alfred Diaz. He is the owner of Anaheim Plaza Travel, 500 North Euclid, and is speaking in support. An item not mentioned is the decrease in sales tax revenue that the City has suffered because of deterioration of the mall. If the project is approved, the City will receive additional sales tax revenue over the years. Michael Yawn, 1414 West Wedgewood, Anaheim. While he is in favor of redevelopment of the plaza, the neighbors are concerned about the apartments that are going to be built. Mrs. Stipkovich interjected and again explained the situation relative to the concern expressed by Mr. Yawn which she had explained earlier in the meeting. The Loara site is currently general planned for 1/2 of that property as low density and the other half medium density. It is now zoned commercial. If anyone wanted to come in and build units on that property, they would have to first get a zone change which would automatically trigger a public hearing and the neighbors could give input. If the plan is approved, it will be consistent with the General Plan and be the exact same land uses, low and medium density. Knowing the concern in the area, they are recommending even lowering the density further as an alternate land use. The General Plan and the zoning would have to take place and could only be done through the public hearing process and those within 300 feet would be notified. The zoning on that portion of the site (closest to the residents) is residential agricultural but would require a zone change because the agricultural zone calls for only one unit per acre. She believes the misapprehension and misinformation that was given out was that in some way that was going to be considered tonight and that is not true. Roberto Queva, 1221 West Dwyer, Anaheim. Twenty -seven years ago when he came to Anaheim, the plaza was very profitable despite its limited access from the freeway and surrounding streets. The location is not one that anyone would choose today to build a shopping center. Further, it will be competing with the shopping centers in Buena Park, Orange and Brea as well as South Coast Plaza, which is one of the best in the United States. It is not a good location and there is no land to expand. Lisa Stipkovich. Some of the comments made relative to competition are legitimate; however, the site is certainly large enough for a 90 -51 LILOXI ..-. Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY June 5. 1990, 5:20 P.M. regional mall since it contains almost 50 acres. The problems of access are also very accurate and that concern is part of what the proposed redevelopment project will address - improve all access to the plaza. One of the things government can do, working in conjunction with the private sector, is to use the financing mechanism to improve access for the public. It is not bailing out the private sector but there are times when government needs to step in. In this case, it will make the site more viable to create the catalyst to make something happen. It is not costing any additional money to the taxpayer. She reiterated it is a redistribution of property tax and not an additional tax. She then answered additional questions posed relative to how access would be improved and stated she would be very happy to discuss this with Mr. Queva further. Michael J. Sofia, (28 -year resident). He works, plays and lives in the City and he would like the privilege of spending his money in Anaheim. They should not be second to any city. He is an optimist and not a pessimist. He would like to continue shopping at Anaheim Plaza and urges the -^ redevelopment of the plaza. Dr. Elwood Wiseman, 1246 Dwyer Drive. Most of the people in his neighborhood are aware of the problems in Anaheim Plaza and agree that changes and improvements need to be made but they need some reassurances. They feel one of the most dangerous City intersections is Loara and Westmont and they would like reassurance that area will be protected so it will be safe for those who live in the area and safe for the children who go to Adelaide Price School. Lisa Stipkovich. The ultimate Caltrans widening would eliminate the off ramp on Loara and thus would minimize traffic at Westmont and Loara. Ed Holmes, 1435 Beverly Drive. He is in favor of the redevelopment program but the owners of the plaza have shown great reluctance to improving anything. He asked how the Agency was going to inspire them to do something. Lisa Stipkovich. The owners do have the property up for sale and there is significant pressure on them to do something. It is being marketed by the firm of Goldman & Sachs and that firm has talked to them extensively about what redevelopment could or could not do. Most developers the Agency has talked to have said that they need the help in order to improve the infrastructure. Mr. Holmes continued that he believes the Agency has recommend that the plaza become a discount shopping center that would 90 -52 S9 Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY June 5. 1990, 5:20 P.M. generate high traffic as opposed to a regional or "higher class" center. Lisa Stipkovich. Although the prior Urban Land Institute Report proposed a value oriented center, in subsequent meetings since December of 1988, they have hired the firm of Congleton & Associates to do an additional study as to what potential repositioning of that center might be. They came up with several concepts. The Agency feels there is a market for some of the international stores currently not in the Southern California area which will be the type of development that might be pursued. It is difficult to give specifics until they know who the developer is. The direction from the Council and the Commission is to get the highest quality development possible - something exciting and a unique retail experience. Leonard Lahtinen, 2731 West Savoy, Anaheim. He wants to clarify the ownership of the Anaheim Plaza. He is a teacher in Anaheim. The plaza is owned by the State Teachers Retirement System (STRS) but the teachers have no control over it. It is a state government agency that taxes and invests the teachers earnings. The teachers are very concerned about the plaza property. The Anaheim Secondary Teachers Association and Anaheim Elementary Educators Association have petitioned STRS asking them to move on the property. Two months ago they sent resolutions to STRS to advise them that the teachers are concerned about the demise of the property. They live in the community and want the community's economy to be healthy. They are pleased to report they did receive a response indicating STRS was aggressively attempting to sell the property, have several prospective buyers and expect to complete a sale within 60 to 90 days. An unidentified gentleman spoke in favor of the proposed redevelopment project and thanked all involved for the work they had done to bring the matter to where it is today. Jan Myers, 2443 East Olive, business at 1771 West Lincoln. She asked questions specifically relative to her property within the project area which were answered by Mrs. Stipkovich. She wanted to know if the project is approved, how many years or months before her property is involved. Mrs. Stipkovich explained that there were no immediate plans for anything at this time other than Anaheim Plaza which presently is the number one priority. Eventually they would like to sit down with all property owners and businesses in that District to talk about improvements and will probably be setting up planning workshops in the next six months. The project is a long -range one with changes that might occur over the next 35 years but not in the immediate future. There are also no specific plans for acquisition of property in the area. 90 -53 Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY June 5. 1990, 5:20 P.M. Michael McFadden, J. Mac Jewelers, Anaheim Plaza. He was born, raised and educated in Anaheim and is now co -owner and operator of the subject business in Anaheim Plaza. In the beginning, it was a nice mall but at this time he is not proud to say his business is in Anaheim Plaza. He would like to be able to do so in the future. Dennis Bass, President of the Corporate General Properties. They own and control the 17 -acre parcel at Euclid, Broadway and Lincoln, which has been sitting there since 1984. They were ready less than a month ago to proceed with a facelift of the existing center and adding on additional footage. The total sales tax revenue maximum to the City would have probably been less than $200,000. With the project, they can put into the property a quality center that would produce almost $500,000 of sales tax to the City. They will not be looking to the City to put money in their pocket but they will self - generate from the revenues created and work with the Agency. They are not going to be dealing with 1990 land prices on the property but 1984 land prices. They have been working with the Agency which is an excellent one. Benefits accrue more to them than to the City. Chuck Cooper. He thanked all who came in support this evening. Speaking for himself and on behalf of the merchants of the plaza, he commended the City Manager, City Council, Commission, Mrs. Stipkovich and her staff for doing an outstanding job and for the tireless effort put forth to get the project going and bring it to fruition. Staff has had many public meetings and met with whoever has been interested. He thanked everyone involved and urged them to go forward and to be proactive instead of reactive. Lisa Stipkovich. She thanked all the people at Anaheim Plaza who have been extremely cooperative and have been working on the project with staff for a long time. They have gone through many meetings together. There has been great support and cooperation. They are very sincere and earnestly interested in wanting to see a better place. She also thanked the members of her staff. Mayor /Chairman Hunter. There being no further testimony or evidence to be received, he closed the public hearing on behalf of the Council and the Redevelopment Agency. Donna Berry, Co- Chair, Community Redevelopment Commission. There being no further testimony or evidence to be received, she closed the public hearing on behalf of the Community Redevelopment Commission. Commissioner Doty offered Resolution No. CRC90 -9 for adoption, considering the Final Environmental Impact Report prepared and certified by the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency for the Plaza Redevelopment project. Refer to Resolution Book. 90 -54 Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY June 5. 1990, 5:20 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. CRC90 -9: A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COMMISSION MEMBERS: Renner, Doty, Berry, Bristol, Anthony, Olivares NOES: COMMISSION MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSION MEMBERS: McMillan The Co- Chairman declared Resolution No. CRC90 -9 duly passed and adopted. Commissioner Doty offered Resolution No. CRC90 -10 for adoption, approving and adopting the Redevelopment Plan for the Plaza Redevelopment Project and recommending City Council approval. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. CRC90 -10: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CONSIDERING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED AND CERTIFIED BY THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COMMISSION MEMBERS: Renner, Doty, Berry, Bristol, Anthony, Olivares NOES: COMMISSION MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSION MEMBERS: McMillan The Co- Chairman declared Resolution No. CRC90 -10 duly passed and adopted. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Chairman /Agency Member Hunter offered Resolution No. ARA90 -21 through ARA90 -23, both inclusive for adoption, the first approving and adopting Relocation Assistance Guidelines for the Plaza Redevelopment Project, the second approving and adopting the Redevelopment Plan for the Plaza Redevelopment project and recommending City Council approval, the third finding that the use of taxes allocated from the Plaza Redevelopment project for the purpose of improving and increasing the community's supply of low and moderate income housing outside the Project Area will be of benefit to the Project. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. ARA90 -21: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AND ADOPTING RELOCATION ASSISTANCE GUIDELINES FOR THE PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. RESOLUTION NO. ARA90 -22: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL. 90 -55 1 Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY June 5. 1990, 5:20 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. ARA90 -23: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FINDING THAT THE USE OF TAXES ALLOCATED FROM THE PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR THE PURPOSE OF IMPROVING AND INCREASING THE COMMUNITY'S SUPPLY OF LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING OUTSIDE THE PROJECT AREA WILL BE OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS: Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood, Pickler and Hunter NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: None The Chairman declared Resolution Nos. ARA90 -21 through ARA90 -23, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTIONS: The titles of the following resolutions were read by the City Clerk. (Resolution Nos. 90R -179 through 90R -181, both inclusive, for adoption) Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the resolutions. Councilman Daly seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Mayor /Council Member Hunter offered Resolution Nos. 90R -179 through 90R -181, both inclusive, for adoption, the first considering the Final Environmental Impact Report Prepared and Certified by the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency for the Plaza Redevelopment Project, the second finding that the use of taxes allocated from the Plaza Redevelopment Project for the purpose of improving and increasing the community's supply of low and moderate income housing outside the Project Area will be of benefit to the Project, and the third ruling on written and oral objections to the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Plaza Redevelopment Project. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 90R -179: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CONSIDERING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED AND CERTIFIED BY THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. RESOLUTION NO. 90R -180: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING THAT THE USE OF TAXES ALLOCATED FROM THE PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR THE PURPOSE OF IMPROVING AND INCREASING THE COMMUNITY'S SUPPLY OF LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING OUTSIDE THE PROJECT AREA WILL BE OF BENEFIT TO THE PROJECT. RESOLUTION NO. 90R -181: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RULING ON WRITTEN AND ORAL OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood, Pickler and Hunter NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None 90 -56 Anaheim Civic Center. ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ..m„ June 5. 1990, 5:20 P.M. The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 90R -179 through 90R -181, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. Celeste Brady, Community Development. Because no written objections were lodged prior to this hearing or at the Joint Public Hearing, the Council may take action relative to the proposed ordinance. Councilman Hunter offered Ordinance No. 5136 for first reading. ORDINANCE NO. 5136: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE PLAZA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. Mayor Hunter noted that the ordinance will be coming back to the Council next week for adoption. Council Members then gave their closing comments relative to the just approved Plaza Redevelopment Project. By general consent, the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency meeting was adjourned. (7:32 p.m.) By general consent, the Community Redevelopment Commission meeting was adjourned. (7:32 p.m.) ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST: No items of public interest were addressed. ADJOURNMENT: Agency Member Hunter moved to adjourn. Agency Member Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (7:32 p.m.) LEONORA N. SOHL, SECRETARY 90 -57