Loading...
RA1976/06/1576 -5 ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY JUNE 15 1976, (1:00 P.M.) Council Chamber Anaheim City Hall PRESENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour (entered 1:25 P.M.), Kott, Roth and Thom ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: None PRESENT: ASS [ST ;�':;iT CITY MANAGER: William 0. Talley )RNEY: Alan R. Watts D ' TTY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts i.i y DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR: Knowlton Fernald HC ,lSl" JvG DIRECTOR: Rosario Mattessich INTERIM ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, REDEVELOPMENT: Dan D'Urso DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Malcolm Slaughter Chairman Thom called the Regular Meeting of the Anaheim Redevelop- ment Agency to order at 1:00 P.M. MINUTES: On motion by Mrs. Kaywood, seconded by Mr. Roth, minutes of the regular Anaheim Redevelopment Agency meeting held June 8 1976, were approved. Mr. Seymour absent. MOTION CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Demands against the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency in the amount of $16,372.01, in accordance with the 1975 -76 Budget, were approved. YOUTH PAINT AND PICK -UP PROGRAM (COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT Community Development Director Knowlton Fernald noted that when the City Council approved a Community Development Block Grant application for the City on April 13, 1976 (Resolution No. 76R -175), one of the authorized projects included was the Youth Paint and Pick -up Program. The Community Development Department and the Community Redevelopment Commission recommended that this program be extended into the portions of the redevelopment area which are designated on the plan for preservation, together with the rehabil- itation program in the redevelopment area. A number of structures which are well -cared for and in good condition would be relocated to nearby sites, toward an overall goal of housing stock preserva- tion in the redevelopment area. Mr. Fernald further explained that the Paint and Pick -up Program is a cooperative venture between the City of Anaheim and the Anaheim Union High School District, utilizing local low - income youth to help low - income families, senior citizens, the disabled and handicapped. He briefed his memorandum report dated June 4, 1976 (copies furnished each Agency Member) and referred to the map projected on the east wall of the Council Chamber, illustrating the project area, which dwellings are owner- occupied, and which residential properties would qualify for this paint and pick -up project based on the fact that there is no recycling, relocation or redevelopment anticipated in those areas. The funds to be allocated for materials and equipment would not exceed $5,000. Mr. Gus Duran, Neighborhood Preservation Coordinator in the Community Development Department, outlined the program in greater detail, including the guidelines which are essentially the same as those utilized by the Housing Authority. The participating youth would range from fourteen to eighteen years of age, and would be supervised by college students and an experienced instruc- tor of the Anaheim Union High School District. The program would 7 6 -6 Anaheim Redevelopment.A&ency - June 15, 1976, 1.00 P.M. commence immediately and would consist of rubbish removal, and preparation and painting of home exteriors. There would be a $500 limit established for materials and supplies for any one dwelling, however it was estimated that approximately $200 would be the most spent on any one house. No cost would be incurred for the labor which would be furnished by the youth as described under the Neighborhood Youth Corps. RESOLUTION NO. ARA76 -7: On the recommendation of the Community Redevelopment Commission and the City Attorney, Mr. Thom offered Resolution No. ARA76 -7 for adoption, authorizing the preparation and execution of an agreement with the City of Anaheim to allocate $5,000 for the Community Development Department to conduct the Youth Paint and Pick. -up Program., RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AUTHORIZING EXECU- TION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE YOUTH PAINT AND PICK -UP PROGRAM. Roll Call Vote: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS: Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Thom NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: Seymour Chairman Thom declared Resolution No. ARA76 -7 duly passed and adopted. NEW PERSONNEL CLASSIFICATIONS, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT: At the request of Mr. Thom, the Personnel Director's recommendation that two new personnel classifications be created in the Com:~nunity Development Department, Marketing Coordinator and Project Manager, was placed in abeyance, pending discussion of the 1976 -77 Budget as it pertains to the Redevelopment Agency. PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET, 1 976 -77: On the recommendations of the Community Development Director, no action was taken on the proposed 1976 -77 Redevelopment Agency Budget recommended by the Community Redevelopment Commission, and said budget was referred to the City Council to be considered together with the proposed budgets for the Housing Authority and Community Development Depart- ment during the continued public hearing on the total proposed City Budget, on motion by Mr. Thom, seconded by Mrs. Kaywood. Mr. Sey- mour absent. MOTION CARRIED. PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT - HANCOCK LABORATORIES, INC.: On May 11, 1976, the Redevelopment Agency instructed staff to prepare a parti- cipation agreement with Hancock Laboratories, Inc., for joint participation in the construction of a roadway extending northerly from La Palma Avenue to provide access to properties north of facilities occupied by Canteen Corporation, which fronts on the north side of La Palma Avenue. Mr. Fernald advised that a report received from the City's Real Property Division reflects contacts made.with the adjoining property owners. Using maps projected on the east wall of the Council Chamber, he defined the existing Hancock property frontage adjacent to Canteen Corporation, with a larger parcel adjacent on the north, and the triangular parcel occupied by Ajax Company further to the east of the Canteen Cor- poration. Also noted was Santa Fe Land property located immediately north of the Ajax Company parcel. 76-7 Anaheim Redevelopment Agency - June 15,1 1:00 P.M. In addition to the contacts made by the Community Development Department staff, Mr. Fernald advised that the Real Property Divi- sion's contacts resulted in an offer to sell the necessary 1,230 square feet (the 12 -foot strip dedication) by the owners of the property on which Canteen Corporation maintains its facility, for $10,000. The owners of the Ajax Company property to the east indicated a willingness to negotiate for acquisition by the Agency of the necessary 52 -foot strip along their property. and to consider an exchange of parcels with Santa Fe Land Company, which might provide them with a more developable parcel, and could result in little or no cost to the City. Mr. Fernald stressed the need of Hancock Laboratories, Inc. tw �I.nalize sub` ,_ ct agreement with the Agency in order to proceed wit's. their plani':e.d expansion. Recognizing the amount of time which be involved in finalizing further negotiations with the separate property owners, he recommended that the Redevelopment Ageticv authorize execution of said agreement. Mr. Roth expressed concern that to execute said agreement would place the staff in a non - negotiable position with the other property owners. He was of the opinion that an appraisal of those portions of the Canteen Corporation and Ajax properties required for the roadway should be obtained to determine the value thereof. Mr. Fernald replied that appraisals have been authorized, how -:ver the information has not yet been received. In his opinion, i': the participation agreement with Hancock Laboratories were approved, negotiations could proceed and the staff could report back to the Agency, with further consideration to be given at that time as to acceptable amounts and the possibility of eminent domain proceedings. Mr. Thom concurred with Mr. Roth that to finalize the agree- ment at this point could diminish the ability to negotiate with the other property owners involved; however, the amount of money involved did not seem to be an excessive amount,,-and the Agency had continued the matter from May 11 for a report of the approxi- mate amount involved. (Mr. Seymour entered the Council Chamber, 1 :25 P.M.) City Attorney Alan Watts pointed out that it was necessary for both Santa Fe Land Company and the Hancock firm to have.the access in order to develop their properties; therefore,_it was in their best interests to do whatever is reasonable in order to accomplish that end. RESOLUTION NO. ARA76 -8: On the recommendations of the Community Development Director and the City Attorney, Mr. Thom offered Resolution No. ARA76 -8 for adoption. A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT, (Hancock Laboratories, et al.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: A AGENCY M MEMBERS: K 76 -8 Anaheim Redevelopment Agency - June 15, 1976, 1.00 P.M. Chairman Thom declared Resolution No. ARA76 -8 duly passed and adopted. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business Redevelopment Agency, Mrs. Kaywood moved to seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED, ADJOURNED: 1 :27 P.M. ALONA M. HOUGARD, SECRETARY. S IGNED• <� �. �' t EPUTY ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY JUNE 22 1976, (1 :00 P.M.) Council Chamber Anaheim City Hall PRESENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Thom ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: Seymour PRESENT: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: William 0. Talley CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR: Knowlton Fernald DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Frank A. Lowry, Jr. DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Malcolm Slaughter HOUSING DIRECTOR: Rosario Mattessich Chairman Thom called the Regular Meeting of the Anaheim Redevelop- ment Agency to order at 1:00 P.M. MINUTES: Approval of the minutes of the regular Anaheim Redevelop- ment Agency meeting held June 15, 1976, was deferred one week. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Demands against the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency in the amount of $2,610.12, in accordance with the 1975 -76 Budget, were approved. bi RESOLUTION NO. ARA76 -9: On report and recommendation by the City , Attorney, Mr. Roth offered Resolution No. ARA76 -9 for adoption, approving agreement for title reporting services to the Redevelop- ment Agency in connection with the acquisition of properties in the redevelopment project area. before the Anaheim adjourn. Mr. Roth A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT FOR TI`"LE SERVICES, (Title Insurance and Trust Company)