HA1976/06/1576 -4
ANAHEIM HOUSING AUTHORITY
JUNE 15 1976 (1:00 P.M.)
Council Chamber
Anaheim City Hall
PRESENT: AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
ABSENT: AUTHORITY MEMBERS: None
PRESENT: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: William 0. Talley
CIWY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts
Df,_}'UTY CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts
CO'rIIUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR: Knowlton Fernald
HOUSING DIRECTOR: Rosario Mattessich
INITERIM ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, REDEVELOPMENT: Dan D'Urso
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Malcolm Slaughter
Chairman Thom called the Regular Meeting of the Anaheim Housing
Authority to order at 1 :27 P.M.
MINUTES: On motion by Mrs. Kaywood, seconded by Mr. Roth, minutes of
the Regular Meeting of the Anaheim Housing Authority held June 8,
1.976, were approved. MOTION CARRIED.
REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE ANAHEIM HOUSING AUTHORITY:
Demands against the Anaheim Housing Authority in the amount of
$906.94, in accordance with the 1975 -76 Budget, were approved.
HUD SECTION 8 UPDATE - REPORT, MAY, 1976: Housing Director Rosario
Mattessich briefly summarized his report for May, 1976 (copies •�
furnished each Authority Member), advising that 59% of the families
in the Housing Assistance Program which have been certified are in
place, as compared to his estimate of 60% given on June 1, 1976
(see minute page 76 -1). He referred to the last page of his report,
consisting of a map illustrating the location of families assisted
through the Section 8 Rent Subsidy Program. A total of 157 families
have been assisted as of the end of May, and it is anticipated that
by the end of July, the full 200 family allocation will have been
filled, and work can be commenced in preparation for the next
Section 8 allocation from HUD.
A newly revised statement of occupancy for the waiting list
will be submitted in the near future, and Mr. Mattessich noted that
new regulations will require some changes, and will allow some
additional flexibility in reciprocal moving between cities. The
new administrative procedures, policy statement and the new budget
for the fiscal year will have to be submitted to HUD.
In response to question by Mrs. Kaywood, Mr. Mattessich reported
that a few of the units being utilized are single family houses for
large families. With reference to her question on June 1, 1976,
regarding the setting aside of some units for persons who would be
in need of relocation assistance, he stated that his investigation
has illustrated that HUD will not approve "set -- asides" specifically
for persons displaced; however, these persons can be given priority.
Mr. Seymour congratulated the Housing Director on his compre-
hensive report, designed to illustrate the basic objectives.
76 -5
Anaheim Housing Authority - June 15, 1976, 1 :00 P.M.
In response to questions by Mr. Seymour and Mr. Roth, and
for purposes of clarification, Assistant City Manager William 0.
Talley pointed out that the CETA team which worked on the survey
in connection with the downtown redevelopment program had not
been funded for the 1976 -77 Budget year, and a smaller group of
CETA personnel was being utilized by the Housing Authority staff,
currently being assigned to distribute literature to residents
in connection with the Youth Paint and Pick -up Program.
PROPOSED HOUSING AUTHORITY BUDGET, 1976 -77: On the recommendations
off' the Community Development Director, no action was taken on the
proposed 1976 - -77 Housing Authority Budget recommended by the
Co.;amunity Redevelopment Commission, and said budget was referred to
the City Council to be considered together with the proposed
budgets for the Redevelopment Agency and Community Development
Department during the continued public hearing on the total pro-
posed City Budget, on motion by Mr. Thom, seconded by Mr. Roth.
MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business before the Anaheim
Housing Authority, Mrs, Kaywood moved to adjourn. Mr. Kott
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED..
ADJOURNED: 1:35 P.M.
ALONA M. HOUGARD, SECRETAX.
SIGNED: .;g i Wit:' ; _DEPUTY